Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
885
Aircraft Systems
Engineering
Cost Analysis
Karen Willcox
MIT
Laboratory
AEROSPACE COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN LABORATORY
Outline
Lifecycle cost
Operating cost
Development cost
Manufacturing cost
Revenue
Valuation techniques
9/19/2004
16.885
Lifecycle Cost
Lifecycle :
Design - Manufacture - Operation - Disposal
Lifecycle cost :
Total cost of program over lifecycle
85% of Total LCC is locked in by the end of
preliminary design.
9/19/2004
16.885
40
20
0
65%
9/19/2004
16.885
Disposal
Operation
and support
Manufacturing
and acquisition
80
Detailed design
100
Preliminary design,
system integration
Conceptual
design
Lifecycle Cost
95%
85%
Time
(From Roskam, Figure 2.3)
Operating Cost
9/19/2004
16.885
SROC
10%
CROC
2%
PROC
18%
AROC
70%
Capital
Costs
CAROC
40%
60%
Fuel
Maintenance
Landing
Ground Handling
GPE Depreciation
GPE Maintenance
Control & Communications
16.885
Other
3%
9%
7%
Landing
Crew
40%
6%
Maintenance
15%
Fuel
20%
16.885
9/19/2004
16.885
Tooling
Other
Engineering
- airframe design/analysis
- configuration control
- systems engineering
Tooling
- design of tools and fixtures
- fabrication of tools and fixtures
Other
- development support
- flight testing
Engineering
Non-Recurring Cost
9/19/2004
16.885
Material
Support
Labor
- fabrication
- assembly
- integration
Material to manufacture
- raw material
- purchased outside production
- purchased equipment
Production support
- QA
- production tooling support
- engineering support
Labor
Recurring Cost
Learning Curve
Yx
Y0 x
16.885
Learning Curve
Cost of unit
0.8
0.6
0.4
b=0.9
0.55
0.2
Every time
production
doubles, cost
is reduced
by a factor
of 0.9
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Unit number
16.885
Number of planes
Engineering Data
& Performance
Build Schedule
120
80
40
0
2000
2010
2020
Recurring
Cost
2030
Year
Component Breakdown
Plane
Wing
COST
MODEL
Fuselage
Learning Curve
NRC Distribution
2
NRC ($B)
Cost of unit
1
0.8
0.4
0
Non-Recurring
Cost
10
20
30
Unit number
40
50
0
2003
9/19/2004
2007
2011
Year
16.885
2015
16.885
Cost Modeling
Learning effects
Commonality effects
16.885
Cost Modeling
Plane
Landing
Gear
Centerbody Wing
Winglet
Inner
Wing
Outer
Wing
Identifier
Weight
Material &
Equipment
16.885
Payloads Final
Assembly
Area RC per
pound
Labor
9/19/2004
Propulsion Systems
Subparts
per pound
Support
NRC per
pound
Tooling
NRC time
distribution
Engineering
Other
Baseline QA
Baseline Dev. Labs
Baseline
QA QA
Baseline
Baseline
Dev.Dev.
Labs
Baseline
Labs
Baseline
ToolTool
Fab.
Baseline
Fab
Baseline
ToolTool
Design
Baseline
Design
Baseline
M.E.M.E.
Baseline
.
Baseline
Engr.
Baseline
Engr.
Baseline M.E.
Baseline Engr.
non-dimensional time
16.885
c(t ) Kt D 1 (1 t ) E 1
Typical development time ~6 years
Learning effects captured span, cost
0.06
Support
0.05
normalized cost
Tool Fab
0.04
Tool Design
ME
0.02
(from Markish)
Engineering
0.01
normalized time
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
9/19/2004
16.885
Payloads
8%
Wing
20%
Systems
17%
Empennage
9%
Installed Engines
8%
Landing Gear
1%
Fuselage
37%
16.885
ME
Tool
Design
Tool Fab
Support
Totals
40.0%
10.0%
10.5%
34.8%
4.7%
100.0%
Wing
$7,093
$1,773
$1,862
$6,171
$833
$17,731
Empennage
$20,862
$5,216
$5,476
$18,150
$2,451
$52,156
Fuselage
$12,837
$3,209
$3,370
$11,169
$1,508
$32,093
$999
$250
$262
$869
$117
$2,499
Installed Engines
$3,477
$869
$913
$3,025
$408
$8,691
Systems
$13,723
$3,431
$3,602
$11,939
$1,612
$34,307
Payloads
$4,305
$1,076
$1,130
$3,746
$506
$10,763
Landing Gear
9/19/2004
16.885
Labor
Materials
Support
85%
95%
95%
time
9/19/2004
16.885
Final Assembly
6%
Wing
27%
Payloads
11%
Systems
6%
Installed Engines
9%
Empennage
10%
Landing Gear
3%
Fuselage
28%
16.885
Materials
Other
Total
$609
$204
$88
$900
$1,614
$484
$233
$2,331
Fuselage
$679
$190
$98
$967
Landing Gear
$107
$98
$16
$221
Installed Engines
$248
$91
$36
$374
Systems
$315
$91
$46
$452
Payloads
$405
$100
$59
$564
Final Assembly
$58
$4
$3
$65
Wing
Empennage
9/19/2004
16.885
9/19/2004
16.885
Revenue Model
90
160
80
price ($M)
120
100
80
60
40
60
50
40
30
20
10
20
0
1985
A300
A310
A330
A340
747
767
777
MD-11
70
deliveries
767-200ER
767-300ER
777-200
777-300
747-400
MD-11
A300
A330
A340
140
1990
1995
0
1980
2000
1985
1990
1995
2000
year
year
16.885
Aircraft Pricing
Cost-Based Pricing
Cost + Profit = Price
Personal aircraft
Business jets?
Military aircraft
Market-Based Pricing
Performance
Operating Cost
Market
Value
Competition
Passenger Appeal
Commercial transport
Source: Schaufele
9/19/2004
16.885
PRICE
Total AROC
CAROC
balance CAROC.
COST/WEIGHT
TRADE-OFF
(Capital costs)
9/19/2004
16.885
Figure A7 in Roskam:
16.885
9/19/2004
16.885
9/19/2004
16.885
Regression model:
16.885
Narrow bodies:
Narrow bodies
Estimated price
Estimated
price($M)
($M)
80
70
60
50
40
30
y=x
Airbus
Boeing
20
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Actual
price
($M)
Actual
price ($M)
Model from Markish, price data from Aircraft Value News, The
9/19/2004
16.885
Wide bodies:
0.508(Seats)2.76 0.697(Range) f (
CAROC)
Wide bodies
160
Estimated
($M)
Estimatedprice
price ($M)
140
120
100
80
60
y=x
Airbus
Boeing
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Actual
price ($M)
Actual
price
($M)
Model from Markish, price data from Aircraft Value News, The
Airline Monitor, 2001.
9/19/2004
16.885
Demand forecasts
Airbus
3500
Airline Monitor
3000
Quantity
Quantity
Assign to a
seat category
Assume a
market share
Demand forecast
20-year production
potential
Boeing
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
100
125
150
175+
200
250
300
350
400
500+
Seat
Category
Seat
Category
9/19/2004
16.885
400
350
300
250
units
narrow
200
y = 94.571e0.0228x
R2 = 0.3724
150
100
50
wide
y = 52.776e0.0167x
R2 = 0.4092
40
37
34
31
28
25
22
19
16
13
10
0
1
6-mo. period
9/19/2004
16.885
Valuation Techniques
16.885
16.885
Calculating NPV
16.885
NPV example
Period
Discount Factor
Cash Flow
Present Value
-150,000
-150,000
0.935
-100,000
-93,500
0.873
+300000
+261,000
Discount rate = 7%
9/19/2004
NPV =
16.885
$18,400
Discount Rate
9/19/2004
16.885
Payback Period
9/19/2004
16.885
Discounted payback
9/19/2004
16.885
C1
C2
CT
!
C0
2
T
1 IRR 1 IRR
1 IRR
IRR solution is not unique
Multiple rates of return for same project
IRR doesnt always correlate with NPV
NPV does not always decrease as discount rate
increases
9/19/2004
16.885
9/19/2004
16.885
Dynamic Programming
9/19/2004
16.885
Dynamic Programming:
Problem Formulation
The firm:
Portfolio of designs
Sequential development phases
Decision making
The market:
Sale price is steady
Quantity demanded is unpredictable
Units built = units demanded
Problem objective:
Which aircraft to design?
Which aircraft to produce?
When?
9/19/2004
16.885
Dynamic Programming:
Problem Elements
1. State variables
2. Control variables
st
ut
3. Randomness
4. Profit function
5. Dynamics
F
t (
st )
max S t ( st , ut )
Et >Ft 1 (
st
1 )
@
ut
1
r
Solution:
Solve iteratively.
9/19/2004
16.885
Dynamic Programming:
Operating Modes
How to model decision making?
9/19/2004
16.885
Example: BWB
Blended-Wing-Body (BWB):
concept
9/19/2004
16.885
operating mode
16
120
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
mode
demand
100
80
60
40
20
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
quantity demanded
per year
time (years)
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
0
10
12
14
16
-1,000,000
-2,000,000
-3,000,000
-4,000,000
time (years)
9/19/2004
16.885
of Flexibility
25
dynamic programming
20
15
10
5
0
-5
11
18
28
44
69
-10
initial annual demand forecast
16.885
References
Airbus Global Market Forecast, 2000-2019. Appendix G, Detailed passenger fleet results, p.
74.
Jane's All the World's Aircraft. London : Sampson Low, Marston & Co., 2001.
Markish, J. Valuation Techniques for Commercial Aircraft Program Design, S.M. Thesis, MIT,
June 2002.
Markish, J. and Willcox, K. Valuation Techniques for Commercial Aircraft Program Design,
Markish, J. and Willcox, K., A Value-Based Approach for Commercial Aircraft Conceptual
9/19/2004
16.885