Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
INSTRUMEN PENTAKSIRAN
Kod Mata Pelajaran
023/024
Bentuk Ujian
Ujian Subjektif
Markah Penuh
40
Masa
1 jam 15 minit
b)
c)
d)
e)
GENERAL PERFORMANCE
On the whole, most of the candidates attempted all 3 sections. The performance of the
candidates ranged from low to high. There were many high achievers in all three
sections. Most of the candidates were able to develop ideas competently and provide
relevant details stylistically to support their responses.
Most of the high achievers used a wide range of vocabulary, variety of sentence
structures and interesting expressions in their responses.
The average achievers managed to understand the requirement of the task for all three
sections. Errors made were due to inappropriate vocabulary, grammar and failure to
transfer the information and clues given.
The low achievers were unable to develop ideas competently due to apt vocabulary,
language and structural errors. The tasks performed by the low achievers were
confusing, distorted, messy and incoherent. They resorted to stringing with chunks of
meanings. Generally, their responses were disorganized and less developed with an
uncertain flow of language.
For Section A, candidates were able to write simple sentences based on the picture
stimuli and two words given.
For Section B, candidates were able to identify, extract and lift the information correctly
from the dialogue into the framework.
For Section C, candidates were able to fulfill the task given with some grammatical
errors. However, some could not produce a good piece of work creatively. They strung
the notes given into simple sentences as they were not able to expand the notes using
interesting expression and new vocabulary with a good flow of story-line.
DETAILED PERFORMANCE
SECTION A
Candidates were given 10 pictures with two words for each picture. The words could be
nouns, verbs, adjectives or adverbs. They were required to construct one sentence to
describe the picture by using the words given. Candidates may change the order but not
the form of the words.
The high achievers were able to construct grammatically correct sentences using the two
words given. The average achievers were able to construct sentences with occasional
errors while low achievers strung the words given with mere insertions.
Question 1
The sentence above is an example of average category. Pronoun they is correctly used,
though a very simple sentence.
A sample of weak achiever is shown above whereby wrong usage of pronoun there can
be detected.
Question 2
Correct usage of noun is shown in the example above. This sample is an example of
high achievers.
The incorrect usage of past tense was found in the sentence above is an example of
weak achiever.
Question 3
This is an example of a simple spelling error mothe made by low achiever group.
Question 4
The above sample shows high achievers interesting sentence using a correct adjective
broken.
The definite article the is used to construct a correct and simple sentence.
Question 5
An example of high achiever is shown above whereby both given words were used very
well in the sentence to describe the picture.
For
The word farmer is wrongly described as holes shows weak achievers category.
Question 6
The verb raping the present is wrong in this sentence, therefore the example above
belongs to weak achievers category.
Question 7
The above example used the correct adjective of fierce to describe the barking dog.
This is an example of high achiever group.
10
The continuous tense with a time frame now is used correctly in this sentence.
Weak achievers show grammatically incorrect sentence. The above example shows the
omission of the preposition at.
Question 8
11
Question 9
High achievers group shows correct sentence construction. The usage of time frame
just now is shown above.
The past tense is used correctly to describe the picture. This is an example of average
achievers category.
Inappropriate usage of word among weak achievers group could be detected. The word
sky to describe the picture is wrongly used.
12
Question 10
The ability to use correct pronoun itself with the correct preposition behind could be
identified in high achievers group.
The word now in this sentence is wrongly used. This is a sample of average achievers
category.
Weak achievers show incorrect usage of preposition. This sample shows a wrongly
used preposition in.
13
14
The candidates in this group were able to identify all the content points and transferred
them intelligently and appropriately with correct punctuation, spelling, phrase and time
frame which indicated that they had mastered their grammar and vocabulary.
15
The candidates in this group were able to select and place some content points
appropriately into the given framework but there were some confusion and grammatical
errors.
Most of the candidates were able to gain some marks for this section by merely giving
responses at word or phrase level extracted directly from the given notes and placing
them in the given blanks.
16
SECTION C
In Section C, a series of three pictures with notes was given. Candidates may use the
notes to make sentences about the pictures. Section C assessed the writing skills of the
candidates. Most of the candidates were able to express themselves well in a variety of
sentences. Candidates were also able to insert new words and ideas appropriately and
correctly. There were candidates who had written excellently which surpassed the ability
of a twelve-year-old. They were able to use adjectives, adverbs, idioms, similes and
descriptive language intelligently. To gauge their proficiency in the language, candidates
had to construct a variety of simple and compound sentences. Candidates must be able
to sequence the paragraph well using appropriate connectors.
17
Candidates in the high achievers were able to write simple and compound sentences.
Some of the candidates were able to write complex sentences using appropriate and
interesting expressions based on the stimuli to express their ideas, therefore fulfilling the
task very well. The candidates responses reflected clear understanding as they were
able to provide informative details. The candidates showed confidence and good
command of the language to write creatively. The sentence structures varied and there
were hardly any errors. Candidates also used suitable and appropriate connectors to
sequence the story line. These proved that they had a wide range of vocabulary and
had mastered the grammar rules very well, showing flair of the language and fully
understood the requirements of the task.
18
19
For the average achievers, candidates showed basic understanding of the language to
fulfill the task required of them. Most of the candidates did not display proficiency as the
high achievement group. Generally, they attempted the task and it was almost fulfilled.
Some confusion of meaning and grammatical errors occurred. They managed to use
simple sentences and phrase level construction. They attempted to use new words and
phrases but there was a little confusion.
20
21
The low achievers showed a little understanding of the task. They made a lot of errors in
grammar and sentence structure. The candidates were confused with the meanings of
the notes given. The candidates showed minimum understanding of the task. Their
ideas were not shown clearly. Many errors in grammar and sentence structures were
detected. There was stringing of words in the sentences. The responses were
disorganized and incomprehensible due to poor command of the language and limited
vocabulary. Some merely direct lifted the given words with no changes. The language
used was inaccurate.
22
SUGGESTIONS TO CANDIDATES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
23
SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
24
25