Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DRAFT IMECE2007-43427
1-D MODEL AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF PRESSURE WAVE SUPERCHARGER
Ludk Pohoelsk
Josef Boek Research Center
Czech Technical University in Prague
Technicka 4,CZ-166 07 Praha 6
Phone +420 2 2435-2507
Fax.+420 2 2435 2500
Email :ludek.pohorelsky@fs.cvut.cz
Ji Vvra
Josef Boek Research Center
Czech Technical University in
Prague
Technicka 4,CZ-166 07 Praha
6
Phone +420 2 2435-1827
Fax.+420 2 2435 2500
Email :jiri.vavra@fs.cvut.cz
Philippe Obernesser
RENAULT
TCR GRA 085-1, avenue du Golf - 78288
Guyancourt cedex, France
tel: +33 1 76 85 30 70
fax:+33 1 76 85 77 16
Email : philippe.obernesser@renault.com
Vojtch Klr
Josef Boek Research Center
Czech Technical University in
Prague
Technicka 4,CZ-166 07 Praha
6
Phone +420 2 2435-1855
Fax.+420 2 2435 2500
Email :vojtech.klir@fs.cvut.cz
ABSTRACT
In this contribution an interesting boosting device, called
pressure wave supercharger (PWS) according the wave
phenomena inside it and taking advantage of speed of sound
for air compression, is investigated both at diesel engine and at
combustion chamber test bench using 1-D simulation and
experimental measuring. Moreover, combustion engine
supercharged by PWS has been compared using 1-D simulation
to turbocharged one at steady state and transient operations.
Pressure wave supercharger is simulated using detailed model
based on the partial differential equations capturing non-linear
effects of gas dynamics. The work has been performed using
the commercial 1-D code GT-Power. Concept of modeling used
enables to integrate the PWS model with all other models
which are already created in the commercial codes (like more
precise model of combustion, vehicle model, etc.)
The PWS takes advantage of the direct pressure and enthalpy
exchange between exhaust gases and fresh air in narrow
channels to provide boost pressure. Due to the direct contact
between exhaust gas and fresh air a mixing occurs.
Nevertheless, this internal recirculation of exhaust gas can be
used for lowering of NOx emissions, but in the same time it
Jan Macek
Josef Boek Research Center
Czech Technical University in
Prague
Technicka 4,CZ-166 07 Praha
6
Phone +420 2 2435-2504
Fax.+420 2 2435 2500
Email :jan.macek@fs.cvut.cz
Moreover, in 1980s many companies tested the COMPREX supercharged diesel engines, but only two started the serial
production. The Opel Company sold in a special Opel Senator
set of about 700 units with 2.3l diesel engine and pressure
wave supercharging [31] whereas Mazda sold about 150 000
COMPREX diesel passenger cars [4].
Recently, several Universities (ETH Zrich, Indiana University
Purdue University Indianapolis, Michigan State University,
University of Tokyo, Warsaw University and Beijing
University of Technology), companies (Swissauto Engineering
S.A., Rolls Royce Alison) and governmental research centers
(NASA) investigate pressure wave process intensively for
various thermal applications. In [4] a comprehensive review of
past and current research in developing of wave rotor
technology is explained in more details and in a well arranged
way.
In framework of our study the PWS has been investigated and
analyzed at first using 1-D diesel engine simulation. Then by
means of experimental tests at the test bench to find out
whether the pressure wave supercharging with regard to
todays state of art in control, actuation, materials and
technology could fulfill requirements on a modern and
perspective car propulsion system and become a serious
competitor to current boosting systems.
1-D SIMULATION OF PWS SUPERCHARGED DIESEL
ENGINE
For the study the Renault 1.5 diesel engine has been used
for 1-D investigations to compare PWS supercharged engine to
the turbocharged one.
Stroke
Bore
Total swept volume
Number of cylinders
Compression ratio
Combustion system
80.5 mm
76 mm
1461 cm3
4
16:1
2valves/cylinder
Direct injection
260
240
220
Torque [N.m]
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
1000
PWS83
PWS83_patented_Swissauto_geometry
PWS70
PWS95
Turbo
PWS95_patented_Swissauto_geometry
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
2.6
2.4
50
2.2
2
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
PWS83
PWS83_patented_Swissauto_geometry
PWS70
PWS95
PWS95_patented_Swissauto_geometry
40
PWS83
PWS83_patented_Swissauto_geometry
PWS70
PWS95
Turbo
PWS95_patented_Swissauto_geometry
1.8
EGR [%]
2.8
30
20
4500
10
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
230
ISFC [g/kW/h]
220
210
200
190
180
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
3.4
3.2
3
Pressure [bar]
2.8
Low-Pressure
part
2.6
2.4
2.2
Turbo-boost pressure
1.8
1.6
PWS95_patented_Swissauto_geometry-boost pressure
1.4
Turbo-back pressure
1.2
PWS95_patented_Swissauto_geometry-back pressure
1
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Expansion Pocket
4500
PWS Speed
Figure 6 shows the PWS speed characteristics. As the time
of pressure wave propagation from exhaust to air side
decreases with the reduction of the PWS size, the smallest
PWS achieves the highest speeds.
Diagrams on Figure 7 present dependences of the engine toque,
boost pressure, indicated specific fuel consumption and the
exhaust gas recirculation on the PWS speed. Each observed
quantity achieves its optimum at a certain PWS speed. The
increase of the PWS speed contributes to the lowering of the
exhaust gas recirculation.
PWS speed optimized for maximum engine torque
15000
14000
13000
12000
11000
PWS83
PWS70
10000
PWS95
9000
8000
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
High-Pressure
part
Compression
Pocket
Channel
Exhaust
Flange
Air Flange
4500
2.9
20
19
2.8
1.9
13
230
11
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
PWS83-engine torque
225
7
5
220
1.2
PWS83-boost pressure
PWS83-ISFC
PWS83-EGR
1.1
100
10000
1
11000
12000
13000
14000
PWS speed [1/min]
15000
16000
17
3
1
215
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
PWS speed [1/min]
15000
16000
16
2.6
15
14
2.5
ISFC [g/kW/h]
1.8
150
18
2.7
EGR [%]
200
EGR [%]
13
2.4
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
12
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
26
230
210
21
EGR [%]
190
Torque [N.m]
170
150
130
16
PWS83
11
110
90
70
50
30
1000
6
PWS83_pipings with diameter of 75% of PWS rotor diameter
PWS83_pipings with diameter of 50% of PWS rotor diameter
PWS83_pipings with diameter of 40% of PWS rotor diameter
1500
2000
2500
3000
1
1.5
3500
4000
2.0
2.5
4500
3.0
3.5
4.0
Time [sec]
1.8
1.5
1.4
1.3
PWS83
Turbo
1.2
150
100
PW S83_constant_speed
Turbo
PW S83_with_speed_control
50
0
1
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Time [sec]
Figure 11: Boost pressure response for 1.5 diesel engine with
PWS83 at engine speed of 1250 rpm
The PWS boost pressure increases steeper than the
turbocharger one (Figure 11). During the load step an increased
internal exhaust gas recirculation appears (Figure 13), this is
the reason of the decreasing delay at the middle of the load step
between the PWS supercharged and turbocharged engine
(Figure 12).
Engine torque response
200
180
160
140
120
100
PWS83
Turbo
80
60
40
20
0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Time [sec]
Figure 12: Torque response for 1.5 diesel engine with PWS83
at engine speed of 1250 rpm
19000
18000
17000
16000
15000
14000
13000
12000
1
1.1
1.6
200
1.7
1.5
2.5
3
3.5
Time [s]
4.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Time [s]
Figure 14: Engine torque and its remedy during the load step
of spark ignited 1.2l engine at engine speed of 2000rpm from
[38]
EXPERIMENTAL TESTS ON PWS
For the engine 1-D simulation, presented in this paper, a
PWS model has been used, whose physical behavior was
representative enough. From the 1-D engine simulation a
favorable PWS low end torque behavior and transient response
arise. Moreover, the PWS could be with advantage used for
control of quantity of recycled exhaust gas to combustion
engine. However, the internal exhaust gas recirculation, boost
pressure and mass flow value should be checked and settled to
enable the model. Therefore, to keep developing 1-D model of
supercharging system with PWS the PWS operating points
have been tested and measured at the combustion chamber test
bench with open circuit (Figure 15). The specimen of tested
PWS was model CX93 used by Mazda Company for
supercharging of 2.0l diesel engine [27].
In framework of experimental testing of PWS the mass flow
range at PWS air inlet (AI), air outlet (AO) and exhaust inlet
(EI), the PWS speed range and range of the PWS exhaust inlet
(EI) temperature have been largely explored.
p3 T3
m 2, C
p2
T2
Noise
AO
m3 , C
EI
Electrical motor
(RPMc from 0 to 20000)
AI
p1
EO
m1
p4
Backpressure
floodgate
EI
Gas analyzer
display
EO
AI
AO
Figure 22: PWS performance map for air inlet mass flow for
EI temperature of 900K
egr [1]
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
10000
15000
20000
25000
p3=100kPa T3=800K
p3=100kPa T3=900K
p3=100kPa T3=1050K
p3=150kPa T3=800K
p3=150kPa T3=900K
p3=150kPa T3=1050K
p3=200kPa T3=800K
p3=200kPa T3=900K
p3=200kPa T3=1050K
0.4
etaPWS [1]
5000
Relative pressures
0.3
200
150
p2 [kPa]
0.2
0
100
5000
15000
20000
25000
50
p3=100kPa T3=900K
p3=100kPa T3=1050K
0
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
p3=100kPa T3=800K
p3=100kPa T3=900K
p3=100kPa T3=1050K
p3=150kPa T3=800K
p3=150kPa T3=900K
p3=150kPa T3=1050K
p3=200kPa T3=800K
p3=200kPa T3=900K
p3=200kPa T3=1050K
10000
400
300
200
100
0
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
p3=100kPa T3=800K
p3=100kPa T3=900K
p3=100kPa T3=1050K
p3=150kPa T3=800K
p3=150kPa T3=900K
p3=150kPa T3=1050K
p3=200kPa T3=800K
p3=200kPa T3=900K
p3=200kPa T3=1050K
2.40
2.20
2.00
1.80
1.60
dia 35 mm
dia 50 mm
WG
w / o Loss
1.40
1.20
140
Flow losses
120
Relative pressure p2 [kPa]
p1 [kPa]
C [1]
2.60
5
4
dia 35 mm
dia 50 mm
3
2
1.00
1
0
100
200
300
400
m2red [kg/h]
500
600
700
100
200
300
400
m3 [kg/h]
500
600
700
100
80
60
100kg/h
300kg/h
400kg/h
97
97.5
500kg/h
40
20
0
95.5
96
96.5
98
98.5
99
99.5
0.35
0.45
0.30
0.35
0.25
0.30
0.20
egr [1]
0.25
0.20
dia 35 mm
dia 50 mm
WG
w / o Loss
0.15
0.10
0.05
dia 35 mm
dia 50 mm
WG
w / o Loss
0.45
0.4
0.15
0.35
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.3
100kg/h
0.00
100
200
300
400
m2, m3 [kg/h]
500
600
700
100
200
300
400
500
600
egr [1]
etaPWS [1]
0.40
700
m2, m3 [kg/h]
300kg/h
400kg/h
500kg/h
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
PWS
EO
Figure 30: EO throttle controlled by stepper electrical motor
with snail box
Diagrams in Figure 31 and Figure 32 present the sensitivity of
the PWS on the EO pressure for EI mass flows of (100,300,400
and 500) kg/h and for EI temperature of 900K. The PWS speed
has been kept at 15 000rpm. The change in EO pressure by
2kPa deteriorates the boost pressure significantly (Figure 31).
The increased EO pressure lowers the amount of sucked AI
mass flow and increases the internal exhaust gas recirculation
rises (Figure 32).
Moreover, increased EO pressure may cause the back flow of
the exhaust gas to the AI.
0
95.5
96
96.5
97
97.5
98
98.5
99
99.5
Pipeline of pressurized
air to PWS air inlet
2.50
2.40
2.30
2.20
2.10
2.00
1.90
1.80
1.70
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Mass flows
580
m1, m2, m3 [kg/h]
530
p2_300
p3_300
p4_300
480
430
m1
m2
m3
20
30
40
50
Relative pressure p1 [kPa]
60
380
330
10
20
30
40
50
Relative pressure p1 [kPa]
60
70
Mass flows
530
m1, m2, m3 [kg/h]
580
250
200
p2_300
p3_300
p4_300
150
100
50
480
430
m1
m2
m3
380
330
280
230
180
0
0
20
40
60
80
Relative pressure p1 [kPa]
100
120
0.35
120
0.3
100
0.25
80
60
40
20
40
60
80
Relative pressure p1 [kPa]
100
120
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
PWS speed [rpm]
m1-300kg/h-measured
m1-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
m2-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
m3-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
280
70
180
10
140
20
230
0
160
0
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
2.40
2.30
2.20
2.10
p2 [bar]
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
p3-300kg/h measured
EGR [1]
PWS Supercharging
15 000 rpm, m2=m3=300 kg/h, T3=900K
p2-300kg/h-measured
2.00
1.90
1.80
1.70
1.60
1.50
0
5000
10000
PWS speed [rpm]
15000
20000
10
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
m2 [g/s]
5000
10000
15000
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0
2000
6000
8000
10000 12000
PWS speed [rpm]
20000
4000
EGR comparison
0.7
100
0.6
80
60
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.1
0
80
egr-300kg/h-measured
0.3
40
20
100
0.8
120
EGR [1]
m1 [g/s]
120
20000
1
0.9
140
140
18000
160
16000
5000
10000
15000
20000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
60
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
EGR [%]
14000
0.20
0.10
0.00
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
11
p2-300kg/h-measured
p3-300kg/h measured
p2-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
p3-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
p2-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets with dx=5mm
p3-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets with dx=5mm
0
5000
10000
PWS speed [rpm]
15000
20000
2.2
2.1
2
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
9500
10000
EGR comparison
0.5
140
0.45
0.4
120
egr-300kg/h-measured
egr-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
egr-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets with dx=5mm
0.35
100
EGR [1]
80
60
m1-300kg/h-measured
m1-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
m2-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
m3-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets
m1-300kg/h 1-D model without pockets with dx=5mm
40
20
0
0
5000
10000
PWS speed [rpm]
15000
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
20000
0
5000
7000
9000
11000
13000
15000
17000
19000
131
121
111
101
91
81
71
61
51
41
31
21
11
1
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
9500
10000
Figure 47: Computed air outlet mass flow for back pressure of
2bar and two different temperatures
CONCLUSIONS
In framework of the study presented in this paper the
pressure wave supercharger (PWS) has been investigated using
1-D engine simulation and experimental measurement at the
combustion chamber test bench.
1-D simulation of different PWS sizes contributed to
understanding of PWS behavior in engine application. The
PWS has higher boost pressure at low engine speeds than the
turbocharger. Using the variable transmission ratio between the
PWS and the engine the boost pressure can be hold on high
level over the whole engine speed range. Whereas the engine
speed increases the scavenging of the PWS rotor decreases. At
the highest engine speeds the internal exhaust gas recirculation
rises and deteriorates the engine power. The variable gas pocket
improves the rotor scavenging and can be with advantage used
for boost pressure control. During the transient operation the
increased internal exhaust gas recirculation appeared. Change
of PWS speed during the load step improved transient
behavior.
The PWS has been largely explored at the combustion chamber
test bench and performance maps of measured PWS created.
The measurement showed high sensitivity of PWS on flow
losses mainly in exhaust outlet. Pressure increase in air inlet of
PWS increases the boost pressure by the same pressure.
12
The 1-D model of PWS at the test bench has been created to
compare simulation to experiment. The established database of
measured data creates very good basis for further 1-D model
calibration. The qualitative reaction of PWS model is in a very
good agreement with the measurement. The 1-D model predicts
higher difference between boost pressure and back pressure and
in larger PWS speed range than measurements. In next steps
mainly the flow losses in the model should be tuned to calibrate
the model.
Utilization of the PWS in the fuel cell application makes a
burner PWS upstream necessary. 1-D model and measured
database could be with advantage used for further
investigations on this topic.
NOMENCLATURE
AI
AO
C
EI
EO
etaPWS
ISFC
m1
m2
m2red
m3
p0
p2
p3
p4
piC
PWS
t0
t1
t2
t3
t4
Air inlet
Air outlet
Molar fraction of CO2
Exhaust inlet
Exhaust outlet
Total efficiency of PWS
Indicated specific fuel consumption [g/kW/h]
Mass flow in AI [kg/h]
Mass flow in AO [kg/h]
Reduced air mass flow in AO [kg/h]
Air mass flow in EI [kg/h]
Ambient pressure [kPa]
Relative boost pressure [kPa]
Relative EI pressure [kPa]
Relative EO pressure [kPa]
Pressure ratio [1]
Pressure wave supercharger
Ambient temperature
Inlet temperature [deg C]
AO temperature [deg C]
EI average temperature [deg C]
EO temperature [deg C]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to express their grateful thanks to
Czech turbocharger maker Z a.s., division Turbo, namely to
Mr. Stulk, Mr. Havelka, Mr. Mach and division director Mr.
Pinkas for fruitful cooperation and support throughout the
project. Special thank belongs to prof. Takats from JBRC for
his kindly help with taking CO2 measurement into operation.
Additional thanks belong also to authors colleges from JBRC
prof. Uhl and prof. Novk for their kind help with taking of
PWS electric drive into operation.
.
REFERENCES
[1] Spring, P.: Modeling and Control of Pressure-Wave
Supercharged Engine Systems. Dissertation ETH Zrich 2006,
No.16490
13
14
ANNEX A
COMPARISON OF 1-D MODEL SIMULATION TO MEASUREMENT
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
100
80
60
40
0
0
5000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
0.02
0
0
5000
10000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
20000
20000
egr-100kg/h-measured
EGR comparison
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
6000
15000
180
160
140
15000
EGR [1]
8000
10000
6000
0.1
0.08
p3-100kg/h-measured
p3-100kg/h 1-D model without pockets
3.1
3
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
2
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.06
0.04
20
EGR [1]
1.5
EGR comparison
0.2
0.18
120
1.6
Mass flow [g/sec]
1.7
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
p2-400kg/h-measured
p3-400kg/h 1-D model without pockets
0.9
160
0.8
140
0.7
120
0.6
100
EGR [1]
EGR comparison
80
60
0.2
20
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
PWS speed [rpm]
p2-500kg/h-measured
p3-500kg/h-measured
p2-500kg/h 1-D model without pockets
p3-500kg/h 1-D model without pockets
0.4
0.3
40
0
6000
0.5
0.1
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
0
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
15