Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1.INTRODUCTION
rading includes two basic processes. The first one is sorting the product
for removing undesirable and rotten material; such a process runs in
most cases manually and by dint of trained workers. The second process
is sorting out the product into categories in term of distinctive features suchlike
shape, size, weight or maturity degree; such a process runs either manually or
mechanically yet, the whole process of grading runs
*Prof. of Agric. Eng.,Agric. Mech. Dept., Faculty of Agric.,Kafr El-Sheikh, Tanta Univ.
**Assoc. Prof. of Agric. Eng.,Agric. Mech. Dept., Faculty of Agric.,Kafr El-Sheikh,
Tanta University
***First under Secretary and Head of Agric. Mech. Sector, Ministry of Agriculture.
****Agric. Eng., in Rice Mechanization Center (R.M.C)
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
192
193
M x 60
TG
......................................................................................................1
Where:
C = Grading productivity of the machine, Mg / h;
M = Mass of classified fruit, Mg and
TG = Grading time, min.
Peleg (1985) and Amin (1994) cited that the efficiency of grading for
an outlet can calculated according to the following equation:
M1
100 ..................................................................................................2
M
Where:
M1 = Mass of the fruits falling within the size category of an outlet, kg
and
M =Total mass of pre-classified fruits for the outlet, while
the total grading efficiency is the summation for all
outlet, kg.
The main objective of the present study was to construct and fabricate an
automatic grading prototype for grading some vegetables and fruits on weight
base. The electronic circuits have been designed and utilized to operate the
grading prototype automatically. The physical and mechanical properties of the
Cara potato tubers and Navel orange fruits had been investigated to determine
the main operational and designing parameters affecting the performance of the
proposed grading prototype.
194
195
3
2
Gram
Weight ad j.
Auto.
OFF
Z ERO
DOWN
UP
OFF
Maximum weight, Category(1)
CATEGORY(3)
CATEGORY(4)
ON
A
D
J
U
S
T
ADJUST
OVER LOAD
Motor start
Auto.
180
Manual
Screen reset
BALANCE ADJUST
POWER
OFF
STANDBY
ON
OPERATING
START
85
11
No.
Part name
1
2
Distribution table
distribution disc frame
3
4
Weight unit
Orientor
Feed chain
7
8
9
10
11
12
Synchronous unit
Cub
Feed hopper
Control box
Main frame
Feed unit frame
Distribution unit frame
12
10
27
88
75
250
60
Dim. in cm.
196
a- Synchronous unit:
The feeder of the distribution unit called synchronous unit, it has been
consisted of two gates which were formed semi-cylinder at closing it as shown
in Fig.1. The synchronous unit received the weighted fruit and opened for
falling the fruit into the gates of distribution unit. The gates of synchronous unit
have been opened and closed by means of solenoid, which was controlled by
using an electronic circuit.
b- The distribution disk:
The distribution disk has been consisted of two circular rings, which
were constructed from metal sheet. The diameter of the outer ring was 70 cm
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
197
but, the diameter of the inner ring was 20 cm. The distance between the outer
and inner rings was divided into 10 equal sections each of them equipped with a
vertical moving gate on the horizontal axial. It is fixed below each gate a spring
for its attracting into an electromagnet.
A lead weight has been jointed with the inner back edge of each gate for
adjusting the balance around the horizontal axial of the gate. The gates have
been closed during the operation by electromagnets which take their orders
from the gates control circuit.
The distribution disk was carried on a hollow roller which was attached
to the distribution frame by means of two ball bearings. The distribution disk
has been driven by means of a chain through out the power transmission unit
consequently, the distribution disk is rotated. It has been fixed on the inner ring
the electronic circuits required for closing and opening the gates which take
their orders by wires connected with slippers which were fixed on the hollow
roller.
c- The distribution table:
The distribution table is a circular disk, which was fixed below the fruits
distribution disk. Number of baskets were put on the distribution table to
receive the graded fruits.
5- Transmission system:
The transmission system has been consisted of two electrical motors
were used for driving each of feeding and distribution units in addition to
weight and grading unit. A main electrical motor, which has gear box (Model:
M425-201), 100 volt AC, 25 W, 1400 -1700 r.p.m and variable speed, has been
used for operating the feeding unit by means of a drive shaft. The motion is
transmitted from the drive shaft to the distribution unit by means of chain, two
gears and gear box with reduction ratio 10:1. An another electrical motor, 12
volt DC, 50 W, 40 r.p.m., variable speed was used for driving the belt of weight
and grading unit. There were a synchronization between both of the feeding and
distribution units by means of different gears in the diameter and number of
teeth.
6- Control system:
The control system has been comprise number of electronic circuits for
controlling in the feeding rates by means of the control in the feeding chain
speed and weight and grading unit belt speed. The control system also weight
the fruits singly by means of processor which has been controlled in the position
of the fruit outlet according to its category which has been determined by means
of a programming circuit. The control system consists of the following main
electronic circuits:
a- Power supply circuits;
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
c- Weight circuit;
e- Screen circuit and
d- Programming circuit;
f- Controlled gates circuit.
Sensor;
Amplifier and zero adjusting circuit;
Volt to frequency convertor circuit;
Timing circuit;
a-Starting weight position circuit;
b-Timer circuit;
5. Frequency pass controlling circuit and
6. Frequency to volt convertor circuit.
199
1- Sensor:
A piezoelectric sensor, Germany made Type DW1, has been comprised
electronic circuit which convert the pressure on the sensor disk to mA (milli
Ampere).
2- Amplifier and zero adjusting circuit:
The main function of this circuit was to amplify the sensor signal using a
variable resistor. The weight and grading unit presses on the sensor during the
grading operation consequently, a volt is generated which is suitable with the
weight and grading unit. During motion the fruit with the weight and grading
unit belt, a volt is generated from the sensor as a result to the fruit pressure on
the sensor.
3- Volt to frequency convertor circuit:
The main function of this circuit was to convert the output voltage from
the sensor, which was amplified, to frequency as linear regression (one volt
equal 1000 Hz).
4- Timing circuit:
The timing circuit, which has been used in this designing, consisted of
two main parts. The first part included starting weight position circuit. But, the
second one was timer circuit.
a- Starting weight position circuit:
The main function of this circuit was to determine the position of the
weight starting on the weight and grading unit belt by using transmitter and
receiver LEDs. During the motion of the fruit on the weight and grading unit
belt, it passes between the receiving and transmitting LEDs consequently, it
prevents conveying the ray from the transmitter to the receiver thus, it gives
signal which was used for operating the timer circuit.
b-Timer circuit:
The main function of the timer circuit was to determine the time of
sample weight with a high accuracy where, the mistake ratio was not exceed
about one per million. At passing the fruit between the transmitter and receiver
LEDs, a pulse has been generated from the starting weight position circuit for
operating the timer circuit to generate and determine the time of the sample
weight, its value 100 ms.
5- Frequency pass controlling circuit:
The main function of this circuit was to control in passing the generated
frequency as a result to weight the fruit during the operation interval of the
timing circuit.
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
200
201
current about the coils by relay and the magnetic field avoid thus, the gate is
opened and the fruit falls in the suitable position.
METHODS:
Mass of fruit :
One hundred sample for each Navel orange and Cara potato were
randomly selected to determine the average mass of each fruit by using an
electronic balance with an accuracy of 0.01 g.
Coefficient of friction:
Coefficient of friction for the Cara potato and Navel orange have been
measured by using two friction surfaces which were smooth rubber and
galvanized steel. According to (Abd El-Mageed and Abd Alla, 1994) the fruits
or tubers have been placed over the friction surface and the tension force on the
fruit surface was gradually increased and stopped when the fruit begin to move.
Coefficient of friction has calculated using following equation:
P
tan ................................................................................................3
M
Where:
= Coefficient of friction, dimensionless;
P = Force required to start fruit movement on the horizontal plan, N;
M = Mass of fruit, N and
= Angle of friction, deg.
Rolling angle:
The rolling angle has measured by using an inclined plan with two types
of surface galvanized steel and smooth rubber. The orange fruit or potato tubers
have been placed on the horizontal surface of the inclined plat one by one and
then by gradually increasing the angle of inclination, until the fruit begin to roll,
and the recorded angle is considered as the rolling angle of the fruit or tuber.
Impact height:
202
M 60
TG
................................................................................................... 4
Where:
C = Productivity of the machine, Mg / h;
M = Mass of classified fruit, Mg and
TG = Grading time, min.
Grading efficiency:
The grading efficiency of each outlet has been calculated according to
the following equation:
M 1 100 ............................................................................................ 5
i
M
Where:
i = Grading efficiency of fruit, %;
MI = Mass of the classified fruits for each outlet, Mg and
M = Total mass of the fruits for each outlet in the machine, Mg.
The total efficiency of the grading machine has been calculated using the
following equation:
M1 M 2 M 3
x 100 ........................................................................... 6
M
Where:
= Total grading efficiency of the machine, % ;
M1 + M2 + M3 = Masses of the proposed
classified fruits for first,
second and third outlets,
Mg. and
M = Total mass of the fruits for each outlet in the machine, Mg.
Power unit requirements for the machine operation:
The consumed power ( kW ) has been estimated by using the multimeter, 700 volt (AC), 10 ampere- (Japan made) to measure the line current
strength and the electric potential. The electric power required for operating the
grading machine has been computed according to (Abd-Alla et al. 2000) by
using the following equation:
I E cos
........................................................................................... 7
P eL
1000
where:
PeL = The electric power required by the graing machine, kW;
I
= Electric current, Ampere;
E = Electric potential, Volt and
Cos = power factor, equal 0.64.
203
The power unit required operating grading achine has been calculated by
using the following equation:
Power unit = power, kW / poducivity, Mg.
Cost of grading operation:
The total cost of grading machine includes charges for ownership and
operation. Ownership costs are seemingly independent of use and are often
called fixed costs or overhead costs. Fixed costs include depreciation, interest
on investment, taxes, housing and insurance. Costs for operation vary directly
with the amount of use and are often called variable costs, or operating costs.
Variable costs include repair and maintenance, electricity and labour. Grading
cost LE/ h or LE/ Mg for the proposed grading machine was estimated
according to (El -Khawaga, 1999) as follows:
A- Fixed costs (FC ):
1- Depreciation (D):
D P - S .......................................................................................................9
L
Where:
D = Depreciation cost, LE;
P = Machine purchase price, LE;
S = Salvage value at the end of machine life (0.1 P), LE and
L = Machine life, year.
2- Interest (I):
I P - S i ................................................................................................10
2
Where:
I = Interest on investment. LE / year and
i = Interest rate, decimal.
3- Taxes, housing and insurance cost:
The taxes, housing and insurance costs had been assumed to be 2 % of
the purchase price of the machine (P).
Then:
Fixed costs ( LE / year ) = D + I + 0.02 P
Fixed costs ( LE / h ) = (D + I + 0.02 P) / yearly operating hours.
B- Variable costs (VC ):
1- Repair and maintenance costs (RM):
The repair and maintenance costs (RM) = 100 % depreciation cost / total
operating hours per year, LE/ h.
2- Energy (Electricity) cost (E):
E = Energy consumption (kW.h) x power price (0.25 LE/ kW), LE/.h.
3- Labour cost (La):
La = 1.5 (LE/h) x 2 labours
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
204
= 3 LE/h.
Then:
Variable costs (VC ) LE/h = RM + E + La
C- Total costs (TC ):
Total costs (LE/h) = Fixed costs (LE/h) + Variable costs (LE/h).
D- Important assumptions:
The following assumptions indicated in Table 1 were used for estimating
the cost of the proposed grading machine:
Table 1: Assumption for cost of the machine
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Item
Machine price ( P ), LE
Salvage value ( S ), LE
Housing and insurance ( Hi ), LE
Interest rate ( i ), LE
Energy price ( e ).
Machine life ( L ), year.
Yearly operation ( h ), hours.
Value
5000
10 % of ( P )
2 % of ( P )
12 %
0.25 LE/ kWh
8
2000
The physical properties of the Cara potato tubers and Navel orange fruits
have been measured as one of the important factors affecting on the designing
and fabricating the weight grading prototype and also affecting the transporting,
handling and exporting operation of these fruits. The physical properties, which
have been measured of the potato tubers, include length, width, thickness,
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
205
volume, mass, density, shape index, length shape and thickness shape the
physical properties, which have been measured of the Navel orange fruits,
include length, diameter, shape index, volume, mass and density as tabulated in
Table 2.
Table 2: Physical properties for Cara potato and Navel orange.
Items
Crop
mm
ss, mm
index
shape,
ss
cm3
g/cm3
71.70
63.10
50.40
1.28
14.30
80.07
133.2
120.2
1.11
Orange 72.50
72.40
-----
1.00
-----
-----
191.50
230.3
0.8
Potato
88.00
81.00
66.00
1.53
45.90
99.00
198.00
185
1.25
Orange 84.00
84.00
------
1.10
------
------
295.00
153.0
0.5
Potato
55.00
50.00
41.00
1.09
0.13
61.98
77.00
70.0
0.9
Orange 60.00
63.00
-----
0.80
------
------
114.00
423.0
1.2
Potato
7.32
6.04
9.29
0.11
9.30
7.36
31.92
29.5
0.1
Orange
4.60
4.51
------
0.04
------
------
43.25
42.8
0.2
Potato
10.21
9.59
10.49
8.54
61.30
9.15
23.03
23.6
7.2
Orange
6.34
6.23
------
4.00
------
-----
22.64
18.6
18.8
Potato
Av.
Max.
Min.
S.D.
C.V.
2-.Mechanical properties:
a- Coefficient of friction :
206
minimum value was 0.41 due to using the smooth rubber sheet surface with
Navel orange.
b-.Rolling angle:
The rolling angle was an important factor which was used for
determining the slope of the inner surface of tuber tank in addition to determine
the slope of the transport belts. The rolling angle on smooth sheet rubber and
galvanized sheet surfaces for potato tubers and orange fruits have been
measured. The experimental work has been conducted at one position of fruit
movement where the long axis of fruit was laid vertical to the direction of
motion.
The obtained values of rolling angle at smooth sheet rubber and
galvanized sheet surfaces were 0.27 rad ( 15.7 deg) and 0.29 rad (16.59 deg)
respectively, for the Cara potato. The corresponding values for Navel orange
were 0.08 rad (4.59 degree) and 0.11 rad ( 6.45 degree) using smooth sheet
rubber and galvanized steel surfaces, respectively. It can be noticed that the
rolling angle on the smooth sheet rubber surface was smaller than which was
recorded with the galvanized steel surface for the two tested fruits. However,
the potato tubers recorded higher angles of rolling than which were achieved
with the orange fruits.
c- Impact height:
The effect of increasing the feed chain speed from 0.14 to 0.24 m/s on
the grading efficiency of the constructed automatic grading prototype for all
speeds of weight and grading unit belt in range of 0.3 - 0.75 m/s and at two
positions of starting weight of 0.08 and 0.125 m under different fruits ( Cara
potato and Navel orange ) has been indicated in Table 3. It can be noticed that
increasing the feeding chain speed during the grading process tended to
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
207
decrease the grading efficiency of the automatic grading prototype for all the
belt speeds and starting weight position under two different grading crops.
The obtained grading efficiencies from the automatic grading prototype
were 91.7, 88.2, 63.3 and 55 % at feed chain speeds of 0.14, 0.17, 0.21 and 0.24
m/s respectively, with belt speed of 0.3 and starting weight position of 0.08 m
for the Cara potato. The other belt speeds and starting weight positions had the
same above mentioned trend. The results indicated that increasing the feed
chain speed from 0.14 to 0.24 m/s caused a corresponding decrease in the
grading efficiency of the automatic grading prototype of about 40 % at 0.30
m/s weight belt speed and 0.08 m starting weight position. This trend may be
attributed to increase the fruit speed on the weight unit belt as a result to
increase feeding chain speed consequently, decrease the fruit stay interval on
belt thus, decrease the accuracy of the weight and increase the overlapping
percentage which tends to decrease the efficiency.
Also, the feed chain speed of 0.14 m/s achieved the maximum grading
efficiency compared with the other feed speeds for all the belt speeds and
starting weight positions. While, the minimum grading efficiency had been
obtained with the maximum feeding chain speed of 0.24 m/s. Using the
automatic control for adjusting speed of the feeding chain by means of
electronic circuits has been caused increasing the feed uniformity consequently,
increasing the grading efficiency.
Table 3: Effect of feed speed on the grading efficiency as percentage of Cara
potato and Navel orange fruits under different weight belt speeds and
starting weight positions.
Feed
speed,
m/s
Starting
weight
position,
Navel orange
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.75
0.080
91.7
91.5
86.0
85.0
95.0
94.2
93.3
88.0
0.125
95.0
95.0
89.0
88.0
98.3
98.0
96.7
93.3
0.080
88.2
85.0
85.0
82.5
94.0
93.3
90.0
85.8
0.125
92.5
90.0
87.5
85.0
96.0
95.7
93.3
88.3
0.080
63.3
72.5
80.0
82.5
63.3
80.0
82.0
83.0
0.125
67.5
77.5
84.2
85.0
65.8
84.2
85.0
86.0
0.080
55.0
63.3
65.0
79.2
60.0
71.7
78.3
79.0
0.125
61.7
68.3
70.0
82.5
65.0
78.3
81.7
82.0
0.14
0.17
0.21
0.24
208
From Table 3, it has been concluded that, at the lowest values of feeding
chain speeds (0.14 and 0.17 m/s), increasing the weight belt speed tended to
decrease the grading efficiency of the automatic grading prototype at all the
starting weight positions and the tested fruits.. But, the grading efficiency of the
automatic grading prototype increased when the speed of weight belt increased
at the highest values of feeding speeds (0.21 and 0.24 m/s).
However, at the minimum values of feeding chain speeds, increasing the
weight belt speed tended to decrease the grading efficiency for all the starting
weight positions and graded fruits. This trend may be attributed to decrease the
fruit stay interval on the weight and grading unit belt consequently, increasing
the fruit weight interval until the pocket of Synchronous feed unit was opened
which caused overlapping as a result to vary the synchronization time.
But, the grading efficiency of the automatic grading prototype has been
increased when the weight belt speed was increased at the maximum values of
the feeding chain speeds for all the starting weight positions and the graded
fruits. The reason for this was due to increase the fruit stay interval on the
feeding chain therefore the fruit take the same weight belt speed and
synchronize with the pocket of synchronous feed unit opening.
The results also indicated that the weight belt speeds of 0.30 m/s
recorded the highest grading efficiency at the minimum values of feeding chain
speeds ( 0.14 and 0.17 m/s) while, it achieved the lowest grading efficiency at
the maximum values of feed chain speeds (0.21 and 0.24 m/s) for all the other
variables under study. From Table 3, it can be noticed that the results for
grading Navel orange fruits take the same above maintained trend for Cara
potato tubers.
c- Effect of starting weight position on the grading efficiency:
The obtained data in Table 3 represents the values of grading efficiency
as affected by the starting weight position under different speeds of feedi chain
and weight belt for the Cara potato and Navel orange. It can be noticed that, for
all the feeding chain and weight belt speeds, the starting weight position of
0.125 m has been accomplished the maximum values of grading efficiency
compared with the 0.08 m starting weight position for both type of graded
fruits.
It can be also seen from the same Table, for all the starting weight
positions, feeding chain and weight belt speeds, the grading efficiency of the
automatic grading prototype was higher at grading the orange fruits compared
with the Cara potato tubers. This reason may be due to increase the uniformity
of fruit shape, which has a spherical shape, consequently increasing the
accuracy of the weight thus, increasing the grading efficiency. But, the potato
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
209
tubers had not uniform shape which affects on the weight accuracy therefore,
the grading efficiency.
Finally, the effect of study variables on the grading efficiency could be
concluded as follows:
for all the weight belt speeds and starting weight positions, increasing the
feeding chain speed tended to decrease the grading efficiency for the
automatic grading prototype.
The optimum conditions for grading both Cara potato tubers and Navel
orange fruits, which had been recorded the maximum grading efficiency, were
using the automatic grading prototype at feeding chain speed of 0.14 m/s,
weight belt speed of 0.30 m / s and weight starting position of 0.125 m.
4- Productivity of automatic grading prototype:
Feed speed,
m/s
Potato tubers
Orange fruits
0.14
0.369
0.530
0.17
0.448
0.644
0.21
0.553
0.795
0.24
0.632
0.909
210
Efficiency
Productivity
100
100
0.9
90
0.9
90
80
0.7
70
0.6
60
0.5
50
0.4
0.3
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.24
40
0.26
0.8
G r a d in g e f f ic i e n c y
P r o d u c t iv it y
0.8
P r o d u c tiv i ty
Efficiency
80
0.7
70
0.6
60
0.5
50
0.4
0.3
0.12
G r a d i n g e f f ic ie n c y
Productivity
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.22
0.24
40
0.26
211
The power required for operating the automatic grading prototype had
been consumed for driving both of feeding unit chain, distribution disk and
weight and grading unit belt as well as the power required for operating the
solenoid of synchronization unit. The automatic grading prototype has been
operated at 220 volt and 1.7 ambere so, the power required for grading
prototype operation was approximately constant i.e. 0.374 kW at the different
operating conditions. The data listed in Table 5 represent the calculated power
unit for operating the automatic grading prototype as affected by the different
feeding chain speeds under two different types of the graded crops.
Table 5: The Power unit consumed during grading Cara potato tubers
and Navel orange fruits.
The power unit consumed, kW/Mg
Feed speed,
m/s
Potato tubers
Orange fruits
0.14
1.01
0.71
0.17
0.83
0.58
0.21
0.68
0.47
0.24
0.59
0.41
6-Cost analysis:
1. The grading efficiency of the automatic grading prototype has been increased
when the feed chain speed decreased for all the weight belt speeds and
starting weight positions under two graded fruits.
212
2. The results indicated at the lowest values of feeding chain speed (0.14 and
0.17 m/s), increasing the weight belt speed tended to decrease the grading
efficiency of the automatic grading prototype at all the starting weight
positions and the tested fruits
3. For all the feeding chain and weight belt speeds, the starting weight position
of 0.125 m has been accomplished the maximum values of grading efficiency
compared wit the 0.08 m starting weight position with the different graded
fruits.
4. The automatic grading prototype recorded higher grading efficiencies with
the orange fruits compared with the potato tubers for all the starting weight
positions, feeding speed chain and weight belt speeds.
5. The optimum conditions for grading both Cara potato tubers and Navel
orange fruits, which had been recorded the maximum grading efficiency,
were using the automatic grading prototype at feed chain speed of 0.14 m/s,
weight belt speed of 0.30 m/s and starting weight position of 0.125 m.
6. The productivity of grading prototype increased as a result to increase the
feeding chain speed for the two graded fruits. Increasing the feeding chain
speed from 0.14 to 0.24 m/s tended to increase the productivity of the
automatic grading prototype by 71.3 % during grading the potato tubers.
7. The obtained productivity during grading the orange fruits were higher than
which were given with the potato tubers for all the feed chain speeds.
8. The power required for grading prototype operation was approximately
constant i.e. 0.374 kW at the different operating conditions.
9. The power unit consumed for driving and operating the automatic grading
prototype decreased when the feeding chain speed increased for the two
graded fruits.
10. The total cost of Cara tubers grading using the automatic grading prototype
was 10.49 LE/ Mg while it was 7.3 LE/ Mg for orange fruits. For all the
feeding chain speeds, the grading costs for orange fruits were less than which
were recorded with potato tubers. This may be attributed to increase the
grading productivity in case of grading orange fruits compared with potato
tubers.
5. REFERENCES
Abd-Alla, H. El.; S.M. Radwan ; M.M. El-Kholy and M.S. Radwan (2000).
A weight grading machine for different fruits and vegetable Misr J. Agric.
Eng., 17(3): 675-696.
One American dollars = 5.85 Egyptian pound (LE) according to price of 2005.
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
213
214
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
] [ : ) ( ) (
] [ . . . . ) : /(.
] [ . . . . ) : / (.
] [ . .
.
:
. /
. / .
) (
./ ./ . .
.
) ./( ./ . .
.
. / . /
.
- - - .
.
- - - .
.
.
.
- -.
= .
Misr J. Ag. Eng., January 2006
215
.
/ . / .
::
.
.
. :
. /.
. /.
..
.
.
.
) (
= .
216