Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MINGWUWANG
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Department of Power Machinery Engineering
(i)
determinant
of
natural frequency,
,----~-1
El
number of dynamic
optimization objective function.
coefficient matrix of
B
units
for
optimization
equation set.
superscript:
r ,i
number. respectively.
1. INTRODUCTION
mass, stiffness and damping of the ith
DVA.
g(t)
g opt (t)
f(t)
of algebraic
value
f +g .
primary system.
f,
R(k .i)
l'
R;
~i
m k. c.
Mffi 1 + jCm + K
NOMENCLATURE
M, K, C
optimization result of g ( t) ,
external exciting force vector,
251
m, l-< n.
The effect of DV A attached
=j
(t) + g(t)
(1)
where,
M=
Ml
M2
0
0
0
0
0 Mn
(KI +Kz)
-Kz
-~
~ +K3
-K3
-Kn-1
K==
K,_t + K. -K.
-K.
(C1+C2)
-c;
-c;
C2+~
-C3
-Cn-1
0
K.
0
0
C==
0
0
cn-1 +c.
-c.
-c.
c.
(2-4)
x(t) = [x 1(t)
j(t)
X2 (t)
X,
(t)
252
(-Mco 2 + jCco + K) X= j + g
(6)
gopt
let
e; = 2.,(Jk +gk)Aki
(13)
2::0
k=l
'(J)
>0
m(IRI)
(14)
E;
Mco 2 + jCco + K,
of
(15a)
(9)
IRI
E; = - 2., M;co 2 ( - ;) 2
2 i=l
IRI
\R;j
... i=l
(15c)
Ak =A;+ j A~
e,
(15b)
(8)
(7)
E;
gk=gk+jgk
(10)
must be satisfied,
a e;j = 0,
;a gn-o
(11)
ae;j =0.
ja gn-o
i
8 = 0. 1. . m- 2. m- 1
(l7a-b)
k=l
E; =
lcol
2:tM;(\Rf)
~(fk + gk)Aki
g; and
(12)
vector, i.e, g i, and let the results equal zero, one obtain.
It is obvious that
the
the
253
II
k=l
g opt
=0
k=l
(18-19)
multiply equation (19) with j
one
can
obtain
the
closed
form
IBI i:- 0
solution
for
equation(18) to it yields,
(23)
(20)
k=l
g opt '
A;;L[Ak;(fk + gk)]
=0
(21)
k=l
A;
is
gopt(t).
k=l
(24a-b)
For steady state vibration,
- (J) m;Y;
(25a)
(25b)
so, requirement for the ith OVA can be expressed as:
(2). For the case of l<m, there are many indefinite roots
for (21), when the number of OVA is large enough, its
dynamic parameters can oscillate within a range keeping
E;
m;ro (k;
+ }c;ro)
giopt
--=-----=---~----
m;(J)
(k;
+ }c;ro)
(26)
X;
'
=~i
m.
'
(27a-b)
'
(27c-d)
B gopt = U
(28)
(22)
254
n.
1
(1- f
2
Ai
+ 4~ ;) = Z;
(29a)
clop:=
Q.
"-
A1
'
f.
zi
where.
(\ = (1 -
~"-;
f Ai2 ) 2 + 4jAiXi
2 2
1.170 (NS I m)
m ~P = 65.79 (rad Is).
1
m 2 = 0.05kg,
(29b)
0.178,
!opt=
'
~ 0 _,., 1 2) h
m 1= 0.03kg,
(29c)
2opt=
0.142'
lopr=
0.935 (NS I m)
Zopz=
216.45 (N I m).
m 3= O.lkg,
3opt=
QJ63,
Jopr=
0.599 (NS I m)
at first under
4. CONCLUSIONS.
Based on considerable endeavors of many scholars.
authors presented an advanced optimization theory for
parameters of DV A attached to a linear damped MDOF
system. This theory. as it employs the optimum force
column vector consisting of component force exerted by
m DV As on the dynamic units to which the former are
attached, is very efficient to get the optimal parameters of
DV As because the optimization objective function
involves only one independent variable which can mirror
the vibration absorption effectiveness of the specific
DVA. So the optimization process is simplified most
considerably.
M1
= 0.25kg.
M 2 = O.Skg.
M 3 = l.Okg,
C1 = 0.001Ns I m,
C1 =0.01Nslm.C1 =0.1Nslm,
K1 = K2 = K3
ffi 3
= 19.8 (rad I s)
ffi 2
255
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
2)
3)
c 1 '--
5)
6)
7)
8)
L~.2.
damped dynamic absorber on a multi-degree-offreedom system, Noise and vibration control, 1996.
l 0) W. Lu AND H. WANG, The numerical method for
parameter optimization of dynamic vibration absorber
attached to a damped vibrating system, Journal of
vibration and shock, 1996
11) W. Lu AND Q. Yu, applying a combined substructuretransfer matrix method to the optimization of a
256
g ..
1?=:l
e
=:l
'0
.. . - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
t.1l
u
,.
:z:
uan
t
t.1l
LlJ
"'
"
frequency
(Hz)
257