Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Currencies: A Primer
W H I T E PA P E R
I NV ESTMENT MANAG E M E N T & G U IDAN C E
KEY IMPLICATIONS
The global economic crisis of 2008 was a humbling and painful experience
for many. In its wake, more than ever investors are seeking non-correlated
assets that can deliver consistent returns and help protect against downside
risks. One such type of asset that is familiar to everyone, but is typically not
thought of as an investment, is currencies.
Ironically, the largest financial market in the world is also one of the least understood.
In this paper, we attempt to demystify this important market by examining the basics
of currency investing and its impact on a traditional portfolio.
E VO LV I N G RO L E S O F F O R E I G N E XC H A N G E
Historically, currencies have performed two functions critical for society: serve as a unit
of account and act as a medium of exchange. And since money assumed different forms in
different places, there was always a parallel need for foreign exchange. For millennia, the
foreign exchange market has provided a forum for commercial activities between peoples.
Not much changed through the ages until the early 1970s, when the breakdown of the
Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates gave birth to the modern FX market.
For the first time, the price of currencies would be set according to the forces of supply
and demand. Exchange rate risk became an inescapable consequence of cross-border
commerce and investing. Currency suddenly had two new roles: as a tool for hedging
foreign exchange exposure and an instrument for speculation the most famous
example being the $1.2 billion in profits hedge fund manager George Soros netted
shorting the British pound in 1992.
Bank of International Settlements (BIS), Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA)
This material was prepared by the Investment Management & Guidance Group (IMG) and is not a publication of BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. The views expressed are those of IMG only and
are subject to change. This information should not be construed as investment advice. It is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to be either a specific offer by any Merrill
Lynch entity to sell or provide, or a specific invitation for a consumer to apply for, any particular retail financial product or service that may be available. Merrill Lynch Wealth Management makes
available products and services offered by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S) and other subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation.
Investment products provided:
MLPF&S is a registered broker-dealer, Member SIPC and a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation.
2012 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved.
Figure 1: B
rief history of currency markets
90006000 B.C.
500 B.C.
1800s-1930s
Post WWII1970s
1980s2000s
Present
The concept of beta is akin to a rising tide raising all boats. It represents the market return.
Financial theory says returns on any portfolio can be decomposed into these two basic components, alpha () and beta (), and an error term, epsilon (), which denotes random
events or noise (which may sometimes be positive, sometimes negative). Statistical analyses can help differentiate whether a portfolios excess return over the market (beta) is the
result of true managerial skill, , or chance, .
2
3
WHITEPAPER
market, and foreign tourists, are examples of liquidityseekers. Significantly, the presence of these two distinct
groups means that a currency beta can, in fact, exist.
Of course, the above description ignores an important
component of the FX market: dealer banks that act as
intermediaries between the profit-seekers and liquidityseekers. These are usually large commercial and
investment banks that take the other side of transactions
initiated by either party. For providing liquidity to the
market, they receive a positive bid-ask spread.4 (Note,
our poker example still holds in this tri-party framework.
It is the equivalent of playing poker at a club, where the
house dealer takes a percentage of the winnings or
charges a fixed fee per hand.)
From theory to practice: Are profit-seekers profitable?
The idea of a two-tier market of profit-seekers and
liquidity-seekers is intuitive, but is it an accurate
description of the FX market in practice? Empirical studies
using futures data published by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC) indeed confirm that one
group systematically profits at the expense of the another.
The results of one such study by the Reserve Bank of
Australia are reproduced in Table 1.
Table 1: A
verage weekly profits by trader type 1993-2003
(in US$ millions)*
Non-commercial/profitseekers
Gross Profit
Commercial hedgers/
liquidity-seekers
Net Profit**
Gross Profit
Australian Dollar
0.45
0.41
-0.72
British Pound
0.05
-0.21
-0.58
Canadian dollar
0.62
0.46
-0.63
Euro (1999-2004)
4.97
4.51
-7.71
3.63
2.93
-5.71
Japanese yen
5.42
4.65
-8.62
Swiss franc
1.85
1.43
-3.52
Total
12.72
10.44
-20.84
Source: Kearns, J. and Manners, P. (2004). The Profitability of Speculators in Currency Futures
Markets. Reserve Bank of Australia. *The CFTC data only report the positions of large speculators
and hedgers (holding more than 400 contracts). These large traders account for about 70% of the
total value of positions in the currency futures markets considered in the study. The remaining
contracts fall into a residual category so that total profits sum to zero.
**Assumes transaction costs of 0.03%.
Figure 2: D
aily turnover in the FX market by source
(in $billions)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
$300
$500
$300
$1,900
$1,000
$1,500
1998
Banks
Investment Funds
2010
The bid-ask spread is difference between the price at which a dealer is willing to buy, and the price at which he is willing to sell a currency pair. Note, that in addition to their role as
market makers, dealings banks have traditionally run separate proprietary trading desks that take directional bets on currency movements using the banks own capital. These activities
have generally been small compared to the client business and have shrunk further in light of new legislation that limits proprietary trading by banks, such as the Volcker Rule.
WHITEPAPER
Bank 1
Hedge Fund
Bank 2
$3,500
$3,324
$3,000
$2,500
$1,934
$2,000
$1,527
$1,500
$1,000
$3,980
$4,000
$500
$1,499,500
1,000,000
$1,499,600
1,000,000
1,000,000
$4,500
Network of FX dealers
$1,500,000
In addition to the above fundamental factors, day-today FX activity is also affected by traders reacting to
technical indicators that utilize past prices and trading
volumes to predict where currencies will be in the near
future. Commonly followed technical signals include:
support and resistance support levels, moving average
crossovers, head-and-shoulder formations, etc. Tellingly,
more than 90% of FX traders report using some form of
technical analysis to make trading decisions.6
Chart 2: D
aily turnover in the FX markets by instrument
in Billions
ABC Co.
$0
$1,190
$590
1989
$1,239
$820
1992
Spot
transactions
1995
1998
Outright
forwards
2001
2004
2007
Foreign exchange
swaps
2010
Other
Source: BIS
WHITEPAPER
WHITEPAPER
Russia
Indonesia
South Africa
China
(2.55)
(2.46)
(2.45)
(2.44)
-50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Price in $
Source: The Economist (http://bigmacindex.org/2012-big-mac-index.html)
*Exchange rates as of January 12, 2012.
Capital Gain:
$23,500
Interest income: $25,208
Total Profit*:
$48,708
Sell AUD/JPY
Rush to unwind
the carry
Buy AUD/JPY
* Calculations are based on the purchase of 1 standard lot of AUD/JPY with notional of 100,000
units. We assume no leverage was used.
Source: Bloomberg, IMG
Most currency managers employ some form of trendfollowing or momentum strategy. Currencies often
exhibit trending behavior (i.e., display serial correlation)
that suggests past prices can be informative of future
movements. Rather than forecast where currencies are
headed, trend-following managers seek to ride existing
trends until they reverse.8 Managers often employ
technical indicators to detect trends. One basic technique
is the simple moving average (SMA). Applying a 50-day
SMA to the USD/JPY pair in Figure 4, an investor would
buy the pair anytime the exchange rate crossed its 50-day
moving average from below and sell it whenever price
crossed the same from above.
Trends can endure over a wide range of time periods,
appearing and disappearing in less than a day to lasting
for months. Furthermore, not all currency pairs trend (e.g.,
USD/CAD,USD/AUD, and EUR/CHF), and others may
do so only over certain periods. A key deficiency of trendfollowing models is that they are (by necessity) backwardlooking and work on the assumption that the near future
will be similar to the recent past, potentially exposing
managers to sharp market corrections and false trading
signals that add to costs.
Finally, volatility-based strategies are non-directional
strategies that seek to profit regardless of the direction
currencies take. Just as traders utilize derivatives to take
advantage of the equity markets implied volatility, traders
make use of equivalent measures in the FX market. One
counterpart to the well-known VIX index is Deutsche
Banks CVIX, which tracks the expected future volatility
in currency markets, and can be used to take directional
views on FX fluctuations. Volatility strategies typically
86
90
80
84
70
60
VIX Index
USD/JPY
82
80
78
Buy
signals
(green)
76
74
Dec-10
Mar-11
Jun-11
USD/JPY
* Simple moving-average. Source: Bloomberg, IMG
Sep-11
Dec-11
Mar-12
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dec-01
Dec-03
50-day MA
Dec-05
VIX Index
Dec-07
Dec-09
25
23
21
19
17
15
13
11
9
7
5
Dec-11
DB CVIX Index
CVIX Index
Conceptually, all that is happening is that a trader borrows yen from a Japanese institution, converts the loan into Australian dollars (AUD), and invests in higher yielding Australian
government securities. Once the investment matures the investor converts the proceeds back into Yen to pay back the original loan.
8
For a general discussion on the why trends exists in financial markets contrary to theory, see the whitepaper Hedge Fund Strategies: A Managed Futures Primer (2011) from Merrill
Lynch Global Wealth Management
7
WHITEPAPER
H OW D O T H E F X S TR ATE G I E S PE R F O R M?
In a decade marked by the bursting of two asset bubbles
and increased volatility, the currency strategies described
above performed rather well. We used four Barclays
investable FX indexes the Barclays Intelligent Carry,
Barclays Adaptive FX Trend, Barclays FX Value, and
Barclays Tactical SBeta as respective proxies for these
styles, and examined their performance over the twelve
year-period from 2000-2011.9 Table 2 displays the results of
our analyses. The FX composite in the table is simply an
equalweighted average of these four strategies.
The first statistic that stands out is that currencies
clearly outperformed equities in our sample period, which
included both historic bull and bear markets. Moreover, the
discrepancy in performance between foreign exchange and
stocks was higher during bear markets. Second, we see
that foreign exchange, as measured by the composite, has
lower volatility than equities, giving rise to substantially
stronger risk-adjusted returns.
T H E RO L E O F C U R R E N C I E S I N A
PORTFOLIO
While the potential for enhanced returns is certainly an
attractive proposition for investors, ultimately the most
important contribution of currencies may be their ability to
reduce portfolio volatility and drawdown.
Harry Markowitzs (1952) mean-variance framework
is a good starting point for any discussion of portfolio
allocation. The key lesson of Markowitzs seminal work was
that within a portfolio it is not essential what the risks of
the individual assets are, but rather what is crucial is the
extent to which the returns of those assets are correlated
with one another.
In that regard currencies can be particularly effective
portfolio diversifiers. From Table 3, we can clearly see
that currencies exhibit extremely low or even negative
correlation to most other asset classes.
Trend
Value
Volatility
FX
Composite*
U.S.
Equities
Annual Returns
6.9%
6.1%
3.7%
9.5%
6.7%
1.0%
Volatility
6.1%
5.4%
5.9%
6.1%
3.3%
16.3%
0.77
0.71
0.27
1.15
1.28
0.01
-19.7%
-6.2%
-16.4%
-6.4%
-3.9%
-50.9%
Kurtosis
0.39
0.30
6.34
2.40
0.48
0.69
Skew
-0.29
0.03
1.13
0.47
-0.18
-0.45
14.8%
12.1%
10.5%
14.0%
13.0%
-4.2%
(6.0%)
(5.7%)
(4.9%)
(7.8%)
(3.3%)
(17.9%)
Sharpe Ratio
Max Drawdown
Returns (Volatility)
2000-2003
2004-2007
2008-2011
U.S.
U.S.
Bonds Credit
Currencies
1.00
U.S. Bonds
-0.06
1.00
U.S. Credit
-0.05
0.87
1.00
U.S. Equity
-0.04
-0.08
0.19
1.00
8.9%
3.9%
2.4%
9.7%
6.3%
9.2%
-0.07
0.15
0.51
0.65
1.00
(5.9%)
(5.1%)
(5.4%)
(4.0%)
(2.9%)
(7.6%)
Commodities
0.05
-0.01
0.13
0.30
0.28
1.00
-2.1%
2.7%
-1.1%
5.1%
1.2%
-1.6%
(5.5%)
(5.1%)
(6.8%)
(5.9%)
(3.1%)
(20.6%)
Cash
0.25
0.07
-0.03
-0.06
-0.15
0.02
Source: Bloomberg, IMG. Carry, Trend, Value, and Volatility indexes represented by Barclays Intelligent
Carry USD, Barclays Adaptive FX Trend TR, Barclays FX Value Convergence, and Barclays Tactical
SBeta Indexes, respectively. *FX Composite based on the equal-weighted average of the four
strategies described above.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Cash
1.00
Source: Bloomberg, IMG. Currencies, US Bonds, US Credit, US Equity, US High Yield, Commodities,
and Cash are represented by the FX Composite calculated in Table 2, BarCap US Aggregate Bond
Index, BarCap US Aggregate Credit Index, S&P 500 Index, BarCap US Corporate High Yield Index,
SP Goldman Sachs Commodities Index, and Citigroup 3 Month Treasury Bill Index, respectively.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Full definitions of these strategies are available in the glossary at the end of this report.
WHITEPAPER
Global Credit
Crisis
n12
Ja
n11
Ja
n10
n09
Currencies
Global HY (USD)
Ja
Ja
n08
Ja
n06
n07
Ja
Ja
n05
Ja
n03
n04
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
n02
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
-0.20
-0.40
-0.60
-0.80
-1.00
n01
Figure 6: 1
2-month rolling correlations of the S&P 500 with
other assets (2001-2011)
Commodities
Global Equities
Source: Bloomberg, IMG. Currencies, commodities, global equities, and global high yield
represented by the FX composite as defined on page 7, SP Goldman Sachs Commodity
Index, MSCI AC World Index xUS, and BofA ML Global High Yield USD Index, respectively. Past
performance is no guarantee of future results.
just with other assets, but also with each other. We found
that the average pair-wise correlation of the four currency
strategies was just 0.10 from 2000 through 2011.
An oasis of liquidity
Another characteristic of currencies that should be very
appealing to investors is the liquidity of the FX market.
During the last credit crisis, many financial markets
experienced significant disruptions and spikes in volatility.
While bid-ask spreads on major currency pairs did rise,
much of the FX market functioned relatively smoothly
during the crisis. In fact, according to the Bank of
International Settlements (BIS), many investors turned to
the FX market to hedge risks in other asset classes with
limited market liquidity. For instance, investors reportedly
attempted to hedge losses in U.S. equities by purchasing
the Japanese yen (which was gaining as the carry trade
was being unwound). Unlike in other financial markets,
where participants may choose to sit on the sidelines
during periods of high uncertainty, staple players of the
FX market such as corporations, governments, tourists,
etc., (liquidity-seekers) do not enjoy the same luxury. The
FX market essentially has captive participants, whose
presence allows investors to realize gains even in the most
difficult circumstances.
Quantifying the portfolio impact of currencies
To demonstrate how foreign exchange can affect the risk
and returns of a conventional portfolio, we examined the
performance of a portfolio of U.S. stocks and bonds with
different allocations to currencies from 2000 through
2011. This particular period includes both historic bull and
bear markets and is helpful in highlighting the impact of
currencies over different segments over the market cycle.
Figure 7: P
erformance during the worst U.S. stock and bond periods (20002011)
1%
2%
4%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
0%
-1%
-1%
-2%
-10%
-12%
-2%
Bottom 20%
Bottom 10%
Monthly U.S Stock Returns
FX Composite
S&P 500
Bottom 5%
Bottom 20%
Bottom 10%
Bottom 5%
FX Composite
BarCap
We are reminded of the cautionary tale of the statistician who drowned while crossing a river that was on average just three feet deep.
10
WHITEPAPER
Table 4: B
enefits of adding FX to a traditional 60:40 portfolio
Traditional
Portfolio
10% FX
Allocation
15% FX
Allocation
20% FX
Allocation
U.S. Bonds
40%
36%
34%
32%
60%
54%
51%
48%
Currencies
0%
10%
15%
20%
Annualized Return
3.5%
3.9%
4.0%
4.2%
Annualized Volatility
2.8%
2.5%
2.4%
2.2%
Max Drawdown
-33%
-29%
-28%
-26%
Return/unit of Volatility
1.27
1.55
1.71
1.89
G A I N E X P O S U R E TO C U R R E N C I E S
Our analyses confirm many academic findings that
currencies can be an effective diversifying agent. The question
then is, how do investors actually allocate to foreign exchange?
In years past, there were few direct options. Foreign exchange
was the domain of institutional investors, where currency
pairs were traded in lots whose minimum investment size
was prohibitive to all but the biggest investors. Fortunately,
an important transformation in the FX market in recent years
has been its increased accessibility. Technological innovation
and product development now provide investors with a variety
of channels into foreign exchange.
Here, we list the basic ways investors can take on currency
exposure. A common but indirect way is through the
purchase of foreign securities. The returns on any foreign
stock or bond have two components that can be viewed
as assets within a portfolio: performance of the asset
itself and the change in exchange rate relative to the
home currency. How important is latter? Historically,
FX volatility has contributed more than 35% of the total
volatility of an international equity portfolio and more than
70% of the volatility of an international bond portfolio.12
To hedge or not to hedge?
To complicate matters, individual currencies can have
diverse and often complex relationships with local and
international financial markets. Certain currencies, such as
the U.S. dollar or Canadian dollar, are generally negatively
correlated with both local and global equity markets.
Others, such as the euro and yen, on the other hand tend
to be positively correlated (see Table 5). In general, when
correlations between these two components are negative
(positive), foreign investors realize a lower (higher) volatility
compared to their local counterparts in the same security.
Table 5: C
orrelations of major currency pairs with world
equity markets
Dollar
Index
Euro
S&P 500
-0.19 0.17
0.21
0.18
-0.05
-0.48
0.53
-0.11 0.07
0.25
0.13
0.08
-0.43
0.44
Nikkei 225
-0.15 0.11
0.23
0.20
-0.01
-0.38
0.47
FTSE 100
-0.14 0.11
0.25
0.11
0.04
-0.46
0.49
-0.05 0.00
0.27
0.11
0.16
-0.32
0.39
0.16
0.23
-0.09
-0.47
0.54
S&P/ASX 200
-0.21 0.17
0.19
0.24
-0.05
-0.42
0.48
MSCI ACWI
-0.36 0.32
0.15
0.33
-0.15
-0.59
0.65
Additionally, CVaR overcomes a key drawback of standard deviation by capturing only downside risk and investors asymmetric aversion to losses.
State Street Global Advisors industry estimates, 2009
11
12
WHITEPAPER
Table 6: C
omparing different vehicles to access currencies
Potential Benefits
Potential Drawbacks
Foreign stocks
Mgmt Style
Passive
Liquidity
Dividends
Foreign bonds
Passive
Liquidity
Income
Interest-rate risk
Credit risk of issuer
FX indexes (currency
baskets)
Passive
No alpha generation
Interest-rate risk
FX structured products
Passive
Customizable
Accessible to most investors
May offer some principal protection
No alpha generation
Capped upside gains
Interest-rate risk
ETFs/ ETNs
Passive
Liquidity
Accessible to most investors
No alpha generation
ETNs subject to credit risk
Currency derivatives
Active
Liquidity
Leverage (up to 100:1)
Commodity Trading
Advisors (CTAs)
Active
Active
Currency-specialist
hedge funds
Active
Source: IMG
Bernard, L. S. (2011, July 9). Is Currency Trading Worth the Risk? The Wall Street Journal.
13
10
WHITEPAPER
Adeptly
Selecting
Timing
Competently
CONCLUSION
The foreign exchange market is the largest and most liquid
financial market in the world. It is also one of the most
poorly understood and underexploited markets. While the
role of currencies has traditionally been limited to hedging
FX risks and speculation, there is now a growing consensus
that currencies can also make good portfolio investments.
S O M E R I S K S TO C O N S I D E R
Many hedge funds offer investors, at best, only quarterly redemptions, may require investors to lock up their investments for 1-2 years, and have minimum investments of $100,000 or more.
14
WHITEPAPER
11
REFERENCES
Bernard, L. S. (2011, July 9). Is Currency Trading Worth the Risk? The Wall Street
Journal.
Nadig, D. , Hougan, M. & Crigger, L. (2009). Currencies: The Overlooked Asset Class.
Journal of Indexes, 10-18.
Binny, J. (2005). Currency Management Style through the Ages. The Journal of
Alternative Investments, Vol. 8 (3), 52-59.
Eichengreen, B. (2011, March 1). Why the dollars reign is near an end. The Wall
Street Journal.
Hafeez, B. (2007). Currency Markets: Money Left on the Table? Deutsche Bank.
Osler, C. (2000). Support for Resistance: Technical Analysis and Intraday Exchange
Rates. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Review, Vol. 6 (2), 53-68.
Harris, L. (1993). The Winners and Losers of the Zero-Sum Game: The Origins of
Trading Profits, Price Efficiency and Market Liquidity. Institute for Quantitative
Research in Finance Spring 1993 Seminar. Wesley Chapel, FL.
King, M. R., Osler C. & Rime, D. (2011). Foreign exchange market structure, players
and evolution. Norges Bank.
King, M. R. & Dagfinn, R. (2010, December). The $4 trillion question: what explains
FX growth since the 2007 survey? BIS Quarterly Review, 27-42.
This document was prepared by GWIM Investment Management & Guidance (IMG) and is not a publication of BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Global Wealth & Investment
Management (GWIM), a division of Bank of America Corporation, includes the GWIM Investment Management & Guidance (GWIM IMG), which provides industry-leading investment
solutions, portfolio construction advice and wealth management guidance. The views expressed are those of GWIM IMG only and are subject to change. This document is neither
reviewed nor approved by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. The views and opinions expressed may differ from those of BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research or other departments
or divisions of Bank of America and its affiliates. Investors are urged to consult their financial advisor(s)/private wealth manager(s) before buying or selling any securities. This
information may not be current and GWIM IMG has no obligation to provide any updates or changes.
This document is being provided for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing herein is or should be construed as investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation of any
kind, a solicitation of clients, or an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to invest in alternative investments. An investment in an alternative investment may be offered only pursuant
to a funds offering documents. Certain information herein has been obtained from third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and
its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of this document.
This document was issued without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient and does not contain investment
recommendations. The opinions expressed are as of 6/30/2012, and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that views and opinions expressed in this
communication will come to pass.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
Any reference to a specific company or security does not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or directly invest in the company or its securities. It should not be assumed
that the recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities discussed in this document.
Some or all alternative investment programs may not be suitable for certain investors. No assurance can be given that any alternative investments investment objectives will be
achieved. Many alternative investment products are sold pursuant to exemptions from regulation and, for example, may not be subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual
funds. In addition to certain general risks identified below which are not exclusive, each product will be subject to its own specific risks, including strategy and market risk. Certain
alternative investments require tax reports on Schedule K-1 to be prepared and filed. As a result, investors will likely be required to obtain extensions for filing federal, state, and local
income tax returns each year.
Currency Note: The currency market affords investors a substantial degree of leverage, which provides the potential for substantial profits or losses. Such transactions entail a high
degree of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Currency fluctuations may also affect the value of an investment.
Commodities: There are special risks associated with an investment in commodities, including market price fluctuations, regulatory changes, interest rate changes, credit risk,
economic changes, and the impact of adverse political or financial factors. Investing in commodities or the securities of companies operating in the commodities market involves a
high degree of risk, including leveraging strategies and other speculative investment practices that may increase the risk of investment loss, including the principal value invested.
Investments may be highly illiquid and subject to high fees and expenses.
Derivatives: Derivative instruments may at times be illiquid, subject to wide swings in prices, difficult to value accurately and subject to default by the issuer. The risk of loss in trading
derivatives, including swaps, OTC contracts, and futures and forwards, can be substantial. There is no guarantee that this objective will be achieved. The use of hedging strategies may,
in certain circumstances, cause the value of a portfolio to appreciate or depreciate at a greater rate than if such techniques were not used, which in turn result in significant loss.
Diversification: Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.
Hedge Funds: Hedge funds are speculative and involve a high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. There is no secondary market
nor is one expected to develop for investments in hedge funds and there may be restrictions on transferring fund investments. Hedge funds may be leveraged and performance may
be volatile. Hedge funds have high fees and expenses that reduce returns. The characteristics discussed in this paper are typical attributes, as hedge funds and traditional funds
vary. Other key characteristics such as fees, minimum investments and liquidity should also be carefully considered. A hedge fund generally uses more aggressive strategies than a
traditional fund and entails a higher level or risk.
Managed Futures: Managed futures funds are speculative, involve a high degree of risk and are subject to substantial fees and expenses, which may offset trading profits. There can
be no assurance that any managed futures fund will achieve its objectives or avoid substantial or total losses. Since underlying positions held in managed futures funds may fluctuate
widely in value, individual funds can be highly volatile. Managed futures funds may also make significant use of leverage, adding to the volatility of a funds performance. Man-aged
futures funds may trade on unregulated markets lacking the regulatory protection of exchanges. Single-manager funds lack diversification and thus may involve higher risk. Since
many managed futures funds employ trend-following strategies, periods without clear trends in the market will typically be highly unfavorable to these funds. Managed futures funds
are subject to large drawdowns. The minimum margin requirements for various futures markets may subject investors to significant leverage. While margin-to equity levels are closely
managed to historic volatility ranges by the funds, investors should note that they are investing in securities on a leveraged basis. Be sure to read the entire Confidential Program
Disclosure Document as defined, which contains information concerning risk factors, conflicts, performance information and other material aspects.
12
WHITEPAPER
Options: Options can carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Investors should take special precautions to ensure that they understand thoroughly the risks
associated with options before engaging in option transactions. Because each option transaction produces a tax consequence, clients should discuss with their tax advisors how the
options transactions and any sales of underlying stock will affect their tax situation before investing.
Investors should bear in mind that the global financial markets are subject to periods of extraordinary disruption and distress. During the financial crisis of 2008-2009, many private
investment funds incurred significant or even total losses, suspended redemptions or otherwise severely restricted investor liquidity, including increasing the notice period required for
redemptions, instituting gates on the percentage of fund interests that could be redeemed in any given period and creating side-pockets and special purpose vehicles to hold illiquid
securities as they are liquidated. Other funds may take similar steps in the future to prevent forced liquidation of their portfolios into a distressed market. In addition, investment funds
implementing alternative investment strategies are subject to the risk of ruin and may become illiquid under a variety of circumstances, irrespective of general market conditions.
This material contains forward-looking statements about plans and expectations for the future. These statements may be identified by the use of words such as may, will, expect,
anticipate, estimate, believe, and continue. These statements are based on current plans and expectations. There is always the risk that actual events may differ materially from
those anticipated and that the forward-looking views may not come to pass. No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii)
distributed to any person that is not an employee, officer, director, or authorized agent of the recipient, without the prior written consent of Merrill Lynch.
Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or recommendation or solicitation of any products and services by Merrill Lynch. The information provided herein is intended for general
circulation and does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, the financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this information.
Recipients should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor before considering information herein in connection with any investment decision, or for a necessary
explanation of its contents.
In respect of certain investments, companies in the Merrill Lynch group have or may have a position or a material interest in any one or more of those investments and Merrill Lynch
is or may be the only market maker for such investments. Merrill Lynch, as a full service firm, may have, or may have had within the previous 12 months, business relationships with
or provided significant advice to providers of products and services mentioned.
Some products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all clients
INDEX DEFINITIONS
Indexes are unmanaged and their returns do not include sales charges or fees, which would lower performance. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. They are included here
for illustrative purposes. Performance represented by a hedge fund index is subject to a variety of material distortions, and investments in individual hedge funds involve material
risks that are not typically reflected by an index, including the risk of ruin. The indexes referred to herein do not reflect the performance of any account or fund managed by Merrill
Lynch or its affiliates, or of any other specific fund or account, are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any management or performance fees or expenses. One cannot
invest directly in an index.
Barclays Aggregate Bond Index: The Barclays Aggregate Bond Index comprises of government securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and corporate
securities to simulate the universe of bonds in the market. The maturity of the bonds in the index is over one year.
Barclays FX Value Convergence Index: The index takes long and short positions in G10 currencies. The underlying portfolio rebalances on a monthly basis, taking long positions in
currencies that appear undervalued against their PPP level, and short positions in overvalued currencies.
Barclays Capital Adaptive FX Trend Index: The index takes long and short positions in G10 currencies based on the direction of trend and individual currency pair volatility. The index
is rebalanced daily and has a target volatility of 5%.
Barclays Capital Tactical SBetaVol Index: The index uses a systematic ranking model to determine the weights of each of the forward volatility agreements in the index. The ranking
model generates buy or sell signals based on the expected return of each asset taking trading costs into account.
Barclays Capital Intelligent Carry Index: The index seeks to capture returns from the carry trade among the G10 currencies through interest rate differentials and forward bias. The
index is mean variance optimized, rebalanced monthly and constrained to a target volatility of 5%.
Barclays Currency Traders Index: An equal-weighted index of managed programs that trade currency futures and/or cash forwards in the inter bank market. As of 2012, there are
currently 108 managers included in the index.
Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index: The Barclays US Corporate High Yield TR Index is comprised of fixed-rate, publicly issued, non-investment grade debt.
BofA ML Global High Yield USD Index: The index tracks the performance of USD, CAD, GBP and EUR denominated below investment grade corporate debt publicly issued in the
major domestic or eurobond markets.
Deutsche Bank Currency Volatility Index (CVIX) is the Deutsche Bank Currency Volatility Index. Similarly to the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX), which measures
the implied volatility of equity markets (based on the S&P 500), CVIX measures the implied volatility of currency markets. Thus, it is a measure of the markets expectation of future
currency volatility and can be used as a benchmark of risk appetite. In order to give a broad representation of expected future volatility in currency markets, CVIX is calculated based
on a the 3m implied volatilities of 9 major currency pairs. The currency pairs and their weights are listed below: EURUSD 35.90% USDJPY 21.79% GBPUSD 17.95% USDCHF 5.13%
USDCAD 5.13% AUDUSD 6.14% EURJPY 3.85% EURGBP 2.56% EURCHF 1.28% CVIX contracts trade as futures.
MSCI AC World Index: The index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging
markets. It consists of 45 country indexes comprising of 24 developed and 21 emerging market country indexes.
S&P 500 Index: The S&P 500 Total Return Index is a market-weighted index that measures the total return, including price and dividends, of 500 leading companies in leading
industries of the U.S. economy. This index is often used as a reference for the performance of the U.S. equities market.
S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI): The Goldman Sachs Commodity Index is composed of futures contracts on 24 physical commodities. It reflects the return on fully
collateralized future positions. The index is calculated primarily on a world production-weighted basis and is comprised of the principal physical commodities that are the subject of
active, liquid futures markets.
The indexes referred to in the paper do not reflect the performance of any account or any specific fund, and do not reflect the deduction of any management or performance fees,
or expenses. One cannot invest directly in an index. The indexes shown are provided for illustrative purposes only. They do no represent benchmarks or proxies for the return of any
particular investable product. The alternative universe from which the components of the indexes are selected is based on funds that have continued to report results for a minimum
period of time. This prerequisite for fund selection interjects a significant element of survivor bias into the reported levels of the indexes, as generally, only successful funds will
continue to report for the required period, so that the funds from which the statistical analysis or the performance of the indexes to date is derived necessarily tend to have been
successful. There can, however, be no assurance that such funds will continue to be successful in the future.
Merrill Lynch assumes no responsibility for any of the foregoing performance information, which has been provided by the index sponsor. Neither Merrill Lynch nor the index sponsor
can verify the validity or accuracy of the self-reported returns of the managers used to calculate the index returns. Merrill Lynch does not guarantee the accuracy of the index returns
and does not recommend any investment or other decision based on the results presented.
WHITEPAPER
13
TECHNICAL TERMS
Alpha: The difference in return above or below the return of a target index.
Beta: A measure of the sensitivity of the returns of the fund to the comparative index. For example, a Beta of 2.0 would indicate that for every 1% move up in the comparative index,
the fund moved up 2% on average.
Bull Market: A condition marked by increased confidence and optimism in the market as reflected in the rising prices of securities. Many consider a 20% or more rise in prices in
multiple broad market indexes a bull market.
Correlation: Measures the extent of linear association of two variables. It quantifies the extent to which the fund and a comparative index move together.
Efficient Frontier: The efficient frontier tracks the relationship of rate of return and performance volatility (as measured by standard deviation). While performance volatility is one
widely accepted indicator of risk in traditional investment strategies, in the case of alternative investment strategies, performance volatility is an indicator of only one dimension
of the risk to which these actively managed, skill-based strategies are subject. There is a risk of ruin in these strategies, which has historically had a material effect on long-term
performance but which is not reflected in performance volatility. From time to time, extremely low volatility alternative investments have incurred sudden and material losses.
Consequently, any comparison of the e fficient frontiers of traditional and alternative investments is inherently limited. In addition, any comparison of actively managed strategies and
passive securities indexes is itself subject to inherent material limitations, as is the selection of what index should be used as representative of alternative investment strategies.
Tail risk (fat-tail): Defined as scenarios in which an asset or portfolio moves more than three standard deviations from its current price.
Futures: A contract obligating the buyer to buy an asset (or the seller to sell an asset), such as a physical commodity or a financial instrument, at a predetermined future date and
price. Futures contracts are standardized contracts that trade over an exchange.
Kurtosis: A statistical concept that describes the shape, more specifically the peakedness, of a probability distribution.
Max Drawdown: A term used to describe a peak to trough decline during a specific time period.
Monte Carlo Simulations are the result of running a large number of random scenarios in an attempt to determine the most probable performance results of a given portfolio.
These simulations may be based not only on past performance information, which is not indicative of future results, but they may also be based on hypothetical performance for
certain periods and for certain underlying funds or accounts. Monte Carlo simulations do not purport to represent the actual performance of any account, but attempt to indicate
the most repeated hypothetical performance results of a large number of different hypothetical accounts. No actual account has performed in the manner indicated in the Monte
Carlo simulations, and the hypothetical scenarios used in the simulation may omit entire categories of relevant scenarios. There can be no assurance that any given account will
in fact perform in a manner materially consistent with the probabilities indicated by the simulation. No representation is or could be made that the probabilities indicated by
these simulations are based on any fundamental economic or market characteristics, and in the absence of such characteristics, there is no reason that these probabilities will be
representative of any actual account.
Sharpe Ratios and Standard Deviation of returns are commonly used measures of the risk-reward profile of traditional portfolios and broad market indexes. However, these statistics
may materially understate the true risk profile of a fund because hedge funds are subject to a risk of ruin which may not be reflected in the standard deviation of returns. The
markets in which hedge funds trade, the liquidity characteristics of the traded securities, the risks of leverage, the use of derivative securities with nonlinear risk sensitivities, the use
of nonrepresentative historical data for estimating standard deviation, manager error, bad judgment and/or misconduct create the possibility of sudden, dramatic, and unexpected
losses losses that may not be adequately reflected in Sharpe ratios or standard deviations. Prospective investors must recognize this risk of ruin, which is a material risk involved
in investing in any alternative investment, and which may not be adequately reflected in such performance statistics as the Sharpe ratio.
Short: The sale of a borrowed security with the expectation that the security will fall in value and the borrower will be able to purchase the security at a lower price.
Straddle: An options strategy in which the investor holds both a call and a put with the same strike price and expiration date anticipating volatility in the underlying security.
VIX (Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index): An index that measures 30-day expected volatility of the market (S&P 500 Index). The VIX is a commonly used measure of
market risk.
Sussman
July 2012
Kosoff
June 2012
Bowden/ Smith
Spring 2012
Liersch
Spring 2012
Liersch/Suri
Spring 2012
Suri/Almadi/Maclean
14
WHITEPAPER
Spencer Boggess,
Tom Latta,
Anil Suri,
Chris Wolfe,
Jim Russell,
Rick Galiardo,
Bill ONeill,
Victoria Ip,
CIO, EMEA
44-20-79955745
I M P O R TA N T D I S C L 0 S U R E I N F O R M ATI O N
This piece was prepared by the GWM Investment Management & Guidance (IMG). The views expressed are those of IMG. This is not a publication of BoA-Merrill Lynch Global Research.
In addition, these views are subject to change. This material contains forward-looking statements about plans and expectations for the future. These statements may be identified by
the use of words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, estimate, believe, and continue. These statements are based on current plans and expectations. There is always the
risk that actual events may differ materially from those anticipated and that the forward-looking views may not come to pass. This document is current as of the date noted, is solely for
informational purposes and does not purport to address the financial objectives, situation or specific needs of any individual reader. Market information provided herein was generally prepared
by sources unrelated to Merrill Lynch. Such information is believed to be reasonably accurate and current for the purposes of the illustrations provided but neither Merrill Lynch nor any of its
affiliates has independently verified this information. Opinions and estimates expressed herein are as of the date of the report and are subject to change without notice. Neither the information
nor any opinion expressed represents a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security.
Any statements regarding market events, future events or other similar statements constitute only subjective views, are based upon expectations or beliefs, should not be relied on, are subject
to change due to a variety of factors, including fluctuating market conditions, and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, many of which cannot be predicted or
quantified and are beyond Merrill Lynchs control. Future evidence and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying these statements. In light of
these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that these statements are not or will not prove to be accurate or complete in any way.
This document is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities and any such offering will occur only upon
receipt of and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the offering documents. The document is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction
or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
The information contained in this material does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. This document does not take into account your
particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security, financial instrument, or
strategy. Before acting on any recommendation in this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.
Alternative investments are intended for qualified and suitable investors only. Alternative Investments such as derivatives, hedge funds, private equity funds, and funds of funds can
result in higher return potential but also higher loss potential. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances may adversely affect your investments. Before you invest
in alternative investments, you should consider your overall financial situation, how much money you have to invest, your need for liquidity, and your tolerance for risk. Alternative
Investments are speculative and involve a high degree of risk.
This information discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends, or other broad-based economic, market or political conditions and should not be construed as research or
investment advice.
There may be conflicts of interest relating to the alternative investment and its service providers, including Bank of America, and its affiliates, who are engaged in businesses and have
clear interests other than that of managing, distributing and otherwise providing services to the alternative investment. These activities and interests include potential multiple advisory,
transactional and financial and other interests in securities and instruments that may purchase or sell such securities and instruments. These are considerations of which investors in the
alternative investments should be aware. Additional information relating to these conflicts is set forth in the offering materials for the alternative investment.
Investors should bear in mind that the global financial markets are subject to periods of extraordinary disruption and distress. During the financial crisis of 2008-2009, many private
investment funds incurred significant or even total losses, suspended redemptions or otherwise severely restricted investor liquidity, including increasing the notice period required for
redemptions, instituting gates on the percentage of fund interests that could be redeemed in any given period and creating side-pockets and special purpose vehicles to hold illiquid
securities as they are liquidated. Other funds may take similar steps in the future to prevent forced liquidation of their portfolios into a distressed market. In addition, investment funds
implementing alternative investment strategies are subject to the risk of ruin and may become illiquid under a variety of circumstances, irrespective of general market conditions.
Economic and market forecasts presented herein reflect our judgment as of the date of this document and are subject to change without notice. These forecasts do not take into account
the specific investment objectives, restrictions, tax and financial situation or other needs of any specific client. Actual data will vary and may not be reflected here. These forecasts are subject
to high levels of uncertainty that may affect actual performance. Accordingly, based on assumptions, and are subject to significant revision and may change materially as economic and
marketing.
No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii) distributed to any person that is not an employee, officer, director or authorized agent
of the recipient, without Merrill Lynchs prior written consent.
2012 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved.
W H I T E P A P E R
ARS621Q5