Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
mathematical tricks
the derivative of x with respect to x is x1
x x = x+ (for any and )
1
x
= x
if m = nB , then n = m1/B
(1)
y
b
= aAxa1
1 x2
x1
(2)
y
= bAxa1 xb1
(3)
2
x2
The absolute value of the slope of an isoquant is the technical rate of
substitution, or T RS. This T RS equals M P1 /M P2 so that (2) and (3) imply
that
M P2 =
T RS =
M P1
ax1
=
M P2
bx2
1
(4)
Equations (2) and (3) imply that the CobbDouglas technology is monotonic, since both partial derivatives are positive. Equation (4) demonstrates
the technology is convex, since the (absolute value) of the T RS falls as x1
increases and x2 decreases.
returns to scale
Suppose that all inputs are scaled up by some factor t. The new level of
output is
(5)
f (tx1 , tx2 ) = A(tx1 )a (tx2 )b = ta+b Axa1 xb2
Notice from equation (5) that f (tx1 , tx2 ) = ta+b f (x1 , x2 ). We have increasing
returns to scale if f (tx1 , tx2 ) > tf (x1 , x2 ) whenever t > 1. So here we have
increasing returns to scale if ta+b > t, which is the same thing as a + b > 1.
Similarly, decreasing returns to scale arise if f (tx1 , tx2 ) < tf (x1 , x2 ) whenever t > 1. Here decreasing returns to scale occur if ta+b < t, or a + b < 1.
profit maximization
(6)
f
f
This profit maximum is achieved when p x
= w1 and x
= w2 . From
1
2
equations (2) and (3), with a CobbDouglas production function, profit is
maximized if
b
paAxa1
(7)
1 x 2 = w1
pbAxa1 xb1
= w2
2
(8)
Equations (7) and (8) describe the input choices which maximize profit, but
they do constitute two equations in two unknowns. Some substitutions are
needed to derive the actual profitmaximizing choices of x1 and x2 as explicit
functions of w1 , w2 and p.
If both sides of (7) are multiplied by x1 , and both sides of (8) are multiplied by x2 , then
(9)
pa[Axa1 xb2 ] = w1 x1
pb[Axa1 xb2 ] = w2 x2
2
(10)
(11)
bpy = w2 x2
(12)
b w1
x1
a w2
(13)
b w1 b
x1 ] = w 1
a w2
(14)
(15)
x1ab
= pAa1b bb w1b1 w2b
1
(16)
or
Taking both sides to the power 1/(1 a b) yields
(1b)/(1ab)
b/(1ab) 1/(1ab)
w2
(17)
which is the profitmaximizing firms demand for input #1, as a function of
the prices of the 2 inputs, and of the price of the output.
Substituting for x 1 from (17) into (13) (and some simplifying) gives
the demand for input #2,
a/(1ab)
(1a)/(1ab) 1/(1ab)
w2
(18)
Equation (11) implies that y =
w1 x1
,
ap
a/(1ab)
b/(1ab) (a+b)/(1ab)
w2
(19)
which is the equation for the perfectly competitive firms supply curve : its
profitmaximizing quantity of output, as a function of the price p of the
output (and of the prices of the inputs).
3
Since a and b are both positive, equation (19) indicates that the quantity
supplied of output y, by the profitmaximizing perfectly competitive firm,
will be increasing in the price p of its output, and decreasing in the prices
w1 and w2 of its inputs, if and only if
1ab>0
Now the condition for the production technology to exhibit decreasing returns
to scale was a + b < 1, which is the same thing as 1 a b > 0.
So as long as the technology exhibits decreasing returns to scale, then
the firms supply curve slopes up, and its quantity of output is a decreasing
function of all input prices. Equations (17) and (18) show that the (unconditional) demand for each input is decreasing in the price of that input,
provided that the technology exhibits decreasing returns to scale.
[If a + b = 1, so that there are constant returns to scale, then equations (17), (18) and (19) are meaningless, since 1/(1 a b) = 1/0 = . If
a + b > 1, so that there are increasing returns to scale, then it turns out that
equations (7) and (8) dont actually define a maximum. So section 4 makes
sense only if we have decreasing returns to scale.]
cost minimization
The cost minimization problem (chapter 20) takes the target level of output
y as given, along with the unit prices w1 and w2 of the inputs.
The firstorder conditions for cost minimization imply that M P1 /M P2 =
w1 /w2 , which (from equation (4)) here implies
w1
a x2
=
b x1
w2
(20)
b w1 b
x1 ]
a w2
(21)
or
y = Aab bb w1b w2b xa+b
1
(22)
xa+b
= A1 ab bb w1b w2b y
1
(23)
or
Taking both sides of (23) to the power 1/(a + b),
b/(a+b)
b/(a+b) 1/(a+b)
w2
(24)
which is the conditional input demand function for input #1. Substituting
from (24) into (13), the conditional input demand for input #2 is
a/(a+b)
a/(a+b) 1/(a+b)
w2
(25)
b/(a+b) 1/(a+b)
(26)
b/(a+b) 1/(a+b)
(27)
w2
and
a/(a+b)
w2
so that the total cost of producing y units in the cheapest possible way is
a/(a+b)
C(w1 , w2 , y) = w1 x1 + w2 x2 = Bw1
b/(a+b) 1/(a+b)
w2
(28)
(29)
C(w1 , w2 , y
Bw1
AC =
=
y
b/(a+b) 1/(a+b)
w2
y
(30)
AC = Bw1
b/(a+b) (a+b1)/(a+b)
w2
(31)