Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PERFORMANCE
OFOFHIGHWAY
EMBANKMENTS
CONSTRUCTED
OVER
SRI
LANKAN
PERFORMANCE
HIGHWAY EMBANKMENTS
CONSTRUCTED
OVER SRI LANKAN
PEATY
SOILS
PEATY SOILS
W. A. Karunawardena1 and M. Toki2
Director General, National Building Research Organization, Sri Lanka and Senior Geotechnical Engineer, Southern Transport
Development
Project , Oriental
Ltd.,Geotechnical
Japan
1 Director General, National Building
Research Organization,
SriConsultants
Lanka andCo.,
Senior
Engineer, Southern Transport
2
Development
Project
,
Oriental
Consultants
Co.,
Ltd.,
Japan
Team Leader, Southern Transport Development Project, Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd., Japan
2 Team Leader, Southern Transport Development Project, Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd., Japan
ABSTRACT: The construction of the Southern Expressway in Sri Lanka involved extensive ground improvement work as many
parts of the Expressway traverses through flood plains and marshy ground consisting of very soft peat, organic soils, and clays.
ABSTRACT: The construction of the Southern Expressway in Sri Lanka involved extensive ground improvement work as many
Depending
on the
ground traverses
conditions,
various
methods
including
remove
andorganic
replacement,
preloading,
parts of the
Expressway
through
floodground
plains improvement
and marshy ground
consisting
of very
soft peat,
soils, and
clays.
preloading
withonvertical
drains,
dynamicvarious
compaction
vacuum consolidation
were applied
improve
the softpreloading,
soil to build
Depending
the ground
conditions,
groundand
improvement
methods including
remove toand
replacement,
preloading withwith
vertical
drains,
dynamic
compaction
consolidation
were applied
to improve
thelength
soft soil
to build
the
the embankments
heights
varying
from
2 m to 12and
m. vacuum
In this project,
embankments
of about
4 km in
were
constructed
embankments
heights
from
m application
to 12 m. In this
project,
embankments
of about The
4 kmlength
in length
wereembankments
constructed bythat
by improving
thewith
peaty
soil varying
basically
by 2the
of the
heavy
tamping method.
of the
improving the peaty soil basically by the application of the heavy tamping method. The length of the embankments that were built
werebybuilt
by improving
soil byassisted
vacuum
assisted surcharging
around
2.5 km.
details
of the field instrumentation
improving
the peatythe
soilpeaty
by vacuum
surcharging
is around 2.5iskm.
The details
of The
the field
instrumentation
program and
program
and field monitoring
program
to assess
soft ground
presented.ofThe
of the was
ground
field monitoring
program to assess
the soft
groundthe
improvement
areimprovement
presented. Theare
performance
the performance
ground improvement
evaluated in
terms
of the in
degree
of the
physical and
and increase
in
improvement
was
evaluated
termsofofconsolidation,
the degree ofimprovement
consolidation,
improvement
of engineering
the physicalproperties,
and engineering
properties,
pressure and gain
in shear
strength
of thestrength
peaty soil.
The
results
the results
post construction
settlement
and preconsolidation
increase in preconsolidation
pressure
and gain
in shear
of the
peaty
soil.ofThe
of the post surface
construction
surface
monitoring of the expressway carried out up to date reconfirm that the ground improvement work was very successful and the
settlement
of the expressway
carried
out up tolimit
dateof
reconfirm
that the ground improvement work was very successful
expectedmonitoring
residual settlements
are well below
the allowable
the contract.
and the expected residual settlements are well below the allowable limit of the contract.
1
INTRODUCTION
52 Geotechnical
Journal
Vol. 6 that
No. the
1 2014
The investigation
identified
soft ground area of the
Geotechnical
Vol.
1 2014pressure.
Different
energy
levels
had
to6 beNo.
imparted
by considering the
consolidation
and Journal
Pc is the
preconsolidation
anticipated settlement of the compressible layer under the
respective designed embankment heights. In the estimation of
settlements, all primary consolidation settlements and secondary
settlements at the end of 3 years after construction were
considered. The estimated settlement of peaty soil layers of
different thickness under various embankment heights is shown
in Figure 3. In the calculation of settlement, the values of 0.428,
0.0428, 0.05, and 20 kPa were used for the parameters cc(1+e0),
cr((1+e0 ), c , and Pc respectively where cc is the compression
index, e0 is the initial void ratio, cr is the recompression index,
c is the coefficient of secondary consolidation and P c is the
preconsolidation pressure.
settleme
less tha
introduc
The we
stacking
m by 2
equippe
pounder
is gover
configur
this ope
the tota
function
shown i
In the a
improve
the heig
0.6 and
Accordi
improve
function
of the
weightofofenergy
the tamper
andtothe
the total
amount
applied
thedrop
soil,height
whichasis a
shown
in
the
following
equation
as
reported
by
Lukas
(1995).
function of the weight of the tamper and the drop height as
shown in the following equation as reported by Lukas (1995).
(1)
3rdFigure
Proff3.18-02-2015
Predicted settlement in peaty clay due to different
ifferent
d settlement
irst, the soft
y a working
ovement of
drain) was
surface to
installation
up to a de
square pa
horizontal
top of th
connected
horizontal
installed a
ditches we
20 m in
perforated
displacem
settlement
After insta
pipes and
covered by
laid on top
provide a
boundary
applied us
Industry C
hoses to th
leaks throu
with and
without
fibre
drains
54settlement
Geotechnical
Journal
Vol.
6 No.
1 2014
Water hose
Monitoring unit
Pump unit
Drain water
Suction hose
Secondary
separator tank
Airtight sheet
Vacuum pressure
Perforated pipe
Vertical drain
Figure 7.
Schematic construction of compact vacuum
Consolidation
In the application of vacuum consolidation method, about a 1.0 m
toIn1.5
thick fill was
constructed
on the original
themapplication
of vacuum
consolidation
method,ground
about asurface
1.0
tomform
a
working
platform
for
the
band
drain
installation
machine.
to 1.5 m thick fill was constructed on the original ground
Band drains were installed by a machine up to a designed depth
from the original ground surface in a square pattern with a spacing
54
of 1 m. Thereafter, flexible horizontal drains (300 mm wide and
4 mm thick) were laid on top of the fill with a horizontal spacing
of 1 m and then connected to the vertical band drains in order to
ensure adequate horizontal drainage capacity. Subsequently, the tank
system was installed and connected to the designed pipe systems.
Small ditches were excavated perpendicular to the horizontal drains
at 20 m intervals and filled with aggregates after placing perforated
pipes. Instrumentation such as settlement plates, displacement stakes,
electrical piezometers and differential settlement gauges were also
installed at the designed depths. After installation of vertical drains,
horizontal drains, perforated pipes and separator tanks, the surface of
the treatment area was covered by a protection sheet. Thereafter, an
air tight sheet was laid on top and the periphery trench system was
constructed to provide air tightness and the necessary anchorage at
the boundary of the treatment area. Vacuum pressure was then applied
using a vacuum pumping system patented by Maruyama Industry Co.
Ltd, Japan by connecting the suction and water hoses to the vacuum
pump. After confirming that there were no leaks through the air tight
sheet, filling was commenced.
Sta.47+850
SP-1 SP-6
SP-2 SP-5
70m
10m
SP-7
SP-8
Vacuum
acquisition unit
10m
Water
discharge
SP-3 SP-4
Sta.47+920
Surface settlement plates
Sub surface settlement gauge
SP-9
Water
discharge
record meters
Piezometer
Settlement stakes
Figure 9.
2.3
Settlement stakes
surface
settlement
the shows
settlement
gauge installed
3rd Proff
The 18-02-2015
loading
curveofthat
the placement
of theunder
fill,
6.1 ground
Estimation
of of
degree
ofachieved
Consolidation
The
improvement
was investigated by
6.1 Estimation
of degree
Consolidation
calculating
the
degree
of
consolidation
using
observed field
The ground improvement achieved was the
investigated
by
settlements
before
termination
of the
vacuum
operation
andfield
the
The ground
improvement
achieved
was
investigated
byobserved
calculating
calculating
the
degree
of consolidation
using the
removal
surcharge.
The
degree
ofobserved
consolidation
is
calculated
the degree
ofofconsolidation
using
thethe
settlements
settlements
before termination
of
vacuum field
operation
and the
the
ratio
of
the
current
settlement
to
the
expected
ultimate
beforeas
termination
of
the
vacuum
operation
and
the
removal
of
removal of surcharge. The degree of consolidation is calculated
primary
settlement.
In thesettlement
present
work,
ultimate
primary
surcharge.
degree
consolidation
is calculated
as the ratio
of
as theThe
ratio
of theofcurrent
to the expected
ultimate
settlement
and theto degree
consolidation
were
estimated
by
the current
settlement
the
ultimate
primary
settlement.
primary
settlement.
In expected
theof present
work,
ultimate
primary
method
outlined
in Asaoka
(1978)
and and
hyperbolic
method
In thethe
present
work,
ultimate
primary
settlement
degree
ofby
settlement
and
the
degree
of consolidation
werethe
estimated
described
inoutlined
Tan
etin al.
usingandoutlined
the
measured
field
consolidation
were
estimated
by(1991)
the(1978)
method
in Asaoka
the method
Asaoka
hyperbolic
method
settlement
data.
(1978)
and
hyperbolic
method
described
in
Tan
et
al.
(1991)
using
the
described in Tan et al. (1991) using the measured field
measured
field settlement
data.
settlement
data.
The graphical plot of the Asaoka method based on the observed
The graphical
plot
of the center
Asaokaofmethod
based (SP
on the
observed
settlement
under
embankment
at
vacuum
The graphical
plotthe
of the of
Asaoka
method based
on5)the
observed
settlement
under ground
the
center
embankment
(SP 5)
at vacuum
consolidated
improvement
section
from
Ch.47+850
km
settlement
under
the
center
of
embankment
(SP
5)
at
consolidated
ground km
improvement
section
from
Ch.47+850 kmvacuum
to Ch.
to
Ch.
47+920
is
shown
in
Figure
10.
consolidated
ground
improvement
section from Ch.47+850 km
47+920
km is shown
in Figure
10.
to Ch. 47+920 km is shown in Figure 10.
devices
nitoring
ankment
nt up to
o once a
mp and
en from
Si
Si
2.1
2.2
- 0.8638
2.0
2.1
S - 1.993m- 0.8638
1.9
2.0
1.8
1.9
1.7
1.8
1.7
S - 1.993 m
45o
1.7
o
451.8
1.9
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
S i-1
S i-1
Figure 10. Graphical plot of Asaoka
method
Figure
10.that
Graphical
plotofofCVC
Asaoka
methodthe achieved degree
It
is seen
at the end
treatment
It is seen that at the end of CVC treatment the achieved degree of
of
consolidation
is
around
97%.
The
degree
consolidation
It is seen thatisataround
the end
of CVC
treatment
the of
achieved
degree
consolidation
97%.
Theondegree
of
consolidation
was also
was
also
calculated
based
the
pore
water
pressure
of consolidation
is the
around
97%.
The
degree
of consolidation
calculated
based
on
pore
water
pressure
measurements
(PWP),
measurements
(PWP), and
laboratory
consolidation
testing
of
waslaboratory
also calculated
based
on the
pore water
pressure
and
consolidation
testing
of
peaty
samples
after
the
peaty
samples
after
the
treatment
program.
The
comparison
measurements
(PWP),
and laboratory
consolidation
testing of
of
treatment
program.
The comparison
ofmethod
the
degree
of consolidation
the
degree
of
consolidation
for
each
is
shown
in
Table
peaty
the treatment
for
eachsamples
method after
is shown
in Table 1.program. The comparison of
1.
the degree of consolidation for each method is shown in Table
1.
Table
1. Estimation of the degree of consolidation
Table 1. Estimation of the degree
of consolidation
Degree
of Consolidation
Location
Asaoka Degree
Laboratory
of Consolidation PWP
Method
Data
Location
Asaoka
Laboratory
PWP
Ch. 45+380
83.10%
Method
Data
97.83%
79.46%
Ch. 45+430
73.87%
Ch. 45+380
83.10%
97.83%
79.46%
100.00%
45+430
Ch. 47+850
73.87%
97.10%
100.00%
Ch. 47+920
100.00%
100.00%
Ch. 47+850
97.10%
100.00%
80.21%
Ch.
47+920
Ch. 52+950
100.00%
97.57%
100.00%
Ch. 53+000
90.91%
80.21%
Ch. 52+950
97.57%
100.00%
Ch.
53+000
96.70%
90.91%
Ch. 53+660
96.65%
68.71%
Ch. 53+730
83.62%
96.70%
Ch. 53+660
96.65%
68.71%
Ch. 53+730
83.62%
ayout
uated in
of the
2.2
2.3
ge
meters
ROUND
Figure
9. Field monitoring data
2.3
55
55If the degree of consolidation from the PWP measurement is assumed
to be accurate, Asaoka Method accurately estimates the degree
of consolidation in treatment areas 47 + 850 to 47 + 920 and 52 +
950 to 53 + 00 whereas Asaoka method over predicts the degree of
consolidation in treatment areas 45 + 380 to 45 + 430 and 53 + 660 to
53 + 730. However, in treatment area 53 + 660 to 53 + 730 the degree
of consolidation from the laboratory test results agree very well with
the same estimated from the Asaoka method. Therefore, based on
this investigation it can be concluded that the degree of consolidation
estimated from the Asaoka method is reasonably accurate.
m
tion unit
Si
fill, the
nder the
re under
zometer
rge rate
he CVC
and 9(d)
- 0.8638
2.0
S - 1.993 m
1.9
1.8
45o
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
Unimproved Area
BH4
BH3
BH5
BH2 BH1
3
m
BH6
Improved
Area
BH7
47+920
Vane Shear
Bore Hole
ement is
estimates
0 to 47 +
hod over
45 + 380
treatment
from the
estimated
estigation
estimated
for each
dicted by
riod of 3
plot of
ate, with
he likely
only after
both the
described
Crest
Center
Fill Height
11.1 m
3m
Settlement 2 m
Fill Material
Peaty/
Organic
Soil
56
(SPT N) Value
Silty Sand
l ground
ping and
moval of
d as well
e ground
g of bore
ection of
hear Test
ory tests.
es of peat
ibed in
of the
Ch. 47+
d subsoil
shown in
are also
Area BH1
3.5
266
4.50
1.95
0.061
120
Improved
3.5
141
1.81
0.90
0.037
55
3.06
2.66
1.810
2.000
47.43
% Change
of Water
Content
56.75
66.25
% Change
of Void
Ratio
42.66
62.36
61.89
57.79
67.33
65.23
53.56
77.55
53.66
72.41
22.40
35.15
40.85
24.81
6.0
5.0
oid ratio
roperties
4.0
3.0
Pc = 33 kPa
Pc = 180 kPa
Improved Area-BH5
5.85
2.85
378.3
471.2
175.7
105.8
4.10
9.35
1.900
2.580
51.28
53.56
77.55
53.66
72.41
3rd Proff
18-02-20155.25
Ch.53+730
2.76
111.6
122.9
86.6
79.7
3.06
2.66
1.810
2.000
47.43
22.40
35.15
40.85
24.81
Ch.52+950Ch.53+000
Ch.53+660-
eo
cc
cu
(kPa)
Improved
Area BH1
3.0
227
4.21
1.80
0.055
85
3.5
266
4.50
1.95
0.061
120
Improved
Area BH2, 5
3.5
141
1.81
0.90
0.037
55
4.5
168
1.94
1.94
0.048
70
Unimproved
Area BH3
2.5
370
5.54
2.13
0.110
22
3.5
398
5.58
2.65
0.120
33
6.3
in Preconsolidation
Pressure
andand
Undrained
Shear
6.3ncrease
Increase
in Preconsolidation
Pressure
Undrained
Strength
Shear Strength
expectedthat
thatthe
thesubsoil
subsoilbehaves
behavesin inanan
over
consolidated
ItItisisexpected
over
consolidated
state
state during
the service
life structure
of the structure
the completion
during
the service
life of the
after theafter
completion
of ground
of ground improvement.
This can
bepre-consolidation
verified by the pressure
preimprovement.
This can be verified
by the
consolidation
pressure
determined
through
the
1-D
determined through the 1-D consolidation test. Consolidation
tests
consolidation test. Consolidation tests carried out from section
carried out from section Ch.47+850 to Ch.47+920 indicated that
Ch.47+850 to Ch.47+920 indicated that the preconsolidation
the preconsolidation pressure of the peaty soil found under the
pressure of the peaty soil found under the embankment has
embankment
has 28
increased
from
28range
kPa to38160
kPakPa
range
to 160
increased from
kPa 38
kPa
180
kPakPa
range
180 kPa
range
after
ground
improvement
as
shown
in
Figure
after ground improvement as shown in Figure 12. The12.
The
expected
induced
peaty
layer
to the
proposed
expected
loadload
induced
on on
the the
peaty
layer
duedue
to the
proposed
2 2
embankment
is
around
145
kN/m
.
Therefore,
the
subsoil
will
will
embankment is around 145 kN/m . Therefore, the subsoil behave
under
the under
over consolidated
with an Over
Ratio
behave
the over state
consolidated
state Consolidation
with an Over
(OCR)
of 1.2
to Ratio
1.3 during
theofservice
the highway
and life
hence
Consolidation
(OCR)
1.2 to life
1.3 of
during
the service
d void ratio due
to CVC
improvement
will
give rise and
to very
small
settlements
in rise
the future.
of only
the highway
hence
will
only give
to very small
% Change
% Change
% Change
settlements
in the future.
ntent (%)
Void Ratio
Waterother sections
of Void also
in Thickness
Consolidation test results
related to ofsome
Consolidation
test results
related to some
other sections also
Content
of Peat
Final
Initial thatFinal
indicated
the pre-consolidation
pressure
of the peatyRatio
soil found
indicated
that
the pre-consolidation pressure
of the peaty
soil
163.6 under
6.83the embankment
3.916
56.75
42.66
has
increased
as
shown
in
Table
4. Table
70.13has increased as shown in Table
found under the embankment
4.
137.3 4 also
10.11
3.805
66.25
62.36 due to
the expected
load induced
on theonpeaty
layer
Table shows
4 also shows
the expected
load induced
the peaty
layer
the
proposed embankment
and the subsoil
over consolidation
ratio.
due
proposed embankment
and
141.0
5.54to the1.810
61.89the subsoil
67.33over
According
to
the
data
in
Table
4,
the
sub
soil
will
behave
under
57.45
consolidation ratio. According to the data in Table 4, the subthe
168.0 over
5.58
1.940state with an Over Consolidation
57.79
65.23
Ratio
soil consolidated
will behave under
the over consolidated state with
an(OCR)
Over of
0.98
to 1.33. It Ratio
should(OCR)
be noted
here tothat
even
though be
thenoted
applied
Consolidation
of
0.98
1.33.
It
should
175.7
4.10
1.900
53.56
53.66
vacuum
and the
fill
surcharge
load
is adequate
to fill
yield
51.28
here thatpressure
even though
the
applied
vacuum
pressure
and the
105.8 ansurcharge
9.35
2.580
77.55
72.41
load
adequate
OCR
value in the
range
of
OCR value
inis the
range to
ofyield
1.2 toan1.3,
sometimes
the
calculated
1.2
to
sometimes
calculatedvalue.
OCR
is less
than
that
OCR
is 1.3,
less than
that thethe
anticipated
This
might
be
due the
to the
86.6
3.06
1.810
22.40
40.85
47.43
anticipated
might
be the
dueconsolidation
to 35.15
the inaccurate
Pca value
inaccurate
value This
obtained
from
test as
result of
79.7
2.66 Pcvalue.
2.000
24.81
obtained
from the consolidation test as a result of sample
sample
disturbance.
disturbance.
6.0
5.0
85
4.0
120
55
70
22
33
drained
solidated
mpletion
the prehe 1-D
m section
olidation
ment has
180 kPa
12. The
void ratio
cu
(kPa)
The SPT and Field Vane Shear results indicate that the strength has
improved
in the compressible layer due to the ground improvement
6.0
and as a result the status of the compressible layer has been changed
Pc = 33 kPa
from
state. The strength gained due to ground
5.0very soft to medium stiff Unimproved
Area- BH3
improvement was investigated by calculating the ratio between the
increments
of undrained shear strength of peaty soil and the effective
4.0
kPasoil was determined from
c = 180
stress . The undrained cohesion ofPthe
peaty
unconsolidated un-drained triaxial tests
and the
preconsolidation
Improved
Area-BH5
3.0
pressure was obtained from oedometer tests on undisturbed soil
samples. The ratio between the increment of undrained shear strength
2.0
of peaty soil and the effective stress after the treatment program was
obtained to be 0.25 to 0.49.
1.0
Improved Area-BH1
7 OBSERVED SETTLEMENT
AFTER PAVEMENT
Pc = 160 kPa
0.0
CONSTRUCTION
1
10
100
1000
10000
The surface settlement of thelog
highway
(stress)embankment constructed over
the improved soft ground was monitored by installing the settlement
Figure
12. Consolidation
Testafter
Results
markers
at 50 m intervals
construction of the road pavement.
The
observed
total
surface
settlement
up tothat
September
2012, ten
The SPT
and FieldJournal
Vane Shear
the strength
Geotechnical
6results
No.
1indicate
2014 Figure
after in
opening
to Vol.
traffic,
is shown
13. ground
hasmonths
improved
the compressible
layer in
due to the
improvement and as a result the status of the compressible layer
Tablechanged
4. Increase
in preconsolidation
pressure
andstate.
undrained
has been
from
very soft to medium
stiff
The
shear
strength
strength
gained
due to ground improvement was investigated by
calculating the ratio between the increments of undrained shear
strength of peaty soilExpecte
and the effective stress (cu / v ) . The
Pc
Cu (cu / v
Location
d Load
OCR
undrained
cohesion of
the peaty
soil was
determined
(kPa)
(kPa) from
(kPa)triaxial tests and the preconsolidation
unconsolidated un-drained
pressureCh.45+38
was obtained from oedometer
on undisturbed
soil
180 tests1.13
79.0
0.49
0- The ratio between
160.0 the increment of undrained shear
samples.
160
1.00
57.0
0.36
Ch.45+430
strength
of peaty soil and the effective stress after the treatment
Ch.47+85
200
1.37
55.0
0.36
program was obtained to be 0.25 to 0.49.
0145.0
180
1.25
70.0
0.45
Ch.47+920
void ratio
Location
Ch.52+95 SETTLEMENT
OBSERVED
150 AFTER
0.98 PAVEMENT
41.5
0.27
0152.5
CONSTRUCTION
170
1.11
38.2
0.25
Ch.53+000
Ch.53+66
170 embankment
1.13
54.0
0.36
The surface
of the highway
constructed
0- settlement 150.0
147
0.98by installing
50.5
0.34
over the
improved soft ground was
monitored
the
Ch.53+730
settlement markers at 50 m intervals after construction of the
road pavement. The observed total surface settlement up to
September 2012, ten months after opening to traffic, is shown in
Figure 13.
7
57
Unimproved Area- BH3
Pc = 180 kPa
Improved Area-BH5
2.0
1.0
Pc = 160 kPa
0.0
1
10
100
log (stress)
Improved Area-BH1
1000
10000
AC
The autho
Sri Lanka
towards w
10
RE
Asaoka, A
Soil and F
Karunawa
Clay usin
University
Karunawa
embankm
method fo
17th Int
Engineeri
Pc = 33 kPa
3.0
carried ou
properties
soil will b
to 1.3 dur
post con
expresswa
improvem
settlement
Karunawa
Tamping
of a Hig
Conferenc
Hong Kon
Karunarat
Oriental
Developm
(2007).
Lukas, R
Dynamic
95-037, U
Tan, T.S.
consolidat
ASCE ( 1
10 REFERENCES
Asaoka, A. Observational Procedure of Settlement Prediction. Soil
and Foundation, (1978), 18(4): 87-101
Karunawardena, A. Consolidation Analysis of Sri Lankan Peaty Clay
using Elasto-viscoplastic Theory. Doctoral Thesis, Kyoto University,
Japan. (2007).
Karunawardena, A. and Nithiwana, W. Construction of a trial
embankment on peaty ground using vacuum consolidation method
for a highway construction project in Sri Lanka. Proc., 17th Int. Conf.
on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Alexandria,Vol. 3.
. (2009), pp. 2200-2203
Karunawardena, A. and Toki, M. Application of the Heavy Tamping
Method on Sri Lankan Peaty Clay for the Construction of a Highway
Embankment. Proc. of 14th Asian Regional Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Hong Kong, China. (2011)
Karunaratne, G.P. Technical report on Heavy Tamping Trial, Oriental
Consultants Co., Ltd., Japan, Southern Transport Development
Project, JABIC founded Section, Sri Lanka (2007).
Lukas, R. G. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 1, Dynamic
Compaction, Federal Highway Report. FHWA-SA-95-037, U.S.A.
(1995)
Tan, T.S., Inoue, T. & Lee, S.L. Hyperbolic method for consolidation
analysis, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE ( 1991),117(11):
17231737
Director
General,National
National Building
Building Research
Organization,
Sri Lanka
1 Director
General,
Research
Organization,
Sri Lanka
2
2 Former
Geotechnical
Engineer,
National
Building
Research
Organization,
Sri Lanka
Former Geotechnical Engineer, National Building Research Organization, Sri Lanka
ABSTRACT: The specified maximum allowable residual settlement under an embankment fill could be far too excessive and
fatal at bridge approaches for high speed vehicles. Therefore, it is necessary that there should not be any settlement at the adjacent
ABSTRACT:
The near
specified
maximum
allowable
settlement
under
embankment
fill opposite
could be far
and fatal at
embankment
the bridge
deck
and notresidual
more than
about 10
mmansettlement
at the
endtoo
of excessive
the embankment,
saybridge
20 m
approaches
for
high
speed
vehicles.
Therefore,
it
is
necessary
that
there
should
not
be
any
settlement
at
the
adjacent
embankment
near
away.As such, it is understood that the embankment for the bridge approach must be improved adequately in order to achieve
the
bridge
deck
and
not
more
than
about
10
mm
settlement
at
the
opposite
end
of
the
embankment,
say
20
m
away.As
such,
it is
the above objectives. This paper reports a case history of the design and performance of geogrid- reinforced piled embankments
understood that the embankment for the bridge approach must be improved adequately in order to achieve the above objectives. This
constructed
in and
the Southern
Expressway
in Sri
Lanka.
In the present
work,atgeosynthetic
paper
reports ata the
casebridge
historyapproaches
of the design
performance
of geogrid-project
reinforced
piled
embankments
constructed
the bridge
reinforcement
hasSouthern
been successfully
pileInfoundations
improve
settlement
performance.
from the
approaches
in the
Expresswayincorporated
project in Sriwith
Lanka.
the present to
work,
geosynthetic
reinforcement
hasThe
beenload
successfully
embankmentwith
is effectively
transferred
to thesettlement
columns using
multipleThe
layers
geosynthetic
reinforcement
embedded
in the to
gravel
incorporated
pile foundations
to improve
performance.
loadoffrom
the embankment
is effectively
transferred
the
columns
usingacts
multiple
layers
of geosynthetic
reinforcement
embedded
thereduces
gravel mat,
which acts as
a load transfer
platformofthat
mat, which
as a load
transfer
platform that
bridges over
the pilesinand
the differential
settlement
at the surface
the
bridges
over theIn
piles
reduces
the differential
settlement
at thethe
surface
of methodology,
the embankment.
this paperanalysis,
the information
about
embankment.
thisand
paper
the information
about
the project,
design
the In
numerical
and details
ofthe
the
project, the design methodology, the numerical analysis, and details of the construction together with the results of the field settlement
construction together with the results of the field settlement monitoring carried out during and after embankment construction
monitoring carried out during and after embankment construction are presented.
are presented.
Keywords: soft ground, peat, differential settlement, geogrid-reinforced piled embankment, pile foundations
Keywords: soft ground, peat, differential settlement, geogrid-reinforced piled embankment, pile foundations
1 INTRODUCTION
The
Southern Highway is Sri Lanka's first E Class highway that links
1 INTRODUCTION
the Sri Lankas Commercial Capital Colombo with Matara, a major
TheinSouthern
Highway
is Sri The
Lankas
first
highway
that
city
the south
of the island.
length
of E96Class
km section
from
links the to
SriGalle
Lankas
Capital
Colombo
Matara,
Colombo
hadCommercial
been completed
and
openedwith
to traffic
in a
major city 2011.
in the Many
south of
the of
island.
lengthtraverse
of 96 km
section
November
parts
the The
highway
through
from
Colombo
to
Galle
had
been
completed
and
opened
to
traffic
flood plains and marshy ground consisting of very soft peat,in
November
2011.
of the highway
traverse
through
organic
soils,
andMany
clays.parts
Especially,
in the major
flood
plainflood
of
plains and marshy
ground consisting
very soft
peat,
organic
soils,
Welipenna
River, Bentota
River and of
Gingaga
River
areas,
where
and clays.
Especially,
the deposits
major flood
plain
of Welipenna
River,
thick
peat and
organicinclay
were
found.
Many ground
Bentota River and Gingaga River areas, where thick peat and organic
improvement methods such as surcharging, surcharging with preclay deposits were found. Many ground improvement methods such
fabricated vertical drains, rock replacement, heavy tamping and
as surcharging, surcharging with pre-fabricated vertical drains, rock
vacuum consolidation were used to improve the soft soil in order
replacement, heavy tamping and vacuum consolidation were used
to control the post construction settlements and to ensure the
to improve the soft soil in order to control the post construction
stability of the highway embankment. According to the technical
settlements and to ensure the stability of the highway embankment.
specification, the embankment had to be designed and
According to the technical specification, the embankment had to
constructed by improving the soft ground in order to control the
be designed and constructed by improving the soft ground in order
continued settlement within 15cm at the road center after a
to control the continued settlement within 15cm at the road center
period of 3 years following the acceptance of the pavement. The
after a period of 3 years following the acceptance of the pavement.
application of the above soft ground improvement methods and
The application of the above soft ground improvement methods
performance
of highway
roadroad
embankments
constructed
and performance
of highway
embankments
constructedusing
using
different
ground
improvement
techniques
have
been
different ground improvement techniques have beendescribed
describedbyby
Karunawardena
Karunawardena and
and Toki
Toki(2013).
(2013).
In addition to the above soft ground improvement work, special
In addition to the above soft ground improvement work, special
treatments were done in the construction of bridge and underpass
treatments were done in the construction of bridge and
approaches in soft ground areas in order to create a smooth
underpass approaches in soft ground areas in order to create a
transferring of expected differential settlements between the
smooth transferring of expected differential settlements between
approach embankment and the bridge deck. There are about 18 nos.
the approach embankment and the bridge deck. There are about
bridges and underpass approaches located in the soft ground areas
18 nos. bridges and underpass approaches located in the soft
within the first 34 km of Sothern Expressway trace and four of them
ground areas within the first 34 km of Sothern Expressway trace
are on major flood plains and contain a thick deposit of very soft
and four of them are on major flood plains and contain a thick
highly compressible peat. To mitigate the settlement effect, rock
deposit
of very
soft highly
compressible
peat.
To mitigate
the
replacement
method
was carried
out as the
ground
improvement
settlement
effect,
rock
replacement
method
was
carried
out
as
for the bridge and the underpass approach locations which consist
the
ground
improvement
for
the
bridge
and
the
underpass
of thin layers of soft soils in the subsurface. Alternatively, Geogrid
approach
locations
which consist(GRPE)
of thin has
layers
of soft
soils inforthethe
Reinforced
Piled Embankment
been
proposed
subsurface.
Alternatively,
Geogrid
Reinforced
Piled
Embankment
bridge approach locations which consist of very soft to soft, highly
(GRPE) has been proposed for the bridge approach locations
required forJournal
the design.
shows the assumed subsurface
Geotechnical
Vol. 6Figure
No. 122014
Geotechnical
Journal
Vol. 6Vol.
No.61 2014
60
Geotechnical
Journal
No. 1 2014
required for the design. Figure 2 shows the assumed subsurface
required for the design. Figure 2 shows the assumed subsurface
20.36
-
11.9
25.4
3.5~4.1
required
repair is mainly based on required
hazard
The design
designofofpilepile
arrangement
The
arrangement
is mainly
based on required settlement
2
settlement profile. 400x400 mm square precast concrete piles
profile. 4400x400 Large
mm2 square
precast
concrete
piles with
a precast
bump,
safety
>75
with
precast concrete
pile cap
with 0.8m x 0.8m dimensions
'
Depth/(m)
15.7 ~- 16.7
13.9525.4
~ 14.95
3.1 aArrangement
of Piles
concrete
pile caphazard
with
0.8m x 0.8m dimensions were used in the
were used in the construction of GRPE system. Piles were driven
3 DESIGN
CONCEPT compressive strength test
construction
of GRPE
Piles
wereincreasing
driven into
the2.5
weathered
Unconfined
into the weathered
rocksystem.
at a grid
spacing
from
m to
UCS/(N/mm)
20.36
11.9
rock
at
a
grid
spacing
increasing
from
2.5
m
to
3.0
m.
The
design
of
pile
arrangement
is
mainly
based
on
required
3.0
Depth/(m)
15.7 ~ 16.7
13.95 ~ 14.95
3.1m. Arrangement of Piles
2
settlement profile. 400x400 mm square precast concrete piles
A bridge approach must be constructed to allow road way to meet
Awith
closed
spacing
isconcrete
maintained
near
the
bridge
minimize
a
precast
pile
cap
with
0.8mapproach
x 0.8m todimensions
the
elevation of the bridge.
to provide
UCS/(N/mm)
20.36Therefore, it is necessary
11.9
AThe
closed
spacing
is
maintained
near
the
bridge
approach
to
the
differential
settlement
between
the
bridge
deck
and
approach
arrangement
is mainly
based
required
weredesign
used inofthepile
construction
of 2GRPE
system.
Piles on
were
driven
3 smooth
DESIGNtransition
CONCEPT(reduced differential settlement) at bridge
minimize
the
differential
settlement
between
the
bridge
deck
and
square
precast
concrete
piles
settlement
profile.
400x400
mm
embankment.
Pile
spacing
is
then
increased
with
the
increase
of
into the weathered rock at a grid spacing increasing from 2.5 m
to
approaches and the bridge. This can be achieved by transferring
approach
embankment.
Pile
spacing
is
then
increased
with
the
with
a
precast
concrete
pile
cap
with
0.8m
x
0.8m
dimensions
distance
away
from
the
approach
slab
to
ensure
the
smooth
transition
3.0 m.
the differential settlement between the embankments and the
increase
of distance
awaytofrom
the
approach
slab
to ensure
the
A bridge approach
be constructed
allow road
way toriding
meet
were
used
insettlement
the construction
of GRPE
system.
Piles
were
driven
of
differential
an adequate
distance
without
creating
an
deck
to anmust
adequate
length totoensure
a smooth
DESIGN
CONCEPT
33 bridge
DESIGN
CONCEPT
smooth
transition
ofrock
differential
settlement
to an from
adequate
the
elevation
of
the
bridge.
Therefore,
it
is
necessary
to
provide
into
the
weathered
at
a
grid
spacing
increasing
2.5
m to
surface. Long et.al (1998) classified the approach embankment
abrupt
vertical
jump
at
the
beginning
of
the
bridge
approach
A closed spacing is maintained near the bridge approach to
smooth transition (reduced differential settlement) at bridge
3.0 m.
minimize the differential settlement between the bridge deck and
A
bridge
approach
must
be
constructed
to
allow
road
way
to
meet
A
bridge
approach
must
be
constructed
to
allow
road
way
to
meet
the
approaches and the bridge. This can be achieved by transferring 60
approach embankment. Pile spacing is then increased with the
the
elevation
of
the
bridge.
Therefore,
it
is
necessary
to
provide
elevation
of
the
bridge.
Therefore,
it
is
necessary
to
provide
smooth
the differential settlement between the embankments and the
A closedofspacing
maintained
near
the bridge
to
increase
distanceis away
from the
approach
slab toapproach
ensure the
smoothdeck
transition
(reduced
settlement)
at bridge
transition
(reduced
differentialdifferential
settlement)
at bridge
approaches
bridge
to an adequate
length
to ensure
a smooth
riding
3.2
Designthe
of Load
Transfer
Platform
minimize
differential
settlement
between thetobridge
deck and
smooth
transition
of
differential
settlement
an
adequate
approaches
the(1998)
bridge.
This canby
betransferring
achieved by
and
the bridge.
This
can
be classified
achieved
thetransferring
differential
surface.
Longand
et.al
the
approach
embankment
approach embankment. Pile spacing is then increased with the
the differential
settlement
between the
andtothe
The load transfer platform (LTP) transfers the load to piles. It is
settlement
between
the embankments
andembankments
the bridge deck
an
increase of distance away from the approach slab to ensure the
bridge deck
to toanensure
adequate
length
to ensure
smooth
riding 60 assumed that this reinforced LTP acts as a beam, which transfers the
adequate
length
a smooth
riding
surface. aLong
et.al (1998)
smooth
of differential
settlement
to ofanLTP,
adequate
load
to pilestransition
(Collin 2004).
Accordingly,
in the design
it
surface. Long
(1998)embankmentbridge
classified the approach
embankment
classified
the et.al
approach
structure
interface
movements qualitatively as given in Table 2 and the approximated
differential settlements related to each rating are also given in the 60
same table.
c' Unconfined compressive
8.85
strength test
was equal to one half the clear span between piles, and the soil
layers of reinforcement was 200- 450 mm, the platform thickness
arch
was to
fully
within
depth piles,
of the
was equal
onedeveloped
half the clear
spanthe
between
andplatform.
the soil
Therefore, the thickness of the LTP was selected as 1.2m, which
arch was fully developed within the depth of the platform.
was
tentatively
half of the
pileLTP
spacing.
A granular
material
is
Therefore,
the thickness
of the
was selected
as 1.2m,
which
compulsory
to
be
in
the
LTP
and
hence
dense
graded
aggregate
was tentatively halfGeotechnical
of the pile spacing.
granular
is
Journal AVol.
6 No. material
1 2014 61
base course (ABC) material was planned to be used for LTP.
compulsory to be in the LTP and hence dense graded aggregate
course (ABC)
material was planned to be used for LTP.
4DETAILED
DETAILED
ANALYSIS
4base
ANALYSIS
4 DETAILED ANALYSIS
Thecurrent
current
problem
is mainly
related
to deformation
soft
soil
The
problem
is mainly
related
to deformation
of softofsoil
under
under
a veryproblem
complex
load
transferring
system
and
even
more
a The
verycurrent
complex
load transferring
system
and
even
more
complex
is mainly related to deformation of soft soil
complex
geometry
due load
to the
the bridge
approach.
geometry
tocomplex
the skewness
of skewness
the bridgeof
approach.
ismore
very
under
a due
very
transferring
system
andThere
even
There
is
very
few
or
almost
no
closed
form
solution
to
estimate
complex
geometry
due form
to thesolution
skewness
of the bridge
approach.
few
or almost
no closed
to estimate
deformations
of
deformations
of
this
of ano
problem.
There
few
orkind
almost
closed form solution to estimate
this
kindisofvery
a problem.
deformations of this kind of a problem.
The
Theapplication
applicationofofthree
threedimensional
dimensionalFinite
FiniteElement
Element (FE)
(FE) analyses
would
bebe
ideal
for the
analysis
of deformations.
However,
the analysis
would
ideal
for
the
analysis
of
deformations.
However,
the
The application of three dimensional Finite Element (FE) analyses
analysis
would
require
very
powerful
computers
and
longer
time.
would
require
very
powerful
computers
and
longer
time.
Even
if
it
is
would be ideal for the analysis of deformations. However, the
Even
if
it
is
used,
the
results
may
not
differ
very
much
when
used,
the
results
may
not
differ
very
much
when
compared
with
a
two
analysis would require very powerful computers and longer time.
compared
a two
Therefore,
carrying
out
dimensional
Therefore,
outdiffer
a twovery
dimensional
FE
Even
if it with
ismodel.
used,
thedimensional
resultscarrying
maymodel.
not
much
when
a
two
dimensional
FE
Analysis
is
worth
and
a
software
package
Analysis
is worth
package
called
PLAXIScarrying
8.2 2D was
compared
with aand
twoa software
dimensional
model.
Therefore,
out
PLAXIS 8.2 2D
was used
for theand
analysis.
In the
finite
acalled
two
Analysis
worth
a software
package
used
for dimensional
the analysis. FE
In the
finite is
element
analysis,
the problem
was
element
analysis,
the
problem
was
solved
as
a
two-dimensional
called asPLAXIS
8.2 2D was plane
used strain
for the
analysis.
finite
solved
a two-dimensional
problem
withIna the
symmetry
plane strain
problem
with a symmetry
condition
applied at the
element
analysis,
solved
as a two-dimensional
condition
applied
atthe
the problem
centerusing
ofwas
the
embankment
usingcondition.
the with
center
of
the
embankment
the
with
plane
strain
planestrain
straincondition.
problem Numerical
with a symmetry
condition
applied
at the
plane
modeling
enables
the
analysis
of
Numerical
modeling
enablesusing
the analysis
ofplane
embankment
loading
center
of
the
embankment
the
with
strain
condition.
embankment
loading
soilconditions
behavior without
in various
conditions
without
soil
behavior
in
various
resorting
to
simplified
Numerical modeling enables the analysis of embankment loading
resorting
to simplifiedhelps
assumptions.
This helps
understand
the
assumptions.
to understand
the to
behavior
of the
soil
behavior inThis
various conditions
without resorting
to simplified
behavior
of the and
displacement
and
stresses
inand
thethe
subsoil
and
thelateral
piles,
displacement
stresses
in
the
subsoil
piles,
total
assumptions. This helps to understand the behavior of the
movement
of and
the stresses
soil,ofaxial
in the
pile
and
thepile
tension
in
total
lateral movement
the
soil,subsoil
axial
forces
the
and
the
displacement
in forces
the
and
thein
piles,
total
lateral
the geogrids.
Thesoil,
method
of analysis,
important
materials
tension
in theofgeogrids.
The
of
important
materials
movement
the
axialmethod
forces
inanalysis,
the pile
and the tension
in
involved
theconstruction
construction
GRPE
system
are
in
involved
inin the
GRPE
systemimportant
are described
described
in the
the
the
geogrids.
The methodofofof
analysis,
materials
following
section.
following
involved section.
in the construction of GRPE system are described in the
following section.
4.1 Foundation Soils
4.1 Foundation Soils
4.1 Foundation Soils
Soft peaty clay and organic clay was modeled using soft soil model
Soft
peaty
clay and
organicinclay
modeled
using soft
model
which
is readily
available
thewas
software
program.
It issoil
based
on
Soft
peaty
clay and
organic
clay
was
modeled
using
soft
soil
model
which
is
readily
available
in
the
software
program.
It
is
based
on
the
the
Cam-Clay
theory
and
required
parameters
other
than
shear
which is readily
in the
softwareother
program. It
is based
on
Cam-Clay
theory available
and required
parameters
shear
strength
strength
parameter
c' friction
angle than
(')
and
dilatancy
the
Cam-Clay
theory(cohesion,
and required
parameters
other
than
shear
parameter
(cohesion,
c frictioncompression
angle () and
dilatancy
angle
())
angle ())
are modified
index
modified
strength
parameter
(cohesion, c' friction angle
(')(*),
and dilatancy
are
modified
compression
index
(*),
modified
recompression
index
.
The
relationship
recompression
index
(*)
and
initial
void
ratio,e
angle ()) are modified compression indexo (*), modified
of *
* with
consolidation
test*results
as
(*)
andand
initial
void laboratory
ratio,e
. The
relationship
and
*arewith
o
relationship
recompression
index
(*) and
initial
void ratio,eofo. The
follows.
laboratory
consolidation
test
results
are
as
follows.
of * and * with laboratory consolidation test results are as
follows.
(1)
(1)
Clayey
mat was
was modeled
modeled
Clayey sand,
sand, bedrock,
bedrock, embankment
embankment and
and gravel
gravel mat
assuming
elastic-perfectly
plastic
behavior
which was
modeled
assuminglinear
linear
elastic-perfectly
plastic
behavior
which
was
Clayey sand, bedrock, embankment and gravel mat was modeled
using
Mohrusing
Coulomb
model.
Relevant
soilRelevant
parameters
are
tabulated
modeled
Mohr
Coulomb
model.
soil
parameters
assuming linear elastic-perfectly plastic behavior which was
are
tabulated
inMohr
TableCoulomb
3.and
The
foundation
andwere
embankment
soil
inmodeled
Table
3. The
embankment
soil
modeled
using
usingfoundation
model. Relevant
soil
parameters
were
modeled
using 711 triangular elements.
711
triangular
elements.
are tabulated in Table 3. The foundation and embankment soil
were modeled using 711 triangular elements.
61
61
kN/m
10.3
16
sat
kN/m kN/m
10.3 10.3
16
kN/m
3
14
dry
3
kN/m kN/m
3
14
m/Day
1.5
0.864
sat
dry
x
Horizontal
Permeability
Horizontal
Permeability
Vertical Permeability
dry
Vertical
Permeability
Vertical
Permeability
Young's Modulus
x
m/Daym/Day
1.5
m/Day
1.5
y
m/Daym/Day
1.5
MN/m
10
Young's
Modulus
Young's
Modulus
Poissons Ratio
MN/m
MN/m
kN/m
Poissons
Poissons
Ratio Ratio
Cohesion
Cohesion
Cohesion
Friction
Angle
1.5
10
0.4
0.4
Compression
Compression
index index
Swell
Index
Swell Index
Swell Index
22
22
0.009
22
40
4200 4200
0.2
o
kN/m
5
kN/m
20 5
30 5
o
- o
20 - 30
1.2520
- - 0.11.25 1.25
0.1 0.1
Friction
Angle
Friction
Angle
Compression
index
14
22
20
22
20
20
18
20
20
20
20
18
20
20
8640
1.5 0.864 0.864 0.009 0.009
0.086 0.086 8640 8640
0.864
0.009
0.086
8640
10
0.4
5
22
16
1000
451000
30 - 45
-
0.2
45
18
0.086
30
0.2
0.35 0.35
30 20
- 30
-
30
20
40
30 -
175
175
0.2
0.2
40
40
436.8 436.8
600
Table 5-Properties
of Geogrids
Table 5-Properties
of Geogrids
Allowable
strain,
/% T /kNm 6
Tensile
strength,
Tensile strength, T /kNm
600
EA
Allowable
Allowable
strain, strain,
/%
EA
EA
/%
252.8 252.8
1000
6
600
6
1000 1000
Figure4.4.Variation
Variationof
ofconsolidation
consolidation settlement
settlement with
thickness
Figure
withpeat
peat
thickness
andembankment
embankment height
height (Karunarathna,
and
(Karunarathna,2007)
2007)
4. Variation
of consolidation
settlement
withthickness
peat thickness
Figure Figure
4. Variation
of consolidation
settlement
with peat
and
embankment
height
(Karunarathna,
2007)
and embankment height (Karunarathna, 2007)
62
62
62
rd
3Geotechnical
Proff 18-02-2015
Journal Vol. 6
No. 1 2014
4.4
4.4 Analysis
Analysis2-2-Analysis
Analysisof
ofGRPE
GRPE
The
GRPE
analyzed,
is
Theschematic
schematicdiagram
diagramofofthethe
GRPEsystem,
system,which
whichwas
was
analyzed,
presented
in
Figure
6.
The
main
components
of
GRPE
and
relevant
is presented in Figure 6. The main components of GRPE and
material
are given inare
that
Figure.
relevantproperties
material properties
given
in that Figure.
spacing
fromfrom
the bridge.
As mentioned
above, stageabove,
construction
spacingaway
away
the bridge.
As mentioned
stage
procedure
was procedure
used in thewas
analysis
simulate
actual
construction
usedininorder
the to
analysis
in the
order
to
construction
simulate theprocess.
actual construction process.
63
4.5 Results
Resultsof
ofthe
theAnalysis
Analysis
4.5
Table
the
predicted
settlement
each
Table6Results
6gives
gives
the
predicted
settlementafter
aftercompletion
completionof of
each
4.5
Results
of
of the
the
Analysis
Analysis
construction
phase.The
predicted
maximum
about
construction
phase.The
predicted
maximum
settlement
isisofabout
20
Table
6 gives
gives
the
the predicted
predicted
settlement
settlement
after
aftersettlement
completion
completion
of
each
each
20construction
mm
the
bridge
andmm
31away
mm
awaysettlement
from
the is
bridge.
mm
nearnear
the phase.The
bridge
andpredicted
31
from
the
bridge.
Settlement
construction
phase.The
predicted
maximum
maximum
settlement
is
about
about
Settlement
after
three
years
after31
completing
the
construction
of be
aftermm
three
years
after
completing
the
construction
of the
GRPE
can
20
near
near
the
the
bridge
bridge
and
and
31
mm
mm
away
away
from
from
the bridge.
bridge.
GRPE
can
be
estimated
using
stage
construction
option
in
PLAXIS.
estimated
using
stage
construction
option
in
PLAXIS.
Accordingly,
Settlement
Settlement after
after three
three years
years after
aftercompleting
completingthe
theconstruction
constructionofof
Accordingly,
the of
construction
of
the only
embankment,
only
4
after the
the embankment,
4option
mm of
GRPE
canconstruction
be
beafter
estimated
estimated
using
using
stage
stageconstruction
construction
option
ininsettlement
PLAXIS.
PLAXIS.
mm
of
settlement
will
occur
in
three
year
period
near
the
bridge
will
occur inafter
threethe
yearconstruction
period nearof
thethe
bridge
approach only
and
Accordingly,
Accordingly,
after
the
construction
of
the
embankment,
embankment,
onlyonly
44
approach
andfrom
onlythe
7mm
away
from
theyear
bridge
approach.
7mmofaway
bridge
approach.
mm
settlement
settlement
will
will
occur
occur
in
inthree
three
year
period
period
near
nearthe
thebridge
bridge
Table
6 - Settlement
afteraway
each
construction
stage
approach
and
and only
only 7mm
7mm
awayfrom
fromthe
thebridge
bridge
approach.
approach.
Settlement after
Table 6 -- Settlement
Settlement
aftereach
eachconstruction
construction
constructionstage
stage
stage
Settlement of the
Time
top of the
Settlement
Settlementofofthe
the
Interval of
Time
Time
embankment
top
topofofthe
the
Stage
Load application
load
Interval
Intervalofof
2.5embankment
m
3.0 m
embankment
Stage
Load
Load application
application application
load
load
pile
pile
2.5
2.5mm
3.0
3.0mm
/(Days)
application
application spacing
spacing
pile
pile
pile
pile
/(Days)
/(Days)
Initial
Existing ground +
spacing
spacing spacing
spacing
stage
piles
+ ++
Initial Driven
Existing
Existing
ground
ground
Geogrid + Gravel
0
0
0
stage
Driven
Driven piles
piles ++
Mat (1.2 m
Geogrid
Geogrid ++ Gravel
Gravel
00
00
00
Thick)
Mat
Mat (1.2
(1.2 m
m
Initial
stage
Thick)
Thick)
Stage
+Embankment(
21
2
2
Initial
Initial stage
stage
1
Stage 1.5m)
+Embankment(
+Embankment(
21
21
22
22
1
Stage
1.5m)
1.5m)
Stage
1+Embankment (
21
5
6
Stage
Stage
2
Stage 1.5 m)
1+Embankment
1+Embankment((
21
21
55
66
2
Stage
1.5
1.5 m)
m)
Stage
2+Embankment (
21
10
15
Stage
Stage
3
Stage 1.5 m)
2+Embankment
2+Embankment((
21
21
10
10
1515
3
1.5
1.5 m)
m)
Stage
4
Stage
Stage
4Stage
4
5
Stage
Stage
55
Stage
6 Stage
Stage
66
Stage
7 Stage
Stage
77
Stage
3+Embankment (
Stage
Stage
0.8 m)
3+Embankment
3+Embankment
( (
0.8
0.8m)m)
Stage
4+ Open to
traffic
Stage
Stage4+4+
Open
Open
to to
traffic
traffic
Stage 5+ Open to
traffic
Stage
Stage5+5+
Open
Open
to to
traffic
traffic
Stage 6+ Open to
traffic
Stage
Stage6+6+
Open
Open
to to
traffic
traffic
21
16
24
2121
1616
24 24
21
20
30
2121
2020
30 30
200
20
31
200
200
2020
31 31
800
20
31
800
800
2020
31 31
4.7
Stresses
the
Deformation
in1.2
Geogrid
of
layersand
ofplatform
biaxial
geogridsofwith
strength
of 600
kPa. Theof
Thethree
load
transfer
consists
m
gravel mat
comprising
The
load
transfer
platform
consists
of
1.2
m
gravel
mat
comprising
mobile
tensile
strength
of
geogrids
placed
on
3m
pile
spacing
is
three layers of biaxial geogrids with strength of 600 kPa. The mobile
of
threestrength
biaxial
geogrids
with
strength
of 600
The
shown
inlayers
Figureof
It indicates
more
strength
hasin
tensile
of11.
geogrids
placedthat
on 3m
piletensile
spacing
is kPa.
shown
mobile
tensile
strength
of more
geogrids
pile
is
been
in the geogrids
attensile
theplaced
edge
ofon
the3m
pile.
Figuremobilized
11.
It indicates
that
strength
has
beenspacing
mobilized
shown
in
Figure
11.
It
indicates
that
more
tensile
strength
has
in the geogrids at the edge of the pile.
been mobilized in the geogrids at the edge of the pile.
settlement
theessential
embankment
fill differential
which is settlement
150 mm.
treatment is under
therefore
to limit the
The
proposed
system for ground
construction
of bridge
approaches
Settlement
ofGPRE
the
untreated
is large
and soft
ground
in the
approach
embankment.
reduces
the istotal
settlement
of thetoembankment;
more importantly,
treatment
therefore
essential
limit the differential
settlement
the
differential
settlement
between the pile and foundation soil is
in
the
approachGPRE
embankment.
The
proposed
construction
of bridge
approaches
very
small
and hence system
upwardfor
lunges,
which may
be created
due to
reduces
the
total
settlement
of
the
embankment;
the settlement between the bridge deck and the embankment,more
will
The proposedthe
GPRE system forsettlement
construction
of bridgethe
approaches
between
beimportantly,
eliminated. The differential
conceptual design or preliminary
designpile
for and
the
reduces
the total
settlement
of the
embankment;
more
foundation
is veryout
small
andon
hence
upward
lunges,
may
situation
wassoil
carried
based
published
data
and which
guidelines.
importantly,
thetodifferential
settlement
between
the deck
pile and
be created
due
settlement
the FE
bridge
Then
the system
wastheanalyzed
withbetween
a validated
model and
it
foundation
soil is very
small
and hence upward
lunges, which
may
the
embankment,
will
be
eliminated.
The
conceptual
design
was found that the specified design criteria were met. The results or
of
be
created due
to the
between
the bridge
deck and
preliminary
design
for settlement
the situation
was carried
out based
on
the settlement monitoring carried out during and after construction
the
embankment,
will
be eliminated.
The
conceptual
designwith
or
published
data
and
guidelines.
Then
the
system
was
analyzed
of bridge approach embankment indicates that the settlement
preliminary
design
forand
theit situation
was
out based
on
a validated FE
model
was found
thatcarried
the specified
design
performance of bridge approach is satisfactory and confirms to the
published
data met.
and guidelines.
Then
was analyzed
with
criteria
were
The results
ofthe
thesystem
settlement
monitoring
design
criteria
a validated
modeland
andafter
it was
found that the
specified
design
carried
out FE
during
construction
of bridge
approach
criteria were indicates
met. The
of the settlement
monitoring
embankment
thatresults
the settlement
performance
of bridge
carried
and after
approachoutis during
satisfactory
and construction
confirms to of
thebridge
designapproach
criteria
embankment indicates that the settlement performance of bridge
approach is satisfactory and confirms to the design criteria
65
65
Geotechnical
Journal
Vol.
No.
1 2014
Geotechnical
Journal
Vol.
6 6No.
1 2014
Geotechnical
Journal
Vol. 6Vol.
No.61 No.
20141 2014
68
Geotechnical
Journal
2 DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBANKMENT AND
DESCRIPTION OF
OF THE
THE EMBANKMENT
EMBANKMENT AND
AND
INSTRUMENTATION
2 2 DESCRIPTION
INSTRUMENTATION
INSTRUMENTATION
2 6-m-high
DESCRIPTION
OF embankment
THE EMBANKMENT
A
reinforced earth
was constructedAND
and
6-m-high
reinforcedearth
earthembankment
embankmentwas
wasconstructed
constructedand
and
INSTRUMENTATION
A A6-m-high
reinforced
designed
by the
Department of Highways
(DOHs) of
Thailand near
designed
by
the
Department
of
Highways
(DOHs)
of
Thailand
near
designed
by
of Highways
(DOHs)
of
Thailand
near
Highway
No.the
11Department
(Phitsanulok-Uttaradit)
in was
Phitsanulok
Province
A Highway
6-m-high
reinforced
earth
embankment
constructed
and in
No.
(Phitsanulok-Uttaradit)
in
Phitsanulok
Province
Highway
No.
1111
(Phitsanulok-Uttaradit)
in(DOHs)
Phitsanulok
Province
in
in
central
Thailand.
The
test
embankment
was
18
m
long
and
15
designed
by
the
Department
of
Highways
of
Thailand
near
central
Thailand.
The
test
embankment
was
18
m
long
and
15m
central
Thailand.
The
test
embankment
was
18
m
long
and
15
mm
wide
at
the
top.
On
one
side,
the
reinforced
steep
slope
(RSS)
was
Highway
No.
11 (Phitsanulok-Uttaradit)
in Phitsanulok
Province
in
wide
at
the
top.
On
one
side,
the
reinforced
steep
slope
(RSS)
was
wide
at Thailand.
the top.
On
onetest
side,
the70reinforced
steep
slope
(RSS)
constructed
with
aThe
face
sloping
degrees
the
horizontal
and
central
embankment
wasfrom
18
m
long
and 15was
m
constructed
with
a
face
sloping
70
degrees
from
the
horizontal
and
constructed
with
a face
sloping
70reinforced
degrees
from
the
horizontal
and
wide
at theoftop.
On
one
side,
the
steep
slope
(RSS) was
consisting
folded
soil
bags.
On
the
other
side,
the
mechanically
consisting
of
folded
soil
bags.
On
the
other
side,
the
mechanically
consisting earth
ofwith
folded
soil
bags. was
On
the
otherfrom
side,
the
mechanically
constructed
awall
face
sloping
70was
degrees
the
horizontal
and
stabilised
(MSEW)
installed
with
vertical
concrete
stabilisedearth
earthwall
(MSEW)
installed
with
vertical
concrete
stabilised
wall
(MSEW)
was
installed
with
vertical
concrete
consisting
of
folded
soil
bags.
On
the
other
side,
the
mechanically
panels
as
the
facing.
Three
types
of
polymeric
geogrids
reinforcement
panels as as thethe facing.
facing. Three
Three types
types ofof polymeric
polymeric geogrids
geogrids
panels
stabilised
earthinwall
installed
with vertical
concrete
were
installed
the (MSEW)
reinforced
steep
slope
(RSS)
facing,slope
and (RSS)
two
reinforcement
were
installedinwas
in
the
reinforced
steep
reinforcement
were
installed
the
reinforced
steep
slope
(RSS)
panels
the
facing.of metallic
Threewere
types
of polymeric
geogrids
types
of as
metallic
reinforcement
installed
inwere
the mechanically
facing,
and
two
types
reinforcement
installed
facing,
and twowere
typesinstalled
of metallic
reinforcement
were
in in
thethe
reinforcement
in
the (MSEW)
reinforced
steepinstalled
slope
(RSS)
stabilised
earth wall
(MSEW)
facing.
The threefacing.
types
of
polymeric
mechanically
stabilised
earth
wall
The
three
types
mechanically
stabilised
wall (MSEW) facing.
three in
types
facing,
andreinforcement
two
types
ofearth
metallic
wereThe
installed
the
geogrid
were reinforcement
polyester
(PET),
high-density
ofpolymeric
polymeric
geogrid
reinforcement
werepolyester
polyester
(PET),
highof
geogrid
reinforcement
were
(PET),
highmechanically
stabilised
earth
wall
(MSEW)
facing.
The
three
types
densitypolyethylene
polyethylene
(HDPE)
andpolypropylene
polypropylene
(PP).The
Thetwo
two
polyethylene
(HDPE) (HDPE)
and
polypropylene
(PP). The(PP).
two
types
of
density
and
oftypes
polymeric
geogrid
reinforcement
were
polyester
(PET),
highof
metallic
reinforcement
were
steel
wire
grids
(SWG)
and
metallic
reinforcement
were steelwere
wire
grids
(SWG)
and
metallic
types
of
metallic
reinforcement
steel
wire
grids
(SWG)
and
density
polyethylene
(HDPE)
andwas
polypropylene
(PP).
The
two
metallic
strips
(MS).
The
vertical
spacing
was
0.5
m
and
the
length
strips
(MS).
The
vertical
spacing
0.5
m
and
the
length
of
the
metallic
(MS). The verticalwere
spacing
was
0.5grids
m and(SWG)
the length
types
of strips
metallic
steel
wire
and
reinforcement
was
5 m.Thegrid
spacing
MSEW
wall
was
reinforcement
was reinforcement
5 m.Thegrid
spacingspacing
for
MSEW
wall
waswall
0.375m
ofof
thethe
reinforcement
was
5vertical
m.Thegrid
forfor
MSEW
was
metallic
strips
(MS).
The
spacing
was
0.5
m
and
the length
0.375m
for
the
first
layer
of
reinforcement
and
0.5m
for
the
for
the first
layer
of
reinforcement
and 0.5m for the
remaining
layer.
0.375m
for
the
first
layer
of
reinforcement
and
0.5m
for
the
ofremaining
the reinforcement
was 5 m.Thegrid
spacing for MSEW
wall was
layer.
Extensive
field
instrumentation
program
was
Extensive
field
instrumentation
program
was
established
to
monitor
remaining
Extensive
field
instrumentation
program
was
0.375m
forlayer.
the monitor
first
layer
of
reinforcement
and
0.5m
forfor
thethe
established
both
thebehavior
behavior
andperformance
performance
both
the behavior
andboth
performance
forand
the
embankment/wall,
established
to tomonitor
the
for was
the
remaining
layer.
Extensive
field
instrumentation
program
embankment/wall,
geogrid
reinforcement
and
steel
reinforcement
geogrid
reinforcement
and
steel
reinforcement
and
subsoil
condition.
embankment/wall,
geogrid
reinforcement
and
steel
reinforcement
established
to condition.
monitor both
the instrumentation
behavior and performance
for
the to
and
subsoil
Subsoil
was
installed
prior
Subsoil
instrumentation
was
installed
prior to
the
construction
of
the
and
subsoil
condition.
Subsoil
instrumentation
was
installed
prior
to
embankment/wall,
geogrid
reinforcement
and
steel
reinforcement
the
construction
of
the
embankment/wall.
Monitoring
work
was
embankment/wall.
work was carried
outinstalled
duringwork
and
after
the
construction
ofMonitoring
the
embankment/wall.
Monitoring
was
and
subsoil
condition.
Subsoil
instrumentation
was
prior
to
carried
out
during
and
after
the
construction
completion.
The
carried
out during
and embankment/wall.
afterThe
themonitoring
construction
completion.
The
the
construction
completion.
instruments
installed
the
construction
of the
Monitoring
work
was
monitoring
instruments
installed
to
check
the
vertical
and
horizontal
monitoring
instruments
installed
to
check
the
vertical
and
horizontal
to
check
the
vertical
and
horizontal
displacements,
stresses,
excess
carried
out during
and after
construction
completion.
Thethe
displacements,
stresses,
excessthe
pore
waterpressures,
pressures,
depthto to
displacements,
stresses,
excess
water
depth
pore
water pressures,
depth
to thepore
groundwater
table and
strains
in the
monitoring
instruments
installed
to
check
the vertical
and
horizontal
groundwater
table
and
strains
in
the
reinforcing
material
included
groundwater
table and
strains
inpore
the water
reinforcing
material
included
reinforcing
material
included
inclinometers,
settlement
plates,
displacements,
excess
pressures,
depth
tototal
the
inclinometers,stresses,
settlement
plates,
totalpressure
pressure
cells,
standpipe
inclinometers,
settlement
plates,
total
cells,
standpipe
pressure
cells,
standpipe
piezometers,
vibrating-wire
strain
gauges
groundwater
table
and
strains
in
the
reinforcing
material
included
piezometers,vibrating-wire
vibrating-wirestrain
straingauges
gaugesand
andfibre
fibreoptic
opticstrain
strain
piezometers,
and
fibre optic
strain
gauges.plates,
The
instruments
include
5 inclinometers,
inclinometers,
settlement
total
pressure
cells,
standpipe
gauges.
Theinstruments
instruments
include
5inclinometers,
inclinometers,
45settlement
settlement
gauges.
The
include
5
45
45
settlement
plates,
6 total
pressure
cells, 5 and
standpipe
piezometers,
vibrating-wire
strain
gauges
fibre piezometers,
optic
strain
plates,
6total
total
pressure
cells,
5standpipe
standpipe
piezometers,
2reference
reference
6 The
pressure
cells,
piezometers,
2 settlement
gauges.
instruments
include
5 inclinometers,
2plates,
reference
benchmarks
and
55 instrument
houses.
In 45
addition,
two
benchmarks
and
5
instrument
houses.
In
addition,
two
observation
benchmarks
and
5 were
instrument
In addition,
two observation
plates,
6were
total
pressure
cells,
5houses.
standpipe
piezometers,
2depth
reference
observation
wells
installed
tothe
measure
the fluctuation
in tothethe
wells
installed
to
measure
fluctuation
in
the
wells
were
to measure
the fluctuation
in the
depth
to the
benchmarks
and
5 instrument
houses.
Incross
addition,
two
observation
depth
to theinstalled
groundwater
The
and section
cross
section
of
the
groundwater
table.
Thetable.
plan
andplan
of
MSE
groundwater
table.
The
plan
and
cross
section
ofdepth
thethetoMSE
wells
were
installed
to
measure
the
fluctuation
in
the
the
MSE
wall/embankment
withthe
thelocation
location monitoring instruments
areare
wall/embankment
with
instruments
wall/embankment
with
the
location
monitoring
instruments
are
groundwater
table.
The
plan and cross section of the MSE
shown
in in
Figs.
1 and
2,
respectively.
shown
Figs.
1 and
respectively.
shown
in Figs.
1 and
2, 2,
respectively.
wall/embankment
with
the location monitoring instruments are
shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively.
Figure
1.Plan
MSE
wall/embankment.
Figure
1.Plan
ofof
MSE
wall/embankment.
Figure 1.Plan of MSE wall/embankment.
Figure
Soil
profile
SPT
value
(considering
BH
1-4)
Figure
3. 3.
Soil
profile
SPT
value
(considering
BH
1-4)
Figure 3. Soil profile SPT value (considering BH 1-4)
4 COMPONENETS OF MSE WALL/EMBANKMENT
COMPONENETS
OF MSE WALL/EMBANKMENT
4 4 Backfill
COMPONENETS
4.1
Properties OF MSE WALL/EMBANKMENT
Backfill
Properties OF MSE WALL/EMBANKMENT
44.14.1
COMPONENETS
Backfill
The
backfill Properties
materials used in this embankment consisted of 50%
backfill
materials
usedin silty
inthis
this
embankment
consisted
of50%
50%
lateritic
soil Properties
mixed
withused
50%
sand
(by volume).
The of
backfill
4.1The
Backfill
The
backfill
materials
embankment
consisted
lateritic
soil
mixed
with
50%
silty
sand
(by
volume).
The
backfill
material
was
classified
as
poorly
graded
sand
(SP).
It
had
an
optimum
lateritic
soil mixed
withused
50%insilty
(by volume).
The of
backfill
The
backfill
materials
this sand
embankment
consisted
50%an
material
was
classified
poorly
graded
sand
(SP).It
Ithad
had
moisture
content
of 7.8%,asaaspoorly
maximum
dry unit
weight
19.62
kN/
material
was
classified
graded
sand
(SP).
an
lateritic
soil
mixed
with
50%
silty
sand
(by
volume).
The
backfill
optimum
moisture
content
of
7.8%,
a
maximum
dry
unit
weight
m3.
A
friction
angle
of
42
degrees
and
a
cohesion
of
80
kPa
were
optimum
moisture
content
of
7.8%,
a
maximum
dry
unit
weight
material
was classified
asangle
poorly
graded
sandand(SP).
It had ofan80
19.62
kN/m3.
A
friction
degrees
a cohesion
measured
in aAdirect
shear
test.
Effective
friction
angles
ofof32.8
19.62
kN/m3.
friction
angle
ofof
4242
degrees
and adry
cohesion
80
optimum
moisture
content
of 7.8%,
atest.
maximum
unit angles
weight
kPa
were
measured
in
a
direct
shear
Effective
friction
degrees
and
37
degrees
and
effective
cohesions
of
0
and
20
kPa
were
kPa
were
measured
in
a
direct
shear
test.
Effective
friction
angles
ofof
19.62
kN/m3.
A
friction
angle
of
42
degrees
and
a
cohesion
of
80
32.8
degrees
and
37
degrees
and
effective
cohesions
of
0
and
20
kPa
measured
in
two
different
consolidated
undrained
(CU)
triaxial
tests.
32.8 were
degrees
and 37 in
degrees
and
effective
cohesionsfriction
of 0 and
20 kPa
kPa
measured
a direct
shear
test. Effective
angles
of
were
measured
in
two
different
consolidated
undrained
(CU)
triaxial
The
properties
of
the
backfill
material
are
tabulated
in
Table
1.
were
measured
in
two
different
consolidated
undrained
(CU)
triaxial
32.8
degrees
and 37 degrees
and
effective
cohesions
of 0 and
20
kPa1.
tests.
The
properties
of
backfill
material
are
tabulated
Table
tests.
The
properties
ofdifferent
thethe
backfill
material
are
tabulated
in in
Table
1.
were measured
in two
consolidated
undrained
(CU)
triaxial
Table
1.
Properties
of
backfill
material
tests.
The
properties
of
the
backfill
material
are
tabulated
in
Table
1.
Table 1. Properties of backfill material
=material
20.8%,
PL=17.3%,
PI=3.5%.
Atterberg
Limit
Table
1. Properties
of backfill
LLLL
= 20.8%,
PL=17.3%,
PI=3.5%.
Atterberg
Limit
Test
Test
Atterberg
Limit LL = 20.8%, PL=17.3%, PI=3.5%.
Sample
No.
Sieve
Analysis
Test Sample
Test
No.
11
Sieve
Analysis
Test
Sieve Analysis Test
6868
68
Percent
finer
(#200
sieve)
= 0.94%
Sample
No.
1(#200
Percent
finer
sieve)
= 0.94%
CuCu
=
40,
Cc
=
0.34
=
40, Ccfiner
= 0.34
Percent
(#200 sieve) = 0.94% Cu
= 40, Cc = 0.34
GeotechnicalJournal
JournalVol.
Vol.66 No.
No.112014
2014
Geotechnical
rdGeotechnical Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 2014
3 Proff 18-02-2015
Unified
Unified
Classification
Classification
Unified
Classification
AASHTO
AASHTO
Unified
Classification
Classification
AASHTO
Classification
Classification
Compaction
Test
Compaction
AASHTO Test
Compaction Test
Classification
SampleNo.
No.22
Sample
Sample
No. 2(#200 sieve) = 0.14% Cu
Percentfiner
finer
Percent
(#200 sieve) = 0.14% Cu
42.86,Cc
Cc== 0.55
0.55
==
42.86,
Percent
finer
Sample
No.
2 (#200 sieve) = 0.14% Cu
=
42.86,
Cc
=
0.55(SP)
Poorlygraded
gradedsand
sand
Poorly
(SP)
Percent finer (#200
sieve) = 0.14% Cu
sand (SP)
=Poorly
42.86,graded
Cc = 0.55
A-2-4(0)
A-2-4(0)
Poorly graded sand (SP)
A-2-4(0)
Maximum
drydensity
density((,d,max) )==19.62
19.62
Maximum
dry
d max
A-2-4(0)
3
3
kN/m
kN/m
Maximum dry density ( , ) = 19.62
d max
cohesion
= 80
Test
No.angle
Friction
angle == 32.8
32.8
Friction
=kPa
42 degrees
Test
No.
Friction
angle
1
degrees
1cohesion
degrees
Test No.= 80
Friction
angle
=
32.8
kPa
1
degrees
cohesion==00kPa
kPa
Test No. cohesion
Friction angle = 32.8
cohesion
=
0
kPa = 37
No. Friction
Friction angle
angle
1Test No.
degrees
Test
= 37
2
degrees
2 Test No. degrees
Friction = 0angle
cohesion
kPa = 37
2
degrees = 20 kPa
cohesion
kPa = 37
Test No. cohesion
Friction = 20
angle
cohesion
=
20
kPa
2
degrees
cohesion = 20 kPa
Figure4.Reinforcing
4.Reinforcingmaterials.
materials.
Figure
Figure 4.Reinforcing materials.
Figure 4.Reinforcing materials.
4.2 Reinforcements
4.2Reinforcements
Reinforcements
4.2
Two
types of reinforcement, namely polymeric and metallic
4.2
TwoReinforcements
types ofofwere
reinforcement,
namely
polymeric
and metallic
metallic
Two
types
reinforcement,
namely
polymeric
and
reinforcement,
used in the
reinforced
embankment.
The
reinforcement,
were
used inin the
the
reinforced
embankment.
The
reinforcement,
were
used
reinforced
embankment.
The
Two
types
of
reinforcement,
namely
polymeric
and
metallic
polymeric
reinforcement types used were high-density polyethylene
4.2
Reinforcements
polymeric
reinforcement
types
used
were
high-density
polyethylene
polymeric
reinforcement
typesin
used
were
high-density
polyethylene
reinforcement,
were used
thepolyester
reinforced
embankment.
The
(HDPE),
polypropylene
(PP)
and
(PET).
metallic
(HDPE),
polypropylene
(PP)
and
polyester
(PET).The
The
metallic
Two
types
of reinforcement,
namely
polymeric
and
metallic
(HDPE),
polypropylene
(PP)
and
polyester
(PET).
The
metallic
polymeric
reinforcement
types
used
were(MS)
high-density
polyethylene
reinforcement
consisted
of
metallic
strips
and
steel
wire
grids
reinforcement
consisted
metallic
strips
(MS)and
and
steel
wire
grids
reinforcement,
were used
in and
thestrips
reinforced
embankment.
The
reinforcement
consisted
ofof
metallic
(MS)
steel
grids
(HDPE),
polypropylene
(PP)
polyester
(PET).
The
metallic
(SWG).
The
properties
ofof
the
reinforcement
are
tabulated
inwire
Table
2.2.
(SWG).
The
properties
the
reinforcement
are
tabulated
in
Table
polymeric
reinforcement
types
used
were
high-density
polyethylene
(SWG).
The
properties
of
the
reinforcement
are
tabulated
in
Table
2.
reinforcement
consisted
of
metallic
strips
(MS)
and
steel
wire
grids
The
reinforcing
materials
used
ininthe
embankment
are
shown
ininFig.
The
reinforcing
materials
used
the
embankment
are
shown
Fig.
(HDPE),
polypropylene
(PP)
and
polyesterare(PET).
Thein metallic
The
reinforcing
materialsofused
the embankment
are shown
in
Fig.2.
(SWG).
The
properties
the in
reinforcement
tabulated
Table
4.reinforcement
The
MSEW
facing
withwith
metallic
reinforcement
the
RSS
facing
The
MSEW
facing
metallic
reinforcement
and
the
RSS
consisted
of
metallic
(MS) and
andare
steel
wire
grids
4.4.
The
MSEW
facing
with
metallic
reinforcement
and
the
RSS
The
reinforcing
materials
used
in thestrips
embankment
shown
in
Fig.
with
polymeric
reinforcement
are
shown
in
Fig.
5.
facing
with
polymeric
reinforcement
are
shown
in
Fig.
5.
(SWG).
The
properties
ofwith
the reinforcement
areintabulated
Table
2.
facing
with
polymeric
reinforcement
are shown
Fig. 5.andin the
4. The
MSEW
facing
metallic
reinforcement
RSS
The
reinforcing
materials
used in the embankment
are shown
in Fig.
facing
with polymeric
reinforcement
are shown in Fig.
5.
4. The MSEW facing with metallic reinforcement and the RSS
Table
Properties
reinforcing
material
facing2.2.
with
polymeric
reinforcement
are shown in Fig. 5.
Table
Properties
ofofreinforcing
material
Table
2.
Properties
of
reinforcing
material
Material
Tensile Thickness
Thickness Normal
Normal
Type
Material
Tensile
Type
Name
Strength
(mm)
Stiffness,
Name
Strength
(mm)
Stiffness,
Material
Tensile
Thickness
Normal
Type
Table 2. Properties(kN/m)
of reinforcing material EA
(kN/m)
EA
Name
Strength (mm)
Stiffness,
(kN/m)
Material
Tensile
Thickness (kN/m)
Normal
Type
(kN/m)
EA
Name
Strength
(mm)
Stiffness,
(kN/m)
277.6
4.00
88,000
Metallic Strip
Strip 277.6
88,000
Metallic
-(kN/m) 4.00
EA
(MS)
(MS)
4.00
88,000
Metallic Strip 277.6
(kN/m)
(MS)
128.1
6.00
35,000
Steel
Wire 128.1
6.00
35,000
Steel
Wire
- -4.00
88,000
Metallic
Strip 277.6
Grid
(SWG)
Grid
(SWG)
128.1
6.00
35,000
Steel
Wire
(MS)
Grid (SWG)
83.6
1.50
925
Polyester
Miragrid
1.50
925
Polyester
Miragrid
128.1
6.00
35,000
Steel
Wire 83.6
(PET)
GX80/30
(PET)
GX80/30
83.6
1.50
925
Polyester
Miragrid
Grid (SWG)
(PET)
GX80/30
91.9
1.45
1,360
Polypropylene
Secugrid
91.9
1.45
1,360
Polypropylene
Secugrid
83.6
1.50
925
Polyester
Miragrid
(PP)
80/80
Q1
1.45
1,360
(PP)
80/80
Q1
Polypropylene 91.9
Secugrid
Plate
Model
4.4Interface
InterfaceShear
ShearStrength
Strength
(PET)
GX80/30
4.4
(PP)
80/80
Q1
85.8
1.91
1,320
High-Density
TT
090
85.8
1.91
1,320
4.4 Interface
Shear
Strength
High-Density
TT
090
The
interaction
between
the backfill
backfill soil
soil and
and the
the reinforcing
reinforcing
91.9
1.45
1,360
Polypropylene
Secugrid
The
interaction
between
the
Polyethylene
SAMP
Polyethylene
SAMP
85.8
1.91
1,320
High-Density
TT 090
materials,
namely,
the
metallic
strips
(MS),
steel
wire
grids
(SWG),
4.4
Interface
Shear
Strength
(PP)
80/80
Q1
materials,
namely,
the
metallic
(MS),soil
steeland
wire the
gridsreinforcing
(SWG),
TheInterface
interaction
between
thestrips
backfill
(HDPE)
4.4
Shear
Strength
(HDPE)
Polyethylene
SAMP
polyester
(PET),
polypropylene
(PP)and
and
high-density
polyethylene
polyester
(PET),
polypropylene
(PP)
high-density
polyethylene
materials,
namely,
the
metallic
strips
(MS),
steel
wire
grids
(SWG),
85.8
1.91
1,320
High-Density
TT 090
(HDPE)
The
interaction
between
the
soil
and
The
interaction
between
the backfill
backfill
soil
and the
the reinforcing
reinforcing
polyester
(PET),
polypropylene
(PP)
and
high-density
polyethylene
69materials, namely, the metallic strips (MS), steel wire grids (SWG),
Polyethylene
SAMP 69
materials, namely, the metallic strips (MS), steel wire grids (SWG),
(HDPE)
69
polyester
polyester(PET),
(PET),polypropylene
polypropylene(PP)
(PP)and
andhigh-density
high-densitypolyethylene
polyethylene
(HDPE), was assessed by conducting large-scale direct shear tests.
69
Friction angle
Cohesion
(kPa)
Rinter
Soil
40
23
1.00
strip
36
23
0.87
Steel
wire
grid (SWG)
40
28
1.00
Miragrid
GX80/30 PET
33
21
0.79
Secugrid
80/80 Q1 PP
35
25
0.83
TT
090
SAMP HDPE
33
24
0.77
Steel
(MS)
100m
perreinforcement
roll) from the factory.
It was cutinby
length
7.0m each and
Geogrid
form delivered
roll
formof(approximately
optical
fiber
with
sensors
was installed
designated
the
100m per
roll)
from
the factory.
It wasatcut
by lengthlocations
of 7.0mofeach
selected
geogrid
at theinstalled
site.
and optical
fiberreinforcement
with sensors was
at designated locations
of the selected geogrid reinforcement at the site.
Steel grid and steel strip with 5.0m length was installed and connected
Steel
grid panel
and steel
strip
with 5.0m
lengthgauges
was installed
to
concrete
facing.
Vibrating
wire strain
were fixedand
to
connected
to concrete
panel facing.
Vibrating
wire strain gauges
steel
reinforcement
at designated
locations
at the site.
were fixed to steel reinforcement at designated locations at the site.
The
(silty
sand)
waswas
spread
at the
The first
firstcourse
courseofofbackfill
backfillmaterial
material
(silty
sand)
spread
at rear
the
of
the
precast
concrete
facing
panel.
Compaction
of
backfill
material
rear of the precast concrete facing panel. Compaction of backfill
to
95% proctor
the backfill
materialmaterial
was carried
out by
material
to 95% density
proctor of
density
of the backfill
was carried
aout
vibratory
compactor.
A small vibratory
was utilizedwas
to
by a vibratory
compactor.
A small compactor
vibratory compactor
carry
outtothecarry
compaction
at narrow
areaatwith
interference
of
utilized
out the work
compaction
work
narrow
area with
the
instruments
installed.
Afterinstalled.
the completion
the compaction
interference
of the
instruments
After theofcompletion
of the
compaction
(1) the
of steel grid reinforcement
work,
(1) thework,
first layer
of first
steel layer
grid reinforcement
was installed was
into
installed and
intoattached
positiontoand
attachedconcrete
to the facing
precastpanel
concrete
position
the precast
by lapfacing
joint
panel by lap(Fig.6).
joint mechanism
(Fig.6).
The lap
mechanism
was
mechanism
The lap joint
mechanism
wasjoint
secured
by inserting
inserting
a 10mmsteel
diameter
deformed
steel
barmesh.
across
the
asecured
10mm by
diameter
deformed
bar across
the lap
fold
Steel
lap
fold
mesh.
Steel
grid
was
installed
horizontally
along
the
wall.
grid was installed horizontally along the wall. The effective length
Thethe
effective
length ofwas
the 5.0m
reinforcements
was 5.0m
afterconnection.
deducting
of
reinforcements
after deducting
for the
for the connection. (2) the first layer of steel strip reinforcement was
(2) the first layer of steel strip reinforcement was installed into
installed into position and attached to the precast concrete facing
position and attached to the precast concrete facing panel by using
panel by using a 12mm diameter galvanized bolt (Fig.7). (3) the first
a 12mm diameter galvanized bolt (Fig.7). (3) the first layer of
layer of geogrid reinforcement was installed into position and turn
geogrid
reinforcement
was installed
intoof
position
and turn
geogrid
up geogrid
reinforcement
at the face
the slope
and up
return
the
reinforcement
the face ofof
the1 slope
andthe
return
the reinforcement
reinforcement at
a minimum
m into
embankment
below thea
minimum
of 1 m intolayer
the embankment
the next reinforcement
next reinforcement
(Fig. 8). Thisbelow
embankment
was required
layer
(Fig.
8). This
was to
required
bag with
grass (Fig.
seed
soil bag
with
grassembankment
seed at the face
retain soil
backfill
materials
at
9).the face to retain backfill materials (Fig. 9).
Preliminary design of the MSE wall was carried out based on the
Preliminary design of the MSE wall was carried out based on the
external and internal stability analysis of the geometry of the wall.
external and internal stability analysis of the geometry of the wall.
Limit equilibrium method of analysis was adopted for the
Limit
equilibrium
of analysis
was adopted
preliminary
preliminary
designmethod
by assuming
the interaction
offor
thethe
reinforcement
design
by
assuming
the
interaction
of
the
reinforcement
the
with the backfill material based on the laboratory test datawith
carried
backfill
material
the laboratory
test data
carried
outvolume)
in AIT.
out in AIT.
Siltybased
sandon
mixed
with lateritic
soil(1
: 1 by
Silty
sand
mixed
with lateritic
: 1 bymaterial.
volume) sourced from
sourced
from
Phitsanulok
is usedsoil(1
as backfill
Phitsanulok is used as backfill material.
The wall height assumed for the preliminary design is 6m with
vertical
Verticalfor
spacing
of5 (five)design
type isof6mreinforcement
The
wallfacing.
height assumed
the preliminary
with vertical
adoptedVertical
is 0.50 m
and horizontal
only steel strip
is 0.50
facing.
spacing
of5 (five)spacing
type offor
reinforcement
adopted
is
m center
to center
of thespacing
0.05 mfor
wide
strip
of reinforcement.
0.50
m and
horizontal
only
steel
strip is 0.50 mPrecast
center
Subsequent course
courseofofbackfill
backfill
material
measuring
of 0.50m
Subsequent
material
measuring
of 0.50m
thick thick
were
concrete
facing
panel
of 1.50m
height,
1.50m width
andconcrete
0.15m
to
center of
the 0.05
m wide
strip of
reinforcement.
Precast
were spread
over
thesurface
plan surface
area covering
the embankment.
2
spread
over
the
plan
area
covering
the
embankment.
Similar
for and
the
thickness
with height,
surface 1.50m
area width
of 2.25
m is used
facing
paneland
of 1.50m
and 0.15m
thickness
Similar compaction
work
was out
carried
outthe
before
next of
course
of
compaction
work was
carried
before
nextthe
course
precast
construction
of the
Concrete
of facing panel
was
30
with
surface area
of wall.
2.25 m2is
usedstrength
for the construction
of the
wall.
precast
concrete
facing
panel
was
installed.
The
procedure
as
concrete facing panel was installed. The procedure as mentioned
MPa.
Concrete strength of facing panel was 30 MPa.
mentioned
above was
until the
full height
of 6.0m was
above
was repeated
untilrepeated
the full height
of 6.0m
was achieved.
achieved.
The internal stability, tension in the reinforcement behind the failure
The
internal
stability, against
tensionthe
in the
reinforcement
behind
the failure
surface
was checked
lateral
internal earth
pressures.
The
During
of the
the embankment,
embankment, field
field density
test at
at
During the
the construction
construction of
density test
surface
was checked
the lateral
internal earth
lateral earth
pressure against
coefficient
was assumed
to bepressures.
uniform
various
selected
places
were
carried
out
using
sand
cone
replacement
various selected places were carried out using sand cone
The
lateral the
earth
pressure
to be to
uniform
throughout
height
of thecoefficient
wall at the was
valueassumed
corresponding
the at
method
to ensure
compaction
wascompaction
carried out to
replacement
method
to ensure
wasminimum
carried of
out95%
to
throughout
the(Kheight
of
the
wall
at
the
value
corresponding
to
).
The
effects
of
compaction
were
ignored
in
this
rest condition
o
standard
minimumproctor
of 95%density.
standard proctor density.
preliminary
design. The
pullout ofresistance
inclusive
of the
the
at rest condition
(Ko). total
The effects
compaction
were ignored
friction
over the reinforcement
behind
theresistance
failure surface
in
this preliminary
design. The total
pullout
inclusivewas
of
checked
to be
than the driving
forces
due to surface
the internal
the
friction
overgreater
the reinforcement
behind
the failure
was
lateral earth
pressure.
tensiondue
force
each
layer
checked
to be
greaterAlso,
thanthe
themaximum
driving forces
to inthe
internal
lateral earth pressure. Also, the maximum tension force in each layer 70
of reinforcement at the peak pullout resistance was checked not to
exceed its yield point.
71
unsat(kN/m3)
Table
5. Material conditions
and
parameters used
in PLAXIS213D.
M-C
Drained
22.7
Backfill
Table 5. Material conditions and
parameters used
in PLAXIS
3D.
3
Drained
19
17
Clayey sandy silt M-C
Soil Description
to
silty fine
Soilclayey
Description
sand
Backfill
Medium
dense
Backfillsand
Clayey
sandy silt
clayey
to
clayey
silty
Clayey sandy fine
silt
sand
to clayey silty fine
Stiff
to
very
stiff
Medium
dense
sand
clay
clayey
sand dense
Medium
clayey sand
Very
clay stiff
Stiff stiff
to very
clay
Stiff to very stiff
Hard
clay clay
E (kPa)
c' (kPa)
'
()
kx
(m/day)
ky
(m/day)
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
20,000
18,000
E (kPa)
E (kPa)
20,000
37,500
20,000
18,000
18,000
10
1c' (kPa)
c' (kPa)
10
5
110
1
37
33
'
()
'
()
37
34
37
33
33
0.8
0.001
kx
(m/day)
kx
(m/day)
0.8
0.001
0.8
0.001
0.001
0.4
0.0005
ky
(m/day)
ky
(m/day)
0.4
0.0005
0.4
0.0005
0.0005
Model
Model
M-C
M-C
M-C
M-C
Condition
Condition
Drained
Drained
Drained
Drained
sat (kN/m )
sat (kN/m3)
22.7
18
22.7
19
19
unsat(kN/m3)
unsat(kN/m3)
21
16
21
17
17
M-C
M-C
M-C
Undrained
Drained A
Drained
17
18
18
15
16
16
0.35
0.3
0.3
40,000
37,500
37,500
50
5
5
24
34
34
0.00002
0.001
0.001
0.00001
0.0005
0.0005
M-C
M-C
M-C
M-C
Undrained
Undrained A
A
Undrained A
Undrained A
17
17
17
17.5
15
15
15
15.5
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
50,000
40,000
40,000
80,000
80
50
50
100
26
24
24
28
0.00004
0.00002
0.00002
0.00004
0.00002
0.00001
0.00001
0.00002
M-C
Undrained A
17
15
0.35
50,000
80
26
Very stiff clay
0.00004
0.00002
Note:
Undrained
A uses
parameters
and strength in0.35
PLAXIS
3D.
M-Cthe effective
Undrained
A
17for stiffness15
50,000
80
26
Very stiff
clay
0.00004
0.00002
M-C
Undrained A
17.5
15.5
0.35
80,000
100
28
Hard clay
0.00004
0.00002
measured and simulated lateral deformations of the PE (on
M-C
Undrained A
17.5
15.5
0.35
80,000
100
28
Hard clay
0.00004
0.00002
No. 1 2014
Journal
Vol. is6 found
No. 1to2014
73
measured in the field Geotechnical
and the value of
settlement
be low
as the embankment was constructed on hard ground.
measured in the field and the value of settlement is found to be low
as the embankment was constructed on hard ground.
(a)
(a)
Figure
15.Compression
of the PE-MS
(b) Compression
of theprofile
embankment
(Levelsection.
0.00 m to Level 5.50
186 days
after
construction.
7.3 m)
Strains
in the
Reinforcements
7.3
Strains
in the Reinforcements
Figure
15.Compression
profilestrains
of the PE-MS
section. and polymeric
The
measured
and simulated
in the metallic
Surface
and
subsurface
settlement
plates
were
installed
in
the
reinforcement
were
in
good
agreement.
The
strains were
measured
7.2 Vertical Deformation
The
strains in the metallic
and polymeric
7.3 measured
Strains inand
thesimulated
Reinforcements
embankment at different locations to measure vertical settlements.
using vibrating-wire strain gauges in the metallic reinforcement
7.2 Vertical Deformation
reinforcement were in good agreement. The strains were measured
The maximum
settlement at
the base ofplates
the embankment
(Level
(SWG
and MS)and
andsimulated
using fibre
opticinstrain
gauges in
polymer
The measured
strains
the metallic
andthepolymeric
Surface
and subsurface
settlement
were installed
in 0.00
the
using vibrating-wire strain gauges in the metallic reinforcement
m)
ranged
from
60
to
80
mm
186
days
after
construction.
The
Surface
and
subsurface
settlement
plates
were
installed
in
the
geogrids
(PET,were
PP and
HDPE).
For the The
metallic
reinforcement,
the
reinforcement
in good
agreement.
strains
were measured
embankment at different locations to measure vertical settlements.
(SWG and MS) and using fibre optic strain gauges in the polymer
compression
ofsettlement
the foundation
found
increase
slightly
embankment
at
different
locations
to measure
vertical
settlements.
strains
were lower than
thegauges
geogridinstrains
becausereinforcement
the metallic
using vibrating-wire
strain
the metallic
The
maximum
at the was
base
of the to
embankment
(Level
geogrids
(PET,
PP
HDPE).
thestrain
metallic
reinforcement,
the
towards
the facing,
as shown
Fig.
for the PE-MS
section.
The maximum
settlement
at the in
base
of 15a
the embankment
(Level
0.00
reinforcement
much
stiffer
than
the
polymer
geogrids.
The
(SWG and
MS)was
andand
using
fibre For
optic
gauges
in
the polymer
0.00 m) ranged from 60 to 80 mm 186 days after construction. The
strains
were
lower
than
the
geogrid
strains
because
the
metallic
Similarly,
compression
of the
embankment
0.00 mThe
to
m) ranged the
from
60 to 80 mm
186
days after (Level
construction.
measured
and simulated
strains inFor
thethe
metallic
strips
(MS) after 125
geogrids (PET,
PP and HDPE).
metallic
reinforcement,
the
compression of the foundation was found to increase slightly towards
reinforcement
was
much
stiffer
than strains
the the
polymer
The
Level
5.50 m)ofvaried
20 to
mm, astoshown
in Fig.
15b,
compression
the between
foundation
was40 found
increase
slightly
and
186were
daysare
plotted
Fig.geogrid
16whereas
corresponding
strains
strains
lower
thaninthe
becausegeogrids.
the metallic
the
facing,
as
shown
in
Fig.
15a
for
the
PE-MS
section.
Similarly,
16b
and the
17bfacing,
for the
PE-MS insection.
hard section.
ground
towards
as shown
Fig. 15aDue
for to
thethe
PE-MS
measured
and simulated
the metallic
strips
aftergood
125
in
the polymer
geogridHDPE
areinplotted
in Fig.
17. In(MS)
general,
reinforcement
was muchstrains
stiffer
than
the
polymer
geogrids.
The
the
compression
ofmagnitudes
the embankment
(Level
0.00 m(Level
to Level
5.50
m)
foundation,
vertical
settlements
were
Similarly,
thethe
compression
of of
the the
embankment
0.00
m
to
and
186 daysare
plotted
in
Fig.
16whereas
the corresponding
strains
agreement
wassimulated
observed
between
measured
and simulated
measured
and
strains
in thethe
metallic
strips (MS)
after
125
varied
between
20
to 40
mm, as shown
in Fig.
16b andin17b
the
relatively
low.
The
settlement
of 15b,
the
PE-MS
section
at
Level 5.50
m) varied
between
20profile
to 40
mm,
as shown
Fig.for15b,
in
polymer
are
plotted
in the
Fig.corresponding
17.to
Inbilinear
general,strains
good
strains.
The
linegeogridHDPE
of maximum
strain
corresponded
rather
andthe
186
daysare
plotted
in Fig.
16whereas
PE-MS
Due
to the
hard section.
ground
foundation,
thehard
magnitudes
different
levels
of the
the
embankment
(0.00
the
base
of the
16b andsection.
17b for
PE-MS
Duem toat the
ground
than
behaviour.Theoretically,
the
strains
should
zerostrains.
atgood
the
agreement
was
observed between
measured
in thelinear
polymer
geogridHDPE
are the
plotted
in Fig.and
17.simulated
In be
general,
of
the
vertical
settlements
were
relatively
low.
The
settlement
profile
embankment
and
5.50
m
at
the
top
of
embankment)
are plotted
foundation, the magnitudes of the vertical settlements
were
end
of
embankment
(at astrain
distance
of 5m
facing)
but
due
to
agreement
observed
between
the from
measured
andrather
simulated
The
line
ofwas
maximum
corresponded
tothe
bilinear
than
of
the PE-MS
at differentdata
levels
the
(0.00the
m
together
with
the
in ofof
Fig.
15a,b.
relatively
low.section
The simulated
settlement
profile
theembankment
PE-MSOverall,
section
at
the
difficulties
inaccuracies
associated
with
strain
strains.
The line and
of maximum
strain
corresponded
bilinear
rather
linear
behaviour.Theoretically,
the strains
should
betosensitive
zero
at the
end
at
the baselevels
ofresults
the of
embankment
and 5.50
m the
at the
top
of embankment)
simulation
are
with
deformations
different
the consistent
embankment
(0.00
mvertical
at the
base of the
gauges,
there
is (at
certain
value of
strain
at
the
of reinforcements
than
linear
behaviour.Theoretically,
the
strains
should
be zero
at the
the
of
embankment
a distance
of 5m
from
the end
facing)
but
due to
embankment
and 5.50
at simulated
the top ofdata
embankment)
areOverall,
plotted
are
plotted together
withmthe
in Fig. 15a,b.
(see
Figs.
16
and
17).
end
of
embankment
(at
a
distance
of
5m
from
the
facing)
but
due
to
difficulties and inaccuracies associated with sensitive strain gauges,
together
with results
the simulated
data with
in Fig.
15a,b. deformations
Overall, the
the
simulation
are consistent
the vertical
the difficulties
and of
inaccuracies
with sensitive
there
is certain value
strain at theassociated
end of reinforcements
(seestrain
Figs.
73
simulationinresults
the vertical
measured
the fieldare
andconsistent
the value ofwith
settlement
is founddeformations
to be low as
gauges,
there is certain value of strain at the end of reinforcements
16
and 17).
the embankment was constructed on hard ground.
(see Figs. 16 and 17).
Figure 14. Figure showing tilt of inclinometer at the top of RSS
facing.Vertical Deformation
7.2
73
Geotechnical
Journal
Vol. 6Vol.
No.61 No.
20141 2014
74
Geotechnical
Journal
Geotechnical Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 2014
Figure 18. Observed data from total pressure cells 125 days and 186
days after
start of data
construction.
Figure
18.the
Observed
from total pressure cells 125 days and 186
days after the start of construction.
Figure 18. Observed data from total pressure cells 125 days and 186
days after the start of construction.