Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Where
are
the
women
in
the
water
pipeline?
Wading
out
of
the
Shallows
Women
and
Water
Leadership
in
Georgia
By
Imrana
Jalal*
Introduction
Gender
inequality
in
water
utilities
has
the
effect
of
causing
a
lack
of
motivation
for
women
to
work
in
the
sector,
and
a
lack
of
innovation.
Female
customers
needs
are
also
not
reflected
in
the
provision
of
water
services,
says
Nino
Abuladze,
a
United
Water
Supply
Company
of
Georgia
LLC
(UWSCG)
employee
charged
with
the
responsibility
of
monitoring
the
integrating
of
gender
equality
into
the
company.
It
is
widely
accepted
that
water
projects
planned
and
implemented
with
the
complete
and
genuine
participation
of
women
are
more
sustainable
and
effective
than
those
without.1
Research
by
the
World
Bank
and
the
International
Red
Cross
(IRC)
International
Water
and
Sanitation
Center,
of
community
water
and
sanitation
projects
in
88
projetcs,
found
that
those
designed
and
run
with
the
full
collaboration
of
women
are
more
sustainable.2
Another
study
by
the
Inter-agency
Task
Force
on
Gender
and
Water
demonstrated
that
when
women
are
trained
to
contribute
to
asset
management,
there
is
greater
sustainability
of
assets
due
to
improved
operations
and
maintenance.3
In
a
like
manner,
some
Asian
Development
Bank
(ADB)-
supported
projects
designed
to
increase
womens
decision
making
in
community-based
organizations
(CBOs),
such
as
water
user
associations,
farmer
groups,
self-help
groups,
and
sanitation
committees,
have
led
to
improvements
in
community
water
infrastructure,
water
supply,
and
sanitation.4
All
water
projects
need
not
only
the
participation
of
women,
but
their
leadership
as
well.
To
narrow
the
gender
gap
in
leadership
at
all
levels
of
the
water
sector,
there
needs
to
be
more
women
involved
in
decision
making.
However,
there
is
a
gender
gap
in
water
management
leadership
at
all
levels
of
water
governancenational,
municipal,
and
localand
it
encompasses
water
utilities.
The
UWSCG
describes
the
water
sector
in
Georgia
as
male
dominated
and
that
much
work
remains
to
be
done
in
Georgia,
and
within
the
UWSCG
itself,
says
Ucha
Dzimistarishvili,
Head
of
the
Donor
Relations
Department.
Women
are
rarely
involved
in
decisions
relating
to
water
policies
and
strategies,
water
resource
management,
or
tariff
setting
and
technology
choices.
They
are
missing
in
key
areas
of
water-
*
Senior
Social
Development
Specialist
(Gender
and
Development),
ADB
with
inputs
from
Sanjay
Joshi,
Senior
Urban
Development
Specialist
and
Shanny
Campbell,
Senior
Social
Development
Specialist
(Gender
and
Development
)
related
decision
making,
and
in
the
scientific
and
technical
subsectors
from
which
female
water
leaders
are
likely
to
emerge.
150,000
women.
A
significant
number
of
families
and
women
will
benefit
from
new
water
supply
and
sanitation,
improved
sanitation
and
hygiene
knowledge,
and
a
greater
knowledge
capacity
in
water
efficiency
and
use.
A
sex-disaggregated
customer
database
has
been
established
allowing
the
company
to
design
awareness
campaigns
that
are
gender
inclusive
and
targeted
for
greater
effectiveness.
In
October
2015,
two
years
after
the
GAP
implementation
commenced,
the
project
has
resulted
in
101
female
employees
being
trained,
of
whom
84
are
Service
Center
staff,
out
of
a
total
of
321,
constituting
31%
against
a
target
of
30%.
The
training
also
targeted
women-only
training
of
potential
leaders
and
managers.
A
Human
Resources
expert
company
was
hired
to
design
a
performance
system
to
identify
gaps,
develop
an
incentive
system
and
enable
talented
women
to
be
promoted.
The
most
elusive
target
to
reach
in
the
GAP
has
been
30%
females
in
management.
At
the
time
of
this
report
in
October
2015,
the
total
number
of
employees
is
2,745
of
whom
647
are
female
(23%
against
a
target
of
30%),
and
of
whom
25
women
out
of
268
in
total
are
managers,
at
around
9%
against
a
target
of
30%.
In
comparison,
the
head
office
of
UWSCG
has
32%
female
staff
(of
386
employees)
of
whom
21%
(17)
hold
managerial
positions.
At
the
Service
Centers,
8
women
out
of
190
in
total
are
managers.
Table:
Male-female
participation
rates
in
UWSCG
&
management
positions
vs.
GAP
female
targets
Total
Men
%
Women
%
Gender
Action
Plan
Female
Target
Number
of
employees
2,745
2,098
76
647
23
30%
No.
of
managers
268
243
90
25
9
30%
No.
of
employees
in
head
office
386
259
67
127
32
30%
No
of
managers
in
head
office
78
61
78
17
21
30%
77
95
520
8
22
4
68
101
106
31
100
64
18
36
94
79
30%
5
Oh
sister,
where
art
thou?
Challenges
to
womens
leadership
in
the
water
sector
Box.
Female
Engineers
Have
their
Say
This
sector
is
very
male
oriented.
When
we
were
doing
our
engineering
training
we
were
only
a
small
number
of
women,
in
fact
a
complete
minority.
A
big
challenge
now
is
trying
to
balance
our
domestic
responsibilities
with
demanding
paid
work,
said
Medea
Dondua,
an
energy
engineer
and
Eka
Murjikneli,
a
water
engineer.
Dondua
did
not
really
have
any
parental
support
in
choosing
this
discipline
at
University
but
she
persevered
anyway.
Murjikneli
was
in
a
class
of
28,
of
whom
2
were
women.
I
have
twin
toddlers
aged
5
and
to
try
to
keep
up
with
both
responsibilities,
work
and
child
care
is
tough
said
Murjikneli.
We
are
lucky
we
have
a
very
understanding
male
head
of
department
who
has
children
himself
so
he
understands.
That
is
not
always
the
case.
Our
company
is
actually
good
to
women;
the
real
challenge
is
getting
more
women
into
technical
and
engineering
schools
and
making
it
attractive
to
them.
Flexible
working
arrangements
are
actually
critical.
said
Dondua.
The
company
is
already
implementing
a
range
of
good
practices
and
is
supportive
of
a
range
of
measures.
Going
forward
it
could
consider
providing
young
university
graduates
with
practical
training,
apprenticeships,
internships,
or
short-term
job
placements
in
its
company
or
related
technical
departments
to
give
them
practical
experience
and
an
overview
of
the
sector.
This
is
necessary
to
ensure
that
women
are
out
of
the
shallows
and
to
develop
a
critical
mass
of
leadership
positions.
1
ADB.
2014.
ADB
Briefs
Number
24.
December
2014.
Women,
Water
and
Leadership.
Manila.
B.
Gross,
C.
van
Wijk,
and
N.
Mukherjee.
2000.
Linking
Sustainability
with
Demand,
Gender
and
Poverty:
A
Study
in
Community-Managed
Water
Supply
Projects
in
15
Countries.
Delft:
Water
and
Sanitation
Program.
3
Inter-agency
Task
Force
on
Gender
and
Water.
2006.
Gender,
Water
and
Sanitation:
A
Policy
Brief.
New
York:
United
Nations
Department
of
Economic
and
Social
Affairs
(UN/DESA).
4
ADB.
2014.
ADB
Experiences:
Womens
Participation
and
Voice
in
Community-Based
Organizations.
Manila.
5
ADB.
2014.
ADB
Briefs
Number
24.
December
2014.
Women,
Water
and
Leadership.
Manila.
6
Womens
Information
Center
of
Georgia.
2012.
Presentation
on
the
Information-Education
Campaign
(IEC)
on
Water,
Sanitation
and
Hygiene
in
Marneuli
and
Mestia
by
Elene
Rusetskaia,
Director
of
Women's
Information
Center.
11
April.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtcrhsPahHM
2