Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tiffany Ah Tye
3/20/2014
by the time that its discovered it may already be too late to return to
having crops full of completely natural food. In fact, nearly 88
percent of corn in America is GMO; and thats mainly because GM corn
seeds get caught in the wind and blow over to other natural corn
farms, contaminating those farms and cross breeding with the
natural corn.
Recently, one of the larger debates on GM foods has been
whether or not GM foods should be labeled as such. As of now, there
are some states that require GM foods to be labeled. However, there
are others, such as Washington, in which the bill to label GMO foods did
not pass and this is mostly due to indoctrination by GM companies.
Companies that use GMO produce in their products do their best to
argue against GM food labeling because it may deter some from
buying their products. In the state of Washington, Monsanto pumped
4.6 million dollars into ads campaigning against the bill that would
require GMO labeling (Ryan, 2013). These companies are afraid that
the truth about GMO products will finally be available to the public eye
the truth that while GMOs are currently untested and therefor
harmless, there have been more and more experiments that have
shown that GMO foods do more harm than good.
GM crops are advertised by its supporters as being great
because they are resistant to the growth of weeds, and other parasites.
This means that there would be more crop yield from the crops, as they
dont lose as much to parasites. Unfortunately, it has been found that
because of this, and because we end up eating these GM crops, weve
become more resistant to viruses and infections. While this usually
wouldnt be a bad thing, it hasnt made us resistant enough to the
point of being completely immune and because of this, viruses are
getting stronger than the antibiotics that we are taking for them.
Basically, medicine cant keep up with the resistance of the viruses,
thus making each virus more dangerous as it develops.
Thenaturalrevolution.org states that Americans are ill informed about
GM crops and their disadvantages, as mainstream media has failed to
report on the health detriments of GM crops. They stated, The only
human GM feeding study ever published shows that the foreign genes
inserted into GM food crops can transfer into the DNA of our gut
bacteria. (Smith) This is especially concerning because, as the website
states, this is a literal translation of the statement you are what you
eat. Basically, GM crops are slowly changing us from the inside as we
eat them, and most people are completely oblivious to this fact. If
there were truly nothing to be afraid of from GM foods, then the
companies that use GMO products wouldnt be pressing so hard to
leave it off the labels.
Another major contention point in the debate about GMOs is the
economic factor. While this was supposed to be GMOs biggest selling
point, it has fallen flat. The promised economic gains of growing and
producing GM products have not shown themselves yet, and do not
look like they will show themselves any time soon. In the 2009 Fact
Sheet from the Institute for Responsible Technology, it was revealed
that prices had risen steeply for GMO crops such as soybeans and corn
from the years 2006-2008. This opposes what GMO companies
originally stated would happen; they said that prices would fall,
because the crops would be more resistant to disease and rot. This has
obviously not happened yet. Farmers with GMO crops are struggling to
make money because the price of Monsantos seeds are so high.
However, as Monsanto is one of the largest GMO crop producers in the
world, many farmers feel that they have no choice but to go along with
the new flow.
Monsanto is slowly weeding out the farmers that havent
switched over to their GMO crops, especially for crops such as wheat,
soybeans, and corn. One of the largest problems for these farmers is
that if a crop next to theirs, or even miles away is growing GMO crops,
then the GMO seedlings can be caught up in the wind and carried to
the non-GMO farm. In a news article from the Huffington Post, it was
stated, Monsanto [has] filed 144 patent-infringement lawsuits against
farmers between 1997 and April 2010, and won judgments against
farmers it said made use of its seed without paying required royalties.
(Gillam) This is extremely unfortunate, because how the lawsuit works
is that once the farmers lose, they are instantly required to pay back
all royalties that they would have had to pay over the years. This is
usually impossible for farmers, as most of the farms that Monsanto
sues are small and family-owned and when the farmers cant pay,
Monsanto simply takes their crops as collateral.
GM crops are often advertised as being the next big thing;
GMO companies have touted GM crops, often stating that in the future,
GMO crops could end up bringing world hunger to an end because they
will be cheaper, and easier to grow because they dont need to be
tended to as much, and would be stronger and more robust. As
mentioned above, from an economic standpoint, GM crops dont hold
much merit right now. Also, Internationally, many countries in
particular the European Union have expressed a reluctance to accept
GM food and feed grains, in contrast to the quick adoption of GM
agriculture by US farmers. (Quaim and Janvry) If foreign nations refuse
to buy GM crops and food, how is it supposed to help them?
Furthermore, Developing countries often have very different climates,
soils, and agricultural practices than the locations in which GM crops
were originally developed, and some people question whether GM
crops could actually be profitable for third world agriculture. (Quaim
and Janvry) There are also concerns about GM crops in the fact that
some have been developed to be terminator crops the seeds from
terminator crops can only be used once, and seeds cannot be sown
from the harvest, causing them to have to be bought again and again.
This doesnt seem beneficial to the economy in fact, it doesnt seem
anything but harmful. As stated in Genetic Modified Foods:
Advantages and Disadvantages, This would be financially disastrous
for farmers in third world countries who cannot afford to buy seed each
year and traditionally set aside a portion of their harvest to plant in the
next growing season. (Mogilna and Mugafwa, 1)
Perhaps one of the largest fears about GM crops, though, is that
we will eventually become completely dependent on them. Already
from the lawsuits that Monsanto has filed, it has become clear that
farmers of natural seeds can do nothing to stop GM seeds from
creeping into their fields and taking over with their genetically superior
models. This is a major problem, because soon there will be no
natural food anymore if this continues, everything will have to be
GM. Even crops that arent GM are affected by this deadly transition;
because the other GM crops are so resistant to weeds and insects, the
weeds and insects that attack crops are becoming stronger by process
of natural selection, and they find it easier to prey on the non-GM
crops. This complete takeover is potentially deadly, as GMOs have not
been studied in depth; if there were any long-term effects, it would
already be too late to go back by the time that we found out about
them. In an article by the International Service for the Acquisition of
Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), it was stated, A major
10
movement may say that feeding cows corn is the solution to our noland problem; as of now, we do not have enough land to allow all cows
to be grass-fed. Corn solves that problem because the cows can now
be kept in pens. It also allows them to fatten up quicker, as well as
decreasing their lifespan. In an interview with Michael Pollan, he says,
We're taking cows that we used to let grow to be four or five years old
before we eat them [and] we've got it down to 14 months, and we're
heading toward 11 months.
Pollan, who is a professor of journalism at the UC Berkeley
graduate school of Journalism, is also an expert on GM crops and their
detrimental effects on our food chain. In his interview about their
negative effects on cows, he says that corn is not a cows natural diet.
He says, Corn is just too rich, too starchy. So as soon as you introduce
corn, the animal is liable to get sick. This then means that as soon as
the cows start on their diet of corn, farmers end up pumping them full
of antibiotics. The problem with this is the same as above with the GM
crops. They are pumped full of antibiotics, and when we eat their meat,
we in turn are unknowingly digesting those antibiotics as well, causing
viruses to become even stronger without the medical world even
knowing it.
Some say that GM crops are furthering our technological future.
In fact, there was a new type of tomato that was recently produced
that is purple, and has the nutrition of a blueberry. However, one of the
11
larger questions to counteract this is, Are we really doing the right
thing? Should we be taking the course of nature into our own hands?
While these GM crops may eventually go on to feed the hungry, it is
still not going to solve world hunger. In fact, if our world worked
differently, world hunger would already be solved. Today there is
enough food in circulation to feed everyone in this world. However, it is
simply the distribution of the food that causes problems. Third world
countries dont have as much food because they dont have enough
money; so far, GM crops have yet to show that they can fix this
problem. If anything, they would make it worse with the suicide gene
that they introduce to many of their crops which forces farmers to keep
buying seeds instead of sowing them from their last harvest. Therefore,
from an economic standpoint GM crops would most likely not change
the fact that people are going hungry in third world countries. From a
social standpoint, GM crops arent amazing either; because of the risk
of unknown health problems that they can cause, GM foods arent a
completely stable alternative for our food chain to fall back on. Also, if
GM foods are truly the route of our future, our future may look bleak
indeed. The animals that we eat will be cooped up inside of pens and
eating food that is unnatural to their natural diet; crops will no longer
be genetically diverse, but instead engineered to look and taste
completely the same. If GM crops continue to persevere in their search
to take over the future of food, our world may never be the same.
Annotated Bibliography
Dean, A., & Armstrong, J. (2008, May 8). Genetically Modified Foods.
Position Paper:: The American Academy of Environmental
Medicine (AAEM). Retrieved March 17, 2014, from
http://www.aaemonline.org/gmopost.html
12
13
Entine, J., & Wendel, J. (2013, October 14). 2000+ reasons why GMOs
are safe to eat and environmentally sustainable. Forbes.
Retrieved March 18, 2014, from www.Forbes.com
Instancing: I used this article when I was counter arguing the fact that
GM foods were tested for allergens. This was useful to me because the
article skirted around the fact that GM crops werent necessarily tested
for specific allergens, just new allergens in general.
Gillam, C. (2013, June 10). Monsanto wins lawsuit filed by U.S. organic
farmers worried about seed contamination. The Huffington Post.
Retrieved March 21, 2014, from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/monsanto-winslawsuit_n_3417081.html
Background: I used this source to provide a quote that gave
background information as to the number of lawsuits that Monsanto
won against farms who didnt pay for their seeds.
GM crops and the environment. (2012, July). GM Crops and the
Environment. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from
14
http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/4/
Argument: I used this source to back up my argument about the
detriments of accidental cross-contamination that could happen with
GMOs. This article was helpful because it came from a reputable
source, and thus ensured that my argument was valid.
Janvry, A., & Quaim, M. (2003, July 24). The Economy: Who makes the
money. The Economy: Who Makes the Money. Retrieved March
21, 2014, from
http://www.scienceandsociety.emory.edu/GMO/Economics.ht_
Argument: I used this article to argue that GMO crops arent really
helping the economy. It helped by providing the specific fact that
European countries didnt want to deal with GMOs.
15
Rasmussen, B., Jarchow, M., Ohde, N., Malual, J., & Wells, B. (n.d.). The
debate on labeling Genetically Modified food. Retrieved March
20, 2014.
Exhibit: This is a source that backs up my claim that GM crops may be
bad for your health. This article was cited in many other articles about
GM crops and health, and I used it because it came from a university,
and was therefore a reputable source.
Ryan, J. (2013, September 10). Monsanto pours $4.6 million into antiGMO labeling campaign. Retrieved March 16, 2014.
Background: I used this source to support my background information
on how much money major GMO companies like Monsanto pumped
16
Smith, J. M. (2007). The good, bad and ugly about GMOs. Natural
Revolution. Retrieved March 21, 2014, from
http://naturalrevolution.org/gmo-resources/the-good-bad-andugly-about-gmos/
Argument: I used this source to back up my argument about the fact
that GM crops are basically changing us from the inside. It was used to
instill fear into the readers mind that we dont exactly know what GM
crops are doing to us.