Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CEik2ACTERISTICS
AND
MEGiANISNfiIN CASTSTEEL
NIGEL HOWARD
CROFT M.A.
f
(Cantab. )
For Joe
(i)-
AND NEQHANIStiS
CHARACTERISTICS
FRACTURE
IN CAST STEEL
Nigel
By
Howard Croft,
M.A.
(Cantab. )
SYNOPSIS
The current
practices
foundry industry
of the UK steel
embrittlement
by segregation
effects,
and precipitation
fracture
Directional
solidified.
into
liquid
The
using various
optical
The plates
the adjacent
at a late
nucleate
austenite
and
at a later
are precipitated
plates
solidification
the
material.
(a plate-like
phenomena caused
techniques
optical
Emphasis
castings.
and in particular
electron
characteristics
mechanism of fracture
have been
A1N
The
stage of solidification.
is fully
and grow
relationship
of the form
(0001)//
The effects
{111}Y
<1010>A1N//
of some processing
rate.
<110>Y
variables
on the susceptibility
to IF
Tand
found
of heat treatment was also
(ii)
-
to be important,
more susceptible
to IF.
strength
explain
yield
effect
(Si).
of intergranular
on the initiation
are considered.
with
temperature.
testing
of IF observed
decrease
embrittlement,
can influence
displacement
cleavage strength
significantly.
there is little
strength,
of a casting.
in fracture
the variation
samples being
), however,
max
regard to engineering design
CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER
1
INTRODUCTION
2
CHAPTER
INDUSTRY- CURRENT
THE STEEL FOUNDRY
PRACTICES 6
2.1
Introduction
2.2
Steelmaking
2.2.1
Induction
2.2.2
Electric
2.3
Control
2.3.1
Oxygen
14
2.3.2
Nitrogen
17
2.3.3
Hydrogen
19
2.4
Solidification
2.4.1
Grain Structure
2.4.2
Solute Redistribution
CHAPTER3
Practice,
Arc Practice
11
of Gas Content
12
Behaviour
21
21
During Solidification
22
FRACTURENIECHANISINS
IN CAST STEEL
26
3.1
Introduction
26
3.2
Ductile
Fracture
27
3.3
Brittle
Cleavage Fracture
30
3.3.1
Theoretical
3.3.2
Fractographic
3.4
Brittle
3.4.1
Segregation Effects
Treatments
30
Aspects of Cleavage
Intergranular
Fracture
33
34
38
. =e y
3.4.1.1
Temper Embrittlement
40
3.4.1.2
Hot Tearing
44
3.4.2
Precipitation
3.4.2.1
Aluminium
3".4.2.2
Sulphide Precipitation
Effects
Nitride
Precipitation
47
49
'S1
Page
3.4.2.3
53
3.4.2.4
Vanadium Carbide
54
3.4.2.5
54
56
4.1
Introduction
56
4.2
Detection,
CHAPTER4
Precipitation
Observation
of AIN
"
and Indentification
56
4.2.1
Chemical
4.2.2
Metallographic
4.2.3
Other Techniques
4.3
4.3.1
Effect
of Heat Treatment
62
4.3.2
Effect
of Chemical Composition
63
4.4
The Solubility
4.4.1
In Austenite
67
4.4.2
In Liquid
69
4.4.3
Solute Interactions
69
4.5
Precipitation
70
4.5.1
Temperature
of Precipitation
70
4.5.2
Precipitate
Morphology
72
4.6
Other PhenomenaAttributable
Precipitation.
4.6.1
73
4.6.2
74
4.6.2.1
74
4.6.2.2
75
CHAPTER5
5.1
Methods of Detection
56
Techniques
58
59
Fracture
of A1N in Steel
67
Steel
of A1N
EXPERIIENTAL WORK
Introduction
60
to ALV
73
76
4
76.
Page
of Experimental
Melts
77
5.2
Production
5.3
Chemical Analysis
79
5.4
Heat Treatment
79
5.5
Mechanical Testing
80
5.5.1
Hardness Measurements
80
5.5.2
Three Point
80
5.5.3
Tensile
5.5.4
Impact Testing
81
5.5.5
83
5.6
Metallographic
Techniques
85
5.6.1
Macroscopic
85
5.6.2
Optical
85
5.6.3
Scanning Electron
5.6.4
Transmission
5.6.5
Electron
5.6.5.1
Specimen Preparation
88
5.6.5.2
Analysis
89
5.7
Directional
5.7.1
Details
5.7.2
The Solidification
5.7.3
91
5.7.4
A Typical
92
5.7.5
Specimen Examination
93
5.8
Industrial
93
CHAPTER6
6.1
Bend Testing
Testing
80
Microscopy
Microscopy
Electron
86
Microscopy
Probe Microanalysis
Solidification
86
88
Technique
90
90
91
Procedure
Examinations
94
RESULTS
The Mechanism of AIN-induced
Intergranular
94
Fracture
6.2
AIM Precipitation
6.2.1
Plate-like
AiM
97
9`'
Page
101
6.2.2
Dendritic
AIN
6.2.2.1
6.2.2.2
Metallographic
6.3
Effects
6.3.1
6.3.2
Carbon Content
104
6.3.3
Pouring Temperature
104
6.3.4
Heat Treatment
105
6.4
107
6.4.1
Tensile
6.4.2
Impact Testing
6.4.2.1
The Effect
6.4.2.2
Effect
6.4.2.3
The Effect
6.4.3
Fracture
Solidification
Work 101
102
Observations
102
of Processing Variables
102
Contents
107
Testing
108
of I. F. on Impact Properties
of Testing
109
Temperature
of Matrix
108
111
Hardness
111
Toughness Testing
DISCUSSION
115
7.1
Introduction
115
7.2
The Mechanism of I. F.
115
7.3
A1N Precipitation
119
7.3.1
Dendritic
120
7.3.2
Plate-like
7.4
7.4.1
7.4.2
Carbon Content
127
7.4.3
128
7.4.4
Heat Treatment
129
7.5
The Effect
7
Q-LAPTER
7.5.1
7.5.2
Tensile
A1N
123
A1N
on the
Contents
of I. F. on Mechanical Properties
Properties
Impact Properties
125
125
131
131
132
Page
134
Toughness
7.5.3
Fracture
7.5.3.1
7.5.3.2
7.5.3.3
CHAPTER8
(Si)
134
max)
6u and 6
Commentary on c5 Si,
,
max
135
136
138
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
Toughness Testing
Al
APPENDIX 1
Fracture
APPENDIX 2
Report
to Foundry
'A'
A6
APPENDIX 3
Report
to Foundry
'B'
A14
APPENDIX 4
APPENDIX 5
Calculation
of the Microsegregation
Characteristics
Solidification
TABLES
FIGURES
of Al and N during
AZO
A22
TEXT
-1-
Chapter
Introduction
The casting
to provide
route continues
and fabrication.
Steel
mining
and mineral
power generating
iron
processing,
industry
earth
there is direct
and the
1979).
from a forging
competition
on purely
industry.
plant
have a
moving equipment,
and steel
(Reynolds,
of metal
engineering
plant,
usually
quality
and
components
in particular
castings
used in chemical
versatile
in the fields
in the mechanical
number of applications
They are widely
engineering
certain
developments
of many recent
a uniquely
directly
dictate
but very
Although
route.
to final
shape is
integrity
heat-treated
of mechanical properties
carbon and alloy
content
in comparable
wrought
Alloy
compositions
mechanical
cast structure.
of the steel,
These properties
is
inherently
(Nakajima
materials
but
et al,
it
to cater
of
than
The
1977).
of random defects.
and detection
are available
the
the incidence
requirements,
wrong
the casting.
main problem
there is nothing
for
is necessary
most physical
to ensure
that
and
the
-2-
will
castings
imperfections
perform as specified,
arise
which often
of linear
the techniques
In recent years,
inspection
design
and
as
a
used
increasingly
with greater
confidence,
(Selby,
unimportant
is imperative
ductile-brittle
it
under
it would be totally
transition.
important,
fracture
lowering
of the toughness.
steel
is often
referred
castings
is usually
in a
fracture
(I. F. ) which
foundry as a result
and result
is intergranular
to more pictorially
however, is the
fracture
in the adoption
can result
toughness data if
in service
making
castings,
of any discontinuities
this
can be predicted.
conditions
inappropriate
Whilst
1979).
it
specification,
Such
design criteria
of more realistic
service
to large steel
possible
in the
tool
techniques
fracture
elastic
fracture
it
from
large
tonnages
within
of
of cracking
in the mould.
encountered at temperatures
the
Intergranular
ductile
the
above
to
-3(cleavage)
brittle
factor
resulting
toughness.
causes, investigations
contributory
in a dramatic reduction
transition,
to be the precipitation
austenite
Preferential
the fracture
as-cast boundaries.
This behaviour
on the fracture
a plate-like
little
form.
by the presence
surface.
(1960) and Wright and
on the fracture
of aluminium nitride
the original
is characterised
by subsequent heat
appears to follow
still
failure
on the prior
of aluminium nitride
Since this
a dendritic
surface,
and
fracture
of commercial failures,
is still
a cause of serious
concern among
foundrymen.
The aim of this
research is therefore
in experimentally
this
and commercially
to the fracture
steels,
and relating
A steel
of nominal composition
to intergranular
0.30%C, 1.500h
to be particularly
Initially,
melted
mechanisms observed.
behaviour
experimental
susceptible
castings were
to different
subjected
heat treatments
Fracture
hardness levels.
In parallel
this
with
Directional
control
greater
over processing
information
and the
precipitates
out,
obtained by fracture
parameters.
of T. F. on mechanical properties
the effects
the
solidification
In order to quantify
In this
in an inter-
of the precipitation
observed.
more clearly
crystallography
exert
electron
manner.
granular
details
a range of
surfaces
produced castings
of commercially
to obtain
and were
examined optically
microscopes.
contents,
compared to
implications
of intergranular
fracture
could be assessed.
Chapter 2 gives a general outline
use in the UK steel
of the steelmaking
formdry industry
associated
research in its
can fail
theories
discussed briefly,
tuendernormal service
of ductile
and brittle
methods in
This is intended
context.
mechanisms by
conditions.
(cleavage)
The
fracture
are
intergranular
which
under
-5fracture
Several particular
T. F. are described
in causing T. F. is discussed in
causes of
of AIN.
of the solubility
and
research,
the experimental
techniques
(tensile,
These include
used in the
established
electron
and are
metallography,
toughness) and
solidification.
and 8 give the results,
discussion
and conclusions,
-6Chapter 2
The Steel Foundry Industry
2.1
Current
Practices
-
Introduction
literature
to the fracture
to survey briefly
light
is pertinent
solution
in the UK.
castings
research in context,
dictate
it
the various
This will
of cast steel,
relevant
high-
and will
which often
problem cannot be
to a scientific
implemented in practice.
The business of the steel
carbon, low alloy
plain
areas of application
are available
foundry industry
and high alloy
is the production
steel
General
castings.
of
Casting processes
to the production
of virtually
any
and in
any quantity,
from a "one-off"
In 1978, British
of castings
foundries
to many millions.
produced approximately
250,000 tonnes
machining,
and
a total
production
7M tonnes,
world
1979).
2.2
Steelmaking
steel
furnaces,
being introduced
is melted mainly by
although
for special
techniques
such as
applications.
-7-
foundries
route,
by other techniques
this
by
75%
that
almost
weight of all
means
furnace
arc
practice,
using
made
it
arc steelmaking
induction
practice,
producing
small quantities.
castings
produced are
This is highlighted
for
by a summary of
(Table 2.1).
Table 2.1
Although
capacities
currently
Arc furnaces
<St
61
Induction
In addition,
These figures
It
10-20t
20-30t
20
15
43
TOTAL
>30t
103
furnaces
<O.5t
67
but will
5-10t
0.5-1t
96
1-2t
26
13 converter-type
209
be
doubt
affected
no
TOTAL
>2t
20
constant
by recent closures
few years,
in the industry.
for
to
castings
orders
accept
equipped
of all
furnaces
there
seven
are
only
example,
in operation
having a capacity
of 20 tonnes or more.
weights.
be
For
in the UK
A customer requiring
be limited
in his choice of
-8but it
foundry,
to
a
approach
by utilising
Practice
Induction
route,
furnaces.
of a number of smaller
capacity
2.2.1
foundry industry,
produced by this
the
many induction
Induction
furnaces are less expensive than arc furnaces to buy and install,
and their
smaller
(usually
sizes
suited
for service
regular
intervals.
where casting
all
furnace bodies,
switched into
the lining
is to occur at short,
for a foundry
to have
steels,
steels,
one generator.
This is particularly
furnace is normally
most of the alloys
being retained
in the final
melt.
important,
contained
Careful
unit,
in the initial
selection
with
charge
of scrap for
crucial,
specifications.
of experiments
meant that
the nitrogen
reported
by Holt and
elements from
from
but
is possible
charge material
increased from
to 0.017% after
the third
-9-
This resulted
remelting.
in porosity
in the finished
which highlights
by the continuous
of internal
recycling
induction
furnace practice.
Induction
basic
(MgO) lining,
is its
associated
an acid (Si02) or
having its
each practice
disadvantages.
and
advantages
lining
is about half
practice
shot blasted
siliceous
intact
Some foundries
actually
oxidised
or sand-free
induction
In acid practice,
will
react with
lining.
once a'molten
it
so that
such as the
In preparing
oxide present
casting,
any iron
of the
scrap is used.
unit
This is carried
for melting
can occur.
furnaces.
the
small pieces
is
the
there
the
surface
melt
of
and
no preheating
under
In dead melting
are
This results
in the
in high yields
(Hubbard, 1972).
the furnace
10
together
with all
have
these
melted out,
when
bring
into
the steel
Final
additions
are made to
as possible.
is carried
with aluminium)
out either
or both.
in the ladle,
rapidly
has to retain
To overcome this
furnace normally
there
power utilisation,
increase
temperature
will
because
the induction
and
and
additions,
specification.
(usually
deoxidation
in the furnace,
If
the oxidisable
temperature
to the required
alloying
at all
times,
of the melt
and immediately
after
the furnace.
Although it
a dead melting
is not entirely
this
unit,
that
it
by the addition
is possible
correct.
furnace is
Holt and
to promote a controlled
of small quantities
of ore to the
the induction
selected,
also serves to
hydrogen levels.
2.2).
proposition
and
been introduced
several
furnaces
but
designs
furnace
new
11
for
operation
allow
which
of steel
the composition
thereby obviating
castings
production
far
as the steelmaker
as
main advantage
slags,
arc furnace is
to refine
lowering
Arc Practice
Electric
further
of the liquid
The
selection
of
charge materials.
The most versatile
unit
makes it
available
is the necessity
has
restricted
which
although acid lined
low phosphorus,
composed slags
with
the required
runners),
scrap (turnings,
etc).,
to proceed.
in Britain,
chemical
(oxidising
low sulphur
arc
possible
produce a casting
It
electric
available.
to charging,
such as anthracite,
it
is usual
coke or
12
It has long been recognised
is generally
and it
steel,
(Holt,
dissolved
prefer
to be exercised
The first
control
controlled,
techniques
for analysing
(the
"checkpoint"
the
content
of
melt
carbon
type liquidus
apparatus)
arrest
"catch-carbon"
2.3
of rapid
has resulted
the fact
state
effects
that
casting.
at the liquidus.
be rejected
for the
and structural
This is a consequence of
of many gases in the liquid
decreasing
temperature,
during solidification,
the
steel
decreases steadily
therefore
gases in liquid
of the solidified
very sharply
easier.
of Gas Content
integrity
popularity
in more
technique.
Control
deleterious
in greater
Others
required
oxygen contents,
predictable
little
period,
of the-bath
is less easily
level.
method requires
should be terminated.
to the required
or just
by the specification.
gases to acceptable
to oxidise
prefer
content of
Some foundries
is the
agreed that
is sufficient
levels
in controlling
factor
prime
carbon boil
that a vigorous
give rise
to porosity
and drops
in the casting.
out
13
-
the control
of the gases
and effects
during
steelmaking.
encountered
commonly
Jackson (1975) found it
convenient
ii)
The elemental
iv)
gases.
(e.
g. 02, N2, H2).
gases
diatomic
iii)
The triatomic
Of these,
gases.
diatomic
four groups:
gases into
i)
to divide
insolubility
temperatures
at all
since their
out undesirable
example of this
is the ladle
1965).
degassing of steel
hydrogen
the
and nitrogen
can
reduce
which
The solution
by Sievert
by its
stirring
of diatomic
have to dissociate
using argon,
contents quite
effect.
gases in liquid
A typical
homogeneity of temperature
and composition
virtual
(Fast,
from
the
melt
gases
significantly,
and hydrogen.
oxygen, nitrogen
are the
steel
was first
that
proposed
such gases
monatomic solutions.
For the reaction
G2
2G (metal)
2
K=[CC-G]
where
[G3
K is the equilibriin
is the activity
constant
in
the melt.
atoms
of gas
diatomic
the
of
14
Assuming ideal
C11
G3
K'
then
directly:
law follows
Sievert's
gas behaviour,
where PGZ is
PG,.
the partial
of gas
pressure
vacuum steelmaking
facilities
foundry industry,
dissolved
gas will
always be present
in the
steel,
and will
of blowholes or porosity
by the addition
in the
of alloying
combine with
in a suitably
innocuous form.
Oxygen
steel,
is
vital
carbon
oxygen and
a positive
disadvantage
manifest
as blowholes
or semi-killed
Although
during
the reaction
the steelmaking
between
it
process,
is
of steel
in the finished
castings
castings
role
the quality
(Jackson, 1975).
significantly
steel
in the liquid
Clearly,
casting.
available
that
in the formation
not result
2.2.1)
and so it
to
during
steelmaking.
steel
is extremely difficult
it
killed
product.
For this
reason,
high
15
-
iron,
in liquid
solubility
arc practice
is allowed to progress
will
become dissolved
final
rise
yields
in electric
of deoxidants,
at all
the steel
in an attempt to avoid
(Wilson,
costs.
and the
1981).
problem.
By terminating
be lower,
the boil
If
of the melt.
This has a
at 1540C and
to the control
relevance
particular
of carbon monoxide.
pressures
partial
various
to
prior
is controlled
deoxidation
in steel
the solubility
technique
technique
at a
behaviour
generally
means
of the steel
weak deoxidants
to proceed.
is normally
to the furnace
(silicon
to prevent pinhole
latter
because of its
deoxidant
Aluminium is widely
in the
used
in
bars,
form
99%
Al
the
purpose
of
rods or
pure
relatively
porosity.
of
to use titanium
Many steel
for deoxidation
compared to
foundries
16
it
a "dirty"
produces
is generally
levels
variable
although
of recovery
of deleterious
the formation
inclusions,
or even pin-hole
The usual
morphology
(angular)
is type III
satisfactory,
II
type
of impact
loss
an associated
with
strength.
low.
steel
in
manganese sulphide
porosity
when yields
of sulphide
inclusions
are particularly
in steel
castings
a low oxygen
with
content.
A major problem may, however,
of the deoxidant
quantities
the aluminium
this
circumstances
boundaries
during
cause severe
this
which
will
embrittlement.
that
in recent
used for
and can
The conditions
in greater
deoxidation
years,
furnace,
under
depth in
dead-melted
of the state
induction
deoxidation
addition
of oxidation
furnace
than a heavily
of prediction
regardless
for
grain
of the casting,
cooling
be considered
any nitrogen
Under certain
nitride.
on the as-cast
will
to lie
stoichiometric
to combine with
precipitate
intergranular
for
3 and 4.
Chapters
It
free
to form aluminium
the initial
occurs
are used.
the oxygen is
in the steel
present
when excessive
which
with
combination
be encountered
is thought
this
of oxygen content
of a fixed
of the bath.
heat will
require
blown electric-arc
in
contents
in the
amount of aluminium
Clearly
less
aluminium
melt.
172.3.2
Nitrogen
The absorption
operations
and refining
years,
by iron
of nitrogen
century,
nineteenth
of intensive
Indeed this
vary slightly
with
investigation.
The
when Allen
melted steels
for many
during melting
alloys
presence of nitrogen
and its
the different
is the range
steelmaking
content does
Speith and Vom Ende (1959) and Kuhn and Detrez (1962) have made
surveys of the nitrogen
levels
nitrogen
contents
associated
into
introduced
is usually
ferro-alloys
contact
Any nitrogen
pig iron and
quite
solubility
varies
with
1975).
of 0.045 wt%N
in which this
Fig.
are normally
temperature
is shown in
2.4.
In liquid
steel,
the solubility
Strong nitride
2.5) while
the solubility
forming elements
quite
reduce it
slightly.
in
liquid
found
commonly
steel
18
is much less than the solubility
is kinetic,
since it
1962).
The
before it
the melt.
(Wright,
limit.
can be incorporated
metal is usually
the liquid
protected
difficult.
absorption
Induction
this
benefit
with
the absence of
can often
levels
being encountered.
In certain
deliberately
increased
(Cottrell,
is
content
1975a), nitrogen
additions
are
nitride,
the dissociation
reported
during
of molecular
is a result
that this
Nitrogen
with
has been
of iron,
the absorption
law.
Indeed it
nitrogen.
by Sievert's
problems associated
of nitrogen
can
the nitrogen
near the
and eliminating
barrier.
is well
at temperatures within
the ferrite
range.
with
iron
Paranjpe et al,
In steels,
however, it
elements present
of five
is unusual to find
usually
distinct
evidence
combines with
other
nitride.
19
Pearson and Ende (1953) collected
and their
results
are summarised in
is:
of the nitrides
ZrN, TiN, AJN, BN, Si3N41 VN, Cr2N, CrN and Fe4N. The nitrides
formed by zirconium
and titanium
of their
assumed that
if
in austenite
a sufficient
quantity
present,
used extensively
and ferrite,
be formed (Wright,
in a steel
for deoxidation.
casting,
1962).
of the casting
since it
is
combine with
precipitates.
of these precipitates
the properties
can be
rejected
it
former present
stable nitride
will
and because
as will
on
be discussed in subsequent
Chapters.
2.3.3
H dy
rogen
of hydrogen in steel
castings
on transition
(1981) point
This mobility
diffusion
casting
of hairline
These
state.
but,
with nitrogen
high mobility
of the
even at
in the
of the solidified
cracks.
In steelmaking,
contributions
as
tendency
as a result
to the solid
is its
in the
content of
20
elements cannot be discounted
and alloying
refractories
(Jackson,
1975).
With the exception
bath
of steel
a
of
content
the hydrogen
heats,
bath
by
from
is
hydrogen
the
the action
purged
at which
During the boil,
carbon boil.
falls
Hence double-slag
period.
levels
a subsequent increase
to prevent
than single
is
generally
to approximately
impossible
of the
variations
1974).
Air-melted
casts usually
gives rise
to problems in smaller
the surface
contain
inside
not possible
alloying
and costly
critical
it
diffusion
to
however, most of
and can only be
Since it
annealing.
with
is
other
the casting
where diffusion
elements,
for large,
castings
In heavy sections,
is possible.
removed by lengthy
(Jackson,
In this way, it
is possible
1975).
cracking
lppm
are largely
21
Behaviour
Solidification
2.4
Grain Structure
2.4.1
The classical
is shown in Fig.
intermediate
by material
composition,
temperature
pouring
The
equiaxed zone.
proportions
and processing
of a casting
zone, the
representation
variables
such as alloy
(Davies
The chill
dendrites
caused by pouring
as a result
and convection.
in the melt
crystals
strong
show a preferred
1962).
1967).
growth
interface.
of mechanical properties
extends until
become obstructed
at the solid/liquid
anisotropy
and Herbert,
of
of thermal undercooling,
b)
zone arises
orientation
along
of dendritic
has
in the
producing
i)
equiaxed crystals:
isolated
heterogeneous nucleation
(Chalmers, 1963).
ii)
fragmentation
et al,
1966).
(Jackson
the
columnar
growing
zone
of
22
iii)
nucleation
(Southin,
All
degrees, and it
to varying
crystals
processing
variables
facilitates
control
equiaxed grain
to influence
solidify
elements on a microscopic
theoretical
composition
as solidification
complexity
(Flemings,
All
mixing
are derived
is macroscopically
interface
A schematic representation
approximation
freezing
not strictly
is incorporated.
the solid/liquid
distribution
speed.
predicted
but the
to the solidification
of a steel
alloying
to
2.9.
These vary in
the variation
conditions
in the liquid
of the solute
simplest
proceeds.
assuming that
planar
or by
of solute
redistribution
concurrent
For example,
During Solidification
Solute Redistribution
is well
of
It
is the manipulation
cast structure.
is often
of heterogeneous nucleants
2.4.2
of equiaxed
of the final
formation
to the origin
contribute
state
casting
in the liquid
The latter
diffusion
is
coefficients
orders of
23
-
magnitude smaller
in the solid
redistribution
of solute
be ignored.
can usually
The
exceptions
in the solid
may be
significant.
For the unidirectional
composition
liquid
interface
of a bar of initial
solidification
is given by
Cs = Cok (1 - fS)k-l
(2.1)
fs
is
fraction
the
where
solid
k is the equilibrium
partition
be rewritten
composition
coefficient.
in terms of the liquid
liquid
(fL)
CL = Co fLk-1
since
(2.2)
Cs = kCL and
fs + fL =1
and providing
will
to as the Scheil
2.9.
there is little
solidification
proceeds,
Initially,
overall
reached.
In practice
castings,
but considerable
this
Equations,
becomes solute
temperature
microsegregation
S
does
P
can
and
and
occur.
as
such
but as
enriched
k is constant,
extreme is rarely
to the situation
corresponding
change in composition,
coefficient
an invariant
so the liquid
the partition
remain until
approximation
of the solid
some liquid
(e. g. a eutectic)
achieved in steel
of alloying
elements
described
is
be
the
would
above
24
of an interdendritic
formation
grossly
containing
lead to differential
including
flow.
density
1970;
this
of liquid
of pouring
to just
and
Flemings and
completely,
analysis
before
1968;
which
is not inconsiderable.
variation
differences
macrosegregation
contributory
enriched liquid
(Flemings et al,
Mehrebian et al,
In large castings
movements of solute
fluid
solute
in the casting.
causes of macrosegregation,
Nereo, 1968;
in high local
result
of macrosegregation
interdendritic
in a steel
Fe-FeS eutectic
final
(Wilson,
solidification
1981).
Table 2.3
Variation
in liquid
metal analysis
from start
to finish
pouring
Liquid
Composition
C*
Si
Mn
Al
Ti
Initial
0.12
0.40
1.16
0.042 0.01
Final
0.37
0.56
1.17
0.018 0.02
of arc feeding.
25
Thus it
of a casting
inhomogeneities
macro-segregation
significantly
a specification,
arising
section.
from microproperties
and
vary
26
3
Chapter
Fracture
3.1
Introduction
Mechanics based design philosophy
inherent
fracture
it
parameter,
of any defects
is possible
and Wright,
factorily
However, this
can be predicted,
most important
mode of steels
triaxiality
with greater
factors
under service
mechanism.
narrow temperature
conditions
steel
over a
with
a change
cleavage to dull
crystalline
of the effect
fibrous
on impact
3.1. a.
it
is desirable
to operate under
the requirement
temperature
of
there is usually
fracture
is associated
A schematic representation
castings
the addition
the fracture
In mild steels,
conditions
of this
(Jackson
a sharp transition
fracture.
confidence,
of safety
1973a).
if
(Knott,
resistance
in the material
present
in conventional
by a quantitative
design factors
is to
elements
t
for
for a minimum
(BS 3100,1976:
be achieved quite
readily
by
27
steel
impact
transition
lower
the
which
1972), or by modification
inherently
tougher microstructure.
Although
castings
to produce an
on the fracture
effect
in
steel
can
occur
phenomena
in a lowering
which result
of the fracture
in steel
embrittlement
in steel
fracture
detail
3.2
and brittle
based on the
failure.
of
mode
expected
Wright and Quarrell
since they
invalidate
can completely
important,
toughness
be ductile
the
steel would otherwise
temperatures
where
at
and tough.
(Reed-Hill,
temperature,
3.1. b.
the mechanisms of
castings.
Fracture
Ductile
ductile
for
mechanism
accepted
The generally
void nucleation
at inclusions
fracture
is one of
followed
typical
dull
fibrous
samples prior
in the light
This results
to final
microscope,
failure
in the
surface,
on
as dimples.
by inclusions
(1950).
was first
By unloading
proposed
tensile
longitudinal
examining
and
sections
28
of voids and inclusions.
association
Further
indirect
support
for this
reported
that an increase
resulted
in inferior
in the inclusion
pure iron
surfaces
inclusion
temperature.
of inclusion
containing
in electrolytically
By examining fracture
a minimum inclusion
a void,
energies without
more quantitative
the effects
content of steel
between the
relationship
In general,
3.2).
by the separation
of the
interface.
this
For inclusions
will
contrast
to this,
are relatively
precipitates
strains
strongly
the ductile
fracture
is these inclusions
fibrous
fracture
and nitrides
formed by vacancy
stresses
of cast steels
It
is therefore
will
large sulphides
(Figs.
In
and oxides,
3.3 to 3.5).
of these inclusions
clear
be dominated by
surfaces
1973J.
and
of the particles.
(Knott,
such as carbides
and
observed on
Control
of the
29
effect
ductility
on the tensile
of steel,
(1971).
Mclvor
Holmes
Gladman,
and
of
3.6 demonstrates
Fig.
fraction
matrix
sulphides
of inclusion/
by comparing results
for
and carbides.
play an important
role
the fracture
strain,
the fracture
in determining
details
control
In particular
of
they cannot
account for the spacing and size of the small voids or dimples
which are frequently
may not contain
(1960) first
inclusions
recognised
but that
not coalesce,
at all.
surface,
(Crussard et al,
1956).
and which
Rogers
need
by sheets of very
small voids which form in the shear bands between the macro
This essentially
inclusions.
shear on a microscopic
process is presented
The intervention
scopic level
fracture,
in Fig.
is that
evidence of the
as shear lips
or as slant
of
prevents
and is manifest
the intervention
of a ductile
usually
type fracture,
represents
fracture
of a fully
on bend specimens.
fibrous
of an internally
The
the
cracked
As a result,
dimples in this
region,
the fracture
relatively
few surface
30
Cleavage
Brittle
3.3
Treatments
Theoretical
3.3.1
In steels,
low ductilities.
with
associated
cleavage fracture
tensile
uniaxial
stress
mode of
but
As a
state.
at
and is usually
high
by
strain
a
also
result,
the transgranular
{100}
along
planes,
of the b. c. c. matrix
fracture
failure
Fracture
(Armstrong,
1977).
cleavage crack,
in detail,
they differ
and whilst
some yielding
of a slip
representation
pile-up
highly
applied
acting
tensile
(since yield
that
is necessary
of dislocations
concentrated
became clear
or a grain boundary.
it
On the
the blocking
involve
slightly
in a grain
stress
stress
3.8, where a
of diameter d produces a
band.
An
to a shear stress
'C
a will
A typical
give rise
band, where r
by
Since
slip proceeds
-a/2.
movement, this shear stress is opposed by a friction
on the slip
dislocation
of the lattice
contributions
to slip
(the Peierls-Nabarro
force),
31
and from clusters
band as a freely
the slip
treating
deformation,
is attained
value of stress
in the adjacent
derived a relationship
QF = Qi + kF d'z
grain,
required
to the local
of this
(d):
tensile
stress
equation
stress will
be noted,
conditions
Their results
indicated
that
It was-predicted
that
ti
the important
is the effective
= *Cy -'Ci
shear stress
in causing cleavage
(`Ceff), where
S
d"2
I>,
=
is the applied
(3.2)
required
from
to spread yield
to grain.
represents
the resistance
of the grain
analysis
fails
to slip.
to explain
is high,
i)
state.
would spread.
is nucleation-controlled.
stress
shear stress
the
in length of the
in a decrease in total
thereby implying
fractures
by considering
once nucleated,
any increase
between
grain
to
required
derivations
ry
to nucleate
The similarity
Leff
Stroh (1957)
(3.1)
kF
is related
where
fracture
By
slipping
fracture
and considering
atoms.
of solute
the yield
is not significantly
32
-
from its
different
The experimental
results
be growth controlled
temperature
a certain
within
nucleation
regime
number of grains
fracture.
after
containing
must
This implies
step.
tensile
that
There is also a
which is not
stress,
The Cottrell
fracture
is based on a dislocation
for
allows
growth of the crack to be the
which
mechanism
factor
controlling
theory,
dislocations
of two partial
to form a sessile
in iron
an easy nucleation
process.
1958).
(Cottrell,
In this
by providing
on intersecting
edge dislocation,
by the interaction
{101} slip
according
planes
to the
reaction
7
[111
(101)
+ 7
This therefore
[111]
(101)
the first
provides
(see Fig.
into
a
wedge
of
(001)
Cottrell
of this
crack nucleus to be
(3.3)
d-
32
(1973b) likens
By energy considerations,
aF
'
10013
Y
where c
is the stress
required
for fracture
33
Hence this
explains
stress,
Cd-I) in a similar
of grain size
and
way to the
Stroh analysis.
It
that hardening,
is also predicted
the grain
size,
will
contain
stress
by raising
the
point.
for homogeneous
carbides
for example.
can provide
easy sites
of cracking
nucleated
3.10.
into
in
of carbides,
to be associated
An example
is presented
cementite
Fig.
stresses
at the yield
samples of iron,
polycrystalline
and predicts
low fracture
with
the experimental
results
of
Aspects of Cleavage
Fractographic
Cleavage fractures,
once nucleated,
the resulting
fracture
(Fig.
Microscopically,
3.11).
a series
of ridges
markings".
represent
a difference
highly
the surface
crystallographic
plane,
and
facets
reflecting
of the facets
may show
exhibits
of "river
facet,
surface
that
of following
this.
a
in the crystal
structure,
34
planes (Gilman, 1956).
evidence that
markings (Herzberg,
appearance of river
the effects
is generally
and it
proceeds,
of the river
1976).
An example of the
boundary.
high
a
angle
grain
of
has
from
right
advanced
crack
planar
to left
of "flow"
cleavage planes
include
markings
dislocations
screw
and
interphase
interfaces,
to the formation
inclusions
(Gilman, 1956).
Although most cleavage fractures
on the fracture
details
appearance,
by the microstructure
features
this
is the fracture
quasi-cleavage.
3.4
Brittle
of the steel,
complex.
influenced
and the
A good example of
defined
tempered
cleavage facets
as
3.13).
Intergranular
are often
of an untempered or lightly
structure,
can be identified,
surface
and composition
martensitic
exhibit
Fracture
mechanisms in cast steels,
namely
boundaries
grain
35
are not an inherent
dating
observations
source of weakness.
However, numerous
to the fact
particles
or precipitate
that alter
grain boundary
the localised
chemistry.
through intergranular
alloys
failure
situations,
give rise
fracture
to intergranular
(1978).
and Banerji
into
classified
which
in Fig.
i)
to
principally
embrittlement,
serious
susceptible
any detectable
phase
precipitation.
The presence of discrete
ii)
precipitates.
iii)
The action
of certain
iv)
The action
of stresses
the embrittling
It
and (ii)
at high temperatures.
applied
effect
will
is generally
accepted that
the intergranular
in steels
will
present,
(Briant
boundaries,
environments.
These factors
(i)
corrosive
and Banerji,
or in their
fracture
path
1978).
absence, martensite
ferrite
packet or
36
In some circumstances
boundaries.
propagation,
even a particle/matrix
a previously
with
a favourable
situation
existing
be discussed later.
will
cohesion,
fracture
metals to intergranular
By considering
on two surfaces
of
a schematic stress/separation
formed in a fracture
process (Fig.
3.15),
it
can
am
should occur.
approximation,
are proportional
then
QmaY
a comparison of grain boundary cohesions by
This facilitates
examination
of the appropriate
For an intergranular
fracture
macroscopic surface
energy of
(3.4)
(the surface
is
by
given
1b*)
Yb* =2YS-Yb
where
energies.
strength
of the matrix,
a measure of susceptibility
boundary
aclo it
is possible
for intergranular
to
fracture.
37
proceeds by the parting
planes'{hkl},
crystallographic
act
cc Ycl*
then
C3.5)
Yhkl
=2
is
the surface
Yct*
where
created surfaces.
2YS -
Yb
(3.6)
2Y1
(1968)
cohesive energies
(Table 3.1).
Table 3.1
Cohesive Energies for
Intergranular
Fracture Path
Energy (mJ/m2)
Y(om)
Intergranular
(Average Plane)
1754(average)
y*
cl
yb
462
Yb*
3047
Yb*
0.87
Ycl
is clear
the lattice
difference
(100)
Cleavage
(110)
(111)
1670
1745
1848
3340
3490
3696
0.91
0.87
0.82
{100}
of
planes,
intergranular
although
is so marginal
it
have any
38
on the fracture
effect
process.
It
is usually
discrete
species
or
presence of segregated
only in the
precipitate
particles
detail.
Segregation Effects
3.4.1
In comparison with
the situation
there is theoretically
failure
granular
well
will
known that
only a marginal
expectation
in preference
it
is
and Banerji,
related
to cast steels
pertinent
described
1978).
will
intergranular
fracture,
later,
phenomena
but first
it
is
to consider
occurs.
There have been numerous observations
the segregation
of residual
corresponding
of segregation
indication
Although
it
in absolute
terms, this
on inter-
measure. of fracture
a useful
would be inappropriate
between
on the relationship
model gives
failure
set of cleavage
39
-
Gibbs
by
the
adsorption
given
dy =-
is
(3.7)
RTT'd (loge X)
The effect
alloy
form
the
takes
which
isotherm,
is
dy
the energy change corresponding
where
interval
binary
to a bulk composition
interfacial
concentrations
enrichment.
on the surface
systems.
of the residual
elements,
inherent
energy will
function
is
in
turn
a
which
intergranular
fracture
a ratio
surfaces,
(ob(s)*)
Y-brS_
in the system,
heat treatment.
of prior
Qb(S)
3.16
2Ys
m-x
m-x
yb
-
(3.8)
2Ys - Yb
to the alloy
(metal-solute
X).
m-x refers
The experimental
)xI
in
general,
and
ys,
: 0.5.
energy is given by
in equation
(3.8)
the relative
applies
Using
cohesion
40
Despite the crude approximations
the experimental
used in this
observations
This
Yb*
YC1*
of
values
since
above,
a direct
to obtain
value of
'Yb(s)
Yct *
Yb*
Yb (s) *X
T*
(see Table
are 0.8-0.9
the cohesion
boundary
will
segregated
at a
predicted
of Seah and
lattice
Compared with
and typical
Yct*
3.1).
Yb s*z0.4
Ycl*
gives
an intergranular
mode of failure
would
be expected.
3.4.1.1
(T. E. )
Temper Embrittlement
steels,
to steel
The segregation
in steel
castings
will
of residual
be presented here.
impurities
extensively
is subjected
the embrittlements
(Banerji
and Briant,
loss of ductility.
lead to intergranular
1980) and
from segregation
resulting
cycle to
in slightly
cracking
at various
different
41
N
(Briant
in steels.
impurities
as trace
table
of the periodic
1978).
and Banerji,
Table 3.2
CommonGrain Boundary Embrittlers
Va
IVa
Group
Si
PS
Ge
As
Se
Sn
Sb
Te
research into
Historically,
VIa
into
two regimes.
ment as it
increases,
decrease in fracture
exhibits
of this
the actual
recently,
remained speculative.
as the tempering
an anomalous
type of embrittlement
have
mechanism responsible
Work by Briant
in low alloy
steels
has,
and Banerji
substantial
however,
alloying
most cases,
aluminium are present
sulphur
The
until
(<400C).
decreases monotonically
yet the steel
has been
and nitrogen
In
in the steel
respectively,
compounds with
in
SHEFFIELD
UNIVERSITY
42
in the austenite
solution
in its
boundaries
elemental
impurity
reason, phosphorus
crack nucleating
-a
to O.S. T. E.
For this
to
is first
site
required.
At tempering temperatures
transforms
the structure
(Lenient et al,
prior
austenite
1954).
grain boundaries
to nucleate
a brittle
the
with
intergranular
cementite
in
additional
crack.
Moreover,
of cementite
of phosphorus segregation
slip
can
by solute
rejection
is
sufficient
which
of
in isolation.
purity
steel
isation,
At higher
embrittlement
to promote intergranular
little
segregation
during austenit-
region,
no
was observed.
tempering temperatures
be vulnerable
fracture
effectiveness
no longer
as crack nucleating
sites.
43
b)
in toughness
transition
temperature
are isothermally
steels
is
when a steel
slowly
days to cool
after
be rapidly
cannot
castings
is particularly
This
temperatures.
take
cooled
observed
range
be observed
may also
tempering
at relatively
important
in practice
cores may
to room temperature.
by the addition
is retarded
as molybdenum, titanium
However, after
more potent
of alloying
elements such
or boron.
other
embrittlers
and within
induce
intergranular
to
can occur
al,
cause
segregates readily
diffusion
high
since
low-
when tempered
(McMahon, 1975).
375-560C
large
is often
that
to the
in the ductile-brittle
and increase
decrease
alloy
(T. S. T. E. ) refers
Temper Embrittlement
Two-step
100-200hrs.
brittle
sufficient
fracture
segregation
(Mulford
et
1976).
The actual
fully
understood.
in T. S. T. E. is not yet
have
to
nucleated
appeared
which
at the interface
inclusion,
matrix
and a non-metallic
Clarke
fine needle-like
unidentified
precipitates
boundaries
of embrittled
conclusive,
and further
austenite
grain
are by no means
are warranted.
and
of an
precipitates
Although these
between the
44
It is,
therefore,
treatment
of large steel
possibility,
the first
castings.
steels
are practical
temper
embrittlement
possible
clear
However, there
contents.
to which this
can be achieved,
of impurity
fracture
effect.
and nitrides,
in
controlling
elements
earth
3.4.1.2
Hot Tearing
Although
hot
included
serious
strictly
than an intergranular
rather
here since
defects
it
encountered
of rareproblems
of RE-oxysulphides which
phenomenon,
it
is
in steel
arising
an interdendritic
speaking,
embrittlement
represents
effects
energies.
is,
tearing
thus negating
but also
forms carbides
the
Consequently,
as carbides.
effectiveness
granular
phosphorus segregation,
relies
not precipitated
solution,
can retard
It has already
castings
(riiddleton,
1966).
45
It
is now generally
solidification
Certain
features
characteristic
is completely
solid.
process have
of the tearing
the
occurs within
(Clyne, 1976).
These are:
i)
The stresses
contraction
to be constant within
(Kondic,
mainly
of the metal,
compositions.
1968).
ii)
originate
the fraction
is large.
solidified
(Bishop, Ackerlind
and Pellini,
1958).
The interdendritic
iii)
the cracking
of a casting
ability
distribution
to withstand
important
in
in determining
the
stresses
1970).
for strain
accommodation may
Mould restraints
(cores,
inserts
of interdendritic
liquid
that
or the inherent
gradient
solidification
is complete.
casting
stresses.
are
the contraction
"hot
a
spot".
generates
which
film
is clear
still
contain
of the
by already solidified,
quicker
cooling
areas.
techniques have been employed to study the
Various experimental
hot tearing
susceptibility,
involves
in aluminium alloys,
cracking
in steel.
is possible
uncracked casting,
studied binary
for a completely
and silicon
observations
an
broken sample.
Shin (1981)
regions
during
but both
of
by Middleton
(1966).
However, it
the effects
elements on cracking
is recognised
of a combination
susceptibility
influence
a quantitative
to the interdendritic
Silicon
clear,
to calculate
method of
of Fe with S, %,
alloys
on hot tearing
alloying
resistance
the ternary
sulphur
of compositional
In addition
3.19).
the effects
effects
(Fig.
shaped casting
method
containing
of
is by no means
interactions
which
47
3.4.2
Effects
Precipitation
failure
be discussed later
in this
being initiated
some of which
section.
granular
decohesion
by
at their
or
by the linking
propagation
the fracture
ductile
manner
by fracture
either
inter-
interface
of the precipitates
the matrix.
with
of these microcracks
Crack
results
in
failure
on a microscopic
scale,
while
of
at the same
of the grain
boundary.
Hondros and McLean (1976) have considered
boundary cohesion is affected
Schematically,
the situation
interfaces
of the metal/metal
3.20, where
and metal/
interface
compared to the
boundary
is
by
cohesion
given
grain
Ys + Yb - Ym_p
Ym p
2Ys - Yb
The term ym
is referred
b*
p*
interfacial
the
of
values
(3.9)
to as the work of adhesion.
Although
48
(1971) measured
the contact
Using their
Y*Fe-Al
anneal.
an equilibrium
after
in iron by examining
203
Yb*
strength
interface
Fe-A1203
the
of
original
grain boundary,
and therefore
fracture
interface.
is likely
of this
tendency of a precipitate
to promote an intergranular
will
low
In general,
to
the
failure
and
it
fail
It
strength.
at stresses
predicted
of cohesion
of the interface
fracture
the strength
is well
up to several
theoretically
can
as a result
stress
concent-
rations.
The concept of a slip
particle
band intersecting
a hard non-deformable
Smith (1966).
a slip
matrix
interface
result
which build
by
up at the head of
or may be sufficient
Such a crack,
favourable
route,
will
which is likely
boundaries.
the
weakened
grain
already
along
follow
to be
49
of intergranular
instances
Some specific
castings
caused by precipitation
3.4.2.1
Aluminium Nitride
fracture
Precipitation
fracture
into
many investigations
now be discussed.
phenomenawill
in steel
most important
failures
continue
discussed in greater
of the mechanism
ways of avoiding
in Chapter 4.
morphology is characterised
facets
coarse
angular
of
which are closely
presence
the as-cast
be
detail
it
Consequently inter-
established.
the fracture
Macroscopically,
cause
castings
in steel
grain boundaries
related
despite
of the casting,
by the
to
the fact
relief
from features
After
graphic
metallic
steels,
could
samples (Fig.
appear dull,
Unlike
the case of
with occasional
show some
bright
reflections
on the surface.
the initial
granular
by Jolivet
observations
fracture
constituents
positive
varied
steel
of metallo-
occurred in aluminium-killed
inter-
(1942) that
and nitrogen
a high
level
and Elsea
contents
(1947).
These authors
of a 0.30%C, 1.6009n
of these elements
in conjunction
50
with
rate increased
a slow cooling
to inter-
the susceptibility
fracture.
granular
from
the steel
separated
In the steels
electrolytically.
containing
of residues
it was possible
in the optical
the austenite
microscope.
grains
to the boundary.
adjacent
Lorig
to observe
failure
transgranular
this
in the fracture
results
though microscopically
series
investigation
in the transmission
extracted
by electron
diffraction,
resulted
reflections
were associated
as A1N
morphologies.
with
in microductile
identified
and
the plates
on the fracture
Wright and
techniques
dendrites,
bright
surface.
3.21.
microscope (TEM).
Quarrell
to the grain
is shown in Fig.
of the fracture
electron
appearance,
has occurred by a
possible
facets
crack propagation
A schematic representation
?'fore detailed
explain
having an intergranular
boundary.
Macroscopically,
failure
occurring
flat,
It
featureless
to the occasional
The dendritic
form
51
-
boundary.
to
the
grain
near
C1965).
Altmami
al
et
work of
the later
(1952) described
Although Lorig
the fracture
by
Wright
Quarrell
and
observed
spacing
(-gum) and these precipitates
in the optical
microscope.
The important
properties
of the matrix,
coincident
with
fine
concept revealed by
the micro-
on the
the boundary.
Sulphide Precipitation
3.4.2.2
aluminium nitride
erbrittlement
this
precipitation,
in
IF
steel
of
commoncause
a)
arm
appear as needles
After
the dendrite
was extremely
would therefore
round
these investigations
to a fracture
as occurring
it
AIN,
of
"needles"
rise
was supported by
This observation
castings,
in several ways.
It is well
steel
Charles 1972,1973).
been
deoxidised
have
which
Type III
(angular)
with
MnS inclusions.
is added or segregation
local
thoroughly
oxygen contents,
If,
(Baker and
steel
may be encountered
(Jackson 1977).
pseudo-intergranular
castings
aluminium contain
however, insufficient
in
Al
to high
Type II MS inclusions
energy quite
fracture
in a casting
significantly.
52
In order to avoid the formation
to ensure that
This provides
of type II NhS, it
sufficient
sulphides.
in
turn result
which
may
aluminium,
of
amounts
in intergranular
fracture
b)
is necessary
Overheating
grain boundaries
austenite
of MnS at the
with
associated
In wrought steels,
of the primary
this
during cooling
normally
sulphides
occurs after
by a high temperature
the dissolution
austenitising
treatment,
effect
castings
after
containing
1975).
(0.5=)
Additionally,
is
solidification
complete.
fracture
and is
casting
a matt intergranular
arrays of fine
particles
equiaxed dimples
of NhS
(Baker and
films
regions
austenite
boundaries.
grain
austenite
region,
contain
interdendritic
to a film
with
On subsequent cooling
with
give
the
through the
secondary sulphides.
Thus, as Fig.
for
the precipitation
of the
53
-
to
transition
Other Sulphides
large intergranular
0.10%Al together
These sulphides
containing
content of 0.31%.
more "shiny".
in appearance to A1N-induced
However, most commercial steel
castings
contain
for this
and
but the
micro section,
on a polished
were similar
is unlikely
casting
fractures
Therefore
low 1
with an abnormally
MnS in a steel
of AMS
the precipitation
to be a problem.
3.4.2.3
failure
in large
steel
castings
instances
which were
attributed
the as-cast
boundaries.
grain
The casting
diesel
engine with
an as-cast
composition
examination
revealed
embrittled
facets)
surfaces
(a dull
diffraction
(Fig.
3.23).
be
to
controlled
process
and knowing the cooling
for a naval
at
similar
Fractographic
background interspersed
shiny
by electron
the precipitation
with
of niobium,
the authors
54
-
calculated
treatment
clearly
impractical
at temperatures
is
1400C
which
or
above
of
on a commercial scale.
the presence of coarse filamentary
fracture
intergranular
on the partially
precipitates
only by
could be redissolved
the precipitate
solution
to be ,.2O00. It
of the precipitate
the thickness
casting
NbC
surface
containing
fracture
rather
as suggested in
interface
of the particle/matrix
of the precipitates.
as a possible
surface
of a 2%Ni-Cr-Mo-V ingot,
42
Cr-Mo-V
in
(1973)
tonne
Spiess
casting.
a
and
case, the precipitate
forms
intergranular
of
other
with
as
Nevertheless,
the effect
3.4.2.5
embrittlement.
and manganese
sulphide
precipitates
impaired as
carboboride
form.
was significant.
reported
In the latter
in a massive plate-like
In neither
seriously
was present
and by Naumann
and
fracture
was investigated
by
55
film
at the prior
containing
0.002-0.006% boron.
intergranular
while
to that associated
by the carboboride
resulted
castings
fracture
the latter
similar
austenite
boundaries
of steel
grain
appearance
the carboboride
having a composition
to have
of
boride
the
and
5-6
elements. replacing Fe in
solution.
In order to minimise the effects
boron
that
since
optimum
contents
was suggested
for hardenability
in
0.001-0.003%
(the
hardenability
the
range
are
purposes
boron) excessive additions
relies
on soluble
effect
be
avoided.
should
and
it
have little
effect
beneficial
56
Chapter 4
in Cast Steels
Aluminium Nitride
4.1
Introduction
The influence
of steel
time,
of this
Since
fracture,
grain
size control,
and a correlation
is now generally
out to
on the mechanisms of
precipitate
a considerable
appreciated
and properties
chemical determination
that
on the structure
of aluminium nitride
available
accepted.
for the observation
and detection
A1N precipitation
with
respect
to the structure
and properties
of cast steels.
4.2
Observation
Detection,
The structure
(similar
and Identification
of aluminium nitride
to ZnO) with
lattice
of A1N
parameters a=b=3.11J,
c=4.99..
dissociates
at pressures
by mineral
products.
below this.
A1N is hydrolised
slowly by
(either
but
the extraction
or for
57
This
the dissolution
involves
(typically
mixture
ester/halogen
residue
by a distillation
Beeghly
that
in steel
to determine
extensively
Woodfine
and Quarrell
attempted
to define
granular
other
factors
technique
Several
and Jackson
of other
being
However,
below which
not
is seriously
in question.
based on this
but soluble
of nitrogen
dissociation
total
temperatures.
calculate
nitride.
(used
nitrogen
in the
in the residue).
As a
a hydrogen extraction
a sample of steel
Other
in the ester-
in the analysis.
but
to IF,
out,
of some predictions
inter-
do many
only
on the susceptibility
halogen solution,
including
authors
used
have an influence
by
claims
by the presence
could be avoided.
fracture
in the
of nitrogen
in this
resulted
(1960)
acetate)
The original
procedure.
elements
alloying
bromine/methyl
by filtration
followed
in an anhydrous
of the matrix
it
nitrides
content of
Knowing the
present and the
is then possible
to
58
the Beeghly method, since it was found that manganese-silicon
in the bromine/methyl
nitride
acetate
solution.
However, in a great number of instances where there is no
interference
and
based on this
correlations
technique.
4.2.2
Techniques
Metallographic
section,
the inability
fine when
to detect
(1960) pointed
out,
in the optical
steel
0.005%N as A1N.
usually
absence.
contents
It
is
of the
be
A1N
that
can
resolved
-0.015%N)
optically.
When viewed unetched and in reflected
in
dark
colour,
grey
appears
using polarised
Lorig
light,
but it
light
aluminium nitride
under which it
is strongly
(1947)
Elsea
and Woodfine and Quarrell
and
of picric
acid in alcohol
when a wetting
that an etchant
zephiran chloride
It was not until
anisotropic.
(1960) found
highlighted
the grain
reagent such as
by
Wright
A1N
was
made
of
observation
and identification
59
in the T. E. M.
This involved
surface of a thin
carbon film
techniques
fracture
Intergranular
fracture
precipitates,
replication.
alcohol.
techniques were
onto the
of 5% bromine in ethyl
used to identify
the deposition
spacings may
in
the AiN.
The development of the SEMwith energy dispersive
also been useful
for
the examination
use as tools
can be identified
probe microanalysis
by its
surfaces
contained
to identify
visible.
on intergranular
analysis
since it
for quantitative
microsections
analysis
little
fractures,
Other Techniques
solution.
of intergranular
has
analysis
availability
requirements
mean that
technique
the method is
used.
A novel technique
ti
for detecting
AIN in steel
castings
devised
was
60
by Steck (1969) who claimed to be able to differentiate
embrittled
by ultrasonic
found that
if
the ultrasonic
It was
testing.
perpendicular
there would be an
of the casting,
attenuation
grain boundaries.
austenite
between
Steck
the presence of
Fracture
is widely
foundry industry
to imply intergranular
the precipitation
of aluminium nitride.
involved
the ambiguities
term will
austenite
in a descriptive
boundaries
will
grain
term of this
kind,
the
had an unusually
magnifications
at the prior
be designated "IF".
A1N as a possible
defective
they
examined
a
when
fracture
caused by
However, because of
in the optical
the original
Lorig
and
cause of intergranular
commercial casting
content.
which
At high
embrittlement
the steel
granular
used within
particles
which appeared to
around which
had occurred.
fracture
Using experimentally
and after
heat treatment
they varied
bending.
0.30%C,
61
to analyse individual
castings
0-281b/ton*)
Increasing
the fractures
(0.40%).
With Al additions
to the precipitation
this
was noted.
decreased.
(1960) attributed
fracture
from
than 20lb/ton
greater
(varied
in an increased
correlation
state precipitation
of %IF with
For a given Al
content,
nitrogen
cooling
the nitrogen
rate,
increasing
both of which
variables
corresponding
likely
to points
to be susceptible
%Nand cooling
of these three
rate).
Compositions
of each curve are
rate represented.
100%
assuming
recovery.
%0.05oA1,
as a guide,
this
lib/ton
62
Lorig
from single
test
"safe"
was quite
layer
of AMNof critical
and Elsea's
A1N thickness
This required
Effect
for different
to fail
(1962) explained
to estimate
the
at various
different
strength)
is low.
strength
Wright
(1962)
temperatures
strength
at room temperature.
failure
more favourable
a relatively
ductile
from
was observed
or were as-cast.
is increased by heat
strength
do
they
than
when the matrix
route
in an intergranular
of the matrix
in terms of the
this
(lower matrix
of the
of Heat Treatment
had
been
those
than
which
normalised
manner
treatment
when a
Al and N levels.
Chapter 3.4).
measurements
an integration
relative
similar
is precipitated
thickness
precipitation
4.3.1
Lorig
good.
continuous
model to predict
the questionable
approximations
total
to be sure of avoiding
Al and N levels
despite
and
curves
They cannot be
results
used to predict
IF.
levels,
and
A transition
to an intergranular
mode corresponding
(higher
a point
fracture
became
the
predominant
cleavage
matrix
strength).
mechanism in the
63
steels.
martensitic
l1lb/ton
containing
was eliminated
at 1260C followed
in fracture
temperature
resulted
established
austenite
being dissolved
Rapid cooling
whilst
grains.
in its
resulted
boundaries.
austenite
assuming that
Harris
but all
general conclusions,
treatment.
temperature.
of this
4.3.2
austenite
that
grain boundaries.
in solid
retention
solution,
This will
for
of the
the solubility
be discussed further
in Section 4.4
Chapter.
Effect
The effects
for
This implied
Clearly
in question,
occurring
IF can be universally
allowed precipitation
slow cooling
solution
to eliminate
IF
containing
treatment
in oil,
treatment
of Chemical Composition
of aluminium and nitrogen
contents
on the susceptibility
64
(1962) examined the influence
of carbon,
manganese, sulphur
fracture
mechanism, whilst
intergranular
that
carbon
fracture
(Section
matrix
failure
and a higher
fracture
strength
fibrous/intergranular
and reduction
Although little
effect
mode. A corresponding
of ductility
and Quarrell's
high
in
quality
whereas
observed.
to a mixed
increase
in tensile
was noted.
on fracture
behaviour,
and Wright
from 0.50%
work resolved
Bessemer steels
effect
influence
had
marked
a
sulphur
researchers
in terms of its
to 2.14 n,
on the susceptibility
properties.
by increasing
frequently
predominates.
strength
C, lower
on matrix
favours
(higher
matrix
tempering temperature)
matrix
low strength
ductile
of
of tempering
in that a relatively
4.3.1),
levels
was encountered.
high in nitrogen)
armour plate
rarely
steels
that
exhibited
IF,
showed that
65
-
a high sulphur
content
intragranular
making
clean,
failure
boundary
grain
void nucleation
titanium
and zirconium
aluminium nitride
nitride
without
rise
giving
aluminium for
additions
in
the presence of aluminium,
even
zirconium.
to replace
IF
The explanation
was
decreases
and
nitrides
and avoid
deoxidation
and
formation
more difficult
more favourable.
correspondingly
In contrast,
were invariably
steels
inclusions
at the sulphide
failure
in the order Zr02, A1203, Ti021 ZrN, TiN, A1N, combined titanium
and aluminium additions
combined zirconium
formation
Baliktay
of Zr021 leaving
that provided
in the
result
the deoxidants
large
foundries
the occurrences
Indeed this
practice
sequence
of these
is adopted in
(Wilson,
1981).
out
in
However, many
66
foundries
smaller
without
for deoxidation
a 'dirty'
steel
in
toughness properties,
to change their
reluctant
results
(Jackson,
practice.
1980).
Lorig and Elsea (1947) and Fremont
effect
attributed
of nitrogen
thus hindering
AMN
precipitation.
The effect
the literature,
refine
it
although
the primary
(unspecified)
quantities
will
strength
ratio,
Alloying
on properties
factors
(Lorig
grain
size
effect
of this
the matrix
matrix
of aluminium nitride
of small
of NbC precipitates.
effect
of niobium,
although other
strength,
in
of IF by the addition
promote IF by decreasing
contribution.
beneficial
will
defined
grain structure
to IF by increasing
matrix
of other alloying
despite
increasing
the
and Elsea,
1947).
the precipitation
tenperature
on the solubility
product.
nature will
be considered
in
67
-
of AIN in Steel
The Solubility
4.4
4.4.1
In Austenite
investigations
Although several
y-iron
of the solubility
(Sieverts
equilibrated
contents
with nitrogen
extension
of AMNin steel
the solubility
nitrogen
Fig. 4.2).
formation
content
of the absolute
content was
up to a critical
(See
rose abruptly.
(Ks) could be
against
The
the reciprocal
temperature
above 1000C.
These
of aluminium-killed
gas at temperatures
the equilibrium
in
of nitrogen
empirical
relationship:
7400
[MRN3
log10
1.95
slopes,
but with
Pickering
have predicted
equations with
(4.1)
(1960)
(1961).
Knig
et
al
and
Thus,
teen.
Irvine,
(1978a)
68
-
equation
(4.1)
represents
an upper limit
log10 Kapp _
into
account,
-6770
T
they predicted
an "apparent
(4.2)
product,
solubility
conditions.
1.03
of equilibrium
(Kapp), given by
product"
solubility
Leslie
et al (1954) in terms of
by Leslie
segregation
This,
is interesting
However, it
investigations,
in certain
derived
_
(4.1)
subsequent
and it
the
has
describes
together-with
their
data
own results
product
for a
given by
(4.3)
+ 1.48
the solubility
been assumed.
the solubility
a "mean" solubility
7500
NA1N.
(1967) collated
[Al][N]
log10
circumstances
0.1%C steel,
all
determinations,
be
that equation
could
available
in overestimations
it
in an
been
shown that
since
Therefore
product,
can result
the Beeghly
in solubility
apparent increase
in measured
that
was considered
of
to the solubility
equations
together
with
69
the relative
containing
for a steel
temperature predicted
solution
It
temperature
by
is
by
200C,
no means obvious when
as
which
as
much
can vary
the data are presented
A more satisfactory
as in Fig. 4.3.
graphically
Fig.
a given temperature.
of a steel
the
at
solubility
aluminium contents
frequently
In Liquid
Steel
state has not been thoroughly
The solubility
investigated,
temperature
austenite
This relates
4.4.2
data is
the solubility
method of presenting
(see Fig.
4.3).
the following
relation
containing
in
0.40%C,
in the range
1550-1750C
CA13M
log10
2.37
+
-88490
Solute Interactions
4.4.3
the solubility
actions.
steel
(4.4)
The effects
elements in austenite
of AIN quite
significantly
on the solubility
or liquid
by solute
of nitrogen
in Fig.
steel
inter-
in liquid
can
70
-
coefficients
The effects
of Al have not
of alloying
are
in liquid
steel
fN is the activity
positive
for N.
coefficient
Elements with
interaction
coefficient
correlation
solubility.
A useful
in situations
is not known.
is an empirical
in liquid
iron
relation
between interaction
and in austenite,
(160000)-0.016
(1000C)=3.1
eNX
eNX
(4.6)
thus:
Temperature of Precipitation
Under isothermal
conditions,
of precipitation
from supersaturated
the precipitation
high
is
temperatures,
slow
at
rate
mediate temperatures
(C-curve behaviour).
there
of AIN
Precipitation
4.5.1
that
parameters of nitrogen
(16000Q
(1200C)=1.9
eN"
eNX
-0.005
4.5
coefficient
solid
of A1N is typical
solutions
in that
the
Schumann and Kunze (1967) , Uda and Pehlke (1974), Maekawa and
(1968),
(1964),
Gomersall
(1959),
Pehlke
Evans and
et al
Nakagawa
Leewis and Maclean (1979), Wada and Pehlke (1978).
71
-
has
been
800C,
be
this
to
since
about
and
at
rate
.
precipitation
by other
confirmed
Wertebach
(1964),
However,
workers
(Wiester
and Hoff
(1958)).
precipitation
phenomena in cast
precipitation
does not
since
castings
Secondly,
steels
cool
usually
(low)
by
them.
ones examined
these elements
present
contents
to 0.10%A1,0.010oN)
of any micro-
effects
exist,
Therefore
place
rate
contents
to
to the
in the amounts of
temperature,
at a correspondingly
cooling.
for
the aluminium
in a casting
and nitrogen
(typically
up
the temperature
This
ignores
also
the
or macro-segregation
in enriched
the solubility
insoluble
conditions,
and nitrogen
to precipitate
to be encountered
likely
Firstly,
two reasons.
any increase
to Fig.
Reference
for
increase
begin
to explain
such results
over several
aluminium
will
Takei et al
under isothermal
slowly
Clearly
during
temperature
steels
of Leslie
similar
to apply
take place
the results
with
higher
et al
would be inappropriate
it
(1957),
the precipitation
temperature
areas.
it
can be expected
that
Kowalowka (1978)
precipitation
suggest
that
As described earlier,
in the liquid
Indeed,
Barron
for
precipitation
region,
(1974)
if
the cooling
and lojecki
and
in the liquid
the precipitation
during
solidification.
form
in
A1N
a
random
of
(1960) to
72
-
why castings
explain
do not
show IF.
4.5.2
Morphology
Precipitate
idiomorphic
in
two
occur
of the optical
to distinguish
clearly
A1N on fracture
(Figs.
and dendrites,
distinguish
to
was made
into
growing
techniques
in the form of
However, no attempt
at the original
surfaces
conditions
under
of the precipitates
have nucleated
had
these
occurred.
of
each
which
power
(1962) resolved
plates
kind,
and appeared to
grain boundaries,
austenitic
a crystallographic
relationship
appeared
asynnnetric, with secondary arms growing from only one side of the
arm.
primary
Thus it
was implied
in
the solid
taking
place
was
to be possible
in certain
annealing
(Bainbridge,
(Stickler
and Vinckier,
the extensive
It
is,
therefore,
dendritic
unclear
precipitates
that precipitation
precipitation
this
during
of small,
typical
arrays
Although
state.
Cu and Ti alloys
in the formation
resulted
that dendritic
isothermal
in steel
ill-defined
dendrites
and not
form.
cooling
the
state,
because this
is the-
73
from steels
experience
higher,
are considerably
of microsegregation,
precipitation
The dendrites
(Stachura,
the fracture
surfaces
(Fig.
like
fractographs
that
arm
the morphology
clearly
merely to result
dendrite
1976).
particles.
precipitates
and
of the austenite
to distinguish
difficult
spacing on
Some of their
to promote
1969,1971,1977).
solidification
grow.
a=
(Edvardson
20-200pm
et al,
of
spacings
orientation
with
4.5).
and together
may be sufficient
this
during solidification,
structure,
to be
temperatures
favourably
may be that
is
orientated
dendritic
there is no clear
distinction
Other PhenomenaAttributable
4.6.1
In a pure metal,
where the grain
temperature.
grain
growth is a thermally
to A1N Precipitation
activated
process
of time and
of 0.03%A1 to steel
increased
74
the temperature
is found with
effect
of A. N.
to the precipitation
temperatures
making it
at higher
less effective
at pinning
Thus Al is frequently
fine
a
promotes
boundaries
in amounts<0.04%oA1
dispersion
to form a fine
4.6.2
4.7),
aluminium a subsequent
and Leslie
Rickett
(Fig.
and zirconium
additions
continued to increase
titanium
This then
the austenite
grain
effectively.
This is normally
in two different
manifest
precipitation
as a cause of both.
(Reynolds and
Gladman, 1979).
Ingot Panel Cracking
4.6.2.1
These longitudinal
steel
ingots
and steels
too frequently
cracks all
during cooling
or on charging
(Nagger, 1975).
Irvine
and Pickering
intergranular,
is
path
crack
boundaries,
and it
of internal
thermal stresses
ingot
appear in Al-treated
the prior
cracking
set up during
A1N
precipitates
at
crack
a
following
is thought that
susceptible
austenite
grain
occurs as a result
the cooling
in the prior
the
austenite
of the
to nucleate
grain
75
boundaries.
pro-eutectoid
network.
of uncracked
of
titanium
temperature
that
temperature
falls
this
within
4.6.2.2
with
identification
case
each
a lowering
or rolling
operations
of hot ductility
structure
in making direct
which transforms
on an austenitic
alloy
role
There will
ductility.
to play an important
able to migrate
obviously
the initial
grain
of the grain
be a critical
boundary
migration
grain
which
size above
to be a function
In
during cooling.
boundaries
and
caused
1979).
hot ductility
observations
forging
by AIN precipitation
likely
and that
the latter
rolled
ductility
Control
to promote good
AiN particle
of precipitate,
is
76
Chapter 5
Experimental
5.1
Work
Introduction
regarding
the AMNprecipitation
phenomena responsible
precipitate
the effects
of T. F. on mechanical properties.
chosen for the experimental
The steel
containing
track
assembly items,
is widely
section
used in industry
strength
castings
and
such as
This alloy
are important
wear resistance
to study
with
I. F. (Lorig
susceptible
and Elsea,
1947;
to cracking
Wright
and
1962).
Quarrell,
10kg induction
Initially,
melted castings
processing
treatment
control
such as pouring
determined.
also
were
solidification
bending.
temperature
Subsequently,
of solidification
The effects
of some
and heat
directional
This facilitated
closer
phenomenon in more
detail.
Quantitative
information
regarding
the effects
of I. F. on
77
-
mechanical properties
and fracture
and non-
steels.
embrittled
Production
All
the steels
of Experimental
melted using
below.
outlined
Practice
Melting
Charpy impact
frequency induction
unit:
furnace.
MgO
Lining:
Base charge:
Alloying
additions:
white iron
(4.2%C)
Si metal
Mn flake
5% N/Mi flake
Al rod (99% purity)
75m square C02/sand moulds, nominal capacity
bbulds :
Exothermic powder:
Melting
details:
when fully
10kg
molten,
the additions
in
that order.
made
were
manganese
of white iron,
silicon
and
casting
by
immersion into
N2/Mn
Al
were
made
of
and
into
after
casting.
the bath.
adding the
buried
and
rate than
78
have been attainable,
would otherwise
formation
casting
of A1N.
The cooling
to a 'Servoscribe'
chart
recorder
Castings were
belting
unit:
Lining:
70kg Birlec
MgO
'Armcol iron billet
Base Charge:
and punchings
As for Practice
Alloying
additions:
Moulds:
details:
As for Practice
a preheated ladle
'A'
Exothermic powder:
Melting
furnace.
'A',
except that
containing
the melt
the Al additions.
the temperature
drop between
molten steel
Melting
unit:
Lining:
furnace located
at SCRATA.
scrap
MgO
Base charge:
Alloying
additions:
White iron,
Al bar C98%Al)
bbulds :
Exotherrii. c powder:
Melting
details:
Foseco 'Ferrux
As for Practice
16'
'B'.
79
-
body
from
the
the
casting
taken
of
samples
Carbon and sulphur
feeder head).
positions
details
were determined by
levels
technique
for analysis
Drillings
content
nitrogen
vacuum fusion
by the Feichtinger
LECO
gas analyser.
a
using
or
at various
out on
analysis
spectrographic
were taken
of the casting
to
of segregation.
of each casting
Table 5.1.
5.4
a)
Heat Treatment
The castings
furnace after
in a muffle
treatments
to typical
were subjected
where necessary.
and sectioning,
commercial heat
to avoid
temper embrittlement.
b)
furnaces
of the surface.
treated
present
by Lorig
to avoid excessive
part
casts were
A1N
determine
the
to
the
whether
was
work
of
be
re-dissolved
could
castings
Q,ua.R2l,
(1960).
(1947)
Woodfine
Elsea
and
and
in embrittled
decarburisation
as reported
80
5.5
Mechanical Testing
5.5.1
Hardness Measurements
Vickers pyramidal
freshly
had
been
samples whose surface
In all
emery paper.
impressions.
three
separate
of
5.5.2
Three-point
In the preliminary
Bend Testing
it
subsequent
occasions
on
some
and
work
fracture
determine
the
to
was necessary
for extensive
Samples of approximately
sample preparation.
as necessary.
by a linishing
After
operation,
castings
testing
machine.
25mmx
and
oxide
the requirement
mode without
Immediately
bending in a
after
fracture,
to await fractographic
examination.
5.5.3
Tensile
Testing
Room temperature
tensile
tests
were carried
(1971)
2
Part
18
BS
using cylindrical
with
cross sectional
servo-hydraulic
testing
out in accordance
samples of 150mm2
5.65vSo on a Dartec
the tensile
control.
samples were
of
porosity.
Low temperature
with an environmental
chamber.
using a
81
fine
spray of liquid
fan.
an electric
to within
nitrogen,
In this
circulated
High temperature
tensile
the chamber by
within
testing
to testing.
out in accordance
was carried
chamber at temperature
Load/extension
to testing.
(measured to within
extensometer.
5.5.4
Impact Testing
castings
prior
to heat treatment.
finish
The
5.1 and it
can be
to allow fracture
effects
In
were minimised.
to
in accordance with
were attained
82
Table '5.2
The media used to obtain
soaking temperatures
Medium
Temperature Range
Liquid
-196C
Nitrogen
-164C to -60C
Isopentane/liquid
20C
to
-60C
Methyl alcohol/solid
20C to 150C
Thermostatically
bath
Air muffle
>150C
nitrogen
C02
controlled
oil
furnace
Clearly
least
in terms of temperature
during
regime
value of impact
the transfer
was the
but in this
control,
importance.
was
of
which
energy
temperature arising
tests
in
specimens, cutting
balance.
accurate
The effects
photographic
% I. F. projected
of density
however, that
this
introduced
the broken
differences
of the
It should be noted,
into
surfaces,
because of this
of surface
relief.
are considered
The inaccuracies
to be small.
83
5.5.5
Toughness Testing
Fracture
condition.
and an uaembrittled
for lhr,
cooled).
were tested
to obtain valid
in an embrittled
were tested
state
size requirements
for this
air
necessary
(Appendix la),
material,
the fracture
displacement
(C. O.D. ).
it was intended to use small keel block castings
Initially,
by Practice
(Section
'B'
fast
of the relatively
5.2) throughout
cooling
keels,
rates
to produce a fully
intergranular
fracture,
46/5-7).
Consequently,
surfaces
at room temperature
Note that
5.2.
colwmar
fully
intergranular
Pre-fatiguing
regions
of the test
servo-hydraulic
chamber.
(Fig.
Testing
testing
5.3).
fracture
condition.
is shown in
(1979)
BS-5762
using an Amsler vibrophore
with
dynamometer.
2t
a
(Casts
The position
Fig.
'C'.
these exhibited
rate,
contents
made
out in accordance
machine fitted
with
machine fitted
This utilised
with
a fine
an environmental
thermostatically,,
84
controlled
spray of liquid
circulated
and a heating
testing,
low temperature
nitrogen
testing.
could be varied
by
to an accuracy
of +3C.
During the tests,
displacement
control
(1980).
Fig.
Crack opening
in
which
in
5.4.
Two simultaneous
(a)
load vs clip
(b)
clip
gauge displacement
gauge displacement
were obtained
By considering
that if
of
plots
(Vl) vs clip
edges.
elastically
loaded regime,
is stationary
V1 vs V2 is obtained.
effective
(V2)
can be seen
or a crack tip
and
5.4) it
knife
the
and
gauge displacement
gauge signals,
by BS 5447)
The result
(as required
opening displacement
and a straight
constitutes
centre of rotation.
This is manifest
line
plot
of
zone
a change in the
as a
85
-
fraction
becomes a larger
of V2 as a result
Significant
the DCG plot
and related
displacement
curve.
on the fracture
By correlating
Metallographic
by grinding,
to calculate
appropriate
in Appendix lb.
Techniques
ammoniumchloride
using a neutral
out in acidic
depositing
higher
concentrations
15%HC1,where it
dendritic
structure
etching
characteristics
Optical
After
of the casting
copper
a layer
solution,
progressively
containing
of copper
into
baths
of HC1, up to
In this way, the
of microsegregated
regions.
Microscopy
features
with
Macroscopic
In order to reveal
5.6.2
on the load/
position
these points
it was possible
5.6.1
to the relative
surface
CODvalues.
5.6
displacement
on successively
of 0.25um.
on the microstructure,
a solution
of 2% Nital
austenite
it
of AMN
by
Lorig
those
suggested
etchants nor
86
(1960) and Mahmoud(1974)
Quarrell
Woodfine
(1947),
Elsea
and
and
highlighted
they
merely
since
was suitable,
features
present
was to hinder
the microstructural
Indeed, the tendency
of the A1N.
observations
enough to be resolved
finish
with a suspension of
to a 0.05um
was to polish
optically
high
in
to
magnification.
unetched
at
examine
water and
y-A1203
The initial
observation
of precipitates
merely by following
be traversed
difficult,
the network
boundary
particles.
of grain
The instrwnent
fitted
Microscopy
Scanning Electron
5.6.3
with
used primarily
examination
backscattered
dispersive
LINK
energy
a
of fracture
electron
of the technique
Transmission
fracture
enhancement were
adopted will
be presented
surfaces.
in Section 6.2.1.
Microscopy
replicas
because
SEM
the
of.
to
work
supplement
surfaces was used
This was
Electron
Examination of extraction
PSEM500
microsections.
5.6.4
system.
surfaces,
Details
analysis
used throughout
A1N precipitates
of this
technique,
by electron
diffraction.
to t,
87
used for the majority
The instrument
EM400T fitted
with
became available.
facilities
A limited
Two-stage extraction
by two methods
replicas.
'Fonnvar'
wetting
the fracture
to be stripped
the film
unit.
The plastic
replica
surface
in an Edwards carbon
small squares,
2mm
x
-2mm
uppermost.
bath
of acetone, the plastic
a
of
period
of several
hours leaving
the
evaporation
layer
a thin
2-3 hours,
After
topography.
A piece of 100um
After
in acetone.
of the fracture
thick
equipment.
just
was dissolved
the carbon
over a
on the
copper grid.
(b)
Direct
carbon extraction.
does result
attack
replicas
of direct
with
the efficient
in a degradation
by the acid.
extraction
extraction
of the fracture
of precipitates,
surface
due to
88
Within
minutes of fracturing,
thirty
20nm thick
of carbon approximately
directly
evaporated
was
a layer
in
surface
operated at a pressure of
unit
10-5 Torr.
'Lacomit'
compound to prevent
stopping-off
extraction.
using a solution
in
methylated
washed
and
water
boundary
from an embrittled
in 2% Nital
and disks
network,
emery paper
perchloric
5.6.5
followed
acid
Electron
5.6.5.1
using
were spark
by mechanically
Probe Microanalysis
from the
wheel.
of the prior
by a ferrite
machined
from
polishing
'Tenupol'
on
of
10%
unit.
(EPMA)
Specimen Preparation
were
11-2nm thick
in a solution
in a Struers
alcohol
taken
the position
by electro-polishing
attempts
a diamond cutting
diameter
in
-3mm
in ethyl
foils
Slices
samples.
revealed
these areas.
surfaces,
in thin
casting
solution
boundaries
grain
austenite
of fracture
of as-cast
regions
in the microscope.
made to observe
for
alcohol
spirit
to the examination
In addition
off
for examination
Etching
2-10 minutes.
were cut
any unwanted
The matrix
grain
in Section
Regions of interest
within
5.6.2
resin
and subjected
89
-
indentation
by
marked
and
on a Leitz
microhardness tester
using
a 400g load.
The samples were then repolished
etchant
finish
the
and
by polishing
5.6.5.2
to remove all
signs of the
was reached
on 0.05}un y -A'203'
Analysis
and an accelerating
of microsegregation
potential
of 15kV.
of Al in the
Prior
to and after
and at the
background
Al count was made.
scan
a
end of each
The count rates of each scan were converted
aluminium using a 'Sheffield
corrects
The instrument
analysis
and fluorescence
effects.
of JUN precipitates
samples.
it was possible
to
Frame Three'
to weight percent
encountered,
counting
Because of the
times of 200s were
-9a5.7
exercise
control
mechanism.
solidification
parameters and to
of solidification
a more detailed
facilitate
(D. S. ) Technique
Solidification
Directional
investigation
resolidified
to obtain
was possible
liquid,
partially
of the steel.
selected
for this
part
and fully
solid
to I. F., and
Cylindrical
extrusion,
of the
75mmsquare castings.
5.7.1
Details
wheel until
it
could be inserted
5mmi. d. which
cement to a 360mmlength
'Autostik'
steel
by
flexible
connected
a
was
which
steel
a brass holder
in the stainless
steel
unit.
By means
is
in
Fig.
the
specimen
assembly
shown
of
view
5.5.
A schematic
91
-
Apparatus
The Solidification
5.7.2
designed by
Eruslu
steel,
stainless
(1981).
Bridge
sequence of austenitic
by Pereira
modified
service
heads providing
A graphite
(see Fig.
To facilitate
stabiliser
In order to
to a minimum, a silica
atmosphere of argon.
25mmo. d.,
a voltage
(1979) and
coolant
and an
of length
susceptor
be
dropped
to
specimens
allowed
under gravity
chosen which
an agitated
releasing
5.7.3
time,
into
the
the supporting
At an appropriate
bottom service
200mm,
slit
along its
to incorporate
a thermocouple.
1.8mm o. d. single
by inserting
bore recrystallised
fired
CC60
alumina
cement
using
sealed
was
found, however, that even with
thermocouples at temperatures
it
into
purpose.
a 5mn
these precautions,
It was
the life
of the
92
owing to attack
the temperature
evaluate
directly
gradients
unsuccessful
coil
of the thermocouples.
induction
hot
the
the
of
zone
of
point
was sufficient
at that
quenching experiments.
for this
to be carried
out
satisfactorily.
In this way
during
the tests
could be calculated
gradient
examinations
metallographic
attained
piece.
Procedure
A Typical
5.7.4
the maximumtemperature
the silica
tube,
the
the system.
drive
specimen
positioned
solid/liquid
at least
so that
the
interface.
slowly
final
input
power
starting
cracking.
of 0.89kIV normally
This heating
lasted
process to a
about an hour.
Before
the run, the specimen was held steady for ten minutes
at temperature
after
After
93
Specimen Examination
5.7.5
In order to obtain
material,
solidified
of 10mmalong their
fracture
surfaces
The resulting
at intervals
a single
fractures
hammer
were
was necessary
of observing
5.8
to adopt
this
AMN in microsections.
Industrial
Examinations
work, several
T. F. and short
foundries
term investigations
visits
personnel,
metallographic
reports
to the foundries
are included
These investigations
examinations
have encountered
in the laboratory.
in Appendices 2 and
castings,
with
and
Two typical
3.
15
3
. r'...
,r
-946
Chapter
Results
6.1
is shown in Fig.
surface
bend testing
slow three-point
Fracture
6.1.
brittle.
scale
appeared
a
macroscopic
sample and on
under a binocular
and occasional
some relief
exhibited
from features
seen arising
For certain
'families'
reflecting
of parallel
orientation
some crystallographic
an observation
which will
Fig.
(Fig.
plate-like
can be seen.
to the light
features
source.
surface,
whole
This suggests
relationship
of the fracture
SEMexamination
to
of the fracture
distributed
evenly
could be
In addition
features
with respect
oriented
facets
6.2 is an optical
Fig.
facet.
to the bright
orientations
specific
reflections
on the surface.
areas
the reflective
strongly
bright
fractograph
When viewed
microscope,
Fracture
oriented
surface
revealed similar
features
each with
surface markings.
micrograph
the
At higher
-95-
Energy dispersive
boundary
in
the
surface.
grain
other
(Fig.
it
hexagonal
the
of
precipitates
as A1N by selected
A1N structure.
in conunercial
been identified
area electron
6.1).
calculated
was excellent,
Similar
features
have also
failures
(see Appendix
fracture
2, Fig.
Fig.
This is manifest
ductility.
parameters
0.5% (Table
to within
generally
brittle,
taken from
{0001}
basal planes
found
to
to
correspond
and were
diffraction,
spacings
replicas
large plate-like
6.6).
to
However, extraction
surface contained
analysis
larger
dimples
the
which
on
shaped
microdendritic
features
plate-like
4).
are
superimposed.
It was impossible
the formation
the plates,
of extraction
electron
diffraction,
well with
precipitates
calculated
were responsible
as with
8).
A1N precipitates
for
replicas
arrays of dendritic
responsible
However, examination
(Fig.
precipitate
(Table 6.2).
for initiating
doubt.
is
beyond
Fig.
SEM
in
the
observed
dendritic
feature
a
electron micrograph of
by
spacings agreed
The fact
that these
the micro-voids
6.8 shows a scanning
on the fracture
surface
96
-
(as-cast)
4176
cast
of
AIN dendrite
extracted
image of an
The dendrite
is
is
Zum,
the
order
of
which
considerably
of
spacing
dendrite
the solidification
dendritic
grain
boundaries
acts
boundaries
result
the exact
position
which
is present
front
decohesion,
electron
fracture
one side
This
in the as-cast
be noted from-Fig.
on some fracture
either
as inclusions
on the fracture
the sulphides
with their
surface
(Fig.
to be heavily
6.11).
faulted
The fact
that
(Fig.
solubility
stage of primary
cooling
of globular
or
by the inclusions
showed
which is consistent
This
state.
product
dispersions
of MnS
of secondary
(see Section
3.4.2.2).
6.12),
grain boundaries
is
nitride
T. E. M. examinations
in the solid
of the decreasing
at the austenite
of an
the plate-like
with
or as holes left
halves
occurs as a result
feature.
It will
were manifest
from
by a mechanism
aluminium
of each plate-like
inclusions.
deviating
of mating
rod-like
to the grain
as shown in Figs.
on only
occasionally
at room
occurs
present
features
The
two-fold.
at an angle
micrographs
surface
20-200M).
occasionally
of the boundaries.
than
smaller
inclusion
lie
which
in the crack
of precipitate/matrix
intergranular
therefore
as a void-initiating
temperatures.
T. F. is
arm
to
in the austenite
region.
However,
97
numerous A1N plates
not
be considered
6.2
and for
contain
on the fracture
were present
to contribute
the sulphides
reason
to the fracture
significantly
cannot
process.
A1N Precipitation
not be resolved
section.
By examining
fracture
several
6.13).
inadequacies
any
in a 'plateau'
region of the
the precipitate
was identified
assume a typical
This represents
20nm thick
A1N thickness
was measured
an upper limit,
similar
Plate-like
is therefore
of -'SOnm(0.051zn).
of the
carbon film
reasonable to
All
the precipitates
since they
contrast.
A1N
The crystallographic
to {000'}AlN
angular relationships
form of MN was
it
since
in overestimates
to be of a comparable thickness,
could
to estimate
was possible
thickness.
exhibited
it
to be 65nm (650).
directly
of intergranular
replicas
This position
of the precipitate
minimum (Fig.
extraction
be seen 'edge-on'.
in a metallographic
when viewed
prominent precipitate
and tilting
thickness
optically
of the precipitates.
for a suitably
replica
surfaces
the thickness
6.2.1
this
which did
surface
of plates
observed
98
-
on a single
and to relate
interplanar
matrix.
the habit
to establish
possible
and therefore
any orientation
cannot be observed at
has transformed.
out using the broken half
from
4210.
impact
Charpy
taken
cast
specimen
a
microscope (Fig.
souce of light
a point
repeating
this
until
a family
under
was provided by
darkened room.
of plates
were plotted
families
of plates
on a stereogram,
and it
The
was in a
angular positions
approximately
Illumination
in an otherwise
away
-2m
and rotated
position
reflecting
6.15).
of
in 'Plasticine'
a binocular
It was
indirect
these to the
By
the relative
was noted
of plates
was
70.
(Fig.
The fracture
was parallel
tilted
until
disappearing
6.16)'and
tilt
surfaces
until
one family
mode.
of plates
This uniquely
defined
of
the direction
99
drive
of tilt
'extinction'
the plate
In this
of the plates.
individual
At first
in Table 6.3.
several
6.19,
in Fig.
projection
sight,
it
families
on a stereographic
is important
fracture
to
comprised
grains,
surface,
of plates
two austenite
of
angles of approximately
arbitrary
to achieve
the direction
situation,
range
The position
Occasionally,
of the
to the features
observed.
This is shown quite
clearly
the linear
discontinuity
represents
the line
The fact
In each case
of intersection
is a single
prior
surface
In Fig.
surface.
line
the
across
of the grains,
has arisen
indicating
terminating
on either
at the discontinuity.
of the
observed is continuous
of intersection
feature
the
case,
the austenite
austenite
this
that this
fracture
in Figs.
that in
growing into
surface.
of
can be concluded
grains
100
-
half
the
mating
are
on
which
of the fracture
Therefore
of angular
there
which
five
families
that
the angles
{111}
1,3
for
angles
(70.53
y
in the SEMare estimated
it
it was possible
involved
between them.
grains
(Fig.
6.22).
the reasons
noted
planes
AIN plates
Similar
surfaces
to their
measurements
confirmed
the
angular relationship.
the atomic
orientations
the austenite
foil
the examination
simultaneously
to be 710 + 1.
to confirm
earlier.
surface,
the sample
and rotating
occurrence of this
{lll}Y
measurement was
10C)01JAIN //
the
to the
parallel
on the fracture
of disappearing
that
as in Appendix 4.
It
68 and 76
until
frequent
seen
which intersected
The plate
is
to obtain
it
can be concluded
6.3a)
the
the austenite
The errors
planes.
(Table
2,3
plates
and 109.47)
grow into
plates
By dividing
in austenite
{0001}
two groups
between plates
and 700.
into
of plates
to each other.
angle
in Table 6.1
relationships
of AIN into
to the growth
corresponding
surface.
grains
within
the
TEM specimens
of foils
for
taken
101
-
(Fig.
boundary,
6.24).
ferrite
pro-eutectoid
The austenite
during cooling
and no orientation
to
relationship
could be inferred.
AiN
Dendritic
6.2.2
Solidification
6.2.2.1
the maximumtemperature
attained
position
microscope.
solidification
quite
Fig.
clearly
solidus,
so the interface
solid
finally
At low magnifications,
the fractures
in
were similar
porosity
prior
to quenching,
intergranular
an
gave
austenite
during quenching
an interdendritic
Some central
fully
6.26),
recognisable.
both cases.
larger
section
arising
(4382) casts.
of
in the optical
(Fig.
the
sample
of
revealed the
observations
of the liquidus
the dendrites
process,
approximately
Work
fracture
grain boundaries.
(Fig.
6.27).
the fracture
transformed
around ferrite
was fibrous,
and
to ferrite
(Fig.
6.28)
102
The main areas of interest
the partially
for
solid
evidence
region
of A1N precipitation.
numerous type
(Fig.
regions
6.29)
but with
fracture
intergranular
6.2.2.2
surfaces
fracture
of extraction
Fig.
for
replicas
dendrite
the
of
arms.
observed
example,
Fig.
on
6.8).
of
and dendrites
of Processing Variables
Contents
condition
an order of magnitude
A1N present
the plates
with
6.3.1
arm spacing of
are continuous,
Effects
6.30)
6.3
4383
surface
AIN plates.
to suggest
Observations
Metallographic
The examination
in the
(Fig.
surfaces
of A1N dendrites
(see,
4382
inclusions
The dendrite
dendrite
that
agreement with
reasonable
fracture
smaller
no evidence
dendritic
in Al.
from
NhS precipitates
the precipitates
fractures
used in this
of castings
fracture
investigation,
morphology
showing that
103
-
increasing
cooled
below which
-1.5
(Practice
of 0.1C sec-1,
at a rate
instance corresponding
I. F. will
not
3 (comparing
x 10
occur
'A'),
corresponds
increased cooling
Li
value
as high
of
the susceptible
suggests that
4.1) it
made by
only 50% I. F.
cooling
rate.
safety,
further
be remembered that
aluminium levels
their
to I. F. decreases with
the results
[%N]
as 3.7 x 10-3.
the critical
well within
of their
to a value
with
[%A1]
rate.
level
the critical
casts
Practice
to
cooling
[%u]
a constant
(in this
practice
of halving
It should
to the Al
refer
50%will
be expected.
axis
graph.
The effects
of Al micro-segregation
had
4210
which
a nominal Al content of 0.17%.
on cast
shows the micro-hardness
the probe.
interdendritic
Fig.
ratio
6.32
core.
of Cmax/Cmin = 1.19.
104
Carbon Content
6.3.2
the carbon
Increasing
75uunsquare
of three
content
4353,4354
At a level
of a 0.30%C steel.
to that
exhibited
of the grain
the size
Fig.
This
6.33).
boundary
corresponds
behaviour
morphology.
intergranular
and similar
intergranular
a fully
was fully
resulted
fracture
fracture
facets
but
surface,
still
in this
case
(see
directly
: 0.50%C to solidification
to 0.42%,
castings
at carbon
to austenite
contents
at higher
carbon
levels.
results
austenite
is not
contained
IF.
Pouring Temperature
The pouring
effect
steels)
process,
and still
pearlitic
(which
for hypoeutectoid
the precipitation
of a ferrite
grain boundaries
influencing
the y-oa,transition'
temperature
fracture
the
on
embrittled
0.30C-1.5OMn steel
1700C
1620C
15500C,
and
corresponding
of
120C and 200C respectively.
was fully
intergranular
etched sections
differences
After
in as-cast
the fracture
grain
structure.
temperatures
to superheats of 50C,
heat treatment,
of
of macro-
revealed no discernable
105
Heat Treatment
6.3.4
(a)
hardness
treatments
are presented
In the as-cast
after
6.34.
The close
annealing
of different
The results
were
which
the fracture
the fractures
became intergranular.
It
hardness levels
on impact properties
will
be presented
A1N as reported
by Lorig
times at 600C.
treatments
were
shown in
of I. F. by redissolving
and after
heat treatment
was
in Section 6.4.2.3.
but after
heat
fracture
various
be seen.
Charpy
by
tempering
samples for various
also examined
Fig.
Results
being ductile.
The effect
subjected
I. F.
surfaces
between
association
(b)
of matrix
of the casting,
can clearly
failure
tempering or normalising,
fracture
The fracture
various
out after
section
cross
structure
state,
carried
in Table 6.5.
a full
'reconstruct'
is shown in Fig.
facets
bend tests
point
for
on the susceptibility
and microstructure
used to
the fracture
have
been
facets
attributed
which
shiny
fracture
surface
of either
cast.
remained constant,
the
and the
106
Examination of the fracture
more dull.
surfaces
in dissolving
precipitates
with
coarsening of the
The dendritic
morphology (Fig.
failure
features
associated
the ductile
features
difference.
(Fig.
6.36),
whilst
the plate-like
by void nucleation.
Hence although
of the fracture
surface
the precipitates
in
E.
P.
M.
A.
be
the
analysed
and could
aluminium and nitrogen
ratio
of 2: 1.
(1.93: 1).
silicon
could now
Using this
(Fig.
technique,
6.38)
both
detected
had
and
an approximate weight
were
The corresponding
ratio
manganese,
found
in
the nitride.
was
or phosphorus
microsections,
in some detail,
electron
techniques highlighted
dispersive
analysis
as shown in Fig.
enhancement
and energy
107
6.4
Tensile
6.4.1
tensile
two states
of I. F. on the tensile
properties
in the
ductility
falling
the tensile
with
The specification
higher
tensile
both
condition
sets
Ma content
heat treatments.
in manganese contents
of results
of cast
heats (see
strength.
were,
however,
the 0.2% P. S.
within
of BS 3100 AS (1976).
ductility
identical
The higher
5.1).
temperature.
in tensile
strength
The temperature
and
dependence
is similar
failures,
significantly
with
the earlier
fracture
steel.
46/4
46/1
UTS
than
and
after
casts
and
with
in the embrittled
grade of steel
be noted that
further
It will
to its
requires
Table
The effect
steel
steel
to 12% reduction
of an embrittled
properties
increasing
observations
temperature.
(Section
This is in agreement
6.1) that
intergranular
AMNinclusions
at the position
and growth at
of the
rior
108
-
boundaries.
grain
austenite
to the microstructure
with respect
strength
will
of the matrix.
strength
in excess of 200C
fracture
Typical
failure.
modes of
surfaces
6.41.
of T. F. on Inpact Properties
The Effect
6.4.2.1
of 1. F. on impact properties
The effect
be seen in
can clearly
and embrittled
from ductile
at high temperatures
failures
respectively
in
WQ;
castings
(Fig.
to fibrous
transition
Impact Testing
6.4.2
Figs.
to a partial
to cleavage failures
temperatures.
the upper shelf
fibrous
at lower
different
(Fig.
6.43).
At low temperatures
to fibrous
in a fully
failures,
intergranular
mechanism.
behaviour,
increasing
fracture,
the observations
of promoting
the temperature
resulted
then a mixed I. F. /
lower energy fracture
of Wright
109
-
in Fig.
However, by increasing
3.1.
further,
still
a second transition
excess of this
fibrous
the testing
In
the fracture
temperature,
temperature
energy similar
was attained.
The effect
results
Fig.
in Fig.
markedly
quite
6.44 which
However,
it
a least
be noted
will
of Testing
Effect
In order to investigate
that
region
in fractures
only
the impact
where
below
without
embrittled
casting
Charpy specimens.
this
At room temperature
failed
6.45).
down
to a temperature
encountered
became one of cleavage.
in a ductile
This is similar
material.
By reducing
regime was
The fracture
mechanism
fall
energy
of
the transitions
a less severely
temperatures,
temperature
of the
plot
Temperature
fully
more
mechanisms
manner with
squares
the specified
fracture
is
is shown
energy
obtained
6.43.
6.4.2.2
of T. F. on the impact
of the presence
failures,
transition
surfaces
with
decreasing
temperature
from fully
F. to almost fully
to fully
I. F.
cleavage.
110
of the broken
SEM examinations
test
revealed
pieces
the following
characteristics.
i)
fracture
In the fibrous
region,
features
occasional
6.46a).
the dendritic
with
coarse dendritic
structure
of the casting.
6.46b).
casting.
failures,
of normal fibrous
inclusions
is identical
to that
of
appearance in certain
adverse effects
intergranular
fracture
scanning electron
instance.
As the testing
macromechanism of failure
micrographs of intergranular
regions of the
areas.
ii)
and it
in the dendritic
which results
at MnS inclusions,
appearance is considered to be
density
the greater
had
Failure
per se,
facets
from samples
temperature
At the higher
of the intergranular
Figs.
associated
fracture
with
I. F.
appearance
6.47b).
The
proceeding
boundaries.
grain
for short
distances
austenite
some of the
with
111
-
features
plate-like
typical
can still
be resolved.
At temperatures below -164C, the fracture
iii)
predominantly
transgranular
fracture
surface.
6.4.2.3
The Effect'of
Matrix
and Fig.
cleavage,
mode was
Hardness
The effect
of matrix
examined.
transition
surfaces
The impact
6.49, and optical
by I. F. at room temperature,
treated
lhr,
was also
hardness
susceptible
6.50.
to fail
the phenomenon
temperatures.
evidence of any I. F.
This is concordant
with
the observations
isochronal
tempering treatments
for
susceptibility
6.4.3
Fracture
T. F. on matrix
The results
hardness.
Toughness Testire
of c, i,
of the CODtests
carried
in
6.8
Tables
6.11.
to
are given
out at different
temperatures
e, di,
6u and 6max
Values of
112
-
The material
Low nitrogen,
: Low aluminium,
Low nitrogen,
Normalised.
Normalised.
to allow
the full
behaviour
transition
sufficient
samples were
to be examined.
for comparison
purposes.
Comparison of Tables 6.8 and 6.9 reveals
an interesting
behaviour,
the initiation
steel.
does
of maximum load (6
in overall
to I. F. ) and LLQT
samples.
difference
max)
it
of a 'critical'
value of the
there is no ambiguity
in determining
the critical
The difference
with
reference
behaviour
can
fracture
surfaces
shown in Figs.
113
Fig.
to suggest
slow crack
After
steel.
curve
initiation
bursts
no evidence
deformation,
a slow
Since
a maximum
as the
progresses.
for
identical
almost
to that
growth.
of slow crack
limited
with
with
force plateau
Fig.
and continues
is carried
front
crack
associated
amount of plastic
a small
initiated
is
crack
the test
brittle,
of -100C
to failure.
growth prior
the behaviour
6.54 is
by all
at temperatures
and normalised)
is macroscopically
below.
and
Fig.
exhibited
amount of crack
along
grain
6.54 up to the
Subsequently,
however,
fracture
observed
This
after
in sharp
proceeds
boundaries.
in load
decreases
the discontinuous
shown in Fig.
propagation,
the embrittled
gives
rise
to
the attainment
after
load.
um
m=im
of
At first
initiation
of I. F.
sight,
However, examination
austenite
fatigue
oriented
is not sensitive
of the fracture
in a fibrous
samples (Fig.
initiated
it
therefore,
boundaries
grain
embrittled
surfaces
of embrittled
has been
cases, fracture
respect
in the castings.
is unlikely
to end exactly
the
to the presence
fatigue
the
of
crack tip
that
crack.
localised
Because of this,
the
favourably
a
at
fibrous
boundary,
some
and
grain
crack growth
114
has to take place
Fig.
manner.
region
6.57 is
of ductile
fatigue
crack
manner,
the crack
the original
focussing
before
tip.
crack
conditions
failure
a scanning
fibrous
growth
over
This
micrograph
immediately
to propagate
had to cross
plane.
electron
crack
In order
in an intergranular
can proceed
showing a
ahead of the
in an intergranular
to a plane
corresponds
to a change in
6.57.
the
115
Chapter
Discussion
'. 1
Introduction
work have provided
The results
of this
information
fracture
process.
in heat treatment,
caused by variations
amount of
surface
a considerable
of effects
and testing
composition
conditions.
This chapter considers
fracture
intergranular
proceeds,
The effects
form.
precipitates
discussed in Section
mechanical properties
is considered
the influence
in Section
environment,
variables
significance
are
of I. F. on
7.5.
out in a laboratory
of some of the results
is highlighted.
7.2
The Mechanism of I. F.
have confirmed
The results
grain boundaries
primary
fracture.
crack propagation
microstructure
is actually
which exists
merely follows
to delineate
is important
it
of AIM on the
the precipitation
I. F. occurs,
front
that
to remember that
trans granular
with
respect
the original
boundaries
to the
The crack
which continue
formed.
they
on which
Hence
116
-
it
to find
is not surprising
depend to a certain
the micromechanisms of I. F.
that
of the
extent
matrix.
The mechanism proposed
and in broad
occurred
through
boundary,
location
of the boundary
into
provided
jagged
constant'
The results
to the grain
in a longitudinal
section
at a 'fairly
boundary.
have
the
work
enabled this
present
of
microscopy (unavailable
proposed
such
to the dendritic
in the grain
to lie
side.
for
These he attributed
surface.
at either
justification
steps
from
grains
some experimental
when he observed
the fracture
the austenite
deviated
but
to follow
3.21
fracture
that
was suggested
of the grain
(1962)
a theory
It
correct.
which projected
Wright
in the region
the precise
(sic)
terms is
by Lorig
to these earlier
workers)
has
by
indeed
Wright
the
that
are
steps
observed
at several
shown
well-defined
boundary
(Section
the
to
angles
grain
However, as Figs.
the features
6.2.1).
arise not
form of the
orientation
relationship.
The general mechanism of I. F. is,
crack front
broadly
follows
therefore,
the position
of the prior
deviates
austenite
form of AlN,
encounters
117
plate-like
of A1N.
precipitates
fracture
steel
transition
usually
phase particles,
In embrittled
occurs
as a result
the dendritic
exact
of decohesion
(Fig.
grain
at the interface
(Figs.
void
of preferential
of the prior
second
or oxides.
A1N precipitates
position
in Section
sulphides
however,
steel,
temperature
by void nucleation
fails
At temperatures above
the ductile/brittle
and the
nucleation
6.4).
and growth
Deviations
boundaries
occurs
of the plate-like
regime, I. F.
This
from the
as a result
A1N precipitate
situation
was considered
3.4.2.
is reflected
intergranular
fracture
surface
material
features
characteristic
Wright
grain
from the
unfavourable.
of the nitride,
by areas
the fracture
at similar
defined.
matrix
of embrittled
temperatures.
clearly
at
regions,
therefore,
the plate-like
form
for the
surface.
118
grain boundary and matrix
it
is possible
observed
to explain
to I. F. to cleavage
with
decreasing
If we consider
it
transitions,
fracture
'intergranular'
of the embrittled
the strength
the classic
to brittle
the yield
strength
to include
aIF which
a
to
refers
grain boundaries.
prior
of aIF with
strength
may be predicted.
conceptual
by comparing
at any temperature
strength
ductile
normal
temperature,
temperature.
in Figs.
the susceptibility
4.3.1).
to I. F. (Section
in determining
strengths
The variation
to that of
both
DBTT,
the
since
are governed by the ease of void
ay above
nucleation
'intergranular'
Qy is low, fibrous
second transition
falls
the temperature
mode of failure,
failures
to fibrous
At low
failures
fracture
to an
predominate.
strength
strength
(See Fig.
involved
7.1).
in
increase
boundary
tend
to
the
aIF
which
grain
along
there will
the fractographs
stress.
yield
7.1
in a transition
results
whilst
Fig.
at a given temperature.
Increasing
intergranular
6.40).
strength
temperatures,
is low.
(Fig.
temperature
6.45.
it
is to be expected
which is verified
by
119
-
be a continuous
from fibrous,
range of fracture
mechanisms
cleavage to cleavage.
Fig.
several
to again in latersections.
be referred
of the 'intergranular'
to Fig.
strength
the
In
be
will
interval
Clearly
material,
embrittled
of this
curve relative
heavily
of the results
be an
In this
fracture
takes place.
The hardness and condition
also affect
the relative
be changed.
relative
right
7.3
The results
of different
of the strength
intergranular
strength,
out on material
carried
positions
vs temperature
increasing
interval
matrix
strength
This
and cleavage
matrix
hardness (Fig.
6.49)
in Fig.
of a casting will
curves in Fig.
strength
of heat treatment
This corresponds to a
curve upwards and to the
AMNPrecipitation
7.2.
has
been
process
120
-
the temperature
precipitation
and directional
is effectively
when it
Precipitation
stage of primary
data available
cooling,
a steel
Al and N contents
and it will
to the solubility
this
the austenite
The temperature
limit
may well
lever
is appropriate
Details
rule
lie
phase field.
of
in iron.
For higher
The concentration
at which precipitation
may be calculated
The latter
These
9).
4.4).
containing
be recognised
the Al and N.
state
solution
diffusion
grain boundaries.
ANN
liquid
stage of solidification
to the as-cast
Dendritic
If we consider
observations
can precipitate
will
observations
(Fig.
site
as a nucleation
outside
at a late
confined
7.3.1
of the plate-like
at a later
The metallographic
solidification
from solute-enriched
respectively
for nitrogen
(Scheik,
in view of its
of the calculation
1945)
rapid
are given in
121
-
For initial
limit.
precipitation
precipitation
it
x=0.001,
to begin
for
liquid
treatment
a rigorous
the kinetics
also
will
of the residual
Fig.
Col
with
composition
Although
to consider
process,
7.2.
of Al and N, precipitation
concentrations
become possible
it
in Fig.
are plotted
of the
for
a starting
be possible
should
for
when solidification
70% complete.
with
the residual
coefficients
during solidification.
liquid
both
N
Al
are
and
positive,
with
of carbon
local
increase
solubility
by Valencia
higher
at a still
of nitrogen
temperature.
and experimentally
blowhole formation.
any
These effects
Dendritic
(Table 4.2),
confirming
stages of
solidification.
The limitations
segregation
residual
predict
but it
are recognised,
90% solid,
approximately
Beyond this
point,
liquid
is considered that up to
increases
to model Al micro-
asymptotically
some AN precipitation
solidification.
equation
accurate.
Al content
in the
stages of
122
-
with relatively
of macrosegregation
is not difficult
it
may exhibit
excessive.
Foundries producing
castings
still
with a temperature
gradient
A]N morphology.
of dendritic
precipitation
1981).
A1N precipitates
the driving
that
be the concentration
as a function
liquid
This will
parallel
dendrites,
of the solidification
is likely
it
interface.
(Wilson,
of the dendritic
although
remains uncertain,
dendritic
mechanism of formation
The precise
of 0.013%.
levels
are not
of the distance
also be coupled
to the direction
which will
further
An analogous situation
silicate
gradient
inclusions
of growth
favour a
is the
in iron-nickel-
of directional
solidification
silicon
alloys
studies
during solidification,
the microsegregation
the driving
enriched
solidification
eventually
dendrites
it
force in this
case being
of oxygen.
in the interdendritic
solute-
dendrite.
As solidification
proceeds it will
Uhlmann et al (1964)
123
have studied
different
in several
(1972)
the "pushing"
organic
observed,
below which
a further
sufficiently
liquid
If
was
the cooling
but if
be less likelihood
solid.
of the effect
of cooling
rate is
of A1N in the
the precipitation
in the growing
explanation
for
I.
F.
tendency
the
rate on
high,
dendrites
the particles
in steel.
examined by Uhlmann, a
of the solidification
velocity
growth
inclusions
case of silica
type of particle
interfaces
materials
critical
by liquid-solid
of particles
such precipitation
does
of the precipitates
being
interface
and eventually
Plate-like
A]N
nature of the plate-like
The crystallographic
the adjacent
during primary
austenite
in the austenite
of the casting
and grow
an orientation
relation
and examination
packed
<10I0>AIN//
<110>. (Fig.
these directions,
7.3).
and whilst
interface
a coherent
within
grains with
{111}Y.
(0001)//
form
the
of
within
cooling
nucleate
which were
is -5% misfit,
perpendicular
[0001]
//
of 6.5% along
accepted threshold
for
<111>1 directions.
in the
why
124
are so thin,
the precipitates
interface
the incoherent
(thickness)
in the [0001]
AN
estimated thickness
direction
of M500, this
cells
thick
With an
(Section
are
6.2).
orientation
in a 0.20C-1.40Ni
steel
relationship
[1120}AlN //
{I10}
[0001]MN//
was
Y.
containing
in thin
with
precipitates
and had an
transformation
The preferential
of MN
of isothermal
of the form
growth direction
of the rods
was determined by
studies
of the A1N/martensite
foils.
({111}Y //
acicular
diffraction
relationship
is not favoured.
electron
be
established
can
which
relationship
is often
<111>a, ) this
relationship,
orientation
was transformed
which is therefore
indirect.
orientation
and austenite
relationship
between an h. c. p.
//
//
<110>1.
2C
2C
The atomic arrangements on the (0001) Nb // (111). planes are shown
2C
in Fig. 7.4(a) and it can be seen that there is good matching of
Mo and Fe atoms when the close packed directions
However, if
kind,
Fig.
of this
strain
of the austenite
125
would be necessary to accommodate the A1N. With the
lattice
relationship
orientation
ANN
the
unit
of
volune
excess
to be positioned
7.4
is incorporated
cell
(0001)AN plane,
by allowing
at inter-atomic
as in Fig.
sites
7.3.
on the Susceptibility
of Processing
Variables
Contents
to I. F.
7.4.1
It
is now well
of a casting
contents
a given
used in this
levels
[%Al]
such that
it
7.2,
Fig.
It
of Al and N required
[%N]
-1.5
If
at this
level
However,
cooling
rate
Al and N contents
is important
the kinetics
will
this
to remember that
occur at this
necessarily
size,
be susceptible
microstructure
important
role.
is
-1
sec
compared with
of Al and N, A1N
is more than 50%
process
why I. F. is
avoided
level.
in Section
limit
temperature.
that precipitation
to I. F.
Other factors
7.3.1
is
will
the fact
Nbreover,
A1N precipitation
casting will
this
explain
inferred
be
not
should
It
of 0.1C
of the precipitation
probably
below
castings
to cause I. F. were
when solidification
at a rate
and nitrogen
to I. F. at
the susceptibility
is predicted
completed.
the aluminium
x 10-3.
precipitation
at this
increase
will
study
'critical'
the
for
rate.
cooling
increasing
that
established
that
mean that a
such as the grain
it
should be
126
the incidence
to minimise
possible
there
content
2.1.1
in Sections
but
and 2.2.2,
for
This
precipitation
(i. e. not
condition
before
limit
A]N
A1203)
the
to
solubility
exceed
as
cbmbined
can occur.
been
a given nitrogen
Al in solution
has to be sufficient
control
have already
Sources of nitrogen
of Al and N contents.
discussed
I. F. by careful
of
can be satisfied
AIN
in two
ways:
(i)
by the addition
In small castings,
of excessive amounts of Al
deoxidation
for full
and the
and final
practice
required.
of commercial failures
from several
foundries,
be
totally
to
considered
The failures
superfluous.
in
reported
case this
ladle
content of
to the T. F.
a nitrogen
for
both
to
the observed
these
account
analyses
were
unable
since
incidence
(ii)
of I. F.
In larger
castings
segregation
susceptible
to I. F.
This is particularly
are rendered
of
large castings
It
macro-
an addition
slow.
of
127
-
titanium
the Ti/Zr
whilst
additions
without
deoxidation
after
T. F.
prevent pinholing
The reluctant
attitudes
7.4.2
By increasing
the carbon
6.33)
eutectoid
composition
the prior
austenite
Hence it
is possible
network
fracture
behaviour
increasing
I. F. still
that
is no ferrite
when there
grain
boundaries
to discount
during
network
primary
the theory
(Wolf,
1980).
Fig.
that
fracture
to solidification
composition.
Few experimental
the peritectic
transformation
cooling.
the presence
for
in a finer
grain structure
fragmentation
than in higher
directly
data exist
to aus tenite
regarding
larger
above this
the effect
of
carbon alloys,
with a
of
intergranular
This coincides
surface.
solidification
formed at
on the intergranular
has
it
even at the
occurs
a ferrite
that
content
and this
less
solidification
(1973) have shown that the size of the columnar region also
decreases as the carbon content of the melt is increased.
128
-
content will
increasing
the matrix
the carbon
to T. F. by
strength
1962).
is shown in Fig.
7.4.3
coefficients
effect
of AlN precipitates
and Quarrell,
have confirmed
that
the larger
significantly
Any increase
of grain
even with
6.3.3).
been shown to have quite
to I. F. (Lorig
1960).
The results
a slow cooling
(100mm square)
and Elsea,
a marked
1947;
of the present
tends
rate
castings
keel
block
25mm
castings,
square and
explanation
per unit
on the susceptibility
Woodfine
to I. F. in
(Section
200C
of
superheat
rate
on the susceptibility
The cooling
in
extensively
since
is formed.
Neither
effect
the
Pickering
thereby increasing
precipitation
The effect
T. F. is by
to promote
exhibited
I. F.,
I. F. at
(Table 6.4).
work
75mm
One possible
7.3.1.
129
-
the cooling
fixed
usually
already
imperative
determine
of the cooling
of small
are these
of the casting,
to contain macro-segregates.
thermal
slowly
it
castings
There is,
bars which
concerns
used to
are often
must be
It
of a casting.
likely
to be cooled
but
is
however,
and that
effect,
has
It
stresses.
cooled
rate
and considerations
significantly
unlikely
tend to reduce
the susceptibility
must be treated
test
properties
not only
faster
cast-on
the mechanical
remembered that
of the casting
to avoid
the relevance
excessive
in large,
that
implication
another
size
is
rate of a casting
with
The present work has, however, shown ways in which any susceptibility
to I. F. may be emphasised by other means in order to take such
factors
for
into
For example, it
account.
(see Sections
6.3.4,7.2
tempered test
the casting
state
test
fibrous
should be carried
and 7.4.4).
fracture
Moreover, if
the
at room temperature,
a
since
6.45.
Heat Treatment
The effect
of relative
matrix
been
in
Section
noted
already
It
is important
has
to realise
that
of heat treatment
it
-
or as-quenched
130
condition,
cleavage
in pearlite
I. F. will
tempered
occur by a fibrous
the fact
at temperatures
fracture
[Al]
13000C.
In steels
in this
[N]
x
solubility
lower
containing
and Woodfine
product
of only
of a 0.17%oAl-0.017%N
and that
(Fig.
5x
claimed
implications
virtually
and burning
may be
the reason,
of using
preclude
dangers
of overheating
added
it
strength.
and
a reduction
in
industry.
method
4.4) which
10-4 at
at 1250C, but
fracture
the
by water quenching
(1962)
treating
is considered
temperatures
to redissolve
and Quarrell
in
by
the matrix
changes
masked
it
treatment
the
data available
an
(1947)
may
to be inadequate,
of up to 13000C followed
intergranular.
remains
predicts
Elsea
however,
the solubility
annealed
fracture
merely results
is
and
A]N precipitates
steel
6.34),
the steel
cases,
one of
no T. F. is observed.
The results
(Fig.
strength
are likely
properties
that
if
Similarly,
mechanism.
mechanical
resulting
mechanism is often
respectively
or martensite
be observed.
rarely
or extensively
despite
fracture
(Section
rates
the use of
there are the
3.4.2.2).
131
7.5
The Effect
The results
of
Properties
T. F. on Mechanical
in
intergranular
the
which
presence
of
an
ways
several
of A1N can affect
conditions
important
particularly
embrittlement
7.5.1
mechanical properties.
test
of the specific
in determining
the extent
to which
may be detected.
Tensile
Properties
in a deterioration
elongation
of the embrittled
would be expected.
these properties
ductile
for
40%
R/A
of
values
pronounced the larger
indicates
The variation
of the casting
in tensile
Therefore,
that
of the matrix
'intergranular'
respect
becomes more
(Fig.
fracture
to the microstructure
even if
in relation
a tensile
with
fracture
6.40).
is
temperature
strength
Bearing
actually
result
may be significantly
properties
and
material.
piece.
in
fractures.
the properties
grain
largely
will
axis,
as
these properties
orientation
test,
tensile
of ductility
and reduction
to which I. F. affects
The extent
network
indicate
on the yield
transgranular
with
this
is
132
not unexpected, since the strength
on the ease of void nucleation
this
in the ductile
(in
temperature is increased,
As the testing
regime depends
at MnS inclusions
favourable,
geometrical
considerations
fracture
is reached when it
for fracture
grain boundaries,
becomes preferable
'trans granular'
a truly
involved
to proceed in
7.2.
on the fracture
of temperature
behaviour
been
discussed
has
in
Section
already
specimens
is that instead
observation
to mixed I. F. /fibrous
failures
as reported
transition
the relative
In less severely
transition
increases
gradually
with
(1960)
The
of the matrix
embrittled
from cleavage
failures,
The main
in two transitions.
of impact
7.2.
of a simple transition
lower temperature
In this
a temperature
Impact Properties
The effects
(Fig.
in
steels,
as shown
in terms of
increasing
difference
is
large
there
not
a
case
and intragranular
strengths
over a relatively
7.2).
133
of I. F. on the impact
The effect
that
6.43 is
of Fig.
region
increasing
impact
shown in Fig.
6.44,
83 -
can be seen
and it
in a decrease
E (in J)
energy
relation
0.685 x(%I. F. ).
was still
-15J.
discussed in Section
proportions
features
parallel
on the fracture
boundaries will
the
surface.
of temperature within
there
region,
of I. F. and fibrous
some micro-ductility.
of results
energy
is the mechanism of I. F.
in
to significant
This effect
fracture
occurred
but inevitably
to the grain
variations
in %I. F.
of matrix
shown in Figs.
Increasing
interval
energy.
The fractographs
temperatures
have been
exhibits
in Fig.
6.50
times of
investigated.
This corresponds to
- 134 -
it
behaviour
of the matrix
(Fig.
boundaries,
grain
of the matrix
and finally
contracted,
(Fig.
and I. F. is observed
7.6(b))
so that
tempering
after
time
for
7.1,
the yield
of the
over a range
reduces
the
is
the I. F. regime
8 hours,
it
disappears
7.6(c)).
Fracture
7.5.3
7.5.3.1
Toughness
COD for
Crack Initiation
position
not until
of the properties
(Fig.
The
localised
of the embrittled
6.57).
and
of
crack coincides
It
is
to
of A14 precipitates,
be representative
6.51).
a line
(i)
of
AIN precipitates,
exactly
(Fig.
grain boundaries.
with
temperatures.
is thought to arise
of the fatigue
unembrittled
results
(Si)
of the CODtest
the conventionally
will
tempered material
the tempering
(Fig.
energy of -60J.
7.6(a))
Increasing
of temperatures.
strength
is high
model in Fig.
the strength
with
in the lightly
strength
Finally
above 50C.
had almost
can
135
This highlights
testing
should be emphasised,
extension
invalidate
for
found difficulties
tip
the HAZ.
within
high
specificity
have also
explain
crack
Gittos
The crack
tip
been cited
observed
anomalies
zone (HAZ)
in locating
the fatigue
positioned
toughness
to
(1979)
was correctly
by Ritchie
during
of T. E.
and Dolby
values
example
growth prior
erroneously
Another
to the presence
Similarly,
in measuring
of crack
by Berry
steel
toughness
in only
by a test.
of slow ductile
failure.
intergranular
toughness
since
a temper embrittled
crack
the micro-mechanisms
data generated
the numerical
in fracture
arises
gave
of crack tip
et al
(1976)
to
4340
of AISI
testing
steel.
COD at Maximum Load (Smax)
7.5.3.2
Fig.
(S)
quite
governed by necking
is largely
6
max
the sample after
the initiation
and is
sensitive
therefore
have little
dependent
is
measured
crack
tip,
intergranular
This
in the uncracked
to the presence
ductility.
is because
ligament
growth
(Knott,
of
1973c)
of I. F. in much the
Fatigue
location
crack
the value
significantly.
of slow crack
influence
being
the sample.
of I. F. lowers
the presence
from the
some distance
under displacement
by rapid
area of
control,
bursts
ahead of the
136
-
front
crack
main
load-bearing
5
om.
after
initiation.
it will
been initiated
propagate rapidly
to
involved
in choosing a 'critical'
design
have
for
been outlined
COD
the
purposes
of
is Sc, which
1980).
more pessimistic
are considerably
with
to service
regard to crack-tip
discussion
application
consideratirnswhich
geometrical
bend-test
will
underestimate
successfully
These
ductility
as to which
(Knott,
value
in Appendix lb.
figure
which
failure.
catastrophic
7.5.3.3
of load control
apply in service,
usually
cross-sectional
In contrast,
This will
1973c).
justifying
from a
continued use.
1973c),
137
-
problem of I. F., it
appears
conservative
to incorporate
of I. F.
mode of failure
any
In normal circumstances,
di,
cannot be tolerated.
mean that an
138
Chapter
Conclusions
8.1
The precipitation
on the as-cast
of aluminium nitride
castings.
8.2
is not,
results
high
bulk
with
a
nitrogen
coupled
aluminium
also exacerbated by a slow cooling
macrosegregation
form of A1N.
The latter
grows into
For a cooling
section.
in the optical
{111}Y.
of the A1N
the A1N can
in a metallographic
to detect
testing
(0001)A//
the thickness
rarely
the austenite
<110>y.
is approximately
precipitates
8.5
<1010>A//
of
precipitation
grains on either
solute-enriched
for
subsequent solid-state
nucleus
act
as
a
may
a plate-like
At high
stages of solidification
liquid.
the
in two morphologies.
dendritic
In large castings,
rate.
temperatures
of
It is
content.
in steel
IF usually
AIN-induced
fracture
grain
and embrittled
steels
a full
transition
from
of
139
-
to fibrous
cleavage to intergranular
failures
fracture
temperature.
transgranular
fracture
inclusion
seen on
of decohesion at
interface.
facets often
surface.
the A1N/matrix
8.6
oriented
crystallographically
the fracture
Here,
acts as a void-initiating
AMNis responsible
reflecting
however,
the dendritic
the
by areas of cleavage.
the intergranular
are to some
At low temperatures
properties.
precipitates
path is usually
present at the
time of testing,
increasing
with
to
boundaries.
8.7
intergranular
energy
fracture.
region
8.8
of the curve:
Initiation
little
showed
steels
despite
condition,
intergranular
of
amount
E (in
to the presence
sensitive
is
5O h steel
an empirical
energy
observed
studied
the overall
in
because
all
was
in
relationship
and the
Joules)
= 83 - 0.685x(%I.
F. ).
of
between embrittled
change in fracture
(Si)
and unembrittled
morphology.
This
temperature,
fast
140
-
intergranular
fracture
crack.
were significantly
max)
than for the unembrittled.
Heat treatment
fast cooling
impractical
be
to
considered
rates required
crack growth
castings
is
and
reprecipitation.
8.10
The precipitation
deoxidation
after
the addition
of a small
Results obtained
should be treated
levels
with caution.
of segregation
Differences
in cooling
for
I. F.
rate and
Acknowledgements
I am most grateful
G. J.
Professor
Davies
and encouragement
Science
Trade Association
during
and co-operation
of this
the course
and Steel
of numerous people,
exception.
and friends
at the University,
contributions.
like
on the interest
and this
to thank all
my colleagues
I would like
Kate Croft,
this
a special
thesis
to
three years by
Finally,
and to the
of funds.
help
the
given to me over the last
acknowledge
Beech, Martin Bridge,
guidance
Research and
I would therefore
'Bill'
their
work,
Castings
for
Research Council
own personal
Dr. A. R. Entwisle,
to my supervisors,
Kevin Selby,
my parents.
much faster
it.
REFERENCES
Allen,
A. H. (1879), JISI,
Altmann,
P.,
Aritomi,
N and Gunji
et al
11,480.
(1965),
K. (1979),
4,20.
Res.,
App. Mat.
ISIJ,
Trans.
19,152.
Mag., 14,1157.
D. Phil.
B. G. (1972),
Bainbridge,
(1979),
Thesis, Lhiv.
Chico. Acta,
Anal.
of Sussex.
107,339.
Baker,
A. A.,
Baker,
T. J.
and Charles,
J. A.
(1972),
JISI,
210,702.
Baker,
T. J.
and Charles,
J. A.
(1973),
JISI,
211,187.
Baker,
T. J.
and Harrison,
Baker,
T. N. (1962),
Baliktay,
et al
S. (1976),
Nature,
196,566.
Dr-ing
Dissertation,
Banerji,
S. K. and Briant,
Banerji.
S. K.,
et al
W. D. (1975),
2,201.
thiversity
(1980),
C. L.
(1978),
Met. Tech.
of Berlin.
Met. Trans.
18,169.
9A, 237.
Berry,
G. and Brook,
Bibby,
P. A.
Bibby,
P. A. and Beech, J.
Bishop.
Blake,
H. F.,
(1972),
et al
PhD Thesis,
Trans.
P. D. and Jordan,
11,933.
of Sheffield.
Lhiversity
(1973),
(1958),
J. of Fracture,
Int.
211,290.
JISI,
M. F. (1971),
JISI,
209,197.
Soc.
AIME,
239,216.
biet.
C.
(1967),
Trans.
M.
Flemings,
T.
F.
Bower,
and
Branmmar,I. S., et al (1959),
Briant,
C. L. and Banerji,
T. S. I. Special
S. K. (1978),
Int.
Briant,
C. L. and Banerji,
Briant,
C. L. and Banerji,
S. K. (1979b) ibid,
10A, 1729.
Briant,
C. L. and Banerji,
S. K. (1979c) ibid,
10A, 1151.
Bridge,
M. R. (1981),
PhD Thesis,
10A, 123.
of Sheffield.
University
Technology
Bridge, M. R. and Beech, J. (1980), 'Solidification
in the Foundry and Casthouse", Paper 73, Metals Society, London.
(To be published).
siech. 5,55.
Carney, D. J.
(1953),
'Gases in Metals',
Clyne, T. W. (1976),
G. J.
Cottrell,
Cottrell,
A. (1975a),
'An Introduction
Cottrell,
A. (1975b),
ibid,
Cox, T. B. (1973),
Croft,
Crussard,
I.
28,139.
of Cambridge.
British
Foundryman, 68,238.
Min. Notall.
to :Metallurgy',
Petrol.
Engineers,
212,192.
Carnegie-MSellon University
and Chojecki,
Przeglad Odlewnictwa,
p. 414.
PhD Thesis,
N. H., Telejko,
%Setals, 3,255.
University
(1975),
Ohio, 118,69.
of Phase Transformations',
Inst.
ASM Cleveland,
A. (1979),
183,146.
R. W. (1953),
'Physical
Chemistry of Metals',
PhD Thesis,
Desai, S. C. (1959),
JISI,
of Pittsburgh.
Int.
191,250.
(1951).
England.
p. 372,
El-Soudani,
PhD Thesis,
M. N. (1976),
(1964), JISI,
PhD Thesis,
Fast, J. D. (1965),
of Sheffield.
'Interaction
Flemings, M. C. (1974),
204,32.
University
R. D. (1964),
of Cambridge.
University
202,32.
3,798.
Processing',
'Solidification
1, )Macmillan, London.
McGraw Hill,
G. D. and Davies, R. J.
Gibson, S. (1979),
Gittos,
(1978),
B. S. C. Technical
(1956),
Gilman, J. J.
10,205.
Slevarenstvi,
G. D. (1979),
Funell,
London, p. 104.
Funnell,
\Iet.
Tech. 5,150.
Note PROD/PMi/12/79.
Scand. Jnl.
F. B. (1967), JISI,
9, (6),
205,653.
Hahn, G. T.,
et al (1959),
'Conference
University
on Fracture',
Hannerz, N. E. (1968),
H=erz,
on Mechanical
Halley,
22.
of Niet. 1,247.
N. E.
`letal
(1968),
et
al
I.
Science Journal,
JISI,
206,68.
2,148.
of Sheffield.
Wiley,
I. I. T. p. 91.
C. D. (1962),
R. G. and Chandley,
Harris,
J.
Harrison,
D. (1980),
A. J.
Heckler,
Hellawell,
J. A. (1969),
and Peterson,
P. M. (1962),
A. and Herbert,
Herzberg,
Materials',
R. W. (1976), 'Deformation
Wiley, Ch. 7.
Holt, J.,
Sheffield,
et al (1971),
Paper 1.
Trans.
Met.
Proc.
and Fracture
Monograph No. 2,
Holt, J.
Sheffield,
(1971),
W.
M.
Hubbard,
and
Paper No. 5.
Hondros,
187,219.
of Engineering
Mechanics
SCRATA,
E. D. and Stuart,
'Electric
Conference',
Colloques
Internationeaux
de CRNS,
L. E. H. (1968),
Phil.
Mag. 17,711.
Honer,
K. E. and Baliktay,
S. (1978a),
Giesserei
Honer,
K. E. and Baliktay,
S. (1978b),
ibid,
30,83.
S. (1978c),
ibid,
30,153.
SCRATA,
117th Annual
245,2537.
Soc. AIbE,
Hondros,
SCRATA,
Proceedings',
Conference
Annual
'20th
41,97.
12,415.
Construction,
Metal
Haynes, F. G. (1974),
Paper 11.
Sheffield,
Modern Castings,
Forschung,
30,53.
Ichise,
Irvine,
K. J.
Irvine,
K. J.,
and Pickering,
et al
(1967),
ISIJ,
11,535.
F. B. (1957),
JISI,
Iron
and Steel,
30,219.
205,161.
Jackson,
R. P. (1978),
Jackson,
W. J.
(1979),
SCRATAJournal
Jackson,
W. J.
(1975),
bbnograph
Private
Report
No. 4,
236,149.
'Gases in Steel',
4030.
SCRATA, Sheffield.
W. J.
Jackson,
W. J. and Bradshaw,
Jackson,
W. J.
Jolivet,
H. (1942),
Kameda, J.
Communication
Private
Jackson,
and Wright,
(1970),
J.
Rev. Met.
39,233.
and McMahon, C. J.
(1980),
Knott,
J. F. (1973b),
ibid,
Ch. 7.
Knott,
J. F. (1973c),
ibid,
Ch. 6.
Knott,
J.
Kondic,
Knig,
Private
'Metallurgical
V. (1968),
P. Scholz,
W. and Ulmer,
Met. Tech.
Met. Trans.
Communication
P. (1962),
Principles
H. (1961),
4,425.
11A, 91.
Buttenaorths,
Nbdern Casting,
27, p. 469.
Leger,
Canadian Met.
B.
(1979),
Fonderie,
Lement, B. S.,
et al
(1954),
Trans.
ASM, 46,851.
W. C.,
et al
(1954),
Trans.
ASM, 46,1470.
Leslie,
Quarterly,
Lorig,
Low, J. R. (1959),
p. 68.
'Symposium on Relation
of Properties
McMahon, C. J. (1975),
Rouge, Bolton Landing,
18,333.
ASMM,44,30.
C. H. (1952),
Low, J. R. (1954),
AS<M,p. 163.
and Fracture
385,19.
Lorig,
Trans.
London, p. 49.
32,541.
Eisenhttenwes,
Leewis,
of Cambridge.
Arnold,
of Founding',
Arch.
11,11.
of Research,
Knott, J. F. (1973a),
London, Ch. 8.
F. (1981),
from SCRATA.
SCRATAJnl.
C. (1977),
J.
of Steelmaking in Relation
'Grain
p. 525.
Boundaries
to Microstructure',
Wiley,
in Engineering
Swampscott, Mass-S,
Materials',
Baton
(1974),
S. F. S. A. Project
Marshall,
S. and Chipman, J.
Matasova,
Mayrhofer,
M. (173),
btehrebian,
et al
Tetsu
to Hagane, 45,255.
(1942),
ASM, 30,695.
Trans.
Neue Htte,
(1970),
Ohio.
18,430.
Monatshefte,
120,312.
1,1209.
Met. Trans.
Mulford,
7A, 1269.
3,2225.
Research Inst.
for Metals,
Paranjpe,
Inst.
Engs. Shipbuilders
R. D. and Elliott,
0. J.
Pereira,
(1979),
(1958),
Petch,
N. J.
Pfann,
W. G. (1952),
F. (1960),
J.
PhD Thesis,
Phil.
Trans.
et al (1960),
Plateau,
J.,
Puttick,
K. E. (1950), Phil.
Scot.
89,165.
175,52.
Trans.
University
AIMS, 218,1088.
of Sheffield.
Mag. 3,1089.
AIMME, 194,747.
SemeColl.
de Met. Corrosion,
p. 185.
Mag. 4,964.
Ann., 155,437.
19,26.
R. E. (1972),
'Physical
New York, p. 553.
204,349.
Metallurgy
Principles',
Van Nostrand-
40,39.
R. L. and Leslie,
Ritchie,
R. 0.,
et al
H. C. (1960),
Rogers,
Sakagami,
Scheil,
R.,
(1942),
E.
(1969),
et al
W. C. (1957),
(1976),
Trans.
'Hot Working
Met. Treatment,
Met. Trans.
24,59.
7A, 831.
218,498.
AIIE,
Tetsu
to Hagane, 55,550.
34,70.
Z. Metallkunde,
rr
Schenck,
H.,
et al
(1958),
Arch.
Eisenhuttenwes,
Schenck,
H.,
et al
(1959),
ibid,
30,533.
Schenck,
H.,
et al
(1963),
Stahl
und Eisen,
29,673.
83,93.
41,585.
13,307.
Selby,
K. (1977),
SCRATAJ.
Selby,
K. (1979),
Selby,
K. and Danson, P. J.
Shin,
Y. K. (1981),
Sidey,
of Research,
(1977),
PhD Thesis,
M. P. (1967a),
Sidey, M. P. (1967b),
38,12.
SCRATAReport
Lhiversity
Iron
and Steel,
ibid,
40,269.
Sieverts,
A. (1929),
Z. Metallkunde,
Sieverts,
A. (1931),
Z. ffr
Sieverts,
A., et al (1938),
No. 1872.
of Sheffield.
40,168.
21,37.
168A, 19.
Basis of Yield
and Fracture',
Sci. J. 1,56.
Smith, E. (1966),
Oxford, p. 36.
Inst.
Southin,
Speith,
'Physical
Stachura,
of Metals,
11,333.
19,403.
Stachura,
S. (1971),
Stachura,
Stachura,
Poland.
S. (1980),
Przeglad Odleivnictwa,
21,233.
2?, 490.
Private
of Czestochowa,
of Steel
Stephenson, S. D. (1974),
Stroh,
A. C1961), Acta.
R. and Vinckier,
Stickler,
A. N. (1957),
%tet. 9,898.
Takei,
P. J.
D. G. and'Nielia,
T.,
C. F. (1949),
81,37.
P. F. (1976),
Nbtallurgia,
Scripta
\Iet.
10,205.
39,133.
R. D. (1974),
J. Appl.
Walker, J. L. (1958),
'Liquid
H. J.,
T. C. and Elliott,
Wilson,
F. G. (1971),
JISI,
of Sheffield.
Eng. Fract.
Mech. 4,25.
ASM, Cleveland,
78,736.
164,182.
Wilder,
20,292.
Phys. 35,2986.
H. (1958),
T. (1972)
R. D. (1978),
Res. Bulletin,
et al (1964),
(1970), Mtetallurgia,
J. F. (1960),
209,126.
77,7/73-
J. Electrochem.
Soc. 107,628.
p. 319.
Wilson,
Wirth,
F. G. (1981), Private
A. and Clarke,
Wolf, M. (1980),
Private
J. A. and Quarrell,
Wright,
J. A. (1962),
A. G. (1960),
A. G. (1962),
PhD Thesis,
University
Trans.
JISI,
ibid,
195,409.
200,299.
of Sheffield.
ISIJ,
4,25.
Laboratories.
APPENDICES
-Al-
APPENDIX1
Fracture
la.
Sample size
BS 5447 (1977)
the .crack
(KIC)
2.5
cry
Toughness Testing
requirements
that
specifies
(a)
length
for
valid
for
a valid
Initially,
the test
of the material
(preferably
an over-estimate)
To take into
account uncertainties
under the
be
related
can
of the test
BS 5447 further
criteria,
via a table.
such as underestimation
not meeting
recommends that
Therefore,
is
in equation
ay
370NNm 2,
the
the
(l a. 2)
B>4
this
of
for selection
(Ziyy) 2
for
than
dimensions
should be based on either
piece
An estimate
The ratio
criterion
less
(la. l)
of test.
or
be not
conditions
ii)
both
KIC measurement,
(B) shall
0.2%
is
the
proof stress
ay
where
i)
KTC measurements
370
= 0.42m
-A2-
i. e.
With a typical
thickness
B=
420mm.
to width ratio
a valid
of 0.5,
KTC result
of CODValues
Nomenclature
Symbol
Term
Test piece
Notch width
Effective
Distance
thickness
crack length
of clip
gauge location
from test
piece
surface
force
Pf
Fatigue pre-cracking
Stress intensity
coefficient
Stress intensity
factor
Applied
ay
Young's
Poisson's
Additionally,
force
Nbdulus
ratio
the following
fracture
in
the
events
(see Fig. Al. l)
(compliance function)
suffices
process,
to P, V and S
-A3Event
Suffix
fracture
Onset of unstable
brittle
or an arrested
crack.
slow
crack growth.
i
Initiation
max
Point of first
Onset of unstable
attainment
fracture
or an arrested
brittle
ii)
of a tCriticalt
Event
where unstable
fracture
Definition
For situations
prior
growth,
slow crack
is
process
of affairs
clearly
the critical
at low temperatures,
takes
event
by dc.
represented
in the Fracture
This
place
Process
without
in the fracture
is
the normal
as shown schematically
state
in
fracture
the critical
either
i,
of a maximumforce plateau
or the attainment
event
Su or
in the fracture
m,
(Figs.
process
Al. l(b)
collapse,
value.
and (c)).
by
in
a structure
growth
crack
displacement.
may be represented
If not,
6max as a critical
-A4Calculation
iii)
of COD Values
will
load vs.
clip
tested
steel
gauge displacement
of the fracture
photograph
length
the crack
of
gauge 1 (Vl)
surface
traces
plotted
clip
at room temperature
vs.
An enlarged
measurements of
Ca).
to testing.
first
double
in
the
of
slope
clip
change
This clip
displacement
The equations
towards the
gauge plot
the
translated
of
general yielding
of initiation
The point
region of this
By constructing
curve,
(Vp)i,
it was
gauge
due
S=
2QE
y
where
K=
Y
and
of a/W.
0.4
(W - a) Vp
0.4W + 0.6a
YP/BWI
(lb. 1)
+Z
(lb. 2)
-AS
Hence for
sample 46/1D,
a=
20.08nn
B=
20.12mm
W=
40.00mm
is
the calculation
(measured on fracture
measured prior
as follows:
surface)
to testing
N=2.52mm
',
BS 5762 (1979).
ay
P.
= 23800 N
(Vp)
--
BWI
in equation
1997.52
6=
i2x
Si
(lb. 2)
10.68 x 23800
20.12 x (40.00)2'
Y_
'.
A1.2.
0.185mm
from equation
K
tests).
348 x 207571
3/2
1997.5 Nmm
0.4
E=
207570, v=0.3
(40.00
20.08)
-
()x
0.4 x 40) + (0.6
and Z=3.6m
x 0.185
20.08) + 3.6
= 0.072mm
Similar
calculations
significant
points
Cl
fit'
CO
LU
Z
U. i
4-i .
vi
&0
Gg
%
J
cu
,
41
U
-H
"
o-0
au
d OVOI
C)
4-1
i
LM
C) b
cu
2+ c3 0
,.
30
20
PMU
tp.
P
(kN)
10
u5iu1.5
Fig.
A1.2
2.0
Vl (mm)
Load/clip
gauge displacement
46/iD at room temperature.
0.5
Vs(mm)
for
curve
COD sample
crack
initiation
0.25
025
Fig. Al. 3
0.50
V2(mm)
0.75
2.5
-A6APPENDIX 2
Director:
Castings
Steel
Research
and
Trade
Association
la
Your reference:
Our reference:
29th February,
1980
to
Foundry 'A'
Investigation
into
the Fracture
of a Mill
Housing
by
N. H. Croft
Introduction
The aim of this investigation
was to determine the cause of
failure of a large mill housing which had fractured in a coarse interfracture of cast steels has frequently
granular manner. Intergranular
been associated with the precipitation
of aluminium nitride
on the
primary (as-cast) grain boundaries (Refs. 1-5), but this is by no means
the only possible cause. Other factors which may result in failure of
this kind are the presence of a ferrite
network, extreme Type II
inclusions,
manganese sulphide
or small internal hot tears, all of which
favour preferential
crack propagation along the grain boundaries.
Chemical Analysis
C%
0.35
Si%
0.36
Mn$
1.11
P%
S%
0.022
0.033
Cr%
0.06
Mo%
<0.02
Ni%
0.08
Al%
(total)
0.053
Hardness
HV30 = 174 +3 in the as-received
condition.
Cu%
0.05
N%
(total)
0.018
S2
-A7Microscopical
Examination
9).
Discussion
grain
boundaries
during
primary
cooling
of the casting.
(-0.01%).
temperature
Use titanium,
as reported by Woodfine (Ref. 3), in addition
to aluminium to form the more stable TiN which does not
in
forms
massive
at the grain boundaries.
precipitate
Conclusions
fracture of the mill housing has
The coarse intergranular
boundary
from
the
of
a
grain
presence
network of aluminium
resulted
during
primary cooling of the casting, and probably
precipitated
nitride
in the temperature range 1100C-700C.
References
and A. R. Elsea.
1.
C. H. Lorig
2.
3.
4.
S.
M. p. Sidey.
6.
J. I. S. I.
J. I. S. I.
(1947).
195,409
200,299
(1960).
(1962).
(1967).
J. I. S. I.
205,653
(1967).
A9
-
Fig.
fractured
Macroscopic view of the freshly
bending.
broken by slow three-point
Fig.
Microstructure
from a section
taken near the fracture
fine equiaxed ferrite
and pearlite.
surface,
revealing
Mag X75
Etch:
2% Nital
surface,
A10
-
Fig.
Low-power
fractured
scanning
surface
electron
revealing
micrograph
of
"Rock
typical
a freshly
Candy" features.
Mag X80
Fig.
Scanning electron
micrograph showing the system
of platelets
at higher magnification.
Mag X320
All
-
`
''
`
i
;.
/
*
Fig.
Scanning electron
micrograph showing needle-like
extending beyond the root of the crack.
precipitates
Mag X320
A12
-
AWA.,
i.
I
if
. ,.
Fig.
Transmission
electron
micrograph of a direct
carbon
extraction
replica
of the fracture
surface,
showing
heavily
fragmented
the
plate of aluminium nitride.
Mag X22000
Y,
"f
,Y
L
+'t
}
'
,!
Fig.
Transmission
electron
micrograph showing the
aluminium nitride
plate in more detail.
Mag X36000
A1.
)
-
t.
f
. `.
46 "..
Fig.
Transmission
electron
micrograph of a direct
carbon
fracture
the
The
surface.
of
replica
extraction
form of the precipitate
dendritic
be seen.
can clearly
Mag X28000
,: 1'
1
.r
M,.
Fig.
Transmission
micrograph
electron
showing the continuous
nature of the dendritic
and plate-like
precipitates.
Mag X5900
U
0
O
a,
I-
0
O
0
z
U
QZ
OR
U,
OO
U
0
0ocoC000o
0
N
Co
r'
0
r'
of
I"
N0
r-
Co
e-
(wdd) N3DOa1IN
00N
A14
APPENDIX 3
Director:
Steel
Castings
Research
and
Association
trade
Registered Office:
Your reference:
Our reference:
5 EAST BANK
24th June,
to
Foundry
'B'
SHEFFIELD
S2 3PT
1980
ROAD,
134
on
Cracking of a 0.35%C 'Spider'
Casting
by
N. H. Croft
Introduction
Severe cracking problems have been encountered in the
These
region of the feeder head of a 0.35%C, 0.7%Ma spider casting.
in nature, and slow bend tests
cracks appeared to be intergranular
performed on samples taken from the casting revealed small areas of
faceting.
Moreover, chemical analyses carried out at
intergranular
the foundry implied a pick-up of aluminium near to the feeder head
(0.11%Al compared to a ladle analysis of 0.06%), suggesting JUN
as a possible cause of the cracking.
precipitation
The casting had a finished weight of approximately 8 tonnes,
having been made from a 16 tonne electric
arc heat. This was the
fifteenth
and was the first
casting in a batch of fifteen,
one to
exhibit cracking.
Chemical Analysis
The results
C
of analyses carried
Si
Mn
0.34
0.69
0.011
0.34
0.69
0.011
Mo
0.016
0.24
0.05
0.016
0.25
0.05
pS
Ni
Al
A15
-
In addition,
the AIN contents had been determined by the
Beeghly method and were found to be:
oAIN
%N as A1N
Ladle
0.0017
0.0006
Head
0.016
0.005
Si
Head
0.36
Bulk
0.38
MetalloeraDhic
Cr
0.010
0.016
0.23
0.011
0.015 --0.23
Ma
0.32
0.66
0.32
0.67
Nb
Ni
Al
0.06
0.17
0.11
0.06
0.17
0.12
Examination
bending,
A16
Macroscopic and microscopic
have shown the cracking
examinations
from excessive aluminium nitride
to be intergranular,
resulting
Fig. 7 shows solubility
at the as-cast grain boundaries.
precipitation
in austenite(l),
data for aluminium and nitrogen
and it can be seen
2.
3.
4.
The apparent discrepancy between the AUN content in the ladle and
in the product arises from the rapid cooling of the ladle sample,
form.
A1N
does
time
to
the
The valid
precipitate
give
not
which
analysis is the one taken from the finished casting, i. e. 0.016%A1N.
Reference
1.
N. H. Croft.
Fracture.
Fracture Mechanisms in Cast Steels - Intergranular
SCRATAProgress Report No. 2012,12th March, 1980.
A17
-
t
)y
Fig.
Macro-etched
intergranular
section
path.
through
a crack,
showing the
Mag X0.75
--
________
Vv,
4`
-".
, lam
iJ.
fi'r'
O.r
IOF
jp
-'d.
Fig.
. -Wir'~r
"6. I''z
J
i...! rr
decarburisation
the
Optical
showing
micrograph
is
The
fine
ferrite
the
matrix
cracks.
with
210Nital
Etch:
...,..
iF
associated
and pearlite.
Mag X40
A18
-
Fig.
Fracture
cracks.
`,
4:
.`;
Fig.
`s,
}I
A19
-
Fig.
Fig.
Scanning
fracture
electron
micrograph showing the main mode of
during slow three point bending, one of cleavage.
Mag X160
N
6
co
17
C5
ca
N
r
O
J
Q
W
J
m
r
CJ
0
to
o
Co
0
ca
0
6
t
0
'.......,
I=
101 1 iw
-A20-
APPENDIX 4
'Extinctions
The Measurement of
in the SEM
Angles
thder
before
until
tilt
the plates
circumstances
(see Section
were rotated
as
appeared horizontal
on the viewing
screen
as much as possible.
The additional
angle
they
tilted
were then
tilt,
these
disappear
always possible
6.2.1).
surfaces,
restrictions
was not
fracture
disappear
a, required
and
of
as follows:
of maximum tilt,
In the position
(wl).
measured
the
was
viewing screen
on
By tilting
back
shown schematically
to calculate
possible
increased
This is
a.
and sin
sin a=W
w2
ww
(a +
sin
sill
sina
wl
sina
=
hence
a=
and this
tan-1
+ cos a sill
a cos
cos
+ cot a sin
sin
W21
cos
tilt
was added to the angle of maximmun
'extinction'
angle.
to obtain
the
-A21-
Wz
W7
Max.filt -p
lilt
Maximum
Fig. A4.1
screen of
B'
A
AA'= w,
BEY
= wz
S.E.M.
detector
Fig. A4.2
BA
Geometrical relationships
angles of tilt.
positionof max.tilt
extinction position
A22
Appendix
Calculation
of the Microsegregation
Al and N during
in Section
As noted
during
2.4.2
can begin
Characteristics
of
Solidification
solute
redistribution
This
results
in the residual
liquid
solidification.
and N content
for
occurs
increases
of Al
of A1N
and precipitation
limit
in local
usually
A1N in liquid
is
steel
exceeded.
data used in these
The solubility
in Section
presented
is
for
(1978a)
The limit
4.4.2.
therefore
-8490
T
due to
which were
in Fig.
of solubility
7.2
equation
+ 2.37
model, it
insensitive
are relatively
are those
calculations
to slight
errors
of
these temperatures.
The local
concentrations
out using
C11 = C
in
equation
as
The equilibrium
was taken
for increasing
fractions
in
equation'
liquid
(fs)
solid
For Al,
this
was
the form
kAl -1
(1 - fs)
2.2 of Section
partition
2.4.2.
coefficient
as 0.6 as determined
of aluminium
by Tiller2
in 6-ferrite
and Oeters
(kAl)
was
and
et a13,
-A23-
during solidification.
which
does not
case,
is
an interstitial
apply,
since
CL was calculated
rl
CL = Co
alloying
back diffusion
rapid
using
element,
the equilibrium
the Scheil
can occur.
lever
In
rule.
-1
(1
kN)
fs]
-
7.2.
solubility
CLl x CL
at which
these
line
the value
of
gives
curves
vs
cross
fs as shown in
the maximum
References:
Z. Metallkunde,
1.
E. Scheil,
2.
W. A. Tiller,
3.
F. Deters
4.
J. Chipman,
5.
C. E. Sims, Electric
J. I. S. I.,
et al,
Arch.
Physical
1942,34,70.
1959,192,338.
Eisenhuttenwes,
Chemistry
1969,40,603.
of Steelmaking,
AIN,, E (1951),
p.
632.
TABLES
Table 2.1
See Text,
Page
Table 2.2
Nitrogen
of different
contents
steelmaking
routes
(Wright,
Nitrogen
Method of Manufacture
Basic Open Hearth
0.004-0.001'*
Basic Electric
0.004-0.010*
Arc
L-D
0.008-0.011+
<0.005*
Blown
02
Enriched
Induction
Speith
0.010-0.025*
0.009-0.012+
0.006-0.012*
0.003-0.006+
0.008-0.012+
'blted
Vacuum Melted
1962)
0.002-0.006
Table 2.3
See Text,
Page 24
Table 3.1
See Text,
Page 37
Table 3.2
See Text,
Page 41
Table
4.1
austenite
temperature
for
a steel
sources,
[Al] [N] in
product
solution
containing
Source
log10
Al
-7400
+ 1.95
Darken et al (1951)
0.1%C, 0.4oMn
-7750
T
+ 1.80
Knig et al (1961)
-6180
T-
-6015
T-
+ 0.31
Idem
-9200
7-
+ 2.92
0.40%C, 0.8 h,
-7500
+ 1.48
*Gladp
and
Pickering (1967)
0.1%C, 0.8 Y
"Nban" solubility
prior
product
work.
Steel Composition
1221
0.2%C, 1.50oNa,
0.15oSi
incorporating
T(C)
1386
0.6%Si 1281
0.2%oSi 1401
the results
of
Table 4.2
Interaction
elements in liquid
Element
x
steel
eAl
0.091
enx
Temperature
(0C)
Ref*
1600
1600
1600
0.0547
1600
-0.02
1600
-0.047
1600
-0.01
1600
-0.0115
1600
1600
1600-1750
1600-1750
0.123
Si
0.056
Ma
Cr
Ni
Mo
Al
0.043
828
N
1602
-0.912
*Refs.
(1960)
1.
2.
3.
-0.472
Table 4.3
Interaction
elements in austenite
Element
x
eN"
Temperature
(C)
Ref
1100-1300
0.125
1050-1200
0.0595
1000-1200
-114 40 076
r -1- .
1000-1200
32
.4 -10.0056
T
900-1200
-360 +0.136
1050-1350
-0.05
1000-1200
eAx
Al
-2.4
C
Si
Yn
Ni
Cr
Mo
*Refs.
(1973)
1.
Mayrhofer
2.
Schenck et al (1963)
3.
4.
S.
Ichise
et al (1971)
Table 5.1
Details
4169
Pouring
emp.
(e
1565
Si
hh
Al
Total
N
0.28
0.38
1.44
0.10
0.026
Comments
Extensive
porosity.
4176
1560
0.27
0.49
1.54
0.004
0.006
0.18
0.015
Used to examine
effects of heat
treatment.
4210
1560
0.30
0.51
1.76
0.005
0.007
0.17
0.017
Charpies.
4211
1565
0.29
0.49
1.65
0.005
0.006
0.07
0.017
High T heat
treatments.
4231
1560
0.29
0.46
1.55
0.005
0.007
0.08
0.008
Charpies.
4351
1565
0.28
0.38
1.56
0.005
0.007
0.12
0.014
Charpies and
high T heat
treatments.
4353
1550
0.42
0.48
1.55
0.009
0.009
0.20
0.018
Effect
of C
content.
4354
1540
0.56
0.51
1.68
0.010
0.011
0.22
0.020
Effect of C
content.
4355
1550
0.65
0.56
1.63
0.010
0.011
0.21
0.023
Effect of C
content.
4382
1570
0.30
0.42
1.58
0.005
0.009
0.08
0.014
Directional
solidification
work.
4383
1570
0.30
0.45
1.55
0.006
0.009
0.17
0.017
Directional
solidification
work.
46/1
1600
0.29
0.20
1.28
0.010
0.015
0.14
0.009
Fracture
toughness
testing.
46/2
1610
0.31
0.32
1.27
0.010
0.014
0.14
0.008
Fracture
toughness
testing.
46/3
1610
0.30
0.21
1.29
0.010
0.015
0.15
0.009
Fracture
toughness
testing.
46/4
1610
0.28
0.15
1.13
0.009
0.007
0.07
0.011
Fracture
toughness
testing.
Table Continued
Table 5.1
Details
Cast No.
Practice
of the Experimental
Pouring
emp.
(o
Castings
Si
bh
(Continued)
Al
Total
N
Comments
46/S
1610
0.29
0.17
1.23
0.008
0.011
0.22
0.015
Charpies.
46/6
1620
0.31
0.20
1.09
0.010
0.014
0.23
0.016
Charpies.
46/7
1610
0.29
0.26
1.46
0.010
0.015
0.21
0.017
Charpies.
46/8
1610
0.29
0.18
1.11
0.009
0.005
0.08
0.010
Fracture
toughness
testing.
46/89
1620
0.31
0.59
1.37
0.013
0.017
0.18
0.010
Fracture
toughness
testing.
N. B.
Table 5.2
See Text,
Page 82
Table
6.1
Electron
Camera constant
Zone axis
Diffraction
R
= 25.4mm
: <0001>
d
(calculated)
dX
(observed)
3210
7200
1.018
1.008
0.99
1.347
1.344
0.20
1210
1.555
1.558
0.21
0220
1.347
1.351
0.33
1230
7110
1.018
1.016
0.20
1.555
1.549
0.39
1100
2.693
2.688
0.20
0110
2.693
2.688
0.20
1120
2020
1.555
1.568
0.83
1.347
1.351
0.33
1010
2.693
2.687
0.20
1010
2.693
2.687
0.20
2030
1.347
1.351
0.33
1120
1.555
1.568
0.83
0110
2.693
2.687
0.20
1100
2.693
2.687
0.20
2110
1.555
1.549
0.40
3170
3300
1.018
1.016
0.19
0.898
0.894
0.20
3310
1.018
1.016
0.20
1370
1.018
1.016
0.20
0330
0.898
0.897
0.02
1340
0.747
0.726
2.85
Diffracting
Planes
% Error
in d.
Table
6.2
Electron
Camera Constant
Zone axis
Diffraction
= 25.4rmn
Data for
A1N Dendrite
: <1123>
d
(calculated)
d
(observed)
7023
1.185
1.181
0.31
3122
0.943
0.937
0.56
4222
0.742
0.726
2.23
1011
7111
2.370
2.363
0.31
1.485
1.451
2.23
3211
0.997
0.996
0.14
X311
0.739
0.726
1100
'1100
2.693
2.688
1.77
`0.20
2.693
2.688
0.20
2200
1.347
1.344
0.20
3300
0.898
0.894
0.38
2111
1.485
1.451
2.23
101
2.370
2.363
0.31
0111
1211
2.370
2.374
0.16
1.485
1.530
3.07
2311
9T2
0.997
1.016
1.86
0.943
0.937
0.56
2022
1.185
1.181
0.31
1122
1.320
1.344
1.84
0222
1.185
1.187
0.16
1372
0.943
0.985
1.69
44,113
0.681
0.667
2.17
3033
0.790
0.782
1.08
2133
0.868
0.864
0.50
1233
0.868
0.864
0.50
0333
0.790
0.791
0.16
1433
0.681
0.671
1.35
Diffracting
Planes
% Error
in d.
Table
6.3
The Angles
from Measurements
Plate
designation
(in
degrees)
Stage of the S. E. M.
in the Goniometer
53
108
68
39
53
109
31
74
108
109
76
70
68
31
76
71
39
74
70
71
Table la
Angle between plates
1: 3
= 108
1: 4
68
3: 4
76
2: 3
= 1090
2: 5
740
3: 5
70
Calculated
Table 6.4
The effect of aluminium and nitrogen contents on the room temperature
fracture
mechanism of 0.30C - 1.50bh steel castings
Al (%)
Total
N (%)
[Al]
[N]
Fracture
Dbrphology
x10-
4169
0.10
0.026
2.6
Extensive porosity,
but
remainder 100% I. F.
4176
0.18
0.015
2.7
4210
0.17
0.017
2.9
90% I. F.,
4211
0.07
0.017
1.2
0% I. F.,
100% Fibrous
4231
0.08
0.008
0.6
0% I. F.,
100% Fibrous
4351
0.12
0.014
1.7
50% I. F.,
50% Fibrous
46/1
0.14
0.009
1.3
0% I. F.,
100% Fibrous
46/2
0.14
0.008
1.1
0% I. F.,
100% Fibrous
46/3
0.15
0.009
1.4
0% I. F.,
100% Fibrous
46/4
0.07
0.011
0.8
0% I. F.,
100% Fibrous
46/5
0.22
0.015
3.3
40% I. F.,
60% Fibrous
46/6
0.23
0.016
3.7
50% I. F.,
50% Fibrous
46/7
0.21
0.017
3.6
5011I. F.,
50% Fibrous
46/8
0.08
0.010
0.8
0% I. F.,
100% Fibrous
46/89
0.18
0.010
1.8
90% I. F.,
10% Fibrous
10% Fibrous
The samples had been quenched from 950C and tempered for
bending.
They were broken by slow three-point
ihr
at 600C.
Table
6. S
Sample No.
The Effects
of Heat Treatment
bhchanism
0.18A1,0.015N)
Hardness (Hv30)
Heat Treatment
Fracture
Fracture Mechanism
202
95% cleavage,
WQ
247
10% Fibrous,
90% I. F.
4176/3
254
0% Fibrous,
100% I. F.
4176/4
227
20% Fibrous,
4176/5
244
5% Fibrous,
4176/6
900C lhr WQ
504
10% Fibrous,
90% I. F.
4176/7
cool
210
0% Fibrous,
100% I. F.
4176/8
900C lhr
furnace cool
161
60% Fibrous,
4176/1
As cast
4176/2
900C lhr
5% I. F.
80% I. F.
95% I. F.
40% I. F.
0
0
wQ
t
; '.
, "a
ela ce
W.
-a
o o(,
U.
=eo
cfNLn LJ1
N
--1
'?
N
-p
N
to
O
N
'n
0
0
M
9
4-J Ln
CQ . e
'
a
r
r-1
fV
r-"1 -
O
M ct
LJ O
a
C
F
=~"T
" v
ca
F
Ne.
N.
'O
n
O O
LJ
If)
N.
L'L1
00
Q
eo
MM
MM
'.O
"
. o..
2: r
C)
C)
oo
jr
"r
"-
';
C-C'
r
IRT -r
E
0
4-1
0000
f3
j..
'r
0 C
00
4O
Q-:
t3
C!
'/1Z
VT
00
-. 4
00
Q
.
V
N
d
H
W
0
rl
4-1
-4
4.0
.,
3
+j
+,
a+
.4
a+
-1
+4
4-1
'
4.4
E
r
LW
C.
.O
YC
i-+
U
O
Q)
oo
ct
14
01
1--1
-4
cV
M
M
_
M
NN
NN
NM
N
et
O
N
er
O
. -1
O
N
ll)
M
N.
V
N
F+
"-rN
. r{
cc
C
42
'0
u7
y
O
.-
Ic
"
b
w
0
ti
x
.
0
Ln
o)
00
O
IJ
00
Go
e'
N
O
N-
"D
Ln
Ln
co
i
Ui
ON
r-i
rpi
cS
F
O
+
"N
to I
9
CD
;Z
oo
N-
co
co
N-
Lf
t.P)
00
N-
00
N-
%
n
00
O
Ln
N-
In
I-
I1
Lh
Ln
N-
00
00
N-
Lm
(N
00
Ln
-zr
co
II
N
C
H
v1
I
a"
M 14 1-
Nz
. rte
0 0 0 0 L 8
41
N g N C,
LI)
0
Ln
r1l
cl
end
FF
0
O
". A b0
O t+
1-4 a)
V)
r
\y
N
Q
v
\
N
Ln
\
M
CA
Ln
\
N)
Ln
\
Ln
ct
\
\
NM
et
co
\
at
Ln
\
"7
\
of
\
mt
Ln
IM
Ln
\
a7
\
of
\
er
a)
U
C)
C)
C
C)
4-J
iJ
"
:i^
"
r
Q
r-1
'
rl
"i
.
t7
,
C
C)
U
G:.
w
r
O
rl
O
'
,
C
F".1
-M
4-1
w
rl
"^
w
l
"1
"0
.O
'
>4
02
.
C)
4-j+
'O "-1
O
4-j
>G
C
^p
0b
0 '7
p
^
ax
.:
p
K
C)
00
IN
Co
z
a
.,
c
C)
4J
.4
'
.
w
\0
cc
O
00
O
CO
.O
C
CO
C
O
C
C
C
C
N-
IU,
IU,
0
U
U,
C)
r.
CU
G.
-W
n=
U-
/D Z
"'1
CO
O
N
CO
co
O
C",
Ln
P-4
-4
M
\
M
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
cl,
CO
cc
co
00
ono
C)
e
-rl
CIO
>
_y
U'
S3
>
C3
0
iii
E)
rl
ao
eo
4-1
U
Cl
0
73 -1
0
.
i+
rl
i.=
it
.:,
..r'i
=
I
t.-r
t-1
oo
eo
co
o.e
r-4
eY
V
tn
M
Ln
c
M
.0r"
W
i..
.0rl
s.+
.JH
a
.=1
;..
r^I
I.. 4
oa
oo
oe
M
N
N
\O
v)
LI
Ln
'
N
00
00
W
oe
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
..
'n
X_
g
'a
="
l)
C)
N
t`
1
'O
Q
i'
et
e'
1.0
Q
U=
C
N
rte.
c3
"
O
O
11C
O
C
N.
rl%
rl%
0
O
O
C
O
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
0
it
U0
'
--1
1
NI
Lu
I
fV
+
N
t
t1:
+
vi
wr
to
O
C.:
r-y
+
--1
+
'n
co
E"+E
00
Cn Z
VT
00
(14
tn
ct
cC
co
to
C.
.'
C)
O
"ri
CO
cJ
C)
03
Lr
i=+
r-4
L:.
r"
-A
0
z
M
.
16,1=
011%
C
D
%-o
4J
M
:z
-, r
'0
N
O
O
A
ov
r4
4J
A
CJ
f.
r Q
0J
^
"-I
f"+
C)
;nZ
L! 1
I
M
\
N
\
N
\
co
cc
co
00
0
0
J
:n
e,
K^
!
,
r3
4J
ea
oa
.c
r"
^
cS
C)
C)
,. a
y^
:)
W
.7
..
`o `-'
[-
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
. -r
uQ
`o
;n
`'
e3
0
Cp
"
J-
nZ
c:r
\
"
er
L:.
\
Q
\
\
D
"1"
rt
FIGURES
Fig.
2.1
of steel
"
i0
Fl
N-O"
i0
^f
ti
8,3
d s=
J
8 ea
8? 8
q=
an
mammas
s=
8 s3
an
2s=
----s
ry
tQ
nqn?
O
4-
Wz
r,
O
s=i
to
$
q
ao
8 s:
4d
0
u
rr
f)
"o"nn-o"a"nr-0
3ONY
4311/15 NI SLN31N0
N39O
C) Z
'"-+
4.1 r+ J
"14
to
in
"wn-o"0"
a-
G)
og
E
C
W
~
a
a
9
saC
e
k
c
a
S
c
a
i
e !
e
S
_O7
F
2
L
M====
mommma
Hf
VMN-O"WtmN-O
"
"=UZ
rd
a9
frt
U
CD 'n
Q
W
(D
s
a
lR
9$
;
u=
oc^ov
CD
--
0.30
I"1
0.25
ATM
ATM
e5
10 ATM
ae 0.20
z
W
}
20 ATM
15400C
0.15
X
0
0.10
o,
o
0.05
0.2
0.4
ao
M6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
CARBON, %
Fig.
in liquid
Carbon/oxygen equilibrium
(Marshall
CO pressures
and Chipman,
2.3
iron at various
1942).
0.05
0.04
0.03
z
I
0.02
0.0I
i
oc
Fig.
2.4
500
1000
Degrees C
1500
The solubility
of nitrogen
gas at 1 atmosphere
in pure iron under equilibrium
conditions
(Darken and Gurry, 1953).
N 0-22
(%)
4.60
11
Al
220
0445
a;
18
o.
'
V
/
Nb
/
S
I
o
0
als
Cr,
0.16
14
a 1z
14
'
Ta
a08
Mn
06
a
W
0
-- --
Co,Ni
02
a
Sx
0
02468
10
-r
Fig.
2.5
12
1L
010j
The solubility
at 1 atmosphere N7
of nitrogen
iron alloys
in liquid
binary
pressure
at 1600C
(Pehlke and Elliott,
1960).
1100
'5
so
25
0
N
z
v
25
01
-el 5C
a
lS
r.
z
100
"'5
'50
Temperature(C,
Fig.
-7.6
Standard free-energy
vs. ternDerature diagram for
1(I55).
Ende,
(Pearson
the formation
and
of metal nitrides
I
---
F4
Z
W
23
NITROGEN
HYDROGEN
A
0.010
IND
z
8
2Z
W
REDUCING PERIOD
OXIDIZING
LADLE
z
0.006 W
0
ac
PERIOD
10
20
30
50 60 70 80
40
TIME AFTER CLEAR MELTED, min
Z3
90
101
}{
i
BATH BLOCKED
OXIDIZING
Z
W
LADLE
0
PERIOD
S,
i
10
Fig.
2.7
20
50
40
60
30
70
TIME AFTER CLEAR MELTED, min
80
90
0
U,
0
CL
I
0
Fig. 2.9
FRAG ON
SOLJOJFIED
fA
m
J
H
W
-180
Fig.
3.1
0
-60
-20
-100
C
TEMPERATURE
-140
Impact transition
steel showing the
(a) is the curve
(b) is the curve
(Wright, 1962).
20
60
100
0
E
z
D
V
a
D
8"
W
N
N
6"
lZ.
."""
"
ti
LU
.J
d
D
2 .i
+K'"Z
0123
INCLUSION SIZE
Fig.
3.2
Di )im
20pm
Fig.
3.3
NhS inclusions
Type I (spherical)
fracture
surface of a 0.30C-1.50'i
on the fibrous
steel.
dar
:1
20pm
Fig.
3.4
A190.,
inclusions
of"a')0.30C-1.5O
on the
h1 steel.
fibrous
fracture
su,
ice
2C}gym
,. W- 1L
Fig.
3.5
Type III
Fracture
fibrous
(angular)
inclusions
the
is
on
surface ofd a (). 3C-l. 5Oh steel.
2.0
q
Qe.
Spheroidal carbide
1.0
c
L
U,
Plate
lphides
su
Fig.
Elongated
sulphides
3.6
5
Volume
Rearlit ic carbide
10
Effects
of the type and shape of second-phase
ductility
on the tensile
of steel
particles
(Gladman et al, 1971).
20.U
Fig.
3.7
1a
ti
f
?
Lattice
resistance
Ti
=
+-rjl
(b)
ce
d/2
d12
(al
Stress
zffo,
(T-Ti)
4k
tI
lllr
Fig.
3.8
The effects
and fracture.
of slip hands in yield
d
diameter
in
band
(a)
a grain of average
slip
(b)
Model as a shear crack (KII mode)
(c)
Stroh's
model for cleavage fracture
based on the attainment
value
of a critical
in
the unyielded
tensile
the
Qmm,,
stress,
of
(Knott,
1973b)
grain
.
Tensile
stress
p
b= z (1111
\\
,,
b =a (OOtJ
nb
(111J
I
Fig.
3.9
Cottrell's
model for
cleavage
fracture
(Knott,
1973b).
/.
.\
V%
Fib.
3.10
Photomicrograph
cleavage crack
1981).
(Knott,
Fig.
x. 11
of a
i1000
in a
Fig.
3.12
Scanning electron
micrograph showing cleavage
in a low carbon steel.
fracture
Crack propagation
has been from right
(Hertzberg,
to left
1976).
25Nm
Fig.
3.13
Quasi-cleavage,
typical
fracture
of quenched
of a discrete
presence
second phase
exposure
bearing
presence
elemental
to a hydrogenenvironment
to
exposure
liquid metals
exposure
to
a corrosive
environment
exposure
certain
at highapplied
stresses
creep
temperatures:
o1 segregated
impurities
to
neutron
irradiation
high-temperature
fatigue
corrosion
and
stress-relief
cracking
embrlttlement
Fig.
Fig.
3.15
3.14
are
Schematic representation
of the cohesion between
two atoms as a function
of separation:
Go is the
equilibrium
separation,
to a minimum
corresponding
in the force-distance
relation,
and am is the
maximum cohesion beyond which fracture
should occur
(Hondros and McLean, 1976).
2200
5Ft-n
FSn
1800
`.
ppaC
"
11400
11000
Cu -Sb
s2,
c
.o-
Cu-l
600
0a0001
vwVI
0101
Sakiti
Fig.
3.16
eoncentrotlon
0-1
jC
atone ,o
A logarithmic
plot showing the dependence of surface
Grain
boundary
bulk
content.
solute
energy on
behaviour
(Hondros
thibit
similar
and McLean, 1970).
energies e:
Fig.
3.17
fracture
Typical
from a hot tear.
surfaces
Note
features
the dendritic
and the oxidation
the
of
The central
bright
surface.
area is cleavage
fracture
which has occurred as a result
the
of
samples being broken after cooling
xj
(Croft,
1979)
.
100pm
Fig.
3.18
The fracture
surface of an Fe-O. U8C alloy,
showing the interdendritic
morphology associated
with hot tearing
(Shin, 1981).
(a)
(b)
p to'Ogl
(c)
Fig.
3.19
(a)
(b)
(c)
A typical
solidification
cracking test specimen
The schematic layout for
measurements
resistance
The milled
holder
in
used
casting
a perspex
for resistance
measurements (Shin,
1981).
ac
Fig.
3.20
Frccture
Fig.
3.21
the
path
frrte
:ina
'tes
austnrte
grain
t)ounaary
0
0
v0
0
E
3'
O
scr
.
T2tIC
pho5onorus
tltstrbutton
II
! ractura
surtaca
Fig.
3.22
r4
4w
4:
.
Fig.
3.23
Transmission
electron
micrograph
from the intergranular
extracted
of a O. 22C-0.75Nh steel casting
(Hanner: et al, 1968).
of NbC plates
fracture
surface
Nb
0.
C7
containing
260
0.04 t 0.06
0.08
400
540
0.0
2 0.016
O
O
Z
0.012
0.008
0.004
0.02
1 lb/ton
0.10 0.12
0.14 t 0.16
2 lb/ton
0.18
0.20%
3Ib/ton
% ALUMINIUM ADDED
4.1
Fig.
0.10
oG
1%
..
0.05
uni
0
O
eG
Z%
1350C
0.05
ALUMINIUM (%)
Fig.
4.2
0.10
0.15
T CC)
1000 1100
1300
1200
1000
1100
10
uauio
10.1
2
AUSTENIT
10i
as
6.0
5.6
7.0
7.5
8.0
Fig.
4.3
0.04
0.02
Fig.
The variation
of A]N solubility
product with
temperature for liquid steel and austenite.
The upper lines are for pure iron, and the lower
GS-60 grade steel
lines for GS-40 steel.
(0.40C, 0.80Mn) lies between the two (Honer and
1978a).
Baliktay,
4.4
0.06
The solubility
temperatures.
and Pickering
0.08
0.1
%SOLUBLE AL
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Ar
0-th
10
tr- -A,
W1
or
V
Fig.
Fig.
4.5
.6
Transmission
electron
micrograph showing plate-like
precipitates
of ALti extracted
from the intergranular
fracture
surface of a 0.26C-1. SOjNisteel
X3500
(Wright,
1962).
Transmission,
form of ALN
electron
micrograph showing the dendritic
X1000 (Wright,
1962).
1050
1000
ZQ
950
900
Z cc
wQ
2V
850
8009
0
02 04 06 .08
.
.
.
10 12 14 16 18
.
.
.
.
.
%- ELEMENT
Fig.
4.7
A SMALL
KEEL BLOCK
25mm
SQUARE CASTINGS
75mm
Fig.
5.1
The position
of samples taken for impact testing
from (a)
the small keel block castings
and
(b)
the '5mm square castings.
OM SMALL
213,11
KEEL BLOCX
_r
I
I
tII
III
II
I
IA1 FROM
JOCmm SQUARE
"I
CASTINGS
Ir
iWII
NI
NII
xU
x7I.
YOW
WI?
'
1''
I `
rJ
/II
uV
ij
il1lyl
M
20mm
2Omrw
_/
loomm
Fig.
3.2
The positicn
of samples taken for fracture
from (a)
toughness testing
the small keel
block castings
the 10Om square
and (b)
castings .
C)
GW
t1"cl)
'4-)
Akil
:
dl l1 lI it li il
y.
. fit
1111 li ii
c:
pf
7B
O
TV
C
r,
W
W
^`
C.
4)
)
u:
'
uLv:
c '
:.
:
r
Vn
J
VZ
V,
MACHINED
W1
FATIGUE
NOTCH
CRACK
C.0 D.
APPARENT
CENTRE OF ROTATION
(Wal
Fib.
5.
Idealised
sanples.
notch
profile
during
of COD
K
J
G
F
C)
O
O
J
Fig.
;.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
unit.
+
'"
''
Fig.
-). b
Overall
vier
apparatus.
of the directional
solidification
`,
`1
Fig.
6.1
intergranular
A typical
fracture
room temperature
The sample was taken from cast 1176
surface.
by
broken
bending in the
slow three-point
and
Note how the
quenched and tempered condition.
delineates
fracture
the columnar grain boundaries
(X2)
of the casting.
Fig.
b. 2
facet
Optical
fractograph
intergranular
of an
showing the crtivstallographically
orientated
The bright
surface markings.
areas all reflect
features
can
simultaneously,
and the dark linear
'families'.
also be seen to occur in parallel
Surrounding
areas have been masked with lacquer.
(X50)
-"
Fig.
6.3
""-
Scanning electron
micrograph showing the intersection
of several grains on the fracture
MIacrosurface.
is brittle
the fracture
scopically,
and follows
the columnar grain boundaries.
The surface markings
to those in Fig. 0.2.
(XSO)
are similar
VU
"U
J
-,
et
.:.
'n
--
U
:7
Ln
is
o3
"^)'O
C)C)o
c_..
:0
+- ^J " ,-
.-
C) 0
'J
Q)
n C/) C)
ICJ
C)
_CJ
o
+ UO
'U
'--a
+..
CJ 0_
_
C) """' `"r0.,
iOc
rA
C)
n-
C)
U
'I
C) O
s1; 4".+
CJ
."
U
Ur
V7 --
- f.
H
Q)
C CJ '"
:. C
+-A
"!:;
=
.
Fig.
6.5
feature
in more detail,
Plate-like
X-ray map for Ali-Ka radiation.
with
a corresponding
(`G9CC)
TE
N
O
.,
1r.
1.1
"
U
U
C)
C
ct z
^.
.
if
0"
CC
r -C
"=p
v,
EN
.L-i
+-+
"*
O-
<
C)
-Of
-rn
V; Gi -' -'
CCU)L---cC
CL C*
CC
Cl)
_
E aL
W
cy Q)
_ +-' (1)
o
_=
t
0
U
CC
C!
EG
C.)
F-"
cC 4- U0
c" U
ct-.U
. _.. Ct r11
(l)
Cil
"Ij
C) S
C4-z
C)
4-+ o CC-
<
--q
-1 4- C- I--
CC CL"r-..
0
r. " r,
4J
C) C) LO
GL x+-
C) -
.-
CC
Cil Q) O
O C) C) +0 V)
UC
C)
cy 4-.+ 1- -4
E
Z
u
c0 3C
+ r cn CC C) O CC
e) L,4
v, cC v, C..
v;
tt
-
O\
CJ
C) t
UO
r^
<
UO
O
Uc4.
"
s.
bG
C)
/V
U7, ^ v,
-G=
4- C)
C> C) U + 'C3
V,
G cc
r
C) U
U
Cv.
.C
.
Cq
(a)
5Nm
J,
Fig.
o. 8(a)
is a scanning electron
micrograph showing the
form of :\1N on the
imprint
of the dendritic
fracture
surface of sample 416/1.
Fig.
6.3(b)
been
has
dendrite
ALN
shows a similar
which
of
of
extracted
replica
onto a carbon extraction
(dark field
the fracture
transmission
surface
electron
micrograph).
KON
Al
Nln
Fig.
b. )
Fc
'iFe
u
MI
Scanning electron
micrograph showing the same
halves
feature
on
mating
of a room
plate-like
fracture
intergranular
surface.
temperature
Energy dispersive
reveals one half to
analysis
be Al-rich,
the other half shows no k1
whilst
fracture
has
be
It
that
can
concluded
peak.
A1N/matrix
interface
by
decohesion
the
at
occurred
being
in
ALN
retained
on only one
results
which
half of the fracture
surface.
i0plil
Fig.
b. 10
in
Similar
feature
to
that
plate-like
shown
Fig. 6.9, again with Al being detected on
only one half of the fracture
surface.
1
`f
i
Fig.
6.11
40
Scanning electron
micro; raphs of a plate-like
feature with a central
'spine'
of ; lobular
inclusions.
%hS
One
half
fracture
the
of
,
the inclusions
surface contains
and the imprints
of these inclusions
are visible
on the mating
surface.
40
`%\
(B.F.)
%',
We\\\
P,
#,
(D.F)
BIrigllt
electron
faulted
replica
surface
LlC1d
Lind
heavily
a
showing
micrographs
inclusion
of NhS. Carbon extraction
fracture
intergranular
from
the
taken
WO)
(XlO2
4176/3.
of cast
o,'
F t. r
r'
:. ;
9040
Wl-
. 12tilt
O.5um
Fig.
b. 13
electron
micrographs
.\ series of transmission
showing the effects
of tilting
on the apparent
thickness
The thickness
of an AN plate.
was
a minima ii with 39 tilt.
if
j,
Fig.
b. 14
High magnification
transmission
micrograph of
the same ALN plate with 390 tilt.
The thickness
is measured to be 65nm (650 ).
e*
.0f
Fig.
6.15
The optical
goniometer used for preliminary
measurements of the angles between plate-like
features
observed on the fracture
surfaces.
Fig.
6.16
in the auxiliary
A charpv sample in position
holder used for angular measurements in
tilt
the S. E. M.
/T
i%%',
disappears
N
(iii) Plate disappearing values of R and T
define
the
uniquely
N.
plate normal
Fib.
c .1
.,
4,
50--Nm
Fig.
b. lS
A
of sCaulnng
elect-on
micrographs
features
showing plate-like
on an interfracture
granular
surface
which correspond
described
to the stages
in Fig.
6.17.
---
///
"3
"4
"5
"2
Fig.
6.19
Stereographic
projection
which
direction
of the plate normals
surface at the
of the fracture
numbering of the plate normals
to that in Table 6.3.
the
relates
to the position
The
centre.
corresponds
014
-I'
0
Fig.
6.20
.1
Scanning
fracture
electron
surface
micrograph
of the intergranular
from cast 4210, showing
the
line of intersection
of three columnar grains.
Two of these grains are contained
in the mating
half of the fracture
The A1N plate
surface.
.
in the centre of the micrograph extends
across
indicating
the discontinuity,
that it has an
orientation
relationship
with the prior
austenite
grain being observed.
Fig.
6.21
As Fig. (O,
but showing a1N plates terminating,
abruptly
at the line of intersection
of the
three grains
This indicates
these
plates
that
.
have an orientation
relationship
with one of
the to
austenite
grains on the mating half of
the fracture
surface.
24 tilt
2Opm
Fig.
b.
--
Two intersecting
fracture
surface.
on an intergranular
plates
`-
"'
45tilt
11(2
:: un
j)1; 1te<
IS
tilted
to the point of simultaneous
extinction.
The angle between the two
normals to the plates
is ?10 + 10.
IL
A
it
i
"Transmission electron
micrograph of a thin foil
taken from the prior austenite
grain bowldarv
Plates of ALN have nucleated
of sample 410/1.
in the grain boundary and grown into the adjacent
( `35 000)
to ferrite)
grains (now transformed
.
II'
`L
_(JST"1
4y
.,
.'"
r .
`=4 `
S+L
Fig.
6.25
TL
fIi
_"2
Longitudinal
section showing the position
of the
liquidus
in a directionally
solidified
sample of
(X50). Etch: 4, picral.
Optical
micrograph
cast 4383.
.:
r
+,C,'
fr .
1L'
Ai
1w
or
Fig.
6.26
Fine dendritic
liquid
region
structure
of the as-quenched
of the D. S. satimle.
Etch:
(\35).
-') picral.
r1
L
L+S
i
S (Y)
sWY)i
Fig.
b. 27
The variation
of fracture
morphology with position
along the directionally
castings.
solidified
The macroscopic fracture
morphology was the same
for casts 4382 and 4383.
;4
Fig.
Fig.
b. 28
0.29
for
intergranular
the
Ferrite
responsible
network
in
6.27.
Fig.
The
failure
seen
remainder
mode of
is
(X50).
Etch: 4 picral.
martensite
the
microstructure
of
'Fpe II
fracture
%hzSinclusions
on the interdendritic
surface of D. S. cast 4332.
9
r%
AIN
Sm
ti
Spm
Fig.
6.30
Dendritic
fracture
AIX precipitates
surface
of D. S.
on the interdendritic
cast 4333.
.a
T,
p
O
cpX
CMxOt.
U
vx
c^
iMM
L, U
fl +- '
.
r'
J-C
aC
F"+ U
U "-
Ci O
r'
rr.
"H
U+
NU
C)
. U
MUZ
r<
Sar
,.
P-
1.
''
w-
Y
rt
S
,
.
'
Fig.
6.32
Micro-hardness
impressions
used to identify
the
for
scan path
electron
probe microanalysis
of
4210.
Etch: Marble's Reagent
cast
(X150)
(a)
Fig.
6.33
(b)
Fracture
surfaces of three point bend specimens
in the quenched and tempered condition
taken from
a) Cast 4354 (0.56C)
b) Cast 4353 (0.12 C)
.
KEY:
900C 1hr WQ
900C 1hr WQ
650C 1hr WQ
900C Ihr
Air Cool
As Cast
900C Ihr WQ
650C'/zhr WQ
As Cast
900C
900C
1hr OQ
650C 1hr WQ
Fig.
6.34
1hr CQ
650C'/ihr
WQ
Fracture surfaces
from cast 41
after
various heat treatments.
(Actual size).
1250C
Cast
4'10
Cast
4351
for
1350C for
Fig.
6.35
High temperature
heat
casts 4210 and 4351.
ih r
Ihrs
'4hrs
water
ihr
4iirs
'-ohrs
Slow cool
furnace
treatment
schedules
for
quench
in
2pm
pp,
,0
Fig.
4k
Scanning
micrograph
electron
of cast 4210
followed
by a water
24hrs
12S0C
after
at
The
quench and temper at 600C for lhr.
A1N precipitates
coarsened
are clearly
visible.
6.36
10 HM
Fig.
6.37
form of
and exhibits
.,
(a)
"5
(b)
Fig.
b. 38
Optical
(uTletched) of cast 410
micrographs
heat treatment
showing
after high temperature
(a)
fom. of the AlN and
the plate-like
(b)
the coarsened dendrites.
Fig. a. 38a
(X-00)
.
(X1200)
Fig. b. 3Sb
S. E. Image
lOpm
._-,
01
AI Kit trace
lpm
Fig.
0.39
Scmning electron
micrographs of the coarsened
AlN in a polished
section,
using secondary and
backscattered
imaging, and energy
electron
dispersitie
analysis.
S
t
i
i
i
O/
1
0
0
m
/
\
X
\
iI//I
\
X
N
U
O
IX
w
/0
cr
w
3-
O/
i
LL. j
/0
/7C
X/
O/
cri
1/
Lt
/O
/X
/
v
O
O
0
0
CO
b
N
L
a)
:%i V
0
0
0
-C)
0
uI
"+
.;
(a)200C
(b)125C
(r) 250C
Fig.
b. 41
fracture
Typical
from tensile
test
surfaces
specimens broken at different
temperatures.
gis
is
increased,
fibrous
the
temperature
a
:
becomes more favourable.
mode of failure
11JO
CAST 4231
(0.03%D.1, O.008%N)
X
X
x
30
FIBROUS
xx
30
}
(.7
W
i- s30
v
CL
20
! CLEAVAGE
"100
"200
5.42
Fig.
00 r-I
300
200
100
TEMPERATURE CC)
0
Impact transition
curve for cast 4231, containing
0.0810.1 and G. 0C8N. Quenched from 950C and
tempered for 1hr at 60CC.
CAST 4210
(0. i7%A1,0.017N)
60 h-
(
100% F! BPCUS
560
X
zx
z
40
XxX
20 r
)C
I. F.
x
100% 1.F.
200
-100
0
TEMPERATURE
Fig.
o. 43
100
200
300
(Cl
: rznact transition
curve for cast -121C, containing
0.1; 'Ai and -3. CH-jN.
Quenched from 9S0C and
tenroered for lhr at (;OOOOC. Note that the true
upper shelf energy is not attained
Lmtil
in excess of _OOC because ;f the
temperatures
interjranu:
ar fracture
regime.
CD
0
0
a
O
cc
C3. Q
CD J
^y
7
U, w
F2
ze
CC
p
4
N
C)
6
wr
r0
Cc
w
2
w
OO
co
oTo0
n
(C)a3GUO V A9a3N3
^ti N
0
N
0
us
x
U
Ln
"
c^Z
\
u
O
U
o_
U
o
"
00
E
\X
V
U
0
0
UO
> "O
ch
9
Lo
8
(r) ADa3N3 13VdWI
cd c3
v.
'^
oc
.
8
N
04
"
r- "-
(a)
i.
(b)
Fig.
. 46(a)
(b)
Scanning electron
micrograph showing coarse
dendritic
features
fracture
on the fibrous
(X80)
surface of cast 4351.
A dendritic
feature
in more detail
showing
has been initiated
that fracture
in the normal
(X540)
way, by void nucleation
inclusions.
%hS
at
t'
(a)
(b)
F'ig.
b. 1;
Scanning electron
micrographs
showing the change
in fracture
testing
morphology with decreasing
Intergranular
temperature.
facets on Chlarpy
impact specimens taken from cast 4351, fractured
61
C;
(`:
at (.a) -S00C and (b)
-125C.
Fig.
o. 48
Scanning electron
micrograph showing cleavage,
fracture
low
temperature
mechanism
typical
the
(\^)
for all the (harpy s.7irples.
"i<
O F.
p
Ln
C>
n
lI
xOp
O
lfl
13
}OQ
CL
Ll
Ov0 O,
Op
.D
91
14
0
Un
i
ccc<rcy
P4xQ
u-j
0
0
i
I'D
Ln
o000
CI-4
r,
cn
--+
CC)
r--
CC)
(rC)
C-
Lr
C
E-
Oll
ON
C)
W. -
U
0
0
OU
U
CJ'-"
.0-,
ON m
o>
-TV)
L/)
W
Z
M
LO
CV L.
U
C)
OU
Lr
m
LiJ
4+
U
0
Ln
I'D
N
U-)
In
o
C)
Ln
(-
o000
Lr)
fV
In
oc
tl(i
C
cam'
4C
LU
Q)
r'
--
---
--i,
---
O
f
1 c-
c3 o
fx.
i
o
0
--
wij
Y
il
CD
Ln
ix
o_
w
cc
x ) ." ,
Q
w
CL
LLJ
i
t
,.
OOpOOOOO
C'
OOoOOOOO
u1
fr1
L-
t-j
r-
C)
L'n
r--------r--
---
-----;
------
- -__.
.-
---
C)
;-n
:J
0
0
r--
^
+J
U
"^i
4)
0 v,
U c7
5
L,
nv
Uc:
C> w
Cw
U'c
0
"^ U
V. V,
Q
Lfl
f`]
L
r
^
G:
-
`"
u1
111
pOOEO
`O
'OS
L
b
r'
O
Lil
r-
toad
C.G.displacement
Fig.
6.53
Schematic load/di-splacement
cui e associated
failures.
This behaviour was
with brittle
typical
temperature
of all samples at a testing
of -100C.
yam:
.
v
rlr;
y'x
t?
Iced
"-
+.
_
,-
,.,
_ __.
. iu.
C.G. displacement
Fig.
6.54
load
C.G. d sptCC2Tient
Fig.
4t
IJ
h
Fig.
0.5o
The fracture
surface of a IHIQT sample slowing
being preceded by fibrous
crack growth.
I. i.
Fatigue
crack
SLowfibrous
crack growth
changeof
plane
Intergranular
fracture
Omy
Fig.
o. 5;
Scanning electron
micrograph at the root of a
fatigue
crack showing a region of slow fibrous
crack growth prior
to intergranular
fracture.
In order to propagate
along the grain boundar`v,
the crack had to deviate
from it's'
ts original
plane
by 1.3rrm.
z
W
..
TEERGRANULARSTRENG,
Y1_LD
: TRENGTH
us
TEMPERATURE
is.
Schematic diarar
showing the variation
d
intergrmnular
stren-ths
and vie?
At a given temperature,
.
follow
the weakest ;math.
of cleat ae,
te: pe: ature.
0
0
LO
O
I
O
u
z
U
x
ZE
p0 LO
U
0
xO
QH
LL
C
~
Q
C u
U
U
x
r'
`c +c
0
U
_O
f
~\
RG
UZ
c-
=nC"
=G:
C; " r,
2
OO
Co
r'
O
v:
_)
ZE
W_
T
ice.
-i
v,
nC
"-!
-
+
+- O
Oy
Z
O
co u.
U
O
J
U
c, -"
ZO C) <
JUU
z
:
r
n
LA
le
CN
(-L X) N10 X IV 13
rQ
x
C)
:G
C
C)
^. r
r
C
.J
OG
. 71
0U
UO
c
"n
Z_
d
dC
V.
Z-
<
,; u
.r.
"
- -4
r- i r1
0
i. J \
bC
,.
KEY:
(111)v
Fe
on
"
atom
0 Mo atom on (0001),.,c
(a)
[11201/t
[1101r
KEY:
10-
-'
,-
v.
--
'
!
tit
Fe
(11'')
atom on
"
0 Al atomon (0001),
(b)
Q
7-i-
;
-
--
[11201a/
110
.
Fig.
7.4
a)
b)
200
150
Si
For steel containing O'4l%
1-S%Mn
a
cz.
SQO
0
1300C
so
""1 )r
Fig.
7.5
005
010
N
ALUMINIUM
0.15
0-20
r
NSF.
CII.
F.
TEMP.
C= cleavage
F= fibrous
a--
Tc L
(b) intermediate
matrix strength
i
1
1
I.F.
TEMP.
'i
l
Fig.
TEMP.
Schematic strength
diagrams
temperature
the effects
f T`.) on
of matrix strength
intergranular
fracture
behaviour. '
showing