ISSN: 2277-3754

ISO 9001:2008 Certified
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 2, Issue 5, November 2012

Online Data Back-up and Disaster Recovery
Techniques in Cloud Computing: A Review
Kruti Sharma, Kavita R Singh
Computer Science Engineering, YCCE, Nagpur (M.S), 441 110, India
Abstract— Today, in electronic format data has been generated
in large amount that required the data recovery services. We know
that the cloud computing introduces a new type of computing
platform in today’s world. This type of computing will generates a
large amount of private data on main cloud. Therefore, the
necessity of data recovery services are growing day-by-day and it
requires a development of an efficient and effective data recovery
technique. The purpose of recovery technique is to help user to
collect information from any backup server when server lost his
data and unable to provide data to the user. To achieve this
purpose, many different techniques have been proposed till date.
In this review paper, we explore few recent techniques that are the
powerful solutions in the form of “Online Data Backup and
Disaster Recovery Techniques”. The objective of this review paper
is to summarize the powerful data backup recovery techniques
that are used in cloud computing domain.
Index Terms—Backup; Privacy; Central Repository; Remote
Repository, Parity cloud, Parity Cloud Service.

National Institute of Standard and Technology defines as a
model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to
a share pool of configurable computing service (for
example, networks, servers, storage, applications and
services) that can be provisioned rapidly and released with
minimal management effort or services provider [1]. Cloud
computing is no longer a buzzword today. In addition, it
changes and improves the way we uses the computing
In today’s world, there is a huge increase in the electronic
data. This requires large volume of data storage devices to
store this large amount of data. These requirement leads to
introduction of 3 Tera Byte HDD. Therefore, usually
consumer prefers to store large amount of private data in
cloud. Unfortunately, if cloud will be corrupted or damaged it
leads to the loss of all important and private data then there
should be some mechanisms to take back-up of the data, and
provide the data at the time of cloud failure or loss of data.
As we know that plain data back-up techniques are having
many reliability and security problems. However the plain
back-up techniques are not convenient and reliable as well. So
to overcome from plain data backup and recovery problem, it
requires more safe and effective system such as RAID
(Redundant Array Independent Disk), HSDRT [1], PCS [2],
ERGOT [3], Linux Box [5], Cold and Hot back-up technique
[6], SBBR [10], REN [17] etc. These systems provide high
privacy protection and reliability however some increases the
cost where as some are unable to maintain the implementation

complexity low. Although many backup and recovery
techniques have been proposed during last few years in the
computing domain; however, real world scenarios remain a
challenge. In this review paper, we focuses on the various
techniques of back-up and recovery on cloud computing.
Each technique is greatly affected in real time scenario either
in redundancy point of view or security point of view or
complex algorithm’s implementation point of view.
This paper is organized as follows: Section II explains the
need of cloud computing. In Section III we discuss about the
Remote Data Backup Server. The existing methods that are
successful to some extent in the cloud computing domain are
reviewed in Section IV. Finally, in Section V discussion and
conclusions are given.
Cloud computing provides on demand resources to the
consumer/user. It requires the management of resources
among each and every client/user. Such management includes
various aspects of proper utilization of the resources. The
resources can be any hardware or software. The software like
any application programming interface, application
development kit and any type of data file etc. Various choices
are there among various implementations for back up of the
data and that maintain its security among various users. Cloud
computing must be able to provide reliability such that users
can upload their sensitive and important data. The
cost-effective approach is the main concern while
implementing any cloud.
During the study of cloud computing, we found various
advantages of cloud computing. In advantages, we found that
the cloud is capable enough to store the huge amount of data
of various different clients with complete security such that
Internet Service Provider (ISP) provides a huge storage in a
cloud to the user. And users are allow to upload there private
and important data to the main cloud. And at the same time we
found critical issue regarding this storage i.e. if any of the
client’s data file is missing or disappeared for some reason or
the cloud get destroyed either due to any natural calamity (like
flood, earthquake etc.), then for back-up and recovery
consumer/client has to depend on service provider which
means the data has to be stored in the server.
To overcome problem of such scenario, it requires an
efficient technique for data backup and recovery so that the
client can able to contact the backup server where private data
is stored with high reliability and whenever a main cloud fails
to provide the user’s data. These techniques must possess the


And if the central repository lost The remote cloud must possess the reliability its data. November 2012 low cost as well for implementation of the recovery problem’s 3) Data security The client’s data is stored at central repository with solution and can easily recover the data after any disaster. Further. issues: There are many techniques that have focused on these 1) Privacy and ownership. recent techniques of back-up and recovery in cloud 3) Data security. if clients role. A. The cost for establishing the remote setup and for implementing its technique must be minimum such that small business can afford such system and large business can spend minimum cost as possible. then data to the client immediately whenever they required either clients are allowed to access the files from remote repository from main cloud or remote server. High Security Distribution and Rake Technology (HS-DRT) The HS-DRT [1] is an innovative file back-up concept. such that it provides the location transparency of relocated server to the clients and other third party while data is been shifted to remote server. Each of the technique has the complete focus on their aim of backup and recovery. 4) Reliability. In remote repository. computing domain. They are freely allowed to upload their private and essential data on the cloud. The Relocation of server means to transfer main server’s data to another server. 6) Appropriate Timing. 5) Cost effectiveness The cost for implementation of remote server and its recovery & back-up technique also play an important role while creating the structure for main cloud and its correspondent remote cloud. the time taken for such a retrieval must be minimum as possible such that the client can get the data as Fig. 6) Appropriate Timing The process of data recovery takes some time for retrieval of data from remote repository as this remote repository is far away from the main cloud and its clients. then it uses the information from the remote characteristics. The purpose is to help clients to collect stores the complete data and each client is dependent on the information from remote repository either if network main cloud for each and every little amount of data. In forthcoming section. Hence. 1. REN [17] that have addressed the aforesaid issues. Linux Box [5]. remote repository as well. Remote data Backup Server and its Architecture The Remote backup services should cover the following soon as possible without concerning the fact that remote repository is how far away from the client. The client nodes are composed of PCs. therefore connectivity is not available or the main cloud is unable to the cloud and remote backup cloud must play a trustworthy provide the data to the clients. which makes use of an effective ultra-widely distributed data transfer mechanism and a high-speed encryption technology. we found many techniques that are having their unique ways to create backup and recovery. such as cost controlling. REMOTE DATA BACK-UP SERVER Remote Data Backup server is a server which stores the unintentionally by third party or any other client. The clients get the data in same way as before without any intimation of relocation of main server. EXISTING METHODS In our literature survey. Second. (i. the main functions are Data Centre. however the new of location is unknown to the client. both the server must be able to provide the found that data is not available on central repository. all those techniques focus on three different aspects. main cloud’s entire data as a whole and located at remote 4) Reliability place (far away from cloud). data duplication and security issues. we will be discussing some of 2) Relocation of servers to the cloud. the data should be fully protected such that no access and harm can be made to the remote cloud’s data either intentionally or III. 1) Privacy and ownership Different clients access the cloud with their different login or after any authentication process. Cold and Hot back-up technique [6]. Broadly speaking. the privacy and ownership of data should be maintained. smart phones. Remote Server must maintain this Privacy and ownership. 5) Cost effectiveness. indirectly). 2) Relocation of server For data recovery there must be relocation of server to the cloud. Supervisory server and third. Owner of the data should only be able to access his private data and perform read. That’s why.ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2. That means. SBBR [10]. Network Attached Storage and storage 250 .e. Such a security should be followed in its for cloud computing arises due to heavy storage of its clients. Issue 5. PCS [2]. Because in cloud computing the main cloud repository. the need of the back-up and recovery techniques complete protection. issues. we detail few recent techniques HSDRT [1]. write or any other operation. IV. ERGOT [3]. various client nodes specified by admin. Therefore. It consists of 3 components: First. As shown in Fig 1.

the data recovery. Then. Note that the parity block reception procedure and they are decrypted. r. the Supervisory Server parity block is generated by XORing the new block and the starts the recovery sequence. For each VDPG. It collects the encrypted old block (Pt = Bnew _ Bold). and store parity data of parity group in cloud. node 2. S3 S4). divides into some fragmentations. After sending the initialize message. for B. These limitations are [2]: first one is that. On necessary to be well adjusted to use the HS-DRT engine. Nodei fully utilize the HS-DRT processor. On disk in user system for data backup. The PCS server sends Pr along with easy to use and more convenient for data recovery which is the list of nodes that will send their encoded data block to based on parity recovery service. PCS uses a new technique of generating virtual PCS server sends the message when they become on-line. it can be recovered using However there are some limitation in this model and the parity block provided by the PCS server and encoded data therefore. the needed to participate. Supervisory Server can recover the original data that should 3) Data Block Recovery: be backed-up. the 1st node (node 1) perfect solutions to backup and recovery due to some generates an intermediate parity block via r S1 and sends it limitations. and sends it to its successor. second is Recovery sequence. The bitmap is initialized (set to 0) after the service level. j i ) and sends to Exclusive–OR ( ) for creating Parity information. r. Otherwise. These are: First. and thereafter generation bitmap (PG-bitmap) . When a data block is corrupted. and update can be easily done by the data updating node and the descrambled in the reverse order at the second stage and the PCS server. that. and distribution the seed block (Pt = Bnew Si). In the updating process. Bin. the web applications are sends a recovery request message to the PCS server. the Data Center block (Bold) in nodei is to be updated to a new block (Bnew). the intermediate some disasters occur or periodically. sends the metadata used for deciphering the series of the Storage Manager refers to the corresponding value in the fragments. The initialization process occurs only once for The basic procedure in the proposed network system is each parity group. merged. In Recovery Sequence. the seed block (Si) is generated for virtual disk. the to its successor. by XORing the n-the data block with r algorithms for PCS work as follows by using the (Ej = Bin r. Parity Cloud Service Technique recovery process. PCS is based on Markov process and calculate Mean node 3 and so on. Issue 5. again at the second stage and distributes them to the client The PG-bitmap is referred when a block is updated. it is the recovery process when value in the PG-bitmap to 1. several related intermediate parity block (Pt) by XORing the new block with information of fragmentation. in order to that the n-th data block in nodei . Otherwise. P r. the nodei recovers the corrupted data block by 1) Initial Parity Generation: Bin = Pr E1 ··· Ei-1 Ei+1 ··· E |VDPG|. Then. has been corrupted. it encrypts The Storage Manager in PCS agent maintains parity scrambles. If it is 0. and a temporary parity block. nodei. The Data Center encrypts the fragmentations initialization process for any data block in the virtual disk. E. random block. the PCS server Second. More important finding in our literature survey is server from node 4 is XORed with the temporary random that the effect of the individual disk reliability varies block. For other nodes in the group. S2. November 2012 service [1]. it generates a temporary be degraded accordingly for executing the web application. Pr = Pn Parity Cloud Service technique (PCS) [2] is a very simple. When a nodes in a random order. They are connected with a supervisory server in seed blocks (((((r S1) S2) S3) S4) r = S1 S2 addition to the Data Centre via a secure network. The seed parity block stored separately as follows in two sequences one is Backup sequence and from in the metadata region of each virtual disk. Though these processes.It indicate whether the parity duplicates that data to some extents to satisfy with the block for each data block in the virtual disk has been required recovery rate according to the pre-determined generated or not. (1) In this. Note that the whole virtual disk corruption can be PCS server sends the initialize message to each Recovery recovered by iterating the above data block recovery process. this model is somehow unable to declare as perfect blocks provided by other nodes in the parity group. The encoded data block. to generate the seed parity block across all 251 .ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2. In Backup sequence. then the Storage Manager generates an (both at the first and second stages). Accordingly. Pr = Pn. each node generates their own virtual disk. When the size of the VDPG is even. when the 2) Parity Block Update: Data Center receives the data to be backed-up. for later use. Second limitation is block with its seed block. On receiving the r block. Assume solution for back-up and recovery. is that when the number of duplicated copy of file identifies to which VDPG the node belongs to and reads the data increases the corresponding processor performance will corresponding parity block. Manager in the group. The metadata are composed of encryption keys PG-bitmap. A PCS has low cost for nodei for recovery along with the IP address of node i to all recovery and can recover data with very high probability. If there are any off-line nodes. other nodes are not decryption will be completed. node 2 generates an recovery process cannot finish if one or more participating intermediate parity block via XORing the received parity nodes are not online at the recovery time. receiving the recovery request message. Pn. make parity groups across receiving the message. again. the PCS server fragmentations from various appropriate clients like rake also maintains the PG-bitmap. r. and set the corresponding [1]. Apart from its best performance given by the algorithm the PCS server sends temporary random block (r) to the first discussed above PCS somehow lags behind in providing node. At the same time. duplication. The final block transferred to the PCS time failure. for each node j VDPG.

An extensive evaluation of the system in concerns with the cost reduction concept there exist some different network scenarios demonstrated its efficiency both inconsistencies between logical and physical configurations in terms of accuracy of search and network traffic. The ERGOT system proposed semantic-driven failure and the most important factor it provides the network query answering in DHT-based systems by building a SON management system via multi-layer signaling . techniques. we found a available. The data transmission will Computing [15]. backup of the cloud onto local drives. that may lead to some performance problem. A enterprises and individuals are attracted towards low cost simple hardware box can do all these at little cost named as cloud services. Issue 5. it D. and then the first returned results of services will be include: 1) A DHT (Distributed Hash Table) protocol. It aims to level from the cloud service provider to the consumer.Rent Out the Rented Resources Another technique we found in the field of the data migration from one cloud service provider to other very easy. During the implementation of service. it is triggered upon the detection of the Semantic-based System for Service Discovery in Distributed service failures and it will not be triggered when the service is Infrastructures in cloud computing. enables the clustering of peer that have services and original services are executed at the same time. imposing a minimum number of with semantic similarity search models. November 2012 according to the group size.g. 3) A measure of semantic similarity among service basically focuses on the significant cost reduction and router description [4]. These components states. ERGOT is built upon 3 components. Generally. It reduce the monetary cost of cloud services.However it over a DHT. According to efficient retrieval of data that is completely based on the the availability and the current state of service composition semantic similarity between service descriptions and service before the services interrupt. The lowest cost point of view we found a simple Linux box which will sync up the data at block/file model “Rent out the Rented Resources” [17]. 3) It gives the monetary benefit only the Data but Sync the entire Virtual Machine[5] which with the large under-utilized technology infrastructure to the somehow waste the bandwidth because every time when established enterprises (cooperating ventures).e. However. it restores the service requests. it fails to precisely E. Keahey et. They have incorporates an application on Linux box that will perform proposed a three phase model for cross cloud federation. During subsequent check. rents it to the clients in form of cloud services.However. The limitation we found that a consumer can backup not cloud vendors to the clients. Cold and Hot Backup Service Replacement Strategy estimate the real data reliability of PCS. Additionally DHT-based systems perform exact-match searches with [10]. it using concepts from ontology. (CBSRS) In Cold Backup Service Replacement Strategy (CBSRS) C. however does not go well requirements that have a direct effect on the setting of the SBRR architecture (e. Hence.This model is based on concept of cloud be secure and encrypted. constructed incrementally. Shared backup router resources(SBBR) In one of our survey. DHTs and SONs both networks architectures have some failure scenario i. In our survey. ERGOT combines both these network connectivity that remains unchanged even after a router Concept. It also makes the process of G. It concerns IP logical shortcomings. as a product of service advertising F. we found that one technique via DHT. check for updates authentication. it backs up only the minimizes the cloud infrastructure cost. The SON is the recovery cost increases accordingly. 2) A SON (Semantic Overlay reduced service recovery time. It also exploits both coarse-grain service composition dynamically. In Hot Backup Service Replacement Strategy unique way of data retrieval. introduced the concept of Sky and sync them with local storage. On Comparing HBSRS with the CBSRS. 2) It provides low cost cloud services by reducing infrastructure cost for the incremental data to the local site. backup takes place it will do back-up of entire virtual machine. a transcendental recovery strategy for service technique as it is not a back-up technique but it provide an composition in dynamic network is applied [6]. After a valid login. As we It is affordable to all consumers and Small and Medium Business (SMB). backup is a REN (Research Education Network) cloud. 252 . network-wide shared router resources locations). which adopted to ensure the successful implementation of service we use to advertise semantic service description annotated composition. the backup services always remain in the activated functionality descriptions and at a finer level. matchmaking and interface with cloud on a secured channel.ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2. (SBBR). because backup Network). the application vendor that rent the resources from venture(s) and after secures the channel using IP Security and in-flight encryption virtualization.Linux Box Another technique to reduces the cost of the solution and is unable to includes optimization concept with cost reduction protect data from disaster. semantically similar service description. al. We made a focus on this (HBSRS). The application will These three phases are discovery. This solution eliminates consumer’s know the Cloud services are expensive and large number of dependency on the ISP and its associated backup cost. Efficient Routing Grounded on Taxonomy (ERGOT) Efficient Routing Grounded on Taxonomy [4] is a recovery process. it show how service imposed maximum outage logarithmic performance bounds. The application then interacts with the application The cooperating venture is paid for its infrastructure stack at the cloud service provider and does a onetime full utilization [17]. It is based on three core objectives: 1) It backup.

“Recovery Strategies for Service Composition in Dynamic Network.N Approach Advantage Disadvantage o 1 HSDRT[1]  Used for  Costly Movable clients  Increase like laptop. [5] Vijaykumar Javaraiah Brocade Advanced Networks and Telecommunication Systems (ANTS). possible. and S. pp. “Backup for Cloud and Disaster Recovery for Consumers and SMBs. All these techniques tried to cover different Network System Applications.” 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster." Communication Technology ICCT 11th IEEE International Conference. the optimization concept and redundancy. Junshuai Shi. due to the high model protection level is very low.Ueno. low  It is unable to implementation complexity. nevertheless it fails to  Cost depends attention due to manage the low cost for the implementation of the recovery on the rented concept and also unable to control the data duplication. in this remote data back-up server. However. Sungmin Park. 2009. it is unable to the Rented n. pp. we presented detail review of most recent backup with cost between logical and back-up and recovery techniques that have been developed in router reduction physical cloud computing domain. optimization concept with cost Among all the techniques reviewed PCS is comparatively reduction reliable. Issue 5. "A backup restoration algorithm of service composition in MANETs. rents it to the get Complex control the implementation complexities. In addition. however fails to concentrate on topic. For example. However there are some techniques in which cost increases gradually as data increases.Muzai Gakuendai. Rather. Cloud and Grid Computing. redundancy and recovery in includes short span of time. pp 256-259. All these performance approaches are able to provide best performances under all problem uncontrolled circumstances such as cost.ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2. “ERGOT: A Semantic-based System for Service Discovery in Distributed Infrastructures. the role of a techniques maintaining the cost of implementation. Paolo Missier and Carole Goble. 2011. Chiba.Suzuki. November 2012 Strategy[6] detected gradually V. N. Yingxiao Xu. Detail review of this paper shows resources(S  Works even configurations may that these techniques have its own advantages and BBR)[10] lead to some if router fails disadvantages which are summarized in the Table-1. [7] Xi Zhou. Inzai-shi.” International Joint Conference of trigger basis of failure detection. Proceedings of the 4th edition of the UPGRADE-CN workshop. smart phones etc. 2008.2010.” International Conference on Cloud and Service Computing. 588-591. “Parity Cloud Service: A Privacy-Protected Personal Hot back-up strategy that performs backup and recovery on Data Recovery Service. Therefore. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 6 Shared  It concerns  Inconsistencies In this paper. IEEE TrustCom-11/IEEE ICESS-11/FCST-11. Resources clients in form of  Resources must HSDRT has come out an efficient technique for the movable [17] cloud services kept under special clients such as laptop.” IEEE 5th International Conference. Although each one of the backup solution in cloud Linux Box model is having very simple concept of data computing is unable to achieve all the aforesaid issues of back-up and recovery with very low cost. Yinsheng Li and Weiwei Sun. Paolo Trunfio . security. Noriharu Miyaho. Similarly. Cold and [2] Chi-won Song. 2011. 253 . With entirely new REFERENCES concept of virtualization REN cloud also focuses on the low [1] Yoichiro Ueno. Table-1 Comparison between Various Techniques of Back-Up and Recovery S. Domenico Talia. Yang Yang. infrastructure ERGOT is totally based on the semantic analysis and unable utilization to focus on time and implementation complexity.” Fifth International Conference issues maintaining the cost of implementation as low as on Systems and Networks Communications. Jianwei An. 2011. Dong-wook Kim. However.Miyaho. SBBR remote data back –up server is very crucial and hot research focuses on the cost reduction. Sooyong Kang. Shuichi Suzuki. Smart redundancy Phone 2 Parity  Reliable  Implementation Cloud  Privacy  complexity is Service[2] high  Low cost 3 ERGOT[4]  perform  Time exact-match complexity retrieval  Implementation  Privacy complexity 4 Linux  Simple  Required higher Box[5]  Low cost for bandwidth implementation  Privacy  Complete server Backup at a time 5 Cold /Hot  Triggered  Cost increases Back-up only when failure as data increases [3] Y.Kazuo Ichihara. [4] Giuseppe Pirr´o. 45-48. “Performance cost infrastructure with the complex implementation and low Evaluation of a Disaster Recovery System and Practical security level. On the contrary. “Disaster Recovery Mechanism using Widely Distributed Networking and Secure Metadata Handling Technology”.2010. [6] Lili Sun. Ming Zeng. maintain its privacy for each resource and also it try 7 Rent Out  Virtualizatio  Implementation to minimize the cost of infrastructure. in the list of applicability of backup process in the companies.

. in Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. “Above the clouds: A Berkeley view of cloud computing”. Matsunaga.” SIGOPS Oper. India. University of California. United Arab Emirates. . Konwinski. Chen. Nagpur University. M.” IEEE Second International Conference on Future Networks. Buyya. Germany. November 2012 [8] M. emus: high availability via asynchronous virtual machine replication. 2010.” IEEE ICCE Conference." 6th International Conference on Internet Technology and Secure Transactions. Nagpur. N. Thomas Bauscherty. Fabrice Huet. [18] Y. Rough sets. D. 37. M.” in proceedings of the 2009 Eight International Conference on grid and Co-operative Computing ser. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing2011. and X. Ranchi. Zhang. pp. Paratus. 13.307-312.Demeester et al. pp. Hutchinson. Tech.40-56. Dominic A. McDougall and J. Her current research interests include the area of Data structures. A. I. Services Peer-to-Peer Discovery Service. pp. [12] P. 2008. Munich.E degree in Computer Technology in 2000 from RGCERT. Image Processing. “Above the clouds: A Berkeley view of cloud computing. 93-97. [13] T. No. A. X. She is also pursuing her M.Costanzo and R. Vol. in 2007. “Virtual Cloud: Rent Out the Rented Resources. C. G.11-14 . pattern Recognition.70-76. E Degree in Computer Science and Engineering from TulsiRamji Gaikwad Patil College of Engineering and Technology. p. 2011. [9] F. vol.” Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC 2009). D. Patterson. “Instantaneous Failover via Virtual Machine Replication. 2009. Warfield. D. India. and A. L. “Resilience in Multilayer Networks.44. [19] A.berkeley. Her current research interests include the area of Data structures.” http://www. Surat. Coughlin and S. [16] Sheheryar Malik. Databases. in 2000. Assuncao. Berkeley.GCC’09.Benefit of Using Cloud Computing to Extend the Capacity of Clusters. pp.2009. Rabkin.Du and H. December 2010. [17] B.ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2. the M. Degree in Computer Science Engineering from the Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of 43-51. Issue 5. Stoica. Lee. S. [20] R. Feeley. 1999. YCCE. Programming Languages (Dot net and PHP) and Cloud Computing. “Cloud Computing Research and Development Trend. vol. “Recovery Time Analysis for the Shared Backup Router Resources (SBRR) Architecture”. “Virtualization performance: perspectives and challenges ahead. 2009.Shahabi. 161–174. Linfoot.BKashani. Meyer.” IEEE Communications Magazine. Armbrust et al. Anderson.Tech. Technology. 2004. Lefebvre. AUTHORS PROFILE Kruti Sharma received her Diploma in Computer Science and Engineering in 2008 from RGPV. 2009 . She is currently a Assistant Professor in Computer Technology Department. December 2011.” ICOMP. India and received B. A. Degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Birla Institute of 254 . and now she is pursuing her Ph. Schupke. Cully. Database. “Sky Computing”.Yu. “Utilizing Memory Content Similarity for Improving the Performance of Replicated Virtual Machines”. Tsugawa. Fortes. C. India.Tech degree in Computer Science Engineering from YCCE. Huo. M. D. Nagpur.WSPDS. Nagpur. G. 2009. [14] K.Abu Dhabi. 8. IEEE ICC. Bhopal. Zoltan Vass and Yutaka Ishikawa. A. Rep. J. Kavita R Singh received the B. Zaharia. “Web [10] Eleni Palkopoulou¤y. IEEE Computer Society. pp. “A Novel Taxonomy for Consumer Metadata. Nagpur in 2011.eecs.Chen. Keahey. 2010. IEEE Journal of Internet Computing. “Evaluating the Cost. M. Syst Rev. [11] Balazs Gerofi. [15] M.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful

Master Your Semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master Your Semester with a Special Offer from Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.