With Tie W/o Tie

27
22
23
16
25
25
22
19
25
21
26
24
21
20
25
19
26
23
28
26
22
17
Ques 17.59
9
11
17
10
22
15
6

27
38
25
40
31
19
35

16
21
18
28
29
20
31

XLSTAT 2015.5.01.23680 - Comparison of k samples (Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, ...) - on 11/26/20

Samples: Workbook = Book1 / Sheet = Sheet1 / Range = Sheet1!$B$17:$D$23 / 7 rows and 3 c
Significance level (%): 5
p-value: Asymptotic p-value

Summary statistics:
Variable Observations
Obs. withObs.
missing
without
datamissing
Minimum
data
Maximum
Var1
7
0
7
6.000
22.000
Var2
7
0
7
19.000
40.000
Var3
7
0
7
16.000
31.000

Mean
12.857
30.714
23.286

Kruskal-Wallis test:
K (Observed 11.969
K (Critical v
5.991
DF
2
p-value (Two
0.003
alpha
0.05
An approximation has been used to compute the p-value.
Test interpretation:
H0: The samples come from the same population.
Ha: The samples do not come from the same population.
As the computed p-value is lower than the significance level alpha=0.05, one should reject the
null hypothesis H0, and accept the alternative hypothesis Ha.
The risk to reject the null hypothesis H0 while it is true is lower than 0.25%.
Ties have been detected in the data and the appropriate corrections have been applied.

Multiple pairwise comparisons using Dunn's procedure / Two-tailed test:

Sample
Var1
Var3
Var2

FrequencySum of ranks
Mean of ranks
7
34.000
4.857
7
83.500
11.929
7
113.500
16.214

Table of pairwise differences:

Var1

Var2

Var3

Groups
A
B
B

Var1
0
-11.357
Var2
11.357
0
Var3
7.071
-4.286
Critical difference: 6.4984

-7.071
4.286
0

p-values:
Var1
Var1
Var2
Var3

1
0.001
0.033

Var2
0.001
1
0.196

Var3
0.033
0.196
1

Var2
Yes
No
No

Var3
Yes
No
No

Significant differences:

Var1
Var2
Var3

Var1
No
Yes
Yes

s, Friedman, ...) - on 11/26/2015 at 7:25:54 PM

B$17:$D$23 / 7 rows and 3 columns

Std. deviation
5.460
7.544
5.936

=0.05, one should reject the

s have been applied.

XLSTAT 2015.5.01.23680 - Comparison of k samples (Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, ...) - on 11/26/20

Samples: Workbook = Book1 / Sheet = Sheet1 / Range = Sheet1!$B$17:$D$23 / 7 rows and 3 c
Significance level (%): 5
p-value: Asymptotic p-value

Summary statistics:
Variable Observations
Obs. withObs.
missing
without
datamissing
Minimum
data
Maximum
Var1
7
0
7
6.000
22.000
Var2
7
0
7
19.000
40.000
Var3
7
0
7
16.000
31.000

Mean
12.857
30.714
23.286

Kruskal-Wallis test:
K (Observed 11.969
K (Critical v
5.991
DF
2
p-value (Two
0.003
alpha
0.05
An approximation has been used to compute the p-value.
Test interpretation:
H0: The samples come from the same population.
Ha: The samples do not come from the same population.
As the computed p-value is lower than the significance level alpha=0.05, one should reject the
null hypothesis H0, and accept the alternative hypothesis Ha.
The risk to reject the null hypothesis H0 while it is true is lower than 0.25%.
Ties have been detected in the data and the appropriate corrections have been applied.

Multiple pairwise comparisons using Dunn's procedure / Two-tailed test:

Sample
Var1
Var3
Var2

FrequencySum of ranks
Mean of ranks
7
34.000
4.857
7
83.500
11.929
7
113.500
16.214

Table of pairwise differences:

Var1

Var2

Var3

Groups
A
A

B
B

Var1
0
-11.357
Var2
11.357
0
Var3
7.071
-4.286
Critical difference: 7.9374

-7.071
4.286
0

p-values:
Var1

Var2
Var3
Var1
1
0.001
0.033
Var2
0.001
1
0.196
Var3
0.033
0.196
1
Bonferroni corrected significance level: 0.0167

Significant differences:

Var1
Var2
Var3

Var1
No
Yes
No

Var2
Yes
No
No

Var3
No
No
No

s, Friedman, ...) - on 11/26/2015 at 7:24:28 PM

B$17:$D$23 / 7 rows and 3 columns

Std. deviation
5.460
7.544
5.936

=0.05, one should reject the

s have been applied.

XLSTAT 2015.5.01.23680 - Comparison of k samples (Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, ...) - on 11/26/20

Samples: Workbook = Book1 / Sheet = Sheet1 / Range = Sheet1!$B$17:$D$23 / 7 rows and 3 c
Significance level (%): 5
p-value: Asymptotic p-value

Summary statistics:
Variable Observations
Obs. withObs.
missing
without
datamissing
Minimum
data
Maximum
Var1
7
0
7
6.000
22.000
Var2
7
0
7
19.000
40.000
Var3
7
0
7
16.000
31.000

Mean
12.857
30.714
23.286

Kruskal-Wallis test:
K (Observed 11.969
K (Critical v
5.991
DF
2
p-value (Two
0.003
alpha
0.05
An approximation has been used to compute the p-value.
Test interpretation:
H0: The samples come from the same population.
Ha: The samples do not come from the same population.
As the computed p-value is lower than the significance level alpha=0.05, one should reject the
null hypothesis H0, and accept the alternative hypothesis Ha.
The risk to reject the null hypothesis H0 while it is true is lower than 0.25%.
Ties have been detected in the data and the appropriate corrections have been applied.

s, Friedman, ...) - on 11/26/2015 at 7:20:46 PM

B$17:$D$23 / 7 rows and 3 columns

Std. deviation
5.460
7.544
5.936

=0.05, one should reject the

s have been applied.

XLSTAT 2015.5.01.23680 - Correlation tests - on 11/26/2015 at 7:09:04 PM

Observations/variables table: Workbook = Book1 / Sheet = Sheet4 / Range = Sheet4!$B$3:$C$
Type of correlation: Spearman

Summary statistics:
Variable Observations
Obs. withObs.
missing
without
datamissing
Minimum
data
Maximum
Cuppa/Wee
9
0
9
0.000
41.000
Job stress
9
0
9
20.000
85.000

Mean
16.889
50.000

Correlation matrix (Spearman):

VariablesCuppa/WeekJob stress
Cuppa/Wee
1
0.583
Job stress
0.583
1
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.05

p-values:
VariablesCuppa/WeekJob stress
Cuppa/Wee
0
0.108
Job stress
0.108
0
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.05

Coefficients of determination (Spearman):

VariablesCuppa/WeekJob stress
Cuppa/Wee
1
0.340
Job stress
0.340
1

Correlation map:

Correlation map

Scatter plots:
C uppa/Week

Job stress

/ Range = Sheet4!$B$3:$C$12 / 9 rows and 2 columns

Std. deviation
14.252
22.361

Ques. 17.52
Cuppa/Week

Job stress
25
80
41
85
16
35
0
45
11
30
2
50
34
65
18
40
5
20

XLSTAT 2015.5.01.23680 - Comparison of two samples (Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, ...) - on 11/26

Sample 1: Workbook = Book1 / Sheet = Sheet1 / Range = Sheet1!$B$2:$B$13 / 11 rows and 1
Sample 2: Workbook = Book1 / Sheet = Sheet1 / Range = Sheet1!$C$2:$C$13 / 11 rows and 1
Hypothesized difference (D): 0
Significance level (%): 5
p-value: Asymptotic p-value
Continuity correction: Yes

Summary statistics:
Variable Observations
Obs. withObs.
missing
without
datamissing
Minimum
data
Maximum
With Tie
11
0
11
21.000
28.000
W/o Tie
11
0
11
16.000
26.000

Mean
24.545
21.091

Mann-Whitney test / Upper-tailed test:

U
97.500
Expected va 60.500
Variance (U 229.167
p-value (one
0.008
alpha
0.05
An approximation has been used to compute the p-value.
Test interpretation:
H0: The difference of location between the samples is equal to 0.
Ha: The difference of location between the samples is greater than 0.
As the computed p-value is lower than the significance level alpha=0.05, one should reject the
null hypothesis H0, and accept the alternative hypothesis Ha.
The risk to reject the null hypothesis H0 while it is true is lower than 0.80%.
The continuity correction has been applied.
Ties have been detected in the data and the appropriate corrections have been applied.

Dominance diagram:

Dominance diagram

Mann-Whitney, ...) - on 11/26/2015 at 7:00:37 PM

$B$2:$B$13 / 11 rows and 1 column
$C$2:$C$13 / 11 rows and 1 column

Std. deviation
2.252
3.239

=0.05, one should reject the

s have been applied.