Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TRAFFIC CRASH
INVESTIGATION/RECONSTRUCTION
Presented for:
Presented by:
John Daily
Jackson Hole Scientific Investigations, Inc.
Institute of Police Technology and Mangement
INTRODUCTION
Many crash investigators/reconstruction do not
use, or shy away from using energy methods in
their analyses.
Why?? Various reasons
We will discuss the value and necessity of using
energy methods in our crash investigations.
We will explore various ideas and concepts in
using energy methods in traffic crash
investigations.
WHAT IS ENERGY?
FORMS OF ENERGY
Heat
Light
Sound
Electrical
Chemical
Nuclear
Mechanical
Kinetic
Potential
As crash investigators,
we are most interested in
Kinetic Energy.
ENERGY
1 2
Ke = mv
2
WORK
Work is defined the dot product of a force acting
through a displacement.
In equation form:
W = F d
If a force is applied to an object but there is no
displacement, there is no work.
Notice the vector format for force and
displacement and the scalar format for work (the
dot product of two vectors).
WORK
W = F d ds
s
WORK (CONT.)
W = Fd
F
d
Copyright 2010 - 2012 by N. Shigemura & J. Daily
WORK (CONT.)
W = (F cos ) d
F cos
d
10
W = Ke
1 2 1 2
= mv f mvi
2
2
1
= m v 2f vi2
2
)
11
12
ENERGY
Braking
Engine
Service brakes
Collisions
13
Skidding
W = Fd
= mgfd
F
f =
mg
fmg = F
F = fmg
Where: W = work
F = resistive force due to friction, N
f = drag factor
m = mass of the vehicle, kg
d = distance of the skid, m
g= gravitational acceleration, 9.81 M/sec2
Copyright 2010 - 2012 by N. Shigemura & J. Daily
14
Collision
Breaking/damaging
objects
Attenuators
Poles
Guard
Damage
rails, etc.
energy
To
15
Slide to a stop
Work = fwd
eta =
0.80
10.28
16.21
21.58
S=
39.16
f_overall =
0.50
f_ref =
0.70
eta =
0.71
Interval
d (ft)
1
2
3
20.20
19.41
24.54
i+1
0
27
56.5
avg
27
56.5
87
13.5
41.75
71.75
fr
0.70
0.70
0.70
sin
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.233
0.666
0.950
fadj
-0.035
-0.035
-0.035
S (mph)
0.174
0.451
0.633
18.30
87
109
98
0.70
0.06
0.990
-0.035
0.659
19.02
19.72
102.17
109
134
121.5
0.70
0.06
0.853
-0.035
0.571
18.37
mph
KE =
I 2
16
Crash attenuators
Skid
Example 1
Copyright 2010 - 2012 by N. Shigemura & J. Daily
17
18
Skid to impact.
Crushing/destroying crash attenuators.
Post impact movement to final position.
Damage (crush) sustained by the vehicle.
19
Example 1
Copyright 2010 - 2012 by N. Shigemura & J. Daily
4
20
w = mgfd
= 13,377(0.70)15.24
= 142,706 J
2. 52,240 J
(e.g. from specs)
52,240 J
d 15.24 m
f = 0.70
3
3. w = mgfd
= 13,377(0.40)25
= 133,770 J
d = 25 m
f = 0.40
4. 284,760 J
4
284,760 J
21
22
26 Ke
m
26(613,476 )
1364
15,950376
1364
= 11,693.8
= 108km / h
Copyright 2010 - 2012 by N. Shigemura & J. Daily
23
Example 2 Consider an
impact with a wooden pole
where the pole breaks.
The impact event can have
four energy losses
1.
2.
3.
4.
24
ANALOGY
25
ANALOGY (CONT.)
26
S = 254df
27
The basic
Kinetic Energy = Work
speed
1
mv = Fd
equation
2
comes from
1
mv = (mgf )d
2
the workv
= fd
energy
2g
theorem.
v = 2 gfd
v = 2 gfd
v = 2 gfd
Velocity in fundamental units
v = 2(9.81) fd
v = 19.62 fd
v=
S
3 .6
S
= 19.62 fd
3 .6
S = 3.6 19.62 fd
S = 3.6 2 (19.62) fd
S = 254 fd
28
S=
or
S = 254( f1d1 + f 2 d 2 + f 3 d 3 + K + f n d n ) + S 2f
The speeds in these equations are Kinetic Energy Equivalent (KEES)
speeds because each represents a discreet kinetic energy change.
29
30
S12 + S 22 + S32 + K + S n2
31
Thus:
Speed
S = S12 + S 22 + S33 + K + S n2
32
33
34
Calculating delta-Vs
2 1 Ecrush
v1 =
1m1
m1 1 +
2 m2
m1
v2 =
v1
m2
Where: Ecrush = E1 + E2 (damage energy of Unit 1 plus the damage energy of Unit 2), J
m1 = mass of Unit 1, kg
m2 = mass of Unit 2, kg
= effective mass ratio
35
SOME DEFINITIONS
36
SOME DEFINITIONS
A
G =
2B
37
SOME DEFINITIONS
k2
= 2 2
k +h
k = radius of gyration
h = lever arm from collision (impulse) force line to CM
38
SOME DEFINITIONS
E = (1 + tan ) ( A + Bx)dxdL
2
39
A2
2
E = A + B x AD +
1 + tan
2B
Where: E
A, B
AD
x
(1+tan2)
40
4.
Stiffness coefficients
Area of damage
Depth of the damage centroid from the damage
face
The angle the collision force makes with respect
to a line normal (perpendicular) to the damage
face.
41
DAMAGE ENERGY
42
http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/database/veh/veh.htm
43
44
45
46
47
48
By
49
(1+ tan )
50
CONCLUSION
Understanding energy concepts and energy
analysis techniques puts more tools in the
crash investigator/reconstructionists tool box.
By looking at the movements of vehicles from
an energy point of view helps clarify many
issues and questions.
Utilizing energy analysis techniques can assist
the investigator in solving crashes that may
have previously gone unsolved.
51