Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Introduction
The world that rose from the ashes after World War II faced great
challenges to staunch the blood and suffering of millions of people. One of
them was to lay the foundations for a new way of understanding relations
between peoples in order to avoid what had happened twice already. Hand
in hand with international organizations, some international agreements
were reached and crystallised with the Charter of the United Nations in
1945, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, for
instance. In some way, those documents constituted the germ of policies to
fight discrimination, racism and xenophobia, which are the main focus of
this article.
As a consequence of those policies, some mechanisms of control and
supervision to put an end to violation of the rights of some specific groups
of society have been developed in Europe, both by public and private
institutions, such as companies, the media, etc. For example, the European
Observatory for Racism and Xenophobia; and the European Commission
against Racism and Intolerance were created to that end. In constitutional
treaties and Community laws and Directives, the European Union (EU)
stresses the struggle against all forms of discrimination of both European
and non-European citizens within its institutions.
239
In fact, the European Union has made clear efforts to establish formal
and judicial mechanisms against racism, xenophobia and discrimination
based on gender, age or ethnic or cultural origin. One of the most efficient
mechanisms is prevention. This means, basically, informing, educating
and raising public awareness. School education of children and, therefore,
their families, is the public sphere with the greatest responsibility for this
task. Also, the mass media have a crucial role in implementing that triple
task.
The concern for non-discrimination of minorities in the media can be
also traced back to the post-World War II period. It was then, when the
western world realized the great power that the control of information
provided. As we know, totalitarian regimes of all political wings used the
media as a very effective tool to manipulate public opinion according to
their interests. In order to strengthen the essence of participatory
democracy and the contribution of the media to consolidate western
democracies during the post-war period, the international community
implemented measures with two main objectives. The first one was to
design instruments to avoid the concentration of media groups. This could
limit the pluralism in any society, especially the views and thoughts of
minorities. The second measure, in parallel with the previous one, was to
implement legal measures to guarantee both freedom of expression when
exercising journalism and the right of all citizens to receive objective
information, ethically committed to the basic principles of peaceful living
and respect to the dignity of each person, group or culture.
We must remember that the media constitute the most important source
of information for regular citizens to know about their social, economic,
political and cultural realities. Therefore, they should be aware of their
important role in shaping public opinion on different issues such as foreign
immigration.
This article is intended to show that efforts made by public institutions
(mainly, political ones) to eradicate racist, xenophobic or discriminatory
attitudes and behaviours are not reflected as expected in the mass media
regarding subjects such as migration, in spite of compulsory codes of
professional ethics and style guides. In fact, the opinions expressed by
citizens regarding this issue are very similar to the information given by
the media.
241
The Royal Decree that includes the basic structure of the new Ministry
now considers the struggle against racial discrimination and xenophobia as
one of the various functions of the General Office for Integration of
Immigrants. This explains why, the Spanish Observatory for Racism and
Xenophobia, together with other bodies, is included within the structure of
this General Office which now has the status of General Under-secretariat,
contrary to the previous Ministry structure.
The most interesting aspect of this Observatory is its scope, especially,
the study of all phenomena related to racism and discrimination, but, since
this body is under the State Secretariat for Immigration and Emigration, it
is highly probable that those studies are almost exclusively related to
immigrant populations. As an example we can mention the report
Evolution of Racism and Xenophobia in Spain, entrusted by the
Secretariat of State to the Observatory. It basically consists in analysing a
survey to measure public opinion on immigration, which reduces the issue
of racism and xenophobia to only one of the groups that may be affected
by these phenomena. This does not mean, however, that the analysis or
data production are of poor quality7 as they are carried out by well-known
professionals and the results are used to support plenty of researches, but
there is a repeated coincidence between racism, xenophobia and immigrants.
Anyway, this inclination to associate migration and issues related to
the struggle against racism and xenophobia, that we link to the fact that the
Observatory is under an administrative body focused, precisely, on
immigration and emigration issues, has been mitigated with the recent
creation of the Council for the Promotion of Equality of Treatment and
Non-Discrimination of Persons Based on Racial or Ethnic Origin by Law
62/2003, dated December 30, regarding Fiscal, Administrative and Social
Measures, even if the composition of this body was not regulated until
2007 and even today it is not very active.
Apart from the aforesaid periodic report on the situation of racism and
xenophobia in Spain which is of core importance because, among other
reasons, it is almost exclusive in the country and it fulfils one of the
Observatorys crucial roles: providing a regular diagnose of the situation
of racism and xenophobia in Spain, there are other critical functions the
Observatory fulfils that we summarize below:
The Observatory manages an Anti-Discrimination Resource Centre
(known as CREADI).
In relation to the previous Resource Centre, the Observatory also
manages a Directory of Institutions interested in anti-racism and antixenophobia issues.
243
The Observatory has supported for several years the RAXEN reports,
published by the Movement against Intolerance.
The Observatory directed the GESDI Project or Gestin de la
Diversidad en el mundo laboral (Management of Diversity at Work).
The Gua para la gestin cultural en entornos profesionales (Guide of
cultural management in the professional environment) (2011) was one
of the results of this project.
Within the framework of the European PROGRESS Programme, the
Observatory implemented a project called Planes de Sensibilizacin:
experiencias de xito en el entorno local (Awareness Plans: Success
Stories on the Local Environment) (ESCI III).
Within the framework of the EU Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
programme (2007-2009) JLS/FRC/2007, the Observatory led the
Trans-national Project: Living Together: European Citizenship
against Racism and Xenophobia. As one of the final products of this
project the Decalogue of European Citizenship against Racism and
Xenophobia published with a comprehensive comparative report
made by each country.
These are some of the many important projects developed or led by the
Spanish Observatory for Racism and Xenophobia. In fact, the list could be
longer but the objective of this article is not presenting a detailed history
of the activities carried out by the Observatory. However, such a list
should include the intense work the Observatory conducts in all subjects
related to training and promotion of codes and good practice regarding the
Media. The Observatory promoted and edited a research on this issue by
Jos Carlos Sendn Gutirrez and Patricia Izquierdo Lzaro (2008).
Moreover, it promoted annual reports on how information about
immigration is addressed in Spain, written by Nicols Lorite Garca and
the research group that he leads, MIGRACOM.
For all the reasons stated above, linking this Observatory and our
concern for the struggle against discrimination through the mass media is
fully justified. Now we deem necessary to focus on those codes that are
being created by professionals of the media with the aim of regulating
everything related to this struggle.
245
247
249
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
ETA. Terrorism
Socio-economic problems
Immigration
Figure 10-1. "What, in your opinion, are the three major problems that currently
exist in Spain?" Source: prepared by the authors on the basis of CIS Barometers.
was (and continues to be) the comparison between the so-called statistical
or administrative reality and the reality of public opinion research" (Cea
D'Ancona and Valls, 2010, 301). The report's authors refer to the question
that was first inserted into the 2009 CIS-OBERAXE survey to learn which
is or are the sources that shape opinion on the migration phenomenon. A
significant percentage (26%) of the answers to the question "In your view,
the opinions people have about immigration are fundamentally influenced
by" point to "the news in the media" (Cea D'Ancona and Valls, 2010,
302).
251
January 1st, 2006. Final Data". The two large headlines in bold at the
beginning of the note read as follows: "The population residing in Spain
reaches 44,708,964 people on January 1st, 2006" and "The number of
foreigners is 4,144,166, which accounts for 9.3% of the total registered".
The first thing that stands out is why, out of all the variables that appear in
the Register and that provide statistical data about the populationsuch as
age, sex, educational level, marital status, etc.the Press Release
highlights first and foremost the number of foreigners. In fact, over 90% of
the six pages of information gathered in the Release refer exclusively to
data on the foreign population (by autonomous communities, municipalities,
by nationality, etc.).
To make matters worse, the second paragraph of the Release reads:
"Between 1st January 2005 and 1st January 2006, the number of Spaniards
registered increased by 186,878 (0.5%), while foreigners increased by
413,556 (11.1%)". This is to say that there are increasingly less of us
Spaniards and increasingly more foreigners, but not just any foreigners.
The "Most numerous nationalities" section includes the following entry:
"The most numerous foreigners are Moroccans (563,012), followed by
Ecuadorians (461,310), Romanians (407,159), UK citizens (274,722) and
Colombians (265,141) [...]."
It is worth calling attention to the term "UK citizens" as opposed to the
mere nationality of the other foreigners mentioned. There are no stylistic
reasons to "break" with the list of the nationalities and speak of "British"
unless, for some reason, there is an intention to stress the idea that "UK
citizens" are not immigrants. Proof of this, beyond naive considerations, is
that the British do not appear on the survey answers. It should not come as
a surprise, then, that most answers to the question of whom Spaniards
think of when it comes to immigrants living in Spain are those identified
as North African (Moroccan, Moorish, Maghrebi, Algerians). The
percentage of answers that follows identifies them as African, subSaharan, black, whose countries are included among the most numerous
in the Press Release. It is conceivable, then, that the persistent reports in
the media about the arrival of people identified as 'black' (Africans and
sub-Saharans) in pateras or cayucos, i.e., small boats often used for illegal
immigration, are feeding those answers.
6. Conclusion
Following the policies to combat racism and discrimination in Europe and
the measures aimed at raising awareness among European citizens,
particularly from the media, it is difficult not to recognize the impact of
253
the latter on their opinion regarding foreign immigration. While there has
been significant progress, especially in the use of negative and/or
discriminatory terms and expressions, as well as in the use of certain
images on television, the fact remains that the most recent studies on the
representation of immigration in the media do not offer very significant
differences from the way in which such representations were made 20
years ago.
Different opinion polls in Spain and other EU countries are not
especially encouraging in regards to the assessment they make of the
diversity represented by citizens (foreigners or not; immigrants or not)
whose image is drawn on the basis of generic traits that highlight their
status as different and their otherness. Successive plans for raising local,
national or supranational awareness and the integration policies that have
been developed in recent years have failed to break the "glass ceiling"
represented by the media as mediators between the immigration reality and
public opinion.
Neither codes of ethics nor good professional practices or style guides
have been able to overcome the information production customs.
Consequently, despite their good intentions and the considerable number
of recommendations they make to the daily practice of ethically committed
journalism regarding the recognition of human dignity, they have failed to
substantially change the format and rhetoric of news, be they about
immigration, domestic violence or any other social phenomena. The
supposed alliance between the first and the fourth power and its role in the
service towards structural changes in society seem more a work of fiction
(and wishful thinking) than reality.
Perhaps the realization of failure lies in having projected onto the
media expectations regarding their role in reducing or eliminating racism
and discrimination that are not justified, either because of its social
function or its operating business logic. Either way, the feeling of
frustration that stems from the alleged failure deserves at least some
consideration, both from the media themselves and all political bodies that
promote legislative initiatives or anti-racism. Perhaps the origin of the
mistake lies in considering the media as promoters of discourses that
reproduce behaviours, attitudes and opinions that exclude or denote the
difference represented by a foreign immigrant. Thus it is seen as fit, by
political bodies that promote the struggle against racism, to involve the
media in that struggle.
In any case, there is one verifiable fact: the development of internal
codes of ethics remains an unfinished task for most of the Spanish media.
Its absence in major private media groups, and especially in radio and
Notes
1. This text is aimed at providing some basis for the relation between the mass
media and racist and xenophobe discourses that we have developed in the project
Discourses on Foreign Nationals in Andalusian Media: Discursive and Visual
Construction of the New Andalusia (Excellence Project of the Government of
Andalusia reference: TIC6517 of 2010 call, head researcher is Professor
Antoln Granados Martnez). The contribution of Lucia Chovancova has been
possible thanks to Introduction to the Research Scholarship, given by the ViceRectors Office for Science and Research (University of Granada).
2. Our observations are based on a monograph written by Blzquez (2000) and an
article by Begoa Zalbidea and Juan Carlos Prez Fuentes (2008). Please, refer to
them for more information on the history of ethics in Spanish mass media.
3. Available at:http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/pdf/cerd.pdf .
4. Available at: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/other/c10411_es.htm.
5. The complete text of the Declaration can be accessed at:
http://www.eycb.coe.int/edupack/fr_68.html.
255
6. See, for example, the Observatory web site where it is stated that it was created
under the dispositions of Article 71 of 4/2000 Organic Law
(http://www.oberaxe.es/quienes/).
7. Reports on the evolution of racism and xenophobia in Spain are drafted by M.
ngeles Cea and Miguel S. Valles and use a national survey conducted by the
Centro de Investigaciones Sociolgicas (CIS)requested by the Ministry of
Labour and Immigrationon the Spanish population about Attitudes towards
discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin (2008 report was based on survey
conducted in 2007) and Attitudes towards immigration (2009 and 2010 reports
were based on surveys conducted in 2008 and 2009, respectively). Before that, in
2005 and 2006, the Observatory had requested a research on Spaniards opinions
about racism and xenophobia (See Manuel Prez Yruelas work included in the
References) to the Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados de Andaluca (IESA)
under the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas (CSIC). Apart from
those reports, Prof. M. ngeles Cea has issued several publications aimed at
measuring racism and xenophobia; we have mentioned the most relevant in the
references. This topic will be further developed in the foregoing pages.
8. By codes of ethics in communications, we mean the group of specific
principles, rules and precepts presented in a logical and systematic manner as
initiative from the information sector to correctly guide their work (Niceto
Blzquez, 2000, 72).
9. It can be seen at http://www.ifj.org/docs/ETHICS-E.DOC
10. Available at:
http://ethicnet.uta.fi/international/international_principles_of_professional_ethics_i
n_journalism
11. Recommendation 1067 (1987) on the cultural dimension of broadcast in
Europe. Available in
http://assembly.coe.int//main.asp?link=http://assembly.coe.int/documents/adoptedt
ext/TA87/erec1067.htm
12. Resolution 1003 (1993) on the ethics of journalism. Can be seen at
http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?link=http://assembly.coe.int/documents/adoptedte
xt/ta93/eres1003.htm#1
13. The Declaraci de principis de la professi periodstica a Catalunya can be
seen at http://www.periodistes.org/documents_codi_deontologic
14. Available athttp://www.comisiondequejas.com/Codigo/Codigo.htm
15. The complete text of this Guide is published at:
http://www.cac.cat/pfw_files/cma/recerca/quaderns_cac/Q12manual_ES.pdf
15. See Nordenstreng (2000) to know more about the history and current situation
of the issue of ethic principles and communication in Europe.
16. Editorial Statutes define internal regulation and participation mechanisms.
They usually establish the framework within which professional relations are
developed, including rights and obligations of information workers and
participation bodies (editorial councils, professional committees).
17. The Editorial Statute published by El Pas can be accessed at
http://elpais.com/diario/1980/06/21/economia/330386406_850215.html
Bibliography
Blzquez, Niceto. 2000. El Desafo tico de la Informacin. Salamanca:
Editorial San Esteban.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1973. Lopinion publique nexiste pas. Les temps
moderns 318: 1292-1309.
Bustamante, Enrique. 1995. The Mass-Media: A Problematic
Modernization. In Spanish cultural studies: an introduction: the
257
259
Discourses on Immigration
in Times of Economic Crisis:
A Critical Perspective
Edited by
Advisory Board
Fabio Abreu (Universidad Autnoma de Santo Domingo)
Rafael Cuesta vila (University Miguel Hernndez)
Gloria Esteban de la Rosa (University of Jan)
Encarnacin Hidalgo Tenorio (University of Granada)
Derek Irwin (University of Nottingham Ningbo China)
Mercedes Jabardo Velasco (University Miguel Hernndez)
Marie Lacroix (University of Montral)
David Levey (University of South Africa)
Suren Naicker (University of South Africa)
Fernando Ramos Lpez (University of Alicante)
Fernando Rubio Alcal (University of Huelva)
Bradley Smith (Macquarie University)
Juan Toribio (Universidad Autnoma de Santo Domingo)
Teun A. van Dijk (Pompeu Fabra University)
Salvador Valera Hernndez (University of Granada)
Francisco Vidal Castro (University of Jan)
Katina Zammit (University of Western Sydney)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
viii
Table of Contents
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
LIST OF TABLES