Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
The impact of card cylinder speed, card production
rate and draw frame doubling on cotton yarn quality
parameters was investigated by using the BoxBehnken experimental design. It was found that yarn
tenacity, elongation and hairiness increase by
increasing the number of draw frame doubling up to a
certain level and then decrease by further increase in
doubling. Yarn unevenness increased by increasing
card production rate and total yarn imperfections
increased by decreasing card cylinder speed and
increasing card production rate.
72
http://www.jeffjournal.org
73
http://www.jeffjournal.org
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Factors/Input
x1
x2
x3
-1
-1
0
1
-1
0
-1
1
0
1
1
0
-1
0
-1
1
0
-1
-1
0
1
1
0
1
0
-1
-1
0
1
-1
0
-1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hairiness (S3)
1081.1
1324.7
1222.91
1224.3
331.4
733.9
485.2
815.4
1204.5
377.5
1491.6
466.1
1643
1579
1480
Um (%)
11.5
11.42
12.16
12.02
11.93
11.95
11.91
11.73
11.66
12.27
11.45
11.95
11.76
11.39
11.77
Responses/Output variables
IPI
Elongation (%)
426
4.26
277
4.42
565
4.42
475
4.28
491
3.67
382.5
3.63
536
3.69
368
3.78
332
3.96
612.5
3.62
332
4.42
538.5
3.68
451
4.4
340
4.29
391
4.35
Tenacity (RKM)
18.29
17.97
17.12
17.46
17.29
16.35
16.77
16.11
16.59
17.1
15.64
16.54
17.81
17.68
18.11
TABLE III. Regression coefficients for different response variables using coded values of the input variables.
Term
x1
x2
x3
x12
x22
x32
x1x2
x1x3
x2x3
Hairiness (S3)
Coeff.
P-Value
122.21
0.322
-226.39
0.097
76.38
0.523
-323.77
0.105
-30.32
0.860
-652.09
0.010*
-60.55
0.716
-18.08
0.913
-49.63
0.765
Coeff.
-0.0475
0.2962
-0.0962
0.0913
0.0437
0.1487
-0.0150
-0.0500
-0.0275
Um%
P-Value
0.402
0.002*
0.123
0.286
0.591
0.109
0.846
0.526
0.723
IPI
Coeff.
-64.438
103.000
103.000
16.188
25.563
34.188
14.750
-14.875
-18.500
P-Value
0.011*
0.001*
0.751
0.528
0.333
0.212
0.549
0.545
0.457
Elongation (%)
Coeff.
P-Value
0.00875
0.899
-0.13250
0.100
0.08625
0.246
-0.11458
0.289
0.11292
0.296
-0.53958
0.003*
-0.07500
0.456
0.03250
0.741
-0.10000
0.331
Tenacity (RKM)
Coeff.
P-Value
-0.1975
0.381
-0.0337
0.876
-0.2838
0.226
0.0029
0.993
-0.1596
0.620
-1.2396
0.009*
0.1650
0.595
0.0700
0.819
0.0975
0.751
No.
Yarn properties
Regression equation
R2 (%)
Hairiness
83.25
Um%
IPI
Elongation (%)
Tenacity (RKM)
Yarn Hairiness
Surface plots depicting the effect of card production
rate, card cylinder speed, and draw-frame doubling
on yarn hairiness are given in Figure 1(a, b, c). It is
clear from the Figure 1(b, c) that yarn hairiness
increases with the increase in draw frame doubling
up to a certain point and then decreases with any
89.49
92.41
89.40
80.24
http://www.jeffjournal.org
FIGURE 1. Effect of card cylinder speed, card production rate and draw frame doubling on yarn hairiness.
Yarn Unevenness
Figure 2(a, b, c) depicts the effect of card cylinder
speed, card production rate, and draw frame doubling
on yarn unevenness. It is clear from Figure 2(a, c)
that yarn unevenness increases with an increase in the
card production rate. As the card production rate is
increased from 80 to 120 kg/hr, there is a steady
increase in the yarn unevenness (Um%) from an
average value of 11.5 at 80 kg/hr production rate to
12.1 at 120 kg/hr production rate. It is evident from
the trend that the yarn unevenness is directly
proportional to the card production speed and the
spinner should increase the card production rate with
caution. The trend in the results can be explained as
follows: the higher production rate results in poor
carding, higher cylinder-loading and more leading
fiber-hooks in the carded sliver. Ultimately, roving
with higher leading fiber-hooks is forwarded to the
75
http://www.jeffjournal.org
FIGURE 2. Effect of card cylinder speed, card production rate and draw frame doubling on yarn unevenness.
FIGURE 3. Effect of card cylinder speed, card production rate and draw frame doubling on yarn imperfections (IPI).
76
http://www.jeffjournal.org
FIGURE 4. Effect of card cylinder speed, card production rate and draw frame doubling on yarn breaking elongation.
Yarn Tenacity
Surface plots in Figure 5(a, b, c) show the effect of
card cylinder speed, card production rate, and draw
frame doubling on the yarn tenacity. It can be seen
from Figure 5(b, c) that the yarn tenacity increases
with an increase in draw frame doubling up to a
certain level and then decreases with a further
increase in doubling. Yarn tenacity is higher when
the draw frame doubling is 6, while it is lower when
the doubling is 5 or 7. Sliver doubling improves fiber
straightening and parallelization by the increase in
draft up to a certain level and beyond that level, fiber
parallelization decreases with an increase in
FIGURE 5. Effect of card cylinder speed, card production rate and draw frame doubling on yarn tenacity.
CONCLUSIONS
Increase in card cylinder speed significantly
decreases the yarn IPI, without significantly affecting
any other yarn parameter. An increase in card
production rate results in a significant increase in
yarn IPI as well as yarn unevenness. The number of
Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
Volume 8, Issue 2 2013
http://www.jeffjournal.org
AUTHORS ADDRESSES
Abdul Jabbar
Tanveer Hussain, PhD
Abdul Moqeet
National Textile University
Sheikhupura Road
Faisalabad, Punjab 37610
PAKISTAN
REFERENCES
[1] Ishtiaque, S. M.; Chaudhuri, S.; and Das, A.;
Influence of fiber openness on processibility
of cotton and yarn quality. Part I: Effect of
blow room parameters Indian Journal of
Fibre & Textile Research, 28, 2003, 399-404.
[2] Ishtiaque, S. M.; Chaudhuri, S.; and Das, A.;
Influence of fiber openness on processibility
of cotton and yarn quality. Part II: Effect of
carding parameters Indian Journal of Fibre &
Textile Research, 28, 2003, 405-410.
[3] Ishtiaque, S. M.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; and
Kumar, A.; Influence of drawframe speed and
its preparatory on ring yarn propertiesJournal
of the Textile Institute, 99, 2008, 533-538.
[4] Garde, A. R.; Wakankar, V. A.; and Bhaduri, S.
N.; Fiber configuration in sliver and roving
and its effect on yarn quality Textile Research
Journal, 31, 1961, 1026-1036.
[5] Ishtiaque, S. M.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; and
Kumar, A.; Impact of carding parameters and
drawframe speed on fiber axial distribution in
ring spun yarn Indian Journal of Fibre &
Textile Research, 34, 2009, 231-238.
[6] Kumar, A.; Ishtiaque, S. M.; and Salhotra, K. R.;
Analysis of spinning process using the
Taguchi method. Part IV: Effect of spinning
process variables on tensile properties of ring,
rotor and air-jet yarns Journal of the Textile
Institute, 97, 2006, 385-390.
[7] Kumar, A.; Ishtiaque, S. M.; and Salhotra, K. R.;
Analysis of spinning process using the
Taguchi method. Part V: Effect of spinning
process variables on physical properties of
ring, rotor and air-jet yarns Journal of the
Textile Institute, 97, 2006, 463-473.
[8] Lee, J. R.; and Ruppenicker, G. F.; Effect of
precessing variables on the preperties of cotton
knitting yarns Textile Research Journal, 48,
1978, 27-31.
[9] Lawal, A. S.; Nkeonye, P. O,; and Anandjiwala,
R. D.; Influence of spindle speed on yarn
quality of Flax/Cotton blend The Open
Textile Journal, 4, 2011, 7-12
Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
Volume 8, Issue 2 2013
78
http://www.jeffjournal.org