Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Applicant
Vs
Opp.party
This Opp.party denies all the allegations made in the petition affidavit,
except those that are specifically hereunder to be true and puts the applicant
for the strict proof of the same.
3.
It is not true to suggest that the workmen are working 12 hours a day
including lunch and tea time and the Opp.party has not paid over time
wages. The spread over is even 12 hours, the working hours are only 8
excluding the rest intervals.
4.
jurisdiction to file this application and hence the Authority has to decide the
jurisdiction of the applicant to file this petition as a predeminary plaint.
5.
This Opp.party humbly submits that the joint inspection team consists
of labour, factories, E.S.I, and P.F. Officials have inspected the Mahi Agro
Private Products Limited, Gundlapalli Village on 28-04-2009 at 3 P.M.
Mahi Agro Private Products Limited situated at Gundlapalli is a factory
The applicant
and the Assistant Labour Officer-1, Ongole is not a notified Inspector under
Factories Act.
1948. Sec.14(2) of the Minimum Wages Act 1948 says nothing in this Act
shall prejudice the operation of the provisions of [sec.59 of the Factories
Act, 1948, in any case where those provisions are applicable. Sec.14(2) of
Minimum Wages Act 1948 made the provisions of sec.59 of the Factories
Act 1948 is applicable. As the applicant is not an Inspector under Factories
Act 1948, he has no jurisdiction to file this claim petition. The inspector of
Factories, Ongole only has the jurisdiction to file a claim petition for the
over time wages for the establishments which were registered under
Factories Act 1948. Hence I request the Authority under Payment of Wages
Act 1936 to decide the jurisdiction of the applicant to file this application as
a preliminary plaint.
6.
This Opp.party further humbly submits that in the claim petition the
applicant has covered 105 workers, out of them 38 workers are belonging to
the supervision and confidential position in the Factory.
As per the
provisions of Factories Act 1948, and Rules 1950 the provisions regarding
working hours, rest intervals, spread over, weekly holidays, and over time
etc., shall not applied to persons holding position of supervision or
management or who are employed in confidential position in a Factory.
7.
Factories Act says where a worker works in a factory for more than 9 hours
in any day or for more than 48 hours in any week, he shall, in respect of over
time work be entitled to various at the rate of twice his ordinary rate of
wages. Rule-84(b)(iv) of the A.P. Factories Rules 1950 says the total no.
of hours of over time shall not exceed 50 in any one quarter of the calendar
year.
Hence as per the Factories Act 1948 u/s 59 r/w rule 84(b)(iv) the
Inspector having jurisdiction to file a claim petition for over time wages can
only file not exceeding 50 hours for a quarter. This claim petition covered
two quarters of a year i.e., from 01-10-2008 to 31-12-2008 and 01-01-2009
to 31-03-2009 and claimed over time wages for 468 hours. As per the
provisions of the Factories Act & Rules the claim petition has to remit for
100 hours only.
8.
This Opp.party further humbly submits that in the above said facts and
OPP.PARTY
It is hereby declared that whatever sated above is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge, belief and information. Hence verified.
Dt:-
OPP.PARTY
P.W.CASE No.6/2009
FILED BY:-