Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This test is conducted by two methods namely Order of Merit Rating and Paired
Comparison test. In the Order of merit rating test the jury the jurors rank the
advertisements as per their preference. The consensus emerges about the best
ad copy at the end. But the best may be the best amongst the worst ones.
In the paired comparison test at a time two ad copies are compared one-to-one.
Every single ad is compared with all others. Sources are recorded on cards. They
are summed up. The winner gets the highest score. This technique is easier than
order of merit. Till ten copies, there is good accuracy; which later decreases. The
number of comparisons one is required to make with the help of the following
formula:
n. (n-l) / 2
Where n= the number of ads to be rested.
Portfolio Test:
Along with the regular advertisements some dummy copies are kept in a folio.
Then the consumer-sample sees the folio. The consumer is then asked about
what he has seen in each ads. The ad giving minimum playback is considered
the best. But then it is necessary to observe whether the chosen advertisement
is dummy or regular. If found dummy the actual one is improved on the same
lines.
Mock Magazine Test:
Unlike the above method of keeping the advertisements in a folio, test ads are
introduced in a real magazine to an experimental group to read. The control
group is also exposed to the same magazine, but is without test ads. Later a
recall test is conducted to assess the effectiveness I test ads.
Direct Questioning:
A consumer jury is formed and either the whole ad or its different elements are
tested by asking direct questions. Sometimes there is one single question only
and sometimes an elaborate questionnaire is prepared to assess attention
strength, read-through strength, affective strength and behaviour strength of the
ad. For each component the copy is allotted some points. Each ad is rated from
the best to the worst.
Perceptual Meaning Studies (PMS):
In this method the respondent is exposed to test the ads for a limited time
period. Tachistoscope is an instrument that may be used in this test. After the
respondent sees the advertisement, he is subjected to a recall test for the
product, brand illustration and the main copy.
Pre-tests for Broadcast Media Advertisements:
All the above methods can be applied to broadcast media also. In addition, some
special methods are available to pre-test broadcast media ads TV and radio
ads. The techniques used are:
In Home Projection Tests:
A movie projector screen is installed at consumers home to show him the test
commercials. He is questioned before and after the exposure to the
advertisements. The questions are related to the ad and the change it causes
after exposure. The strong and weak points of the ads can be assessed.
Trailer Tests:
Two groups of customers are considered. Both are given discount coupons to
purchase the brand under consideration and are invited to shop in a real life
shopping environment, a departmental store, a shopping centre etc. The
prospects are invited to the display their products. Now one group is shown the
test ads whereas the other group is not. The redemption rate of coupons is
measured for both groups which may give an idea about the effectiveness of test
ads.
Theatre Test:
A group of people who could be a captive audience for an entertainment
programme is considered and a questionnaire is sent to them. The free tickets
are later sent to them for the programme where the test ads are run. On viewing
these, they are asked to fill up another questionnaire. It assesses product, brand
and its theme.
Live Telecast Test:
The advertisements are put on air either by narrow casting or live telecasting.
These ads are test ads, and not the regular ads. Later, viewers are interviewed to
know their reactions.
Some Other Pre-Testing Techniques:
Sales Experiment:
Before a product advertisement is launched nationally, a small ad campaign of
one or more advertisements is run. Two or more test centres are selected to do
so. The ads are run for a fixed period say one to four months and then the sales
responses are noted. It is a very useful and effective measure for FMCG items
and those ads who aim to motivate buyers to take an immediate sales action.
Direct Mail Tests:
A group of prospects are selected from the mailing list randomly and are sent
different test ads. Then to measure the response, the orders against each lot are
noted.
Physiological Testing:
In this test, rather than what respondents say, what is considered more
important is the physiological reaction of the respondents. Three principal
instruments to do so are:
Eye Movement Camera:
It measures how the eye moves over the layout of test ads. The route taken by
the eye and also the pauses are noted so that the areas of interest and attention
can be judged.
Galvanometer:
It measures skin responses to ad stimuli like perspiration by gland activity
through palm. More perspiration decreases the resistance and faster current
passes. The tension is generated. The greater it is, the more effective the ad is.
The technique is of limited use for ads of a very sensitive nature.
Perceptoscope or Pupilometric Devices:
They record changes in pupils dilatation. Dilatation indicates reading and
attention. Contraction shows dislike of the respondent to what is being read. It
evaluates interesting appealing visual stimuli. It is developed by Eekhard Hess
and James Polk. Left eye is photographed to record dilatation.
Pre Testing is also called copy testing by some experts. Copy testing is a
specialised field of marketing research, it is the study of television commercials
prior to airing them. Although also known as copy testing, pre-testing is
considered the more accurate, modern name (Young) for the prediction of how
effectively an ad will perform, based on the analysis of feedback gathered from
the target audience. Each test will either qualify the ad as strong enough to meet
company action standards for airing or identify opportunities to improve the
performance of the ad through editing. (Young)
We saw various tests which are all pretests. Following is another classification of
pretest or copy tests. There are four general themes woven into the last century
of copy testing.
Report Card Measures:
The first theme is the quest for a valid, single-number statistic to capture the
overall performance of the advertising creative. This search has spawned the
creation of various report card measures. These measures are used to filter
commercial executions and help management make the go/no go decision about
which ads to air. (Young). The predominant copy testing measure of the 1950s
and 1960s, Day-After Recall (DAR) was interpreted to measure an ads ability to
break through' into the mind of the consumer and register a message from the
brand in long-term memory. Once this measure was adopted by Procter and
Gamble, it became a research staple.
But every thing was not that bright about these tests. In the 70s, 80s, and 90s,
tests were conducted to validate a link between the recall score and actual sales.
For example, Procter and Gamble reviewed 10 years worth of split-cable tests
(100 total) and found no significant relationship between recall scores and sales.
(Young) In addition, Wharton Universitys marketing guru Leonard Lodish
conducted an even more extensive review of test market results and also failed
to find a relationship between recall and sales. Harold Ross of Mapes & Ross
found that persuasion was a better predictor of sales than recall.
Diagnostic Measures:
The second theme is the development of diagnostic copy testing, the main
purpose of which is optimisation. Understanding why diagnostic measures such
as attention, brand linkage, and motivation are high or low can help advertisers
identify creative opportunities to improve executions. (Young)
But then again this method was not perfect. Different approaches have been
developed by research companies to determine the report card measures of
attention, brand linkage, and motivation. For example, Unilever analysed a
database of commercials triple-tested using the three leading approaches to
the measure of branding (Ameritest, ASI, and Millward Brown) which shows that
each of the three is measuring something uncorrelated with, and therefore
different from, the other two. (Kastenholtz, Kerr & Young).
Non-Verbal Measures:
The third theme is the development of non-verbal measures in response to the
belief of many advertising professionals that much of a commercials effects
e.g. the emotional impact may be difficult for respondents to put into words or
scale on verbal rating statements. In fact, many believe the commercials effects
may be operating below the level of consciousness. (Young) According to
researcher Chuck Young, There is something in the lovely sounds of our favorite
music that we cannot verbalize and it moves us in ways we cannot express.
(Young, p.22)
Moment-by-Moment Measures:
The fourth theme, which is a variation on the previous two, is the development of
moment-by- moment measures to describe the internal dynamic structure of the
viewers experience of the commercial, as a diagnostic counterpoint to the
various gestalt measures of commercial performance or predicted impact.
(Young)
In the early 1980s, the shift in analytical perspective from thinking of a
commercial as the fundamental unit of measurement to be rated in its entirety,
to thinking of it as a structured flow of experience, gave rise to experimentation
with moment-by-moment systems. The most popular of these was the dial-ameter response which required respondents to turn a meter, in degrees, toward
one end of a scale or another to reflect their opinion of what was 011 screen at
that moment.
But then the things were not that easy. Unless the dial-a-meter is calibrated by
normalising the data to each individuals reaction time, the aggregate sample
data will be spread across many measurement intervals. Second, dial-a-meters
contain an uncertainty range around which moment is actually being measured
because of differences in respondent response times. Relatively little has been
published to validate dial-a-meter diagnostics to traditional measures of overall
ad performance such as recall and persuasion.
Post-Testing:
Post-testing or Ad tracking, as otherwise known, can be customised or
syndicated. Tracking studies provide either periodic or continuous in-market
research monitoring a brands performance, including brand awareness, brand
preference, product usage and attitudes. Advertising tracking can be done by
telephone interviews or online interviewswith the two approaches producing
fundamentally different measures of consumer memories of advertising, recall
versus recognition.
Purpose of Post Testing:
The purpose of ad tracking is generally to provide a measure of the combined
effect of the media weight or spending level, the effectiveness of the media buy
or targeting, and the quality of the advertising executions or creative. Some
newer forms of online tracking, separate the issues of the quality of the creative
component from the quality of the media buy and instead focus on the relative
performance of ads versus the competitive ads that are airing at the same time.
All forms of tracking data are used to provide inputs to Marketing Mix Models
which marketing science statisticians build to estimate advertising return on
investment (ROI).
Some ad tracking studies are conducted by telephone while others are
conducted on the Internet. The two approaches produce very different measures
of advertising awareness because the interviews tap into consumer memories of
advertising using fundamentally different measures, recall versus recognition.
For example, with an Internet study, the respondent can be shown a few
memorable, de-branded still images from the TV ad or a de-branded version of a
print or Internet ad and then answer three significant questions:
i. Do you recognise this ad? (Recognition measure)
ii. Please type in the sponsor of this ad. (Unaided awareness measure)
iii. Please choose from the following list, the sponsor of this ad. (Aided awareness
measure)
A telephone survey does not allow for visuals. Verbal descriptions are very
difficult to provide for a campaign that has several ads featuring the same
character(s) in the same situation with only slight changes. Telephone is not
considered a flexible enough methodology to be used in all situations.
Penetration Tests:
Daniel Starch had given the details of this test for the first time in his book
Principles of Advertising (Chicago- A W Shaw, 1923). These tests are also known
as Recognition/Readership Viewership tests. They are aided recall tests dating
back to 1923. Since then they have been conducted in the US by the Daniel
Starch Organisation. Here, the respondents are shown the issues of magazines
they claim to have read. They are asked to recognise the ads, asked whether
they have read them. The results are put into three categories:
(i) Noted (N): A person who only remembers having seen the ad in the issue
under study
(ii) Seen-Associated (A). A person who not only remembers seeing it but also
claims to have seen or read some part of it. He may even associate the ad with
the product or advertiser
(iii) Read-Most (RM). The person who has read half or more of the written
material in the ad.
The above categories of readers are expressed in percentage terms. This method
is also adaptable to broadcast ads where commercial advertisements on tape are
played. McGown (1979) gave the following formula to calculate Readers per
Dollar:
Readers peere Dollar = Percent noted X Magazins primary readers / Space cost
in Dollar
This method however is not error free. This method is always subject to reporting
errors by the respondents. They might deliberately exaggerate or at times
unknowingly suppress information. At times they guess answers to please the
interviewer and hide the fact that he or she has not seen the advertisements.
There are however some methods as follows which might increase the efficiency
of measurement.
i. The tachistoscopic method: Advertisements are shown to the respondent,
either whole or part, at high speed; and then they are asked to furnish
information based on those ads.
ii. The screen method: Several screens are put over an ad which are then
removed one by one an recognition is obtaited at various levels of visibility.
iii. Two more methods often used by researchers are Pre-publication control
which requires a recognition survey of previously unpublished advertisements
and confusion contra methods where some unpublished advertisements are
mixed up with some published ones and then recall is measured.
Gallup-Robinson Impact Test:
PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
It is a type of qualitative or motivational research adapted from clinical
psychology. It permits the respondents to direct questioning, projective
techniques permits respondents to indirectly project their views or feelings about
the advertising situation. The following types of projective techniques are used:
1. Depth interviews: Here, respondents are shown advertising material and
promoted to discuss it freely. A trained interviewer, usually a psychologist,
probes the respondent about his underlying feelings and motivations.
2. Word Association and Sentence Completion Tests: These are a little
more structured than the depth interview. Key words or sentences are
used as stimuli, to which the respondent replies by projecting his
thoughts. These words and sentences are taken from ads being tested.
This way, the researcher can determine what they mean to the consumers.
3. Thematic Apperception Tests: In this method, pictures of people in
ambiguous situations are shown to respondents. Respondents are asked to build
a story around these pictures, by projecting their opinions and feelings into
the story.
Post-testing
The evaluation of the effectiveness and impact of an advertising campaign either during or after the campaign's
run.
Post testing answers a wider range of questions, more specified, and generally inexpensive.
Post testing calculates how advertising performed.
It examines whether the conditions of introduction and purchase are genuine, not imitated.
This makes post testing basically more accurate, simple and less expensive.
Recognition-based post testing allows a wider range of questions to be answered.
Post-testing Methods :
These tests are conducted after running the ad campaign. The basic purpose of post-testing is to
provide an insight into the performance of ad campaigns & draw some conclusions from it about
the future conducting of advertisements.
The various post-testing methods are:
In the enquiry method the reader is offered something in return for his inquiry letter. This is
called inquiry testing.
In the coupons response method, the person sending the coupon has to supply certain
information to the advertiser.
In this method a group of selected respondents are asked to indentify advertisements they have
seen in the publications they read. They are asked to classify the ads as noted, seen, and
associated & readmost.
Recall Tests:
In this test a group of respondents who have seen the newspaper or magazine where the
advertisement had appeared is selected. A few questions are asked on order to verify the
respondent & have gone through the advertisement.
In this test method attempts to find out the effectiveness of an advertisement, in the light of
consumers evaluation of the company & its brands of product. It is presumed hat when
attitudes are favorable, the demand for the product is generated & the consumers are likely to
buy the product & vice versa.
In order to find out the effectiveness of the ad campaign, the increase in sales in both the cities
will be collected & studies. The increase in sales of a product will indicate the success of the
campaign. In case there is decline in the sales or if the sales do not increase, it indicates that the
campaign has failed.