Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ece
spending the rest of their natural life based upon, as realist legal theorists say, what the judge had for
breakfast?
If the court in V. Sriharan does not place fetters on the executive discretion in carrying out sentences, it
will be a vote of confidence for our prisons, recognising that indeed they are correctional institutions.
Those who enter its doors as life convicts can hope, albeit after a long incarceration, to walk out again,
suitably and sufficiently equipped, to be reintegrated into society.
While it is naive to assume that underpaid and overworked staff in overcrowded prisons will be able to
bring about holistic reformation in the vilest and most despicable of prisoners, this would be the profile
of a few prisoners only. To assume this for all prisoners is to let the exception dictate the rule. Most
prisoners who come out at the wrong end of the judicial system after going through the multi-tiered
appeals process seem to be the poorest and most marginalised in society. Correctional institutions
present them with avenues of reforming, by earning an honest wage in jail factories or getting an
education, all of which were not available to them outside jail.
However, if the court holds that for some life convicts there is no prospect of release, irrespective of any
reformation they may have undergone, serious questions would be raised about our correctional
institutions. The court would be pre-judging and completely ruling out the prospect of any reform on
the date of the sentencing. It is worth pondering whether prisoners who are sent to prison for their
whole life are incarcerated merely to compensate for the failure of the prison system to help prisoners
meaningfully reintegrate into society.
International disapproval
Whole life sentences have been disapproved of internationally. In Germany, it has been held to attack
the essence of human dignity. The European Court for Human Rights has declared such sentences as
illegal if they do not provide the prisoner a right of consideration for early release. Namibia has ruled
that such sentences would amount to cruelty at state expense and reduce the prisoner to a thing rather
than a person. A prisoner who has been in jail for over 20 years awaiting execution of his death
sentence told me that if judges who hand out these long sentences could spend even a month in prison
conditions, he would be surprised.
While questions of the sufficiency of punishment are usually not amenable to easy resolution, the
unenviable task of sentencing falls upon the shoulders of the judiciary, as it has in the 7/11 blasts case.
In performing this task, however, it would do well to remember the words of Oscar Wilde: Every saint
has a past and every sinner a future.
(Nishant Gokhale is an Associate with the Centre on the Death Penalty at the National Law
University, Delhi.)