Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695
ABSTRACT
A promising and facile approach to develop low pH
whey proteins gels with tailored properties has been
conducted
using
enzymatic
modification.
Transglutaminase enzyme induced chemical
crosslinks when incubated with whey protein
solution at pH 8. Rheology, size exclusion
chromatography
along
with
electrophoresis
experiments showed large aggregate formation.
Acidification of the whey protein polymers to pH 4
induced gelation. Rheological properties of the
modified gels (prepared via Transglutaminase
crosslinking then slow acidification) showed higher
elasticity than the conventional heat-treated gel
(prepared via heating to 85 oC for 1 hr). Preheating
the whey protein solution before Transglutaminase
crosslinking caused even higher elasticity. Similar
trends were observed in water holding capacity. TG
incubated preheated gels exhibited the largest
capacity and conventional gels the lowest,
suggesting the presence of finest structure in the
former.
1 INTRODUCTION
Whey proteins (WP) are important food ingredients
that are used in a number of food products that
include dairy products, confectionary, and desserts.
WP compose about 20% of bovine milk and are
generally produced as a co-product of the cheese
industry. The utilization of WP has been an
important research focus over the past few decades
because of its abundance and excellent nutritional
value [1-3].
WP gelation is of considerable interest because it
can provide new food products with unique
functional performance, favorable texture, as well as
flavor enhancement properties [4, 5]. Whey protein
gels are most commonly produced using heat
treatment [6-8]. However, gelation of WP can be
produced with or without heating through salt
addition [9], pH adjustment [10], and enzyme
treatment [11-16].
WP gels in acidic conditions (pH < 4.6) remain
largely unutilized because of their weak and brittle
nature in contrast to the favorable elastic gels
produced at neutral or basic conditions. This is
mainly due to the absence of the strong covalent
chemical disulphide bonds at these acidic conditions
163
164
e) 5 hrs
d) 9 hrs
c) 5 hrs
b) 15 min
a) 0 min
pH 8 with Enzyme
pH 8 with No Enzyme
pH 7
pH 8
pH 7 with Enzyme
165
Enzyme treated
Enzyme treated
No enzyme
Conventional
Appearance
Opaque
Opaque
Translucent
166
4 CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we present a two-step approach to
develop low pH whey protein gels with tailored
properties. This involves enzymatic modification of
WP using TG at pH 8 followed by slow acidification
to pH 4. In addition, our studies at pH 8 as well as
that of TG treatment of preheated WP insights into
the role of chemical (enzyme catalyzed and
disulfide) crosslinks in WP gelation.
Acidic gels produced by TG treatment had higher
elastic modulus, higher dynamic yield stress, and
higher water holding capacity than the conventional
heat-treated gels. These properties are further
improved by preheating the whey protein prior to TG
treatment.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors acknowledge Southeast Dairy Food
Research Center for funding the projects, Davisco
Foods Int. for supplying the WP, and Ajinomoto co.
for supplying the TG enzyme.
REFERENCES
1.
DeWit, J.N. and G. Klarenbeek, Effects of
various heat treatments on structure and solubility of
whey proteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 1984.
67(11): p. 2701-10.
2.
Tziboula, A., et al., Microfiltration of milk
with ceramic membranes. Influence on casein
16.
Aboumahmoud, R. and P. Savello,
Crosslinking of whey protein by transglutaminase.
Journal of Dairy Science, 1990. 73(2): p. 256-63.
17.
Errington, A.D. and E.A. Foegeding, Factors
Determining Fracture Stress and Strain of FineStranded Whey Protein Gels. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry, 1998. 46(8): p. 2963-2967.
18.
Dickinson, E., Enzymic crosslinking as a
tool for food colloid rheology control and interfacial
stabilization. Trends in Food Science & Technology,
1997. 8(10): p. 334-339.
19.
Anon, Use of a transglutaminase modified
protein as a fat replacer in foods. Research
Disclosure, 1995. 369: p. 16.
20.
Eisenberg, D., et al., Hydrophobic moments
in protein structure. Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc.,
1982. 17: p. 109-120.
21.
Wilcox, C.P. and H.E. Swaisgood,
Modification of the Rheological Properties of Whey
Protein Isolate through the Use of an Immobilized
Microbial Transglutaminase. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry, 2002. 50(20): p. 5546-5551.
22.
Sharma, R., P.C. Lorenzen, and K.B. Qvist,
Influence of transglutaminase treatment of skim milk
on the formation of .vepsiln.-(.gamma.glutamyl)lysine and the susceptibility of individual
proteins towards crosslinking. International Dairy
Journal, 2001. 11(10): p. 785-793.
23.
Han, X.-Q., J.K. Pfeifer, and R.H. Lincourt,
Process for making a wheyless cream cheese using
transglutaminase, in U.S. 2002, (Kraft Foods
Holdings, Inc., USA). Us. p. 16 pp.
24.
Verheul, M. and S.P.F.M. Roefs, Structure
of whey protein gels, studied by permeability,
scanning electron microscopy and rheology. Food
Hydrocolloids, 1998. 12(1): p. 17-24.
25.
Bowland, E.L. and E.A. Foegeding, Effects
of anions on thermally induced whey protein isolate
gels. Food Hydrocolloids, 1995. 9(1): p. 47-56.
26.
Foegeding, E.A., The effect of cations on
rheological properties of whey protein gels. Food
Proteins: Struct. Funct., Symp. Food Proteins
\"Struct.-Funct. Relat.\", 4th, 1993: p. 341-3.
27.
Faergemand, M., J. Otte, and K.B. Qvist,
Emulsifying properties of milk proteins cross-linked
with microbial transglutaminase. International Dairy
Journal, 1998. 8(8): p. 715-723.
28.
Schein, C.H., Solubility as a function of
protein structure and solvent components. Biotech.,
1990. 8(4): p. 308-17.
29.
Folk, J.E. and P.W. Cole,
Transglutaminase: mechanistic features of the
active site as determined by kinetic and inhibitor
studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1966. 122(2): p.
244-64.
30.
Hudson, H.M., C.R. Daubert, and E.A.
Foegeding, Rheological and Physical Properties of
Derivatized Whey Protein Isolate Powders. Journal
of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2000. 48(8): p.
3112-3119.
167