Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 of 5
http://www.wikihow.com/Understand-Syllogisms
Steps
Know the basic structure of syllogisms. A syllogism has three parts: major
premise, minor premise, and conclusion. Each part is composed of two categorical
terms (terms that denote categories; such as birds, animals, etc.), linked in the form
"Some/all A is/are [not] B." Each of the premises has one term in common with the
conclusion: the major term in the major premise, which forms the predicate of the
conclusion, and the minor term in the minor premise, which forms the subject of the
conclusion. The categorical term in common in the premises is called the "middle term".
For example: Major premise: All birds are animals. Minor premise: All parrots are birds.
Conclusion: All parrots are animals. In this example, "animal" is the major term and
predicate of the conclusion, "parrot" is the minor term and subject of the conclusion,
and "bird" is the middle term.
Ad
Determine the figure of the syllogism. Depending on whether the middle term
serves as subject or predicate in the premises, a syllogism may be classified as
30-11-2015 14:56
2 of 5
http://www.wikihow.com/Understand-Syllogisms
Fourth figure: The middle term serves as predicate in the major premise and
subject in the minor premise. Thus, fourth figure takes the form: Major premise:
P-M..........e.g., "No birds are cows" Minor premise: M-S..........e.g., "All cows
are animals" Conclusion:......S-P..........e.g., "Some animals are not birds".
only if the conclusion necessarily follows the premises, i.e., if the premises are true, the
conclusion must be true. Although there are 256 possible forms (4 possible variations
(a, e, i, o) for each part, three parts (major premise, minor premise, conclusion), and
four figures, so 4*4*4*4=256) of syllogism, only 19 of them are valid. The valid forms for
each figure is given below, with their mnemonic names (each containing three vowels
specifying the form of the part (a, e, i, o) in order of major premise, minor premise,
conclusion):
First figure has 4 valid forms: Barbara, Celarent, Darii, Ferio
Barbara (AAA): for example,
All birds are animals.
All parrots are birds.
All parrots are animals.
Celarent (EAE): for example,
No birds are foxes.
All parrots are birds.
No parrots are foxes.
Darii (AII): for example,
All dogs are animals.
Some mammals are dogs.
Some mammals are animals.
Ferio (EIO): for example,
No dogs are birds.
Some mammals are dogs.
Some mammals are not birds.
Second figure has 4 valid forms: Cesare, Camestres, Festino, Baroco
Cesare (EAE): for example,
No foxes are birds.
All parrots are birds.
No parrots are foxes.
Camestres (AEE): for example,
All foxes are animals.
No trees are animals.
No trees are foxes.
Festino (EIO): for example,
No restaurant food is healthy.
Some recipes are healthy.
Some recipes are not restaurant foods.
Baroco (AOO): for example,
All liars are evil-doers.
Some doctors are not evil-doers.
Some doctors are not liars.
Third figure has 6 valid forms: *Darapti, Disamis, Datisi, Felapton, Bocardo,
Ferison
Darapti (AAI): for example,
All men are fallible.
All men are animals.
Some animals are fallible.
Disamis (IAI): for example,
Some books are precious.
All books are perishable.
Some perishable things are precious.
Datisi (AII): for example,
30-11-2015 14:56
3 of 5
http://www.wikihow.com/Understand-Syllogisms
Ad
Making rope?
Shaving?
Motorcycles?
Buying and
selling cars?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
30-11-2015 14:56
4 of 5
http://www.wikihow.com/Understand-Syllogisms
Tips
Note that if either of the premises is negative, the conclusion must also
be negative. If both premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also
be affirmative.
In order for a syllogism to be valid, at least one of the two premises
must contain a universal form. If both premises are particulars, then no
valid conclusion can follow. For example, if "some cats are black" and
"some black things are tables", it does not follow that "some cats are
tables".
Drawing out or visualising Venn Diagrams can help in understanding
distribution of terms in determining whether a given syllogism is valid
or not.
The universal affirmative (A) is represented as one circle (the
subject) entirely within another circle (the predicate).
The universal negative (E) is represented as two mutually
exclusive, non-overlapping circles.
The particulars (I, O) are represented as two intersecting circles,
each with area in common and area not in common with the other.
There is another way to mark up Venn Diagrams when solving
problems of categorical syllogisms: instead of using them in the
purely set-theoretical manner described above (also known as
"Euler Circles").
Draw three intersecting circles and use shading to indicate
absence (or impossibility), leave blank to indicate "no
knowledge", and a small '+' sign to indicate presence.
Now a valid categorical statement will have one of four forms:
either a lens fully shaded
a lune fully shaded
a '+' mark in a lens
a '+' mark in a lune
The syllogism is valid (in the classical Aristotelian sense)if the
circles representing Major and Minor Premises are one of four
forms: either a lens or lune fully shaded, or a '+' mark in lens or
lune.
This method works conveniently only for syllogisms of three
categorical statements only: Minor Premise, Major Premise and
Conclusion.
30-11-2015 14:56
5 of 5
http://www.wikihow.com/Understand-Syllogisms
In "No A are B" propositions, both the subject (A) and the predicate
(B) are distributed.
In "Some A are B" propositions, neither the subject nor the
predicate are distributed.
In "Some A are not B" propositions, the predicate (B) is distributed.
In order for a syllogism to be valid, at least one of the two premises
must be affirmative. If both premises are negative, then no valid
conclusion can follow. If both premises are negative, the middle cannot
establish any link between the major and minor terms.
Warnings
Beware of the fallacy of the illicit major, where the major term is
undistributed in the major premise but distributed in the conclusion. An
example of this is in the form All A are B; no C are A. Therefore, no C
are B. For instance, "All cats are animals"; "no dogs are cats";
therefore, "no dogs are animals": this syllogism is invalid because the
major term "animals" is undistributed in the major premise, but
distributed in the conclusion.
Beware of the fallacy of the illicit minor, where the minor term is
undistributed in the minor premise but distributed in the conclusion. An
example of this is in the form All A are B; all A are C. Therefore, all C
are B. For instance, "All cats are mammals"; "all cats are animals";
therefore, "all animals are mammals": this syllogism is invalid because
the minor term "animals" is undistributed in the minor premise
(because not all animals are cats), but distributed in the conclusion.
Article Info
Featured
Article
Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 384,747 times.
30-11-2015 14:56