Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The case study is about Androids is under attack as it was already in the news,
and what made Androids a tastier target was the fact that Enronaa was not the
first time. Its start from they had used accounting practices that allowed Enronaa
to hide its debts, but really these are all within the context of fair value
accounting. Androids was critics that the auditors were incompetent, at worse,
they deliberately overlooked irregularities at Enronaa in order not to lose the
lucrative stream of consulting and other work it provided. Androids also had prior
entanglements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Androids
agreed to pay the SEC a civil penalty of USD 7 million to settle charges related to
the firms work as auditors of Solid Waste. This issue is the US SEC found
Androids guilty of issuing materially false and misleading audit reports on Solid
Waste financial statements for the period 1993 through 1996.
Then, Androids also issued an audit report on Solid Wastes financial statements
in which it stated that the companys financial statements were presented fairly,
in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) and that Androids had conducted its audit of those financial
statement in accordance with generally accepted auditing standard (GAAS). So,
SEC found that Androids representations were materially false and misleading.
While, Solid Wastes financial statements were not presented fairly, in all
material respects, in conformity with GAAP. Androids had allowed the
management of Solid Waste to use improper accounting to inflate its operating
income and other measures of success. It was the largest restatement of results
in the history of the SEC. Besides that, SEC found Androids failed to ensure that
all known misstatements were quantified and all likely misstatements were
estimated. SEC also found that Androids knew or was reckless in not knowing
that the auditors of the financial statements on which Androids issued
unqualified audit reports during those years that were not conducted in
accordance with GAAS. Androids thereby, engaged in improper professional
conduct.
The Solid Waste case followed Androids decision to pay USD 110 million to settle
a lawsuit on audits at Sunbeamic, another US client found to have less than
reliable accounts. David and Ken knew that the firm would be in deep trouble for
its role in Enronaas collapse. Androids were already under probation with the
SEC and another scandal in the likes of Enronaa would mean the end of their
business. The sessions would pressure Androids auditors to view accounting
issues Enronaas way. Androids knew that what Enronaa wanted and usually
sought to give it to them. The Enronaa account had become so lucrative for
Androids that the firm was unwilling to step away.
2.
4. Despite of pay 110m, Android should obey the law punishment and
make improvement to next audit services they conduct. - Admit the
guilty
Advantages: by obey the law and regulations, Android may have to pay penalty
for huge amount. However they may not losing their client because client are
realised android are not take for granted about their responsibility.
Disadvantages: SEC will charge big amount of penalty to Android.
Disadvantages: android may lose his close client because he applies strict
rules and regulation.
of independence. Other than that, audit firm should look more closely at the
relationship between auditors, managers and the company audit committee. In
addition, Auditors should be rotated every few years to prevent long-term, close
ties between the management and audit firm to ensure the independence of an
auditor towards their audit opinion. Lastly, we would like to recommend that all
companies need to build a robust ethics infrastructure and follow it in the daily
business. For example, Androids might need to rebuild their policy such as
comply with by-law principles to ensure their auditor professionalism. And they
also need to ensure the policy is strong enough, it is to make sure all auditors will
comply with it. Other than that, audit firm must ensure that one auditor is only
available for one responsibility in a company. Thus, the professionalism will be
good enough for the audit firm.
6.