Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
7-
7-
rs
v:
3-
The year 2000 was the one hundred and twenty-fifth anniversary of the
announcement of the discovery in Constantinople of the Didache' by
Philotheos Bryennios2 in a manuscript now housed in the Greek patriarchate of Jerusalem.' During that time we have become used to the idea of
spectacular discoveries that can change our perceptions of the early church
and radically alter how we read the traditionally available material such as
the fourth-century collection of early texts commonly known as 'the New
Testament'. However, while the Didache lacks the exciting allure of the
Qumran and Nag Hammadi documents, it probably has provided as much
information on the earliest decades of Christianity as these larger and more
famous discoveries. It is a text, now in 16 chapters (really little more than
paragraphs), which can be read in less than an hour.' In terms of theology
and Christian practice it contains almost nothing that would much surprise
the average Christian todaythough it would annoy many of them, and
has done so since its publication in 1883.5
1. The edition used in preparing this article is that found in Holmes (1992: 24669); this edition has been compared in the case of each citation with that in
K. Niederwimmer's text (1998). The latter book is currently the most comprehensive
introduction to the Didache and scholarship devoted to it.
2. The discovery was made in 1873 and announced in 1875, with the editio
princeps appearing in 1883. For an account of the discovery the key work is Schaff
(1886: 1-10); there is summary in Niederwimmer (1998: 19).
3. Codex 54; there is a facsimile of folios 76-80 (which contain the Didache) in
Harris (1887); and a summary of its contents in Niederwimmer (1998: 19); and cf. also
Audet (1950).
4. Schaff (1886: 23) pointed out that it is about the same length as Paul's letter to
the Galatians.
5. The more irrational late datings (fourth and fifth centuries) suggested by some
84
Christian Origins
Since its publication it has not been without scholarly attention.' Within
a few years of its appearance there were major studies in German by Adolf
von Harnach (1884), in French by Paul Sabatier (1885), and in English by
F.W. Farrar (1884) in Britain and Philip Schaff (1885) in America.' By the
1930s there had been so many studies of this little text that one commentator, F.E. Vokesin a very strange book, for he thoroughly disliked the
text to which he devoted many years of study described it as 'the "spoilt
child" of criticism' (Vokes 1938: 6-7).8
Two major schools of interpretation soon took shape.9 The first was in
France where the text was held to be first century and from the general
area of Syria; the second was in German lands' where it was dated to
some time in the second century and from Egypt. Anglophone scholarship
took a variety of positions but on the whole tended towards the German
school, although it produced a series of eccentric studies beginning with
Charles Bigg who in 1898 described it as 'a romance of the fourth century'
and had its fullest exposition in Vokes who believed that it was the work
of a 'very mild Montanist' at 'the end of the second century or at the
beginning of the third' (Vokes 1938: 208-220)." It is important to note the
writers are evidence of this annoyance. Their dismissal of the Didache from discussions of Christian originsfor it is so dismissed if it is a 'post-apostolic' document
are usually justified by the fact that only with a long passage of time (and so, they argue,
inevitable ecclesiastical corruption) could `un-evangelical' features such as fixed rules
regarding prayer have arisen among the Christians; cf. Ehrhard (1900: I, 62).
6. While Niederwimmer (1998) provides a thorough account of the scholarship on
virtually every matter of significance, the best historiographical review is Jefford
(1989: 3-17).
7. For the details of these works, see Jefford (1989: 3-13).
8. Vokes (1938: 6-7) (when he quoted Bigg 1898 who has been seen as the first of
the British school who have argued that the Didache is an elaborate literary fiction, cf.
Niederwimmer [1998: 43-44 n. 16] where he is particularly critical of Vokes). Vokes
returned to the topic many years later (1964) without any evidence of any alteration of
his views. Vokes, like Bigg, dismissed the earlier datings on the basis that the Didache's
praxis too resembled the later 'corrupted' church that was often labelled 'early Catholicism' (Friihkatholizismus).
9. This division into schools is based on Jefford (1989: 3-17).
10. This school embraced Polish scholars who lived in regions which were then
part of Germany, e.g. Krawutzcky (1884).
11. For an account of these writers, see Jefford (1989: 15); but see Niederwimmer
(1998: 43-44 and also 52 n. 16, 68) for a more critical assessment. This approach
culminated in Middleton (1935) who saw 'the Didachist' as from a 'Jewish community
and on his conversion composed his curious little work' which has not made 'any
85
existence of these schools of thought as it has caused many Englishspeaking scholars who use the Didache for parallels to their main concerns
to use fudges such as 'pre-third century, perhaps mid-second century or
earlier, from either Egypt or Syria', which really say nothing and only
serve to distract students from giving the document the care it merits.'
Essentially the difference between the dates (mid to late first century versus
early to mid second century) depended on whether one approached the text
from the appearance of the church it described (the French approach) or as
a witness providing evidence to the formation of the Gospels. Using the
German approach, since the Didache seemed to use Matthew (and others
found Luke, Acts, Paul, Ignatius of Antioch and even Justin)" it must be
later than those documents. Equally, the text as we have it shows signs of
redaction,' a process which takes time, and argues for a later date. But
equally it has practices such as the cup before the loaf at the Eucharist, a
ritual that had already changed by the time Matthew was written, and which
argue for an earlier date.' However, as our understanding of Gospel foruseful contribution to our knowledge of the Early Church' and not 'worthy of anything
like the serious attention that was at one time given to it' (1935: 267). Happily this
eclipse of the Didache in English-speaking scholarship seems to be coming to an end,
but even today it receives more attention from German and French scholars.
12. A good example of this is to be found in Jasper and Cuming (1980: 14) who
introduced the text thus: 'It has been allotted dates varying from AD 60 to the third
century' without further comment. This statement then informs writings by other
liturgists who often conclude that there is little agreement about the Didacheeven
fewer recognize that the late datings are eccentricand opt for the latest date as 'the
safe option'.
13. The central thrust of scholarship on the Didache has been to establish its
literary relations with other texts, either with the New Testament texts for those who
argue for an early date (cf. Jefford 1989 passim; and Niederwimmer 1998: 46-52) or to
the 'apostolic fathers' for those who have argued for a later date.
14. This is agreed by all, but the significance attached to the activity (i.e. redaction
of components into a single manual or simply the binding together of materials for
convenienceif these activities can be distinguished), especially in so far as redaction
reflects use of other texts (see the preceding note), has a bearing on the whole study:
see Niederwimmer (1998: 1-2).
15. Cf. Did. 9.2-3 with Mt. 26.26-28; in support of the Didache order cf. 1 Cor.
10.16 and Lk. 22.17-19; in support of what established itself as the liturgically standard
order, cf. 1 Cor. 11.23-26 and Lk. 22.19-20. This question has attracted much attention
during the last century, and for an approach that fully embraces these different
traditions of practicein contrast to earlier approaches which saw them as textual
contradictionssee Nodet and Taylor (1998: 88-123). For a study of the various texts,
see Voobus (1968).
86
Christian Origins
mation has changed, so too has the way that we look at this text, and today
there is a broad consensus that the original form of this document goes back
to the middle of the first century, and that it draws on the same strands of
traditionwritten or oral that both Matthew and Luke drew upon,' 6 and
that it received the form in which we have it by the end of the first century
(if not earlier) as a manual' for presbuteroi.' This positionessentially
that of all recent editors of the text: J.P. Audet, Stanilaus Giet, Willy
Rordorf and Andr Tuilier and Kurt Niederwimmer19has major implications for how the text is used in studies of early Christian communities
and must alter the way that it is used by students of the canonical collection of documents in particular. It means in many cases that textsalthough
hallowed by centuries of familiarity and doctrinal commitmentmust be
seen as secondary to the Didache as witnesses to the earliest communities
(the study of Acts is the example sans pared), while the Didache must
move from being a peripheral, subsequent text to being centre-stage in our
study of many of the basic activities of the church such as regular gatherings for the Eucharist. This is, of course, already happening in studies
where it is the actual community and its beliefswhich we know through
its literary products such as the Gospelsthat are the focus of attention,
but there are still many studies that focus on the canonical text as the source
or vehicle of religious information, and in which the Didache is viewed as
but a useful, if complicated, source of parallels and 'background'. This
article is an attempt to demonstrate how one can glimpse an aspect of the
life of an early community through the Didache with our other sources
16. In many places the Didache seems verbally closer to Matthew, in other places it
seems verbally closer to Luke; and there have been many studies that sought to show
that it is linked either with Matthew or Luke. However, that such studies are inconclusive is what we should expect: all three documents represent the common church tradition which is fixed textually in slightly different ways by each text. The crucial point is
that all three reflect the tradition prior to the time when it was part of the tradition to
assert the tradition's content by reference to a fixed, written text. This question is
addressed in every study of the Didache, the most extensive recent study being by
Jefford (1989); however, for an elegant presentation of the evidence, noting that the
Didache is independent of any of our existing Gospels, see Glover (1958-59).
17. The designation 'manual' was first given to the Didache by Philip Schaff
(1886: 16). Schaff thought of a manual in a quasi-official sense: a 'brief Directory of
Apostolic teaching, worship and discipline'; while I also use the word manual I do not
wish to imply some semi-official status; rather, that some materials came together
because it was most convenient to have them in one place in a single small codex.
18. See Milavec (1994).
19. See Niederwimmer (1998: 233-34) for the details of these editions.
87
88
Christian Origins
89
`updates' of the basic text: someone, probably in the early second century,
had the manual and decided that he would add at its endperhaps where
there was a blank page in his copy27a useful homily (Did. 16), and that
update stands behind our surviving manuscript.28
However, we now encounter the paradox of manuals. If, perchance, they
do survive, then there comes a time when the very fact that they are so
primitive, and linked to people now seen as the progenitors of a tradition,
means that they attain the status of monuments. Then they become worthy
of being reproduced and studied as relics. Here, perhaps, lies the reason
why someone in 1056 CE coming across an obvious antiquity entitled 'the
teaching of the twelve apostles' deemed it worthy to be copied once more.
But if the Didache is a monument for those seeking apostolic relics
because of its title's claim to have links with the apostles and the earliest
times, then it has another claim on our attention as historians as a piece of
pastoral ephemera. This value to investigators of the earliest Christian
communities lies in the fact that `low-level' documents with their stress on
what should be done in concrete situations, and their interest in day-to-day
problems, allow us to see how individuals believed and behaved. While all
documents reveal a community in some way, such ephemera reveal their
home far more directly. To return to my analogy: if one wanted to understand the concerns that animated the Christian communities in Ireland in
the 1980s, to what sources should one turn? One would certainly find
much of value in books and formal statements written at the time, but one
would have a much fuller picture of how the Christians viewed the situation by looking at newspapers (even at the adverts in them), looking at
regulations that were issued, and at lists of meetings that took place in
parish halls. The value of the Didache to historians is that it belongs to this
second category of document. It is a witness to a living community and
its cares which were changing from day to day.' As Niederwimmer has
remarked: 'The whole composition is unpretentious as literature, nourished by praxis and intended for immediate application' (1998: 3). Unlike
Acts, which has a theological vision of what the Church should be in con27. The possibility of such a page is based on its transmission in a codex made up
in quires, and I take the use of a codex for granted; cf. Roberts (1979); Roberts and
Skeat (1983); Skeat (1994; 1997).
28. This proposal would accord with Niederwimmer's dating of the Didache (1998:
52-53), but also shows my sympathy (against Niederwimmer 1998: 42-43) with those
(Audet, Giet, Rordorf and Tuilier) who hold that the text as we have it is the result of
several redactions.
29. See Kraft (1965: 64-65).
90
Christian Origins
trast to its actual defects, the Didache is not a theological work; but in so
far as it proposes rules to a community to be followed, it can reveal to us
the operative theology of its compilers and the communities which used it.
A Manual
Most attention to the Didache during the twentieth century focused on
what it could tell us about other thingsespecially the Gospels as texts.
Today, its value is increasingly seen to lie in what it tells us of the concerns and everyday priorities of an early community. Therefore, the picture of the early Church we discern in the Didache is at the opposite end of
the spectrum to that given in Acts with its imaginary 'golden age'. Thus
far I have referred to the Didache as a 'manual' (Schaff s term) and as a
piece of ephemera (my term), but, as Aaron Milavec has pointed out, we
must use such terms with caution lest by them we imply that the Didache
was an 'off the cuff' document or the casual product of some presbuteros
(1994: 118). Milavec has shown there is a careful rhetorical structure in
parts of the text which was probably given to it in order that its guidance
could be memorized. The obvious implication of his research is that what
we have is not an individual's notes, but the record of a community's
decisions on matters of discipline and organization. The term 'manual'
was used disparagingly by Schaff. In the Didache's regulations on various
matters he found something out of accord with his notion of primitive
`evangelical liberty'a state which he imagined had to precede any more
formal organization within Christianity. As such, a 'manual' was an indicator that Christianity was already in downward spiral from the Lukan
`golden age' as read through the eyes of late nineteenth-century rationalist
Protestantism.' I use the word 'manual' in the wholly positive sense of
manuale or enchiridion: a distillation designed to be user-friendly in that it
allows key, frequently accessed information to be conveniently retained by
its users. As such, the Didache is one of the first of many similar works
which we know existed, but which have in most cases vanished with only
accidental traces. Moreover, we know from later examples that such short
collections of diverse pastoral materials often contained items known as
meinoriae technicae, exactly as Milavec has argued that the Didache
contains. By calling it a piece of ephemera I mean that it was assembled
30. See Schaff (1886: 29) where he sees 'the beginning of liturgical bondage' and
of practices which 'interfere with evangelical freedom' in the Didache. For an analysis
of how that agenda informed many studies of early Christianity, see Smith (1990).
91
with a specific situation in mind rather than planned as some ideal guide to
Christian praxis. Thus we have moral instruction, combined with ritual
regulations, some rules dealing with problems facing that community, and
lastly (what is usually referred to as the eschatological section) what is
probably the earliest surviving sermon notes.
The Didache is a pastoral manual produced in the first century in a place
where there was not yet any of our canonical texts; and consequently should
be used by us an independent witness to Christian praxis in that community.' We should compare alongside it other contemporary texts such as
the genuine Pauline letters; and we should use it as a backdrop when
reading later Christian documents from the first and second centuries, be
they canonical or not, when we attempt to imagine the Christian community in which those writings were valued. What follows is a sketch of one
aspect of early Christian living which we glimpse through it.
Fasting: A Regular Custom
The Didache assumes, as was the case within contemporary Jewish practice,' that there was regular weekly fasting by the community:
Do not let your33 fasts [take place] with [i.e. at the same time as] those of
the hypocrites. They fast on the second [Monday] and fifth days [Thursday]
of the Sabbath; you,34 though, are to fast on the fourth [Wednesday] and on
the day of preparation [for the Sabbath: i.e. Friday] (Did. 8.1).
92
Christian Origins
93
moon or a Sabbath' (Col. 2.16), then, many have argued, the Didache
must be a later document when the ritualizationit has been a widespread
assumption in nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship that the
original Christianity was not only free of ritual but against the very notion
of Christianity was well under way. The theme was well stated at the
very beginning of the study of the Didache by Schaff:
The prescription to fast before Baptism (in Ch. VII. 4) and on Wednesday
and Fridays (Ch. VIII) goes beyond the New Testament, and interfered with
evangelical freedom. The Lord condemns the hypocritical fasting of the
Pharisees, but left no command as to stated days of fasting (1886: 29).
have no reality; the Didache, by contrast, offers a simple, non-nuanced regulation: 'keep
well clear of food offered to idols because that is the worship of dead-gods' (6.3).
39. The canonical texts, as writings, were seen not only to be ritual free but also to
be such that they allowed their readers to live lives free of religious ritual. Ritual, as
such, they held was part of the world of paganism, and the antithesis of 'word'.
40. See Smith (1990: esp. 54-84).
41. It is this hypothesis that underlies the approach of Nodet and Taylor (1998).
94
Christian Origins
that which marks out the community's group culture, do we get any hint as
to how they imagined its purpose to themselves?
Fasting as a Form of Love
The first mention of fasting in the Didache is at the very beginning of the
text where we have a saying forming part of a piece of teaching known as
the 'Two Ways '.42 The 'Way of Life' is 'love of God who made you' first,
and then 'love of neighbour as yourself' Although generically claimed
by the title of the Didache as 'the Lord's teaching through the twelve apostles' this commandment is not explicitly claimed as a saying of Jesus, and
it is located within a catechetical framework rather than in some historical
situation. The love of neighbour is then explained using a troika of blessing,
praying and fasting:
Now the teaching of these words is this [that you] bless those who curse
you and prayer for your enemies and fast for those that persecute you [Urrip
-r6v 6tCJKOVTCOV Upasi. For what credit is it to you if you love those who
love you? Do not the nations do the very same! (Did. 1.3)
While this immediately rings many bells for us, it is worth noting how
different it is to those echoes it calls up for us.' First, we are used to the
troika of alms, prayer and fasting (cf. Mt. 6.2, 5, 16), but here we have
blessing, praying and fasting. These are the three ritual actions with which
Christians respond to attacks with acts of love. Second, what is found here
as a single unit of teaching is found in a variety of places in the Synoptic
tradition. In Mt. 5.44 we have 'Love your enemies and pray for those
who persecute you' (61-rip -r(31/ 6tcoK6v-rcav 6pC(5), which is arguably
less demanding than fasting for them. In Lk. 6.28 we find 'bless those who
curse you, pray for those who abuse you' (TrE pi TC3V ii-rripEacci rc.ov 605),
while in Mt. 5.46-7 we have 'For if you love those who love you, what
reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you
salute only your brethren, what more are you doing than others? Do not
even the Gentiles do the same?' While the Didache gives this as a direct
instruction; in Matthew it is expanded with explanations such as: 'Love
42. This is the most studied part of the Didache because of parallels in Jewish and
other early Christian sources, cf. Niederwimmer (1998: 30-41); and to see some of the
complexities that surround this part of the Didache, see Goodspeed (1945).
43. Did. 1.2; and cf. Lk. 10.27; Mt. 22.37-39; and Mk 12.30-31; for a discussion of
the textual relationships, see Jefford (1989: 29-37).
44. See Jefford (1989: 38-48) for the textual relationships.
95
your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be
sons of your Father who is in heaven; for he makes his sun rise on the evil
and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust' (5.44-45).
While in Luke it is supported with examples such as:
Bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you. To him who
strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also; and from him who takes away
your coat do not withhold even your shirt. Give to every one who begs from
you; and of him who takes away your goods do not ask them again. And as
you wish that men would do to you, do so to them (6.28-31).
96
Christian Origins
does the baptising and the one who is baptised, and any of the others who
can. Tell the one who is to be baptised to fast for one or two days before
hand' (Did. 7.4).49
The great difficulty about this text is that while it lays down a rule about
who is to fast and for how long, it gives no hint as to how they perceived
the purpose of this practice, nor does it offer any theory about the origin or
benefits of the practice. That a pre-baptismal fast was an early practice
within the church is not in doubt. Indeed, it is confirmed indirectly by
Luke in Acts 9 when he presents such a fast as taking place prior to Paul's
baptism. The presence of this element in his story shows that Luke assumes
that his readers will view it as a standard, well-established, custom. In 9.9
Luke states that from the moment of revelation on the Damascus road,
Saul 'neither ate nor drank for three days'. Then, having met Ananias, he
was baptized and took food again (9.19).50 Moreover, we know that the
practice continued in the church for we have many later references to it.51
But, given the fact of the practice, can we draw on other sources which
might throw light on how it was understood?
Some commentators have seen this fast as designed so as to dispose the
recipient to receive divine illumination;52 however, that would not explain
the need for the minister to fast, nor do we know whether or not they understood baptism in terms of illumination. The first point to note is that the act
of baptizing a new member into the Church is imagined as a process that
personally involves not just the recipient of baptism, and the one who
baptizes (both baptizer and baptized seem to be equally involved),' but
the whole community. This larger involvement is implied by the Didache's
desire that the community should fast in preparation for a new member's
baptism. A minimal explanation is that since they understood baptism to
be a decisive moment both for the individual and the community, then
49. The most extensive commentary on this text is in Voobus (1968: 20-21);
however, to see how this text is the first in a trajectory of texts from the early period
until the third century, see Niederwimmer (1998: 129-31).
50. I wish to thank Dr Brendan McConvery for reminding me of Paul's fast in Acts
9.
51. The earliest of these later references is in Justin Martyr, Apologia 1.61-62.
52. See, e.g., Meloni and De Simone (1992).
53. That the baptizer has any individual personal involvement in the baptism is
something that would soon disappear in the church, such that the focus was on the
baptismal action (the pouring of the water with the correct verbal formula), with some
interest in the attitude of the one baptized, but with the assumption that the baptizer
merely was the agent for the pouring of the water and the expression of the formula.
97
fasting was taken as a standard part of the preparation for a major religious
event, and that the moment was of such importance as a rite of passage
that everyone concerned had to be spiritually fully ready for it.' This
could look back to Moses's fast of 40 days prior to receiving the Law
(Exod. 34.28) or Daniel awaiting a revelation (Dan. 10.3) as its model and
inspiration. And, it is very likely that it is against the backdrop of their
own pre-baptismal fasting that they would have understood traditions
about Jesus' fasting prior to his public ministry as witnessed, for us, in
Mk 1.13, Mt. 4.2 and Lk. 4.2. It is also possible that this pre-baptism fast
was penitentialfor which there was the precedent in 1 Sam. 7.6with
the fast being seen as a purification prior to entry into Christ. If one accepts
the notion, mentioned above, that they imagined a universe where spiritual
benefits could be transferred from one person to another, then it may be
that the fast of the various members of the church was to produce a benefit
that could be transferred from them to their new brother/sister to enable
the initiate to turn away from his or her sins and to enter Christ.
A more elaborate explanation, following from the scenario just proposed, would relate this fast to a connection being made by the community
between baptism and an exorcismwhich would later become a standard
part of baptismal rites. Voobus addressed this possibility:
It was believed [he asserts on the basis of later evidence] that fasting had a
purifying effect and contained expiatory power. It was also held that fasting
could break the power of demons and that it strengthened the efficacy of the
prayer of the candidate. This is what was regarded adequate [sic], for the
preparation of the body for the reception of the Holy Spirit (Viiiibus 1968:
20).
If the fast were only that of the candidate, then fasting as a spiritual
preparation could provide an explanation of the matter, but the involvement
of the minister and preferably others in the community points to the fast
being a collective act of intercession for the candidate. If the demons are
to be confronted and ejected, then all involved must work together to bring
about their casting out from the individual. If this line of argument is followed, then here again we have the notion that the effect of fasting is to be
understood in terms of the spiritual solidarity of the whole community:
engaging in this act together, they work for the holiness of the church54. While the notion that the baptizer is entering the mystery as much as the one
baptized is foreign to later Christian theology, that an event of such spiritual magnitude
in the eyes of the participants would make severe demands on the minister is not
foreign to students of ritual, cf. e.g., Turner (1969: 20-33).
98
Christian Origins
and it is the church that is strengthened by the process. It is not the candidate alone who must confront the demon that is within them, but also the
minister who carries out the exorcism' (and who consequently needs to be
fortified for the encounter), and those at the centre of the process are
buoyed up by everyone else in the community who have chosen to help
this new member by adding their fasts.
In support of the possibility that they understood the fast as part of a
ritual of exorcism we have only one tantalizing piece of evidence: the text
of Mk 9.29 that there are demons that 'can only be driven out by prayer
and fasting' .5' The words 'and fasting' disappeared long ago from critical
editions as they were held to be a later addition to the text, as has the
whole verse's other occurrence at Mt. 17.21. The reason for the exclusion
of 'and fasting' is based on the phrase being omitted in the major textual
families (`common omissions' logically point to something that was not
present in the common ancestor of those families), despite the counterindicative evidence of its being well attested in terms of numbers of manuscripts of every text family. Where, as here, the evidence of the manuscript
readings is contradictory, the formal deductive methods of textual criticism cannot alone produce a answer and the critic must fall back on
historical conjecture to indicate the more likely earliest reading. Bruce
Metzger approaches the matter thus:
In light of the increasing emphasis in the early church on the necessity of
fasting, it is understandable that Kai VflGTEla is a gloss which found its way
into most witnesses. Among the witnesses that resisted such an accretion
are important representatives of the Alexandrian, the Western, and the
Caesarean types of text (Metzger 1975: 101).
99
100
Christian Origins
But there are some significant differences. The text of the Didache prohibits 'fasting with the hypocrites', while Matthew is concerned about the
intention and purpose of fasting for Christian fasts must not 'be like the
hypocrites'. What 'fasting with' means has been the subject of debate, but
the simplest explanation from the context is that 'fasting with' relates to
102
Christian Origins
sharing the same fasts, that is, times of fasting. The position would appear
to be this: if our group's fasts coincide with that of another group, then we
are one with that other group.' That a sense of sacred time, and particularities of calendar, can provide a very firm group definition64such was
one of the distinguishing features of the sectaries at Qumran65is not,
however, what is most significant about Did. 8.1. The Didache reveals a
community who believe that simultaneity in rite is a means through which
sacred union can be maintained within a larger, dispersed group of devotees
one might almost say 'communion'. The essence of this belief is that if
two physically separate groups carry out the same religious activity at the
same timewhich is marked off against an 'absolute' common to both
such as specific daysthen we have a single action, taking place in two
locations, and so one actor and one objective for the action. 'The fast' is
not just a collective name for individuals' activities in common, but was
being reified as an event in which each person participated through his or
her avoidance of food.' For a group who thought about ritual time and
action in this way, if one fasted on the same days as the others, then one
would be in union with them at a most profound level. The community of
the Didache does not want union with those Jews who are not Christians
and so stays clear of ritual union with them, and their appeals to God, by
fasting at different times; but equally, by demanding that the Christian communities fast at the same time, they see themselves establishing a union
whereby they petition God as a single bodythough physically dispersed
with their fasting.
This developed sense of ritual time should not surprise us. It was, in part,
the belief that the Jerusalem priesthood was using the 'wrong calendar'
that is, ritual was not taking place at the correct moment in absolute time
63. This is well expressed in the translation by Cody (1995: 9); and by Kraft (1965:
165) when he translates: Tut do not let your fasts fall on the same days...'
64. See Sproul (1987).
65. See Vermes (1975: 42-44).
66. This attitude to 'the fast' as an event distinct from the activity may appear logically flawed to many western Europeans today, but that approach neglects to recognize
how individuals within a religious group view their common rituals as independent of
them as actorsthey view themselves as participating in a drama which has been
taking place before their entry and in which they are duty-bound to take part. This
perception is a common element of religious traditions, with regard to fasting one has
simply to recall how Roman Catholics prior to 1961 approached 'the fast' before 'going
to communion' or 'the black fast' in Lent, or how Muslims today refer to fasting during Ramadan; cf. Douglas (1973: 59-76).
104
Christian Origins
If in fasting there are not several individual fasts, but one fast by the whole
church, so while there are many physical gatherings for the Eucharist on a
Sunday morning, there is just one sacrifice from the whole people.
However, while the community may have been concerned that they were
spiritually separate from 'the hypocrites', they also were concerned with
creating a practical social separation between two groups. The other group
is, in all likelihood, a group of Jews who considered themselves Pharisees,
for fasting on second and fifth days was a Pharisee practice.' The designation of 'the hypocrites' is probably part of the mutual dislike of the two
groups, which we find also in Matthew's Gospel (6.2, 5, 15; 15.7; 22.18;
has been studied by Rothenbuhler in cases where a modern state uses as part of its
ritual 'a minute's silence' as a precise moment and the citizens are united through the
actionfor which there is no basis for any assumption that the early Christians were
immune. Contrariwise, we can see this attitude to time in connection with fasting,
prayer, and other rituals as the link between those attitudes when found in late Secondtemple Judaism (e.g. Judith) and the sentiments later expressed by Christians about the
Liturgy of the Hours.
71. Our Father .. . give us ...our...bread...forgive us our debts as we forgive our
debtors...lead us not...but deliver us...
72. See 1 Cor. 16.2 and Acts 20.7; and the expectation in Lk. 24.13 and Jn 20.1931 that regular meetings of the Christians occur on Sundays. On the importance of
Sunday in the early church, see Rordorf (1968: 238-73).
73. See Casel (1999) where he develops the patristic theme that the mystery of
Christ is available momentarily in the liturgy.
74. This link between the Sunday gathering and their sacrifice is explicitly made in
Did. 14.2.
75. See Schtirer (1979: II, 383-84).
23.13, 15, 23, 25, 27, 29). The message here is simple: have nothing to do
with them and be obviously different. We know that the Didache was composed within a very Jewish-Christian community, and as this passage makes
clear the two groups are still cheek-by-jowl; hence the desire by Christians
to demarcate themselves ritually from many of the former co-religionists.
Didache 8.1 and the Gospels
The instruction in the Didache calls to mind two texts in the Synoptic
Gospels. The first is Mt. 6.16-18 where (by contrast to the Didache which
locates its teaching as community, apostolic, regulation) the teaching on
fasting is placed directly on the lips of Jesus. For Matthew the Jewish
context is far less immediate, and the issue of physically demarcating communities is absent. Rather than being concerned with two groups of people
Pharisee-Jews and Christians the Gospel is concerned with Christians;
and its aim is to inculcate the correct intention and attitude without which
fasting is useless: 'the hypocrites' are a notional other which illustrate an
attitude to be avoided. For the community of the Didache fasting is
something one does because one belongs to a particular community, and it
is a recognized bonding ritual; it is identification with real people rather
than with an attitude that is to be avoided. Matthew takes a practice with
which his community is obviously familiar and he wishes to interpret it
spiritually;76 he shows no interest in the benefits to the community's selfperception in having shared rituals, and apparently without reference to
any notion of sacred time.' Matthew seems to take the practice of organized fastingas also prayer and almsgivingfor granted, and to be concerned that no one should use his or her success in performing these group
activities as a means of demonstrating their religious prowess in the group.
Hence, one should hide one's success in fasting from others (see Mt. 6.18),
or else one's only reward is good repute within the community (see Mt.
6.16).
There is also a difference in their approaches to the common term 'the
hypocrites'. In Matthew, this term has become a class-designation for
76. As already noted, see Glover (1958-59: 18-19).
77. The silence of Matthew on these notions cannot be seen as criticismpresumably they were part of his community's experience and common understanding,
and if criticism of those ritual notions were intended he would have made that explicit.
Rather, his concern is with the approach to fasting as a practice within his conception
of the Christian.
106
Christian Origins
those who have the wrong motivationinto which anyone who fasts could
fallrather than a specific, distinct religious group referred to by a derogatory label. If one accepts this point, then it has implications for how we
read many uses of the term in Matthew, especially the 'woes' in Mt. 23,
`Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites...' (23.13, 15, 23, 25, 27,
29). In this case he is employing a usage familiar within his community
where 'hypocrites' is a vulgar synonym for 'Pharisees' while removing its
sting: Pharisees who fall into the category of hypocrites are those to whom
a curse applies. This interpretation would fit with the opening of the discourse at 23.2-3.
The other echo of Did. 8.1 in the canonical collection is the parable of
the Pharisee and the tax collector in Lk. 18.9-13. If we assume that the
Didache witnesses to widespread practices in early Christianity, not just
the idiosyncrasies of particular communities, and that there is good reason
for this assumption with regard to fasting; then starting with the Didache
alters how we read this text. It could be common knowledge that Pharisees
fast twice weekly, they are at prayer, and they give tithes which can be
seen as the equivalent of alms. These are practices including the twiceweekly fastfamiliar within Christian communities, thus the warning about
performing these practices is not a criticism of the practices or their value,
but of performing them in a useless way like the Pharisees, and without
the more basic activity of humbly seeking pardon. Certainly, for the community of the Didache that the Pharisees did those things, but equally did
them fruitlessly as hypocrites, would have been taken as common knowledge. In short, the Didache lays down what is to happen, while the Gospel
writers act as preachers recalling their audiences to what each perceives
as the intention and purpose of their churches' practice. Having isolated
the praxis, through the Didache' s evidence, the distinct theologies being
preached in the early church by writers such as Matthew and Luke become
more clearly displayed.
Enlarging the Context
The cumulative information of our first- and early second-century sources
shows that fasting was a fixed element of early Christian practice and ritual.
It was taken over from Judaism and associated, in particular, with the practice of the Pharisees and John the Baptist (Mk 2.18-22 and par.). Luke
imagines one of the earliest churches, Antioch, fasting (Acts 13.2), while
Matthew (4.2) and Luke (4.2) add the example of Jesus' own fasting during his time in the wilderness to the Markan account (1.13). However,
there also seems to have been hesitations about the practice or how some
gave it a rationale. Mark, followed by both Matthew and Luke, records a
tradition that Jesus and his followers, unlike the other groups, did not fast
(Mk 2.18-22), while both Matthew (6.16-18) and Luke (18.9-13) are interested in the correct attitude to fasting so that it is not mere external display.
For the Didache there is neither hesitation about fasting, instruction
about intentions, nor information on its supposed benefits; its sole concern
is with fasting correctly. Such bluntness is exactly what one expects in a
guide to group behaviour and brings us right into the atmosphere of those
who used it pastorally: get the practice right, and then wonder about what
it means and about right intentions. But, acknowledging that the Didache
does not offer explanations, can we learn anything else about the community and how it understood its activity? In the Synoptics a link is made
between fasting and mourning that the Bridegroom is no longer with them
(Mk 2.19; Mt. 9.15; Lk. 5.35), and so fasting has a connection with longing for the eschaton: it belongs to the time before the final return of Christ.
In a slightly later work, The Pastor, we also find fasting as a standard
Christian practice, but its purpose and benefits are explained in detail. It
is undertaken as a sacrifice to the Lord, and brings practical benefits to the
community (the cost of the food not eaten must be calculated and that
amount given to the poor) and the household, for the practice is a family
affair and fasting together brings about family happiness.' Moreover, in
The Pastor, as in Matthew's Gospel, there is a concern that Christians
should not simply fast, but should engage in fruitful fasting that is acceptable to God.'
We have already seen that the community of the Didache had a developed sense of sacred time. Moreover, their week had a religious structure
which reflected their Jewish past and Christian present. They celebrated
the 'Lord's Day' as the first day of the week, they still referred to the Sabbath as the seventh day for they referred to the sixth day (Friday) as 'the
Preparation Day' (Parasceve), and also following Jewish practice they referred to days by numbers rather than by names. Thus they knew that the
78. This second-century work, often linked with the name Hermas, preserves many
traditions from the first century that are related to a Jewish-Christian context. The
reference to fasting occurs in Parable (Similitudes) 5.3.56.5-9 (Holmes 1992: 432-33);
for the background cf. Snyder (1992: 148); for a detailed commentary on the passage,
see Osiek (1999: 173-74).
79. Parable (Similitudes) 5.1.54 (Holmes 1992: 426-29); cf. Osiek (1999: 168-69).
108
Christian Origins
80. Parable (Similitudes) 5.1.54.2 (Holmes 1992: 426-27). These were frequently
seen as Wednesday and Friday and explained by reference to the Didache (see Meloni
and De Simone 1992: 319), but as Osiek (1999: 169) has pointed out, the term seems
to be as obscure in Hermas' church as it is for modern readers: it is our assumption that
these days were weekly and followed the Didache pattern on the basis that Tertullian
later refers to Wednesday and Friday as 'station days' (on the term's possible origins,
see Osiek [1999: 169 n. 6]).
81. De iehtnio 14; and see the 'classic' statement of this interpretation by Augustine,
Epist. 36.16.30.
82. See Jn 19.31 and cf. Mt. 27.62, Mk 15.42 and Lk. 23.54.
83. For an account of this problem in pre-critical exegesis, see O'Loughlin
(1997).
84. For a list of the various attempts to explain the choice of days, see the notes to
Niederwimmer's excursus on Jewish fasting (1998: 132-33).
110
Christian Origins
Bibliography
Audet, J.P.
1950
Bigg, C.
1898
Carter, W.
1995
Casel, 0.
1999
Cody, A.
1995
Douglas, M.
1973
Ehrhard, A.
1900
Evans, G.R.
1995
`A Hebrew-Aramaic List of Books of the Old Testament in Greek Transcription', ITS NS 1: 135-54.
The Doctrine of the Twelve Apostles (London: SPCK).
`Recalling the Lord's Prayer: The Authorial Audience and Matthew's Prayer
as Familiar Liturgical Experience', CBQ 57: 514-30.
The Mystery of Christian Worship (New York: Crossroad [1962]).
`The Didache: An English Translation', in Jefford 1995: 3-14.
Natural Symbols (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).
Die altchristliche Litterature and ihre Erforschung von 1884-1900 (Freiburg:
Herder).
`Theology's Historical Task: The Problem of the Disciplines', New Blackfriars 76: 19-30.
Glover, R.
`The Didache's Quotations and the Synoptic Gospels', NTS 5: 12-29.
1958-59
`Patristic Quotations and Gospel Sources', NTS 31: 234-51.
1985
Goodspeed, E.J.
1945 'The Didache, Barnabas and the Doctrina', ATR 27: 228-47.
Harrington, W.
1984 Mark (Dublin: Veritas, 3rd edn [1979]).
Harris, J. Rendel
1887 The Teaching of the Apostles (London: C.J. Clay & Sons).
Holmes, M.W. (ed.)
1992 The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations (Grand Rapids:
Baker Book House [updated revision of J.B. Lightfoot and J.R. Harmer;
London, 1891]).
Horbury, W.
1998 'Early Christians on Synagogue Prayer and Imprecation', in Stanton and
Stroumsa 1998: 296-317.
Jasper, R.C.D., and G.J. Cuming
1980 Prayers of the Eucharist: Early and Reformed (London: Geoffrey Chapman,
2nd edn).
Jefford, C.N.
1989 The Sayings of Jesus in the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (Leiden: E.J.
Brill).
1995 The Didache in Context: Essays on its Text, History and Transmission
(Leiden: E.J. Brill).
Krawutzcky, A
`Ueber die sog. Zwolfapostellehre, ihre hauptsachlichsten Quellen and ihre
1884
erste Ausnahme', TQ 4: 547-606.
Maher, M.
`The Merit of the Father and the Treasury of the Church', ITQ 46: 256-75.
1979
Matera, F.J.
1987 What are They Saying about Mark? (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press).
Meloni, P., and R.J. De Simone
1992 'Fasting and Abstinence', in A. di Berardino (ed.), The Encyclopedia of
the Early Church, I (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co): 319.
Metzger, B.M.
1975 A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament (London: United Bible
Societies).
Middleton, R.D.
`The Eucharistic Prayers of the Didache', JTS 36: 259-67.
1935
Milavec, A.
`Distinguishing True and False Prophets: The Protective Wisdom of the
1994
Didache', JECS 2: 117-36.
Niederwimmer, K.
The Didache: A Commentary (Minneapolis: AugsburgFortress).
1998
Nodet, E., and J. Taylor
The Origins of Christianity: An Exploration (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical
1998
Press).
O'Loughlin, T.
`Res, Tempus, Locus, Persona: Adomnan's Exegetical Method', Innes
1997
Review 48: 95-111.
`Theologians and their Use of Historical Evidence: Some Common Pitfalls',
2001
The Month 261: 30-35.
Osiek, C.
1999 The Shepherd of Hermas (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
Quin, E.G. (ed.)
1983 Dictionary of the Irish Language Based Mainly on Old and Middle Irish
Materials (Dublin: The Royal fish Academy).
Roberts, C.H.
1979 Manuscript, Society, and Belief in Early Christian Egypt (Oxford: Oxford
University Press).
Roberts, C.H., and T.C. Skeat
1983 The Birth of the Codex (London: The British Academy/Oxford University
Press).
Rordorf, W.
1968 Sunday: The History of the Day of Rest and Worship in the Earliest Centuries of the Christian Church (London: SCM Press).
112
Christian Origins
Rothenbuhler, E.W.
1998 Ritual Communication: From Everyday Conversation to Mediated Ceremony (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
Schaff, P.
1886 The Oldest Church Manual Called the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles
(New York: Funk & Wagnalls).
Schiirer, E.
1979 The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (ed. G. Vermes,
F. Millar and M. Black; Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark).
Skeat, T.C.
1994 'The Origin of the Christian Codex', ZPE 102: 263-68.
1997 'The Oldest Manuscript of the Four Gospels', NTS 43: 1-34.
Smith, J.Z.
1990 Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the
Religions of Antiquity (London: School of Oriental and African Studies).
Snyder, G.F.
1992 `Hermas's The Shepherd', in ABD, III: 147-48.
Sproul, B.C.
1987 'Sacred Time', in M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion (London:
Macmillan), XII: 535-44.
Stanton, G.N., and G.G. Stroumsa (eds.)
1998 Tolerance and Intolerance in Early Judaism and Christianity (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press).
Talley, T.
1980-82
`Liturgical Time in the Ancient Church: The State of Research', SL 14: 3451.
Turner, V.
1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (Chicago: Aldine de
Gruyter).
Valantasis, Richard
1997 The Gospel of Thomas (London: Routledge).
Vermes, G.
1975 The Dead Sea Scrolls in English (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 2nd
edn).
Vokes, F.E.
1938 The Riddle of the Didache: Fact or Fiction, Heresy or Catholicism (London:
SPCK).
1964 'The Didache and the Canon of the New Testament', in F.L. Cross (ed.),
Studia Evangelica, 111.2: 427-32.
Voobus, A.
1968 Liturgical Traditions in the Didache (Stockholm: Estonian Theological
Society in Exile).
Christian Origins
Worship, Belief and Society
The Milltown Institute
and the Irish Biblical Association
Millennium Conference
edited by
Kieran J. O'Mahony
241
Executive Editor
Stanley E. Porter
Editorial Board
Craig Blomberg, Elizabeth A. Castelli, David Catchpole,
Kathleen E. Corley, R. Alan Culpepper, James D.G. Dunn,
Craig A. Evans, Stephen Fowl, Robert Fowler,
George H. Guthrie, Robert Jewett, Robert W. Wall
ISBN 0-8264-6264-2