Sie sind auf Seite 1von 33

MTODOS DE ESTUDIOS

DIRECCIONALES
Profesores:
ING Gustavo Castillo
ING Francisco Rivas Lara
ING Jos Omar Snchez

I, A, DMD

Example - Wellbore Survey Calculations


The table below gives data from a directional survey.
Survey Point

A
B
C
D

Measured Depth
along the wellbore
ft

3,000

Inclination
Angle
I, deg

0
3,200
3,600
4,000

Azimuth
Angle
A, deg

20
6
14
24

6
20
80

Based on known coordinates for point C well calculate


the coordinates of point D using the above information.
3

Example - Wellbore Survey Calculations


Point C has coordinates:
x = 1,000 (ft) positive towards the east
y = 1,000 (ft) positive towards the north
z = 3,500 (ft) TVD, positive downwards
C
Dz

N (y)

N
Dz

E (x)

D
Dy
Dx
4

Example - Wellbore Survey Calculations


I. Calculate the x, y, and z coordinates
of points D using:
(i) The Average Angle method
(ii) The Balanced Tangential method
(iii) The Minimum Curvature method

(iv) The Radius of Curvature method


(v) The Tangential method
5

The Average Angle Method


Find the coordinates of point D using

the Average Angle Method


At point C,

x = 1,000 ft
y = 1,000 ft
z = 3,500 ft

Measured depth from C to D, DMD 400 ft


IC 14

A C 20

ID 24

A D 80
6

The Average Angle Method


Measured depth from C to D, DMD 400 ft
IC 14

A C 20

ID 24

A D 80

C
N (y)
Dz

N
Dz
Dy D

E (x)
Dx

The Average Angle Method

The Average Angle Method


This method utilizes the average
of I1 and I2 as an inclination, the
average of A1 and A2 as a
direction, and assumes the entire
survey interval (DMD) to be
tangent to the average angle.

I1 I2
IAVG
2
A AVG

A1 A 2

DEast DMD sin IAVG sin A AVG


DNorth DMD sin IAVG cos A AVG
DVert DMD cos IAVG

From: API Bulletin D20. Dec. 31, 1985

The Average Angle Method


IAVG

A AVG

IC ID 14 24

19
2
2

A C A D 20 80

50
2
2

DEast DMD sin IAVG sin A AVE


Dx 400 sin19 sin 50

Dx 99.76 ft
10

The Average Angle Method


DNorth DMD sin IAVG cos A AVG

Dy 400 sin19 cos 50

Dy 83.71 ft

DVert 400 cos IAVG


Dz 400 cos19

Dz 378.21 ft
11

The Average Angle Method


At Point D,
x = 1,000 + 99.76 = 1,099.76 ft
y = 1,000 + 83.71 = 1,083.71 ft
z = 3,500 + 378.21 = 3,878.21 ft
12

The Balanced Tangential Method


This method treats half the measured distance
(DMD/2) as being tangent to I1 and A1 and the
remainder of the measured distance (DMD/2) as
being tangent to I2 and A2.
DMD
sin I1 sin A1 sin I2 sin A2
2

DMD
sin I1 cos A1 sin I2 cos A2
DNorth
2

DEast

DMD
cos I2 cos I1
DVert
2

From: API Bulletin D20. Dec. 31, 1985

13

The Balanced Tangential Method


DMD
sin IC sin A C sin ID sin AD
DEast
2

400

sin 14o sin 20o sin 24o sin 80o


2

Dx 96.66 ft
14

The Balanced Tangential Method

DMD
sin IC cos A C sin ID cos AD
DNorth
2

400
o
o
o
o

sin 14 cos 20 sin 24 cos 80


2

Dy 59.59 ft
15

The Balanced Tangential Method

DMD
DVert
2

cos ID

cos IC

400

cos 24 o cos 14 o
2

Dz 376.77 ft
16

The Balanced Tangential Method


At Point D,
x = 1,000 + 96.66 = 1,096.66 ft
y = 1,000 + 59.59 = 1,059.59 ft
z = 3,500 + 376.77 = 3,876.77 ft
17

Minimum Curvature Method

18

Minimum Curvature Method


This method smooths the two straight-line segments
of the Balanced Tangential Method using the Ratio
Factor RF.
2
b
RF tan
b
2

(DL= b and must be in radians)

DMD
sin I1 sin A1 sin I2 sin A2 RF
DEast
2
DMD
sin I1 cos A1 sin I2 cos A2 RF
DNorth
2

DMD
cos I1 cos I2 RF
DVert
2
19

Minimum Curvature Method


The Dogleg Angle, b, is given by:
cos b cos ID IC sin IC sin ID 1 cos(AD A C )

cos 24 o 14 o sin 14 o sin 24 0 1 cos(800 20o )

cos b = 0.9356

b = 20.67 = 0.3608 radians


o

20

Minimum Curvature Method


The Ratio Factor,
2
b
RF tan
b
2
20.67o
2

RF
tan
0.3608
2

RF 1.0110
21

Minimum Curvature Method


DMD
sin IC sin A C sin ID sin AD RF
DEast
2

400
o
o
o
o

sin 14 sin 20 sin 24 sin 80 1.0110


2

96.66 * 1.011 97.72 ft

Dx 97.72 ft
22

Minimum Curvature Method


DMD
sin IC cos A C sin ID cos AD RF
DNorth
2

400

sin 14o cos 20o sin 24o cos 80o 1.0110


2

59.59 * 1.011 60.25 ft

Dy 60.25 ft
23

Minimum Curvature Method


DMD
DVert
2

cos ID

cos IC RF

400

cos 24 o cos 14 o 1.0110


2

376.77 * 1.0110 380.91 ft

Dz 380.91 ft
24

Minimum Curvature Method

At Point D,
x = 1,000 + 97.72 = 1,097.72 ft
y = 1,000 + 60.25 = 1,060.25 ft
z = 3,500 + 380.91 = 3,880.91 ft
25

The Radius of Curvature Method


DMD cos IC cos ID cos A C cos AD 180
DEast

ID IC AD A C

400 cos 14 cos 24 cos 20 cos 80 180

24 14 80 20

o

Dx 95.14 ft
26

The Radius of Curvature Method


DMD (cos IC cos ID ) (sin AD sin A C ) 180
DNorth

(ID IC ) ( AD A C )

400(cos14 cos 24 )(sin 80 sin 20

(24 14)(80 20)

) 180

Dy 79.83 ft
27

The Radius of Curvature Method


DMD (sin ID sin IC ) 180
DVert

ID IC

400 (sin 24 o sin 14 o ) 180

24 14

Dz 377.73 ft
28

The Radius of Curvature Method


At Point D,
x = 1,000 + 95.14 = 1,095.14 ft
y = 1,000 + 79.83 = 1,079.83 ft
z = 3,500 + 377.73 = 3,877.73 ft
29

The Tangential Method


Measured depth from C to D, DMD 400 ft

IC 14

ID 24

A C 20

A D 80

DEast DMD sin ID sin A D


400 sin24 sin 80

Dx 160.22 ft
30

The Tangential Method


DNorth DMD sin ID cos A D
400 sin 24 o cos 80o

Dy 28.25 ft
DVert DMD cos ID

400 cos 24

Dz 365.42 ft
31

The Tangential Method


At Point D,
x 1,000 160.22 1,160.22 ft
y 1,000 28.25 1,028.25 ft
z 3,500 365.42 3,865.42 ft
32

Summary of Results (to the nearest ft)

x
Average Angle

1,100

1,084

3,878

Balanced Tangential 1,097

1,060

3,877

Minimum Curvature 1,098

1,060

3,881

Radius of Curvature 1,095

1,080

3,878

Tangential Method

1,028

3,865

1,160

33

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen