Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Design
Conversion
and
Reactor Sizing
Outline
+ +
=
Solution
1.5
=
= 0.75
1.0
=
= 1.0
.
=
= .
.
Conversion
Conversion of species A is defined as the number of moles A that have
reacted per mole of A fed into the system:
XA
moles of A reacted
moles of A fed
(1)
XA(max)
In general, for reaction of any complexity we are able to follow conversion of any
substance via stoichiometry. For example, in case of the following reaction:
aA +
bB
cC
dD
b
c
B
C
a
a
d
+
D
a
[2]
moles of A
reacted N A0 X
[3]
=
[4]
=
[5]
()
[6]
()
[7]
Levenspiel* Plot
When we inspect the equations derived above, it is clear that we
have to carry out an integration of the form
against
Conversion
X
* Named after Octave Levenspiel, Oregon State University, who suggested this graphical method first
1.0
Therefore
Levenspiel Plot
Area=
As a result lowest at
Conversion
X
()
1.0
and
= 1
[8]
1
=
=
[9]
Levenspiel Plot
Area=
()
Concentrati
on
Conversion: Example
A liquid phase reaction A + B C + D takes place in a constant volume Batch
Reactor. The initial concentration of A, the limiting reactant, is 7 mol dm-3. The
reaction is non-elementary so that rA= k CA with the specific rate constant k = 0.06
min-1. what is the conversion of A if the reactor has been operational for 30 minutes?
Solution
The reaction is
+ +
Integrating gives
=
=
=
With =
=
=
=
=
=1
= 1
= 1
Therefore
= .
Conversion: Example
A liquid phase reaction A C + D takes place in a constant volume Batch Reactor. The initial
amount of A, the limiting reactant, fed to the reactor is 20 mol. The reaction is elementary so that
rA= k CA with the specific rate constant k = 0.06 min-1.
How long would it take to achieve 90% conversion?
How long would it take to achieve 99 % conversion?
Solution
The reaction is +
Substituting for NA
=
()
=
= 0.06
With =
=
()
1
1
Therefore when XA
=0.9
=
1
1
2.3
min =
min
0.06
1 0.9
0.06
Therefore when XA
=0.99
=
1
1
2.3
min =
min
0.06
1 0.99
0.06
[10]
[11]
Molar flowrate
Molar
of A leaving
= flowrate
the system
of A fed
FA0 C A0 v0
Liquid phase
CAO is given in term of molarity.
Example:
CAO =2 mol/dm3
Gas phase
CAO and FAO can be calculated by the entering temperature and pressure using the
ideal gas law:
PA0V0 N A0 RT0
C A0
PA0 y A0 P0
RT0
RT0
FA0 v0C A0 v0
y A0 P0
RT0
[12]
[13]
[14]
[11]
[16]
[11]
Substituting eq [13] in eq
[18]
[15]
[17]
Conversion: Example
A liquid phase reaction A C + D takes place in a Packed Bed Reactor. The
reaction is elementary so that rA= k CA with the specific rate constant k = 0.005 dm3
min-1 [kg(cat)]-1 . The expected conversion is 80%.
a. Find the mass of the catalyst as a function of the inlet flowrate.
Solution
The reaction is +
For a PBR
Substituting for NA
()
=
Therefore when XA
=0.8
=
= 0.005 ()
With =
=
()
1
1
0.005
1 0.8
=
= 200 1.61
Levenspiel Plot
the ratio.
Area=
()
Conversion
X
1.0
1
=
1
=
[16]
Levenspiel Plot
Area=
Area=
[17]
Levenspiel Plot
Conversion
X
()
1.0
Conversion
X
()
1.0
[18]
0 the volumetric flow rate entering the reactor
0
20 m
20 m
Reactor
Consider the tubular reactor, which is 20 m long and 0.2 m3 in volume. The dashed
line represents 0.2 m3 of fluid directly upstream of the reactor The time it takes for this
volume to enter the reactor completely is the space time. For instance, if the space
time is 5 min, it means that every 5 minutes one reactor volume of feed at specified
conditions is being treated by the reactor.
SV
0
V
so
SV
[19]
SV and are not just the reciprocal parameters since they often refer to different
conditions: to the entrance conditions; SV might be referred to the conditions at
specific location in the reactor
F X
V A0
(rA ) exit
Design equations
[20]
V FA 0
0
V
FA0 X
0 0 (rA ) exit
1
rA
PFR
V FA0
0 0
C A0 X
( rA )exit
[22]
Area=/CA0=X
r
A
1
rA
dX
rA
[21]
dX
0 rA
X
dX
rA
0
C A0
[23]
X
dX
rA
0
Area = /CA0=
1
rA exit
XA
XA
Conversion: Summary
Mole Balance for Different Reactors
Reactor Type
Batch
Differential
N A0
Algebraic
dX
rAV
dt
Integral
t N A0
X A (t )
dX
rAV
FA 0 X
(rA ) exit
C X
A0
( rA )exit
V
CSTR
PFR
FA0 dX
rA
dV
V FA 0
C A0
X out
dX
rA
dX
rA
X in
X out
X in
PBR
FA0 dX
rA
dW
W FA 0
X out
X in
dX
rA
FA0 0 C A0
Lets express conversion from the equation (13):
FA FA0 (1 X )
FA0 FA 0C A0 0C A C A0 C A
FA0
0C A0
C A0
C A0 C A
X
C A0
FA 0 FA
FA 0
dC A
dX
C A0
CSTR
PFR
X
Design equations
C A0 X
( rA )exit
Replace conversion
using its relation with
concentrations
C CA
A0
rA
1
rA
[26]
C A0 C A0 C
rA
C A0
Constant density
only
Area = = C A0 C A
r
dX
rA
0
C A0
[27]
1
dC A
C A0
rA
C A0
C A0
CA
[28]
C A0
CA
1
rA
dC A
rA
[29]
Constant density
only
C A0
Area = =
CA
CA(t)
CA0
CA
CA(t)
CA0
dC A
rA
CA
0.0053
0.0052
0.0050
0.0045
0.0040
0.0033
0.0025
0.0018
0.00125
0.001
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
-rA
0.0053
0.0052
0.0050
0.0045
0.0040
0.0033
0.0025
0.0018
0.00125
0.001
1/rA
189
192
200
222
250
303
400
556
800
1000
Solutio
n
CSTR
600
FA 0 X
(rA ) exit
V
FA0
V
X
FA0 ( rA )exit
(0.6, 0)
1
rA
1
V
dm 3 s
X 400 0.6 240
FA0 rA
mol
400
200
0.2
0.4
0.6
Conversion X
0.8
3
5 mol 240 dm s
1200 dm 3
V
mol
s
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
-rA
0.0053
0.0052
0.0050
0.0045
0.0040
0.0033
0.0025
0.0018
0.00125
0.001
1/rA
189
192
200
222
250
303
400
556
800
1000
Solution (continuation)
V
PFR
FA 0
dX
0 rA
dX
X 1
4
1
0 rA 3 rA ( 0 ) rA ( 0.3 ) rA ( 0.6 )
0.6
600
1
rA
400
dm 3 s
148
mol
200
A B
0.2
0.4
Conversion X
0.6
0.8
3
5 mol 148 dm s
740 dm 3
V
mol
s
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
-rA
0.0053
0.0052
0.0050
0.0045
0.0040
0.0033
0.0025
0.0018
0.00125
0.001
1/rA
189
192
200
222
250
303
400
556
800
1000
A B
Solution (continuation)
Graphical Analysis
600
1
rA
Difference
between
CSTR and PFR
PFR
400
200
0.2
0.4
Conversion X
0.6
0.8
FA0
FA1
X1=0.3
V1
V1
i=2
-rA1
i=1
FA1
X1=0.3
-rA1
i=2
V2
FA2
V2
X2=0.6
FA2
X2=0.6
-rA2
-rA2
Two CSTR
FA0
V = V1 + V2
i =1
F A0
X1
r A1
V 2 ?
V1
FA1
X1=0.3
V1
i=2
-rA1
FA2
V2
X2=0.6
-rA2
F A1 F A2 r A2 V2 0
F F A2
V2 A1
- r A2
F A1 F AO - F AO X 1
F A2 F AO - F AO X 2
(F
V2
V2
V2
- F AO X 1 )(F
- r A2
- F AO X 1 F AO X 2
- r A2
F (X 2 X 1 )
AO
- r A2
AO
AO
- F AO X 2 )
X 1 dX X 2 dX
V V1 V2 FA0
r
0 A X 1 A
F
F
V V1 V2 A0 X 1 A0 X 2 X 1
rA1
rA 2
600
1
rA
600
CSTR 1
1
rA
CSTR 2
PFR 2
400
400
200
200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Conversion X
PFR 1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Conversion X
The difference between overall volume of two CSTR in series and two (or one)
PFR decreases
2) PFR-CSTR
1) CSTR-PFR
X1
2
FA0
dX
V V1 V2
X 1 FA0
rA1
rA
X1
600
1
rA
V V1 V2 FA0
0
600
CSTR
1
rA
PFR
400
400
200
200
0.2
0.4
Conversion X
0.6
0.8
dX
F
A0 X 2 X 1
rA rA2
CSTR
PFR
0.2
0.4
0.6
Conversion X
0.8
X1
600
V1
FA0
V2
X1
V1 FA0
0
dX
rA
F
V2 A0 X 2 X 1
rA2
X3
dX
rA
X2
V3 FA0
X2
V3
X3
CSTR
1
rA
PFR
400
200
V1 / FA0
V2 / FA0
X1
V3 / FA0
X2
Conversion X
X3
Answer:
It depends on the:
a) Shape of the Levenspiel plots
b) Relative reactor sizes
FA0
rA
V5
V4
V3
V2
V1
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
0.0
0.2
-rA (kmol/m3
39
53
h)
The reactor scheme is shown below
0.4
0.6
0.65
59
38
25
FA0
X1=0.2
V1
X2=0.6
V2
FA1
FA0
FAex
V3
X2=0.65
Calculate the volume of each of the reactors for an entering molar flowrate of
A of 50 kmol/h
FA0
X1=0.2
X2=0.6
V2
V1
FA1
FA0
PFR 1
CSTR 1
FAex
V3
CSTR 2
For CSTR 1
For PFR 1
F
V1 A0 X 1
rA
X3=0.65
For CSTR 2
F
V3 A0 X 3 X 2
rA
FA0
dX
V2
rA
X1
X2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.65
-rA (kmol/m3
h)
[FA0/-rA] (m3)
39
53
59
38
25
1.28
0.94
0.85
1.32
2.0
0.0
0.2
-rA
(kmol/m3 h)
39
[FA0/-rA]
(m3)
1.28
0.4
53
0.6
59
0.94
0.65
38
0.85
25
1.32
2.0
X1=0.
2
FA1
V1
CSTR
1
V2
PFR 1
X2=0.
6
FA0
FAex
V3
CSTR
2
CSTR 1
X3=0.6
5
F
V1 A0 X 1 0.94 0.2 0.188 m3
rA
2.5
FA0
dX
rA
0.2
0.6
X
V2
3
1.5
1.32
1.28
1
PFR V2
FA0
FA0
FA0
r
A x 0.2
A x 0.4 A x 0.6
V2 0.38 m 3
0.94
0.85
CSTR 2
0.5
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
F
V3 A0 X 3 X 2 2.0 0.65 0.6 0.1m3
rA
Summary