COURSE NUMBER __ENG 1101_____

SEMESTER ______FALL___

CRN __12179________
The work ethics that are monitored are as follows: attendance, character,
teamwork, appearance, attitude, productivity, organizational skills,
communication, cooperation, and respect. Work ethics will be evaluated by
the following method. Remember, to meet expectations is a good thing. In
the workforce as well as in college most people fall in the category of 2meets expectations. Attached is the TCSG evaluation form that will be used.
NUMERICAL GRADE
3 (24-30)
2 (20-23)
1 (17-19)
0 (0-16)

DESCRIPTION
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unacceptable

I have attended the first day of class where I received a course syllabus
which explains the specific course requirements and policies.
I will abide by all rules and regulations set forth as a policy by Columbus
Technical College. I will practice behavior that is responsible, ethical, and
legal.
There is a procedure for appeal in place for the work ethics program. It is as
follows:
1. If the student does not feel that the evaluation he or she received is
justified, the student should put the appeal in writing to the instructor.
2. If the student is not satisfied with the results received from the
instructor, he or she may appeal to the Program Manager.
3. If the student is not satisfied with the results from the Program
Manager, he or she may appeal to the Dean.
4. If extenuating circumstances warrant further investigation, a final
written appeal should be submitted to the Work Ethics Coordination
Monitors.
5. NOTE: All appeals must be in writing.
PRINT NAME SOLANGE GORDON
SIGNATURE _________________________________

WORK ETHICS EVALUATION FORM

COURSE TITLE

ENG 1101

CRN

162-13-4953

QUARTER

12179

INSTRUCTOR

Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Unacceptable

Work Ethics Trait

3

Point Score
2
1

ExpectationsExceeds

24-30
20-23
17-19
0-16

Mr. STRAVELAKIS
End-of-Quarter

Unacceptable

ImprovementNeeds

3
2
1
0

Meets Expectations

Grading Scale

ExpectationsExceeds

Mid-Quarter

FALL

Point Score
2
1

Unacceptable

SS#

ImprovementNeeds

SOLANGE GORDON

Meets Expectations

STUDENT NAME

Attendance: Attends class; arrives/leaves on time; notifies

instructor in advance of planned absences.
Character: Displays loyalty, honesty, trustworthiness,
dependability, reliability, initiative, self-discipline, and selfresponsibility.
Teamwork: Respects the rights of others; respects confidentiality;
is a team worker; is cooperative; is assertive; displays a customer
service attitude; seeks opportunities for continuous learning;
demonstrates mannerly behavior.
Appearance: Displays appropriate dress, grooming, hygiene, and
etiquette.
Attitude: Demonstrates a positive attitude; appears self-confident;
has realistic expectations of self.
Productivity: Follows safety practices; conserves materials; keeps
work area neat and clean; follows directions and procedures; makes
up assignments punctually; participates.
Organizational Skills: Manifests skill in prioritizing and
management of time and stress; demonstrates flexibility in handling
change.
Communication: Displays appropriate nonverbal (eye contact,
body language) and oral (listening, telephone etiquette, grammar)
skills.
Cooperation: Displays leadership skills; appropriately handles
criticism, conflicts, and complaints; demonstrates problem-solving
capability; maintains appropriate relationships with supervisors and
peers; follows chain of command.
Respect: Deals appropriately with cultural/racial diversity; does not
engage in harassment of any kind.

SUBTOTAL

TOTAL SCORE
STUDENT'S GRADE

20
MID-QUARTER GRADE:
2 (Meets Expectations)

0
20

FINAL GRADE:
2 (Meets Expectations)

Explanation of Work Ethics Grades

Exceeds Expectations:
Meets Expectations:
Needs Improvement:
Unacceptable:

Work ethics performance is exemplary. Student has consistently demonstrated characteristics that will stand out in the work environment.
All work ethics standards are met. The quality of student's work ethics performance is that of a good employee in the normal work
environment.
Some standards were not met. Additional training in employability skills is recommended.

Work ethics performance was below average. Additional training in employability skills is a must if the student is to survive in the
work environment.

Students Signature:

Date:

11/17/2015

WORK ETHICS EVALUATION

Exception Form
Name:

Course:

Date:

POINTS ADDED OR DELETED PER WORK ETHICS TRAIT:

Exceeds Expectations (+1)
Needs Improvement (-1)

Unacceptable (-2)

Attendance

Character

Teamwork

Appearance

Attitude

Productivity

Organizational
Skills

Communication

Cooperation

Respect

PROBLEM OR COMMENDATION:

STUDENT RESPONSE:

IMPROVEMENT PLAN:

Date for Review Session:

(Review may be scheduled for mid-quarter, or at any other designated time.)
/
Instructor

Student

OUTCOME OF REVIEW SESSION:

Points to be added or deleted, if any, from the Work Ethics Evaluation Form:
Exceeds Expectations (+1)
Needs Improvement (-1)
Unacceptable (-2)

Attendance

Character

Teamwork

Appearance

Attitude

Productivity

Organizational
Skills

Communication

Cooperation

Respect

Instructor

Students Signature:
Date:

Date

Student

Date