Michael Foucaults Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the
Prison (1977) is one of the most influential books in modern penology. Taking as his backcloth the great transformation from capital punishment to the timetabled regimes of the penitentiaries and the technologies of power deployed within them, Foucault rejected the liberal argument that the prison was a form of humanitarian progress, claiming instead that prisons developed not to punish less; [but] to punish better, to insert the power to punish more deeply into the social body (p. 82). Although he did not reject the top-down Marxist approach of penologists such as Rusche and Kirchheimer, Foucault used a different analytical framework in order to understand how power operates bot- tom up as a property of systems. He was interested in how disciplinary power impacted on the human soul (the psyche) at the micro level.
For Foucault, power is productive, dispersed throughout society and intimately rela
Pentru Foucault, puterea este productive, dispersata in intreaga societate si legata
Taking Benthams panopticon design and inspection principle
as his cue, Foucault argued that the wider application of such technologies of power had created a modern carceral society of disciplinary control. Hunt and Wickham (1994) explain how, for Foucault, disciplinary power operates on three levels:
1 2 3
Hierarchical observation Differentiated positions of power
that are rooted in surveillance, categorisation and classification. Normalising judgements norms and expected behaviour.
Dominant definitions, rules,
Micro penalties and rewards Means of regulation to ensure
conformity and obedience.
04_Scott and Flynn_A2A0108_Ch-
21-Mar-14
Preluand proiectul panopticon al lui Bentam si principiul inspectiei ca
directive,Foucault a sustinut ca raspandirea extinsa a acestor tehnologii ale puterii a creat societatea carcerala moderna a controlului disciplinar. Hunt si Wickam explica cum, pentru Foucault, puterea opereaza pet rei nivele: 1.observarea ierarhica- diferitele pozitii ale puterii sunt fixate in supraveghere, clasificare si categorizare 2.normalizarea judecatilor definitii dominante, reguli, norme si comportament asteptat 3. micro pedepse si recompense mijloace de regularizare folosite pentru asigurarea conformitatii si ascultarii. The prison was not the only means through which disciplinary power operatedother places included the family, the school, the barracks, the workplace and the hospitalbut it was at the pinnacle of a carceral continuum. Inchisoarea nu a fost singurul mijloc prin care puterea disciplinara a operat, alte locuri fiind familia, scoala, cazarmile, fabricile si spitalele, dar inchisoarea a fost apogeul continuumului carceral.
It is not important that imprisonment is a failure in terms of recidivism. To justify w
Nu este important ca detentia este un esec in cee ace priveste
recidivismul. Pentru a justifica controlul disciplinar extins, Foucault sustine ca inchisorile inventeaza in mod deliberat delincventi. In acest sens, o stare de permanent conflict exista pentru a motiva nevoia pentru o industrie de control a criminalitatii si pentru a legitima controlul disciplinar mai extins. Anumite ilegalitati sunt izolate si mai usor de administrat, in timp ce infractorii sunt recalificati si transformati in indivizi disciplinary, docile si productivi. Foucault has been criticised for overgeneralising disciplinary punish- ments used against juveniles to those used against adults and for provid- ing only a partial analysis of punishments that requires synthesis with one or more of the earlier modernist total theories. His theory that punishment operates through norms and techniques of rationality negates
04_Scott and Flynn_A2A0108_Ch-
21-Mar-14
any consideration of wider cultural meanings, judgements and
understandings punishment has for people. He has also been criticised on the bases that, like the Marxists, his analysis is functionalist and masculinist, and his conception of power simply a restatement of the basic sociological concept of socialisation.