Gmail - Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c92a7b4817&vi...

Stephen Bradbury <bradbury.complaints@gmail.com>

Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

Stephen Bradbury <bradbury.complaints@gmail.com>
Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:16 AM
To: lynne.overend@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: !NorthCasework <_NorthCasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>, !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>,
kathryn.stone@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, Neil Wilby <neil.wilby@btinternet.com>
Bcc: Stephen Bradbury <porscheblue@hotmail.co.uk>
Dear Lynne
You claim that it may take up to eleven weeks to allocate my appeal to a caseworker. This document
provided to me by my friend, Mr Neil Wilby, strongly suggests you are deliberately lying to me.
https://www.ipcc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Commission%20documents/September2015/
Item%207%20-%20Chief%20Executives%20Overview%20Report%20and%20Annex%201.pdf
It states clearly that non-recording appeals are dealt with by the IPCC in 82% of cases within FIVE weeks,
not ELEVEN weeks. Mine should ALL be treated as a priority.
Mr Wilby also tells me you have a triage system for dealing with urgent cases. Mine fall into that bracket
as WYP are deliberately targeting me by not recording legitimate well evidenced complaints.
Now it is confirmed that the IPCC are targeting me as well. I point I have put to Mr Knight and Mr Emery
on a number of occasions over the past two years.
Please ask Kathryn Stone to respond to all the points I have raised above.

Stephen Bradbury

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, !NorthCasework <NorthCasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Our reference 2015/056889

Dear Mr Bradbury

I acknowledge receipt of your email dated 10 November 2015.

I can conrm that from the date we received your appeal it may take up to approx 11 weeks for it to
be allocated. However, it is possible that your appeal may be allocated more quickly than this.

1 of 7

17/11/2015 09:50

Gmail - Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c92a7b4817&vi...

I also conrm that I have forwarded your email to our FOI team to respond to you regarding the
other maNers you have raised in your email.

With kind regards

Lynne Overend
Casework Administrator
Independent Police Complaints Commission
PO Box 473
Sale
M33 0BW

Tel: 0161 246 8502

northcasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
www.ipcc.gov.uk
IPCC Statutory Guidance on the handling of police complaints

From: Stephen Bradbury [mailto:bradbury.complaints@gmail.com]

Sent: 10 November 2015 14:59
To: Melanie O'Connor
Cc: ab36; !enquiries; !NorthCasework
Subject: Re: Acknowledgement of supporting documentation - 2015/056889

Dear Melanie
What is the present average waiting time for non-recording appeals to be decided by the IPCC?
Simply saying I will hear 'in due course' is not acceptable.
This is a complaint that WYP should have recorded within 10 working days of 2nd August, 2015. It is

2 of 7

17/11/2015 09:50

Gmail - Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c92a7b4817&vi...

now 10th November. The matter should be treated as a priority by the IPCC. WYP are making fools of
us both.
I would like to know how many non-recording appeals the IPCC receive each week, how many
caseworkers work on them, and how long it normally takes between receiving them and finalising them.
Treat this as a FoI request if you wish.

Please also place this email and your reply on the case file as well.

Stephen Bradbury

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Melanie O'Connor <melanie.o'connor@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Bradbury

Thank you for your email below received on the 10 November 2015. I can conrm that this has
been placed on your case le, along with the aNachment and will be reviewed by the allocated
person.

You will hear from us in due course.

Yours sincerely

Melanie O'Connor
Casework Administrator
Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)
Tel: 0161 246 8502
northcasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

From: Stephen Bradbury [mailto:bradbury.complaints@gmail.com]

Sent: 10 November 2015 11:42
To: Melanie O'Connor
Cc: ab36; !enquiries; !NorthCasework

3 of 7

17/11/2015 09:50

Gmail - Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c92a7b4817&vi...

Subject: Re: Appeal acknowledgement - 2015/056889

Dear Melanie
Please find attached the document that contains a clear request to record a complaint against DCI Ian
Croft. I think that I forgot to attach it to my previous email. You will find the reference to the complaint at
paragraph 7.
It is my well evidenced belief that Croft is part of an extensive ring of liars in West Yorkshire
Professional Standards that starts at the top with Clive Wain, includes Osman Khan and ends up with
Lesley Townsley, Tracey Gough and Sarah Morris at the bottom of the foodchain being told they can tell
lies with impunity to complainants and the IPCC and they will be protected from any sanctions by senior
officers..
You, and everyone else at the IPCC, should be aware that at a meeting I had with ACC Andy Battle and
Wain at police HQ in October 2014 Khan was thrown out of the meeting, at my insistence, because of
the lies he had told me previously. No objections were raised, by either Battle or Wain, to Khan being
dismissed from the meeting on that basis.
I have copied Andy Battle into this email and I am sure he will confirm what I say is correct.
On a more general note, if the IPCC management were doing the job they are paid for, as police
watchdog, then millions of pounds would be saved by rooting out these bent officers.

Stephen Bradbury

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:47 PM, !NorthCasework <NorthCasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Bradbury

Thank you for your appeal received in this office on 2 November 2015. You asked us to review the
decision not to record your complaint by West Yorkshire Police.

This email confirms that we have received your appeal. However, we have not yet looked at the issues
you have raised.

Our role is to review whether or not West Yorkshire Police are the correct body to consider your
complaint and whether or not they should have recorded the matter as a complaint under the Police
Reform Act 2002. If you have not been given a recording decision we can direct them to provide you
with this. Once we have completed the review, the decision we make about your appeal is final. Any
direction made about recording your complaint is not an indication from us about the merit of your
complaint.

As part of the appeals process we will contact West Yorkshire Police, to get all the information they hold

4 of 7

17/11/2015 09:50

Gmail - Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c92a7b4817&vi...

about your complaint. We will use this when looking at your appeal along with the information you have
submitted as your appeal. You will not be able to provide additional information for us to consider after
a decision is made on your appeal. Our decision will be final.

Please see the document enclosed, visit our website or contact us for more information about the
appeals process and what will happen next.

Yours sincerely

Melanie O'Connor
Casework Administrator
Independent Police Complaints Commission
PO Box 473
Sale
M33 0BW

Tel: 0161 246 8502

northcasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
www.ipcc.gov.uk
IPCC Statutory Guidance on the handling of police complaints
We now regularly publish practical advice and guidance for handling complaints in our magazine
FOCUS

From: Stephen Bradbury [mailto:bradbury.complaints@gmail.com]

Sent: 02 November 2015 10:44
To: !enquiries; !NorthCasework
Cc: ccoffice
Subject: NR appeal from Stephen Bradbury SEE EMAIL ABOVE -Non-recording appeal: Complaint
against DCI Ian Croft

Dear Sir/Madam
In paragraph 7 of the attached appeal I made to West Yorks Police it was specifically requested that a
complaint be recorded against DCI Ian Croft.

5 of 7

17/11/2015 09:50

Gmail - Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c92a7b4817&vi...

WYP have not notified me that the complaint has been recorded.
This matter is a very serious one as DCI Croft has lied to me about PSD lying to the IPCC. I know that
might sound complicated but WYP are a police force that does lie a lot, as I believe you are well aware.
Mr Knight kindly provided the proof of DCI Croft's lying in his letter to me dated 15th May, 2015.

Please regard this email as my non-recording appeal.

Stephen Bradbury
This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call
your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.)
This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call
your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.)
This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call
your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.)
This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

6 of 7

17/11/2015 09:50

Gmail - Re: Re appeal - 2015/056889

7 of 7

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c92a7b4817&vi...

17/11/2015 09:50