DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SPERM DNA FRAGMENTATION AND SPERM HIGHMAGNIFICATION FOR PREDICTING OUTCOME OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
TREATMENT (#2)
A Journal Review Paper submitted to the
Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science Department San Pedro College of Davao 12 C. Guzman St. Davao City
Submitted by Dave Michael C. Marimon Group 4 Bacteriology Davao Regional Medical Center
November 2015
INTRODUCTION
Infertility is a common condition affecting one in six couples of
childbearing age. The common definition for male infertility is the presence of an alteration in concentration, motility and/or morphology in at least one sample of two sperm analyses, according to World Health Organization guidelines. Basic semen analysis may not provide all information to completely evaluate male fertility status. Consequently, several investigators have considered optimizing conventional routine methods to improve male infertility diagnoses. Over the last two decades, the main investigation areas have been focused on sperm function, morphology and nucleus assessment. Major advances in the field of male infertility have been achieved, and these advances have resulted in numerous techniques for evaluating sperm chromatin quality and DNA fragmentation. Sperm DNA fragmentation is increasingly suggested as a promising fertility predictive factor. Although there are some studies with opposite results, most of the published works report the association between DNA damage and lower fertilization, impaired embryo cleavage and higher miscarriage rates.
This study talks about the diagnostic usefulness of sperm DNA
integrity and sperm vacuolization for predicting outcome in infertile couples undergoing IVF and ICSI treatments. The researchers have gathered certain numbers of couples that are willing to participate and with informed consent in this program as a treatment for their infertility. The proper collection of semen samples was correctly implemented in order to achieve a reliable results. They performed the DNA Fragmentation Assay and sperm morphology assessment. I find it interesting that the researchers have considered the assessment of DNA damage as a possible prediction that a male is indeed infertile. It has been stated that simple sperm analysis may not fully provide all necessary information that could verify if a male is infertile. This test is a good promising factor to detect cases of infertility, and with our current advancements in laboratory tests such as improved version of the sperm chromatin dispersion test using a standardized staining procedure and with a skillful laboratory scientist, it can easily be performed. I also find the results of this test a good standard that when spermatozoa conserved the integrity of DNA, a peripheral halo of DNA loops around a central core was observed. Spermatozoa with fragmented DNA produced very small halos or no halos at all. I wondered how much it would cost to engage in DNA Fragmentation Test in order to confirm if one is infertile or not. Given the possible interference or false results in a basic sperm analysis, approximately only a little chance that would confirm that a male is infertile. IVF is already an expensive procedure, so I think the couple must find ways to assess if the result would turn out to have a healthy baby. According to this study, the assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation was a better predictor of IVF success than assessment of sperm using high magnification. Although several studies have shown the prognostic and diagnostic limitations of the routine semen parameters for the infertile couple, male infertility diagnosis is still based on the traditional semen analysis in routine clinical practice. However, these conventional semen parameters do not identify the subtle abnormalities in the male genome characterized by damaged sperm DNA.