Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

ScienceDirect
Procedia CIRP 17 (2014) 766 771

Variety Management in Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing


Systems

Analysis of Lubrication Strategies for Sustainable Machining during


Turning of Titanium Ti-6Al-4V alloy
Ibrahim Deiaba, c, Syed Waqar Razaa*,Salman Pervaiza, b
a American University of Sharjah, University City, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates
b Production Engineering Department, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
c School of Engineering, University of Guelph, ON, Canada
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +971-50-9778518 ;. E-mail address: b00043889@aus.edu, deputy2375@gmail.com

Abstract
The current drive for achieving the implementation of sustainability concepts in manufacturing calls for sustainable machining practices to be
adopted. A key area of research is the search for environmentally benign cooling strategies. Vegetable oils have often been proposed as
sustainable alternatives to the conventional synthetic emulsion coolants. Techniques like dry and cryogenic machining, minimum quantity
lubrication (MQL) and minimum quantity cooled lubrication (MQCL) have also been proposed. The current study investigates the effect of six
different strategies on the flank tool wear, surface roughness and energy consumption during turning of titanium Ti-6Al-4V using uncoated
carbide tool at certain speed and feed. The use of rapeseed vegetable oil in MQL and MQCL configuration turns out to be an overall sustainable
alternative. Thus confirming the promise predicted in the use of vegetable oil as a lubricant for machining.

2014 Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.


(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the International Scientific Committee of The 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the International Scientific Committee of The 47th CIRP Conference on
Systems in the person of the Conference Chair Professor Hoda ElMaraghy.

Manufacturing Systems in the person of the Conference Chair Professor Hoda ElMaraghy

Keywords: Sustainable Machining; Titanium Alloys; Lubrication; Cooling strategies

1. Introduction
Sustainability is a concept that has to be incorporated at all
of the three social, economic and environmental levels. For
the machining processes this is not complete without the
cutting process lubrication taken into the account. It was seen
that the role of lubricant consumption is of great importance in
the sustainability assessment of machining processes. Huge
amounts of cutting fluids consumption have been recorded in
countries, e.g. 100 million gallons a year in the U.S. and
75491 tons in Germany. In Japan very high consumption and
disposal costs were recorded [1,2].An estimate suggests that
almost 16% of the total manufacturing costs are comprised of
cutting fluid costs and when it comes to the machining of hard
to machine materials, they reach up to 20-30 percent [3,4].

1.2 Literature Review


Shokrani et al. [5] reviewed the previous work regarding
environmentally conscious machining. Most cutting fluids are
not biodegradable and contain various components, which can
cause environmental and health hazards. Dangerous bacteria
can grow and mix with the shop floor environment allowing
dangerous biocides to be present. Moreover, the frequently
used mineral oil is carcinogenic and can cause skin cancer.
Chlorinated and sulphurized additives are also present in the
shop-floor. The vaporized particles of such cutting fluids can
be readily inhaled by workers and cause severe damage while
their smell can make the work conditions uncomfortable [5,6].
Zhang et al. [6] stated that due to environmental concerns,
MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication) is often used but the

2212-8271 2014 Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the International Scientific Committee of The 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems
in the person of the Conference Chair Professor Hoda ElMaraghy
doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.112

Ibrahim Deiab et al. / Procedia CIRP 17 (2014) 766 771

low cooling capacity of air is a limitation to the utility of


MQL. A study was executed using MQCL (Minimum
Quantity Cooled Lubrication) with bio degradable vegetable
oil dry machining strategies. It was revealed that the tool life
increased by 1.57 times under MQCL. MQCL also offered
lower cutting forces due to better cooling and lubrication
performance along with 100% bio degradability and no
uncomfortable effects like bad smell etc.
Weinert et al. [7] stated that MQCL, unlike MQL, has not
been much used and further investigation is needed.
Improvements have to come in the lubrication process design
in terms of delivery system, cooling and lubrication
performance. Fratila and Caizar [8] studied face-milling of
AlMg3. Three lubrication strategies namely flood, dry and
MQL were used. MQL did not show much negative effect on
the outputs of interest that were surface roughness and cutting
power.
Kuram et al. [9] conducted milling operations on AISI304L aluminum using canola and sunflower based vegetable
oils with different percentages of EP additives. If surface
roughness and total cost are also considered, then the canola
based cutting fluid with higher EP additives perform better
overall.
Andriya et al. [10] explored the range of cutting forces
magnitudes and surface roughness in turning Ti-6Al-4V. For
surface roughness cutting velocity and feed were the most
significant.
Siniawski and Bowman [11] stated that dry machining and
minimum quantity lubrication are promising lubrication
techniques that need to be considered for new machine tool
systems. In particular, for systems where a single machine
tool is used for one component, these technologies propose
significant financial and environmental incentives.
Safian et al. [12] compared vegetable oil MQL with the dry
and flood cooling strategies using coolant with emulsion. The
study showed the significant effects of the cutting fluid and
type of adopted cooling strategy on tool life and tool wear and
that MQL produced the best results in terms of tool life.
Lawal et al. [13] reviewed various lubrication techniques
for machining processes and stated that it was impossible to
rank them based on the variety that lies in the work piece, tool
materials and the process itself. The MQL technique with
vegetable oil as a lubricant apparently offerd the best
environmental solution coupled with improved performance
as observed by researchers.
Venugopal et al. [14] studied the effect of cryogenic
cooling on the nature and growth of tool wear in uncoated
carbide cutting tools while turning titanium Ti-6Al-4V. The
importance of this study lies in the increased demand of
titanium alloys in various biomedical, engineering and other
applications. The wear mechanisms where significantly
reduced under the effect of cryogenic cooling thus promising
environmentally safe machining with better productivity.
Pusavec and Kopac [15] executed a life-cycle assessment
(LCA) of the Cooling Lubricating Fluids (CLFs). The LCA
revealed the significant potential of cryogenic machining
using LN2 (liquid nitrogen). The solid waste, acidification

767

and water usage would be reduced along with the global


warming potential. A comparative analysis showed that
cryogenic machining is more energy efficient.
Bermingham et al. [16] studied turning of Ti-6Al-4V,
using cryogenic coolants and high pressure emulsions turned
out to be effective coolants extending the tool life. However,
the high pressure water based emulsion offered a slightly
better tool life.
Hong et al. [17] found that cryogenic machining using LN2
tends causes the hardening of the work-piece at lower
temperature, which, in turn, is responsible for reducing the
frictional force making LN2 a suitable lubricant.
Burton and Jun [18] stated that the development and
evaluation of vegetable based metal working fluids or MWFs
has been the subject of a considerable amount of research in
recent years. Cetin et al. [19] stated that vegetable based
cutting fluids can replace the conventional cutting fluids. A
detailed study indicated that both the sunflower and canola
cutting fluids with extreme pressure additives (EP) additives
performed better for cutting and feed forces. For surface
roughness canola based fluid with EP additives and sunflower
based fluid without EP additives performed better.
Alves and Oliveira [20] a new formulation of 40% solution
of sulphonate caster oil in water and compared grinding
operations using neat oil, semi-synthetic oil and the new
vegetable oil based formulation which showed good
performance, high biodegradability and proved to be a good
corrosion resistance.
Kalyan Kumar and Choudhury [21] compared dry
machining with cryogenic machining and observed a
reduction in cutting forces by 14.83%. Cryogenic machining
outperformed dry cutting by 37.39% in terms of flank wear.
Nevertheless the N2 consumption was high, making the
process expensive.
1.2 Scope
The review of existing work clearly indicates that there is a
need for a detailed study investigating the effect of using
environmentally benign cooling/lubrication strategies. The
adoption of technologies such as cryogenic coolants and high
pressure emulsions is difficult for the industry because of the
lack of direct comparison research. Dry and cryogenic
machining, vegetable oil lubrication with MQL and MQCL
configuration are also such strategies. Hence the aim and
motivation for this work is to address the lack of direct
comparison research between such strategies, so that the make
the right decisions are made at the industrial level.
The novelty of this study lies in its simultaneous
comparison between six cooling strategies in three different
areas of performance. The focus is on finding the best
compromise between environment friendliness and cutting
performance. A challenging machining scenario would be
created by selecting a hard-to-machine material like Ti-alloy
and by using uncoated carbide insert. The results of this study
would serve as a basis to find the operating limits for using
uncoated carbide inserts.

768

Ibrahim Deiab et al. / Procedia CIRP 17 (2014) 766 771

2. Experimental Setup
The experimental setup involves the selection of a workpiece material, a cutting insert type and cutting conditions.
2.1 Work-Piece Material
The work-piece material selected for this study is
Titanium Ti6Al4V, because of its high strength, important
applications and the difficulty to machine it. Table1 shows the
material properties.
Table 1 Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V [22]
Property
Name
Value

Ultimate
Tensile
Strength
1020
MPa

Fatigue
Strength
@600 MPa
>10000000
cycles

Rockwell
hardness

Modulus
of
Elasticity

Elongation

33 HRC

120 GPa

14%

2.2 Cutting Insert Type

The flood cooling is provided using an external setup for


pumping with a flow-rate of 9 Liter/min. For the
administration of the MQL and MQCL using vegetable oil, a
stand-alone booster system is installed on the machine tool
which is capable of cooling the mist or air. A nominal oil flow
rate of 2.8 ml/min is to be supplied by the booster pump. The
vegetable oil used by this set up is ECOLUBRIC E200 by
Accu Svenska, a cold-pressed rapeseed oil type without
additives. Manufactured according to the Swedish National
Food Administration regulations, it consists of biodegradable
substances and is deemed fit for industrial use. The oil is
declared environmentally harmless and has a biodegradability
of 90% in 28 days [26]. The Runs were conducted on an XLLeader Model # BNC-2143X NC-lathe.
Table 3 Cutting Parameters

Parameter

Levels

Depth
of Cut
mm)

0.8

Length
of Cut
(mm)

40

The cutting insert used is an uncoated cemented


carbide turning tool insert (Grade: H13A). This grade offers
good toughness and abrasive wear resistance against Ti-alloys
and other metals [23] and major specifications are shows in
Table2.

Cutting
Speed
(m/min)
90
120

Feed
(mm
/rev)

Cooling Strategy

0.1
0.2

Dry
MQL (Veg. Oil)
MQCL (Veg. Oil)
Cooled Air
Flood
Cryogenic

Table 2 Specifications of uncoated carbide cutting tool insert [24].

Grade

Style

Size

Insert
Thickness

Nose
Radius

No.
of
Edges

ISO
Number

H13A

CCMT

3(2.5)2

0.156 in

0.032

CCMT
09 T3
08-KM
H13A

2.3 Cutting Conditions


The six different prevalent or recommended lubrication
techniques will be evaluated include Flood Cooling, Dry
Machining, Vegetable Oil MQL Machining, Cooled Air
Lubrication, Cryogenic Machining (with liquid Nitrogen),
Vegetable Oil + Cooled Air / MQCL machining. The Design
Expert (8.0.7.1) package was utilized to carry out the design
of experiments. A total of 72 randomized runs were design
with variation of parameters. These runs include three blocks
for replicating the results. The cooling strategies are analyzed
against a mix of the High and Low levels of cutting speed and
feed, which have been selected so as to present a challenging
machining scenario yet close to the recommended machine
settings[25]. The results section includes the measuring of
flank tool wear Vb and average surface roughness Ra along
with the energy consumption of the process. The power
consumption would be recorded by using PowerSight
Manager (PSM) to be later on converted into energy
consumption. Figure.1 shows the set up.

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of experimental setup.

3 Results and Discussion


3.1 Tool Wear
When each parameter setting comprising of high
and/or low levels of cutting speed and feed are plotted versus
the lubrication techniques, the effects on the tool wear can be
seen. A closer look at each setting tells us that at low speed
and feed, which is the representative setting with the insert
and the study at hand, the best performance in terms of lowest
flank wear of the tool is given by the MQCL with vegetable
oil. Figure.2 shows this behavior using optical microscope.

769

Ibrahim Deiab et al. / Procedia CIRP 17 (2014) 766 771

3.2 Surface Roughness

Flank wear VB (mm)

It was seen that while the flood cooling technique


using a synthetic coolant outperforms others in general,
cryogenic machining follows closely and MQCL also offers
close results. The use of cooled air emerges as a better
alternative against dry machining and so does MQCL with
vegetable oil against MQL using the same. Even though the
cooled air used in this setup is not as cold and compressed as
conventional air cooling systems for machining plus
importance of nozzle configuration cannot be neglected in this
regard [6,7,27].
f1=0.1mm/rev, f2=0.1mm/rev,
v1=90m/min, v2=120m/min
0.7
Dry
Veg. Oil MQL
0.6
MQCL Veg. Oil
Cooled Air
0.5
Flood
Cryogenic
0.4
0.3

2.5
2

Ra (m)

Fig 2 Flank tool wear Vb at feed=0.1 mm/rev and speed = 90 m/min

The effect of changing parameters on the average surface


roughness (Ra) using various lubrication techniques can be
seen in Figure 3. It can be seen that at low feeds the surface
roughness is much less and increases slightly upon using
higher speed for same feed. Flood cooling appears to be the
lubrication of choice when using low feed but not for high
feed with cryogenic machining giving slightly better results.
At high speed, however, the use of cooled air as lubricant
emerges as the better alternative. However, at low speed, it
does not yield good surface finish [29]. It is also visible that in
low feed cases, the surface roughness achieved through all
techniques are close to each other, a trend not found at high
feed. Moreover, an important point to note is the promise
shown by both MQL and MQCL using vegetable oil over all.
Referring back to Figure 3, we saw that high-feed-high-speed
setting yielded very high tool wears (above 0.4 mm)
compared to other settings in some strategies. This high wear
is responsible for generating a smoother surface than high
feed low speed case while incorporating dimensional
inaccuracy, which means the material removed is reduced as
the turning progresses.

1.5

f1=0.1mm/rev, f2=0.1mm/rev,
v1=90m/min, v2=120m/min
Dry
Veg. Oil
MQL
MQCL Veg.
Oil
Cooled Air
Flood
Cryogenic

0.2
0.5

0.1
0

f1v1

f2v1
f1v2
Parameter Settings

f2v2

Fig 3 Tool Wear with lubrication techniques

Another observation is that unless the speed and feed


are both at their higher levels, the tool wear for all techniques
remains below or close to 0.3mm [28]. However the surge in
the resulting tool wear at the high-feed-high-speed
combination suggests that perhaps this combination is not
appropriate for titanium machining using an uncoated carbide
tool. This applies to cases of strategies other than flood and
cryogenic strategies and MQCL to some extent. Figure 3 is a
bar chart showings these effects.

f1v1

f2v1

f1v2

f2v2

Parameter Settings
Fig 4 Surface Roughness with Lubrication Techniques

3.3 Effect on Energy Consumption


The plot showing the effect of various lubrication
techniques on cutting energy consumption at various
parameter settings is given in Figure 4. It is clearly visible that
the MQL using vegetable oil provides the best lubrication and
thus yields lesser energy consumption for cutting. Vegetable
oil MQCL also shows good results overall again due to the
good lubricity provided by it. Also, cryogenic machining
closely follows this trend except at the low feed and speed

770

Ibrahim Deiab et al. / Procedia CIRP 17 (2014) 766 771

case. However cooled air performs better than flood and dry
machining overall with dry machining as the least suitable
alternative. It is also observable that the cutting energy
consumption increases with decrease in feed.
f1=0.1mm/rev, f2=0.1mm/rev, v1=90m/min,
v2=120m/min
0.035
Dry

Veg. Oil MQL

0.03

MQCL Veg. Oil


Cooled Air

Cutting Energy (kWh)

0.025

Flood
Cryogenic

0.02

0.015
0.01

0.005
0
f1v1

f2v1

f1v2

Parameter Settings

f2v2

booster pumps required for the small flow of vegetable oil and
air mixtures are way lighter than the pumping system required
for flood cooling technique. Although flood cooling technique
is the more prevalent practice in the industry these days, this
study shows that it is feasible to use the sustainable alternative
of vegetable oil, especially at feeds and speeds close to 0.1
mm/min and 90 m/min respectively, for Titanium. This means
it would be sustainable by default for softer metals and alloys.
The application of cooled air as a lubricant also appeared to
be effective as presented in the literature. Especially when
compared with dry machining, it turns out to be a good
alternative. Moreover, following the trends shown in
literature, Cryogenic machining also turned out to be a
recommendable alternative by outperforming flood cooling at
the overall three levels, even at higher feed and speed. While
in cutting energy consumption its performance was inferior to
vegetable oil, low tool wear achieved at higher feed and
speed. The cost to effectiveness aspect needs to be further
investigated for cryogenic and vegetable oil booster system. It
would, however, be appropriate to further execute this study
using a coated carbide grade because, while the aim was to
push for challenging machining scenarios, the higher speed
selected might be a little more than an uncoated tool can deal
with. Hence, further studies, perhaps with detailed LCA can
follow with more detail and wider range of parameters.

Fig 5 Cutting Energy Consumption with Lubrication Techniques.

Acknowledgements
Looking at Figures 3, 4 and 5 together tells about the overall
performance of the lubrication techniques. It can be seen that
the vegetable oil MQL and MQCL techniques provide
promising results in terms of tool wear and surface roughness
and supersedes the other in terms of cutting energy
consumption as well. Owing to the efficient coolant delivery
and good lubricity offer in these techniques, sustainable
results like better quality of surface, less tool wear and least
energy consumption are yielded. Especially, at lower feeds
and speeds, MQCL of vegetable oil is very promising, thus
confirming that the use of vegetable oil in machining is a
sustainable practice in comparison with others. Also that, the
smaller wattage of the booster pump for ECOLUBRIK is
another advantage against the normally prevalent flood
cooling technique using a heavier pump.
The results also show the high effectiveness of cryogenic
machining using liquid nitrogen as a highly recommendable
alternative at all the levels. However, the high cost associated
with the supply of liquid nitrogen cooling system in
comparison with the vegetable oil booster system still remains
an issue. The tradeoff appears to be in the cooling temperature
where the small booster system cannot provide temperatures
as low as in cryogenic or conventional low temperature air
cooling systems for machining.
4. Conclusions
The often proposed use of vegetable oil as a machining
lubricant in both MQL and MQCL configuration was tested in
Titanium turning. It was found to be a more sustainable
alternative to synthetic cooling in terms of tool wear, surface
quality and cutting energy consumed combined. Also that the

Authors sincerely acknowledge the support provided by


National Research Foundation (NRF) and Accu Svenska AB.
References
[1]

Feng S, and Hattori M. Cost and Process Information


Modeling for Dry Machining. In Proc. of the International
Workshop for Environment Conscious ManufacturingICEM-2000, 2000.
[2]
Klocke F, and Eisenbltter G. Dry Cutting. CIRP
Ann. - Manuf. Technol., 1997; 46(2): 519 - 526.
[3]
Pusavec F, Kramar D, Krajnik P, and Kopac J.
Transitioning to sustainable production part II:
evaluation of sustainable machining technologies. J.
Clean. Prod., 2010; 18(12): 12111221.
[4]
Scholta E. Environmentally Clean Machining
Processes - A Strategic Approach. CIRP Ann. - Manuf.
Technol., 1993; 42(1): 471 - 474.
[5]
Shokrani A, Dhokia V., and Newman ST.
Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-tomachine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int. J.
Mach. Tools Manuf., 2012;57: 83101.
[6]
Zhang S, Li JF, and Wang YW. Tool life and cutting
forces in end milling Inconel 718 under dry and minimum
quantity cooling lubrication cutting conditions. J. Clean.
Prod., 2012; 32: 8187.
[7]
Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, and
Wakabayashi T. Dry Machining and Minimum Quantity

Ibrahim Deiab et al. / Procedia CIRP 17 (2014) 766 771

Lubrication. CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., 2004;53: 511


537.
[8]
Fratila D, and Caizar C. Application of Taguchi
method to selection of optimal lubrication and cutting
conditions in face milling of AlMg3. J. Clean. Prod., 2011;
19(6-7): 640645.
[9]
Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M, Demirbas E,
and Simsek BT. Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting
parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design
of experiments. J. Clean. Prod. , 2013; 42:159166.
[10]
Andriya N, Rao P, and Ghosh S. Dry Machining of
Ti-6Al-4V using PVD Coated TiAlN Tools. Proceedings
of The World Congress on Engineering, London, UK,
2012;14921497.
[11]
Siniawski M, and Bowman C. Metal working fluids:
finding green in the manufacturing process. Ind. Lubr.
Tribol., 2009; 61(2):6066.
[12]
Safian S, Hisyam MA, and Aman S. Evaluation Of
Vegetable Oil As An Alternative Cutting Lubricant When
End Milling Martensitic Stainless Steel Using Uncoated
Carbide Tool. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2009; 3(2): 4956.
[13]
Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, and Nukman Y. A critical
assessment of lubrication techniques in machining
processes: a case for minimum quantity lubrication using
vegetable oil-based lubricant. J. Clean. Prod., 2013;
41:210221.
[14]
Venugopal KA, Paul S, and Chattopadhyay AB.
Tool wear in cryogenic turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
Cryogenics (Guildf)., 2007; 47(1):1218.
[15]
Puavec F, and Kopa J. Sustainability Assessment:
Cryogenic Machining of Inconel 718. Strojniki Vestn. J.
Mech. Eng. , 2011; 57(09) 637647.
[16]
Bermingham MJ, Palanisamy S, Kent D, and
Dargusch MS. A comparison of cryogenic and high
pressure emulsion cooling technologies on tool life and
chip morphology in Ti6Al4V cutting. J. Mater. Process.
Technol., 2012; 212(4):752765.
[17]
Hong SY, Ding Y, and Jeong W. Friction and cutting
forces in cryogenic machining of Ti6Al4V. Int. J. Mach.
Tools Manuf., 2001; 41(15):22712285.
[18]
Burton G, and Jun MBG. Feasibility of Vegetable
Oil in Water Emulsion Achieved through Ultrasonic
Atomization as Cutting Fluids. 40th North American
Manufacturing Research Conference, 2012; 251-258.

771

[19]
Cetin MH, Ozcelik B, Kuram E, and Demirbas E.
Evaluation of vegetable based cutting fluids with extreme
pressure and cutting parameters in turning of AISI 304L by
Taguchi method. J. Clean. Prod., 2011; 19(17-18):2049
2056.
[20]
Alves S, and Oliveira JDe. Vegetable based cutting
fluidan environmental alternative to grinding process.
15th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle
Engineering, Sydney, Australia. 2008;664-668.
[21]
Kalyan Kumar KVBS, and Choudhury SK.
Investigation of tool wear and cutting force in cryogenic
machining using design of experiments. J. Mater. Process.
Technol. 2008; 203(13): 95101.
[22]
Arcam AB Inc., Ti-6Al-4V [Online]. Available:
http://www.arcam.com/wp-content/uploads/ArcamTi6Al4V-Titanium-Alloy.pdf. [Accessed: 28-Mar-2012].
[23]
Sandvick, Cutting materials: General Information
[Online].
Available:
http://www2.coromant.sandvik.com/coromant/pdf/smallpar
ts/catalogue/P127-132.pdf. [Accessed: 23-Oct-2012].
[24]
Sandvick Coromant turning insert [Online].
Available: http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/SANDVIKCOROMANT-Carbide-Turning-Insert-5CCR9. [Accessed:
23-Oct-2012].
[25]
Donachie M. Titanium: a technical guide, ASM
International, Materials Park, OH, 1988. p. 75-78.
[26]
ACCU-Svenska AB, Material Safety Data Sheet
(according to EU Directive 91/155/EEC) ECOLUBRIC
E200L, pp. 13 [Online]. Available: http://www.accusvenska.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ECULUBRICE200L-CAS-8002-13-9-eng.pdf. [Accessed: 25-Jan-2012].
[27]
Boswell B, and Chandratilleke TT. Air-Cooling
Used For Metal Cutting. Am. J. Appl. Sci., 2009; 6(2):
251262.
[28]
ISO, Tool-Life Testing with Single-Point Turning
Tools, 1993, ISO 3685:1993. International Standard 1993
(2).
[29]
Su Y, He N, Li L, Iqbal A, Xiao MH, Xu S, and Qiu
BG. Refrigerated cooling air cutting of difficult-to-cut
materials. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2007;47(6): 927
933.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen