Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Manufactured in Pakistan
LIAQAT ALI QURESHI*, AND SAEED AHMED*
ABSTRACT
In this paper, investigation regarding impact of fineness of cement on properties of
concrete is reported for cement manufactured by five different factories. Clinker was
collected from a selected batch of each factory. It was ground along with 4% gypsum in
a laboratory ball mill. From each factory, six cement samples with different fineness
values were prepared. In order to confirm uniformity of their oxide ratios, their chemical
composition was analyzed by XRF-Cement Spectroscopy. Grinding time for each sample
was recorded by the built-in timer of ball mills. From the prepared samples, consistency
tests of all the samples were performed in the laboratory. Concrete cubes having same
mix. and water cement ratios were cast and tested for compressive strength at the age
of 3, 7, and 28 days. In order to have an idea of workability, slump test and compacting
factor tests were carried out on concrete mixes prepared to cast test cubes. Comparisons
were made between fineness of cement versus consistency of cement, compressive
strength, slump, compacting factor of concrete, and grinding time. Mathematical
relationships between fineness of cement and these parameters were established by
using "Least Square Regression Method". Relative study of cost of grinding against
desirable properties of cement & concrete at higher fineness levels was also conducted.
Key Words:
1.
INTRODUCTION
549
2.
3.
TEST PROGRAMME
3.1
Chemical Composition
3.2
Consistency Test
3.3
cement samples.
mixes.
550
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
3.3.1
Coarse Aggregates
3.3.2
Batch -3 = Pan
Fine Aggregates
Fineness
(cm2/g)
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
Na 2O
SO3
K2 O
TiO 2
Mn 2O3
1525
21.42
5.30
3.14
62.85
1.83
0.24
2.63
0.86
0.31
0.04
2065
21.58
5.29
3.15
63.28
1.79
0.23
2.67
0.85
0.32
0.04
2495
21.48
5.26
3.13
62.85
1.77
0.24
2.60
0.84
0.31
0.05
3048
21.60
5.37
3.20
63.27
1.79
0.24
2.72
0.87
0.32
0.04
3355
21.54
5.33
3.16
62.85
1.80
0.24
2.64
0.86
0.32
0.04
3741
21.56
5.31
3.18
62.95
1.82
0.24
2.66
0.85
0.32
0.05
1690
20.34
5.28
3.01
62.10
2.64
0.28
2.46
0.98
0.34
0.04
2083
20.29
5.25
2.97
62.03
2.63
0.28
2.49
0.99
0.33
0.04
2556
20.32
5.28
2.99
62.17
2.62
0.29
2.46
0.99
0.33
0.04
2912
20.28
5.28
2.99
62.09
2.64
0.28
2.54
0.99
0.33
0.04
3315
20.29
5.26
3.00
62.04
2.62
0.27
2.51
0.98
0.33
0.04
3773
20.27
5.26
3.01
61.89
2.59
0.28
2.58
0.99
0.33
0.04
1548
20.72
5.52
3.28
63.55
1.50
0.28
2.69
0.93
0.33
0.04
2048
20.70
5.50
3.30
63.67
1.52
0.29
2.67
0.93
0.31
0.04
2468
20.76
5.54
3.32
63.45
1.50
0.28
2.55
0.92
0.34
0.04
2964
20.78
5.56
3.32
63.65
1.52
0.29
2.51
0.93
0.33
0.05
3476
20.76
5.54
3.28
63.55
1.50
0.28
2.46
0.93
0.32
0.04
3883
20.80
5.52
3.26
63.65
1.50
0.28
2.44
0.93
0.33
0.04
1661
21.36
5.15
3.34
68.75
1.69
0.28
2.31
0.74
0.32
0.03
2028
21.48
5.13
3.34
63.85
1.68
0.28
2.32
0.75
0.32
0.04
2580
21.32
5.12
3.31
63.89
1.67
0.28
2.28
0.75
0.32
0.03
3033
21.36
5.10
3.35
63.62
1.71
0.28
2.28
0.74
0.32
0.03
3369
21.32
5.10
3.34
63.48
1.72
0.28
2.28
0.75
0.32
0.04
3674
21.38
5.10
3.34
63.53
1.71
0.28
2.27
0.76
0.32
0.04
1620
20.85
5.64
3.65
62.42
2.44
0.28
2.18
0.85
0.34
0.04
1945
20.76
5.57
3.70
62.05
2.41
0.26
2.59
0.85
0.33
0.04
2495
20.89
5.55
3.69
61.89
2.41
0.34
2.58
0.84
0.33
0.04
2860
20.88
5.51
3.65
61.90
2.43
0.32
2.67
0.84
0.33
0.04
3380
20.87
5.53
3.63
61.68
2.47
0.31
2.87
0.84
0.33
0.04
3727
20.90
5.36
3.56
62.13
2.39
0.35
2.74
0.78
0.33
0.04
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
551
3.4
4.
4.1
Consistency
552
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
Y = 0.0007 X + 23.12
(1)
(ii)
4.2
Compressive Strength
(iii)
FIG. 3. FINENESS OF CEMENT VERSUS 3-DAYS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE (COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT
FACTORIES)
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
553
(iv)
kilns.
FIG. 4. FINENESS OF CEMENT VERSUS 7-DAYS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE (COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT
FACTORIES)
FIG. 5. FINENESS OF CEMENT VERSUS 28-DAYS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE (COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT
FACTORIES)
554
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
Y = 0.6 X 1.01
(2)
Y = 13.59 X 0.71
(3)
(4)
FIG. 6. FINENESS OF CEMENT VERSUS 3-DAYS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE (AVERAGE TREND)
FIG. 7. FINENESS OF CEMENT VERSUS 7-DAYS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE (AVERAGE TREND)
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
555
4.4
Grinding Cost
(i)
FIG. 8. FINENESS OF CEMENT VERSUS 28-DAYS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE (AVERAGE TREND)
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
(ii)
this paper. .
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
5.
CONCLUSIONS
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the five cement
factories of Pakistan mentioned in the text for their
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]
557
[11]
558
[12]
[13]
[14]
MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 30, NO. 4, OCTOBER, 2011 [ISSN 0254-7821]