Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BALANCED
SCORECARD
to Implement Strategy at
28
WINTER 2001
AND
S U S A N K E R S H AW R N , O C N
n The Balanced Scorecard,1 Robert Kaplan and David Norton tell the story of how the CEO
of an undersea construction company guided senior managers to develop an explicit mission statement. This process lasted several months, after which the mission statement was
distributed throughout the company. Soon thereafter, the CEO received a phone call from a
manager on a drilling platform in the North Sea. The manager said, I want you to know that I
believe in the mission statement. I want to act in accordance with the mission statement. Im
here with a customer. What am I supposed to do? How should I be behaving each day, over the
life of the project, to deliver on our mission statement? In this company, there was clearly a disconnect between the words in the mission statement and the actions required to implement
them on a day-to-day basis. Kaplan and Norton suggest that this is a common problem in the
business world, and they propose the Balanced Scorecard as a means for linking strategic objectives with day-to-day activities.
IN
The main purpose of a Balanced Scorecard is to connect employee behavior to the organizations mission. This is accomplished by translating an
organizations strategy into a collection of objectives
and performance measures for financial, customer,
internal business processes, and learning and
growth. Each of these perspectives should be linked
in a chain of cause-and-effect relationships that conveys the organizations vision and strategy.
Financial performance measures usually are
associated with profitability. Typical measures would
include operating profits, return on assets, and individual product line or customer profit margins. Other financial measures can be used, however,
depending on the nature of the industry and the
companys business strategy. For instance, a company following an aggressive growth strategy might be
more interested in market share and revenue growth
measures than traditional profitability indicators. In
order to achieve financial goals, companies need to
deliver products and services that fulfill their targeted customers needs.
29
AT
WINTER 2001
IN A BALANCED SCORECARD
Mission: To be the most successful company
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE
Financial success will be measured by:
Market Share
Revenue Growth
Operating Profits
Return on Equity
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE
To achieve financial goals, we need to meet
our customers needs as measured by:
Customer Satisfaction
Customer Retention
Quality Customer Service
S T. E L S E W H E R E H O S P I TA L
30
31
degree of employee
Table 1: HOSPICE UNITS BALANCED SCORECARD
turnover. Many of the
caregivers (nurses and
Performance Measures
aides) did not have
much hospice experiFINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE
Patient census
ence or specialized
Unit profitability
hospice training, and
patients did not feel
Funds raised for facility improvements
they were receiving
high levels of personal
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE
Patient satisfaction (survey)
attention and quality
care. Also, the director
Patient retention
of the hospice unit and
Patient referral rate
the nurses did not have
a good rapport with the
doctors and nurses of
INTERNAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE
Weekly patient complaints
feeder units like the
Employee turnover rate
oncology department
that referred patients
to them.
LEARNING & GROWTH PERSPECTIVE Employee satisfaction
These problems
Training hours per caregiver
resulted in a chronicalPatient loads
ly low patient census.
Without a reputation
for providing highen targeted reductions that managers were expected
quality care, many physicians refused to refer their
to achieve by improving efficiency and spending
patients to the St. Elsewhere hospice unit. This
less. Prior to the new strategic initiatives recommeant that patients being cared for in St. Elsemended by the special task force, hospital adminiswheres oncology unit were being referred to Genertration had been measuring management
al Hospitals hospice unit or other hospice programs
performance from a financial perspective only.
in the city. Alternatively, patients who did not want
This was counterproductive in the hospice unit.
to go to St. Elsewheres hospice unit were allowed
For example, the unit director was not about to
to remain in the oncology unit after their treatment
spend money on new furnishings to make the unit
had been discontinued. And because the demand
more homelike when he was expected to reduce
for oncology services exceeded St. Elsewheres
spending. The director also adopted a strategy of
capacity, physicians were referring new cancer
operating the unit with the smallest staff possible in
patients to Generals oncology unit. After analyzing
order to minimize the cost of providing care, and,
the situation, hospital administration determined
due to the budget constraints, there was very little
that many of these problems could be traced to the
money for providing the specialized hospice training
hospitals performance measurement system.
that was so badly needed. Operating with minimum
THE PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
staffing and few training opportunities created high
SYSTEM
employee turnover. This resulted in an unstable and
St. Elsewhere faced significant financial problems.
inexperienced staff of caregivers in the hospice unit,
Lower reimbursement rates from Medicare and
which led to poor relationships with their primary
managed care companies combined with the higher
feeder units in the hospital. The directors focus
costs of the new facility were forcing the administraon budget reductions was not compatible with the
tion to focus on cost reduction. As a result, the direcphysicians objective of high-quality care, further
tors of operating and support departments were
reducing patient referrals. It became clear to hospital
evaluated primarily on their ability to reduce budadministration that a more balanced approach to pergeted spending. Each department and unit was givformance measurement would have to be developed.
32
WINTER 2001
The scorecard
should guide the
daily actions of the
hospice unit staff to
achieve the
hospitals mission of
providing patientfocused care.
pice care was a critical patient service in the long
run, so a Balanced Scorecard that promoted patientfocused care was developed for the unit.
The unit director, along with two senior members
of the caregiver staff, worked with hospital administration to construct the units scorecard (see Table1).
They began the process by discussing the hospice
units role in achieving the hospitals goal of increasing market share (capturing a share of the growing
suburban population) by providing personal attention and quality care. They determined that the
scorecard had to be congruent with this strategy and
that the measures chosen had to be linked to form a
chain. This chain of performance measures would
have to communicate the units and hospitals goals
to all members of the hospice unit. The scorecard
should guide the daily actions of the hospice unit
staff to achieve the hospitals mission of providing
patient-focused care.
The group first focused on identifying the appropriate financial measures for the hospice unit. In the
short term, the goal was to utilize the units excess
capacity. This would improve the hospitals shortterm financial performance by increasing revenue,
and it also would support the goal of increasing market share. Improving the units patient census was
chosen as a key financial indicator. Hospital administration wanted the unit director and staff to initially focus on the revenue side of profitability rather
than on cutting costs. In the future, when the census had improved and stabilized, the plan was to
measure the units profitability (revenue minus controllable costs). In addition, it was determined that
the unit director should actively participate in fundraising activities for facility improvements. Because
the hospitals capital budget was limited, the hospice unit director needed to work with the hospitals
director of fundraising to provide money for renovating the facility. The amount of money raised for
facility improvements was chosen as another key
financial measure for the hospice unit.
In order to improve the units census and raise
money for facility renovations, the hospice unit
would have to significantly improve patient satisfaction, so a patient satisfaction questionnaire was
developed. The survey asked the patient and/or
family members to rate the quality of care and level
of personal attention they received on a scale from
poor to excellent. The surveys were conducted several times during a patients stay, and the director
and senior caregivers reviewed the results, personally resolving any problems. Family members also
completed a survey at the end of a patients stay,
which was used as a measure of customer satisfaction for the unit. Patient retention (percentage of
patients that remain in the unit once admitted) also
was used as an indicator of patient satisfaction. Previously, many patients would ask their doctor for a
transfer to General Hospital or other hospice units in
the city shortly after being admitted. Increased
33
MEASURE CHAIN
PATIENT
CENSUS
(PROFITABILITY)
PATIENT
RETENTION
RATE
One indicator of
quality care was the
number of patient
complaints received
each week.
weekly survey questionnaire or by speaking with
the director or senior caregivers. The long-term goal
was to eliminate patient complaints. To do this, the
unit director believed that the caregivers needed to
develop a closer, more consistent relationship with
each patient. If patients and family members
received care from the same nurses and aides on a
regular basis, patient satisfaction should improve. To
provide a more consistent level of quality care, however, employee turnover needed to be reduced significantly. Given the historically high turnover rates,
it was not uncommon for patients to receive care
from a variety of caregivers during their stay in the
unit. As a result, the employee turnover rate was
chosen as a measure of the units ability to deliver
34
WINTER 2001
PATIENT
SATISFACTION
TRAINING
HOURS PER
CAREGIVER
FUNDS RAISED
FOR FACILITY
IMPROVEMENTS
FEEDER UNIT
REFERRAL RATE
NUMBER OF
WEEKLY
PATIENT
COMPLAINTS
EMPLOYEE
TURNOVER
EMPLOYEE
SATISFACTION
PATIENT
LOADS
35