Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AbstractIn elastic optical networks (EONs), the modulation format can be configured to guarantee the required
optical reach with efficient spectrum utilization. For this
reason, the literature related to EONs has treated the problem of routing and spectrum assignment together with the
problem of modulation format assignment. Recently, in addition to modulation format, code adaptation has also been
successfully demonstrated to provide adequate spectrum
utilization given a target optical reach. This paper presents
the concept of routing, code, and spectrum assignment
(RCSA) for EONs. We propose the optimization of multiple
transmission parameters including code, subcarrier spacing, and filters passband to avoid detrimental filtering
effects. Measurements are carried out in an EON testbed
to identify the relation between transmission parameters
and the number of traversed filters and optical reach.
Then, the measurements are used as inputs in simulations
to test RCSA. The simulations show that code adaptation
reduces blocking probability with respect to format adaptation. Another interesting result shows that the use of
several possibilities for the transmission parameter setting
may induce high spectrum fragmentation.
Index TermsCode; EON; Flex-grid; RCSA; RSA.
I. INTRODUCTION
1943-0620/15/110B93-08$15.00/0
modulation (PM-16QAM). However, a transponder supporting both PM-QPSK and PM-16QAM can be more expensive than a transponder supporting only PM-QPSK.
Indeed, a transponder supporting multilevel modulation
formats such as PM-16QAM typically requires a digitalto-analog converter (DAC), while a DAC can be avoided
if only a single-level modulation format such as PMQPSK is supported [4]. Recently, distance adaptation
through code adaptation has been proposed [59]. An example is the time-frequency packing (TFP) transmission
technique, which is also capable of achieving very high
spectral efficiency (e.g., higher than 6 bits/s/Hz with PMQPSK) [5,10,11]. In particular, code redundancy is tuned
based on the optical reach (the larger the length, the
greater the redundancy). Code adaptation can be applied
with a transponder supporting a single modulation format
(e.g., PM-QPSK) [5]. Thus, code adaptation may provide
distance adaptation with the use of either single or multiple modulation formats. In other words, given a selected
modulation format, code adaptation provides high flexibility for achieving a given optical reach while minimizing the
occupied bandwidth [12].
The code drives the occupied bandwidth by an optical
connection, and thus it impacts on the spectrum assignment (SA) or on the routing and spectrum assignment
(RSA). Works on RSA have been done and are available
in the literature, considering both planning and dynamic
online RSA. Regarding planning, several integer linear
programming formulations or heuristics have been proposed to solve the RSA problem [1321]. Concerning
dynamic RSA, the authors of [22] proposed an RSA based
on least-congested routing and proposing a first-fit/last-fit
spectrum allocation, studied under varying grid spacing.
The authors of [23] proposed heuristics, including quality
of transmission (QoT) constraints. Other works (e.g., [24])
were focused on mitigating the spectrum fragmentation issue in online RSA, which creates suboptimal spectrum utilization, preventing the establishment of new connections.
The concept of modulation format assignment has been included in the RSA procedure [13], resulting in the routing,
modulation format, and spectrum assignment procedure
[25,26]. The authors of [8] propose an adaptive forwarderror-correction strategy considering static traffic. More
2015 Optical Society of America
AND
Sambo et al.
Sambo et al.
Sambo et al.
polarization scrambler (POL-S) is included in the loop, emulating random signal polarization variation. The Finisar
SSS emulates intermediate nodes. It is assumed to be a
broadcast-and-select node architecture [9], so traversing a
node implies a single filter stage, as in each loop. Coherent
detection at the receiver (RX), including local oscillator
(LOi), digital signal processing (DSP) with LDPC decoding,
as in [5], is applied with offline processing.
Table I shows the relation between the code rate, the optical reach, the number of traversed nodes (thus including
filtering), N, S, and m. Reported values satisfy error-free
transmission after LDPC decoding for all the subcarriers.
Measurements show that the slot width increases with the
optical reach and the number of traversed filters. This is
due to a combination of different factors. First, the increase
in the optical reach or the number of traversed filters may
require the use of a more robust code. This implies an increase in the number of subcarriers needed to satisfy the
net rate of 1 Tbit/s, and thus in the occupied bandwidth.
Second, with an increase of the number of traversed filters,
filtering effects become more detrimental, driving the
enlargement of filters to provide the passband in a more
flat region [5,31]. As an example, the use of c 45 implies
N 8 to guarantee the net rate. With such a code rate and
TABLE I
RELATION BETWEEN TRANSMISSION PARAMETERS OBSERVED
WITH MEASUREMENTS ON THE 160-KM-BASED RECIRCULATING
LOOP SHOWN IN FIG. 2
Reach
[km]
Traversed
Nodes
8/9
4/5
4/5
3/4
3/4
3/4
320
480
800
960
1120
1280
2
3
5
6
7
8
S
[GHz]
Slot
Width
[GHz]
7
8
8
9
9
9
23
22
23
22.5
23
24
14
15
16
17
18
19
175
187.5
200
212.5
225
237.5
Sambo et al.
m 15, a three-hop path with a length of 480 km is guaranteed with error-free transmission. A more robust code,
c 34 (implying N 9), and m 17 enable a path of
six hops and around 1000 km. Decreasing the value of m
with respect to the values reported in the table would cause
unacceptable filtering effects that would not guarantee
error-free transmission.
Another parameter reported in Table I is the subcarrier
spacing S. This parameter also has an important effect on
the QoT of the superchannel as well as on the spectral efficiency, and a proper trade-off should be found. As stated
earlier, subcarriers are electrically filtered at 10 GHz in the
base band, and thus with ideal filtering, channel spacing
could be 20 GHz in the optical domain. However, through
measurements, given the nonrectangular shape of the
electrical filters, S 20 GHz would cause an unacceptable
intercarrier interference, strongly degrading the superchannel QoT. Thus, S should be selected with a higher value.
S has been tested in the testbed with values in the range of
[20;24] GHz. Setting S to a low value is preferable in terms
of an occupied spectrum; however, intercarrier interference
may result in an unacceptable QoT. Setting S to a higher
value may also result in an unacceptable QoT, because although intercarrier interference would be reduced, external
subcarriers (i.e., the ones close to the transition bandwidth of
the SSS filters) may be cut. As an example, for a path of three
hops and 480 km, S has been set to 22 GHz. Figure 2 shows
the spectrum of the superchannel before the receiver with
S 21, S 22, and S 23 GHz. With S 21 GHz, subcarriers are more packed; however, error-free transmission is
not guaranteed. With S 23 GHz, error-free transmission
is not experienced due to the fact that external subcarriers
are cut by the optical filter SSS profile.
TABLE II
RELATION BETWEEN TRANSMISSION PARAMETERS OBSERVED
WITH MEASUREMENTS ON THE 80-KM-BASED RECIRCULATING
LOOP PRESENTED IN [32]
c
8/9
8/9
4/5
3/4
3/4
Reach
[km]
Traversed
Nodes
Slot Width
[GHz]
320
400
640
720
1500
4
5
8
9
12
7
7
8
9
9
12
13
14
15
16
150
162.5
175
187.5
200
V. SIMULATION RESULTS
Sambo et al.
Fig. 4. Blocking versus offered network load when code adaptation is applied.
Fig. 5. Blocking versus offered network load when formatadaptive Nyquist transmission uses PM-16QAM and PM-QPSK.
A first result reported in this paper is related to spectrum fragmentation [35]. In particular, transmission
characteristics of code-adaptive TFP shown in Table I enable up to six possibilities for transmission parameter setting, resulting in a different optical reach and spectrum
occupancy. Thus, six different transmission parameter
settings imply six different m values, even considering a
single rate of 1 Tbit/s. To show the effect on spectrum fragmentation, Fig. 4 reports the blocking probability versus
network load when code-adaptive transmission uses the
six possible configurations of Table I or a subset of them
as shown in Table III. Although six types of parameter settings offer more granularity than three types and, in theory,
should offer more possibilities for optimizing the reach and
the occupied spectrum, three settings achieve less blocking
than six settings. This is due to the more fragmented spectrum experienced when six slot width values can be selected.
For this reason, in the next simulations, code-adaptive TFP
refers to the transmission settings in Table III.
Reach [km]
Traversed
Nodes
S [GHz]
Slot Width
[GHz]
480
1120
1280
3
7
8
8
9
9
22
23
24
15
18
19
187.5
225
237.5
Fig. 6. Blocking versus offered network load when formatadaptive Nyquist transmission uses PM-16QAM, PM-8QAM, and
PM-QPSK.
Sambo et al.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
RCSA has been investigated in this paper. RCSA, the optimization of subcarrier spacing, and filter configuration
are designed with the aim of achieving high spectral
efficiency while guaranteeing QoT, also accounting for detrimental filtering effects. Measurements have been performed in an EON testbed based on a recirculating loop
to identify the relation between transmission parameters
and number of traversed filters and optical reach. Then,
measurements have been used as inputs in simulations
to test RCSA. Simulations have shown that code adaptation based on PM-QPSK TFP reduces blocking probability
with respect to format adaptation based on NWDM.
Simulations have also shown that the use of several possibilities for the transmission parameter settings, if used
with different values of the ITU-T parameter m, may induce high spectrum fragmentation. Future studies can investigate QoT models for code-adaptive transmission
considering different rates and modulation formats, network design of code-adaptive EONs with offline integer
linear programming or heuristics, and multirate codeadaptive EONs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the FP-7 IDEALIST Project
under grant 317999. This paper is an extended version
of the work presented in [32].
REFERENCES
[1] F. Cugini, G. Meloni, F. Paolucci, N. Sambo, M. Secondini, L.
Gerardi, L. Poti, and P. Castoldi, Demonstration of flexible
optical network based on Path Computation Element, J.
Lightwave Technol., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 727733, Mar. 2012.
[2] O. Gerstel, M. Jinno, A. Lord, and S. Yoo, Elastic optical networking: A new dawn for the optical layer? IEEE Commun.
Mag., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. s12s20, Feb. 2012.
[3] X. Cai, K. Wen, R. Proietti, Y. Yin, D. Geisler, R. Scott, C. Qin,
L. Paraschis, O. Gerstel, and S. Yoo, Experimental demonstration of adaptive combinational QoT degradation restoration in elastic optical networks, J. Lightwave Technol.,
vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 664671, 2013.
[4] N. Sambo, P. Castoldi, A. DErrico, E. Riccardi, A. Pagano,
M. S. Moreolo, J. M. Fabrega, D. Rafique, A. Napoli, S.
Frigerio, E. H. Salas, G. Zervas, M. Nolle, J. K. Fischer, A.
Lord, and J. P.-P. Gimenez, Next generation sliceable bandwidth variable transponders, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53,
no. 2, pp. 163171, Feb. 2015.
[5] N. Sambo, G. Meloni, F. Paolucci, F. Cugini, M. Secondini, F.
Fresi, L. Poti, and P. Castoldi, Programmable transponder,
code and differentiated filter configuration in elastic
optical networks, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 32, no. 11,
pp. 20792086, 2014.
[6] D. Mello, A. Barreto, T. de Lima, T. Portela, L. Beygi, and
J. Kahn, Optical networking with variable-code-rate
transceivers, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 257
266, 2014.
[7] I. Cerutti, F. Martinelli, N. Sambo, F. Cugini, and P. Castoldi,
Trading regeneration and spectrum utilization in code-rate
Sambo et al.
[27] Cisco ONS 15454 100 Gbps coherent DWDM trunk card,
Data Sheet [Online]. Available: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/
us/products/collateral/opticalnetworking/ons15454series
multiserviceprovisioningplatforms/data_sheet_c78713298
.pdf.
[28] D. Rafique, A. Napoli, S. Calabro, and B. Spinnler, Digital
preemphasis in optical communication systems: On the
DAC requirements for terabit transmission applications,
J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 32, no. 19, pp. 32473256, Oct.
2014.
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[30] ITU, Draft revised G.694.1 version 1.3, ITU-T Study Group
15, Question 6, Unpublished.