NOTICE and DEMAND

From: [Your strawman name]

100 Any Street.
Any Town, Any Prov. PO Code

Date:_______________
SIN: ___________________

Attention;
THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
COMMISSIONER FOR CRA
CRA (Area Office)
Re: Non-Payment of Demanded Refund Of Withheld Wages
Take notice that a T1 Return of Income for the taxpayer, (strawman name) was filed on or about ( date),
for the taxation year _________ , and, as no income tax was owing, as shown on that T1 Return of
Income, the wages of the undisclosed principal for whom this party is agent in commerce and trustee in
trust of all monies or assets collected for and held in account for the undisclosed principal who is a living
free will adult man, and who was and is not subject to any provisions of the Income Tax Act of Canada
nor subject to the harvesting of the fruits of the labour of a slave owned by the corporate Crown in Right
of Canada by way of an income tax, were demanded to be refunded in full in that T1 Return of Income.
Any and all monies, currency or other asset values collected by, and under the name, (strawman name), is
a trust situation, and thus not the property of, nor the equitable possession of (strawman name), who is a
mindless and bodyless entity incapable of giving value to anything by way of exchange of labour for
currency.
You are hereby placed on notice that whereas, all assets, monies or other property received and held in
trust by the entity (strawman name) are for the undisclosed principal and primary creditor, the free will
adult man commonly called (John) of the (Doe) family, who has a superior claim in equity upon all such
assets, monies and property held or collected by (strawman name).
And whereas, the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family is the source of labour
which has been converted to assets, monies and property held in trust by the fictional entity, (strawman
name).
And whereas, the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family only uses
Her Majestys property, the legal name, (strawman name), by and under PRIVATE NECESSITY only.
The free will adult man has not voluntarily attached himself to that legal identity name, and therefore is
not surety or guarantor of any debts imposed upon that legal identity name, nor is he the property of Her
Majesty or Crown by way of attachment.
And whereas, CRA and/or The Crown in right of Canada has only legal claim for debts imposed by the
Crown upon the Crown owned entity, (strawman name), and has no right of claim against the equity
assets, monies and property held in trust by (strawman name) for the free will adult man commonly
called John of the Doe family. Equity prevails over law (legal).
This notice is not disputing the right of Canada to impose the income tax upon persons,
the Crown owned legal name, and any adult human who is knowingly and voluntarily attached to the
legal identity name as a natural person, or, upon artificial persons; but Canada, or the Crown in Right
of Canada, has no right or authority to impose the income tax upon a living free will adult man, where
1

that party has not voluntarily accepted/acknowledged that legal name as being one and the same as him
or her self.
And whereas, CRA legal claims, or imposed debts upon the bankrupt entity, (strawman name) are not the
responsibility of the beneficiary of trust, thus garnishment or the non-refunding when demanded to do so
of the assets in trust is an unlawful act by CRA against the beneficiary.
And, since the legal name, (strawman name) is the property of the Crown in Right of Canada, or of a
Province of Canada, and Canada Revenue Agency is an agency of the Crown in Right of Canada,
therefore, a trust where the Crown owned legal name is trustee in trust, and the Crown owned CRA
corporate agency confiscates or converts currency, monies or assets held in that Crown trust by way of
extorting that in trust asset through the excuse of taxation of the Crown trustee in trust, where the
beneficiary is not Crown owned property, there appears to be a Criminal Breach of Trust, as per the
Criminal Code of Canada, Section 336:
Criminal breach of trust
336. Every one who, being a trustee of anything for the use or benefit, whether in whole or in part, of another
person, or for a public or charitable purpose, converts, with intent to defraud and in contravention of his trust,
that thing or any part of it to a use that is not authorized by the trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 296.
And, relative to a demanded refund, I refer you to the Criminal Code of Canada, Section 337 :
Public servant refusing to deliver property
337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a
province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt,
custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to
demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.
As Trustee in Trust, this party/person, (strawman name) hereby demands the requested refund as stated
in the T1 Return of Income heretofor mentioned in this notice be sent to this party forthwith. As trustee
in trust this party is authorized by the undisclosed principal and beneficiary to make this demand.
Sincerely,
I, commonly called John of the Doe family, a free will adult man,
and scribe for the entity, (strawman name written) for Her Majesty in right of Canada

ASSERVATION and NOTICE

Court name and location (if applicable)
Page 1 of 3
Affiant: (Strawman name)
Respondent: Her Majesty, the Queen in Right of Canada
*The Crown Attorney
*Presiding Judge
2

Case # ___________________
Date: _____________

(* or. Canada Revenue Agency Appeals Commissioner

1. Comes (Strawman name) as agent for the free will man, commonly called
________________ family, the undisclosed principal, and says:

_____________ of the

2. Whereas, this party believes that where Her Majesty is referred to in this asservation, it means Her Majesty,
The Queen of the vassal State of Great Britain, as agent for the corporate Crown of the City of London, which
in turn, is the agent for the Holy Roman Empire of the Pontiff of Rome.
3. Whereas, this party believes that the legal identity name, (Strawman name) is the property of the Her Majesty
in right of the Province of ____(birth province)_________, under agency, and was provided by that corporate
entity to be agent in commerce for the free will adult man (male or female) commonly called ________ of the
__________ family, and trustee in trust of all value created through exchange of labour or through risk by that
free will adult man, commonly called ________ of the __________ family - this being the only lawful use of
the legal identity name by Her Majesty, or by the free will adult man with whom it is associated.
4. And whereas, this party believes that the primary reason for this arrangement was/is that there is no asset
value money available in the land called Canada to pay for anything, either by a contractor/ employer or by any
human in any capacity within society or living on the land.
5. And whereas, this party believes that the adult man to which the legal identity, (Strawman name), is
associated is mandatorily obligated to use the legal identity name in all transactions with the currency, with
corporations and with Government, under the rule of private necessity to sustain his or her life, and to avoid
harassment, intimidation tactics and possible physical injury and damage to themselves by ignorant officers of
the Crown who do not know the difference between an adult free man, and a person, a corporate property of the
Crown, and thus, they assume that all men are persons and property of the Crown.
6. And whereas, this party believes that this mandatory obligation imposed upon the free will adult man can not,
and does not, by use of, association with or attachment to the legal identity, impose a voluntary contract of
servitude upon, nor invoke the legal maxim, 'accessio cedit principali' upon the associated free will man, that
would change his or her status to 'citizen, subject, person or freeman' - any of those status being an adult man
claimed to be subject to, or owned as property by Her Majesty, or by the corporate Crown of the City of
London. If such status of subject is imposed under colourable authority by some agency of government upon an
adult free will man, it would constitute unlawful involuntary servitude being imposed upon that free will man.

ASSERVATION and NOTICE

Court name and location (if applicable)
Page 2 of 3
Affiant: (Strawman name)
Respondent: Her Majesty, the Queen in Right of Canada
The Crown Attorney
Presiding Judge

Case # ___________________
Date: _____________

6. And whereas, this party believes that even though the legal identity name, (Strawman name), may be
erroneously shown to be an 'employee', 'payee', 'beneficiary', 'owner', or other recipient of valuable assets found
on documents received by, or found by, agents of Canada Revenue Agency, or by a Crown Attorney, that legal
identity name has added no value to it, as that party has no mind or body, and thus no mental and/or physical
labor to exchange for currency or for any valuable assets.
3

7. And whereas, this party believes that the free will adult man to which the legal identity name, (Strawman
name), is associated is the party who has exchanged his or her labor, under the unalienable right of property
with claim of right in equity, a claim superior to a legal claim made by the Crown or Her Majesty, or by any
party not having lawful equitable claim to those assets; and thus, is creditor of all assets collected or held in
trust in the name of (Strawman name), a debtor. A free will adult human is subject only to his Creator diety, and
is not subject to another man, or fictional corporate body acting in any capacity.
8. And whereas, this party believes that the free will adult man, for whom the legal identity name, (Strawman
name) is agent in commerce and trustee in trust, naturally has license to exercise and use all unalienable rights
available to free men. Those include, but are not limited to: life, liberty, property, due process of law, and the
pursuit of happiness; and, all of these are not subject to the legislative restrictions which may be imposed upon
men who are, or may be property of the Crown, with that being imposed by contract or by association with the
Crown owned legal identity name in a voluntary and disclosed manner by that free will adult man.
9. Therefore notice. Any party that has a claim upon, or that may claim against, the legal identity name owned
by Her Majesty (strawman name), and has, or is considering the issuance of a, bill, charge, fine, order,
judgment, invoice, warrant, execution, or any other thing to or against the legal identity name, (strawman name)
for the payment of money or performance of an obligation, any such claim has no applicability nor obligation of
surety imposed upon the adult free will man, the undisclosed principal and undisclosed beneficiary to and for
whom the legal identity name (strawman name) is associated as agent in commerce and trustee in trust; as, the
free will man is not subject to any acts, statutes, laws, rules or regulations of the fictional entity called
Government, or any other corporate body, nor to the enforcement of any of these upon him or her by an officer
or agency of the Crown in right of any division or branch of Government. Such unlawful action by the Crown
would/will be an act of piracy and plunder against a free lawfully commanded vessel the free will adult man,
who is subject only to Gods Law - Do no harm.

ASSERVATION and NOTICE

Court name and location (if applicable)
Page 3 of 3
Affiant: (Strawman name)
Respondent: Her Majesty, the Queen in Right of Canada
*The Crown Attorney
*Presiding Judge
(* or. Canada Revenue Agency Appeals Commissioner

Case # ___________________
Date: _____________

10. Caveat: Failure by the named respondents to respond with full rebuttal of any and all points on this affidavit
will be an admission of intent of malfeasance against this affiant by the named respondents, and shall be
deemed to be an act of treason against this sovereign adult free will man who is obligated by necessity to use
Her Majesty's property/legal identity name in commerce.
Sincerely and by the truth,

I, commonly called John of the Doe family for ___ (Strawman name hand written) ____
for Her Majesty in right of Canada

[These documents are templates, so add to, alter or delete as your own situation demands.]

[Delete notes and instructions in brackets within text]

[Note: Hand write a check signing signature for strawman - remainder typed]
[Signature should be witnessed by a Notary Public - if refused by notary, then get 3 people to witness
your signature and sign {Witness _______________________} Add this note:
{Note: Witness of signature refused by Notary Public, (name, if available)} ]