Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
c
! "
!
#
$
2
2
2
Sinha (2007) defined strategic human resource management as the linking of human
resources with strategic goals and objectives in order to improve business performance and
develop organizational culture that foster innovation, flexibility and competitive advantage.
One related journal on strategic HRM was written by Azhdar, Farhad, and Cusworth. This
journal explains the relationship between strategic management and employee relation in the
electronic manufacturing industry and therefore strategic HRM focuses on the overall
direction of the firm in pursuit of its stated goals and objectives. Personally, I couldn¶t agree
no more with the result from the study shows significant level of integration between HR and
business strategy and stronger when top management viewed employees as a strategic
resource.
The 3 researchers start the study by clarifying the difference between HRM and strategic
HRM. Out of many literature surveys they conducted, they conclude that the traditional HRM
did not place the emphasis on µpeople¶ and therefore paid more attention to µtask¶ at the
expense of people and their development, while strategic HRM emphasis total contribution
on the firm; innovative and creative behaviour; overall effectiveness and cross-functional
integration. In my point of view, strategic HRM focuses on human resource programs with
long-term objectives. Instead of focusing on internal human resource issues, the focus is on
addressing and solving problems that affect people management programs in the long run and
often globally.
%
c
c
! "
!
#
$
Thus, the primary actions of a strategic human resource manager are to identify key HR areas
where strategies can be implemented in the long run to improve the overall employee
The first hypothesis is to identify nature of relationship between the core competencies of the
firm (quality of product/service1, and HR capabilities2) and the firm¶s performance. The
result shows that both give positive relationship between product/service quality & HR
capabilities and firm¶s performance. No doubt that nowadays, for a firm to better perform in
this competitive market, they can¶t just focus on producing a good quality offering, but also
to be able in managing its own people. Why? The main reason is because people are assets
The second hypothesis is to identify the relationship between top managers¶ attitude on HR
effectiveness and the level of linkage between HR and business strategy. Result is that, the
level of integration between HR and business strategy was significant and stronger when top
management viewed employees as strategic resource. This shows that the top level
management now has realised on new belief that the principal source of competitive
Based on the study, it has proved that with good conduct of HRM, this will lead to better
performance of a firm in term of quality, profitability, and also customer satisfaction (Noe,
Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2004). Although the study only covers the British electronic
manufacturing industry, however, the growing trend of HR department has given big impact
for worldwide.
1
Product/service quality described the extent to which the efficiency of the production process provided a
competitive advantage.
2
HR capabilities described the extent to which firms viewed skilled human resource as their source of
competitive advantage.
&
c
c
! "
!
#
$
No doubt, strategic thinking in HR is a choice that firms make. Though, there is a wide gap
between theorization and implementation. This gap can only be reduced with practical testing
&&