0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
26 Ansichten4 Seiten
This document discusses the idea of establishing a universal language to promote understanding between people and reduce conflicts arising from language barriers. It considers English and Esperanto as potential universal languages. While English is widely spoken internationally, choosing it could financially benefit English-speaking nations. Esperanto was created to be politically neutral but failed to gain widespread adoption as it does not transmit culture. The document also notes that some of the research cited is over 15 years old and may not reflect current perspectives.
This document discusses the idea of establishing a universal language to promote understanding between people and reduce conflicts arising from language barriers. It considers English and Esperanto as potential universal languages. While English is widely spoken internationally, choosing it could financially benefit English-speaking nations. Esperanto was created to be politically neutral but failed to gain widespread adoption as it does not transmit culture. The document also notes that some of the research cited is over 15 years old and may not reflect current perspectives.
This document discusses the idea of establishing a universal language to promote understanding between people and reduce conflicts arising from language barriers. It considers English and Esperanto as potential universal languages. While English is widely spoken internationally, choosing it could financially benefit English-speaking nations. Esperanto was created to be politically neutral but failed to gain widespread adoption as it does not transmit culture. The document also notes that some of the research cited is over 15 years old and may not reflect current perspectives.
Shayan Ebrahimi English 101 Davenport August 12, 2014 Title page is missing
English and the New World Order
One of the major causes of differences today between people and nations is the diversity of their languages. Wars, misunderstandings, conflicts, (comma in a series) and disputes arise from the lack of clear understanding and communication. The need for a universal language is obvious. Thesis is present There are about 7106 languages spoken around the world today. (Lewis, 2014, p. #) Linguists believe that there are two reasons for this diversity of languages. The first reason is that languages change; the second reason is that language is identity. (Norton, 2011, p. #) For a language to be universal it must have universal effects. English is the official language of about 60 sovereign states. It is the third most-common native language in the world, after Mandarin Chinese and Spanish. (Ethnologue, 1999, p. # - Also, 15 years old, what does current research report?) English started with expansion of the United Kingdom and wide spread around the world by US through the commerce, religion, education, media and technology. It is most convenient for these reasons to have English as the universal language.
Ebrahimi 2
However, selecting English as the universal language can significantly
benefit English-speaking nations financially and therefore it would not serve as a politically neutral means of communication; in growing concerns about neutrality, a new language called Esperanto was invented by Ludwik Lazarus Zamenhof. (Source?) His goal was to create an easy to learn, politically neutral language that would go beyond nationality and foster peace and understanding between people of all nations. Esperanto has been adapted by many national organizations around the world since early 19th century and is currently the language of instruction of the International Academy of Sciences in San Marino. (Fssmeier, 2012, p. #) This (starting sentences with words like, this, that, it, then, etc. forces the word to be a noun, which cannot be) seems may seem like a good idea at first, (comma before conjunction) but we (essay must be in third person with no first person references) should keep in mind that language is about more than simply transmitting information. It transmits culture, history, and literature, and can give the speakers a sense of identity. Because Esperanto is a mutual language, it doesnt (no contractions in business or academic writing) does not convey a culture and is therefore less likely to be able to do its job as a language. Esperanto failed to live up to its goal of becoming a second language (Levin, 1993 research is 21 years old) because people were reluctant to learn a new language which hardly anyone spoke.
Ebrahimi 3
In contrast to Esperanto, one out of five people currently knows or
actively speaks English. (Source?) All over the planet people know many English words, their pronunciation and meaning. English can be at least understood almost everywhere among scholars and educated people, as it is the world media language, and the language of cinema, TV, and technology. 80%Eighty percent (spell out at the beginning of a sentence) of the internet Internet is in English and it is predicted to be the language of the future. (Graddol, 1997 research is 17 years old) Hello Shayan, good start to argumentative writing. However, much of your research was not timely. When research is old it leaves the reader to wonder what current research says. There were other issues that are detailed in the text above and below Reference page was not APA format. Review all notes and feedback and let me know if you have questions. GRADE 14/20
Ebrahimi 4
Works Cited Not APA Format
Ethnologue, 1999. Retrieved from http://archive.org on August 11, 2014
Fssmeier, Reinhard. 2012. Retrieved from http://www.ais-sanmarino.org/ on 8/12/14 Graddol, David. 1997. Retrived from http://www.britishcouncil.org on August 12, 2014 Levin, Saul. 1993. "Can an Artificial Language Be More than a Hobby? The Linguistic and Sociological Obstacles". Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (Eds.). 2014. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 17th edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com Nortona, Bonny, and Toohey, Kelleen. 2011. Language Teaching / Volume 44 / Issue 04 / October 2011, pp 412-446 Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org on August 11, 2014