Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Table of Contents
5. Environmental Management Plan ............................................................................................................ 1
5.1
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
5.1.1 Environmental Management Objectives ............................................................................... 1
5.1.2 Structure, Implementation and Review ................................................................................. 1
5.1.3 Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................... 3
5.1.4 Internal Monitoring, Incident Response and Reporting ......................................................... 5
5.1.5 Legislation and Standards ..................................................................................................... 7
5.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 10
5.2.1 Project Location ................................................................................................................. 10
5.2.2 Project Activities ................................................................................................................ 12
5.2.3 Project Stakeholders ........................................................................................................... 14
5.2.4 Environmental Policy ......................................................................................................... 16
5.2.5 Issues Requiring Specific Management Strategies................................................................ 16
5.3 Environmental Management Commitments .................................................................................. 19
5.3.1 Geology, Geohazards and Soils .......................................................................................... 19
5.3.2 Water Quality and Flow ..................................................................................................... 25
5.3.3 Aquatic Ecology ................................................................................................................. 46
5.3.4 Terrestrial Ecology .............................................................................................................. 54
5.3.5 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 64
5.3.6 Noise ................................................................................................................................. 69
5.3.7 Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................ 75
5.3.8 Waste Management ............................................................................................................ 82
5.3.9 Transportation .................................................................................................................... 91
5.3.10 Society and Community Values .......................................................................................... 98
Appendices
Appendix A
Weekly Environmental Inspection Template
Appendix B
Incident Response Form Template
Appendix C
Complaint Response Form Template
Appendix D
Cultural Heritage Management Plan
PAGE i
5.
5.1
Introduction
This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been prepared for the SMM Solomon Limited (SMM
Solomon) Solomon Islands Nickel Project (the Project) for the purpose of providing a stand-alone
plan for managing the potential environmental and social impacts of proposed construction and
operation activities on Choiseul Island. This EMP is based on the assessments and findings of the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.2.1
Structure
This EMP has been developed based on a number of individual specialist studies and reports
prepared for the EIS. The specialist studies assessed the environmental values and the potential for
impacts to these from the proposed Project. Risk assessments were undertaken to determine the
significance of each potential impact based on a consequence and probability matrix, producing a
low, medium or high significance level for each impact. Management measures have been proposed
with the aim of reducing these risk levels.
For each environmental and social element, the following is described within this EMP:
management strategies (in table format), including for each potential impact:
facility areas and facilities relevant to the impact (mine areas, haulage including ore
handling and transportation, port areas and marine operations, general infrastructure)
stage stage of works relevant to the impact (construction including design and preconstruction, operation including decommissioning and rehabilitation)
PAGE 1
management actions individual tasks and on-site actions that can be undertaken at the
relevant facility and stage
auditing, corrective action and reporting procedures for reviewing and auditing
management activities, remediating or amending after impacts or non-conformity occurs,
responding to incidents, and keeping appropriate records.
A mitigation hierarchy (refer to Figure 5-1) was used within each specialist study and is best practice
guidance for understanding the scope of mitigation measures. The mitigation hierarchy emphasises
the principle of preventing environmental impacts from happening in the first instance and if this is
not possible then limiting the impacts to an acceptable level (ICMM 2006).
5.1.2.2
Implementation
Based on the EMP implementation guide within the Environmental Impact Assessment for
Developing Countries in Asia (Lohani et al. 1997), this EMP is planned to be implemented as
follows:
1. Final detailed design will incorporate specifications and plans for meeting the approved EIS.
2. Construction contract specifications will include all required mitigation measures.
3. Construction contractors performance will be internally monitored and audited against the EMP
and relevant plans and drawings, including daily and weekly inspections, and monthly internal
reporting of environmental incidents and corrective actions taken.
4. Implementation and auditing of the monitoring program throughout the construction and
operation stages, including actions recommended to improve ongoing environmental
management.
5. Reporting and evidence of the above steps during the various Project stages.
Project activities will be undertaken within an Environmental Management System, which will be
established at the commencement of the Project. This EMP will form the basis of a Construction EMP
and an Operations EMP to be developed following detailed design.
PAGE 2
The review and sign-off of the EMP will be a Hold Point for the Project construction stage (i.e. no
construction stage works shall commence before these plans are approved by the Environmental
Manager and Construction/Project Manager).
All staff will be inducted to the Project and their relevant work sites prior to commencing any work.
The induction will instruct staff on the health, safety and environmental awareness and management
obligations for the Project and the EMP for the duration of the Project. Inductions will include (as a
minimum) explanation of:
cultural sensitivity
emergency procedures.
5.1.2.3
5.1.3
5.1.3.1
Construction/Project Manager
The Construction Manager and Project Manager will be responsible for the following:
Maintain general communications with stakeholders and authorities to inform them of planned
activities where relevant.
Certify additional management plans to be attached to and incorporated into the EMP.
PAGE 3
5.1.3.2
Site Supervisors
The Site Supervisors will be responsible for the following in their area of works:
Ensure the measures detailed in the Construction or Operations EMPs and associated plans and
specifications are implemented correctly, on schedule, and are effective and appropriate for the
site and activities.
Sign-off on additional plans and drawings prior to construction or implementation, such as the
Hold Point for erosion and sediment control measures to be in place prior to clearing and
earthworks commencing for a mine area.
Daily inspections of activities and mitigation measures with corrective actions taken and
recorded where necessary, or other resolutions made and their justification.
Ensure periodic collection of data from weather station and any data loggers is occurring.
Ensure all personnel have the relevant qualifications and training to carry out their relevant tasks
and roles.
Hold daily pre-start toolbox meetings with personnel to discuss the current Project activities and
the health, safety and environmental issues associated with these.
Take corrective action or otherwise respond to management needs following SMM Solomon onsite inspections and EMP audits.
5.1.3.3
Environmental Team
The Environmental Team is likely to consist of an Environmental Manager, Environmental Officers
and Community Liaison Officer, who will be responsible for the following:
Review of EMP following detailed design in order to verify that the proposed measures are
adequate for the site and activities, detailed design and specifications have been incorporated,
and documentation is present (e.g. daily and weekly inspection checklists, emergency/incident
response form, and complaint response form).
Provide input to site inductions for all personnel in terms of environmental values, potential
impacts from the project, management measures, and reporting of incidents and emergencies.
Undertake or coordinate the various monitoring activities, such as water quality data collection.
Lead investigations into any significant environmental incidents and monitor the close-out of
these incidents.
Half-yearly internal audits of EMP implementation (of both documentation/records and on-site
controls).
PAGE 4
5.1.3.4
All Personnel
All project personnel will have a general duty of care to take reasonable and practicable actions to
not cause environmental harm.
All staff will have a responsibility to report potentially harmful activities (environmental or otherwise)
to their Site Supervisor.
All staff involved in the construction, operation and decommissioning activities will be appropriately
qualified and trained to undertake their project roles and tasks.
All staff will be inducted to the project and their relevant work sites prior to commencing any work.
All site staff must attend the toolbox meeting prior to work commencing each day.
Personnel in charge of vehicles or machinery will undertake daily pre-start checks to ensure
equipment is in good working condition, does not need any repairs or maintenance, does not have
excess dirt or material, and contains all necessary equipment within it (e.g. spill kits, fire
extinguishers). A checklist will be kept in each vehicle to record daily pre-start checks.
5.1.4
5.1.4.1
Monitoring
All monitoring data and results will be recorded, compiled and retained for five years (minimum).
Specific monitoring programs are described in the management strategies tables for each
environmental element within this EMP.
Monitoring programs will be undertaken in accordance with recognised standards, codes and
guidelines in order to establish and maintain appropriate and consistent sampling protocols, analysis
and quality assurance. Monitoring tasks will be undertaken by qualified and trained staff. Laboratory
analysis will be undertaken by NATA accredited laboratories.
All monitoring records, raw data and resultant reporting will be kept in Project documentation on-site
and be made available to relevant authorities upon request.
5.1.4.2
Inspections
Daily inspections of work areas will be undertaken by the Site Supervisor throughout the course of
their daily activities. The issues to be checked during daily inspections include:
need for additional erosion and sediment controls, taking into consideration (and recording)
current or forecast weather
Weekly environmental inspections of work areas and implemented management measures will be
undertaken by the Environmental Officer, and will include the above environmental elements and
any other management issues observed.
PAGE 5
The Weekly Environmental Inspection Template attached as Appendix A can be used to record
relevant information and to prompt the user to identify issues during site inspections.
Monthly internal environmental reporting will include issues that are recurring on inspection records.
All inspection records will be kept in Project documentation on-site and be made available to
relevant authorities upon request.
5.1.4.3
a disturbance to a protected area, exclusion zone or area outside of the designated Project area
action or event that causes or has the potential to cause significant environmental harm
an environmental event endangering personnel or broader community health or safety (i.e. near
miss or actual incident), such as a bushfire or contaminant spill.
Staff will notify the Site Supervisor immediately upon becoming aware of an incident or emergency,
who will then notify the Project Manager and Environmental Officer, where relevant.
The authority will be notified as soon as possible after becoming aware of any emergency, incident
or action that has or could potentially result in environmental harm. This will be followed by written
advice to the authority that will describe the nature of the emergency or incident, the actions taken at
the time of the event, any additional monitoring of the situation and impacts, and the proposed
actions to prevent a similar occurrence in the future.
The Incident Response Form Template attached as Appendix B can be used to record the required
information for notification, corrective action, and reporting purposes. An Emergency Response Form
will be included in the Emergency Response Plan to be developed.
Monthly internal environmental reporting will include information about any incidents or
emergencies and responses and actions taken as a result.
All incident and emergency records will be kept in Project documentation on-site and be made
available to relevant authorities upon request.
5.1.4.4
Complaints/Grievance Procedure
More information on the complaints or grievance process is provided in the Grievance Procedure for
the Project.
Any complaints/grievances received that relate to this Projects activities require at least the following
to be recorded:
nature of complaint
PAGE 6
The Complaint Response Form Template attached at the end of Appendix C can be used to record
this information.
Monthly internal environmental reporting will include information about any complaints received
and responses and actions taken as a result.
All complaint records will be kept in Project documentation on-site and be made available to
relevant authorities upon request.
5.1.5
Issue
General
Environmental and
Mining
Management
Nature conservation
Surface and
groundwater
PAGE 7
Issue
Cultural heritage
Waste
for Water and Sanitation and Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality; ISO
5667:2006 Water quality Sampling; AS/NZS 2031: 2001
Guidelines: ANZECC-ARMCANZ Australian and New Zealand Fresh and Marine
Water Quality and Australian Drinking Water Standards (ADWS); World Health
Organization (WHO) Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality (GDWQ);
Legislation: Choiseul Province Preservation of Culture Ordinance 1997
Guidelines: UN Guidelines on the Protection of the Cultural Heritage of
Indigenous Peoples
International Standards: WBG/IFC Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines
for Mining, Environmental, Air Emissions and Ambient Air Quality, and Noise
Management; US EPA National Ambient Air Quality Standards; WHO Guidelines
for Air Quality, Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen
dioxide and sulphur dioxide global update 2005, and Guidelines for
Community Noise; ISO 1996-2:2007 Acoustics
Guidelines: DERM Queensland Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008;
Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) Approved Methods for the Modelling
and Assessment of Air Pollutants in New South Wales; Australian Standard
(AS)4156.6:2000 for air monitoring and ISO for air and noise monitoring
Solomon Islands Legislation: Ports Act 1996; Civil Aviation Act 1986;
Quarantine Act 1978; Customs and Excise Act 1960, Petroleum Act 1987; Safety
at Work Act 1982; Workmen Compensation Act 1952; Labour Act 1996;
International Standards: WBG/IFC Environmental, Health and Safety General
Guidelines;
International Agreements: Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973; London
Convention; Waigani Convention; Protocol 1 Dumping; Protocol 2 Emergencies;
Liability for Oil Pollution Damage
Guidelines: International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code;
International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code; International Maritime
Solid Bulk Cargoes Code (IMSBC)
Solomon Islands Legislation: Shipping Act 1998; Marine Safety Administration
Act 2009; Agriculture Quarantine Act 1996; Environmental Health Act 1996 and
Environmental Health (Public Health Act) Regulations 2006; Pharmacy and
Poisons Act 1988; Explosives Act 1996; Petroleum Act 1996;
International Standards: WBG/IFC Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines
for Waste Management, Hazardous Materials Management, Construction and
Decommissioning, Community Health and Safety, Mining, Ports Harbours and
Terminals, and Waste Management Facilities;
International Agreements: Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973; London
Convention; Stockholm Convention; Waigani Convention; Noumea Convention;
Protocol 1 Dumping; Protocol 2 Emergencies; UN Convention on the Law of the
Sea (UNCLOS III)
Guidelines: Australian Standards Technical Manual (ASTM) for waste sampling,
treatment, disposal and management
PAGE 8
5.1.5.1
The immediate aim of EIA is to inform the process of decision making by identifying the
potentially significant environmental effects and risks of development proposals.
The long term aim of EIA is to promote sustainable development by ensuring that development
proposals do not undermine critical resource and ecological functions or well-being, lifestyle and
livelihood of the communities and peoples who depend on them.
Under the second schedule of the Environment Act 1998 extraction of minerals and mining and the
associated project infrastructure is a prescribed development. As a result of the Solomon Islands
Governments desire to properly and responsibly manage the countrys natural resources and protect
the environment, the Director of the Environment and Conservation Division has determined that an
EIS is required for this Project.
The Solomon Islands Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines (April 2010), produced by the
Environment and Conservation Division, Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Meteorology,
states that the purpose of the EIA process is, in part, to promote environmentally sound and
sustainable development through the identification of appropriate mitigation measures, and to
predict, avoid, minimise or offset the adverse significant environmental and social impacts of
development (ECD 2010).
Granting an EIA approval requires that a project meets several criteria, including that the
development will be carried out in a way that is consistent with all relevant environmental policies
and regulations, and has reasonable steps in place to minimise any risk of environmental harm (ECD
2010).
Monitoring may be carried out by the approving authority of the developments environmental
impacts, effectiveness of mitigation measures, safeguards and standards adopted for protection of the
environment by the project (ECD 2010).
5.1.5.2
PAGE 9
Goals of the EMP are to ensure that all necessary corrective actions, both mitigating and offsetting,
are carried out to counter adverse environmental impacts, and that enhancement measures are used
where feasible and practical. Goals of monitoring programs includes to observe and analyse the
projects impacts, thereby providing information to help in amending or updating mitigation
measures to reduce the risks associated with a project (Lohani et al. 1997).
5.1.5.3
The Queensland DERM provides terms of reference and guidelines for preparing a project EIS,
including identification and management of impacts for issues in relation to land, transport, waste,
water, coastal environment, air, noise and vibration, ecology, cultural heritage, social values, health
and safety, economy, and hazard and risk. These terms of reference also provide guidance on the
potential mitigation measures for mining projects and the requirement for a stand-alone EMP.
5.2
5.2.1
Project Description
Project Location
The Project is located in the Solomon Islands in the South-Western Pacific Ocean. The Solomon
Islands have a land mass of approximately 28,400 km2 consisting of six major islands and
approximately 922 smaller islands, atolls and reefs. The major islands are Choiseul, New Georgia,
Santa Isabel, Guadalcanal, Malaita and Makira (also called San Cristobal).
While SMM Solomon proposes to mine a number of their existing tenements on both Choiseul and
Santa Isabel Islands, this EMP proposes management measures for the proposed activities on
Choiseul Island only.
The Choiseul 1 tenement is a prospecting licence (PL-06/05) for nickel and cobalt, which was issued
on 13 December 2005, was renewed on 10 December 2008 and will expire 6 December 2012.
Choiseul 1 is located on the southern end of the island and has an approximate area of 185 km2.
SMM Solomon holds 100% of the Choiseul 1 tenement. Refer to Figure 5-2 for Project location and
features of Choiseul Island.
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
5.2.2
Project Activities
The construction phase of the Project is scheduled to commence in early 2013 approximately 36
months prior to the commencement of operations in mid-2015. This phase requires both early works
(2013) and pre-production (2014) development activities. The construction phase sequencing is as
follows:
establish initial access roads to mine infrastructure and initial mine pits and road sediment
control, and initial clearing and stockpiling of the first pits to be mined.
The mining operations phase is defined as the mining and transportation of the ore to the port facility
for loading, which is scheduled to commence in 2015 with a 23-year life of mine. The operations
phase of the Project is defined in the following stages:
mining of limonite and saprolite ore from each individual pit including activities such as access
roads, topsoil handling, removal of overburden/waste to recently mined pits, and the mining and
movement of ore to stockpiles within 1 km of the mined pit
loading and transportation of stockpiled ore by the long haul fleet for transport to the port
unloading of ore at the port site to separate stockpiles for limonite and saprolite (saprolite is
placed on a grizzly to allow the removal of oversized material prior to stockpiling for loading
onto the barges), and
loading of ore by excavator onto the barges for delivery to the ocean-going vessels moored at the
transhipment locations off-shore.
The progressive rehabilitation and decommissioning/closure process for the Project is planned as:
progressive rehabilitation during operations, which include the grading of mined out areas to
blend with the surrounding landscape and revegetation (including spreading of topsoil and other
growing medium) to allow regeneration of vegetation to a natural state
5.2.2.1
Mine Areas
The mine area features include:
stockpile areas
PAGE 12
wastewater facilities
administration areas.
5.2.2.2
ore stockpiles
5.2.2.3
Ports
The port facility features include:
stockpile areas
transhipping locations
maintenance workshops
PAGE 13
5.2.2.4
General Infrastructure
The Project general infrastructure areas include:
5.2.3
mine industrial areas (MIA) including workshop and vehicle maintenance areas, vehicle
washdown areas, wastewater facilities, water reticulation, power and communications, fuel and
hazardous chemicals (reagents) storage facilities. and administration buildings
accommodation camps
service roads
landfill site
communications.
Project Stakeholders
5.2.3.1
Proponent
The Project Proponent is SMM Solomon Limited. SMM Solomon is based in Honiara, Solomon
Islands, and is engaged in the exploration and development of mineral deposits within the Solomon
Islands. SMM Solomon proposes to develop deposits of lateritic nickel that it has identified during
exploration on tenements awarded to the company on Choiseul and Santa Isabel Islands within the
Solomon Islands.
The Project will be funded through a potential joint venture of the private company and Japanese
government.
5.2.3.2
Government
The Environment and Conservation Division, of the Ministry of Environment, Climate Change,
Disaster Management and Meteorology, will be assessing the approval application for the EIS and
undertaking audits for compliance with the EMP.
Other Solomon Islands government agencies potentially relevant to the EMP implementation include
the:
Ministry of Mines and Energy that deals with the rights for and development of mineral resources
Ministry of Commerce, Industries, Labour and Immigration that deals with work permits,
employment rights, and health and safety requirements
Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources that monitor and establish management development
plans, giving responsibility for the protection of reefs to provincial governments
Ministry of Health and Medical Services, with delegation to local provinces, that regulates the
prevention and containment of diseases and malaria, building safety, and provision and
maintenance of sanitary conditions
Ministry of Lands, Survey and Housing, that regulates land acquisitions, registration and
relocation processes
Ministry of Forestry
PAGE 14
5.2.3.3
Choiseul Provincial Executive that can declare a culturally significant site to be a Protected Place.
Landholders/Communities
A number of communities on Choiseul Island may be potentially affected by the Project. The degree
to which they are affected depends on the environmental/social value being considered. The
relevant communities will be consulted when required, depending on the issue.
5.2.3.4
Non-Government Organisations
The following non-government organisations have been identified as having a potential interest or
presence in the Project area:
AusAid
Red Cross
World Bank
Catholic Church
Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ)
United Church
PAGE 15
5.2.4
Environmental Policy
SMM Solomon is committed to protecting and enhancing the natural environmental values within
and surrounding the Project area.
SMM Solomon is also committed to implementing the ICMM Sustainable Development Framework,
which involves a number of relevant principles including:
5.2.5
upholding fundamental human rights and respecting cultures, customs and values in dealings
with employees and others who are affected by activities
implementing risk management strategies based on valid data and sound science
contributing to the social, economic and institutional development of the communities in which
they operate
changes in landform
PAGE 16
Terrestrial ecology:
habitat fragmentation and resulting edge effects reducing habitat value of forest adjacent
development and facilities
generation of excessive noise pushing fauna into interior habitat, reducing fauna usage and
disturbing fauna behaviour
accidental introduction of invasive species, weed, feral animals and/or exotic species
Air quality:
dust emissions from road vehicles agitating soil while hauling material on unsealed roads.
Noise:
Cultural heritage:
Waste:
land and water contamination from solid non-hazardous and hazardous waste spills
impacts to public health and safety and flora and fauna species.
Transport:
vegetation clearing during construction causing loss of terrestrial habitat and impacts to
aquatic habitats through erosion and sedimentation.
Social values:
population increase
increased population leads to increased demand for social services and infrastructure
influx of workers from other countries/islands may influence cultural and traditional norms
PAGE 17
workers may exhibit anti-social behaviours disrupting island life and causing tension/conflict
adverse visual changes to landscape, skyline and sea from selected viewpoints
impacts to customary land ownership resulting from the legal determination of tribe and clan
boundaries, the influx of new residents and the increased demand for land
impacts to subsistence horticulture resulting from the loss of existing and potential garden
areas, the introduction of new crops and the increased demand for crops
impacts to hunting, fishing and shellfish gathering resulting from population influx, the loss
of access, the loss of habitat and decrease in availabilities
a potential reduction in suitable sites for new villages within the tenement
PAGE 18
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.1.1
Environmental Values
5.3.1.1.1
The Solomon Islands is an archipelago composed of six major islands forming a northwest-southeast
trending double chain of islands. Most of the islands and their corresponding geology are derived
from volcanic activities and crustal uplift due to the presence of active subduction and collision
zones between the Indo-Australian and Pacific Tectonic Plates.
Choiseul Island is characterised by undulating to moderately steep slopes with elevations ranging
from 100 m to 300 m. Numerous fast flowing rivers incise the ridges and converge to channels
draining to the coast. High peaks are formed through triple junctions of ridges, while an extinct
volcanic cone, rising to a height of 450 m, is found in Keretavalo, northwest of Lokoso. There are
rolling to steep gradients (varying from 18% to 50%) in the northeastern portion of the tenement.
The inherent geohazards identified for the Choiseul tenement, in order of decreasing probability, are
topsoil loss, land use or geomorphologic change, slope failure, earthquake, tsunami, and volcanic
activity.
5.3.1.1.2
Geology
The Choiseul tenement is predominantly composed of two geologic rock units, namely the Siruka
Ultramafics (approximately 70% of the area) and volcanic rocks (Choiseul Schists, Vosa Lavas and
Vosa Schists). The ultramafic and volcanic sequences are overlain by limonite. Miocene to Recent
reef-derived limestone formations are found in the eastern portion of the island towards Lokoso.
Regional studies for the central islands of the country indicate the presence of major normal faults
and horst-and-graben blocks that are, in turn, associated with the accretion of ultramafic rocks and
the regional impacts of the bounding subduction zones in Solomon Islands.
5.3.1.1.3
Choiseul Island has 13 soil associations, seven of which are found in the tenement area. The
underlying rock types dictate the composition and characteristics of the soils, therefore the seven soil
associations are associated with the Siruka Ultramafics, Vosa Schists, Vosa Lavas, Choiseul Schists,
and Kumboro (Mountain) Volcanics. In terms of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
soil taxonomy orders, the majority of these soils fall within the Inceptisols and Oxisols (lateritic soils)
groups. These soils are best supporting forest or other native vegetation, with limited cropping
potential.
The land capability of the Choiseul tenement area falls under the USDA Classes VI and VII, which
pertains to soils that are unsuitable for agriculture and are restricted to forest usage.
A coastal soil association, found in saline foreshore swamps, lagoons, and estuaries that are
characterised as low energy environments with organic matter accumulations, are considered as
potential acid sulphate soils.
PAGE 19
Soil profiles are generally thick and well-developed in areas with flat to gentle topographies and
where erosion rates are low. Thin soil profiles are typical of areas with steep topography and high
erosion rates, such that soil development is limited.
The weathered characteristic of most soil groups on the island, as well as the general lack of
nutrients, indicate that the soils are also highly erodible. Clays characteristic of volcanic rocks and
corresponding alteration products of ultramafic rocks found in the Project site, stream deposits, and
hydrothermally altered rocks are highly prone to weathering and are consequently highly erodible.
Based on geo-accumulation index results from nine drill holes, geo-concentrations of chromium,
nickel, iron, cadmium and cobalt are highly enriched in the area, being naturally sourced from the
Siruka Ultramafics and volcanic units. Geo-accumulation values for other metals, such as aluminium
and manganese, fall within the moderately polluted to practically unpolluted ranges.
5.3.1.2
Potential Impacts
The following potential impacts have been identified in association with land, geology, geohazards
and soils at the Project site:
short-term change in land use for areas where temporary construction camps, waste containment
areas and other temporary infrastructure will be erected
permanent land use change in areas where the mines, roads, water supply dam, and landfill will
be located
loss of topsoil
soil erosion and sedimentation impacting water quality and downstream habitats
contamination of groundwater and surface water, ecosystems, failure of soil structure, and
corrosion of construction materials due to the release of sulphuric acid from the disturbance of
acid sulphate soils
soil contamination from hydrocarbon or other spills or leaks, improper disposal of construction
wastes such as wood and metal, and improper disposal of other solid and domestic wastes
disruption of work, and health and safety hazard, due to potential ash falls during a volcanic
eruption.
Disturbed land areas and slopes are progressively restored as close as possible to pre-mining
conditions.
Landslide and slope failure hazards are engineered so that risk is minimised.
Take all reasonable and practicable measures to minimise short and long-term soil erosion and
the adverse effects of sediment transport.
5.3.1.3
5.3.1.4
Management Objectives
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts to land, geology and soil hazards, and associated
facilities, staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-2.
PAGE 20
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Short-term or permanent
change in landform
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Reduce short-term
impacts of landform
changes.
Reduce long-term
impacts of landform
changes.
Management Action
Loss of topsoil
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Monitor progress of
rehabilitated areas in terms of
plant growth and retention of
topsoil.
Monitor management of topsoil
on-site and plant growth within
rehabilitated areas.
PAGE 21
NA
NA
NA
Port
Disturbance of acid
sulphate soils
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Infrastructure
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Minimise disturbance
of acid sulphate soils
during port
construction.
NA
NA
Monitor progress of
regenerating areas in terms of
plant growth and retention of
topsoil.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Monitoring of pH levels in
PAGE 22
NA
Criteria
Management Action
Soil contamination is
prevented, or
minimised and
contained.
Landslides in susceptible
areas
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 23
NA
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
Certification of Emergency
Response Plan by Project
Manager is a Hold Point for
commencement of on-site
project activities.
PAGE 24
NA
Results of the analyses will
be integrated in the final
design of Project facilities
and mining methods.
NA
Regular internal audits of the
Emergency Response Plan
will be undertaken to inform
and update procedures.
5.3.2
5.3.2.1
Environmental Values
5.3.2.1.1
Surface Freshwater
The quality of freshwaters within the Choiseul Island survey area was high. Water quality parameters
were generally within the applicable water quality guidelines, indicating that the streams and rivers
within the survey area generally have clean and clear water. Turbidity was high in the Roke River on
one occasion during monitoring, and was likely linked to the proximity of a logging road near to this
water quality monitoring site. The Project site is subject to high erosion potential due to its steep
terrain and intense rainfall (Golder 2012).
Metals were detected in the water at all sites in varying concentrations, which are generally naturally
abundant elements. Concentrations of nitrogen and nickel were observed to be high at more than
half of the survey sites. The high concentration of nickel is likely due to the natural abundance of
nickel in the ultramafic soils and rocks of the Project area.
Significant variation in both flow velocity and volume was observed during monitoring. This
variability was likely caused by the frequent heavy rain showers that occur on Choiseul Island.
Water quality was primarily related to adjacent land-use (e.g. clearing for village gardens and
commercial logging), human activities (e.g. waste disposal), and site-specific geology (i.e. mineralrich soils). Proximity to cleared areas is considered to be the main influence on freshwater quality on
Choiseul Island.
Sediment quality within the freshwater survey area was generally good; concentrations of nutrients
were generally low, and concentrations of metals and non-metal inorganics were generally low at
most sites. However, sediment quality was poor in parts of the Katulae River, Olenganda River,
Nombe River and Siruka River, where the concentrations of several metals were high.
5.3.2.1.2
Groundwater
Depth to groundwater was measured in each of nine monitoring wells over two rounds of sampling,
and was observed to be within the range of 3.81 to 10.75 m from the top of well. Based on field
recorded data, the static water level (SWL) in monitoring wells MW01, MW06 and MW07 fluctuated
by 3.62m, 3.55m and 2.35m respectively, while the rest of the monitoring wells have water
fluctuations not greater than 0.6m.
For groundwater quality, the following results have been found through in-situ testing and laboratory
analysis:
The pH values were generally within the guideline ranges of 6.5 to 8.5, which means that the
pH of groundwater is within the acceptable limits for drinking water (optimal for streams and
groundwater with reference to the ANZECC water quality and Australian Drinking Water
Standards (ADWS) guidelines).
Concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) in all nine sampling locations were within the
acceptable range, being rated as good to excellent (<500 mg/L) water quality in terms of the
ANZECC and ADWS guidelines.
PAGE 25
Low dissolved oxygen (DO) percent saturation was recorded from all monitoring locations in the
two sampling events. The recorded average values range from 3.07 mg/L to 7.40 mg/L, which
are within the normal range for groundwater according to the ADWS (however no limits were
prescribed in the guidelines). This is due to the lack of interaction or influence of the atmosphere
with the water table.
When compared to the typical alkalinity range in groundwater (as reported in ANZECCARMCANZ 2000 trigger values), MW01, MW05 through MW07, MW09 and potable water
samples from Sivai, Simbe and Siruka were below the range of 50-1,000 mg/L CaCO3.
All metals above detectable levels were generally compliant with the ADWS except for
chromium and nickel. Chromium exceeded the ADWS limit at Station MW03. Nickel exceeded
the ADWS limit at Stations MW03, MW04, MW05, MW06, MW08, MW09, and the Simbe and
Siruka sources. Concentrations of arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, molybdenum, selenium, tin,
vanadium and mercury were below the detectable analysis limit.
5.3.2.1.3
Marine Water
The quality of marine surface waters within the survey area was moderate to high, and typical of
tropical inshore waters. Turbidity in marine waters was generally low during the baseline survey.
However, turbidity was higher following periods of heavy rainfall, particularly in the eastern bay of
Ologholata Harbour. The Nombe River, and rivers draining into western Ologosoa Harbour,
delivered the highest sediment loads to marine waters within the survey area. Sediment-laden run-off
from rivers was likely due to upstream clearing for logging roads and village gardens.
Metals were detected at all sites in varying concentrations, which are generally naturally abundant
elements. The concentration of metals was relatively high in surface waters in the eastern bay of
Ologholata Harbour (particularly copper) and in the eastern bay of Ologosoa Harbour (particularly
aluminium, copper, iron, vanadium and zinc). Concentrations of nutrients in the eastern bay of
Ologholata Harbour were also high, and were likely to be linked to sediment-laden runoff from
rivers.
Marine surface water quality of the survey area was primarily related to rainfall and site-specific
geology; although land-use (e.g. clearing for village gardens and commercial logging) and human
activities (e.g. waste disposal) had influenced the water quality at some sites.
The quality of marine sediments within the survey area was generally good. However, sediment
quality was moderately poor in the eastern bay of Ologholata Harbour and in eastern Ologosoa
Harbour due to high concentrations of nutrients and various metals in the sediment.
5.3.2.1.4
Community Water
The villages that were surveyed for the community water study include Kesa, Rereo, Kava, Suri,
Siruka, Paleo, Rokoso, Ghogombe, Sibe, Viviruni, Taora, Sivai, Makangga, Boeboe, Tabakale, and
Posarae. Those villages located downstream of the tenement are potentially affected areas, however
some villages included in the survey are a considerable distance from the Project and unlikely to be
impacted.
The domestic water requirements of the communities in Choiseul Island are supplied mainly from
nearby rivers or streams. Water from the streams is either conveyed to communal standpipes by
gravity or fetched from the streams using containers. Rivers or streams supply 80% of the domestic
water needs. Other sources include the rainwater catchment system that supplies 15% of the water
requirement, and groundwater (springs) that supply the remaining 5%. There are no artesian
(groundwater) wells in the villages. Most of the villages do not have sanitary latrines.
PAGE 26
Distance of communities from stream water sources is between 200 m to 1 km and accessed by
foot. Typically, a water storage is built by constructing a weir or small dam on a stream. A high
density polyethylene pipe is inserted into the wall or dam to convey the water by gravity to the
village downstream.
In some villages, the water is further conveyed by a distribution system consisting of communal
standpipes shared by 3 to 5 households. Most standpipes are fitted with valves or tap to turn off
the flow when water is not needed, however some do not have valves so water flows freely.
Other villagers get water directly from a stream by simply dipping and filling their containers
with water.
The stream water supply sources easily become turbid or silty when it rains.
Some village supplies do not have substantial storages, thus the adequacy of supply depends on
rainfall. Some sources dry up during long dry periods (such as El Nio events) and the villagers
have to rely on alternate water sources that are often farther from the village (Hatch 2010).
Collection of water in storage tanks from rooftops (rainwater harvesting) is practiced in some
villages to supplement sources, however this practice is not widespread potentially due to the
cost. Some of the villages have rainwater tanks with rainwater collected from the roof through a
pipe connected to the tank. Although this water source is limited to rainy days, it is an alternative
source during extreme weather conditions when the stream sources are turbid and contaminated
by silt/sediment runoff.
The analysed bio-physical parameters were within the World Health Organisation Guidelines for
Drinking Water Quality (WHO-GDWQ) limits. The concentrations of chemical pollutants (e.g. heavy
metals) were also within their respective WHO-GDWQ guideline value, except for the sample in
Tabakale, which slightly exceeded the WHO-GDWQ guideline value for aluminium. In the absence
of anthropogenic activities that could possibly contribute aluminium, it is possible that this metal is
naturally occurring either within the vicinity or upstream of the sampling site.
All the water samples, except the filtered water from SMM Solomons Siruka camp tested positive for
E. coli. The bacterial test results of 12 samples analysed indicate that considerable populations of
coliform bacteria were present in the samples. The WHO-GDWQ specifies that E. coli must not be
detected in any sample, thus the samples are considered not fit for drinking.
Trace concentrations of total and dissolved barium, chromium, manganese, nickel and iron were
detected in some samples, however the concentrations were below the WHO-GDWQ.
At the time of sampling, most of the community water sources of Choiseul Island passed the WHOGDWQ limits for hazardous substances except for the sample from Tabalake that had relatively high
aluminium (total and dissolved). This may be attributable to background concentration in the water
as a result of the underlying geology and sediment quality.
5.3.2.2
Potential Impacts
Construction and operation of the mines, port and supporting infrastructure has the potential to result
in the following impacts to surface water quality and in turn aquatic ecology:
increased turbidity and subsequent sedimentation due to soil erosion from clearing and
earthworks, and port construction and operation activities
PAGE 27
loss of catchment area and changes to flow regimes due to the construction of the nickel mine,
water supply dams, ponds for sediment capture and supporting infrastructure, including
installation of waterway crossings
nutrient enrichment
Port designs are yet to be finalised, and consequently it is not possible to determine the requirement
for dredging; however discussion of dredge-related impacts and their management is provided to
assist the reader understand that, should dredging be required, it is likely that impacts may be readily
assessed and effectively managed.
Potential impact to groundwater quality and flow may have affects to people and/or the environment.
Contaminated groundwater, which may also flow towards surface waters, can impact aquatic
ecosystems, fishing and recreational activities of the villagers, and human health through fish
ingestion and dermal contact. The following potential impacts to groundwater have been identified
from the Project:
chemicals of potential concern (COPC), such as fuel, industrial lubricants, motor oils, paints and
other hydrocarbons and hazardous wastes, may be accidentally spilled, infiltrate soil, and
contaminate groundwater quality
ground (soil, overburden, mineral deposits) stripping and excavations may temporarily alter
groundwater flow.
The potential impacts to water quality, amenity and flow from the proposed mining facilities and
activities on the community water supply are identified as:
Contamination of surface and groundwater by effluent, litter, food scraps and other solid or
liquid wastes, mine drainage and pathogens during construction and operation.
Increased competition for water resources due to various water requirements in the construction
sites, camps, mine industrial areas and mine operations.
Reduction in quantity of safe water sources for domestic uses due to introduction of
contaminants from mine activities and operations, making the water unfit for drinking and
household use.
PAGE 28
Competition for water sources and reduction in flow or quantity of stream and spring water
sources due to siltation caused by earthworks, diversion of watercourses, and related activities
during construction and operation.
Changes to flow regimes through drainage modifications made during construction and
operation stages, including constructed instream barriers or diversions and construction of the
water supply dam for the Project.
5.3.2.3
5.3.2.4
Management Objectives
Take all reasonable and practicable measures to minimise short and long-term soil erosion and
the adverse effects of sediment transport.
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts to surface water and groundwater quality and flow,
and associated facilities, staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-3.
PAGE 29
Infrastructure
Construction
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
NA 2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
2
Operation
Port
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Stage 1 practices to control erosion and sedimentladen runoff generated from small catchment
areas and close to source (e.g. drainage ditches
Hold Point is a point during the Project where works shall not commence or continue without verification or sign-off of the relevant issue by the relevant manager/supervisor.
Not applicable to this management action
PAGE 30
Movement of water is
controlled through
sites.
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
with appropriate armouring, clean and sedimentladen water diversions, chutes with aprons or
stilling basins to convey flows down steep slopes,
check dams, pocket ponds 3, infiltration trenches
and ponds 4, and revegetation).
Stage 2 practices to control water and sediment
generated from larger catchment areas (e.g.
sediment ponds and dams).
An Emergency Response Team will be established
(through the Emergency Response Plan) for taking
action in emergency scenarios, such as channel bank
failure, sediment basin breach, slope slide or other
major failure of erosion and sediment control
structure.
Appropriate clean and dirty water drainage structures
will be designed and constructed to convey, and be
structurally stable in, the following average recurrence
interval (ARI) event, for example:
1 in 2 year for <12 month design life
1 in 5 year for 12-24 month design life, and
1 in 10 year for >24 month design life.
Slope lengths will be minimised to limit concentration
and acceleration of overland flow, where possible.
Temporary measures to be implemented during
construction and mining operations to minimise the
volume of sediment-laden stormwater include:
NA
NA
NA
NA
3
4
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Pocket ponds are small-sized, coarse sediment traps intended to infiltrate water into the ground but not retain water or fine sediments.
Infiltration trenches and ponds assist with infiltration of mine runoff to the ground, which reduces sediments and metals entering waterways.
PAGE 31
Criteria
Management Action
Erosion control
measures in place prior
to clearing and
earthworks
commencing.
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Adequate surface
protection within,
adjacent to, and in
future disturbance
areas.
operation progresses.
NA
PAGE 32
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Design criteria to be
established for
suspended solids
concentration for basin
water quality up to a
design rainfall event.
Management Action
Monitoring
NA
PAGE 33
Minimal direct
sediment input to
natural watercourses
and riparian zones.
Criteria
NA
NA
Monitoring
Management Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Minimal erosion or
scour (wash-out) from
concentrated flows.
PAGE 34
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Criteria
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Reuse of captured
water is maximised
where practicable.
NA
PAGE 35
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
1 in 7 to reduce erosion.
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Maintain as necessary.
PAGE 36
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
PAGE 37
NA
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
restored.
Where applicable, dam embankments will be
revegetated using grasses and ground cover vegetation
only, as roots of trees and shrubs can compromise the
embankment stability.
A water quality and flow monitoring program will be
undertaken to assess the accuracy of predicted
impacts, inform management of potential issues, and
facilitate responsive action. Monitoring program
should be designed to detect changes in in-situ water
quality, water flow, and the concentration of potential
contaminants in the water column and sediment, and
compliment freshwater and marine ecology
monitoring where practical.
Monitoring of turbidity in streams will be undertaken
at nominated locations downstream of ground
disturbance (e.g. clearing and earthworks) and when
constructing permanent or temporary stream
crossings.
NA
NA
It is recommended that
monitoring be undertaken during
both construction and operation,
and after operation until
conditions returns to background
conditions (i.e. where established
by baseline surveys and/or prior
to disturbance).
PAGE 38
subsequent sedimentation in
marine waters
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
without a Dredge
Management Plan
being developed.
Dredge or disturbance
area is defined by
appropriate control
measure.
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Implement marine
water quality
monitoring program.
activities occur.
NA
NA
Monitoring of stream flows as per
monitoring program to be referred
PAGE 39
Groundwater flow is
maintained as much as
possible.
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Community water
supply is maintained.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 40
Criteria
Management Action
No use of potential
contaminants prior to
Handling and Spill
Management Plan
being in place.
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
PAGE 41
NA
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Maintain machinery
and vehicles to prevent
spills.
Minimise reduction of
groundwater quality.
area.
A self-contained secure fenced area with purpose built
facilities will be constructed in the MIA for all
hazardous and chemical materials (flammables, acids,
alkalis and oxidants).
Vessel refuelling will be restricted to designated
wharves with suitable access and spill prevention
facilities.
Heavy equipment fuelling will be restricted to a
designated facility located within the heavy
equipment manoeuvring area and adjacent the haul
road access to the MIA.
Light vehicle fuelling will be restricted to a designated
facility located near the mine operations vehicle
parking area.
Regular checks are made to machinery/vehicles for
evidence of leaks and condition of hydraulic hoses
and seals.
A washdown area is provided for light vehicles and
machinery.
Fuel storage (and other potentially hazardous
substance storages) will be bermed/bunded to contain
any leaks or spillages and prevent discharge to soil or
water.
Should a contaminant spill occur, the following
remediation methods may be employed:
pump and treat system
multi-phase extraction system
biological remediation
monitored natural attenuation, or
dig, haul and disposal of contaminated materials.
A groundwater monitoring program will be
established prior to construction, in accordance with
baseline survey methods and analysis undertaken.
This monitoring program may also include the
groundwater and leachate monitoring to be
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Records of machinery/vehicle
inspections are to be kept.
Monitor effectiveness of
remediation method and initiate
monitoring of land or water
contamination if necessary.
PAGE 42
Nutrient enrichment
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Minimise reduction of
community water
supply quality.
Release of nutrients to
water is minimised.
NA
Monitoring of sediments in
accordance with marine water
quality monitoring program.
NA
PAGE 43
Operation
Infrastructure
Port
Stage
Construction
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Waste Management
Plan to be in place
prior to commencing
works.
Minimise impact to
community water
supply from litter and
Adequately assess
impacts of altered
hydrodynamics.
Management Action
Criteria
Monitoring
If necessary, a monitoring
program will be developed and
implemented prior to the
operation stage.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 44
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
waste.
Avoid impacts to
protected areas.
PAGE 45
criteria.
NA
NA
NA
5.3.3
Aquatic Ecology
The environmental values, potential impacts and risks, and mitigation measures for freshwater and
marine ecology are summarised in this section, and further described in Chapter 4 and the Impact
Assessment Report Marine Ecology and Impact Assessment Report Freshwater Surface Water
Ecology.
5.3.3.1
Environmental Values
5.3.3.1.1
Freshwater
The environmental values of freshwater ecosystems within the Choiseul Island survey area were
high, and consistent with those of the wider Solomon Islands region. High environmental values
were primarily related to the perennial nature of most waterways, which provides environmental
flow and typically good water quality and connectivity for the movement of aquatic biota.
Streams were characterised by intact riparian vegetation, limited erosion of bed and banks, stable
sediment, high habitat diversity, and a lack of exotic species. The substrate at most sites was
dominated by boulders, cobbles and pebbles, with some bedrock and gravel.
Aquatic flora was uncommon. Waterways within the survey area supported a high diversity of
aquatic fauna, including a number of fish species. Aquatic macroinvertebrate communities of the
Solomon Islands are diverse, with many endemic species.
There is one locally protected area that includes freshwater habitats; the Guere Forest Conservation
and Marine Protected Area is situated on the Nguare River on the southern coast of Choiseul Island. .
Local villagers also identified an important hunting and fishing area that extends into the western part
of the tenement, the Ruruvai Hunting/Fishing Area, which fringes the Oaka Harbour.
5.3.3.1.2
Marine Waters
Marine ecosystems of the survey area are dominated by extensive mangrove forests and coral reefs,
together with rocky and sandy shorelines, seagrass meadows and bare substrate. These marine
ecosystems support diverse flora and fauna and have high environmental value. During the baseline
survey, habitat condition was mostly good with some degradation due to human influences (e.g.
mangrove clearing and some siltation of reefs due to sediment-laden runoff from rivers downstream
of logging tracks).
There are at least 40 species of marine flora and fauna listed on the International Union for
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species that occur, or may occur on occasion,
in the survey area, including:
six reptile species, including five turtle species and one crocodile species
three marine mammal species, including two whale species and one dugong species.
There are several corals listed on the IUCN Red List as critically endangered (e.g. Acropora spp.) that
may occur in the survey area.
No known exotic biota were recorded.
PAGE 46
Villagers at Choiseul Island rely on marine ecosystems for food and income. During the baseline
survey, local villagers identified several important marine areas in and adjacent to the Project area,
including:
the Guere Forest Conservation Area and Marine Protected Area (local landowners are working
with the Natural Resources Development Foundation, World Wildlife Foundation and the
Solomon Islands Government to protect this area)
the Tabubiru Soi Conservation Island, which has been set aside as a refuge for turtles, saltwater
crocodiles, fish and trochus shells
Muzo Island and Nganasa protected areas offshore of Pelolata Island, which have been set aside
as a refuge for turtles and birds.
Additional conservation features such as turtle nesting habitats, bait fishing grounds and fish
spawning areas were identified by the LLCTC.
5.3.3.2
Potential Impacts
Potential impacts of the Project on freshwater ecosystems were considered to include:
increased turbidity (and suspended solids) and subsequent sedimentation due to vegetation
clearing, earthworks and construction of waterway crossings
increased turbidity and consequent sedimentation due to port construction activities, including
excavation, dredging (if required), spoil handling, pile driving and reclamation
loss of catchment area and changes to flow regimes due to the construction of mine areas, water
supply dams, ponds for sediment capture and supporting infrastructure, including installation of
waterway crossings and consequent impacts to aquatic fauna passage
loss of habitat for aquatic fauna due to vegetation clearing and earthworks
direct loss of marine habitat through reclamation (and dredging if required) for the port facilities,
and indirect loss of marine habitat due to altered hydrodynamics in marine waters adjacent to
port facilities
spills of hydrocarbons and other potential contaminants from operation of vehicles, mine
machinery, and transport or handling of materials/substances (including nickel ore)
nutrient enrichment and release of other contaminants through stormwater runoff. discharge of
waste water, and disturbance of nutrient-rich marine sediment around port areas
increased noise, vibration and human activity within and around the port facilities
increased leaching of antifoul paints due to increased vessel traffic around port areas
increased mosquito and biting midge populations due to creation of new breeding habitat
PAGE 47
introduction of litter and waste into rivers, streams and marine waters
increased fishing pressure due to increased harvesting of marine resources by local villagers to
sell to mining camps
There is also a potential positive impact in the gain of artificial habitat for marine biota within the
port facilities.
5.3.3.3
5.3.3.4
Management Objectives
Take all reasonable and practicable measures to minimise short and long-term soil erosion and
the adverse effects of sediment transport.
Spills are contained and remediated with no adverse impacts to aquatic ecosystems
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts to freshwater and marine ecology, and associated
facilities, staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-4.
PAGE 48
Construction
NA
Minimise impacts to
freshwater aquatic
fauna.
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Infrastructure
Criteria
Port
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
Minimise loss of
marine habitat.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 49
NA
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
NA
Nutrient enrichment
NA
NA
NA
Disturbance of acid
sulphate soil or other
contaminated sediments
Acid mine drainage
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 50
Altered marine
hydrodynamics and
subsequent flushing,
erosion and sedimentation
Increased noise, vibration
and human activity
Antifoul leaching
Adequately assess
impacts of altered
hydrodynamics.
NA
Minimise extent of
mosquito and midge
breeding habitat.
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Infrastructure
Stage
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Minimise the
introduction of marine
pests.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 51
Impacts to species of
conservation significance
Operation
Infrastructure
Stage
Construction
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Reduce impacts
associated with
increased fishing
pressure.
Reduce impacts to
spotted flagtails.
Criteria
Minimise impacts to
threatened marine
species.
Minimise indirect
impacts to protected
areas.
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 52
NA
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
sediment quality.
Impacts to aquatic habitat and biota within protected
areas will be minimised through protection of
upstream, coastal and marine water and sediment
quality, as provided for in above actions.
PAGE 53
5.3.4
Terrestrial Ecology
The environmental values, potential impacts and risks, and mitigation measures for terrestrial ecology
are summarised in this section, and further described in Chapter 4 and the Impact Assessment Report
Terrestrial Ecology.
5.3.4.1
Environmental Values
5.3.4.1.1
Flora
The vegetation within the Project tenement remains relatively intact with over 50% of the areas still
covered with old growth forest. Some portions of the tenement are disturbed areas currently being
utilised by the local communities as gardens and/or source of logs for domestic use, or are
regenerating forest following logging concessions (covers about 6,264 ha or 33% of the tenement).
Two major vegetation communities have been identified within the tenement:
Forest over ultramafic/ultrabasic rocks, or ironwood forest (represents about 55% or 10,561 ha of
the tenement). Xanthostemon melanoxylon (ironwood) occurs as the dominant species within
either monotypic (single species) stands of small-statured trees or freely intermixed as large
canopy trees with Gymnostoma sp., Dacrydium sp., Podocarpus sp. and two distinct species of
palms (Hydriastele hombronii and Actinorhtyis calapparia).
Lowland rainforest from coastal flat areas extending to the lowland ridges or hills (500 m above
sea level) (represents about 41% or 7,835 ha of the tenement). Mainly composed of Astronidium
sp., Finschia sp. and other readily discernible elements of lowland forest species. At ecotonal
boundaries between forest over ultrabasic/ultramafic rocks and lowland forest, Xanthostemon
sp., Hydriastele sp. and Gymnostoma sp. were still present, but were found in much reduced
numbers. Its low lying distribution makes it more prone to disturbance, therefore regrowth and
secondary growth areas are common.
A total of 125 flora species were identified from the 145 specimens collected within the tenement.
A single threatened species (Calophyllum obscurum) based on the 2011 IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species was recorded from the Project area. Moreover, two possibly new orchid species
(Diplocaulobium sp. and Dendrobium sp.) that may be new to science were observed.
5.3.4.1.2
Fauna
The fauna diversity within the project site is relatively high with a total of 88 species recorded (13
amphibians, 20 reptiles, 46 birds and nine mammals). Recorded species represent at least 39% of the
species known to occur on Choiseul Island. Most of these species are classed as very common,
common, fairly common, moderately common and abundant. Three IUCN listed threatened species,
Palmatorappia solomonis (Solomon Islands palm frog), Haliaeetus sanfordi (Solomon sea eagle) and
Nesasio solomonensis (fearful owl) were also confirmed to occur within the tenement.
There are at least 11 confirmed threatened fauna species within Choiseul Island. Of these, three were
recorded by this study within the tenement, and five species (i.e. three very likely and two possibly
present species) have the potential to occur on Choiseul Island and the tenement based on known
range distribution and habitat preference.
The tenement exhibits high endemicity with 37 of the recorded species (42% of the total) and two of
the recorded subspecies restricted to the Solomon Islands in distribution. The remaining 47 recorded
species (54% of the total) are native to the Solomon Islands but are not endemics. Moreover, two
species are introduced.
PAGE 54
There are 35 species composed of eight amphibians, nine reptiles, 10 birds and eight mammals
selected as noteworthy species. Except for 17 species with distribution extending from Bismarck
Archipelago to Bougainville and/or Buka, all the other selected noteworthy species are restricted
(endemic) to the Solomon Islands in distribution.
5.3.4.1.3
Protected Areas
The Guere Forest Conservation and Marine Protected Area is located at the southern extent of the
tenement. GFCMPA was established based on local community consultations and is not a declared
protected area under the Protected Areas Act 2010 of the Solomon Islands.
As a result of stakeholder mapping workshops, 10% and a 20% target options for key conservation
protection and management areas have been identified (by TNC through the Ridges to Reefs
Conservation Plan for Choiseul Province, Solomon Islands (TNC, 2010) in partnership with the
LLCTC). As a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Solomon Islands is
required to set aside at least 10% of their country in protected areas to slow the global loss of
biodiversity.
5.3.4.2
Potential Impacts
The key impacts to terrestrial ecological values identified were:
habitat fragmentation
edge effects
5.3.4.3
increased artificial light at night that can potentially have adverse effects on wildlife
vehicle strike of wildlife due to new and increased road lengths requiring fauna to cross and
the increased numbers of vehicles operating
dust emissions
erosion impacting riparian habitats due to high rainfall combined with earthworks activities
such as mining and excavations, construction of roads and tracks, and infrastructure
accidental introduction of invasive species, weeds, feral animals and/or exotic species.
Management Objectives
PAGE 55
5.3.4.4
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts to terrestrial ecology, and associated facilities,
staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-5.
PAGE 56
Port
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Infrastructure
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Areas of conservation
significance are
avoided where
possible.
Progressive clearing,
mining and
rehabilitation methods
are implemented.
NA
NA
PAGE 57
NA
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 58
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
PAGE 59
Internal performance of
rehabilitation will be reviewed
quarterly to half-yearly.
Rehabilitation areas will be
maintained as required to
promote establishment of
vegetation, such as suppression of
weeds.
Maintain offset areas if required
for rehabilitation, such as through
surface stabilisation, weed control
or supplementary plantings.
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
PAGE 60
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
No impacts to habitats
from contaminant
pollution.
Minimise noise
generation adjacent
habitat areas.
NA
NA
PAGE 61
Vehicle strikes
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Dust emissions
Management Action
Monitoring
NA
NA
PAGE 62
Accidental introduction of
invasive species, weed, feral
animals and/or exotic species
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 63
5.3.5
Air Quality
The environmental values, potential impacts and risks, and mitigation measures for air quality are
summarised in this section, and further described in Chapter 4 and the Impact Assessment Report
Air Quality.
5.3.5.1
Environmental Values
The Solomon Islands have relatively few sources of pollution. The majority of the population (85%)
operates on a subsistence economy of farming and fishing. The main industries are timber and
mining, with tourism as an important source of income. As such, the main sources of pollution
would be combustion emissions from the burning of solid fuels.
There are 28 sensitive receptors identified within the study area.
5.3.5.2
Potential Impacts
The CALPUFF dispersion model was used to estimate potential ground level concentrations of total
suspended particulates (TSP), particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10), particulate matter less
than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), deposited dust and heavy metals. Predicted emissions from the mining
operations are based around the proposed operational activities and publically available emission
factors. Existing environmental pollutant monitoring for Choiseul Island was also undertaken.
Potential impacts from the mining operations are based around the comparison of predicted
cumulative dust concentration at potentially affected receptors with regulatory criteria which are
aimed at protecting human health.
Construction activities are considered to be short-term and intermittent in nature. The emissions from
mining and associated operational activities are assumed to be greater than those of the construction
stage.
The primary potential impacts from the Project are considered to be dust emissions generated by:
For the preliminary modelling undertaken, exceedences of the amenity impact assessment criteria for
TSP and dust deposition were predicted primarily in the villages surrounding the port area
(designated Port C1-2). Impacts were predicted to be above the amenity criteria of 90 g/m3 for TSP
and 2 g/m2 per month for dust deposition for the village of Keva.
PAGE 64
This elevated coarse particulate impact is expected to be due to the proximity of the village to the
port and mining activities and the predominant wind direction, which would be expected to blow
winds from the mining and port activities toward the village.
The representative worst case Choiseul scenario indicated up to 5.3 g/m3 annual TSP and 0.8 g/m2
per month annual dust deposition impacting the amenity of the Makangga village.
Exposure to particulate matter has been linked to a variety of health effects, including respiratory
problems (such as coughing, aggravated asthma, chronic bronchitis) and non-fatal heart attacks.
Short-term (24-hr) elevated concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 are expected for most of the area
surrounding the Choiseul mining activities out to a distance of between 5 km to 10 km. It should be
noted that these elevated concentrations represent the worst case impacts under specific
meteorological conditions and will not occur during all time periods throughout the year.
Of the 28 receptors included in the dispersion modelling for Choiseul, 20 are predicted to
experience cumulative dust concentrations higher than the adopted PM10 24-hr criteria. An estimated
71% of the predicted occurrences of 24-hr average cumulative concentrations exceeding the criteria
occur during the wet season, suggesting a low likelihood of exceedences occurring in reality.
Long-term (annual) elevated PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were predicted to be predominantly low
with the exception of exceedences identified for the area around the C1-1 and C1-2 port areas. It
should be noted that most predicted long-term PM10 concentrations fell below 10 g/m3 (against a
criteria of 30 g/m3) with two (Keva and Kuduru) of the surrounding 28 receptor locations predicted
to exceed the long-term criteria for PM10. For the majority of villages the predicted Project
contribution to annual PM2.5 concentrations were 10% or less of the estimated existing background
annual PM2.5 concentrations.
No heavy metal concentrations (including arsenic, copper, lead, zinc, chromium, cadmium, and
nickel) are predicted to exceed the impact assessment criteria for heavy metals set by either
Queensland DERM or NSW OEH.
5.3.5.3
Management Objectives
5.3.5.4
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts to air quality, and associated facilities, staging,
monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-6.
PAGE 65
Infrastructure
Construction
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Water as needed.
NA
Operation
Port
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
No dust complaints
during construction.
No dust complaints
from mine operations.
NA
NA
NA
The moisture content at which a material is theoretically deemed to emit no dust (as per AS4156.6:2000).
PAGE 66
No dust complaints
from material haulage.
Management Action
Criteria
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
No dust complaints
from screening
operations.
needed.
If complaint received,
conduct monitoring at
sensitive receptor where
complaint originated.
NA
NA
NA
Water as needed.
Investigate appropriate
surfactants if considered
necessary.
Investigate options for
further mitigation if dust
levels high.
NA
NA
NA
NA
Monitor site conditions.
NA
Modify work practices as
needed.
PAGE 67
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
PAGE 68
5.3.6
Noise
The environmental values, potential impacts and risks, and mitigation measures for noise emissions
are summarised in this section, and further described in Chapter 4 and the Impact Assessment Report
- Noise.
5.3.6.1
Environmental Values
Sensitive receptors have been identified in the Project surrounds comprising coastal pacific villages
and facilities, including:
village dwellings, comprising single and double-storey weatherboard houses and traditional
village huts
Noise monitoring was carried out at sites over a seven day period to characterise the ambient noise
levels in the surrounding villages adjacent to or within the mining tenement. The measured noise
levels at all monitoring locations were generally similar in characteristics. The noise environment
typically comprised noise sources of birds, insects, human activity, domestic animals and weather
effects. Villages were also exposed to short periods of noise from boats and/or helicopters accessing
the village and the use of small petrol power generators.
The monitoring data presented indicates that the background noise levels are typically higher at night
than during the daytime. Short observations during the night, and advice from local representatives,
indicated that the noise levels during the night were dominated by insect noise.
Where compliance with background noise levels is demonstrated at the nearest sensitive receptor
locations, it is expected that compliance is also achieved at locations further from the mine activities.
Based on the IFC guidelines and results of the background noise monitoring, noise criteria (as
LAeq(1h) 6) for the Project have been determined as being:
Night (10 pm to 7 am): IFC maximum level = 45, or measured background + 3 dB = 45.
Therefore the lower of these criteria have been applied to the noise assessment (37 dB).
5.3.6.2
Potential Impacts
A three-dimensional noise model of the proposed project area was created in SoundPLAN (Version
7.0) environmental noise modelling software. The predicted noise emission levels from modelling
scenarios have been compared to the operational criteria.
Noise emission from mobile and fixed mining equipment during operational stage is likely to have
the most noise impact on nearby sensitive receivers. There also exists the potential for noise impacts
to surrounding sensitive receivers during the construction of all facilities and infrastructure. Less
equipment is proposed for construction than is likely to be required during operation of the mine,
therefore construction noise impacts are likely to be smaller than the forecast operational noise
levels. Equipment such as bulldozers, front end loaders and articulated trucks were predicted to
contribute the highest noise levels to nearby sensitive areas from mining operations, rigid trucks
along haul roads, as well as the grizzly screens and barges at the port.
PAGE 69
It is also noted that noise impacts on the existing acoustic environment from potential quarry
activities may be significant, and this will be assessed at the detailed design stage.
Noise emissions from mining operational activities are forecast to result in noise levels that exceed
the Project criteria at a total of five sensitive locations over the life of the mine as follows:
Boeboe and Makala were predicted to have minor exceedance, which is unlikely to have
significant impact on building occupants
Makangga was predicted to have noise levels that are clearly audible, however would still be
likely to fall within the upper limit defined by the noise level guidelines set by the IFC
Memese and Siruku were predicted to have noise levels likely to have a significant impact, with
significant treatment required to mitigate this.
One location is forecast to exceed noise criteria from port operational noise emissions at Memese,
which may have very high impacts from the operation of Port C1.1.
5.3.6.3
5.3.6.4
Management Objectives
Reduce noise emissions from the construction and operation of the Project.
Minimise risks to sensitive receptors from noise impacts from the Project.
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts from noise emissions, and associated facilities,
staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-7.
PAGE 70
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Port
Stage
Infrastructure
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 71
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
NA
If complaint received,
revise communications
protocols or their
implementation.
If noise levels considered
to be higher than usual, the
need for maintenance or
repair will be investigated.
NA
NA
NA
NA
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
No noise complaints
from mining
construction and
operations.
PAGE 72
Maintain as necessary.
NA
Criteria
Management Action
on-site.
Vehicles and plant will not be left idling unnecessarily
and will be shut down between uses.
Low noise plant and equipment will be purchased and
used where possible.
Exhausts will be fitted with suitable mufflers.
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
No noise complaints
from haulage.
NA
NA
Maintain or replace
equipment as necessary.
Machinery requiring
maintenance will not be
used on-site until repaired.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 73
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Maintain as necessary.
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
NA
Machinery requiring
maintenance will not be
used on-site until repaired.
PAGE 74
5.3.7
Cultural Heritage
The environmental values, potential impacts and risks, and mitigation measures for cultural heritage
are summarised in this section, and further described in Chapter 4 and the Impact Assessment Report
Cultural Heritage appended to the EIS.
5.3.7.1
skull sites
burial sites
skeleton sites
fort sites
sacrifice sites
ceremonial sites
Skull sites, burial sites and skeleton sites can be classified together as varieties of mortuary sites;
while fort sites are a variety of settlement sites. Sacrificial and ceremonial sites can take the form of
shrines, worship sites, spirit sites, story sites, and sometimes have material components such as stone
or coral arrangements.
Cultural heritage sites were most often located on either high topographic points of the tenement
area (ridges, peaks) or adjacent to waterways (rivers, streams). No midden sites were observed during
ground survey; however the relatively limited coastline scope, combined dense vegetation and a
history of tsunami activity have likely limited the potential for both midden observation and
preservation.
Tribes and clans consulted throughout the tenement area invariably stated that all their cultural
heritage sites were of high significance to them (Crouch 2012). However, it could be said that
mortuary sites and kesa cache sites held special significance to groups (Crouch 2012). Negotiation
regarding the management and mitigation of cultural heritage sites exists, but are subject to
subsequent tribe or clan meetings involving all members of the landowning group (Crouch 2012).
Where cultural heritage sites have been previously disturbed (generally by logging activity),
representatives indicated that the undisturbed portion of the site retained high significance, while
there was some potential to negotiate further impacts to already disturbed areas (Crouch 2012).
PAGE 75
In terms of archaeological significance, settlement sites provide high potential for yielding future
insights into the nature and antiquity of Choiseul Island cultural heritage through the likelihood of
(dateable) subsurface cultural materials (Crouch 2012). Mortuary and shell valuable sites are likewise
of high archaeological significance (Crouch 2012).
In terms of ethnographic significance, language and the oral tradition attached to cultural heritage
sites provide in-depth insights into everyday lives of the inhabitants of Choiseul Island. They are also
singularly important in identifying the origin of settlement patterns and migration of Melanesian
traditions throughout the South Pacific. As well providing a rich and complex history of the ancestors
of the inhabitants of the area, the oral histories provide a complex kinship matrix which is yet to be
explored in depth.
5.3.7.2
Potential Impacts
The following impacts to existing cultural heritage values within the tenement area have the potential
to occur during the Project:
Any mining activity within the tenement may act to further alienate the relationship of local
people to their indigenous cultural world, a process already initiated and developed through
colonialism, missionisation, and logging activities (Macdonald 2012).
Through Western influence, particularly the cash economy, people may be drawn further away
from their indigenous languages, patterns of settlement and livelihood, and increasingly towards
the externally-derived equivalents (Macdonald 2012).
The tribes and clans within SMM Solomons tenement have been, to an extent, alienated from
their indigenous culture through historical processes, and there is a very high probability that
mining activity would only deepen this process, leading to the loss of indigenous cultural
patterns (Macdonald 2012).
Should mining activity occur where there already exists a cultural heritage site, then there is the
risk that a material reminder for local people of their traditions and history may be forever
effaced (Macdonald 2012).
Disturbance, destruction or removal of cultural heritage sites may lead to the degradation of
cultural knowledge in younger generations. This may also contribute to the eventual extinction
of cultural knowledge.
Disturbance, destruction or removal of cultural heritage sites may increase the disintegration of
the social and cultural landscape within SMM Solomons tenement.
5.3.7.3
Management Objectives
Identify all known cultural heritage sites belonging to all tribes and clans within the tenement.
Avoid, where possible, all known cultural heritage sites (both tangible and intangible).
Where avoidance is not possible, manage cultural heritage sites in consultation with the tribal or
clan landowners.
PAGE 76
5.3.7.4
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts to cultural heritage, and associated facilities,
staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-8. Refer to Appendix D of this
EMP for the Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP).
PAGE 77
Infrastructure
Construction
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Port
Stage
Haulage
Irreversible damage or
disturbance of known or
unknown cultural heritage
sites
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
PAGE 78
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
PAGE 79
Site-significance matrix
Training associated with
the CHMP will be
appropriately documented
by means of a training
needs assessment, training
plan and records of training
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Impact of Western
influence, particularly the
cash economy on cultural
heritage.
Effacement of material
reminders for local people
of their traditions and
history
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
undertaken.
The process and outcomes
of salvage operation works
will be documented.
A register of trained
personnel will be
maintained.
NA
PAGE 80
Operation
Monitoring
Construction
Management Action
Infrastructure
Criteria
Port
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
PAGE 81
5.3.8
Waste Management
The environmental values, potential impacts and risks, and mitigation measures for waste
management issues are summarised in this section, and further described in Chapter 4 and the
Impact Assessment Report Waste Management.
5.3.8.1
Environmental Values
Waste can be characterised as any solid material, liquid or solid hazardous waste that is being
discarded by disposal, recycling, burning or incineration.
Non-hazardous solid waste includes the following: food, inert construction/demolition materials,
scrap metal and steel, plastics, paper/cardboard, glass, tyres, packaging materials, sewage sludge,
empty motor and hydraulic oil drums, grease, etc.
Hazardous waste shares one or more of the following qualities: ignitibility, corrosivity, reactivity, or
toxicity, or other physical, chemical, or biological characteristic that may pose a potential risk to
human health or the environment if improperly managed. The following hazardous wastes are
expected to be generated on the Project: waste oil (motor, transmission and lubrication), hydraulic
waste oil, engine coolant, paint, solvent, used oil filters, batteries, explosives, fire retardants and
extinguishers, other impacted packaging, biomedical waste, grease trap and waste from oil/water
separation unit, laboratory waste, and electronic waste.
Solid waste is an emerging problem in the Pacific Islands, however there is a general lack of baseline
data for waste. Collection systems are usually limited to urban centres and are not always consistent
or reliable. Recycling in the Pacific Islands is difficult due to high shipping costs, small recyclable
flows, and difficult operating environments for machinery. Waste disposal technology in the
Solomon Islands currently consists of open dumps, burning and incineration. Reports from site visits
to Honiara confirmed that burning of waste in empty oil drums occurred on a regular basis along
with burning of waste in the open dump in Ranadi.
It was noted on Choiseul Island that households generated a minimal amount of rubbish, most of
which was food waste. There was no regular rubbish collection nor was there a general dumping
area. Some litter was disposed of to the water and gathered at the shoreline. Waste was disposed of
through burning.
5.3.8.2
Potential Impacts
Construction and operation of the mine and associated infrastructure works will generate wastes,
which have the potential to result in the following impacts:
land and water contamination from non-hazardous and hazardous waste spills
changes in land use where required for waste storage and landfill
increase in traffic
loss and disturbance of habitat for flora and fauna, and increases in pest species
PAGE 82
5.3.8.3
5.3.8.4
litter pollution (waste that has not been properly handled, stored, transported or disposed of).
Management Objectives
Waste is managed in accordance with the hierarchy of (from most preferred to least preferred):
prevention, reduction, re-use, recycling, energy recovery, disposal.
A Waste Management Plan is developed and implemented in accordance with the Waigani
Convention.
Proper handling, transport, storage and disposal of all waste, and in particular hazardous waste.
Avoid contaminant spills through design measures, with any spills immediately contained.
Occupational health and safety procedures relating to waste management and Emergency
Response Plan are implemented.
Waste management education, training and awareness programmes implemented for all staff,
visitors and waste management workers.
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts for waste management, and associated facilities,
staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-9.
PAGE 83
Infrastructure
Construction
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Waste management
procedures in place prior
to construction
commencing.
Operation
Port
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Waste management
planning follows
hierarchy of prevention,
reduction, reuse,
recycling, energy
recovery and disposal.
PAGE 84
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
NA
PAGE 85
NA
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Waste handling
procedures are
implemented.
Waste transport
procedures are
implemented.
Waste disposal
procedures are
implemented.
Management Action
Monitoring
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 86
Visual amenity
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Minimal long-term
impacts to land use.
NA
NA
NA
Contaminated land assessment may
include groundwater and leachate
monitoring of landfill.
PAGE 87
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Increased noise
Criteria
Management Action
NA
No noise complaints
from waste operations.
Monitoring
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Where necessary,
equipment/vehicles to be fitted
with noise control devices after
purchase.
Update servicing schedule as
necessary.
Waste collection vehicles to keep
a log of start and completion
times.
Results of consultation and design
to be communicated to
stakeholders.
NA
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 88
Port
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
NA
Regular inspection of waste storage
facilities.
Monitor that waste transport staff are
appropriately trained and aware of
waste management procedures.
NA
Immediate attention to food
storage issues.
NA
NA
PAGE 89
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Criteria
Management Action
Litter pollution
Stage
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
No evidence of litter
pollution.
Monitoring
NA
NA
Record all complaints or
incidents. Regular review of
incidents and make changes to
facilities or procedures if
necessary.
NA
NA
NA
PAGE 90
5.3.9
Transportation
The environmental values, potential impacts and risks, and mitigation measures for transportation are
summarised in this section, and further described in Chapter 4 and the Impact Assessment Report Transportation.
5.3.9.1
Environmental Values
There is little existing transportation infrastructure on Choiseul Island. Much of the 123 km of road
network is in poor condition, as are the majority of the 19 public wharves.
Solomon Airlines operates scheduled air services to airstrips at Choiseul Bay (near the administrative
centre of Taro) and Kagau Island. There are no public roads, wharves or airstrips in the vicinity of the
Project area. Logging tracks are relatively widespread across Choiseul Island, but these are generally
not well constructed and are therefore subject to erosion and deterioration over time.
5.3.9.2
Potential Impacts
The proposed Project transportation infrastructure will comprise an ore haulage, mine, bench and
facility access and service road network and port facilities (C1.1 and C1.2) at two locations. The port
will incorporate ore handling, export infrastructure, handling and storage facilities for general cargo,
and personnel transfer on and off-site.
The potential impacts associated with the construction and operation of this transportation
infrastructure are as follows:
erosion of soil and sedimentation downslope of areas cleared for construction of roads, leading
to increased turbidity of fresh and marine waters and impacts to aquatic habitat downstream
increased turbidity of marine systems due to dredging (if required), excavation, reclamation and
pile driving for construction and operation of port facilities
impacts to visual amenity, vegetation and traffic safety due to dust generated during dry periods
through the movement of haul trucks and other heavy vehicles and equipment
impacts to communities, the workforce and local fauna from noise emissions due to vehicular
traffic and mining and port operations, particularly during night operations
impacts to ecosystems and communities from hydrocarbon, nickel ore or other contaminant
spills during mining, haulage and shipping operations, as well as general activities associated
with transport infrastructure
loss of vegetation and fauna habitat from clearing for transport infrastructure
introduction and spread of weeds and plant diseases due to construction of roads and movement
of vehicles and equipment, and
positive impacts to the local transport linkages, including air and sea.
5.3.9.3
Management Objectives
PAGE 91
5.3.9.4
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts for transportation functions, and associated
facilities, staging, monitoring and corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-10.
PAGE 92
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
No complaints about
dust.
Noise emissions
No complaints about
noise.
Air emissions
NA
Dust generation
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
NA
NA
NA
NA
Water as necessary.
Complaints will be
responded to
appropriately.
Complaints will be
responded to
appropriately. Additional
mitigation measures or
procedures may need to be
implemented to reduce
noise impacts.
NA
PAGE 93
Construction
Operation
Infrastructure
Contaminant spills
Stage
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Transport of dangerous
and hazardous materials
in accordance with
Waigani Convention.
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
NA
PAGE 94
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Monitoring
Construction
Management Action
Infrastructure
Criteria
Port
Traffic conflicts
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
NA
PAGE 95
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Loss of vegetation
communities
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Vegetation retained or
rehabilitated wherever
possible.
NA
be reported immediately
and recorded as an
incident. A quarterly
review of traffic incidents
will be carried out and
measures implemented if
needed.
Internal performance of
rehabilitation will be
reviewed quarterly to halfyearly. Rehabilitation areas
will be maintained as
required to promote
establishment of
vegetation, such as
suppression of weeds.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Inspections of cargo to be undertaken in
accordance with quarantine
requirements.
Inspections of ocean going vessels in
the port and their records demonstrating
compliance will be undertaken by port
management.
NA
Quarantine inspections and
actions taken to be
appropriately recorded.
Inspections and actions
taken to be appropriately
recorded.
PAGE 96
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
facility as required.
PAGE 97
5.3.10.1
Choiseul Province had a total population of 26,372 according to the last census taken in 2009; most
of the population is located in small coastal villages.
The people of Choiseul Province are largely of Melanesian and Micronesian descent.
The people of Choiseul Island speak local languages which originate from the Austronesian language
family (Lewis 2009; Hitchcock 2011). Most people are multi-lingual; whilst English is the official
national language, Solomon Islands Pijin is more widely spoken (School et al. 2002).
In 1999, the three main religions in Choiseul Province, in order of largest followings, were the
United Church, the Roman Catholic Church and the Seventh Day Adventist Church (SDA).
5.3.10.1.1
Governance
Tribal or clans: Society on Choiseul is organised into patrilineal descent groups self identified as
tribes and clans (H.W. Scheffler 1965, McFee 1965) [1]. Within SMM Solomons tenement, a
number of tribes and clans have been identified; each tribe and clan is governed by a chief.
Villages and populated places: Male chiefs govern village affairs and land issues in civil society
on Choiseul Island. Traditionally, women do the bulk of the caring of children and a large
proportion of food production work. Men are typically involved in organising cash crops (copra,
cocoa, honey and spices), fish for sale and handle cash and also spend a significant amount of
time participating in village governance (attending to meetings and leadership issues surrounding
families and community affairs).
Public policy and decision making about governance and constitutional reform matters.
Dispute resolution, i.e. dealing with domestic violence, marriage and family life counselling
along and low level disputes such as arguments over land and property.
PAGE 98
5.3.10.1.2
Political Situation
The political history of the Solomon Islands has been tumultuous. Previous governments were
characterised by unstable parliamentary coalitions between the various political parties and
frequently subject to, votes of no confidence and leadership and cabinet changes (US Department of
State 2011). The impacts from the ethnic conflicts during the period of 1999-2001 continue to affect
the country.
5.3.10.1.3
Social Services
Data from 2009 indicates 24 Social Services in operation on Choiseul Island of which four are
located in urban areas and 20 in rural areas (2009 Census).
Health
There are limited health services available on Choiseul Island. People living in or near the Project
Area on Choiseul Island indicated that they must travel long distances to hospitals in Taro, Sasamuga,
Gizo (Western Province) or the National Referral Hospital in Honiara for any major health care
needs. Several local clinics also exist on Choiseul Island, but are limited in their service offering by
lack of medical supplies and limited resourcing and equipment. Wagina Clinic on Wagina Island is
the largest clinic available to local village communities in and around the project area.
Education
According to the Provincial Government of Choiseul, there were a total of 49 primary schools, 6
secondary schools and 1 Rural Training Centre in Choiseul in 2007. The teacher to pupil ratio was
1:24, but most teachers were untrained.
The literacy rate at the time was (5 - 85+years) which is equivalent to 73.3 percent, higher than the
national average of 64.4 percent (Choiseul Province 2007).
Recently released 2009 census data suggests literacy rates in Choiseul Province have grown since
2007 with 95.9% of men and 95.7% of women over 15 years of age reported to be literate
(SIG,2009). These rates are significantly higher than overall Solomon Island literacy rates (88.9% for
men and 79.2 % for women) and also indicated inequity exists for women generally.
Policing
Police headquarters for Choiseul Province is located to the north of the Island in the capital Taro.
Policing of the Project area is provided by up to three officers based at the Wagina Police Station
located on an Island south of the mainland, approximately 20 minutes by boat.
Key policing issues identified in The Choiseul Provincial Government Medium Term Development
Plan 2009 included:
Lack of respect for elders and traditional customs and beliefs by youth.
The Provincial Government is working with the National Government, the LLTC and local health
service providers to address these issues.
PAGE 99
5.3.10.1.4
In rural parts of Choiseul Island, the cash economy is largely sustained through local market trading,
cash crop farming, local businesses (such as canteens, trade stores and petrol depots) and
employment in government and the forestry and mining sectors. Currently the cash economy assists
rural people to supplement their subsistence lifestyles and insulate themselves during periods of
economic hardship and poor crop yield.
Despite the positive benefits to individual households, it is argued by some, that the cash economy
has eroded the social fabric of many communities in the Solomon Islands and damaged the
communal spirit of caring and sharing (Janson, Mullen, Pollard, Maemouri, Watoto and Iramu,
2006). In addition, it has encouraged social problems (due to an increase in alcohol and drug use)
and resulted in decreased agricultural productivity (due to population growth and resulting pressure
on agricultural land). Because the majority of farming is traditionally done by women in rural
communities, these pressures have subsequently increased womens workload.
The distinctive cultural values and practices of Choiseul Province remain today although there is
concern from elders that these values and practices are being eroded due to younger generations
being exposed to and adopting aspects of western culture. Local communities provide security and
support to local households and individuals in need through voluntary community based
contributions. Individual wealth accumulation to improve village quality of life is not viewed as a
priority.
The Choiseul Development Plan 2009 -2011 reports that youth on Choiseul have few opportunities
outside the traditional subsistence system once they leave school (CDP 2009).
5.3.10.1.5
The existing character of the landscape on Choiseul Island in the proximity of the Project
infrastructure primarily comprises of coastal forest, lowland communities and upslope rainforest.
Almost all of the upslope rainforest is old growth. The rainforest is typically dominated by canopy
species approximately 30-40 m in height; understory is dense and comprises of mainly young trees
and other saplings, as well as small palms and ferns. Previous logging operations have left logging
tracks and other cleared areas which have been eroded over time.
The ports and associated infrastructure will mainly be located within coastal forest, where some of
this area has already disturbed land, notably at both Port C1.1 and Port C1.2. The mining areas and
most of the proposed haul, facility access and service road length will be constructed in natural
vegetation.
Communities located in the general vicinity of the Choiseul Tenement, including those located near
the port sites, are situated on or near the coastline and are typically surrounded by tall vegetation,
garden areas and/or hills. Project infrastructure and mining areas will therefore be generally less
visible in the immediate vicinity of a village and more visible across embayments (particularly in
respect of port infrastructure) or where Project components are located in elevated areas of the
landscape.
5.3.10.1.6
Land tenure within SMM Solomons tenement is defined in terms of tribal or clan kinship and it
includes tribal and clan boundaries, customary management of land and seas and the regulation and
maintenance of these boundaries.
PAGE 100
The introduction of logging and monetary compensation for the use of land and resources has
required tribes and clans to define their boundaries in terms of Western mapping and geospatial data,
and this need for clearly demarcated boundaries has precipitated inter-tribal and clan conflict. In
Choiseul Island, the tribes and clans have had to define a process to determine the exact location of
their boundaries for a variety of reasons including compensation for logging. This process is currently
underway in SMM Solomons tenement.
Customary land use in Choiseul Island has always included subsistence horticulture, hunting,
gathering, fishing, travel and land use for religious purposes (Jansen and Sirikolo 2010; Kwa'ioloa
and Burt 1997; McDonald 2009; H. W. Scheffler 1965). These uses remain unchanged within SMM
Solomons tenement; however they have been adapted to the changes and technologies introduced
by missionisation, colonialism, logging, and prospecting.
There are several roads within SMM Solomons tenement that have been abandoned by logging
companies and which are currently being used by villagers for easier access to the interior of the
tenement and a better selection of garden areas.
The majority of the crops used by villagers were introduced some 4,000 years ago from South East
Asia (Grant and Miller 2004). More recent introduced crops such as rice, tobacco and coffee are also
cultivated in some areas in Choiseul Island in a small scale (Grant and Miller 2004); however within
SMM Solomons tenement, coffee and tobacco gardens are rare and there is no cultivation of rice.
Small trade stores are the most frequent source of these commodities.
Plantations, gardens and fishing and hunting areas are selected following customary selection
criteria, however village sites are selected using Western criteria such as convenience of access. In
some areas, old logging camps are being used as readymade villages.
5.3.10.1.7
Socio-Economic
The local economy in the Project area is characterised largely by subsistence activities including
farming (gardening and coconut gardens), small-scale animal husbandry, fishing and logging.
Within Choiseul Province there are 591 small village based enterprises, of which approximately
63 % are small trade stores.
There are low levels of employment in Choiseul; cash generating employment is by logging
companies and SMM Solomon exploration.
Additional income earning activities are; copra production, saw milling and timber sales, marine
resource harvesting, and market gardening.
A Land Resources Study revealed that Choiseul Province has limited agricultural opportunity areas
with only 153 km2 of land suitable for agricultural development. Livestock husbandry is on a
domestic scale.
Forestry is a major industry in Choiseul; it is an important source of jobs, tax and duty revenues to
both national and provincial governments. Unsustainable commercial logging occurs in Choiseul.
Fishing for direct consumption is an important subsistence activity in Choiseul province, with more
than 80 % of households participating in this activity. Households also frequently engage in the
harvesting of shellfish, crab/lobster, and turtles for direct consumption.
Tourism is in its infancy in Choiseul Province despite the pristine natural environment which
presents opportunities for eco-tourism development.
Various organisations are established and operating in Choiseul province to enhance economic
development.
PAGE 101
5.3.10.1.8
Health
Reports prepared by UNICEF and the Solomon Islands Ministry of Health and Medical Services,
show a high prevalence of infectious diseases, respiratory diseases and an increasing incidence of
non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease. Research shows skin diseases
and ear infections in Choiseul had higher occurrences than the national average in 2009. During
community consultation conducted on Choiseul in November 2011 diarrhoea was reported by five
out of eight villages as a major health issue. This may be attributed to water sources and usage, and
lack of sanitation facilities.
On Choiseul health infrastructure consists of a 75-bed Provincial Hospital, two Area Health Centres,
10 clinics,12 nurse aide posts and one mini-hospital. There is only one doctor allocated to the
26,000 people on the island. Registered nurses are shared according to the needs of the area and for
effective coverage.
Information and data on health issues, incidences of diseases, sanitation and health facilities for the
17 Project affected villages was collected during the community consultation phase of the Social
Impact Assessment. Malaria, respiratory illnesses (specifically pneumonia) and diarrhoea were
reported as the main health issues affecting the villages. Cardiovascular diseases such as
hypertension and diabetes are identified major non-communicable diseases.
The primary sources of water in the villages are rivers or streams with rainwater stored as alternate
source for domestic purposes. The importance of safe and clean drinking water is emphasised as it is
inextricably linked with the control and management of water-borne diseases such as diarrhoea.
The lack of sanitary toilet facilities within villages pose significant health risks.
A lack of health facilities and difficulty accessing them were reported as major issues for the 17
projected affected villages. Villagers consult traditional health practitioners and use traditional health
treatments (i.e. bark of trees) for diarrhoea, fever and other diseases.
5.3.10.1.9
The entry of approximately 500 workers from overseas and the expected influx of other support and
service personnel could result in a population in excess of 5,000 people in the Wards of Kirugela
and Katupika where the tenement is located.
Incoming workers must be successfully integrated with local employees and residents to minimise
any impacts on the lifestyles, culture and traditions of the island.
The workforce must be housed and managed in order to minimise any impacts on land, food
security, health and island infrastructure.
There is potential for disruption to island life should tension and conflict erupt hence worker
behaviour must be managed.
The project brings opportunities to expand on skills, knowledge and experience which will build
future capacity on Choiseul Island. Employment opportunities should improve the lifestyles of the
local people as they continue their transition to a cash economy.
5.3.10.2
Potential Impacts
social inequality
PAGE 102
increased population leading to increased demand for social services and infrastructure
loss of existing access routes to and from villages and garden areas at port site
delayed or restricted access to local fishing grounds in harbour and port area exclusion zone
adverse visual changes to landscape, skyline and sea views at Memese, Siruka Bay, and
Ologholata Harbour (in particular), as well as viewed from the marine area adjacent to Project
components
impacts to customary land ownership resulting from the legal determination of tribe and clan
boundaries, the influx of new residents and the increased demand for land
impacts to subsistence horticulture resulting from the loss of existing and potential garden areas,
the introduction of new crops and the increased demand for crops
impacts to hunting, fishing and shellfish gathering resulting from population influx, the loss of
access, the loss of habitat and decrease in availabilities
a potential reduction in suitable sites for new villages within the tenement
PAGE 103
accidents and injuries and exposure of workers to hazardous substances and wastes
traffic conflicts
5.3.10.3
Management Objectives
To minimise the impacts on social services, infrastructure and social or cultural values due to the
increase in population.
To prevent and manage any incidences of increased anti-social behaviour attributable to the
Project.
To communicate and address any loss of existing access routes to villages, gardens and marine
areas.
To minimise negative visual amenity changes resulting from the Project from viewpoints on land
and water.
To minimise any adverse potential impacts on the land use and tenure social values.
To minimise any potential adverse health impacts that may result from the Project by proactively
conducting health monitoring and implementing preventative measures.
The opportunities for local people to be trained and employed by the Project are optimised.
PAGE 104
5.3.10.4
Management Strategies
Proposed actions for managing potential impacts to social values, and associated monitoring and
corrective actions, are provided in Table 5-11.
PAGE 105
Infrastructure
Construction
Criteria
Management Action
Local Villagers
continue the activities
that characterise their
daily lives.
Social inequality
(particularly aged,
disabled, single parent
families and minority
ethnic groups)
Report on community/
stakeholder consultation
activities, topics raised,
outcomes and follow up
actions.
Vulnerable groups do
not expand in
membership.
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Monitoring
Operation
Port
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Periodically review
membership of Stakeholder
Reference Group to ensure
effective representation.
Review Community/
Stakeholder Consultation Plan
annually, revise and update.
NA
PAGE 106
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Controlled influx of
informal settlers.
No increased demand
for social services and
infrastructure resulting
from the Project.
PAGE 107
Monitoring
No outbreaks or
increases of
illnesses/disease
attributable to the
Project.
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Management Action
Infrastructure
Criteria
Port
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
PAGE 108
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Increased anti-social
behaviours
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
No anti-social
behaviours attributable
to the Project.
health promotion
disease prevention
infectious disease control, and
STD/HIV-AIDS prevention programs.
Work with local structures, including relevant
stakeholders, law enforcement agencies, churches,
leaders and NGOs to develop strategies to
minimise anti-social behaviours, adverse health
and safety impacts and law and order issues.
statistics.
Address any trends or
anomalies.
Report on community/
stakeholder consultation
activities, topics raised,
outcomes and follow up
actions.
PAGE 109
Criteria
Management Action
Delayed or restricted
access to and from
villages near port areas
Monitoring
community consultation
strategy.
Internally audit workplace
practices for cultural
appropriateness annually.
Report on number of
employees attending cross
cultural awareness training.
Review program annually.
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Report on community/
stakeholder consultation
activities, topics raised,
outcomes and follow up
actions.
PAGE 110
Report on community/
stakeholder consultation
activities, topics raised,
outcomes and follow up
actions.
Report on community/
stakeholder consultation
activities, topics raised,
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Report on number of
complaints received and
corrective actions.
Internally audit construction,
rehabilitation, architectural and
landscaping plans against
legislation and standards
regarding visual amenity.
Report on non-conformances
and corrective actions taken.
PAGE 111
Report on non-compliance.
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Dust generation
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Impacts to customary
land ownership
Criteria
No dust complaints
during construction
and operations.
Management Action
Monitoring
NA
Record point of origin for all employees
and maintain in personnel records.
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
NA
Monitor effectiveness of Surface Access
Agreement.
PAGE 112
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
is low.
Impacts to subsistence
horticulture
Loss of gardens
established by ancestors
Impacts to hunting,
fishing and shellfish
gathering resulting from
population influx, the
loss of access, the loss of
habitat and decrease in
Minimise loss of
gardens.
Report on community/
stakeholder consultation
strategy.
Identify areas for improvement.
Review and update procedures
accordingly.
NA
NA
NA
Report on community/
stakeholder consultation
strategy.
Identify areas for improvement.
Review and update procedures
accordingly. Review topics
PAGE 113
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
availabilities.
Workplace related
accidents and injuries
and exposure of workers
to solid, liquid and
hazardous wastes
raised in community/
stakeholder consultation and
ensure they have been
appropriately actioned.
Report on security breaches.
NA
NA
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Eliminate
contamination of water
PAGE 114
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Minimise exposure to
dust and noise.
Management Plan.
NA
PAGE 115
Port
Infrastructure
Construction
Operation
Stage
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
PAGE 116
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
Increase in the
purchase of processed
food.
PAGE 117
Criteria
Management Action
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
participants.
Threat to traditional
values and culture
Movement of workers
is restricted.
Gender inequality
Women being
employed and trained.
PAGE 118
Criteria
Management Action
women.
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
against targets.
Transportation
Current carrying
capacity on air and sea
carriers is maintained.
PAGE 119
Criteria
Management Action
industries. Conditions
of employment are
comparable to that of
other industries.
Monitoring
Auditing, Reporting,
Corrective Action
Operation
Construction
Stage
Infrastructure
Port
Haulage
Facility
Mine
Potential Impact
process.
annually.
PAGE 120
Appendix A
Weekly Environmental Inspection Template
Yes/No/NA
Appendix B
Incident Response Form Template
Appendix C
Complaint Response Form Template
Name of recorder
Date recorded
Appendix D
Cultural Heritage Management Plan
Identify known cultural heritage sites belonging to all tribes and clans within SMM Solomons
tenement
Avoid, where possible, all known cultural heritage sites (both tangible and intangible)
Where avoidance is not possible, to manage cultural heritage sites in consultation with the tribal
or clan landowners.
Legislation
National legislation pertaining to the preservation of cultural heritage in the Solomon Islands is not in
existence, however there is a Provincial Ordinance in existence in Choiseul Province which outlines
a process which must be abided by in relation to development in the province and cultural heritage.
Choiseul Province Ordinance, Part IV 13(1) dictates that the register of protected places must be
consulted and that all places of historical, cultural or archaeological significance be surveyed prior to
development activity. The Provincial Ordinance also dictates that cultural heritage surveys be carried
out by persons of suitable professional qualifications.
The Environment Act 1998 is brief in its requirements concerning cultural heritage where an EIS is
being carried out. The sole requirement states that a survey must be carried out concerning National
Heritage items or traditional artefacts in Section 23 of the Act.
SMM Solomon as a signatory of the ICMM subscribes to the responsible extraction and production of
minerals and metals and recognises that mining activities will affect the land, territories, resources
and way of life of indigenous peoples. ICMM members recognise the right of Solomon Islanders to
maintain their culture including their cultural heritage whether tangible or intangible. ICMM and its
members subscribe to the UN Guidelines on the Protection of the Cultural Heritage of Indigenous
Peoples, which focuses on ensuring the protection of indigenous knowledge, intangible heritage,
tangible heritage and the promotion of their cultural expressions that are generally collectively
maintained and inter-generational in nature.
All international guidelines subscribed to by ICMM have been taken into account when developing
the CHMP.
Cultural Heritage Surveys
Cultural heritage surveys will be undertaken of all known cultural heritage sites within the tenement
prior to the commencement of the construction phase 8.
The cultural heritage surveys will be conducted subsequent to community consultation and the
authorisation of all tribes and clans asserting ownership of the area to be surveyed.
Where a land dispute exists, community consultation and authorisation must be sought from all
parties to the dispute. Where one party withholds authorisation, the cultural heritage survey will not
be carried out.
Attendance to cultural heritage surveys by members of the landowning tribe or clan must be
compensated in accordance with the inclusions to the surface access right or the mining agreement.
8
Some cultural heritage surveys have already been carried out as part of the Environmental Impact Statement process. These surveys do
not need to be repeated.
Cultural heritage surveys will be carried out by the following qualified personnel:
A liaison officer who is a person of Solomon Islander descent but not belonging to the island on
which the tenement is located
Any number of persons elected by the tribe or clan or the Chief of said tribe or clan who are
knowledgeable in relation to the area and to the cultural heritage sites to be surveyed.
Appropriately recorded (including detailed site description, photographs, size and typology)
cultural heritage sites and necessary buffer zones
Buffer zones of 50m (radius from the GPS point) established around each identified cultural
heritage site within SMM Solomons tenement.
Agreement for the cultural heritage management approach by the tribe or clan of the area where
the cultural heritage survey is carried out.
An updated version of the cultural heritage section of the EIS which is confidential and not stored
where it may be discovered, sighted or copied by any person.
Buffer Zones
Each of the cultural heritage sites identified as highly significant in the site significance matrix will
have a permanent 50m buffer zone (radius from the GPS point) around it. The buffer zone will:
Be disclosed to the following SMM Solomon workers who will be bound by a confidentiality
agreement:
Exploration manager
Site manager
Be developed by the cultural heritage specialists and the landowning tribe or clan
Contain a detailed record of the significance of each site taking into account:
Be the basis for a site specific cultural heritage plan should the cultural heritage site need to be
disturbed.
Where avoidance is not practicable, outline a process of negotiation and compensation for the
landowning tribes.
Be well versed in all legislation and requirements pertaining to cultural heritage within SMM
Solomons tenement.
Visit each tribal and clan Chief regularly with the object of providing Project updates where
cultural heritage is concerned and to obtain feedback regarding cultural heritage related issues
Collaborate on cultural development initiatives such as funding for museums, art galleries, crafts,
cultural research and partnerships with the Solomon Islands Museum.
Monitor(s)
SMM Solomon will ensure that a monitor is present during all earth disturbing activities. The monitor
will:
Be selected by the tribe or clan on whose land the earth disturbance is occurring. Where a land
dispute is in progress, a monitor from each tribe or clan claiming the area will be present.
It is highly recommended that the liaison officer not belong to any of the tribes or clans within SMM Solomons tenement as
this may be the cause of problems because of conflicts of interest and confidentiality.
SMM Solomon will ensure that all SMM Solomon personnel responsible for the execution of
tasks and requirements in the CHMP are competent on the basis of education, training and
experience.
SMM Solomons training activity associated with the CHMP will be appropriately documented
by means of a training needs assessment, training plan and records of training undertaken.
SMM Solomon will provide training in all legislation and requirements pertaining to cultural
heritage within SMM Solomons tenement.
Monitor(s)
SMM Solomon will provide training in the identification of cultural heritage materials.
Be conducted with every SMM Solomon employee and consultant prior to the commencement
of any type of work on-site
Include protocols for visiting villages and surrounding lands and forests which may have
significant cultural heritage values
Instruct in the protocols of hunting, fishing and gathering within tribal and clan lands.
Provide an overview of Melanesian culture with a focus on the tribes and clans within SMM
Solomons tenement.
Members of the tribes and clans within SMM Solomons tenement should be encouraged to
participate in the cross cultural activities as instructors.
Inclusions to the Surface Access Right or Mining Agreement
Inclusions to the surface access right or the mining agreement will be developed by a legal
professional with the assistance of SMM Solomon liaison officer and a suitably qualified cultural
heritage specialist.
Key Performance Indicators
Table 5-12 outlines the indicators for measuring and verifying performance in relation to the CHMP.
Performance Indicator
Measurement
Internal
Auditing
Frequency
Number of incidents
Quarterly
Relative
Management
Plan
Objective
1,2
Number of sites
appropriately
managed
Quarterly
1,2
Further performance indicators to be developed and agreed between the tribes and clans, the
community liaison officer and SMM Solomon.
Reporting and Notification
Site clearance, provided by the landowning tribe or clan, will be required for each cultural heritage
site identified during the EIS phase. The cultural heritage team will determine the nature and
significance of each site identified during the EIS phase and record it in the site significance matrix.
All documentation will be supplied to SMM Solomon through an annual summary report and a final
report will be prepared once all earth disturbing activities are finalised.
Reporting of Contractor Cultural Heritage Surveys
Contractors will report to SMM Solomon all the results of each cultural heritage survey and integrate
all the results into the EIS including:
Recording and mapping of cultural heritage sites (both tangible and intangible).
Desktop research.
Halt all operations at the location where the chance find was identified.
Engage a suitably qualified archaeologist to assess the chance find and determine a management
strategy.
Be carried out according to provincial and national legislation and international standards
Confidentiality
In accordance with the outcomes of the community consultation carried out during the EIS phase, all
information collected in relation to cultural heritage sites will:
Be kept confidential