Sie sind auf Seite 1von 157

Clark, Matt

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:16 PM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Anyluck?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
To: 'George Lockwood'
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA
1

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:16 PM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Anyluck?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
To: 'George Lockwood'
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA
3

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:16 PM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Anyluck?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
To: 'George Lockwood'
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA
5

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:16 PM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Anyluck?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
To: 'George Lockwood'
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA
7

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:16 PM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Anyluck?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
To: 'George Lockwood'
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA
9

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

10

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:16 PM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Anyluck?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
To: 'George Lockwood'
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA
11

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

12

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 1:58 PM
George Lockwood
wfitz122
; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'
Shrewsbury Boro - 20% ADP Data

George

PleasemaketheShrewsbury20%ADPdataavailabletoBillFitzpatrick(Shrewsbury).

Pleasereplywhentheassessorhasbeengivenaccesstothefile.

Asalways,thankyouforyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

13

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 1:58 PM
George Lockwood
wfitz122
; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'
Shrewsbury Boro - 20% ADP Data

George

PleasemaketheShrewsbury20%ADPdataavailabletoBillFitzpatrick(Shrewsbury).

Pleasereplywhentheassessorhasbeengivenaccesstothefile.

Asalways,thankyouforyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

14

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 1:58 PM
George Lockwood
wfitz122
; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'
Shrewsbury Boro - 20% ADP Data

George

PleasemaketheShrewsbury20%ADPdataavailabletoBillFitzpatrick(Shrewsbury).

Pleasereplywhentheassessorhasbeengivenaccesstothefile.

Asalways,thankyouforyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

15

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 1:58 PM
George Lockwood
wfitz122
; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'
Shrewsbury Boro - 20% ADP Data

George

PleasemaketheShrewsbury20%ADPdataavailabletoBillFitzpatrick(Shrewsbury).

Pleasereplywhentheassessorhasbeengivenaccesstothefile.

Asalways,thankyouforyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

16

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 1:58 PM
George Lockwood
wfitz122
; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'
Shrewsbury Boro - 20% ADP Data

George

PleasemaketheShrewsbury20%ADPdataavailabletoBillFitzpatrick(Shrewsbury).

Pleasereplywhentheassessorhasbeengivenaccesstothefile.

Asalways,thankyouforyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(7
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

17

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 1:58 PM
George Lockwood
wfitz122
; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'
Shrewsbury Boro - 20% ADP Data

George

PleasemaketheShrewsbury20%ADPdataavailabletoBillFitzpatrick(Shrewsbury).

Pleasereplywhentheassessorhasbeengivenaccesstothefile.

Asalways,thankyouforyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

18

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,
19


DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

20

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,
21


DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

22

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,
23


DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

24

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,
25


DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

26

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,
27


DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

28

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, January 05, 2015 10:08 AM
'George Lockwood'
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
RE: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

HopeyouhadaniceNewYear.

Scottjustinformedusthathehasnotreceivedthe20%ADPdata.

IsthereanissuewithScott'ssystem,file,etc?

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:12 PM
To: George Lockwood
Cc: simbriaco@tintonfalls.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'
Subject: Tinton Falls - 20% ADP Data

George

Hopealliswell.

PleasemaketheRDS20%inspectionfileforTintonFallsavailabletothemunicipality'sassessor.

Thankyouverymuchforyourassistance.

Regards,
29


DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

30

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Imbriaco, Michael <MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
Daniel M. Kelly
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; Michael Panter
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Categories:

Red Category

Dan,

Iwouldstillpreferacopyofthephotosonadiskplease.Hopeyouhaveagreatholidaytoo.

Thanks,

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
To: Imbriaco, Michael
Cc: neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


31

Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
32

onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
33

www.rdsnj.com

34

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

35

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
36

electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

37

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

38

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
39

electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

40

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

41

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
42

electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

43

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

44

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
45

electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

46

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

47

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
48

electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

49

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

50

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
51

electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

52

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Clark, Matt; 'Michael Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,

53

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
54

electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

55

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael
Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Subject:

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,
56


Mike Imbriaco, CTA
Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

57

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

58

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael
Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Subject:

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,
59


Mike Imbriaco, CTA
Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122@yahoo.com; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

60

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

61

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael
Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Subject:

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,
62


Mike Imbriaco, CTA
Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

63

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

64

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael
Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Subject:

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,
65


Mike Imbriaco, CTA
Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

66

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

67

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael
Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Subject:

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,
68


Mike Imbriaco, CTA
Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

69

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

70

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael
Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Subject:

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,
71


Mike Imbriaco, CTA
Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

72

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

73

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:59 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'Michael
Panter'; 'DK RDS'
RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Subject:

Mike

IspoketoMatt,theCountyisafewdaysawayfromhavingthephotosintheOPRSandappealsystem.Ifyouwould
like,wecancreateadiskintheinterimfewdayspleaseadvise.

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthephotos,loading,availableview,youcancertainlyreachoutforMatt.

Ifwedontspeakprior,haveahappyholidayseason.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Michael Panter
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; neil@realtyappraisal.net; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

Mike,

IaskedDanaboutthisafewweeksagoandhetoldmetospeakwithMattbecausetheCountyhasourphotos.Iwould
likemyphotosfromRDS,regardlessiftheCountyhasthem.Pleasesendmeafileand/ordiscofthephotosforFreehold
Township.Thankyou.

Sincerely,
74


Mike Imbriaco, CTA
Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 294-2045 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:12 PM
To: ALEX WORTH; ALEX WORTH - Manalapan; BERNIE HANEY - NEPTUNE T / SEA GIRT; BILL LAIRD - COLTS
NECK/FARMINGDALE; CHARLES HECK; CHARLES HECK - Middletown; DONNA TAYLOR - ROOSEVELT; DONNA TAYLOR UPPER FREEHOLD; ED MULLANE - BBEACH; ELLEN MARCHETTI - HOLMDEL; ERIC ZENETTI; ERICK AGUIAR; ERICK
AGUIAR - HOLMDEL; GAIL SCAGLION; GREG HUTCHINSON; GREGORY HUTCHINSON - FHaven; JAY BRISCIONE - Shrews
T / LSilver; MARK FITZPATRICK - ENGLISHTOWN; Imbriaco, Michael; MITCH ELIAS; PETER J. BARNETT; RENEE
FROTTON; SCOTT IMBRIACO; SCOTT KINEAVY; TIMOTHY ANFUSO; VICTORIA BUTCHON; VICTORIA BUTCHON;
wfitz122
; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK - NEPTUNE C
Cc: Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein; bsherwood@rdsnj.com; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: Assessment Demonstration Program - 2015 Planning/Budgeting

2014/2015RDSClients:

Wehopethatyouareenjoyingtheholidayseason,andwanttotouchbaseonseveralissuesasthefirstyearofthe
AssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP)iscomingtoaclose.Ifyouarereceivingthismessage,themunicipality
(ormunicipalities)inwhichyouserveastheTaxAssessorbeganimplementingtheADPin2014,orisscheduledtodoso
in2015.

Thereareseveralcritical/timesensitiveissueswhichwedliketohighlight,andasalways,pleasefeelfreetocontactus
ifyouhaveanyquestions.Wealsocontinuetoappreciateyoursuggestionsonimprovingourprocess,whichhavebeen
invaluableduringthefirst(andhencebusiest)yearoftheADPimplementation.

Budgeting

Asareminder,ifyouwouldlikeRDStoperformanyadditionalservicesforyourmunicipality,beyondthoserelatingto
ourannual20%inspections,theseitemsshouldbebudgetedduringreorganization(orotherapplicable)meetingsatthe
onsetof2015.TheseservicesincludeAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessment(Class3B)inspections,additional
propertyphotos,electronicsketchesofClass3orotherpropertiesnotcontainedinyourcurrentMicrosystemsfiles,or
otherspecialprojects.

Whileweperformedtheseservicesformanyclientsduring2014,therewerealsoanumberofclientswhoneededour
assistancewiththeseprojectsbutdidnothavefundsbudgetedforthosepurposes.

Also,ifyouareamongthesmallgroupofmunicipalitiesforwhichADPinspectionswerenotfullycompletedin2014,
pleasebeadvisedthatyour2014and2015inspections(40%oftotallineitems)willbecompletedconcurrentlyduring
2015.Forthisreason,pleaseensurethatyour2014ADPbudgetinghasbeenproperlyrolledoverforthisproject,in
additiontoyour2015funding.

ServiceElections

Inordertoplanmostefficientlyandtocompleteourclientprojectsinatimelymanner,weareimplementingaprocess
whichwehopewillsimplifythecoordinationbetweenRDSandeachmunicipalclient.Thisprocessisalsobasedupon
inputreceivedfromTaxAssessors,aswellasourexperienceduringtheinitialADPimplementation.

75

PleasenotifyusbyFebruary1,2015ifyourmunicipalityiselectingtohaveRDSperformanyoftheadditionalservices
listedabove(mostnotablyAdded/OmittedandFarmlandAssessmentinspections,additionalphotosand/or
electronicClass3sketches).Followingapositiveelection,RDSwillcontinuetoperformsuchservicesineach
subsequentyearabsentanoticetodiscontinuetheseprojectsbyFeb1ofanygivenyear.Similarly,RDSwillnot
performsuchadditionalservicesinanyyear,untilanoticetodosoisreceivedpriortoFeb1oftheyearinwhichyoud
liketheseservicestocommence.

Added/OmittedInspections

InordertocompletetheseinspectionswellinadvanceofyourowndeadlinefordatasubmissiontoMonmouthCounty,
pleaseprovideyourpreliminaryAdded/OmittedlisttoRDSbyFebruary1(whichwouldincludeanyrolloversfromthe
previousyear),andafinallistbyJune1ofeachyear.IfyourmunicipalityregularlyupdatestheirpermitfileinMODIV,
thiswouldbethedeliverabletoRDS.Ifthepermitfileisnotregularlyupdated,pleaseensurethatthelistprovides
adequatedescriptionsoftheconstruction/improvementprojectsthatourinspectorswillbereviewing,sincenon
specificdescriptions(improvementseg)makeitdifficultforourinspectorstoprovideyouwithqualityinspectiondata.

Also,asmanyofushavediscussedalready,ifamunicipalityelectstohaveRDSperformAdded/Omittedinspections,this
electionwillpertaintoallpropertieswithoutstandingpermits,andwewillnotbeabletoperforminspectionsononly
selectproperties(withtheremainderbeingperformedinternallybytheAssessorsofficeofbyotherthirdparties).

Thankyouforyourattentiontotheseissues,aswestrivetocontinuallyimproveourworkonyourbehalf.Wegenuinely
appreciatetheopportunitytoworkwithyouandlookforwardtodoingsointheyearsahead.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

76

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:21 PM
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com
'DK RDS'; Clark, Matt
Tinton Falls 20% ADP Data

Scott

Arequesttomakethe20%ADPdataavailablewasmadetoMicroSystems.

TheNOTESscreenwasupdatedwhenapplicable/availablewithinformation(i.e.2006SWW).

ThankyouforyourpatienceinthisfirstyearoftheADP.RDSisstreamliningsomeprocessesandenhancingthe
deliverableinanefforttoprovidetheMonmouthCountyassessmentcommunitythenecessarydatatoperformyour
duties.

Isincerelyappreciateyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

77

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:21 PM
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com
'DK RDS'; Clark, Matt
Tinton Falls 20% ADP Data

Scott

Arequesttomakethe20%ADPdataavailablewasmadetoMicroSystems.

TheNOTESscreenwasupdatedwhenapplicable/availablewithinformation(i.e.2006SWW).

ThankyouforyourpatienceinthisfirstyearoftheADP.RDSisstreamliningsomeprocessesandenhancingthe
deliverableinanefforttoprovidetheMonmouthCountyassessmentcommunitythenecessarydatatoperformyour
duties.

Isincerelyappreciateyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

78

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:21 PM
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com
'DK RDS'; Clark, Matt
Tinton Falls 20% ADP Data

Scott

Arequesttomakethe20%ADPdataavailablewasmadetoMicroSystems.

TheNOTESscreenwasupdatedwhenapplicable/availablewithinformation(i.e.2006SWW).

ThankyouforyourpatienceinthisfirstyearoftheADP.RDSisstreamliningsomeprocessesandenhancingthe
deliverableinanefforttoprovidetheMonmouthCountyassessmentcommunitythenecessarydatatoperformyour
duties.

Isincerelyappreciateyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

79

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:21 PM
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com
'DK RDS'; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Tinton Falls 20% ADP Data

Scott

Arequesttomakethe20%ADPdataavailablewasmadetoMicroSystems.

TheNOTESscreenwasupdatedwhenapplicable/availablewithinformation(i.e.2006SWW).

ThankyouforyourpatienceinthisfirstyearoftheADP.RDSisstreamliningsomeprocessesandenhancingthe
deliverableinanefforttoprovidetheMonmouthCountyassessmentcommunitythenecessarydatatoperformyour
duties.

Isincerelyappreciateyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

80

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:21 PM
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com
'DK RDS'; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Tinton Falls 20% ADP Data

Scott

Arequesttomakethe20%ADPdataavailablewasmadetoMicroSystems.

TheNOTESscreenwasupdatedwhenapplicable/availablewithinformation(i.e.2006SWW).

ThankyouforyourpatienceinthisfirstyearoftheADP.RDSisstreamliningsomeprocessesandenhancingthe
deliverableinanefforttoprovidetheMonmouthCountyassessmentcommunitythenecessarydatatoperformyour
duties.

Isincerelyappreciateyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

81

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:21 PM
simbriaco@tintonfalls.com
'DK RDS'; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Tinton Falls 20% ADP Data

Scott

Arequesttomakethe20%ADPdataavailablewasmadetoMicroSystems.

TheNOTESscreenwasupdatedwhenapplicable/availablewithinformation(i.e.2006SWW).

ThankyouforyourpatienceinthisfirstyearoftheADP.RDSisstreamliningsomeprocessesandenhancingthe
deliverableinanefforttoprovidetheMonmouthCountyassessmentcommunitythenecessarydatatoperformyour
duties.

Isincerelyappreciateyourefforts.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

82

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Theresa Casagrande <tcasagrande@fhboro.net>


Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:00 PM
Michael Panter; Neil Rubenstein; Dan Kelly
Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Mike, Needless to say, this response is only going to the individuals copied on my original email, as I cant
violate the OPMA. I appreciate your response, but I still feel that the interior inspection percentage is deficient;
for now, lets agree that it is a glass half empty/half full issue. Going forward, I think there are things that we
could and should do to bring the interior inspection percentage up, which we can discuss before next years
inspections. I full well realize that the sales data is what will be used to adjust assessed values annually and that
could be done without any inspections at all. Please consider that in a town like Fair Haven it is most likely that
our total assessed value will continue to rise, or fall, disproportionally to many other municipalities in
Monmouth County; as such, my residents County taxes will continue to rise annually, even if the Freeholders
hold the line on tax increases and the ADP makes that process even more convenient, at our expense no less.
For that reason alone, it is important that I have the ability to make assurances to our residents that the process
is efficient, fair, and effective. Lastly, even though the individual and collective analytical abilities of the
recipients of this email are impressive, I would advise against getting into a mathematical point/counter point
with Jon Peters. I think this issue dissipates best if we agree that we will work together to get make sure our
property records are as up to date and accurate as possible. All the best, Theresa

______________________________________
Theresa S. Casagrande, MBA, RMC, CTC, NJMMA Executive Board Member
Administrator, Borough of Fair Haven
748 River Road
Fair Haven, NJ 07704
tcasagrande@fhboro.net
Phone # 732-747-0241
Fax # 732-747-6962
From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:06 PM
To: Theresa Casagrande; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; 'Clark, Matt'; blucarelli@verizon.net; jpeters@mail.csi.cuny.edu;
JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com; row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Ms.Casagrande:

Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.

SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.
83


IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.

Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.

84

Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.

Process

(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.

(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).

(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.

(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.

However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.

Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

85

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.

FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.

Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as a
potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa

ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.

Regards,Mike
86

87

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Theresa Casagrande <tcasagrande@fhboro.net>


Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:00 PM
Michael Panter; Neil Rubenstein; Dan Kelly
Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Mike, Needless to say, this response is only going to the individuals copied on my original email, as I cant
violate the OPMA. I appreciate your response, but I still feel that the interior inspection percentage is deficient;
for now, lets agree that it is a glass half empty/half full issue. Going forward, I think there are things that we
could and should do to bring the interior inspection percentage up, which we can discuss before next years
inspections. I full well realize that the sales data is what will be used to adjust assessed values annually and that
could be done without any inspections at all. Please consider that in a town like Fair Haven it is most likely that
our total assessed value will continue to rise, or fall, disproportionally to many other municipalities in
Monmouth County; as such, my residents County taxes will continue to rise annually, even if the Freeholders
hold the line on tax increases and the ADP makes that process even more convenient, at our expense no less.
For that reason alone, it is important that I have the ability to make assurances to our residents that the process
is efficient, fair, and effective. Lastly, even though the individual and collective analytical abilities of the
recipients of this email are impressive, I would advise against getting into a mathematical point/counter point
with Jon Peters. I think this issue dissipates best if we agree that we will work together to get make sure our
property records are as up to date and accurate as possible. All the best, Theresa

______________________________________
Theresa S. Casagrande, MBA, RMC, CTC, NJMMA Executive Board Member
Administrator, Borough of Fair Haven
748 River Road
Fair Haven, NJ 07704
tcasagrande@fhboro.net
Phone # 732-747-0241
Fax # 732-747-6962
From: Michael Panter [mailto:mpanter@rdsnj.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:06 PM
To: Theresa Casagrande; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; 'Clark, Matt'; blucarelli@verizon.net; jpeters@mail.csi.cuny.edu;
JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com; row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Ms.Casagrande:

Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.

SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.
88


IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.

Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.

89

Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.

Process

(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.

(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).

(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.

(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.

However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.

Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

90

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.

FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.

Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as a
potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa

ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.

Regards,Mike
91

92

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Jonathan Peters <Jonathan.Peters@csi.cuny.edu>


Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:53 PM
Michael Panter; 'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; Clark, Matt; blucarelli@verizon.net; JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com; row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com;
Jaeger2340@gmail.com
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Mr. Panter,
I believe that your math is incorrect as to the success rate. Perhaps we can discuss further.
If you achieve a 56% rate of interior inspections in each year - at the end of this 5 year cycle you will have only inspected
56%* of the interiors in Fair Haven (or any town). This is significantly lower than the 82% achieved in the prior
revaluation.
Given the existing run rate of 56%, by my calculations RDS will have to achieve an 88.5% success rate in the next four
years to reach the prior 82% success rate. In plain fact, we have about 2175 properties in Fair Haven and we have
already missed 191 in 2014. That leaves a mere 200 properties that can be missed in the next four years if we are to
achieve just a match to the revaluation rate of 82% for the five year process. That is 50 misses per year.
We are apparently not on a run rate to make only 50 misses per year using current practice.
Please advise.
Jon Peters
Fair Haven Borough Council President
* Actually 54.4% of total properties (not excluding refusals)

Jonathan R. Peters, Ph.D.


Professor of Finance &
Chair of Accounting and Finance Department
The College of Staten Island
School of Business
Room 3N-220
2800 Victory Blvd.
Staten Island, NY 10314
&
Member of the Doctoral Faculty
The Ph.D. Program in Earth and Environmental Science &
The Ph.D. Program in Economics
The CUNY Graduate School
From: Michael Panter [mpanter@rdsnj.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:05 PM
To: 'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
Cc: 'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; 'Clark, Matt'; blucarelli@verizon.net; Jonathan Peters; JAKoch73
rkmesq@aol.com; row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection
93

Ms.Casagrande:
Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.
SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.
IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.
Regards,Mike
Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

94

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.
Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.
Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.
Process
(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.
(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).
(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.
(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.
However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.
Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
95

propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.
FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.
Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as
a potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

96

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa
ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.
Regards,Mike

CelebrateItalianHeritagewithaSpecialBroadwayBenefitConcertbytheWorldsLongestRunningPhantom
insupportoftheCSIItalianStudiesprogram>

97

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Jonathan Peters <Jonathan.Peters@csi.cuny.edu>


Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:53 PM
Michael Panter; 'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; Clark, Matt; blucarelli@verizon.net; JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com; row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com;
Jaeger2340@gmail.com
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Mr. Panter,
I believe that your math is incorrect as to the success rate. Perhaps we can discuss further.
If you achieve a 56% rate of interior inspections in each year - at the end of this 5 year cycle you will have only inspected
56%* of the interiors in Fair Haven (or any town). This is significantly lower than the 82% achieved in the prior
revaluation.
Given the existing run rate of 56%, by my calculations RDS will have to achieve an 88.5% success rate in the next four
years to reach the prior 82% success rate. In plain fact, we have about 2175 properties in Fair Haven and we have
already missed 191 in 2014. That leaves a mere 200 properties that can be missed in the next four years if we are to
achieve just a match to the revaluation rate of 82% for the five year process. That is 50 misses per year.
We are apparently not on a run rate to make only 50 misses per year using current practice.
Please advise.
Jon Peters
Fair Haven Borough Council President
* Actually 54.4% of total properties (not excluding refusals)

Jonathan R. Peters, Ph.D.


Professor of Finance &
Chair of Accounting and Finance Department
The College of Staten Island
School of Business
Room 3N-220
2800 Victory Blvd.
Staten Island, NY 10314
&
Member of the Doctoral Faculty
The Ph.D. Program in Earth and Environmental Science &
The Ph.D. Program in Economics
The CUNY Graduate School
From: Michael Panter [mpanter@rdsnj.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:05 PM
To: 'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
Cc: 'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; 'Clark, Matt'; blucarelli@verizon.net; Jonathan Peters; JAKoch73@aol.com;
rkmesq@aol.com; row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection
98

Ms.Casagrande:
Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.
SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.
IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.
Regards,Mike
Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

99

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.
Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.
Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.
Process
(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.
(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).
(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.
(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.
However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.
Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
100

propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.
FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.
Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as
a potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

101

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa
ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.
Regards,Mike

CelebrateItalianHeritagewithaSpecialBroadwayBenefitConcertbytheWorldsLongestRunningPhantom
insupportoftheCSIItalianStudiesprogram>

102

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Michael Panter <mpanter@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:06 PM
'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; Clark, Matt; blucarelli@verizon.net;
jpeters@mail.csi.cuny.edu; JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com;
row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Ms.Casagrande:

Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.

SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.

IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
103

IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.

Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.

Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.

Process

(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.

(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).

(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.

(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.

104

However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.

Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.

FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.

Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

105

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as a
potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa

ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.

Regards,Mike

106

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Michael Panter <mpanter@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:06 PM
'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; Clark, Matt; blucarelli@verizon.net;
jpeters@mail.csi.cuny.edu; JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com;
row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Ms.Casagrande:

Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.

SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.

IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
107

IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.

Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.

Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.

Process

(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.

(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).

(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.

(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.

108

However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.

Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.

FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.

Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

109

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as a
potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa

ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.

Regards,Mike

110

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Michael Panter <mpanter@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:06 PM
'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; 'Clark, Matt'; blucarelli@verizon.net;
jpeters@mail.csi.cuny.edu; JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com;
row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Ms.Casagrande:

Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.

SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.

IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
111

IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.

Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.

Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.

Process

(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.

(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).

(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.

(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.

112

However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.

Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.

FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.

Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

113

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as a
potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa

ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.

Regards,Mike

114

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Michael Panter <mpanter@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:06 PM
'Theresa Casagrande'; 'Dan Kelly'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
'Gregory Hutchinson'; 'Salvatore Alfieri'; 'Clark, Matt'; blucarelli@verizon.net;
jpeters@mail.csi.cuny.edu; JAKoch73
; rkmesq@aol.com;
row.wilhelm@gmail.com; Susan.Sorensen@sprint.com; Jaeger2340@gmail.com
RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Ms.Casagrande:

Thankyouforyourmessage,andasmentionedpreviously,wealwayswelcomeinputandwouldbehappytoanswerany
questions.SinceIknowyoumentionedthatyourgoverningbodywouldshareyourconcernsre:ourJulyInvoice,Ihave
copiedthemonthismessageinanefforttoprovideasmuchinformationandfeedbackaspossible,andtheyshouldalso
feelfreetocontactmewithanyinput/questions.

SinceothercountiesarealsoimplementingtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram(theADP),andithasbegunto
receivepositivecoveragebythirdpartiesaswell(includingMoodys),weappreciatefeedbackaseveryoneseeksto
refinetheprocessduringtheinitialyearoftheADP.

IhaveinsertedmycommentsinREDbelowwhichcorrespondtoyourquestions,whichIhopearehelpful.

Regards,Mike

Michael J. Panter, Esq.

55 White Road, Suite C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: 732.276.1057
Fax: 732.276.1056
www.rdsnj.com

From: Theresa Casagrande [mailto:tcasagrande@fhboro.net]


Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Michael Panter; Dan Kelly; Neil Rubenstein
Cc: Gregory Hutchinson; Salvatore Alfieri; Clark, Matt
Subject: RE: Fair Haven - 2014 Data Collection

Gentlemen, Regarding the email exchange below, which took place between myself and RDS in early June; as
well as the attached, please note that in Fair Haven there were a total of 198 properties that were not able to be
interiorly inspected as part of our first 20% annual property inspections. While I realize the contract allows you
to deduct these properties from the total to reach your contractual benchmark and that the Borough is required
to pay you $21.00 a property regardless, since we are so early in this program, I really think this needs to be
looked at in some detail. I could go on and on, but my general thoughts on this topic are briefly stated, as
follows:
115

IwillfocusonClass2(residential)propertieswithrespecttoyourconcernoverourinteriorsuccessrate,sincethey
accountforthebulkof2014inspections.Ofthe435residentialpropertiesonthe2014schedule,therewere12
refusals,whichamounttoarefusalrateof2.75%.Thiswasaverygoodrefusalrate,whichIbelievewaspusheddown
duetothenumberofhomeownerswespokewithdirectly.Anumberofhomeownerscontactedourofficeafter
receivingnotice,whowereinitiallyhesitanttoallowaninteriorinspectionuntilweexplainedthepurposeafterwhich,
mostwereagreeable.Someofthesehomeownerscontactedusbecausetheywerealsovisitedlastyearpursuantto
therevaluation,toinquirewhytheywerebeinginspectedagain.Iwouldexpectthenumberofhomeownerswiththat
particularquestiontodecreaseinsubsequentyears,sinceeachannual20%ofinspectionswillbeanotheryearremoved
fromtherevaluation.

Forcomparativepurposes,duringthe2013revaluation(whichincludesthree(3)visits,comparedtotwo(2)underthe
ADP)therewasarefusalratewas5.8%.

Ofthe423nonrefusals,wecompletedanexteriorinspectionon100%ofproperties,whichallowsustoconfirmifany
exteriorwork/improvementshavebeenmade,andtoverifythefootprintofthehometoassessifanyadditionshave
beenadded.Wecompletedaninteriorinspectionof237properties,or56%ofproperties.

It would seem to me that whatever quality controls that RDS has in place to insure that you will
maximize our interior success rate within the two visit framework should be reviewed, as you didnt
manage to complete an interior inspection for 44% of this years 20% requirement.

Iwillsummarizeourprocessaimedatmaximizingtheinteriorsuccessratewithinthetwo(2)visitframework,
andwearealwaysopentoanysuggestions.SincetheADPrequirestwo(2)inspections(inthiscaseforpricing
of$21/property)comparedtothree(3)inspectionsunderrevaluations(generally$60$70/property;with
additionalservicesincluded),wedoanticipatethattheinteriorratewillbelessthanthatofarevaluation(more
below),thoughwereeffectivelyconductingeachvisitatapricesignificantlylessthanthatofarevaluation.

Process

(1)Allhomeownersreceivenotificationmailingsatleasttwoweekspriortoinspections,whichexplainthe
upcominginspectionanditspurpose.

(2)Thehomeisvisitedandanexteriorinspectioniscompleted.Ifahomeownerdoesnotrespond,theyareleft
adoorhangerwhichagainexplainsthepurposeoftheinspection,andprovidesthemwithbothourphone
numberandtheinternetpagewhichallowsthemtomakeaconvenientappointmentforourrevisit,using
eithermethod,andtoaskquestions(directlytotheirinspector,orbyvisitingourFAQs).

(3)Wethenallowampletimetopassforhomeownerstomakeappointments,priortoreturningforsecond
visit.InFairHaven,homeownersweregiven1014daysminimum.

(4)Thehomeisthenvisitedasecondtime,eitherbyappointment,orifnoappointmentwasmade,ona
differentdayoftheweekand/ortimeinhopesoffindingahomeownerpresent.

As such, we will be paying you $4,158.00, without the benefit of the assurance that we have an accurate
property record card for these 198 properties.
Asmentioned,12ofthe198referencedwererefusals,witharefusalrateaboutofwhatwasexperienced
duringthe2013revaluation.Whileitisimpossibletocompleteaninteriorinspectionofallproperties,itmight
behelpfultocomparethedatacollectedbetweentheADPandthetraditionalrevaluationmodel.Underthe
2013revaluation,82%ofinteriorinspectionswerecompletedusingthethree(3)visitframeworkcomparedto
56%undertheADPtwo(2)visitmodel.

116

However,thelastrevaluationthatFairHavenperformed(priorto2013)wasin2003,soassumingasimilar
interiorrateatthattime,FairHavenwasinspectingtheinteriorsofabout82%ofpropertiesonceevery10year
period.Noinspections,otherthanAdded/Omittedor(possibly)appealinspectionsweredoneintheinterim
duringanyyear,andtheAssessoralsodidnotdoanyreassessments.

Ifweareabletoachievea55%to60%interiorinspectionrateduringeachfive(5)yearADPcycle,thetotal
percentageofinteriorinspectionsovereachten(10)yearperiodwilllikelysurpasswhatFairHavenhas
experiencedusingrevaluations.Also,sincepropertiesareinspectedonceeveryfive(5)yearperiodunderthe
ADP,itismuchmorelikelythatimprovementswillbecapturedinamoretimelymannerthaninthe
past.Takingallofthesemetricsintoaccount,FairHavenwilllikelyhavemoreaccurateinformationontheir
propertyrecordcardsthaninthepast,atapricewhichisabout33%lessduringany10yearperiod(withthe
Assessoralsobeingabletoadjustvaluationsannually,ratherthanhavingtowaitforrevaluations,ortoadjust
thempiecemealbasedonappeals).

I realize that we just came off of a full revaluation, so property record card accuracy is not nearly as big
a concern if we had otherwise not done so; however, with each year that passes, especially if this
demonstration program is to continue forward, that high a percentage of no interior inspections will
become increasingly troubling and problematic.
Pleaseseemycommentsabove.

Greg and I have already discussed that we need to compare the revaluation refusals with the 12 reinspection refusals to see if they are repeat refusals. We probably should do the same with the 186 did
not get inside properties too.

FairHavenhastheabilitytodothisbasedonthedatafieldsweprovided.Withrespecttorefusals,itwill
obviouslybeasmallsubset,sinceyouwouldbecomparingonly12refusalsthisyearfromwithinthe20%
inspected,comparedtothe118townwiderefusalsunderthe2013revaluation.Iagreehowever,thatthis
mightbeusefulastheAssessordetermineshowtoestimatetheseproperties.Idonotknowifyouwillfind
muchcorrelationbetweenthoseforwhichaninteriorwasnotachieved,simplyduetothefactthatamajorityof
thesepeoplewereprobablynothomeduringourvisits.

You know as well as I do that Greg doesnt have the time, or the staff, to do that in Fair Haven and I
cant even imagine what he will do if he has a similar no entry percentage in Howell Twp.
Thisiscertainlyachallengesincesometowns(includingHowell)areabout12xlargerthanFairHaven.Itis
importanttonotethatwhenanAssessorperformsanannualreassessment,itislargelybased(asyouknow)on
salesinformationandVCScodes,ratherthanextrapolatinginspectiondatafromthatyears20%totheentire
town.Inspectingthe20%annually(100%over5years)isthestaterequirementundertheADPwhichenables
annualrevaluationstobeperformed,andinsomeyearsitispossiblethatthe20%inspectiondatawillnotbe
submittedpriortothesubmissionofanassessmentbooktothecounty(FairHavenswasdonepriortothat
datein2014,andwealsodidtheAddedinspectionsbasedonpermits).

More important than the money we are paying for this rate of interior inspections is the fact that this
Assessment Demonstration Program is being piloted in Monmouth County, so these numbers will surely
be scrutinized by many individuals and interests, which should make this rate troubling to all concerned.

Pleaseseemynotesaboveastheyrelatetoinspectionratesvisavisrelativepricing.

117

If our numbers are indicative of a County wide trend, then, at the very least for this first year, I see it as a
potential public relations problem for the municipalities, the Monmouth County Board of Taxation and
RDS. If the trend continues, I think it could serve to undermine the program on a statewide basis.
Asmentionedabove,Ibelievethereisastrongcasethattownsareinspectingasmany,ormore,interiorsover
thesametimeframeastraditionalrevaluations,andaredoingsoatasignificantlylowerprice.Additionally,
whenwetakeintoaccountthelikelydecreaseinappealsduetothemorefrequentreassessmentsand
inspections(andtheavoidanceofcorrespondingbudgetshortfallsand/oremergencybondingwhichresult),and
themoretimelycaptureofAddedvaluesforworkwhichwasnotperformedviaarequiredpermit,thecosts
savingsfromtheADPwilllikelybesignificant,asMoodyshasnoted.

I have prepped this bill for payment at our 09/22 public meeting and I fully expect it to be called into question
by my own Governing Body. My public response will be that RDS has met the terms of the contract that we
entered into, which will clearly not serve to be an adequate defense of this new program, regardless of the fact
that I think it has merit. For everyones sake, I hope that the results we have seen in Fair Haven were just an
anomaly for 2014 and they will be improved upon in 2015. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, feel
free to give me a call. Best regards, Theresa

ThankyouforsubmittingourJulyInvoicefor9/22,andpleasefeelfreetoprovideanyfurtherinput,whichwe
appreciate.Havinganopendialoguecanonlybenefitourprojectaswemoveahead,andIhopemycommentshave
providesomeusefulthoughts.

Regards,Mike

118

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, August 19, 2014 1:47 PM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
RE: New Data

Mike

Firstandforemost,pleaseacceptmyapologiesfortheissues.

AsyouknowFreeholdTwpwasthefirstmunicipalitytobeinspectedusingthenewapplication,dataloadprocess,
etc.Thefirstrunplayedaroleinsomeoftheissues(i.e.detacheditems)becauseitappearssomeofthedatadidnt
populatecorrectlyinthetabletand/orbacktoyourMicroSystemsaccess.Theheattypewasinspectorerror,butweare
addingapopupalerttoconfirmthepropertyrequiresasecondheattype.The2Svs1Sadditionappearstobe
inspectorerroritaddedtotheexistingimprovementratherthandrawingthenewadditionas1s.Lastly,thereseems
tobeamissingdigitwithrespecttotheEND/ROWunitfieldinthedatapush(whichwillbecorrectedASAP).

Thereisareviewprocessinplacewithchangedfieldreporting,sketchreview,andQAviarandomspotchecking,but
someoftheissuesarerelatedtosharingthedataandsubsequentloadingintoMicrosystems.

WithrespecttoaREFUSAL,RDSismarkingthedataassuchandasyoustated,thedeterminationand/orchangeofdata
isuptotheassessor.RDSisnotchangingdatabasedonaREFUSAL.

Iunderstandyourfrustrationwiththeseissues,butpleaseknowthatthisprocessisbeingenhancedeverystepofthe
waytoprovideyou(andentireassessmentcommunity)thedataandtoolssoyouareabletofocusonvaluation,
appraisal,andotheraspectsofyourprofessionandthedemonstrationprogram.Weareworkingdiligentlytoperfect
thedatacollectionfunction,andalwayswelcomeyourfeedback.

Althoughthiswasyourpain,Ican'tthankyouenoughforyourdiligenceandattentiontoyourcraft.Yourprecisionhas
affordedustorectifyadataloadissuewithMicroSystemssotherewillbelessissuesforotherassessors.

Again,Iapologizefortheinconvenience,andsincerelythankyouforyourefforts.

Iamofcourseavailableatyourconveniencetodiscussyourconcerns,thoughts,andsuggestions.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


119

Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 11:25 AM
To: Daniel M. Kelly; nrubenstein@rdsnj.com
Cc: mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: New Data

Neil,

Perourconversationseeattached.Dan,IcalledNeilearlierbecauseIamfindingquiteafewerrorswiththe
inspections.Ihadastackoffiles,roughly40propertiesthathadpermitstakenoutforvariousworkthatwaspartofthe
20%inspectionprocess.MyofficehadgonetoallofthemalreadyandwecostedthemoutinourofficialfilebutIdid
notupdatetheaddedassessmentyetbecauseIdidntwantthefiletobeoverwritten(whichwouldnthavehappened
anyway).AsIwasgoingthroughandcomparingmyaddedstotheRDSinspectionsIfoundquiteafewerrorsforhow
littlepropertiesIreviewed.Therecordcardsareattachedaswellassomephotos.Someofthesehavealreadybeen
correctedintheRevalfile,justincaseyouhappentocheckit.

Block85.33Lot10theheatwasinputtedtwice
Block85.41Lot2therewasanadditiononthebackofthehouse,RDShas2storyaddition,myofficehas1story
additionwithpatio;Ifieldcheckedittodayanditsa1storyadditionwithapatio
Block85.46Lot6shedmissed
Block85.48Lot14shedmissed
Block85.51Lot15poolsizeincorrect,listedas192SF
Block86.10Lot1.52s03endunit,endunitremovedbyRDS
Block86.13Lot1.117s03endunit,endunitremovedbyRDS
Block86.23Lot24.166s06endunit,endunitremovedbyRDS

Iunderstandthisisanewprocessanditisgoingtotaketime,butthisisjustmypersonalopinion,Ifeelthetabletsarea
disadvantage,notanadvantage.Whenpaperwasused,someonewasinputtingthedataanditwashandwrittensoit
wasmucheasiertopickuponamistake.Withthetablets,howarethesebeingchecked?Istheresomeonereviewing
theworkthatwasdonebytheinspectorbecauseitshardformetobelievethatisthecase.Ifound8errorsinabout40
cards.

Also,Iwasundertheimpressionthatiftherewasarefusaltherewasgoingtobeanestimate.Thisdoesnotseemtobe
thecase.Iwastoldrefusalswouldbeestimated,andestimateswouldbeleftuptometodecidewhatIwantedtodo.

Sincerely,

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 431-0449 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 9:17 AM
To: Imbriaco, Michael; assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
120

; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;

Cc: mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; George Lockwood; Bill@MicroSystems-nj.com; Mike; support@rdsnj.com; 'Neil


Rubenstein'
Subject: RE: New Data

All

ThanksforpointingoutMike,andIapologizefornothavingexplainedthistoeachassessorwithcompleted2014data
collection.

WecouldnotexpandtheNOTESfieldoraddanotherlinetothecurrentlayoutinMicroSystems;theonlyoptionisto
overwriteexistingnotesthatmayexistonthePRC(displayedornot).Currently,assessorsusedifferentNOTESlinesfor
variousreasonsand/orinformationimportanttohe/she(i.e.
)makingitnearlyimpossible
toprogrammaticallyautomateinafileupload.

ThedeterminationofcriticalvsnoncriticalNOTEScouldnotbemadebyRDS,andtheriskofremoving(viaoverwrite)
assessor'sinformationistoogreat.Weknow(firsthand)theimportanceoftheNOTESfields,andthereforewedidnot
pushtheminthefileresultinginyourcurrentview.Withthatthedatawascollectedwhenaccessible/possible,andas
aninterimsolutionwillbeprovided(comingdays)inaspreadsheet(byBLQ).

TheNOTES(kitcheninformationandother)hasbeenaddressedinournextrelease.MicroSystemshasbeenveryhelpful
inthisrespect,andisreviewingNOTESfield9tolearnofitscommonusethroughouttheMonmouthCountyassessment
community.Dependingonwhatwelearn,RDSmayutilizeitasaplaceholderforkitcheninformationandother
information(ifso,thiswillbecommunicatedtoallassessors).Also,ourinspectorswillbeabletoviewthenotes(

andaddnotestocurrentlyusedlineswithoutremoving/alteringtheassessor'sown
notes.

Asweprogress,thisisoneoftheitems/desireddeliverablesthatwewouldliketodiscusswiththeassessment
community.Welookforwardtocontinuinganopendialogueasvendorsandmunicipalitiesworktogetherinthe
successofthedemonstrationprogram.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:44 PM
To: George Lockwood; assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftga
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
121

; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;

Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee


Subject: RE: New Data

Ivenoticedthatthenotesfielddidnotcopyoverfromtheofficialfolder,noristhereanythinginthenotesfieldsuchas
thekitchenbreakdown.Isthereanothersteptobedonethatwillcopyoverthenotesfieldandalso,Imgatheringthe
kitchendatawascollected.

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 431-0449 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: George Lockwood [mailto:george@microsystems-nj.com]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:46 AM
To: assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal
; Imbriaco, Michael; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee
Subject: New Data
Good Morning,
The records from the RDS 20% inspections are now available for you. In your CAMA menu, you should now have a
reval option, which is a copy of your official file with the newly inspected records merged into it. These records have
been encoded with 2014 in the AA Months field.
Please call or email us with any questions that you might have.
George Lockwood
MicroSystems-NJ.com
908-704-8862
george@microsystems-nj.com

122

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, August 19, 2014 1:47 PM
'Imbriaco, Michael'
mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; 'DK RDS'; 'Brandon Sherwood'; 'Neil Rubenstein'
RE: New Data

Mike

Firstandforemost,pleaseacceptmyapologiesfortheissues.

AsyouknowFreeholdTwpwasthefirstmunicipalitytobeinspectedusingthenewapplication,dataloadprocess,
etc.Thefirstrunplayedaroleinsomeoftheissues(i.e.detacheditems)becauseitappearssomeofthedatadidnt
populatecorrectlyinthetabletand/orbacktoyourMicroSystemsaccess.Theheattypewasinspectorerror,butweare
addingapopupalerttoconfirmthepropertyrequiresasecondheattype.The2Svs1Sadditionappearstobe
inspectorerroritaddedtotheexistingimprovementratherthandrawingthenewadditionas1s.Lastly,thereseems
tobeamissingdigitwithrespecttotheEND/ROWunitfieldinthedatapush(whichwillbecorrectedASAP).

Thereisareviewprocessinplacewithchangedfieldreporting,sketchreview,andQAviarandomspotchecking,but
someoftheissuesarerelatedtosharingthedataandsubsequentloadingintoMicrosystems.

WithrespecttoaREFUSAL,RDSismarkingthedataassuchandasyoustated,thedeterminationand/orchangeofdata
isuptotheassessor.RDSisnotchangingdatabasedonaREFUSAL.

Iunderstandyourfrustrationwiththeseissues,butpleaseknowthatthisprocessisbeingenhancedeverystepofthe
waytoprovideyou(andentireassessmentcommunity)thedataandtoolssoyouareabletofocusonvaluation,
appraisal,andotheraspectsofyourprofessionandthedemonstrationprogram.Weareworkingdiligentlytoperfect
thedatacollectionfunction,andalwayswelcomeyourfeedback.

Althoughthiswasyourpain,Ican'tthankyouenoughforyourdiligenceandattentiontoyourcraft.Yourprecisionhas
affordedustorectifyadataloadissuewithMicroSystemssotherewillbelessissuesforotherassessors.

Again,Iapologizefortheinconvenience,andsincerelythankyouforyourefforts.

Iamofcourseavailableatyourconveniencetodiscussyourconcerns,thoughts,andsuggestions.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


123

Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 11:25 AM
To: Daniel M. Kelly; nrubenstein@rdsnj.com
Cc: mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us
Subject: RE: New Data

Neil,

Perourconversationseeattached.Dan,IcalledNeilearlierbecauseIamfindingquiteafewerrorswiththe
inspections.Ihadastackoffiles,roughly40propertiesthathadpermitstakenoutforvariousworkthatwaspartofthe
20%inspectionprocess.MyofficehadgonetoallofthemalreadyandwecostedthemoutinourofficialfilebutIdid
notupdatetheaddedassessmentyetbecauseIdidntwantthefiletobeoverwritten(whichwouldnthavehappened
anyway).AsIwasgoingthroughandcomparingmyaddedstotheRDSinspectionsIfoundquiteafewerrorsforhow
littlepropertiesIreviewed.Therecordcardsareattachedaswellassomephotos.Someofthesehavealreadybeen
correctedintheRevalfile,justincaseyouhappentocheckit.

Block85.33Lot10theheatwasinputtedtwice
Block85.41Lot2therewasanadditiononthebackofthehouse,RDShas2storyaddition,myofficehas1story
additionwithpatio;Ifieldcheckedittodayanditsa1storyadditionwithapatio
Block85.46Lot6shedmissed
Block85.48Lot14shedmissed
Block85.51Lot15poolsizeincorrect,listedas192SF
Block86.10Lot1.52s03endunit,endunitremovedbyRDS
Block86.13Lot1.117s03endunit,endunitremovedbyRDS
Block86.23Lot24.166s06endunit,endunitremovedbyRDS

Iunderstandthisisanewprocessanditisgoingtotaketime,butthisisjustmypersonalopinion,Ifeelthetabletsarea
disadvantage,notanadvantage.Whenpaperwasused,someonewasinputtingthedataanditwashandwrittensoit
wasmucheasiertopickuponamistake.Withthetablets,howarethesebeingchecked?Istheresomeonereviewing
theworkthatwasdonebytheinspectorbecauseitshardformetobelievethatisthecase.Ifound8errorsinabout40
cards.

Also,Iwasundertheimpressionthatiftherewasarefusaltherewasgoingtobeanestimate.Thisdoesnotseemtobe
thecase.Iwastoldrefusalswouldbeestimated,andestimateswouldbeleftuptometodecidewhatIwantedtodo.

Sincerely,

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 431-0449 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: Daniel M. Kelly [mailto:dkelly@rdsnj.com]


Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 9:17 AM
To: Imbriaco, Michael; assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
124

; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;

Cc: mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; George Lockwood; Bill@MicroSystems-nj.com; Mike; support@rdsnj.com; 'Neil


Rubenstein'
Subject: RE: New Data

All

ThanksforpointingoutMike,andIapologizefornothavingexplainedthistoeachassessorwithcompleted2014data
collection.

WecouldnotexpandtheNOTESfieldoraddanotherlinetothecurrentlayoutinMicroSystems;theonlyoptionisto
overwriteexistingnotesthatmayexistonthePRC(displayedornot).Currently,assessorsusedifferentNOTESlinesfor
variousreasonsand/orinformationimportanttohe/she(i.e.
)makingitnearlyimpossible
toprogrammaticallyautomateinafileupload.

ThedeterminationofcriticalvsnoncriticalNOTEScouldnotbemadebyRDS,andtheriskofremoving(viaoverwrite)
assessor'sinformationistoogreat.Weknow(firsthand)theimportanceoftheNOTESfields,andthereforewedidnot
pushtheminthefileresultinginyourcurrentview.Withthatthedatawascollectedwhenaccessible/possible,andas
aninterimsolutionwillbeprovided(comingdays)inaspreadsheet(byBLQ).

TheNOTES(kitcheninformationandother)hasbeenaddressedinournextrelease.MicroSystemshasbeenveryhelpful
inthisrespect,andisreviewingNOTESfield9tolearnofitscommonusethroughouttheMonmouthCountyassessment
community.Dependingonwhatwelearn,RDSmayutilizeitasaplaceholderforkitcheninformationandother
information(ifso,thiswillbecommunicatedtoallassessors).Also,ourinspectorswillbeabletoviewthenotes(

andaddnotestocurrentlyusedlineswithoutremoving/alteringtheassessor'sown
notes.

Asweprogress,thisisoneoftheitems/desireddeliverablesthatwewouldliketodiscusswiththeassessment
community.Welookforwardtocontinuinganopendialogueasvendorsandmunicipalitiesworktogetherinthe
successofthedemonstrationprogram.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:44 PM
To: George Lockwood; assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftga
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
125

; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;

Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee


Subject: RE: New Data

Ivenoticedthatthenotesfielddidnotcopyoverfromtheofficialfolder,noristhereanythinginthenotesfieldsuchas
thekitchenbreakdown.Isthereanothersteptobedonethatwillcopyoverthenotesfieldandalso,Imgatheringthe
kitchendatawascollected.

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 431-0449 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: George Lockwood [mailto:george@microsystems-nj.com]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:46 AM
To: assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal
; Imbriaco, Michael; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee
Subject: New Data
Good Morning,
The records from the RDS 20% inspections are now available for you. In your CAMA menu, you should now have a
reval option, which is a copy of your official file with the newly inspected records merged into it. These records have
been encoded with 2014 in the AA Months field.
Please call or email us with any questions that you might have.
George Lockwood
MicroSystems-NJ.com
908-704-8862
george@microsystems-nj.com

126

Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:44 PM
To: George Lockwood; assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal@comcast.net; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44@gmail.com
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee
Subject: RE: New Data

Ivenoticedthatthenotesfielddidnotcopyoverfromtheofficialfolder,noristhereanythinginthenotesfieldsuchas
thekitchenbreakdown.Isthereanothersteptobedonethatwillcopyoverthenotesfieldandalso,Imgatheringthe
kitchendatawascollected.

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 431-0449 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: George Lockwood [mailto:george@microsystems-nj.com]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:46 AM
To: assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal
; Imbriaco, Michael; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee
Subject: New Data
Good Morning,
The records from the RDS 20% inspections are now available for you. In your CAMA menu, you should now have a
reval option, which is a copy of your official file with the newly inspected records merged into it. These records have
been encoded with 2014 in the AA Months field.
Please call or email us with any questions that you might have.
George Lockwood
MicroSystems-NJ.com
908-704-8862
george@microsystems-nj.com

128

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, August 19, 2014 9:17 AM
'Imbriaco, Michael'; assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftga
; 'Delre,
Michael'; cnplanners@optonline.net; vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44

Cc:

mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; George Lockwood; Bill@MicroSystems-nj.com; Mike;


support@rdsnj.com; 'Neil Rubenstein'
RE: New Data

Subject:

All

ThanksforpointingoutMike,andIapologizefornothavingexplainedthistoeachassessorwithcompleted2014data
collection.

WecouldnotexpandtheNOTESfieldoraddanotherlinetothecurrentlayoutinMicroSystems;theonlyoptionisto
overwriteexistingnotesthatmayexistonthePRC(displayedornot).Currently,assessorsusedifferentNOTESlinesfor
variousreasonsand/orinformationimportanttohe/she(i.e.
makingitnearlyimpossible
toprogrammaticallyautomateinafileupload.

ThedeterminationofcriticalvsnoncriticalNOTEScouldnotbemadebyRDS,andtheriskofremoving(viaoverwrite)
assessor'sinformationistoogreat.Weknow(firsthand)theimportanceoftheNOTESfields,andthereforewedidnot
pushtheminthefileresultinginyourcurrentview.Withthatthedatawascollectedwhenaccessible/possible,andas
aninterimsolutionwillbeprovided(comingdays)inaspreadsheet(byBLQ).

TheNOTES(kitcheninformationandother)hasbeenaddressedinournextrelease.MicroSystemshasbeenveryhelpful
inthisrespect,andisreviewingNOTESfield9tolearnofitscommonusethroughouttheMonmouthCountyassessment
community.Dependingonwhatwelearn,RDSmayutilizeitasaplaceholderforkitcheninformationandother
information(ifso,thiswillbecommunicatedtoallassessors).Also,ourinspectorswillbeabletoviewthenotes

andaddnotestocurrentlyusedlineswithoutremoving/alteringtheassessor'sown
notes.

Asweprogress,thisisoneoftheitems/desireddeliverablesthatwewouldliketodiscusswiththeassessment
community.Welookforwardtocontinuinganopendialogueasvendorsandmunicipalitiesworktogetherinthe
successofthedemonstrationprogram.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


129

Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

From: Imbriaco, Michael [mailto:MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:44 PM
To: George Lockwood; assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal
; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee
Subject: RE: New Data

Ivenoticedthatthenotesfielddidnotcopyoverfromtheofficialfolder,noristhereanythinginthenotesfieldsuchas
thekitchenbreakdown.Isthereanothersteptobedonethatwillcopyoverthenotesfieldandalso,Imgatheringthe
kitchendatawascollected.

Mike Imbriaco, CTA


Assessor
Freehold Township
(732) 294-2041 (P)
(732) 431-0449 (F)
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us

From: George Lockwood [mailto:george@microsystems-nj.com]


Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:46 AM
To: assessor@englishtownnj.com; djtuftgal
; Imbriaco, Michael; Delre, Michael; cnplanners@optonline.net;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; pbarnett44
Cc: dkelly@rdsnj.com; mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us; Bill Raska; Mike Chin; Trevor McGhee
Subject: New Data
Good Morning,
The records from the RDS 20% inspections are now available for you. In your CAMA menu, you should now have a
reval option, which is a copy of your official file with the newly inspected records merged into it. These records have
been encoded with 2014 in the AA Months field.
Please call or email us with any questions that you might have.
George Lockwood
MicroSystems-NJ.com
908-704-8862
george@microsystems-nj.com

130

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:22 PM
check@middletownnj.org
Clark, Matt; 'DK RDS'
Demonstration Program Data - Middletown

Charlie

Ourfirmhascompletedaportion(Middletownblock/lotsprovidedbyyouroffice)ofthe2014datacollectionproject
undertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems
(MS).YourofficewillbecopiedonourcommunicationtoMS,whichwillmakethepropertyrecordsavailableforyour
review.Oncetheirworkiscomplete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubject
tothisyearsinspections(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthis
period).Asmentionedpreviously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbe
completedasseparateprojects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

PleasenotethattheremainingMiddletownpropertydatawillbecollectedthroughouttheremainderoftheyear,and
thissameprocesswilltakeplace.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

131

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:22 PM
check@middletownnj.org
'Clark, Matt'; 'DK RDS'
Demonstration Program Data - Middletown

Charlie

Ourfirmhascompletedaportion(Middletownblock/lotsprovidedbyyouroffice)ofthe2014datacollectionproject
undertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems
(MS).YourofficewillbecopiedonourcommunicationtoMS,whichwillmakethepropertyrecordsavailableforyour
review.Oncetheirworkiscomplete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubject
tothisyearsinspections(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthis
period).Asmentionedpreviously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbe
completedasseparateprojects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

PleasenotethattheremainingMiddletownpropertydatawillbecollectedthroughouttheremainderoftheyear,and
thissameprocesswilltakeplace.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

132

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, July 29, 2014 3:29 PM
ghutch5577
Clark, Matt; support@rdsnj.com
Demonstration Program Data - Fair Haven

Greg

Ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,
andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewillbecopiedonour
communicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Oncetheirworkis
complete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyearsinspections
(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).Asmentioned
previously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedasseparate
projects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

133

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, July 29, 2014 3:29 PM
ghutch5577
'Clark, Matt'; support@rdsnj.com
Demonstration Program Data - Fair Haven

Greg

Ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,
andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewillbecopiedonour
communicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Oncetheirworkis
complete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyearsinspections
(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).Asmentioned
previously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedasseparate
projects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

134

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, July 23, 2014 11:41 AM
mimbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us; mdelre@twp.freehold.nj.us
'Clark, Matt'; support@rdsnj.com
Demonstration Program Data - Freehold Twp

Mike/Mike

Ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,
andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewillbecopiedonour
communicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Oncetheirworkis
complete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyearsinspections
(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).Asmentioned
previously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedasseparate
projects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

135

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:45 PM
pbarnett44
'Clark, Matt'; support@rdsnj.com
Demonstration Program Data - Deal

Peter

Ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,
andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewillbecopiedonour
communicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Oncetheirworkis
complete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyearsinspections
(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).Asmentioned
previously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedasseparate
projects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

136

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Monday, July 21, 2014 3:33 PM
cnplanners@optonline.net
support@rdsnj.com; 'Clark, Matt'
Avon - 20% Demonstration Program

Tim

Ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,
andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewillbecopiedonour
communicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Oncetheirworkis
complete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyearsinspections
(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).Asmentioned
previously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedasseparate
projects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

137

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Friday, July 18, 2014 8:35 AM
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com
support@rdsnj.com; 'Clark, Matt'
Demonstration Program Data

Victoria

Ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,
andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewillbecopiedonour
communicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Oncetheirworkis
complete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyearsinspections
(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).Asmentioned
previously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedasseparate
projects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

138

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, July 16, 2014 3:35 PM
djtuftga
support@rdsnj.com; 'Clark, Matt'
Demonstration Program Data

Donna

Ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram,
andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewillbecopiedonour
communicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Oncetheirworkis
complete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyearsinspections
(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).Asmentioned
previously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedasseparate
projects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

139

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Wednesday, July 16, 2014 3:07 PM
assessor@englishtownnj.com
support@rdsnj.com; 'Clark, Matt'
Demonstration Program Data

Mark

Aswevediscussed,ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessment
DemonstrationProgram,andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewill
becopiedonourcommunicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Once
theirworkiscomplete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyears
inspections(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).As
mentionedpreviously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedas
separateprojects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

140

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Daniel M. Kelly <dkelly@rdsnj.com>


Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:12 PM
aworth@mtnj.org
support@rdsnj.com; 'Clark, Matt'
Demonstration Program Data

Alex

Aswevediscussed,ourfirmhascompletedthe2014portionofthedatacollectionprojectundertheAssessment
DemonstrationProgram,andwillbetransmittingtheresultsofourinspectionstoMicrosystems(MS).Yourofficewill
becopiedonourcommunicationtoMS,whichwillmakechangestopropertyrecordsavailableforyourreview.Once
theirworkiscomplete,theblackoutperiodwillconcludewithrespecttothe20%ofpropertiessubjecttothisyears
inspections(afterwhichyoucanenteranychangesinCAMAwhichyoumayhavegatheredduringthisperiod).As
mentionedpreviously,Addedandfarmland(3B)inspections(asapplicabletoyourmunicipality)willbecompletedas
separateprojects,eachwithasimilarprocedureandblackoutperiodforthoseproperties.

Ifyoushouldhaveanyquestions,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DK

DanielM.Kelly,CTA

55 White Road, Unit C


Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Office:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email:
Wesbite:

(732) 276-1057 Ext 103


(732)
(732) 276-1056
dkelly@rdsnj.com
www.RDSnj.com

141

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Clark, Matt
Friday, March 14, 2014 2:21 PM
'Gregory Hutchinson'; skineavy@aberdeennj.org; pbarnett44
;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; Erick.Aguiar@cityofasburypark.com;
emagnani@holmdeltownship-nj.com; cnplanners@optonline.net;
emullane@oceantwp.org; Assessor@tintonfalls.com; jgillooly@irr.com;
aworth@mtnj.org; ahcessr
; gibbsboroassessor
;
Asstx@AOL.com; wfitzpatrick@townshipofwall.com; gscaglione@hazlettwp.org;
check@middletownnj.org; jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us; spezar@twp.brick.nj.us;
rfrotton@marlboro-nj.gov; taxassessor@manasquan-nj.com;
MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us; taxassessor@twp.berkeley.nj.us; ppatom@comcast.net;
bhaney@neptunetownship.org; benright@springlakeboro.org; djtuftga
;
emullane@oceantwp.org; benright@oldbridge.com; george@microsystems-nj.com;
Lacey.taxassessor@laceytownship.org; clauver@middletownnj.org;
byrnet
; dcrozier@neptunetownship.org; tomre
;
joann.huza@aberdeennj.org; dankelly1
; wlaird@ci.long-branch.nj.us;
emarchetti@holmdeltownship-nj.com; taxa@eatontownnj.com; Erin Serfass;
kpeel@townshipofwall.com; dcpnj@comcast.net; taxcompomanowsk
;
aworth@oceantwp.org; joerahman
; jcasagrande@townshipofwall.com;
Schenk, Veronica
Rapidly Evolving Issues A-2495 Extend Gloucester to Atlantic.pdf; A-2621 County Assessing - Gloucester
expanded.pdf; S1801 County Assessing Expansion Draft.docx

DearAssessors:

TheissueofCountyAssessingisbackinfrontoftheLegislature.
A2495(Mazzeo)specificallyasksforCountyAssessingforAtlanticCounty.
A2621andS1801arethesame.TheyarelookingtopermitanyCountytostartCountyAssessing.ThisbillisintheSenate
CommitteethisMonday.UsingthepointsoutlinedbelowIwilltestifyagainstthebillonbehalfoftheNewJersey
AssociationofCountyTaxBoardsandtheMonmouthCountyBoardofTaxation.Ihaveattachedacopyofthebillsas
wellasadraftforyouruseintheeventyouneedtocommentonS180.

SummaryofS180:

MakestheGloucesterCountyPilotP.L.2009Ch118(AKACountyAssessing)available(permissive)toany
countyinNewJersey.
Permitstheabilitytochangetheappealcalendar.
Thebillrequiresthecountyto(initially)paythecostsassociatedwiththemunicipalrevaluations.
ThebillrequirestheStatetoreimbursethecountyforthecostoftherevaluationsattheendofthethree
yearperiodduringwhichthemunicipalitiesmustconducttherevaluationswithmoniesfromtheSHARE
programortheConsolidationFund.
Thebillexemptsmoniespaidformunicipalrevaluationsandthecountysadministrativestartupcosts
fromthecapsonincreasesinthecountytaxlevy.

TheNewJerseyAssociationofCountyTaxBoardsNJACTBrespectfullyobjectstotheproposedlegislationbasedonthe
followingpoints:
142

1.

2.

ThebillmakestheGloucesterCountyPilotP.L.2009Ch118(AKACountyAssessing)availabletoany
countyinNewJersey.

Withaclearunderstandingthatthecurrentpropertytaxsystemmustbeimprovedupon,the
Legislaturecarefullycraftedtwoopposingmodelsoftheassessmentfunctiontobetested.Namely,
theyaretheGloucesterPILOTandtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram.Beforeanotherpennyof
fundscollectedstatewideisspentforthebenefitofanyindividualcounty,thetwomodelsMUSTbe
allowedtobetestedfullyandthenforensicallyreviewedandcompared.Onoraboutthesixthyearof
implementationbothprogramsarerequiredtosubmitreportstotheGovernorandtheLegislatureso
thatitcanbedeterminedwhichdirection,ifeither,isinthebestlongterminterestofthetaxpayers.
Onlythenwillwehaveperformedtheappropriateduediligencetosupportastatewidechangetothe
assessmentfunction.

Thebillrequiresthecountytopaythecostsassociatedwiththemunicipalrevaluations.

Thismeansthatthecostofimplementationandmaintenancewillbeapportionedthroughoutthe
CountybasedoneachtownsEqualizedValue.Theresultofthisformofcostapportionmentisthata
smallbutaffluenttownwilltypicallyseeasignificantincreaseincostassociatedwiththeAssessment
function.Whilethisfundingmechanismwillproviderelieftosome,itwillcauseanincreasedburden
forothersthroughanINCREASEinpropertytaxes.Thisincreasedholdingcostonthemostaffluent
mayacceleratetheexodusofthewealthyandpermanentlyreducetheuppertierofpropertyvalues.

3.

ThebillrequirestheStatetoreimbursethecountyforthecostoftherevaluationsattheendofthe
threeyearperiodduringwhichthemunicipalitiesmustconducttherevaluationswithmoniesfrom
theSHAREprogramortheConsolidationFund.

Thismeansthatmoneycollectedstatewidewillbeusedtopayfortherevaluationsperformedin
participatingcounties.Countiesandtownsthathavealreadyincurredthecostofremainingcurrentin
theirassessmentsshouldnothavetounderwritetheneglectofothers.

Thepermissivenotmandatoryargumentdoesnotmakethisprogramacceptablestatewide.By
makingtheprogrampermissiveyouareprovidingaccesstomoneycollectedstatewide.One
programisalreadybeingtestedandpaidforbystatewidefunds,anothersimilarprogramisnot
neededatthistime.Useofsuchpreciouspooledmoneypriortofullyunderstandingtheimpactofthe
centralizedmodelisirresponsibleatthisjuncture.

4.

Thebillexemptsmoniespaidformunicipalrevaluationsandthecountysadministrativestartupcosts
fromthecapsonincreasesinthecountytaxlevy.

LevyCapexceptionwasnotpermittedwithintheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram.Inthespiritof
creatingalevelplayingfieldbetweentwocompetingmodels,theLevyCapexceptionshouldnotbe
available.

Regards,
MatthewClark,MonmouthCountyTaxAdministrator

143

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Clark, Matt
Friday, March 14, 2014 2:21 PM
'Gregory Hutchinson'; skineavy@aberdeennj.org; pbarnett44
;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; Erick.Aguiar@cityofasburypark.com;
emagnani@holmdeltownship-nj.com; cnplanners@optonline.net;
emullane@oceantwp.org; Assessor@tintonfalls.com; jgillooly@irr.com;
aworth@mtnj.org; ahcessr
; gibbsboroassessor
;
Asstx@AOL.com; wfitzpatrick@townshipofwall.com; gscaglione@hazlettwp.org;
check@middletownnj.org; jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us; spezar@twp.brick.nj.us;
rfrotton@marlboro-nj.gov; taxassessor@manasquan-nj.com;
MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us; taxassessor@twp.berkeley.nj.us; ppatom@comcast.net;
bhaney@neptunetownship.org; benright@springlakeboro.org; djtuftga
;
emullane@oceantwp.org; benright@oldbridge.com; george@microsystems-nj.com;
Lacey.taxassessor@laceytownship.org; clauver@middletownnj.org;
byrnet
; dcrozier@neptunetownship.org; tomre
;
joann.huza@aberdeennj.org; dankelly1
; wlaird@ci.long-branch.nj.us;
emarchetti@holmdeltownship-nj.com; taxa@eatontownnj.com; Erin Serfass;
kpeel@townshipofwall.com; dcpnj@comcast.net; taxcompomanowsk
;
aworth@oceantwp.org; joerahman
; jcasagrande@townshipofwall.com;
Schenk, Veronica
Rapidly Evolving Issues A-2495 Extend Gloucester to Atlantic.pdf; A-2621 County Assessing - Gloucester
expanded.pdf; S1801 County Assessing Expansion Draft.docx

DearAssessors:

TheissueofCountyAssessingisbackinfrontoftheLegislature.
A2495(Mazzeo)specificallyasksforCountyAssessingforAtlanticCounty.
A2621andS1801arethesame.TheyarelookingtopermitanyCountytostartCountyAssessing.ThisbillisintheSenate
CommitteethisMonday.UsingthepointsoutlinedbelowIwilltestifyagainstthebillonbehalfoftheNewJersey
AssociationofCountyTaxBoardsandtheMonmouthCountyBoardofTaxation.Ihaveattachedacopyofthebillsas
wellasadraftforyouruseintheeventyouneedtocommentonS180.

SummaryofS180:

MakestheGloucesterCountyPilotP.L.2009Ch118(AKACountyAssessing)available(permissive)toany
countyinNewJersey.
Permitstheabilitytochangetheappealcalendar.
Thebillrequiresthecountyto(initially)paythecostsassociatedwiththemunicipalrevaluations.
ThebillrequirestheStatetoreimbursethecountyforthecostoftherevaluationsattheendofthethree
yearperiodduringwhichthemunicipalitiesmustconducttherevaluationswithmoniesfromtheSHARE
programortheConsolidationFund.
Thebillexemptsmoniespaidformunicipalrevaluationsandthecountysadministrativestartupcosts
fromthecapsonincreasesinthecountytaxlevy.

TheNewJerseyAssociationofCountyTaxBoardsNJACTBrespectfullyobjectstotheproposedlegislationbasedonthe
followingpoints:
144

1.

2.

ThebillmakestheGloucesterCountyPilotP.L.2009Ch118(AKACountyAssessing)availabletoany
countyinNewJersey.

Withaclearunderstandingthatthecurrentpropertytaxsystemmustbeimprovedupon,the
Legislaturecarefullycraftedtwoopposingmodelsoftheassessmentfunctiontobetested.Namely,
theyaretheGloucesterPILOTandtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram.Beforeanotherpennyof
fundscollectedstatewideisspentforthebenefitofanyindividualcounty,thetwomodelsMUSTbe
allowedtobetestedfullyandthenforensicallyreviewedandcompared.Onoraboutthesixthyearof
implementationbothprogramsarerequiredtosubmitreportstotheGovernorandtheLegislatureso
thatitcanbedeterminedwhichdirection,ifeither,isinthebestlongterminterestofthetaxpayers.
Onlythenwillwehaveperformedtheappropriateduediligencetosupportastatewidechangetothe
assessmentfunction.

Thebillrequiresthecountytopaythecostsassociatedwiththemunicipalrevaluations.

Thismeansthatthecostofimplementationandmaintenancewillbeapportionedthroughoutthe
CountybasedoneachtownsEqualizedValue.Theresultofthisformofcostapportionmentisthata
smallbutaffluenttownwilltypicallyseeasignificantincreaseincostassociatedwiththeAssessment
function.Whilethisfundingmechanismwillproviderelieftosome,itwillcauseanincreasedburden
forothersthroughanINCREASEinpropertytaxes.Thisincreasedholdingcostonthemostaffluent
mayacceleratetheexodusofthewealthyandpermanentlyreducetheuppertierofpropertyvalues.

3.

ThebillrequirestheStatetoreimbursethecountyforthecostoftherevaluationsattheendofthe
threeyearperiodduringwhichthemunicipalitiesmustconducttherevaluationswithmoniesfrom
theSHAREprogramortheConsolidationFund.

Thismeansthatmoneycollectedstatewidewillbeusedtopayfortherevaluationsperformedin
participatingcounties.Countiesandtownsthathavealreadyincurredthecostofremainingcurrentin
theirassessmentsshouldnothavetounderwritetheneglectofothers.

Thepermissivenotmandatoryargumentdoesnotmakethisprogramacceptablestatewide.By
makingtheprogrampermissiveyouareprovidingaccesstomoneycollectedstatewide.One
programisalreadybeingtestedandpaidforbystatewidefunds,anothersimilarprogramisnot
neededatthistime.Useofsuchpreciouspooledmoneypriortofullyunderstandingtheimpactofthe
centralizedmodelisirresponsibleatthisjuncture.

4.

Thebillexemptsmoniespaidformunicipalrevaluationsandthecountysadministrativestartupcosts
fromthecapsonincreasesinthecountytaxlevy.

LevyCapexceptionwasnotpermittedwithintheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram.Inthespiritof
creatingalevelplayingfieldbetweentwocompetingmodels,theLevyCapexceptionshouldnotbe
available.

Regards,
MatthewClark,MonmouthCountyTaxAdministrator

145

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Clark, Matt
Friday, March 14, 2014 2:21 PM
'Gregory Hutchinson'; skineavy@aberdeennj.org; pbarnett44
;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; Erick.Aguiar@cityofasburypark.com;
emagnani@holmdeltownship-nj.com; cnplanners@optonline.net;
emullane@oceantwp.org; Assessor@tintonfalls.com; jgillooly@irr.com;
aworth@mtnj.org; ahcessr
; gibbsboroassessor
;
Asstx@AOL.com; wfitzpatrick@townshipofwall.com; gscaglione@hazlettwp.org;
check@middletownnj.org; jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us; spezar@twp.brick.nj.us;
rfrotton@marlboro-nj.gov; taxassessor@manasquan-nj.com;
MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us; taxassessor@twp.berkeley.nj.us; ppatom@comcast.net;
bhaney@neptunetownship.org; benright@springlakeboro.org; djtuftga
;
emullane@oceantwp.org; benright@oldbridge.com; george@microsystems-nj.com;
Lacey.taxassessor@laceytownship.org; clauver@middletownnj.org;
byrnet
; dcrozier@neptunetownship.org; tomre
;
joann.huza@aberdeennj.org; dankelly1
; wlaird@ci.long-branch.nj.us;
emarchetti@holmdeltownship-nj.com; taxa@eatontownnj.com; Erin Serfass;
kpeel@townshipofwall.com; dcpnj
; taxcompomanowsk
;
aworth@oceantwp.org; joerahman
; jcasagrande@townshipofwall.com;
Schenk, Veronica
Rapidly Evolving Issues A-2495 Extend Gloucester to Atlantic.pdf; A-2621 County Assessing - Gloucester
expanded.pdf; S1801 County Assessing Expansion Draft.docx

DearAssessors:

TheissueofCountyAssessingisbackinfrontoftheLegislature.
A2495(Mazzeo)specificallyasksforCountyAssessingforAtlanticCounty.
A2621andS1801arethesame.TheyarelookingtopermitanyCountytostartCountyAssessing.ThisbillisintheSenate
CommitteethisMonday.UsingthepointsoutlinedbelowIwilltestifyagainstthebillonbehalfoftheNewJersey
AssociationofCountyTaxBoardsandtheMonmouthCountyBoardofTaxation.Ihaveattachedacopyofthebillsas
wellasadraftforyouruseintheeventyouneedtocommentonS180.

SummaryofS180:

MakestheGloucesterCountyPilotP.L.2009Ch118(AKACountyAssessing)available(permissive)toany
countyinNewJersey.
Permitstheabilitytochangetheappealcalendar.
Thebillrequiresthecountyto(initially)paythecostsassociatedwiththemunicipalrevaluations.
ThebillrequirestheStatetoreimbursethecountyforthecostoftherevaluationsattheendofthethree
yearperiodduringwhichthemunicipalitiesmustconducttherevaluationswithmoniesfromtheSHARE
programortheConsolidationFund.
Thebillexemptsmoniespaidformunicipalrevaluationsandthecountysadministrativestartupcosts
fromthecapsonincreasesinthecountytaxlevy.

TheNewJerseyAssociationofCountyTaxBoardsNJACTBrespectfullyobjectstotheproposedlegislationbasedonthe
followingpoints:
146

1.

2.

ThebillmakestheGloucesterCountyPilotP.L.2009Ch118(AKACountyAssessing)availabletoany
countyinNewJersey.

Withaclearunderstandingthatthecurrentpropertytaxsystemmustbeimprovedupon,the
Legislaturecarefullycraftedtwoopposingmodelsoftheassessmentfunctiontobetested.Namely,
theyaretheGloucesterPILOTandtheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram.Beforeanotherpennyof
fundscollectedstatewideisspentforthebenefitofanyindividualcounty,thetwomodelsMUSTbe
allowedtobetestedfullyandthenforensicallyreviewedandcompared.Onoraboutthesixthyearof
implementationbothprogramsarerequiredtosubmitreportstotheGovernorandtheLegislatureso
thatitcanbedeterminedwhichdirection,ifeither,isinthebestlongterminterestofthetaxpayers.
Onlythenwillwehaveperformedtheappropriateduediligencetosupportastatewidechangetothe
assessmentfunction.

Thebillrequiresthecountytopaythecostsassociatedwiththemunicipalrevaluations.

Thismeansthatthecostofimplementationandmaintenancewillbeapportionedthroughoutthe
CountybasedoneachtownsEqualizedValue.Theresultofthisformofcostapportionmentisthata
smallbutaffluenttownwilltypicallyseeasignificantincreaseincostassociatedwiththeAssessment
function.Whilethisfundingmechanismwillproviderelieftosome,itwillcauseanincreasedburden
forothersthroughanINCREASEinpropertytaxes.Thisincreasedholdingcostonthemostaffluent
mayacceleratetheexodusofthewealthyandpermanentlyreducetheuppertierofpropertyvalues.

3.

ThebillrequirestheStatetoreimbursethecountyforthecostoftherevaluationsattheendofthe
threeyearperiodduringwhichthemunicipalitiesmustconducttherevaluationswithmoniesfrom
theSHAREprogramortheConsolidationFund.

Thismeansthatmoneycollectedstatewidewillbeusedtopayfortherevaluationsperformedin
participatingcounties.Countiesandtownsthathavealreadyincurredthecostofremainingcurrentin
theirassessmentsshouldnothavetounderwritetheneglectofothers.

Thepermissivenotmandatoryargumentdoesnotmakethisprogramacceptablestatewide.By
makingtheprogrampermissiveyouareprovidingaccesstomoneycollectedstatewide.One
programisalreadybeingtestedandpaidforbystatewidefunds,anothersimilarprogramisnot
neededatthistime.Useofsuchpreciouspooledmoneypriortofullyunderstandingtheimpactofthe
centralizedmodelisirresponsibleatthisjuncture.

4.

Thebillexemptsmoniespaidformunicipalrevaluationsandthecountysadministrativestartupcosts
fromthecapsonincreasesinthecountytaxlevy.

LevyCapexceptionwasnotpermittedwithintheAssessmentDemonstrationProgram.Inthespiritof
creatingalevelplayingfieldbetweentwocompetingmodels,theLevyCapexceptionshouldnotbe
available.

Regards,
MatthewClark,MonmouthCountyTaxAdministrator

147

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Clark, Matt
Tuesday, January 28, 2014 3:20 PM
'Erick Aguiar'; skineavy@aberdeennj.org; pbarnett44
;
vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com; emagnani@holmdeltownship-nj.com;
cnplanners@optonline.net; emullane@oceantwp.org; Assessor@tintonfalls.com;
jgillooly@irr.com; aworth@interlakenboro.com; ahcessr
;
gibbsboroassessor
; Asstx@AOL.com; wfitzpatrick@townshipofwall.com;
gscaglione@hazlettwp.org; check@middletownnj.org; ghutchinson@twp.howell.nj.us;
jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us; spezar@twp.brick.nj.us; rfrotton@marlboro-nj.gov;
taxassessor@manasquan-nj.com; MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us;
taxassessor@twp.berkeley.nj.us; ppatom@comcast.net; bhaney@neptunetownship.org;
benright@springlakeboro.org; djtuftga
; emullane@oceantwp.org;
benright@oldbridge.com; george@microsystems-nj.com;
Lacey.taxassessor@laceytownship.org; clauver@middletownnj.org;
byrnet
; dcrozier@neptunetownship.org; tomre
;
joann.huza@aberdeennj.org; dankelly1
; wlaird@ci.long-branch.nj.us;
emarchetti@holmdeltownship-nj.com; taxa@eatontownnj.com;
eserfass@twp.howell.nj.us; kpeel@townshipofwall.com; dcpnj@comcast.net;
taxcompomanowsk
; joerahman
;
jcasagrande@townshipofwall.com; Schenk, Veronica; aworth@mtnj.org;
Holly.Reycraft@aberdeennj.org
RE: 8th Annual Monmouth Conference
Tax Appeal Hearing Schedule 2014 FINAL Public.pdf

Hello:
Attachedpleasefindthefinal/complete2014appealhearingschedulefortheMonmouthCountyBoardofTaxation.

Regards,
MatthewClark,TaxAdministrator

From: Erick Aguiar [mailto:erick.aguiar@cityofasburypark.com]


Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 10:58 AM
To: 'Erick Aguiar'; skineavy@aberdeennj.org; pbarnett44
; vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com;
emagnani@holmdeltownship-nj.com; cnplanners@optonline.net; emullane@oceantwp.org; Assessor@tintonfalls.com;
jgillooly@irr.com; aworth@interlakenboro.com; ahcessr
; gibbsboroassessor
; Asstx@AOL.com;
wfitzpatrick@townshipofwall.com; gscaglione@hazlettwp.org; check@middletownnj.org; ghutchinson@twp.howell.nj.us;
jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us; spezar@twp.brick.nj.us; rfrotton@marlboro-nj.gov; taxassessor@manasquan-nj.com;
MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us; taxassessor@twp.berkeley.nj.us; ppatom@comcast.net; bhaney@neptunetownship.org;
benright@springlakeboro.org; djtuftgal
; emullane@oceantwp.org; benright@oldbridge.com;
;
george@microsystems-nj.com; Lacey.taxassessor@laceytownship.org; clauver@middletownnj.org; byrnet
Clark, Matt; dcrozier@neptunetownship.org; tomre
; joann.huza@aberdeennj.org; dankelly1
;
wlaird@ci.long-branch.nj.us; emarchetti@holmdeltownship-nj.com; taxa@eatontownnj.com; eserfass@twp.howell.nj.us;
kpeel@townshipofwall.com; dcpnj@comcast.net; taxcompomanowsk
; joerahman
;
jcasagrande@townshipofwall.com; Schenk, Veronica; aworth@mtnj.org; Holly.Reycraft@aberdeennj.org
Subject: RE: 8th Annual Monmouth Conference

All,
JustanupdatetheStatehasapprovedthiscoursefor5AppraisalCreditsand1PTACredit.
Ifyouhavenotalreadyregistered,pleasetakethetimetodosonow.

148

Lookingforwardtoseeingyouthere!!!

Erick

From: Erick Aguiar [mailto:erick.aguiar@cityofasburypark.com]


Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:57 AM
To: 'skineavy@aberdeennj.org'; 'pbarnett44
'; 'vbutchon@hamiltonnj.com';
'Erick.Aguiar@cityofasburypark.com'; 'emagnani@holmdeltownship-nj.com'; 'cnplanners@optonline.net';
'emullane@oceantwp.org'; 'Assessor@tintonfalls.com'; 'jgillooly@irr.com'; 'aworth@interlakenboro.com';
'ahcessr
'; 'gibbsboroassessor
; 'Asstx@AOL.com'; 'wfitzpatrick@townshipofwall.com';
'gscaglione@hazlettwp.org'; 'check@middletownnj.org'; 'ghutchinson@twp.howell.nj.us'; 'jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us';
'spezar@twp.brick.nj.us'; 'rfrotton@marlboro-nj.gov'; 'taxassessor@manasquan-nj.com'; 'MImbriaco@twp.freehold.nj.us';
'taxassessor@twp.berkeley.nj.us'; 'ppatom@comcast.net'; 'bhaney@neptunetownship.org';
'benright@springlakeboro.org'; 'djtuftgal
'; 'emullane@oceantwp.org'; 'benright@oldbridge.com';
'george@microsystems-nj.com'; 'Lacey.taxassessor@laceytownship.org'; 'clauver@middletownnj.org';
'byrnet
; 'mclark@co.monmouth.nj.us'; 'dcrozier@neptunetownship.org'; 'tomre
;
'joann.huza@aberdeennj.org'; 'dankelly1
'wlaird@ci.long-branch.nj.us'; 'emarchetti@holmdeltownshipnj.com'; 'taxa@eatontownnj.com'; 'eserfass@twp.howell.nj.us'; 'kpeel@townshipofwall.com'; 'dcpnj@comcast.net';
'taxcompomanowsk
; 'joerahman
; 'jcasagrande@townshipofwall.com';
'Veronica.Schenk@co.monmouth.nj.us'; 'aworth@mtnj.org'; 'Holly.Reycraft@aberdeennj.org'
Subject: 8th Annual Monmouth Conference

All,

Weareonlyacoupleweeksawayfromthe8thannualMonmouthConferencewhichisbeingheldattheSheraton
EatontownHotelon2/6/14.Ifyouhavenotalreadydoneso,pleasesendyourregistrationtoGeorgeLockwood.
Attachedisthebrochure.ItisunderstoodthatitisabusytimeoftheyearwiththeAssessmentDemonstration
Programsnewcalendar,howevermembersofourassociationshouldattendtoshowsupport.Ifanyonehasany
questions,directthemtoGregHutchinson@7329386242.

Seeeveryonethere,

ErickAguiar,CTA
Assessor
CityofAsburyPark
1MunicipalPlaza
AsburyPark,NJ07712
7325025750

149

Clark, Matt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Daniel M Kelly <dan@panterandkelly.com>


Friday, April 05, 2013 10:26 AM
'jbutow'; Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us; ahcessr
RE: FW: Innovators Insights | April 4, 2013

YesandmakesurethetherearebannersacrosstheauditoriumsMATTCLARKMATTCLARKMATTCLARKwitha
pictureofhimsquattingastationwagon

DK
Cell(732)7577838

From: jbutow [mailto:jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us]


Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 10:15 AM
To: Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us; dan@panterandkelly.com; ahcessr
Subject: RE: FW: Innovators Insights | April 4, 2013

Nice. Should Steve start booking speaking engagements?


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

-------- Original message -------From: "Clark, Matt" <Matt.Clark@co.monmouth.nj.us>


Date: 04/05/2013 9:54 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Daniel M Kelly <dan@panterandkelly.com>,ahcessr
Subject: FW: Innovators Insights | April 4, 2013

,jbutow <jbutow@ci.long-branch.nj.us>

From: Callas, Stephen


Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 9:33 AM
To: Clark, Matt
Subject: Innovators Insights | April 4, 2013

Matt,

Scroll down to public finance section. Congratulations. You have put a Monmouth County shared service on
one of the most prestigious international maps in the public sector. I will make certain the Administrator and
Freeholder are made aware. THIS IS A BIG DEAL! GREAT JOB!
150

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen