Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
GENERAL
GUIDELINES FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
FOR SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECTS
LEAD ORGANIZATION:
ALTERNATE HYDRO ENERGY CENTRE
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ROORKEE
CONTENTS
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Item
Page No.
1
1
3
5
6
8
10
10
10
11
11
Baseline Data
3.1
Land Environment
3.1.1 Land Use
3.1.2 Drainage Pattern
3.1.3 Soils
3.1.4 Catchment Profile (Directly Draining)
3.1.5 Geomorphology/Geology
3.2
Air and Water Environment
3.2.1 Water Quality Parameters
3.2.2 Hydrological Data
3.2.3 Meteorology
3.2.3.1 Seasonal-monitored data (monthly basis)
3.2.4 Air Quality
3.2.5 Noise
3.3
Biological Environment
3.3.1 Aquatic
3.3.2 Terrestrial
3.3.2.1 Flora
3.3.2.2 Fauna
3.4
Socioeconomic Environment
3.4.1 Demographic Profile (gender based
details of the population)
3.4.2 Details of Villages to be Affected
3.4.3 Village wise Land Details
3.4.4 Details of Families to be Displaced
3.4.5 Infra Structure Development
3.4.6 Cultural Sites
3.4.7 Health Profile
16
16
16
17
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
22
22
22
23
23
23
20
21
21
21
21
21
Item
4.3
4.4
Section 5
Section 6
Section 7
Page No.
24
24
25
26
26
26
28
28
29
32
32
32
33
33
42
42
and
Group
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
43
44
45
45
45
47
47
47
47
48
49
49
49
49
50
50
51
52
Item
Page No.
58
58
59
59
59
59
Annexure I
Useful References
64
Annexure II
66
Section 8
Annexure III
Annexure IV
Annexure V
59
60
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
62
62
62
63
63
72
75
77
SECTION 1
GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND NEED FOR
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECTS
Developing countries need increased energy supplies in order to bring about
improvement in the quality of life of their people. Sustainable and environmentally sound
progress towards energy self reliance is probably best achieved through development of
renewable energy sources as these will eventually be the only sources available to sustain the
societies. Out of various renewable energy sources, small hydropower is the only source which
has sufficient potential to accommodate remote area needs. Although the adverse
environmental impacts of individual small hydropower project (SHP) may not be significant and
yet, the aggregate impact of several such projects in vicinity could be of a magnitude to cause
significant damage to the environment.
1.1
In India, depending on the capacities, small hydropower projects are categorized as Micro, Mini
and Small hydro projects as under.
Pico
: upto 5 kW
: upto 2000 kW
change depends on the selected site configuration. An illustrative site configuration is shown
below. The environmental impacts of SHPs are positive (favourable) and negative (undesirable)
in nature.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
Adverse Impact
Construction of road,
dam,
power
house
by work force
3. Visual intrusion caused by construction activity
4. Disturbance of recreational spots (e.g. waterfalls) and
activities
Construction
of
transmission line
Stream
diversion
conduit
Ponding
1. Flow disruption
2. Channel degradation during generation or spilling and
flushing of silt from dam
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
of
population
(c)
submergence
of
of
hydropower station
Peaking operation of
power station
1.3
POSITIVE IMPACTS
Positive environmental impacts of hydropower projects are somehow ignored as a
routine probably due to the fact that these projects are conveniently considered as demanding
an environmental price. It is equally important to highlight and quantify (to the extent possible)
positive environmental impacts of SHPs.
Positive Socio-Economic Impacts
1. Most convenient energy source commercially available at the door steps
2. Multiplier effect of electricity on economy of the area especially in remote areas
3. Development of agro-industrial units in remote areas
4. Improvement of agricultural produce
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
towards
vegetation
and
plantation
associated
with
the
project
(compensatory afforestation)
7. Improved habitat
8. Lake shore environment in otherwise dry areas
9. Modification of micro climate due to storage and regulation of water to a more or less
uniform pattern. This also leads to a somewhat stabilizing impact on local environment
influencing flora and fauna aquatic as well as terrestrial.
10. SHPs are environmentally more friendlier than conventional large hydro plants:
a. Non-involvement of setting up of large dams and thus not associated with
problems of deforestation, submergence or rehabilitation
b. Non-polluting and environmentally benign. It is one of the least CO2 emission
responsible power sources, even by considering full energy chain right from the
impact of production of plant equipment etc.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
c. Least impact on flora and fauna (aquatic and terrestrial) and biodiversity.
1.4
MEANING OF EIA
EIA is an activity designed to identify, predict and describe in appropriate terms the
primary and secondary changes due to a proposed action. Such actions may include policies,
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
plans, programmes and projects. EIA covers the biophysical environment, mans health, the
quality of life and social environment, and communicates results in a form which is
understandable by the community and decision makers. Thus, EIA is required not only for a
particular hydropower project but also for a set of projects (existing and proposed) under a plan
or a programme.
The EIA should contain descriptions of both the likely beneficial and adverse impacts
(short
and
long-term).
The
EIA
approach
should
be
inter-disciplinary,
systematic,
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
SHPs. Standards and guidelines are required to help concerned agencies in carrying out EIA in
a systematic and scientific manner and thus avoiding delay in clearance of the projects.
Keeping the above in view, these guidelines have been prepared to address needs of
SHPs. The following aspects are covered in this manual:
various acts and decision making process as followed in India for obtaining
environmental clearance.
Useful references
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
SECTION 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTS AND PROCEDURES FOR CLEARANCE OF
HYDROPOWER PROJECTS IN INDIA
2.1
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTS
Adequate provisions for protection of environment and forests are made in the
Constitution of India. Article 47 provides for protection and improvement of health. Article 48(A)
is directed towards protection and improvement of environment and protection of forest and
wildlife. Article 51(A) says it is the duty of every citizen to protect and improve natural
environment. Following the UN Conference on Human Environment (Stockholm, 1972), a
constitutional amendment (42, 1976) inserted relevant provisions for environment protection in
Constitution in Part IV Directive Principles and Part IVA Fundamental Duties.
In order to ensure sustainable development from water resources angle the Government
of India has enacted various Acts and Legislations. Prominent among these is the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986 through which the Government has acquired wide powers for protecting
the environment. Some other acts related to Water and Environment are Water (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) (Cess) Act, 1977 (amended in 1991), Forest Conservation Act, 1980,
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification of MOEF 2006 and the Ministry of
Environment and Forests Notification of January 1977 constituting the Central Ground Water
Authority (CGWA).
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 seeks to maintain or restore
wholeness of water and the Central and State Pollution Control Boards have been established
under this Act. According to the Water Cess Act, 1997, both Central and State Governments
have to provide funds to the Boards for implementing this Act. The Forest Conservation Act,
1980 provides for compensatory afforestation to make up for the diversion of forestland to nonforest use. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 was enacted in 1986 for the protection and
improvement of human environment.
Recently, Government of India has constituted Water Quality Assessment Authority
(WQAA) vide MoEF/Nc. J-15011/8/2000-NRCD dated 29th May, 2001 under the chairmanship
of Secretary, MOEF, exercising the powers under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. This
authority exercises the powers and functions under the said Act for several functions. Some of
these relevant to hydropower projects are given below:
To make measures so as to ensure proper treatment of waste water with a view to restoring
the water quality of the river water bodies to meet the designated best uses
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
To maintain minimum discharge for sustenance of aquatic life forms in riverine system
To deal with any environmental issues concerning surface and ground water quality referred
to it by central Government or the State Government relating to the respective areas, for
maintaining and/or restoration of quality to sustain designated best-uses.
Name
Protection
Environment
Protection Act, 1986
Environmental
Clearance
Notification, 2006 OF
MoEF (GOI)
National Policy on
R&R, 2003 of Min. of
Rural Development,
GOI
Key areas
Operational
agencies/key
players
Central and State
Pollution Control
Boards
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
2.2
obtain environmental clearance from the MOEF, Government of India. However, in order to
assess the impacts of the developmental projects/activities on the environment, MOEF issued a
gazette notification on the EIA on January 27, 1994 (as amended on May 04, 1994) and made
environmental clearance statutory for all the projects located in ecologically sensitive/fragile
areas as notified by the Government of India from time to time, besides various categories of
the projects as specified in the schedule of the notification. These also include water resource
development (WRD) project. MOEF has issued a revised gazette notification on 14th
September, 2006 suppressing the earlier notification of January 27, 1994. The new gazette
notification is based on National Environment Policy which was approved by Union Cabinet on
18th May, 2006. Flow chart depicting procedure of environmental clearance is given in Figure
2.1. Flow chart depicting appraisal procedure is shown in Figure 2.2.
2.2.1
to deal with environmental clearance for all new project and expansion/modernization of
existing projects.
Central Government in Ministry
of Environment and Forests
State Environmental
Assessment Authority (SEIAA)
General Conditions
Any project or activity specified in category B will be treated as category A if located in
whole or in part within 10km from the boundary of (i) protected area notified under Wild Life
(Protection) Act, 1972 (ii) critically polluted areas as notified by Central Pollution Control Board
from time to time, (iii) notified ecosensitive area, (iv) interstate boundaries and international
boundaries
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
10
All kinds of projects located in ecologically sensitive/fragile area (e.g. Doon Valley in
Uttaranchal and Aravali range in Rajasthan etc.) as notified by the Government of India from
time to time have to obtain environmental clearance compulsorily irrespective of the size, cost
and whether they are listed in the schedule of the EIA notification or not. All the projects located
in/near wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, wetlands, mangroves, biosphere reserve also need
environmental clearance.
Therefore, even a small hydropower project (<25 MW) will require environmental
clearance from competent authority if:
(i)
(ii)
the project in conjunction with existing or proposed hydropower projects may have
cumulative adverse impacts.
2.2.3
11
determine whether or not project requires EIA report (termed B1 type project). If EIA is not
required then it is B2 type project. MOEF will issue guidelines from time to time for
categorization as B1 and B2. For categorization of projects into B1 or B2, the Ministry of
Environment and Forests shall issue appropriate guidelines from time to time.
Stage (II) Scoping
Scoping refers to the process by which the Expert Appraisal Committee in the case of
Category A projects or activities, and State level Expert Appraisal Committee in the case of
Category B1 projects or activities, including applications for expansion and/or modernization
and/or change in product mix of existing projects or activities, determine detailed and
comprehensive Terms Of Reference (TOR) addressing all relevant environmental concerns for
the preparation of an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Report in respect of the project or
activity for which prior environmental clearance is sought. The Expert Appraisal Committee or
State level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned shall determine the Terms of Reference on
the basis of the information furnished in the prescribed application form including Terns of
Reference proposed by the applicant, a site visit by a sub- group of Expert Appraisal
Committee or State level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned only if considered necessary
by the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned,
Terms of Reference suggested by the applicant if furnished and other information that may be
available with the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee
concerned. All projects and activities listed as Category B shall not require Scoping and will be
appraised on the basis of application form and the conceptual plan.
It is required for category A and B1 projects. Purpose is to determine detailed and
comprehensive terms of reference for preparation of EIA report.
For category A, hydroelectric project item 1(c) (i) of schedule of TOR shall be conveyed
along with clearance for preconstruction activities.
Stage (III) Public consultation
Public Consultation refers to the process by which the concerns of local affected
persons and others who have plausible stake in the environmental impacts of the project or
activity are ascertained with a view to taking into account all the material concerns in the project
or activity design as appropriate.
It is required for category A and B1 project with some exceptions e.g. modernization of
irrigation projects, expansion of roads and B2 type and projects, projects concerning national
defence and security. MOEF (2006) has specified procedure for conduct of public hearing.
Purpose is to take into account concerns of local affected persons and others who have
plausible stake in environmental impacts. Based on this, appropriate changes in the draft EIA
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
12
and EMP shall be made. Applicant may submit a supplementary report to draft EIA for
appraisal.
The detailed methodology for public consultation is explained in SECTION 6.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
13
14
APPRAISAL
EAC/SEAC meeting
Applicant makes presentation
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
15
SECTION 3
BASELINE DATA
LAND ENVIRONMENT
3.1.1
Land Use
Land use and land cover patterns are important in environmental impact assessment
study from the point of view that land use describes the present use such as agriculture,
settlement etc. and land cover describes the material on it such as forest, vegetation, rocks or
building etc. Land cover of the 10 km radius study area with reference to the site can be derived
using latest cloud free satellite imageries. The data is geo-referenced using SOI 1:50000 scale
toposheets with the help of standard data preparation techniques in GIS software such as
ERDAS IMAGINE. Interpretation of the geo-referenced data is done using standard
enhancement techniques and ground truthing. The land use is explained in terms of type and
areal extent i.e. dense vegetation, medium vegetation and sparse vegetation which refers to the
crown cover density of >40%, 10-40% and <10% respectively. The major components may be
as follows:
(a) Land details for various project components (in ha)
(b) Agriculture:
(i) Irrigated
(ii) Un-irrigated
(c) Forest type (with density of vegetation)
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
16
Attribute
Parameter
Land Use
LAND ENVIRONMENT
Land use pattern
Soil
Geology
Seismology
Seismic Hazard
5
6
Water Resources
Water Quality
Hydrology
Meteorology
10
Noise
11
Ecology
12
Aquatic Ecology
13
Socio-economic
aspects
WATER ENVIRONMENT
Catchment Area, Flow, Design
Physical, Chemical and
Biological parameters
Drainage area and pattern
SPM, RPM, SO2, NOx and
CO
Temperature and Relative
humidity
Temperature, Relative
humidity, Rainfall, Wind Speed
and Wind Direction
Noise levels in dB (A)
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
Flora & Fauna Diversity
Density & diversity of aquatic
species
SCIO-ECONOMIC
Socio-economic characteristic
of the affected area
Source
District Planning Map
Field studies, GIS based
information
Project Pre-Feasibility Report
Pre-Feasibility Report
Project Pre-Feasibility Report
Field studies
Project Pre-Feasibility Report
Field Studies
Field Studies
India Meteorological
Department
Field Studies
Field Studies, Information
from Forest department and
Literature Study
Field studies, Fisheries
Department, Literature review
Field Studies, Literature
review.
Drainage Pattern
(a) Data regarding flash floods, frequency of occurrence
(b) Ground water strata
(c) Springs
3.1.3
Soils
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
17
The locations for collection of soil samples should be well distributed to represent the
spatial variation in project area. The soil samples are to be analysed for the following
parameters:
(a) Land capability classification (for agricultural land)
(i) Physical properties of soil (soil texture, porosity, particle size distribution)
(ii) Chemical properties of soil (pH, electrical conductivity, cations, anions)
(iii) N, P, K content
3.1.4
3.1.5
Geomorphology/Geology
(a) Data with reference to the entire project area (rock type, slopes, strata, minerals etc.)
(b) Seismic zones/classification
(c) Data pertaining to occurrence of earthquakes
3.2
3.2.1
(composite) should be collected and analysed for examination of water and wastewater as per
the standard procedure such as given in Protocol
(http://www.cwc.nic.in/main/HP/download/ProtocolforWaterQualityMonitoring.pdf)
or
the
relevant code of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The details for conducting water quality
assessment are given in Section 5. These water samples are to be assessed for the following
parameters:
(a)
3.2.2
Hydrological Data
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
18
Air Quality
(a) Season wire/air quality (SPM, NOX, SO2, CO)
(b) Construction material required (Table 3.2)
(c) Dust emissions
(i) Quarry sites
(ii) Haulage roads
(iii) Construction activity
(iv) Stone crusher
Means of transportation
(source to storage site)
with justification
Noise
(a) Major sources of noise in the project area (stationary and mobile)
(b) Level at source (dB)
(c) Level at project boundary (dB)
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
19
3.3
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.3.1
Aquatic
Aquatic ecosystem to be studied over an area atleast between 2km upstream of the
project site and atleast 2 km downstream of the project site. The study should include the
following:
(a) Fish species of commercial value
(b) Resident species
(c) Migratory species, their spawning ground, fish morphology, anatomy, feeding
pattern, breeding pattern etc.
Aquatic ecological analysis may be made following the methods outlined in Wetzel and
Likens (1991) and APHA (1998). Periphyton, phytoplankton, macrobenthos and zooplankton
should be studied for frequency, density, abundance and diversity indices.
3.3.2
Terrestrial
An inventory of flora, listing of rare, endangered, economically important and medicinal
plant species should be prepared and their frequency, abundance and density should be
determined. Quadrate method is generally used for sampling.
3.3.2.1 Flora
(a) Major forest products and dependability of the local communities on these such as
fuel wood, edible species, construction material etc.
(b) Forest type
(c) Trees, shrubs, herbs
(d) Rare and endangered species
(e) Endemic species
(f) Economically important species
3.3.2.2 Fauna
(a) Aerial distance of National Park/Sancturay/Biosphere Reserve etc., if any in the
vicinity, from the project site
(b) Rare and endangered species
(c) Endemic species
(d) Species of special interest to local population and tourists
(e) Migratory route of animals, if any, in the project area
3.4
SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
3.4.1
3.4.2
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
20
3.4.4
Name of
village
Population
Homestead oustees only
Tribal
Others
3.4.5
3.4.6
Cultural Sites
(a) Places of worship
(b) Archeological sites/monuments
(c) Anthropological sites
3.4.7
Health Profile
(a) Existing health
(b) Screening of the facilities urgent labour
(i) No. of persons to be employed for construction (average and during peak
period)
(ii) No. of persons to be employed from the affected population
(iii) Details of temporary labour colonies
(c) Disease surveillance
(i) Endemic health problem
(ii) Epidemic prevention and control
(iii) Probability of the occurrence of malaria etc.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
21
SECTION 4
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
4.1
LEVELS OF EIA
The potential scope of a comprehensive EIA system is considerable and can include
appraisal of policies, plans, programmes and projects. Even if policies were not environmental
in nature, they might still have severe environmental implications.
The top tier of EIA application would be a Policy EIA which attempts to assess the
environmental and health implications of national policies. For example, agricultural policies
may cause severe ecological impacts or energy policies will influence the demand for natural
resources and affect industrial development. At a lower level a Plan EIA would seek to identify
key environmental factors affecting land use such as agricultural land quality and resources
exploitation.
EIAs could assist in the identification of preferred areas where certain types of
development might be encouraged. A Programme EIA would be prepared for a series of like
projects, such as in a river basin development scheme in which different hydropower projects
including SHPs may be constructed at different times. A Project EIA would be undertaken when
local environmental issues are particularly important for individual projects. It should be
recognised that EIA is not a universal panacea, it may have restricted use in certain areas of
decision-making. Most EIA experience is related to projects (Project EIA); very few plan EIAs
have been undertaken.
4.2
EIA PROCEDURE
The key activities are screening, scoping and assessment which will be discussed in
detail in following sections. These steps require intensive interaction between the human
resources and information resources available for a proposed project.
Finally, an EIA has to be organized to address certain specific topics. Most EIAs cover
the following features:
Description of the proposed location or study area, including information about physical
resources, ecological resources, human and economic development and existing quality of
life
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
22
Monitoring,
4.2.1
Screening
Screening is a procedure which aims to identify, as early as possible, those projects with
potentially significant impacts, that should therefore be subject to EIA. Projects can be
investigated and, if no significant impacts are anticipated, they can then be exempted from
further environmental analysis. According to MoEF guidelines, Category B projects or activities
(see section 2) are subjected to scrutiny by concerned State Level Expert Appraisal Committee
for determining whether or not the project or activity requires an EIA. Those requiring EIA are
termed as B1 project and those not requiring EIA are termed as B2 project. For categorization
of projects into B1 or B2, the MoEF shall issue appropriate guidelines from time to time. A
number of approaches to screening can be identified. These are listed and discussed below:
Project thresholds,
Locational criteria,
4.2.1.1 Thresholds
Thresholds may be developed on the basis of size, cost or pollution levels. For example,
in India, a policy has been established (MoEF, 2006) that all hydropower projects with installed
capacity less than 25 MW would not be subject to prior environmental clearance by competent
authority. This approach, unfortunately, neglects the implications of several small hydropower
developments in vicinity, each below the threshold, but which in combination may cause
significant adverse impacts and thus should be subject to EIA.
4.2.1.2 Locational criteria
Locational criteria usually involve designation of sensitive areas, for example nature
preserves, national parks, historical/religious sites and biospheres. Thus any project or activity
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
23
in category B will be treated as category A if located in whole or part within 10 km from the
boundary of protected areas/critically polluted areas/notified ecosensitive areas etc.
4.2.1.3 Positive and negative lists
The approach is based upon a list of proposed projects for which an EIA is always
required (positive list) and a list for which no EIS is required (negative list). Initially, some work
is needed to justify the inclusion of one project and the exclusion of another.
Example: individual industries located in notified ecosensitive zone (positive list)/biotech parks
(negative list)
4.2.1.4 Initial environmental evaluation
An initial environmental evaluation (IEE) approach requires considerably more
understanding of a project and its environs than the approaches described previously. IEEs
operate on a project-by-project basis and consequently it is impossible to make generalizations
as to which project will be subject to an EIA. However, the RA is an essential precursor to an
IEE since it provides sufficient information on pollution loads and levels to allow decision to be
made on the need for an EIA.
An IEE-approach is presented in the UNEP guidelines (United Nations Environment
Programme, 1980) for the assessment and siting of industry. This approach requires a
systematic identification of possible interactions between the characteristics of the proposed
development, and those of the size and surroundings. Both an interactions matrix and
screening tests may be needed for this approach.
There are several general criteria that can be used when making a decision as to the
environmental effect of an activity. These criteria are not mutually exclusive but are very much
interrelated.
Magnitude : This is defined as the probable severity of each potential impact. Will the impact
be irreversible? If reversible, what will be the rate of recovery or adaptability of an impact area?
Will the activity preclude the use of the impact area for other purpose?
Prevalence : This is defined as the extent to which the impact may eventually extend as in the
cumulative effects of a number of stream crossings. Each one taken separately might represent
a localized impact of small importance and magnitude but a number of such crossing could
result in a widespread effect. Coupled with the determination of cumulative effective is the
remoteness of an effect from the activity causing it. The deterioration of fish production resulting
for access roads could affect sport fishing in an area many miles away and for months or years
after project completion.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
24
Duration and Frequency : The significance of duration and 1frequency can be explained as
follows. Will the activity be long-term or short-term? If the activity is intermittent, will it allow for
recovery during inactive periods?
Risks : This is defined as the probability of serious environmental effects. The accuracy of
assessing risk is dependent upon the knowledge and understanding of the activities and the
potential impact areas.
Importance : This is defined as the value that is attached to a specific area in its present state.
For example, a local community may value a short stretch of beach for bathing or a small
marsh for hunting. Alternatively, the impact area may be of a regional, provincial or even
national importance.
Mitigation : Are solutions to problems available? Existing technology may provide a solution to a
silting problem expected during construction of an access road or bank erosion resulting form a
new stream configuration.
While single screening approaches may be applied, they may also be used in
conjunction with each other. Screening techniques can, therefore, vary in sophistication, but
there is considerable merit in keeping this activity as simple as possible. A simple approach
such as a positive and negative list approach, will allow both the development proponent and
the authorizing agency to clearly understand EIA requirements in advance. This approach may
need to be reinforced with an IEE approach in order to accommodate non-listed projects.
Alternatively, a simple questionnaire approach may be acceptable.
4.2.2
concentrates on identifying those issues which require in-depth analysis. Scoping has the
following specific objectives:
To identify the major environmental issues that must be assessed in the EIA.
and it is a procedure that allows interested persons to state their concerns before an EIA is
undertaken. Participation of the public in scoping is important because it may help identify
people who have useful knowledge about the proposed site. It also allows them to propose
alternatives and suggest the kind of study that should be undertaken. Scoping is the first stage
in creating public confidence in EIA and the decision-making process (US Council on
Environmental Quality, 1981).
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
25
developer which contains the preliminary information. This may allow any serious issue
associated with a proposal to be identified early on.
4.3
matrices, network and overlays manuals. These represent the most widely used methods.
Before discussing these methods, it should be noted that evidence for their partial utility is often
limited. Whenever possible evidence relating to this important aspect of methods will be
considered.
4.3.1
Checklists
The checklists method lists local environmental factors, which are likely to be affected
where a development is planned. This list can contain broad categories of factors, for example,
flora, fauna, hydrological regimes, surface water bodies and the atmosphere. Conversely, it can
be extensive and detailed. An example of checklist is given Table 4.
Another useful type of checklist is the "questionnaire", which presents a series of
questions relating to the impact of a project. Checklists are used to provide answers to specific
questions relating to the particular project being assessed. Once an initial question has been
answered in the affirmative, additional questions investigate the nature of particular impacts in
detail.
There have been many attempts to develop checklists by the use of weighing and
scaling. Numerical weights are assigned to items of a checklist in accordance with the relative
importance of each item. Scaling is a procedure for reducing impacts on all items to a common
arbitrary scale. These methods have not been widely used because of their complexity, cost
and extensive data requirements. Also, they can be politically controversial due to the need to
assign weights for relative importance to environmental components.
4.3.2
Interaction matrices
A development of basic checklists is the interaction matrix. The most well known is the
Leopold matrix development for the U.S. Geological Survey (Leopold et al, 1971). The matrix
consists of a horizontal list of development activities displayed against a vertical list of
environmental factors. The matrix is used to identify impacts by systematically checking each
development activity against each environmental parameter. If it were thought that a particular
development activity were to affect an environmental component, a mark is placed in the cell
which occurs at the intersection of the activity and the environmental component. It should be
noted that the matrix can be expanded to cover the construction and operational phases of
various components on horizontal scale or more than one alternative can be represented on the
horizontal scale.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
26
PROJECT PHASE /
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
A.
1
2
IMPACT
POSITIVE
3
4
5
6
7
8
B.
9
10
11
12
13
14
C.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
D.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
NO
CHANGE
SHORT
TERM
LONG
TERM
NEGATIVE
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
27
After the initial identification of impacts, it is possible to use the same matrix to indicate
those impacts considered to be the most important. In the original Leopold matrix, scores from
a 1-10 scale can be assigned to describe the importance and magnitude of individual impacts.
Importance refers to the significance of an impact and magnitude to its scale and extent.
Leopold-type matrices are easy to use and perhaps the most widely employed and successful
of all EIA methods.
4.3.3
Network
This method, although widely discussed in the EIA literature, has not been used as
extensively as matrices and simple checklists. It was developed to explicitly consider the
secondary, tertiary and higher order impacts that can arise from an initial impact. Checklists
and matrices structure thinking towards impacts on single environmental entities. When using a
matrix the effects of vegetation clearance, for example, are considered in relation to all listed
environmental components. With this approach to impact identification, there is a danger that
linked impacts are omitted. In this case, vegetation clearance can have an initial or primary
impact on both soils and animal and bird life. However, the impact on soils can result in erosion
and this can increase the sediment load in rivers. This sediment load can, in turn, affect life of
reservoir and various forms of aquatic life. Should the river support a commercial or
recreational fishery, then any changes in aquatic structure might have economic repercussions.
4.3.4
Overlays
The overlays approach to impact assessment involves the use of a series of
transparencies. The study area is subdivided into convenient geographical units, based on
uniformly spaced grid points, topographic features or differing land uses. Within each unit, the
assessor collects information on environmental factors and human concerns, through various
sources/techniques. The concerns are assembled into a set of factors, each having a common
basis and regional maps (overlays) are drawn for each factor. The degree of impact or
importance of each factor is represented by varying the degree of shading with light shading
indicating low impact and heavy shading the highest impact. The overlays are then stacked one
on the other using the same reference points and the total degree of shading is visually
observed. Those areas on the maps with the highest shading are thus the most acceptable
alternatives. Because of the reduction in light transparency with each overlay, only about 10
maps or overlays can be used.
This method is easily adaptable for use with a computer which may be programmed to
perform the tasks of aggregating the predicted impacts for each geographical subdivision and
of searching for the area least affected. Automated procedure can be used for selecting
sequence of unit areas for routing highways, canal network, pipelines, and other corridors. The
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
28
computer method is more flexible, an advantage whenever the reviewer suggests that the
system of weights be changed.
The overlay approach can accommodate both qualitative and quantitative data. For
example, water is often shaded blue while land elevation can be shown by contour lines. There
are, however, limits to the number of different types of data that can be comprehended in one
display. A computerized version thus has greater flexibility. Although in this case, too, the
individual cartographic displays may be too complex to follow in sequence, the final maps
(optimum corridors for each alternative, and comparisons amongst alternative) are readily
prepared and understood.
When using overlays, the burden of ensuring comprehensiveness is largely on the
analyst. Also, the approach is selective because there is a limit to the number of transparencies
that can be viewed together. Finally, extreme impacts with small probabilities of occurrence are
not considered. A skilled assessor may indicate in a footnote or on a supplementary map,
however, those areas near proposed corridors where there is a possibility of landslides, floods,
or other unacceptable risks. Overlays do have some strong features too. For example, overlays
may be mutually exclusive provided that checklists of concerns, effects, and impacts are
prepared at the outset and a simplified matrix-type analysis is undertaken. Also, the objectivity
of the overlay method is very good with respect to the spatial positioning of effects and impacts
(e.g., area of land to be flooded), but is otherwise low. Overlays are not effective in estimating
or displaying uncertainty and interactions.
4.4
SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
A hydropower project generally requires construction of the diversion barrage, headrace
tunnel, powerhouse etc. Construction of the project facilities would require acquisition of land,
out of which part may be the government/forest land and the remaining private land owned by
the individuals. Expropriation of private lands may cause social disruption and economic loss
for the project affected families/people. The workers, which will be migrating in the project area
during construction, would also cause certain demographic and social changes, since the
project is normally situated in remote area.
A survey should be undertaken to study and understand the socio economic conditions
of these project-affected households and to examine the impact of the proposed project
thereupon.
Socio-Economic Profile of Project Affected People (PAP):
It should cover analysis of the following:
Educational Attainment:
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
29
Occupation\
Family Income
Marital Status
Enlistment
Infrastructure Facilities
30
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
31
SECTION 5
WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM
Assessment of potential impacts of a hydropower development to water quality first
requires an effective plan to acquire sufficient baseline information to make the assessments.
At the time of construction activities begin, a modified monitoring program is necessary to
evaluate the effectiveness of measures to prevent adverse effects to water quality. Ultimately,
additional modifications to the monitoring plan are needed to evaluate the actual effects of the
project on water quality and to enable identification of unanticipated effects and/or ineffective
protection measures. The first monitoring plan, to develop a baseline of the information, should
be a component of the Terms of References (TOR) developed within the Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) process. The second and third modifications to the baseline monitoring
program are to be presented in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) which is a part of
the EIA report.
5.1
5.1.1
the discharge of wastewater (both construction waste water and sanitary waste water from
workforce housing areas) to the adjacent river and runoff from quarries and construction areas.
Discharge of wastewater from construction areas that may affect water quality include
discharge of water used to wash concrete mixing and hauling equipment, wash water used to
prepare concrete aggregate, and other minor on-site discharges of water to the river system.
Generally, the effect is an increase in suspended sediment loads and an increase in alkalinity of
the water due to discharge of calcium carbonate (CaCO3), a component of concrete. However,
dissolved solids may also increase significantly as a consequence of runoff from the
construction area. If excavated material is deposited in or adjacent to the river channel,
suspended solids concentrations and dissolved solids concentrations may increase further. Of
particular concern with deposition of spoil materials is the potential for increasing
concentrations of heavy metals such as iron, manganese, copper, lead, and other heavy
metals.
Deposition of suspended solids in the river channel downstream from the construction
area may cause changes in the river channel if significant amounts of sediment is contributed to
the river, and may cause problems with spawning areas of fish in the downstream reach of the
river.
Discharge of sanitary waste from work camps and other human sanitary facilities can
affect Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in the river as well as increasing fecal coliform
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
32
operation. At this time the affected river has been partitioned into two major components:
Upstream of the project site and Downstream of the project site.
5.1.2.1 Water quality effects upstream of the project site
In general, a hydropower project can not and should not directly affect water quality
conditions upstream of the project site. Any realized changes in water quality are generally
attributable to changes in land use patterns, changes in population distributions and changes in
industrial or commercial installations in the upper river basin. Consequently, any changes in
water quality conditions upstream will be reflected in changes in water quality downstream.
Management of land use, population distribution and industrial development upstream is
basically the only option available to minimize these impacts.
5.1.2.2 Water quality effects downstream of the project site
The more significant effects of a hydropower development on water quality, at least from
the perspective of ecological characteristics and human use, are generally realized in the river
downstream of the project site. The magnitude of the changes in water quality parameters
realized downstream from the project are attributable to the operating regime of the project
which defines the hydrologic regime. Aside from the alteration of the hydrologic regime, two of
the more common water quality parameters that are affected by a small hydropower
development in the downstream reach are water temperature and dissolved oxygen.
While the temperature regime in the river is not necessarily considered an adverse
condition, it is the changes in the biological community that are affected by those changes that
can become significant. The temperature regime of a river may affect the types of organisms
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
33
that are able to survive in the affected reach, the biological productivity within the reach
(generally, biological production is positively correlated with temperature in aquatic systems),
and the reproductive cycles of aquatic organisms downstream from the project. It should be
noted that although some species may cue reproductive cycles on water temperature, other
species cue their cycles on changing hydrologic regimes that may or may not be correlated with
seasonal changes in water temperature. Therefore, the significance of predicted changes in
water temperature must be framed in reference to the biological requirements of the organisms
inhabiting the river downstream of the project.
5.2
straight forward. Though the development cycle, three basic monitoring programs will be
designed and implemented corresponding to the baseline description period (EIA), construction
period, and operation period.
The primary purpose of the baseline monitoring program are twofold: First, the baseline
monitoring program should provide sufficient information to enable accurate (justifiable)
predictions of potential effects of the hydropower project on water quality parameters; second,
the baseline data set will provide the standard against which project effects and/or mitigation
effectiveness can be determined. Obviously, it is necessary to determine the starting point
condition to determine if changes occur.
The purpose of the water quality monitoring program for the construction period,
likewise, can serve two purposes: First, the program should be designed to enable evaluation
of the effect of various construction activities and construction related facilities on water quality;
second, certain components of the program can provide further baseline information for
determining the effect of project operation on water quality.
The purpose of the final water quality monitoring program to be implemented during
operation also has two purposes: First, data collected during the operational period are
compared with the baseline data to determine if projections made in the EIA are accurate and
mitigation or avoidance measures are effective; second, the monitoring program can be used to
determine if changes occur during the operation period and might require attention and can be
used as a basis to determine the sources of any pollutants.
5.3
SAMPLING DESIGN
Design of the water quality monitoring program is key to obtaining a useful set of
information for describing baseline conditions and measuring the effects of construction and
operation on those conditions. Thus, the sampling design presented in the monitoring plans is
the most important part of the plan.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
34
5.3.1
Duration
The duration of the water quality monitoring programs will vary according to the stage in
project development.
For baseline monitoring, the minimum length of time necessary for basic understanding
of cycles in water quality parameters is one year. The baseline monitoring program should
provide sufficient information on all parameters included in the monitoring program to
demonstrate annual cycles in concentrations or conditions. While the data set should provide at
least one full year of sampling, continuing monitoring for longer periods would facilitate
understanding of year-to-year variation in those parameters. Consequently, the baseline
monitoring program should be implemented for as long as possible given the schedule for
project construction and completion.
Determination of the duration of the construction period monitoring program should
correspond to the construction period, including preparatory period. In addition to monitoring
the effects of construction, continuation of monitoring parameters included in the baseline
program will provide additional foundation for measuring the effects of the project once it
becomes operational.
The duration of the monitoring program to be implemented during operation of the
project will depend upon specific conditions at the project. For some parameters, the monitoring
program could extend throughout the life of the project. For other parameters, sampling for a
period of up to 5 years will provide an adequate basis for evaluating the effect of the project.
5.3.2
Sampling frequency
As defined above, recommended parameters for inclusion in the baseline, construction
period, and operational period include two groups: Those for general monitoring and those for
assessment monitoring.
During the baseline period (EIA preparation), parameters included in general monitoring
should be measured on at least a biweekly basis, preferably on a weekly basis for one full year.
Parameters included for the assessment monitoring include some parameters that should be
measured on a monthly basis, with the remainder measured on a quarterly or seasonal basis
through the planning phase of the project.
The sampling frequency during the construction period, particularly for parameters that
may be affected by construction activities should be measured at least on a monthly basis
throughout the construction period. Parameters that are included in the general monitoring
program and contribute to the baseline descriptions should be measured at the same frequency
as determined for the planning (EIA) phase.
The sampling frequency of parameters during the operational phase may be divided into
two periods: Initial effects and long-term effects. The basic operational monitoring program
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
35
should include sampling of the various parameters on at least a monthly basis for a period of up
to 5 years after initial operation of the project. Once the initial period expires, the monitoring
program may be reduced to include the only a few basic, indicative parameters. If significant
changes in one or more of the basic monitoring parameters occur, expansion of the monitoring
program for a specified period of time may be necessary to identify the cause of those changes.
In general, during the long-term monitoring phase, the basic set of parameters should be
sampled on a monthly basis.
5.3.3
Sampling Locations
The number of sampling locations for water quality will depend on the particular project
configuration. For single projects (located on a single river), a minimum of three sampling
locations is needed for both baseline monitoring and construction and operation monitoring.
For construction monitoring, additional locations may be included to enable evaluation
of possible pollutants from various areas of the construction facilities. For example, an
additional location might be downstream from construction staging areas or downstream from
labour camps. If some of these facilities are located on the tributaries of the main river, the
samples should be collected upstream and downstream from those facilities.
5.3.4
particularly those included in the general monitoring group, may be measured in the field with
appropriate instrumentation and/or field kits. The remaining parameters generally require
transport of water samples to a laboratory for analysis. For parameters that require laboratory
analysis, sample bottles and containers with appropriate preservatives, if necessary, can
normally be obtained from the laboratory. A preliminary list of water quality laboratories (private,
governmental and non-governmental) is presented in Annexure 1. A list of possible field
equipments to conduct the monitoring program is included in Annexure 2. As with any field or
laboratory instrumentation, it is necessary to standardize the equipment according to
manufacturer specifications throughout the field effort.
All samples should be clearly labeled with an identifying number and all pertinent
information regarding the sample recorded on separate data sheets for each location and
sampling time. A sample data sheet for use in the field should be presented as part of the
proposed monitoring plan. In addition to the field data sheets, it is highly recommended that a
Chain of Custody form also be used to document delivery of the samples from the field to the
laboratory. Samples collected for analysis in the field should be taken to the laboratory as soon
as possible. The length of time a sample may be held prior to analysis can be determined in
consultation with the laboratory.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
36
The water quality monitoring plans should include a section on the logistics of data
collection and sample handling. Information to be included in the water quality monitoring plans
should include the field and laboratory procedures that will be used to analyze the samples.
There are a number of Standard Methods for analysis of water quality. The particular methods
that are to be used should be cited in the monitoring plan.
Statistical analysis of the results of the water quality analysis will generally vary from
phase to phase and project to project. For baseline monitoring, particular attention should be
given to identifying seasonal cycles and longitudinal trends. The data may then be used to
estimate how the project will affect each parameter. In some cases, it will be appropriate to use
the data for calibration of one or more water quality simulation models. Relatively simple
models are available to determine the effect of a project on water temperature and dissolved
oxygen in the river.
The most important component of the data analysis during the construction and
operating periods is comparison of the pre-project condition or baseline condition with the
construction and operating conditions. Such analysis will determine if and by how much impacts
to water quality have occurred and are used as determinants of the effectiveness of any
mitigation measures that have been incorporated into the project configuration. As construction
and operating data are acquired over the duration of the monitoring program, additional
analysis of trends in water quality changes may be identified from the monitoring data. Such
trend analysis might include seasonal changes as well as changes that occur gradually through
the years.
5.3.5
institutions responsible for collecting the samples and for conducting the analysis of those
samples. Measurements of water quality parameters in the field and collection of the water
quality samples for analysis in the laboratory may be performed by trained field technicians
employed by the environmental consultant. Samples collected for laboratory analysis should be
conveyed to the laboratory according to the protocol furnished by the selected water quality
laboratory.
5.3.6
Quality Control
An issue that should be addressed in the water quality monitoring plans relates to
quality assurance that the data presented are accurate and reliable. An acceptable quality
assurance program will consist of both external and internal controls by the laboratory providing
the analytical evaluations of samples.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
37
First, the developer and/or the environmental consultant should implement an external
quality control procedure. The procedure should at least include submittal of duplicate samples
from one or more locations on each sampling data. These samples should be blind samples
such that the water quality laboratory is unaware of which samples are duplicated. A second
possible component of an external quality control procedure could consist of periodic submittal
of duplicate samples to a second laboratory, one not responsible for the routine analysis
process.
Second, the quality control procedures adopted by the water quality laboratory should
be presented in the plans. An acceptable procedure should include duplication of samples by
the quality control officer of the laboratory after submittal of the sample to the laboratory but
prior to delivery to the laboratory technicians. The procedure should also include submittal of
blank samples and spiked samples (samples with known concentrations of a parameter) to
the laboratory technicians for analysis. Reports from the laboratory should include results of the
internal quality control procedure for review by the developer/environmental consultant and the
reviewing agencies.
5.3.7
Reporting
Reporting of water quality data will be dependent upon the phase of the water quality
monitoring program. Data and analysis of those data obtained during the pre-construction
phase are to be presented in the EIA. As appropriate raw water quality data should be
presented with the EIA to enable independent evaluation of results. A condition of the TOR may
include a requirement for submittal of the water quality data in a standardized format for
incorporation into a country wide data base. The water quality data should be submitted with
the EIA.
Reporting of results of the construction and operation monitoring program will also be
submitted to the concerned agencies for review. The schedule for reporting the data will be
negotiated as part of the approval of the EMP and will likely become conditions of the license to
construct and operate the project. An appropriate schedule for reporting of results from the
monitoring of construction activities would be on a quarterly basis. This will depend on the
monitoring program itself and the frequency with which samples are being collected.
Reporting of results of operation monitoring will likely be divided into two phases: an
initial phase for a period up to five years with reporting on a semiannual basis and a second
period following the initial period with reporting on an annual basis.
5.4
REGULATORY AUDIT
In developing the regulatory audit procedure for a given hydropower project, the
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
38
1. Purpose
The comprehensive audit will cover all aspects of engineering, environmental and social
considerations regarding the project. With respect to water quality, the regulatory audit will seek
to determine if projections of the EIA are accurate and whether or not measures to mitigate
anticipated adverse effects are effective. Thus, the objective of the regulatory audit of the water
quality monitoring program is to confirm the results of the monitoring program are accurate.
2. Acquisition of information and sampling design
The regulatory audit of water quality monitoring will consist of two components: first, the
audit will consist of a detailed review of data reported by the developer and construction
contractor, including a review of the water quality control procedures and results implemented
by the developer; second, the audit consist of an independent analysis of water quality
conditions at the project site. This will consist of acquisition of measurements and samples in
the same manner and location defined in the EMP. An independent laboratory, one not involved
in the continuing monitoring program, should be selected to analyze the samples. Selection of
the laboratory may consist either of using the governmental laboratory or another laboratory.
3. Analysis
Analysis of results of the regulatory audit will consist of two factors: first, the data will be
compared with available water quality standards established for hydropower projects; second,
the data will be compared with results of the monitoring program submitted by the developer.
4. Presentation and reporting
Results of the water quality component of the environmental audit are to be included in
the environmental audit report submitted to the government.
5.5
Pre-construction phase
The basic presentation and interpretation of water quality information obtained during
the pre-construction, EIA phase of project development is primarily the responsibility of the
developer/environmental contractor. The interpretation will focus on two primary components:
water quality conditions in the river in its current condition (i.e. description of the baseline
condition) and projections of any anticipated changes in water quality conditions through
construction and operation of the project.
When reviewing water quality analysis presented in the EIA, the following questions
should be considered:
Do the results comply with the specifications defined in the TOR for monitoring water quality
parameters ?
Do the results adequately describe existing water quality conditions in the river prior to
project construction ?
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
39
Do the results demonstrate seasonal and annual variation in water quality conditions ?
If adverse water quality impacts are expected, are the proposed mitigation measures and
water quality management programs appropriate and what is the probability that the
measures will be effective ?
What are the potential effects of operation on water quality in the reservoir and downstream
from the reservoir ?
If adverse water quality impacts are expected, what are the proposed mitigation measures
and will they be effective ?
If there is some uncertainty pertaining to potential water quality impacts or the effectiveness
of a mitigation measure, what mechanism is available to remedy any unforeseen impacts or
failures in the mitigation measures ?
Construction phase
The developer/environmental consultant is required to conduct a water quality
monitoring program during the construction phase. As discussed previously, some parameters
may be monitored primarily to extend the baseline data to describe water quality conditions in
the river prior to operation of the project. However, the more important component of the
construction phase monitoring program will focus on the effectiveness of measure to manage
contamination of water in the river resulting from various construction activities.
Review of the reports of the water quality monitoring program should consider the
following questions:
Are results for all parameters defined in the water quality monitoring plan for the
construction phase presented in the report ?
For each parameter measured, is there evidence that construction activities have led to
changes in water quality in the river downstream from the construction site(s) ?
Based on the results presented, is the management of runoff from the construction sites
effective ?
Are any of the results unexpected in that they indicate deviations from previous
measurements; are significantly different from baseline data, or are significantly different
from expected results ?
Has the developer/ environmental consultant proposed remedial measures to correct the
deviations or differences if it is clear that the differences are due to actions of the
construction contractor ?
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
40
Operation phase
Results of the water quality monitoring program implemented once a project becomes
operational are to be reviewed based on the baseline conditions, the effectiveness of any
mitigation measures and comparison with what conditions were expected as set forth in the
EIA. In conducting the review, the reviewer must consider whether or not any changes in
observed water quality conditions constitute a significant degradation or improvement in water
quality of the river. If some water quality parameters differ from exceptions, the reviewer must
also consider whether or not those changes are acceptable based on the analytic procedures
used in making those predictions. This consideration must be made because many analytic
processes may not be able to accurately predict future conditions because of the inherent
variability of environmental conditions.
When reviewing results of the monitoring program conducted during the operational
phase of the project, the following questions should be considered:
Are the results compatible with base conditions and predictions of water quality conditions
presented in the EIA ?
Do seasonal changes observed in the results consistent with anticipated seasonal changes
as described in base conditions and anticipated conditions ?
Are there significant changes in one or more parameters from reporting period to reporting
period ?
Has the developer provided explanations of why have any observed changes occurred ?
If after several reporting period, certain water quality parameters indicate a gradual change,
has the developer explained why is that trend(s) occurring ?
If significant, unexpected changes in water quality conditions have occurred that are
attributable to facilities and/or operation, has the developer suggested any measures to
adjust facilities or operating regimes to remedy the problem ?
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
41
SECTION 6
STAKE HOLDERS IN EIA PROCESS
government agencies and their representatives at various levels (center, district, local), from
concerned ministries and departments;
local influentials from affected area, such as informal or traditional community heads, school
teachers, healers, social and religious leaders, and other notable women and men;
health workers;
social workers and marginal group workers (such associations or organizations dedicated to
the upliftment of the poor, the landless, women, children and other vulnerable groups); and
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
42
Generally speaking, those most directly affected by a project are clearly among the key
stakeholders they are at the greatest risk, they feel the impacts most intensely, they benefit
the most from opportunities; hence, they should be the first to be involved. The poor, landless,
vulnerable and marginalized people are among these stakeholders, and it is they who are often
the most difficult to get involved.
Since local people will be stakeholders over most of the life of a project, their
involvement and participation from the beginning is crucial to project success. The clearer the
terms of public engagement and the more meaningful their involvement, the smoother and
more sustainable and less conflicted the outcome will be.
6.1
stakeholder, therefore, Stakeholder Committees should be formed that are representative of the
affected public. Committee formation must proceed with the full involvement of the potential
stakeholders. To create stakeholder committees that are truly representative of affected
communities and groups requires that the process be participatory and transparent. Committee
membership and representation should not be dictated by outsiders and to give more people an
opportunity to vote and participate as representatives of the people, committee membership
can rotate annually.
There may be difficulty at first in identifying local groups, in selecting stakeholder
representatives and stakeholder committees and in empowering and engaging them in
meaningful ways. Discussing the purpose of such committees with public is important.
Sensitizing them to their rights and to how they can participate is critically important. They
should have a clear understanding of the responsibilities of stakeholder committees, the sorts
of issues committee members may have to deal with and the seriousness of the decisions they
may be called upon to make on behalf of their constituents. If there is difficulty in determining
whom to select and how to organize a committee, it may help to discuss with the people of the
community how they have dealt in the past with other activities requiring representative
decision-making.
Example on a set of questions which proponents may use to identify project
stakeholders is given in the box below.
6.2
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS
Stakeholder involvement begins with the identification of affected communities and
groups, followed by the formation of representative committees, followed by identifying the core
issues arising and followed, in turn, by a concerned effort to involve them easily and equitably
in dealing with the issues, making suggestions and decisions, and taking action. Stakeholder
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
43
Who might be affected, adversely or beneficially, directly or indirectly, sooner or later, by the project
development?
Who are the most vulnerable, the typically voiceless, for whom special efforts may have to be
made?
Who best represents those most likely to be affected?
Who is responsible for what is intended by the project?
Who is likely to mobilize for or against the project?
Who can make what is intended by the project more effective through their participation and support,
or less effective by their non-participation or opposition?
Who must be fully informed and convinced for the project to proceed smoothly and conflict-free?
Who can contribute financial, social and technical resources?
In addition, the following questions should be answered affirmatively:
Have the local communities, households, families, individuals or institutions most seriously affected
by project activities been identified?
Are the members of each community or stakeholder group able to select committee members to
represent them, whom they respect and trust?
Have conflict situations, and persons involved in serious local conflict, been avoided in the selection
process?
Are all sections of the community represented? Is there representative equity? Are the most
vulnerable groups and women involved or well represented?
Are stakeholders satisfied with the selection of their representatives to the stakeholder committees?
Two most intense periods of local stakeholder involvement are at scoping and during
the EIA study. Public inputs during scoping inform the writing of the TOR for EIA. The combined
EIA study should be well informed through public participation. It leads to an EIA report which
guides the impact mitigation process.
6.2.1
Memoranda of Understanding
Experience shows that overlooking commitments made to local people and communities
Make no promises, commitments nor suggest courses of action without authority to do so;
and
Where commitments are realistic, appropriate and authorized, draw up and sign MOUs in
each case, specifying the roles and responsibilities of all concerned and affected parties.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
44
6.2.2
Training
Some projects have demonstrated that training programmes for technical and economic
skills development and partnership are quite useful in reducing stakeholder frustrations in the
face of changes which development inevitably bring to project-impacted communities. Priority
should be given to preparing community members by enabling them to take up local
employment opportunities. Training in skill-upgrading and other specialized employment pay off
for proponent and local people alike by helping to meet the increased skilled manpower needs
created by hydropower and other development projects. Similarly, training in other economic
opportunities (e.g. fruit and vegetable production, poultry farming, animal husbandry) are also
highly useful to farmers. Some of these activities should be the responsibility of local service
agencies of the government working in close association with the proponent/developer.
NGOs/CBOs can also help in this regard.
The training of project affected people, women and men, in new skills is an effective
strategy only if accompanied by actual employment resulting from firm market demand for new
skills, or from new investments. The market for skills development should be carefully assessed
before setting up training programmes. It is recommended that as new jobs open up that at
least one person per household be employed by the project, to increase and spread local
benefits and to enhance local support and well-being.
6.2.3
User Groups
Stakeholders will inevitably include members of existing community resource user
groups. In fact, the stakeholder group is, itself, a kind of user group focussed on both
environmental and human resource impacts associated with hydropower projects.
It is important to aid stakeholders in the formation or strengthening of user groups, to
assume their smooth functioning and sustainability. It is equally important to encourage local
government services agencies and NGOs, in their rural development roles. Key points about
user groups development traditions and experiences can be learned by examining longstanding forest user groups, water user groups, and other pre-existing resource management
groups.
6.3
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
MoEF (Govt. of India) has specified guidelines for public consultation. Purpose is to
ascertain the concerns of local affected persons and other persons who have plausible stake in
the environmental impacts of the project. Public consultation is required for all Category A and
Category B1 projects (see section 2). Public consultation has two components:
(a) a public hearing at the site or in its close proximity for ascertaining concerns of local
affected persons
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
45
(b) obtain responses in writing from other concerned persons having a plausible stake in
environmental impacts of the project or activity.
A notice for environmental public hearing is issued by the State Pollution Control Board
(SPCB) in at least two newspapers widely circulated in the region around the project, one of
which shall be in the vernacular language of the locality concerned. Date, time and place of
public hearing shall be mentioned clearly by the State Pollution Control Board. Public can
submit its suggestions, views, comments and objections within 30 days from the date of
publication of the notification.
The participation in public hearing is open to the bonafide residents, environmental
groups
and
other
located
at
the
project
sites
likely
to
be
affected.
Written
suggestions/representations can also be made by the public to the concerned State Pollution
Control Board. SPCB shall arrange to video film the entire proceedings
The composition of Public Hearing Panel consists of the following:
(i) District Magistrate or his nominee (not below rank of ADM) Chairman
(ii) Representative of the State Pollution Control Board
The concerned persons are provided access to the draft EIA report and summary EIA
report at the following places. Summary EIA report shall also be placed on website of SPCB.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Office of the concerned State Pollution Control Board and its concerned regional office
v.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
46
SECTION 7
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
Environmental monitoring is one of the most important components of an EIA. It is
essential for:
Checking the implementation of mitigation measures in the manner described in the EIA
report;
7.1.1
Principles of Monitoring
Certain principles of EIA monitoring should be considered, and not overlooked. If the
7.1.2
Types of Monitoring
Various types of monitoring activities are currently in practice, each of which is relevant
Baseline monitoring
A survey should be conducted on basic environmental parameters in the area
surrounding the proposed project before construction begins (Pre-Audit Study). Subsequent
monitoring can assess the changes in those parameters over time, against the baseline.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
47
(b)
Impact monitoring
Impact monitoring is designed to identify and measure changes in environmental
variables. Environmental noise should be separated from trend as shown in Figure 7.1.
The physical, biological and socio-economic and cultural parameters within the project
area must be measured during the period of project construction and operation in order to
detect environmental changes which may have occurred as a result of project implementation.
Compliance monitoring
This form of monitoring employs a periodic sampling method, or a continuous recording
of specific environmental quality indicators or pollution levels, to ensure project compliance with
recommended environmental protection standards.
Monitoring should be regular and performed long-term. Interruptions in monitoring may
result in having insufficient data to draw accurate conclusions concerning project impacts.
The main aim of EIA compliance monitoring is to provide the information required to
ensure that project implementation has the least possible negative environmental impacts, and
all possible positive impacts, in the project affected area.
7.1.3
Intensity of Monitoring
It is not possible to monitor every single one of parameters that were investigated during
the impact identification process. Therefore, a selection of Scoping Out should therefore be
made of the most important and critical parameters that will best reflect the impacts of the
project on its surrounding environment.
The level or intensity of monitoring is to be determined on the basis of the known
variability of each parameter, together with the potential severity of the environmental impacts
that are being monitored.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
48
7.1.4
measured during project construction should be developed. The indicators selected should
reflect the condition of that particular component upon the measurement.
7.2
ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING
The term Audit is usually associated with the professional of finance and accounting.
Auditing refers to the examination and assessment of a certain type of performance. In the case
of an EIA, an audit should assess the actual environmental impact, the accuracy of prediction,
the effectiveness of environmental impact mitigation and enhancement measures, and the
functioning of monitoring mechanisms.
7.2.1
Types of Audit
The following types of audit are recommended for different aspects of the EIA process:
(a)
Decision point audit: It examines the effectiveness of EIA as a decision making tool.
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Predictive technique audit: It examines the accuracy and utility of predictive techniques by
comprising actual against predicted environmental effects.
(f)
EIA procedures audit: It critically examines the methods and approach adopted during the
EIA study
Audits are not required in all cases. At the project approval stage, however, both the
project proponent and the authorizing agency should consider whether the application of a
particular auditing technique is likely to result in new information or an improvement in
management practices. Particular attention should be given to the cost-effectiveness of any
proposed audit and to the technical difficulties likely to be encountered.
Environmental auditing should compare monitoring results with data generated during
the pre-project period. Comparisons can be made with similar projects or against standard
norms. Relating actual impacts with predicted impacts will help in evaluating the accuracy and
adequacy of EIA.
7.3
49
mitigation measures and the verification of predicted impacts in the project cycle. The following
are general procedures for the implementation of monitoring and auditing plans on
development projects.
7.3.1
during the construction and operation of the project to examine the effectiveness of the
mitigation measures. The following activities need to be concluded for impact monitoring:
(a) Hold regular meetings with the local people and listen to their concerns to assess the
impacts of the project on the community and the environment
(b) During construction, regularly assess the stability of disrupted slopes. This is particularly
necessary during the monsoon season.
(c) During construction, inspect the levels of air, noise and water and land pollution at regular
intervals and compare with national standards and baseline data.
(d) During and after construction, conduct regular fish sampling to assess impact of the project
on the fish population and their spawning and migratory behaviour.
(e) With the help of the forest user groups, regularly monitor the condition of the local forest,
and the use and trafficking of forest products.
(f) Monitor the spoil disposal practices.
(g) Monitor storage techniques for fuel and explosives kept in the project area to ensure safety
to people and the environment.
(h) Check the water supply and sanitation situation in the labour camps and the construction
areas, and regularly test the quality of water being supplied to the construction workers.
(i) Regularly check the health of the workers to ensure that there is no spread of
communicable diseases. Also, regularly check the construction safely, ensuring the
maintained health of the workers.
(j) With the help of the local police, monitor, monitor the occurrence of criminal and socially
undesirable activities.
(k) Monitor the gender issues related to the project to ensure that neither males nor females
bear an unfare share of negative impacts.
(l) For at least three years following land acquisition, regularly survey the social and economic
conditions of displaced families whose land and properties have been acquired by the
project.
7.3.2
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
50
The monitoring plan includes the description of types of monitoring, the parameters to
be monitored and methods to be used and schedules for operating monitoring activities. The
following example (Table 7.1) illustrates the formulation of monitoring plan.
Indicators
Method
Location
Schedule
Physical environment
Slopes
Degree of slopes, stability of Site observation
Near
unstable Continuously
slopes, changes from the
slope areas
during
baseline data
construction
Water quality Temperature, pH, turbidity, Water sampling and See: Water Quality See: Water Quality
TSS,
DSS,
hardness, testing,
and Aspects
Aspects
chloride, sodium, oil and comparison to ambient
grease, coliform, DO, BOD, standards
COD, P, S, Chlorophyll
Air quality
Total
suspended
solid Low-volume sampler, In and around Continuous
particulate, SO2, CO2, NO2, visual
inspection, construction sites observation
and
PbO2, dust accumulation measurement,
and and along access sampling
during
from construction activities comparison of data roads
construction
with ambient standards
Biological environment
Fisheries
Size of fish population, Fish sampling and Upstream
and At
least
three
changes in spawning and discussions with local downstream
of times
a
year:
migratory habits
fisherman
project site
before, during and
after monsoon
Forest
and Number of trees, health of Discussions with user In/around
Twice
a
year
vegetation
trees, presence of ground groups, local people construction
during
cover
and the District Forest sites/camps,
construction
Office, field observation access
roads,
markets
Socio-Economic and Cultural Environment
Water supply Presence and quality of Site observation, water Affected
VDCs Continuously
and sanitation water supply in local homes testing and interviews and construction during
in the project and construction areas, with local people
camps
construction
area
adequacy
of
sewerage
system
Public health Types of diseases and Discussions with the Affected
VDCs Monthly
during
amount of disease in the local people and the and construction construction
project area and local health professionals at camps
community
the
local
health
post/hospital
Resettlement Social
and
economic Discussions with the Resettlement
Regularly for at
and
conditions of the displaced displaced
people, site(s)
least three years
Rehabilitation people
observation
following
land
acquisition
Economy
Number of local people Records kept by project Project site
Twice
a
year
employed by project
management
during and after
construction
Infrastructure Number
of
households Records kept by project Affected VDCs
Two years after
included
in
rural management
project completion
electrification by project
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
51
7.3.3
Information from monitoring output should also be utilized for carrying out the environmental
audit. In general terms the environmental audit should gather information on the following
areas:
Whether the impacts forecast by the EIA occurred and, if so, the extent of these impacts
Whether or not mitigation measures implemented are effective to control adverse impacts or
enhance beneficial impacts
Whether or not all landscapes degraded due to project implementation have been restored
to their original (or better) conditions
What are the impacts of boom-bust scenario among the workforce involved in project
implementation and the local economy
How have the environmental conditions changed from the baseline conditions?
Are there any problems relating to slope stability in the project area?
Have slope stability and erosion control measures adopted by the project been effective in
minimizing slope instability, erosion and landslides?
What is the quality of water in the river and its tributaries? Did it change significantly from
the baseline condition?
Are there any bare or degraded areas around the project? What is the condition of the
quarry sites, borrow areas and the spoil disposal areas?
How are the families resettled by the project adapting to their new host communities?
How have the local construction workers adapted to the loss of their jobs following the end
of construction activities?
What has been the impact of the project on local and national economy?
7.3.4
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
52
Location
Weir,
access
road,
power
house
and
construction
plant areas
Methods
Low-volume
sampler,
visual
inspection,
measurement and
their comparison
with
ambient
standards
Sources
Analysis
of
data,
information
from
local
people,
observation
Methods
Decibel
meter
Sources
Measurement
and information
from local people
Interview,
observation
Local
people,
observation
Methods
Sources
Water
samples Analytical
collected
from data
different source and
comparisons
with
baseline data and
ambient water quality
Sources
Local
people
and
observation
Local
people
and
observation
Sources
Local
information,
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
54
Plantation
disrupted
slopes
natural
slopes,
collected data
Adequate drainage
facilities such as
catch
drains,
herringbone drains,
side
drains,
number
of
disturbed
areas
due to the lack of
drainage
of Revegetation
of
disturbed slopes
Power
house, Observation
intake, roads and and
mostly in unstable photographs
areas
photographs,
observation
Local
information,
observation
Local
information,
observation
Alternative energy
for cooking for
labour force
Harvesting
and
trade of medicinal
plants
Indicators
Number of new
houses
in
the
project
area,
number of tea stalls
and
restaurants
established during
construction
Volume
of
fuel
wood
trade,
location of timber
depots and fire
wood sale in the
project construction
area
Number of stumps
of cut trees in
nearby forest
Volume and type of
fuel used in the
project area
Sales of medical
herbs increased
Location
Methods
Project
site, Counting,
roadside
and observation
the vicinity of and record
project area
Sources
Local
people
and,
observation
Project
site, Records,
markets
and observation
settlement
areas
Local people,
available
information,
observation
Forest
nearby
Local people,
observation
area Examination
of forest
Project sites
Records from
the
contractors
Project
sites Information
and markets
from
local
people
and
market
Physical condition General condition Forest
near Observation
of forest
of forest nearby
project site
Local people,
observation
Local people
Information
and available
local people
(ii) Wildlife
Parameter
Wildlife
Indicators
Location
Methods
Sources
Wildlife hunting, trapping Forest
area Interview with Local people,
and poaching by workforce
near
the local people observation
project site
and
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
55
photographs
Trading of wildlife products Project
site Observation,
Local people,
(dried meat, hides, furs)
and markets
interview and observation
photographs
Frequency of the birds and Project area
Observation,
Local people
mammals seen in the
interview
project site before and after
the project
(iii) Fisheries
Parameter
Indicators
Fisheries
Species
of
fish
occurrence
as
compared with preproject levels
Fishing activities of
workforce
Use of explosives,
electric rod and nets
Location
Methods
Sampling stations at Sampling
the project sites
Sources
Local
fisherman
Project site
Interview
Local people
Project site
Interview
Local people
Indicators
Location
Number
of
local Project site
labourers employed in
the
Project
Construction
Number of women in Project sites
workforce
Methods
Sources
Analysis of Records
from
records,
contractor and local
interview
people
Records
Local
people,
records of contractor
Location
Methods
Roadsides and Records,
in project sites
interview
Sources
Records, local
people
Observation
and
local
people
Local people
Records,
interview
Inquiries,
interview
Local tenants
and
local
people
(iii) Compensation
Parameter
Compensation
Indicators
Location
Methods
Sources
Use of compensation Local area/out Survey
and Local people
received
of the area
interview
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
56
Location
Project sites
Methods
Records,
interview
Sources
Records
from
contractors and
local people
Project sites
Records,
interview
Records
from
contractors and
local people
Project sites
Records,
interview
Records of office
and local people
Project sites
Records,
interview
Records
of
contractors, office
of
project
management and
local people
Location
Project
sites
and
its
vicinities
Within the
periphery of
project area
Methods
Survey,
interview and
observation
Survey,
interview and
observation
Sources
Local
people,
observation,
records
Concerned
agencies,
local
people
Project area
Records,
interview
Project sites
and its
vicinities
Records,
interview
Concerned
agencies, project
management office
and local people
Local people and
project
management office
Location
Project
area/VDCs
Methods
Interview/survey,
observation
Project
area/VDCs
Interview/survey,
observation
Market survey
Sources
Farmers and local
entrepreneurs,
observation
Local
people,
business
community,
observation
Local
people,
shop keepers
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
57
SECTION 8
PREPARATION OF TERMS OF REFERENCES
As per guidelines of MoEF, Govt. of India, terms of references for EIA are required for
B1 and A category of projects. The TOR are to be submitted along with information in Form 1.
These are finalized by Environmental Appraisal Committee and conveyed to the project
proponent. In case the TOR are not finalized and conveyed within 60 days, the TOR suggested
by proponent shall be deemed as final.
8.1
submitted to the authorizing agency for approval. The basic objectives of the TOR are to:
ensure that the resulting EIA will be suitable for review and evaluation by the concerned
governmental agencies. The TOR provides specific guidelines, including:
fitting the EIA study into the context of existing policies, rules and administrative
procedures,
clarification of the responsibilities of the different institutional actors involved in the project
cycle,
setting out a time frame, with the required expert manpower for carrying out the EIA study,
together with the estimated budget required
technical guidance relating to the main aspects of the environment which will require
delineation during the EIA study.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
58
8.1.1
results of scoping. The most appropriate time for preparation of TOR is at the feasibility stage of
the project cycle.
8.1.2
the scoping exercise, to be carried out in EIA study, should be included in the TOR. The project
proponent should prepare a TOR that both delineates the scope of the EIA and provides
complete guidance for undertaking the EIA study. After approval from the authorizing agencies
the TOR becomes an official document. In the EIA report review process, the TOR serves as a
standard document against which the subject matter covered in the EIA report will be
evaluated.
8.2
follows the EIA format. The proponent should always bear in mind that the purpose of the TOR
is to answer the following questions:
8.2.1
organization that will be responsible for carrying out the EIA. The information given will be used
by the concerned agencies to evaluate the institutional capabilities for carrying out the EIA. The
information should at least include:
the name of organization, address and contact numbers (telephone, fax, e-mail, website);
8.2.2
results to project planning, design and implementation. It should highlight critical points in the
decision making process linking environmental and social assessment and project execution.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
59
The concerned agencies will require descriptions of the construction and operational
phases of the proposed project. Based on the information already provided in the scoping
document, these should include the projects:
land requirements,
raw materials,
construction activities,
schedule,
staffing,
Data Required for Preparation of EIA Report and Methodology of Data Collection
The evaluation of the effects of hydropower on the environment and socio-economy
requires adequate knowledge of the ecosystems, including the human communities, which exist
within the area under influence of the project. Keep the data collection well focused. Based on
the issues identified in the scoping document, this section should summarize what baseline
data and information are needed, describe how they will be gathered, and explain how they will
be used. The study goals must be clearly defined.
The methodologies to be used for data collection should be briefly described, together
with an explanation of how precise the information needs to be for decision-making. Predictive,
quantitative models and standards should be proposed wherever possible to avoid vague and
subjective predictions. In addition, public involvement to focus the analysis on locally important
concerns and issues, and to ensure peoples participation, should be employed.
8.2.4
out the EIA is familiar with all of the relevant legislation of India. A summary should be made of
the guidelines, procedural aspects, acts, rules, regulations and policies. Particular emphasis
should be given to the policies and legal framework for sensitive issues such as pollution
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
60
standards, protected areas, endangered species, criteria for impact evaluation and relocation
and compensation for project affected people.
8.2.5
8.2.5.1 Time
By means of appropriate bar graph and simple critical path chart, the proposed plan for
carrying out the EIA study should be indicated so that the project will be completed within a
realistic time period. The graph or chart should indicate which studies are seasonally
dependent, and the time frame must match the activities to be carried out.
8.2.5.2 Estimated budget
The total cost of the proposed EIA study should be given, together with estimates of the
probable costs for any resulting Resettlement Plan, Mitigation Plan, Monitoring Plan, Auditing
Plan, and Environmental Management Plan. Roughly, total cost for environmental integration in
the project implementation can be expected to be in the range of 1% to 5% of the total cost of
project construction which should be borne by the project proponent.
Also to be included in the budget are the costs required for public involvement during
EIA at sites, public hearings at project site, notices in newspapers and logistic support required
for conducting public hearings.
8.2.5.3 Specialists/Experts
Starting with the team leader, a list of EIA project staff should be given, together with
their key qualifications and affiliations.
A description of proposed team staff should be presented including bio-data for all key
personnel. A single individual should be designated as the EIA Team Leader, to be assigned
full time for the duration of the project. It is most important that the expertise of the project staff
is shown to cover all of the major issues identified in the scoping document. A hydropower
engineer should be involved in the EIA study, as should a social scientist and/or socioeconomist familiar with India.
8.2.6
shall be incorporated.
8.2.7
Physical
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
61
Biological
Socio-economic
The potential impacts to be investigated by the EIA should be classified in terms of
whether they are direct or indirect, and the methods by which the evaluations of their effects will
be made should consider the extent, duration and magnitude of each impact, including
cumulative and residual impacts.
8.2.8
of implementing variations in the design of the proposed project. The proposed methods will be
expected to be capable of evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of both options in
terms of economy and environment. The No Action Option is the existing scenario and
describes status quo condition; whereas, under the condition with proposed project
implementation, some changes are bound to take place.
It is very important to explain here how different stakeholder groups will be incorporated
into the consideration of alternatives such as:
design;
project site;
acceptability or otherwise of the risks likely to emerge while implementing the proposal;
and
8.2.9
measures should be summarized and their budgetary requirements should be estimated. The
roles and responsibilities of concerned agencies at the central and local levels of administration
in the implementation of mitigation measures proposed must also be included.
The Environmental Management Plan and Auditing Plan should also be described.
8.2.10 Costs and Benefits
This section must summarize the basic development issues or the problems that will
addressed by the proposed activities. If possible, it should characterize the issues or the
problems in a broader national context. The way in which the proposed project is expeted to
address and resolve issues, or solve or alleviate problems, should be explained, with emphasis
on sustainability. The critical requirements for the proposed activity to be successful in the longterm should be described, with emphasis on the major risks and benefits involved.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
62
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
63
ANNEXURE I
USEFUL REFERENCES
Manuals
MoEF. 2001. Environmental Impact Assessment A Manual, Impact Assessment Division,
Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Preparing Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for Hydropower
Projects. Department of Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Preparing Scoping Document for Environmental Impact Assessment
of Hydropower Projects. Department of Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Preparing Terms of References (TOR) for Environmental Impact
Assessment of Hydropower Projects, with Notes on EIA Report Preparation. Department
of Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Reviewing Scoping Document, Terms of References (TOR) and
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Reports for Hydropower Projects. Department of
Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Preparing Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report for
Hydropower Projects. Department of Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Public Involvement in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Process of Hydropower Projects. Department of Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Developing and Reviewing Water Quality Monitoring Plans and
Results for Hydropower Projects. Department of Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
DOED. 2002. Manual for Predicting, Rating, Ranking and Determination of Significant Impacts
in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Hydropower Projects. Department of
Electricity Development, Kathmandu.
Acts
MoEF. 1996. Environmental Protection Act, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government
of India.
MoEF. 1974 (amended in 1978 & 1988. Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 amended in 1988.
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1981 amended in 1988.
Notifications
MoEF. 2006. Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006 of Ministry of Environment
and Forests (MoEF), Government of India.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
64
Guidelines
MoEF. 1981. Guidelines for River Valley Projects, Ministry of Environmental & Forests,
Government of India.
Guidelines for Sustainable Water Resources Development and Management, 1992, CWC
National Guidance Manual on Environmental Impact Assessment, 2003, NEERI on behalf of
MoEF
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
65
ANNEXURE II
DEFINITION OF TERMS RELATED TO SOIL, AIR AND WATER
ENVIRONMENT OF A HYDROPOWER PROJECT
Abatement
Accretion
The process of growth whereby material is added to the outside of non-living matter,
the gradual increase in flow of stream due to influent seepage.
Acid
Capable of donating hydrogen ions. Solutions of acids have a sour taste. Changes
the colour of litmus paper from blue to red, and neutralizes bases.
Acid rain
Rain that has become a weak acid solution because it has combined with sulphur
dioxide from coal fired generating stations, non ferrous ore smelters and with nitrous
oxide emissions from vehicles and fuel combustion.
Acidity of Water
Adaption
Aeration
Aerobic
(Oxybiotic)
Aerosol
Particulate matter in the form of dust, fumes or mist that can remain suspended in the
air for long periods of time; usually under 1 micron in diameter.
Afforestation
To establish a forest by artificial means on an area from which forest vegetation has
always or long been absent.
Aqua
Water related
Air Pollution
The presence of substances in the air that adversely affect humans, animals,
vegetation or materials.
Algae
Alkaline Water
Water which is high in sodium percentage but relatively low in total dissolved salts.
Ambient
Anaerobe
Annual Flood
Aquaculture
The use of artificial means to increase the production of aquatic organisms in fresh or
salt water.
Aquatic
Arable
Land suitable for cultivation by ploughing or tillage, does not require clearing or other
modification
Artificial Recharge Augmenting of the natural replenishment of ground water storage by some method
Base Flow
The sustained or dry weather flow of streams resulting from the outflow of permanent
or perched groundwater and that draining from the V large lakes and swamps. Also,
water from glaciers, snow and all other possible sources not resulting from direct
runoff.
Bedload
The load of bed material layer where suspension is impossible for fluid dynamic
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
66
reasons.
Benthos
Organisms living in or on the bottom of a water body. Littoral organisms live between
0 to 200 m deep, and deep water organisms at 200+ m deep.
Biochemical
Represents the amount of dissolved oxygen that will be required from water during
the bacterial assimilation of organic pollutants. The difference in oxygen
concentration of a water sample after five days of incubation at 200C/3 days of
incubation at 270C.
Demand (BOD)
Biodegradable
Can be broken down to simple inorganic substances by the action of bacteria or fungi
Biological diversity The number of kinds of organisms per unit area or volume; the composition of
species in a given area at a given time.
Biological
Indicator
Biological Waste
Biota
Catchment Area
Channel
A natural or artificial watercourse of perceptible extent with a definite bed and banks
to confine and conduct continuously or periodically flowing water
Check dam
A small dam designed to retard the flow of water and sediment in a channel used
especially to control soil erosion.
Chemical Oxygen A measure of the oxygen equivalent which is required for the oxidation of an
Demand (COD)
organically polluted water supply.
Coliform,
Coliform
Faecal Bacteria found in human and animal faeces. A high coliform count indicates potential
contamination of a water supply by human waste and the potential to cause disease.
Conjunctive use
Conjunctive use involves the coordinated and planned use of both surface water and
ground water resources to meet water requirements.
Consumptive use The quantity of water used by vegetative growth of a given area in transpiration and
or
building of plant tissue and that evaporated from the adjacent soil or from intercepted
Evapotranspiration precipitation on the area in any specified time. It is expressed in water depths units or
depths area units per unit area and for specified periods such as days, months and
seasons.
Dam
A barrier constructed across a river or natural water course for the purpose of:
(a) Impounding water or creating reservoir
(b) Diverting water there from into a conduit or channel fro power generation
(c) Creating a head which can be used for power generation
(d) Improving river navigability
(e) Retention of debris
(f) Flood control
(g) Domestic, municipal and industrial uses
(h) Preservation of wildlife and pisciculture
(i) Recreation
Dead Storage
Deforestation
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
67
Detention Dam
A dam built to store streamflow or surface runoff and to control the release of such
stored water.
Dissolved Oxygen Amount of oxygen needed for the respiration of the microorganisms responsible for
(DO)
aerobic decomposition of organic matter and for plants that are engaged in
resynthesizing organic matter
Dissolved Solids
The total amount of dissolved material, organic and inorganic, contained in water and
waste water
Drawdown
The reduction in static head within the aquifer resulting from abstraction
Ecology
That branch of the biological sciences which deals with the relationship between
organisms and their environment
Ecosystem
A complex system composed of a community of fauna and flora taking into account
the chemical and physical environment with which the system is interrelated.
Environmental
Auditor
Environmental
Criteria
Standards of physical, chemical and biological components that define a given quality
of an environment.
Environmental
Impact
Environmental
Impact
Assessment
Environmental
Parameters
Physical, chemical or biological components and their interactions that can be stated
in quantitative terms.
Environmental
Standards
Standards set to protect mans health and well being, to protect human health,
environmental sustainability and aesthetics, and the well being of plant and animal
life.
Eutrophication
Fallow
Fauna
All animal life associated with a given habitat, country, area or period.
Flood Plain
(a) It includes the water channel, the flood channel and that area of nearby low land
susceptible to flood by inundation.
(b) Adjoining land at the bottom of a valley of a stream flooded only when the stream
flow exceeds the bankful discharge.
Flora
All plant life associated with a given habitat, country or period. Bacteria are
considered flora.
Flow
Baseflow
The portion of the stream discharge that is derived from natural storage.
Enhancement
An improvement of flow that results in better stream conditions for aquatic, terrestrial
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
68
Flow
Interstitial Flow
The portion of surface water that infiltrates the stream bed and moves through pores
in the subsurface.
Minimum Flow
Negotiated lowest flow in a regulated stream that will sustain an aquatic population of
agreed upon levels. This flow may vary seasonally.
Return Flow
That portion of water previously diverted from a stream and subsequently returned to
that stream or to another body of ground or surface water.
Fossil Fuels
Coal, oil and natural gas. Remains of ancient plant and animal life consumed to
produce energy.
Greenhouse Effect The increase in concentration of carbon dioxide and other gases in the earths
atmosphere, causing a change in the ration of incoming solar energy to ongoing
radiations, potentially warming the earth.
Habitat
Heavy Metals
Metals with a density greater than 5 g/cc are known as heavy metals.
Hydroelectric
Plant
Hydrograph
A graph showing for a given point in a stream the discharge, stage, velocity or other
property of water with respect of time.
Hydrologic Cycle
(a) The cycle of water movement from the atmosphere to the earth by precipitation
and its return to the atmosphere by interception, evaporation, runoff, infiltration,
percolation, storage and transpiration.
(b) The continuous circulation of water from the atmosphere through soil to ocean
(inter-relationships between precipitation, evaporation, ground water supplies,
and water in general)
In situ
Interception
Invertebrates
Irrigation
Land Drainage
Land Reclamation Making land capable of more intensive use by changing its general characters, as by
drainage of excessively wet land; irrigation of arid or semi arid land; or recovery of
submergence land from seas, lakes, and rivers.
Limnology
Macrophytes
Mitigate
Monitoring
Programme
Non-point
Pollution
Pollutants whose sources can not be pinpointed. Pollutants from a widespread area.
Oligotrophic
Referring to a water body low in nutrient supplies. Such water bodies contain little
organic matter, have a high dissolved oxygen level and low numbers of aquatic
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
69
organisms.
Particulate Matter
(a) The most prevalent atmospheric pollutant is suspended particulate matter. Most
particulate measuring devices are designed to measure the range between 1 to
10 micrometres. Large particles settle out of the air. However, the smaller
particles (less than 1 micrometre) are readily respirable contributing significantly
to respiratory disease and reducing visibility.
(b) Any material, except water in uncombined form, that is or has been airborne and
exists as a liquid or a solid at standard conditions.
Pediments
Areas along the face of the uplifted mountain ranges which are relatively gently
sloping and which have been formed by several factors including sheet erosion and
deposition, stream braiding etc. The general slope of these areas is governed by the
slope and erodibility of the underlying bedrock formations.
pH
(a) At a given temperature the intensity of the acidic or basic character of a solution.
(b) pH is defined as coefficient extinction of hydrogen ions at a given temperature.
(c) Negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration in solution.
Pollution
Potential
The amount of water that could pass into the atmosphere by evapotranspiration if the
Evapotranspiration amount of soil water were not a limiting factor.
Pristine State
Rain Forest
Remote Sensing
Resource
Resource
Conservation
Reduction of the amounts of solid waste that are generated, reduction of overall
resource consumption and utilization of recovered resources.
Resource
Management
Retention Dams
Small earthen dams designed to retain water for only short periods of time to prevent
excessively rapid runoff and erosion.
Riverine
Salinisation
Sanctuary
An area usually set aside by legislation or deed to observe restriction for the
preservation and protection of organisms.
Sediment
Usually finely divided organic and/or mineral matter deposited by air or water in nonturbulent areas.
Soil Texture
Refers to the relative proportions of the various size groups (sand, silt and clay) of
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
70
Spillway
Spring
Stability
(Ecological)
Stream
Restoration
Undergrowth
Collectively, the shrubs, sprouts, seedlings and sapling trees and all herbaceous
plants in a forest.
Water
Criteria
Watershed
The entire drainage area that contributes water to a system; the line of separation
between adjacent water catchment areas.
Wildlife
Wildlife Habitat
Zooplankton
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
71
ANNEXURE III
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS PRESCRIBED BY CENTRAL
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
Time
Concentration in
g/m3
Industrial
Residential,
area
rural & other
areas
Annual Avg.
24 Hours
Annual Avg.
24 Hours
Annual Avg.
24 Hours
Sensitive
area
80 120
60 80
15 30
80 120
60 80
15 30
360 500
140 200
70 100
120 150
60 100
50 75
1.0 1.5
0.75 1.00
0.50 0.75
5000 10000
2000 4000
1000 2000
Industrial
Commercial
Residential
Silence Zone **
Day *
75
65
55
50
LEQ in db(a)
Night
70
55
45
40
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
72
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
73
500*
5000*
10
250
400
20
300
-
300
600
400
50
600
26
2
1000
-
1.2
1000
2250
0.05
0.3
1.5
0.1
1.5
1.5
0.5
500
0.2
1.5
-
0.2
50
1.5
0.1
1.5
1.5
1500
2100
300
100
250
0.05
600
0.05
0.05
600
-
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
74
ANNEXURE IV
FORMAT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSENT DOCUMENT
(Source: Environmental Impact Assessement Notification 2006 of MoEF, Govt. Of India)
S.NO
1.
EIA STRUCTURE
Introduction
CONTENTS
Purpose of the report
Identification of project & project proponent
Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and
its importance to the country, region
Scope of the study details of regulatory scoping carried out
(As per Terms of Reference)
2.
Project
Description
3.
4.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
75
5.
Analysis
Alternatives
(Technology
& Site)
6.
Environmental
Monitoring
Program
7.
Additional Studies
8.
Project Benefits
9.
Environmental
Cost
Benefit
Analysis
EMP
Description of the administrative aspects of ensuring that
mitigative measures are implemented and their effectiveness
monitored, after approval of the EIA
Summary
& Overall justification for implementation of the project
Conclusion
Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated
(This will constitute
the summary of the
EIA Report )
Disclosure
of The names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume
Consultants
and nature of Consultancy rendered
engaged
10.
11
12.
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
76
ANNEXURE V
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL QUESTIONNAIRE AS PRESCRIBED IN
APPENDIX I FORM I OF EIA NOTIFICATION (MOEF, 2006)
Basic Information
Name of the Project:
Location / site alternatives under consideration:
Size of the Project: *
Expected cost of the project:
Contact Information:
Screening Category:
Capacity corresponding to sectoral activity (such as production capacity for
manufacturing, mining lease area and production capacity for mineral
production, area for mineral exploration, length for linear transport
infrastructure, generation capacity for power generation etc.,)
Activity
1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions,
which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes
in water bodies, etc.)
S.No.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
1.11
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.20
Information/Checklist confirmation
Permanent or temporary change in land use, land cover or
topography including increase in intensity of land use (with
respect to local land use plan)
Clearance of existing land, vegetation and buildings?
Creation of new land uses?
Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore houses, soil testing?
Construction works?
Demolition works?
Temporary sites used for construction works or
housing of construction workers?
Above ground buildings, structures or earthworks including
linear structures, cut and fill or excavations
Underground works including mining or tunneling?
Reclamation works?
Dredging?
Offshore structures?
Production and manufacturing processes?
Facilities for storage of goods or materials?
Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid waste or liquid
effluents?
Facilities for long term housing of operational workers?
New road, rail or sea traffic during construction or operation?
New road, rail, air waterborne or other transport infrastructure
including new or altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc?
Closure or diversion of existing transport routes or infrastructure
leading to changes in traffic movements?
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
77
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.29
1.30
1.31
2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water,
materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply):
Details thereof (with approximate
S.No.
Information/checklist confirmation
Yes/No
2.1
2.2
2.3
Minerals (MT)
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
thereof
approximate
S.No.
Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No
(with
quantities/rates,
3.1
3.2
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
78
3.3
3.4
3.5
thereof
approximate
S.No.
Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No
(with
quantities/rates,
4.1
4.2
4.3
wastes)
Management
Rules)
4.4
4.5
Surplus product
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
treatment
4.10
Agricultural wastes
4.11
S.No.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No
Details
thereof
(with
approximate quantities/rates,
wherever possible) with source
of information data
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
79
S.No.
6.1
Information/Checklist confirmation
Details
thereof
(with
approximate quantities/rates,
wherever possible) with source
of information data with source
of information data
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
7. Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground
or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea:
Details
thereof
approximate
S.No.
Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No
(with
quantities/rates,
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
8.
S.No.
8.1
8.2
8.3
sources?
Information/Checklist confirmation
Yes/No
Details
thereof
(with
approximate quantities/rates,
wherever possible) with source
of information data
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
80
Information/Checklist confirmation
9.1
housing development
extractive industries
supply industries
other
Lead to after-use of the site, which could havean impact on the
environment
Set a precedent for later developments
Have cumulative effects due to proximity to other existing or
planned projects with similar effect
9.2
9.3
9.4
Yes/No
Details
thereof
(with
approximate quantities/rates,
wherever possible) with source
of information data
Environmental Sensitivity
S.No.
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Areas
Name/
Identity
AHEC/MNRE/SHPStandards/E&MWorksGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentforSmallHydropowerProjects
81