Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 05 PB 2579
(CR Nos. 253975
and 270735)
AND DECISION
of Police
Mariam
sometimes
referred
following
rules:
Hamad,
to as "Respondent"),
against
(hereinafter
for violating
the
Rule 1:
Violation
Rule 2:
Rule 6:
Rule 10:
Inattention
Rule 13:
Failure to adequately
Department property.
Rule 14:
Making
Rule 26:
Failure
address
these charges
against
a false report,
secure
written
or oral.
Police Officer
13995,
to be had before
Thomas
Police
whether
to duty.
June
filed
Mariam
E. Johnson,
with a current
caused
Hamad,
Hearing
on April
a hearing
on
Star No.
Officer
3, April
of the
4, May 15,
the hearing,
the certified
the video-recording
Hearing
Police
Officer,
hearing
employed
of the hearing
of the hearing.
it rendered
Thomas
as a police
as a result of its
that:
officer
with the
a decision.
The Respondent
and
E. Johnson,
to and conferred
of the charges,
1.
transcription
Board before
The Police
the members
by the Department
herein
of Police of the
City of Chicago.
2.
The charges
were
together
April
The hearing
Officer
3, April
4.
was conducted
was
before
Thomas
E. Johnson,
on
of her choice
5.
charges,
Throughout
by counsel
proceed
of the charges
stating
on the charges.
3.
Hearing
and a Notice,
filed in writing
the Respondent
was represented
her counsel
to
in her absence) .
The Respondent,
13995, charged
Rule 1:
herein,
Violation
Police Officer
is not guilty
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
Star No.
to wit:
charged
Rule
1:
herein,
Police Officer
Mariam
Hamad,
is guilty of violating,
Violation
Star No.
to wit:
charged
Rule 2:
herein,
Police Officer
is guilty
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
Star No.
to wit:
charged
Rule 2:
herein,
Police Officer
is not guilty
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
Star No.
to wit:
charged
Rule 6:
herein,
Police Officer
is guilty
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
Star No.
to wit:
whether
charged
Rule 6:
herein,
Hamad,
of violating,
Star No.
to wit:
whether
The Respondent
charged
Rule 10:
herein,
Police Officer
is not guilty
Inattention
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
Star No.
to wit:
to duty.
The Respondent
charged
Rule 13:
herein,
Police Officer
is not guilty
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
Star No.
to wit:
The Respondent
charged
Rule 14:
herein,
Making
Police Officer
is not guilty
a false report,
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
written
Star No.
to wit:
or oral.
The Respondent
charged
Rule 14:
herein,
Making
Police Officer
is guilty
Mariam
Hamad,
of violating,
a false report,
written
the whereabouts
Chicago Police
Star No.
to wit:
or oral.
The Respondent
charged
Rule 26:
Police Officer
Mariam
Hamad,
herein,
is not guilty
of violating,
Failure
address
Star No.
to wit:
with a current
of violating
of the findings
Rules
is
of violating
Rules
6 (count II), 10, 13, 14 (count I), and 26, cause exists
the suspension
of the Respondent
as a police
for
officer
with
the Department
of Police,
for a period
from October
Hearing
Officer
6, 2005 to and
of
DEC
I S ION
Executive Director
Police Board
THIS
DIS
SEN
RECEIVED
A COpy OF
THE FOREGOING
THER ______
SUPERINTENDENT
COMMUNICATION
DAY OF
OF POLICE
from
2006.