LIR 858

Alsadeg 1
Hussain Alsadeg
Labor Relations Practice in Business and Employee Involvement

The Industrial Relations approach to managing the employee/employer

relationship has been losing the battle against the Personnel Management
school practices. Most integral to the recent personnel management approaches
is Employee Involvement. Fifty-two percent of employees in the Workplace
Representation and Participation Survey reported that some form of employee
participation program operates in their workplace and 31 percent indicate
that they participate in an employee involvement program (Commission on the
Future of Worker-Management Relations). Employee Involvement and empowerment
practices are thought to weaken labor unions; as the approach to rewards and
empowerment is distributed to individuals instead of being collectively
bargained. While employee involvement has demonstrated to bring enhanced
productivity and effectiveness, there is concern that employee involvement
programs violate Section 8(a)(2) of the NLRA; this section of the law states:
Sec. 8. [ 158.] (a) [Unfair labor practices by employer] It shall be an
unfair labor practice for an employer--(2) to dominate or interfere with the
formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial
or other support to it: Provided, That subject to rules and regulations made
and published by the Board pursuant to section 6 [section 156 of this title],
an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to confer with
him during working hours without loss of time or pay (National Labor
Relations Act). While employee involvement programs increase productivity and
improve the employees working lives, there is fear that this practice will
replace traditional labor unions with company unions that dominate the
relationship between employees and the employer. The rise of the cooperative
ethic and team-based work structures influenced the rise of employee
involvement. The majority of private organizations today adopt Human Resource

LIR 858

Alsadeg 2

Management approaches to the labor relationship; while collective bargaining

public support has dropped. A 2013 Pew opinion poll revealed that 51% of
Americans have a favorable view of labor unions, an increase from 41% in 2011
(Drake, 2013). The opinion on unions has been tied to their large and
influential power, and economic impact on business.
Labor unions have come a long way since the indictment cases against
collective bargaining and the new deal of 1935. These were days of struggle
for the common working man; days that the Knights of Labor emerged from; days
of large capital banks, heavy investment & wealth, and the social & economic
struggle of the industrial revolution. As masters of capital had a large pool
of migrant workers to utilize in labor-intensive enterprise, traditional
craft producers were facing competition that would force them into
substantial losses and downward mobility. This disparity in economic
conditions and unequal labor voice sparked the labor movement. The aim of the
labor movement was to bring power and equality between capitalists and
workers, as there was great disparity in the distribution of wealth.
Organized labor took many forms, as different organizations and coalitions
were formed around different industries. The establishment of the National
Labor Relations Act of 1935 paved the way for modern labor relations. Labor
union membership was most popular during the period between 1935 until it
peaked at 36% (percentage of workers in Unions) in 1953. The most notable
labor organization today is the American Federation of LaborCongress of
Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), which came in existence after the merger
of AFL and CIO in 1955. Today labor union membership is at 11.3%.
Reasons for this decline in labor unions have been attributed to many
factors. The passage of the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 is attributed by some to
be the principal cause of the decline of the labor movement, as it outlawed
mass picketing, secondary strikes of neutral employers, sit downs; all of

LIR 858

Alsadeg 3

which were core sources of power for unions. Another aspect of the TaftHartley Act is diminished labor movement power, as it changed how unions can
be formed; this slowed the process for labor to organize and eventually
enabled union-busting activities (Noah, 2010).

(U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2013)

Employee Involvement has proven to produce positive results in organizations
which utilize it. Employee involvement is a very important component to
modern Human Resources Management, as the findings for cooperative
relationships between employers and employees establishes increased business
performance. The relationship between employers and unions has traditionally
been adversarial. Organizations that maintain these adversarial relationships

LIR 858

Alsadeg 4

undermine the effects of employee involvement programs. The following is a

list of outcomes from Employee Involvement programs:

(Allen & Norman, 1996)

The list above details many favorable business outcomes to employee
involvement. The research and writings of Edward Lawler have proved the large
beneficial impact of employee involvement. Lawler points to five (5)

LIR 858

Alsadeg 5

performance measures that employee involvement impacts in the following

table:

(Lawler, 1999)
The State of the American Workplace Report of 2013 performed by Gallup
showcases employee involvements impact on several key performance indicators
in the following graph:

(Gallup)
Employee involvement has many definitions across different organizations.
There is current discussion trying to contrast between employee involvement
and employee engagement; while both terms seem synonymous, involvement is

LIR 858

Alsadeg 6

defined as: to have or include (someone or something) as a part of

something (Involvement - Definition), whereas engagement has many meanings
to its definition as: 1- an arrangement to meet or be present at a specified
time and place, 2- a job or period of employment especially as a performer,
3- emotional involvement or commitment, 4- the state of being in gear, 5- a
hostile encounter between military forces (Engagement - definition).
Contrasting between the two the word involvement is clear in its purpose;
whereas the purpose of the word engagement depends on the context it is in,
as such is more ambiguous to understand. Also, employee engagement in
business in commonly used to refer to employee motivation, or the level of
organizational commitment.
As such I would prefer to use the term employee involvement when referring to
the business management approach. Employee involvement is defined as: a wide
variety of practices that move information, knowledge, power, and rewards
downward in organizations (Mohrman, Lawler, & Ledford, 1996). Employee
involvement is employee empowerment or employee voice, other definitions
include: Regular participation of employees in (1) deciding how their work
is done, (2) making suggestions for improvement, (3) goal setting, (4)
planning, and (5) monitoring of their performance (What is employee
involvement), and The direct participation of staff to help an organization
fulfill its mission and meet its objectives by applying their own ideas,
expertise, and efforts towards solving problems and making decisions
(Bullok).
The drivers of employee involvement are the approaches and philosophy
management uphold towards the elements of employee involvement, which are:
-

Power: is the empowerment of employees to make decisions affecting the

organization as a whole. Empowerment occurs on two levels, they are:
strategic decision making and operational decision making. To

LIR 858

Alsadeg 7
accomplish the principles of employee involvement the organization must
empower employees to address both the strategic issues that drive the
organization and the operational tasks and processes they work on. Most
organization only empower employees to resolve operational issues, this
is only a partial method to involvement. When employees are empowered
to address both strategic and operational issues, the organization is
able to reduce the many layers of bureaucracy that slow down decision
making. Also, organizations are able to stand at a competitive
advantage when employees and management cooperatively address problems
and drive solutions.

Information: is a key driver to employee involvement. Organizations

need to provide information on all aspects of the business to all
levels of employees. This open information sharing environment is
needed to successfully implement employee involvement. Many
organizations only share partial non-strategic performance information;
this removes employees from effectively understanding the organization
and from taking part in the strategic decision making process. Also,
while information is available throughout all levels of the
organization, if the culture is not aligned with cooperative
improvement and feedback, the organization will lose on performance
improvements and other benefits.

Rewards: while pushing rewards down the organization are not believed
to increase firm performance, bundling the employee involvement
elements does (Guerrero & Barraud-Didier, 2004). Compensation based on
organizational performance is a best practice and has proven to
increase the success of both employees and the organization.

Knowledge: is having the employee skilled and able to resolve problems

and improve the organization. This is a very critical driver of

LIR 858

Alsadeg 8
employee involvement. Training and development of the organization will
ensure long-term success, as employees are better able to address and
successfully resolve problem issues and drive improvement efforts.

The majority of labor relations contracts revolve around a number specific

terms and conditions. A typical contract will have the following:
-

Scope of work: Defines the work activities the union must deliver on.

Management/Union rights: States the legal rights of management and the

union; generally the terms state the conduct available or required from
each party.

Wages: usually a table or a listing of wages for the different jobs and
shifts available.

Hours of work: states working hours, the start time for working days,
working days, and breaks.

Overtime: states how overtime will be allocated, the overtime

scheduling distribution, and the overtime rate of pay.

Shifts: specifies the number of shifts available, the shift times, pay
during each shift, and how work is allocated for shifts.

Holidays: specifies the holidays, holiday pay, vacations availability,

and personal days

Training: each contract will have different specifics on how training

is administered, some contracts will have very detailed training
requirements, some others will specify an apprenticeship program

Discipline: specifies how the employer and the union handle cases of
work rules violations

Grievance procedure: States how grievances will be handled. Usually

this section will have details on the responsibilities union and
management have on administering grievances.

LIR 858

Alsadeg 9

The relationship between Labor relations and employee involvement is complex.

A common contract has elements that specify the different working conditions.
Examining the differences between the impact of very specific contract
language and less specific contracts shows the flexibility different
organizations have. As contracts that are very specific hinder change and
cause organizations to stagnate during struggles until the collective
bargaining of labor and management agree on new terms and conditions.
Language that is less specific and that details the relationship between the
two parties is more suitable for implementing an employee involvement
practice. Organizations that are not organized with a labor union have a
better opportunity to realize the benefits of employee involvement efforts.
Nevertheless, unions are advised to support employee involvement efforts and
create favorable attitudes among their workforce towards it (Reshef, Kizilos,
Ledford, & Cohen, 1999).
The different stakeholder groups shape the dynamic relationship between the
two practices. The stakeholder groups are:
-

Management: employee involvement requires a different leadership style

than that of traditional organizations. Management is required to
utilize theory Y style of motivation versus theory X

LIR 858

Alsadeg 10
(Dudovskiy, 2013). Also, management need to be well informed and able
to implement the new Human Resources and business concepts that support
an open, friendly, cooperative, and sharing environment. This
stakeholder group is very difficult to change, as the majority have
been accustomed to theory X style of management and drive business in
an authoritarian style. This is evident in organizations that focus on
seniority as the key factor for rewards and upward movement in
organizations. These organizations that lack the leadership required
will struggle behind and face challenges in following business best
practices.

Employees: the organizational strategy and structure need to be aligned

with the principles that drive employee involvement. The principles are
the movement of power, information, knowledge, and rewards downwards in
organizations. Implementing these principles requires an organizational
strategy that operates on differentiation; which is to produce a
competitive advantage by differentiating the product or service and
establishing a unique brand. The other approaches to organizational
strategy are a low-cost strategy and a focused strategy. The
organization should operate with the use of self-managed team in a
decentralized structure with few levels of management. The alignment of
strategy and practice is also very important. Employees need to have
the skills to perform improvement efforts and have the support to
implement improvement suggestions. Employee involvement operates on the
principle that employees are the organizations most valuable asset. As
such, organizations ought to invest in employees and reward employees
on their work. The current best practices in Human Resources management
are Jeffery Pfeffers Seven Human resources practices:
o

Employment Security

LIR 858

Alsadeg 11
o

Selective Hiring

Decentralization of decision making & self managed teams

Compensation contingent on organizational performance

Extensive Training

Reduced status distinctions and barriers

Sharing of financial and performance information throughout

organization

Implementing these practices go hand in hand with employee involvement

practices.
-

Government: the laws that govern business and labor relations determine
the legitimacy of business practices. Laws such as the National Labor
Relations Act sought to strike a balance between wealthy capitalists
and the common worker. Government has a large role in the success of
business, as its laws affect and permeate throughout all organizations.
Government is often seen as a guiding hand, as its departments and
functions provide reports and studies that shape pubic thought.

Community: public opinion is that of the community. When communities

are faced with economic struggle they perceive and act differently than
during economic success. Labor relations seek to balance the disparity
in economic division between the wealthy and the poor. Employee
involvement also seeks to empower employees and provide them with
rewards commensurate with their performance. Communitys role is to
provide support to labor unions and business best practices that aim to
enhance the overall well-being of the community.

A commission on the future of worker-management relations developed a report

that addresses employee involvement within it (Commission on the Future of
Worker-Management Relations). It provides the following recommendations for

LIR 858

Alsadeg 12

Labor relations practice in business and Employee Involvement relevant to

section 8(a)(2) of the NLRA:
1- Facilitate growth of employee involvement: although employee
involvement programs entail the discussion of terms and conditions of
work, these are simply a part of the overall purpose of the program. As
such, employee involvement programs should not be unlawful. This is due
to the fact that the aim of the program is to increase organizational
profitability and performance and not independent representation of
employees.
2- Continue to ban company unions: the commission believes that the law
should continue to prohibit companies from setting up labor
organizations, as it is an unfair labor practice under NLRA.
3- Reduce the scope of supervisory and managerial exclusions: this should
in effect ensure that these positions maintain their ability to
practice their decision-making abilities and be a part of the
collective bargaining process. The two groups are excluded on two core
principles, as they are operating the companys labor relations policy
and are near the top of the managerial structure and have strong
individual power. While these two are to remain excluded, the practice
must lessen its rigid distinctions between employees and those in
supervisory and managerial roles.
4- Authorize pre-hire agreements: companies with upcoming plans should be
allowed to negotiate with unions that are interested in representing
the work of the new plans. The unions shall demonstrate employee
support by the end of the year through card checking or other means.
This aims to improve the labor-management relations.
This section concluded with statements on the importance of employee
involvement programs for the success of the American economy. Also, the

LIR 858

Alsadeg 13

conclusion mentioned impact these recommendations will have on employees and

the application of the law.
While these recommendations tackle the law aspect of the relationship of
employee involvement practice and labor relations, they do not effectively
change the law. It is up to organizations to create the changes themselves.
Labor relations are a fundamentally important part of business. Its current
level of membership and support have been in decline. While the reasons for
the decline are many, there must be reasons for its rise and popularity.
Collective bargaining must partner with modern human resources practices such
as employee involvement for it to succeed and thrive again as a
representative for labor relations.

LIR 858

Alsadeg 14

Works Cited
Allen, R. E., & Norman, K. L. (1996). Employee Involvement Programs: The
Noninvolvement of Unions Revisited. Journal of Labor Research , 479496.
Bullok, R. (n.d.). What is employee involvement. Retrieved 11 5, 2013, from
Scontrino-Powell:
http://www.washington.edu/admin/hr/pod/leaders/orgdev/alliance/articles
/EmployeeInvolvement-ScontrinoPowell.pdf
Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations. (n.d.). II. Employee
Involvement. Retrieved Dec 5, 2013, from United States Department of
Labor: http://www.dol.gov/_sec/media/reports/dunlop/section2.htm
Drake, B. (2013, Sep 2). Opinion of unions is up, membership down. Retrieved
Dec 5, 2013, from Pew Research Center: http://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2013/09/02/opinion-of-unions-is-up-membership-down/
Dudovskiy, J. (2013, March 21). Theory X and Theory Y. Retrieved Dec 5, 2013,
from Research Methodology: http://research-methodology.net/theory-xand-theory-y/
Engagement - definition. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 5, 2013, from Meriam Webster
Online Dictionary: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/engagement
Gallup. (n.d.). State of the american workplace. Retrieved Dec 5, 2013, from
Gallup: http://www.gallup.com/strategicconsulting/163007/stateamerican-workplace.aspx
Guerrero, S., & Barraud-Didier, V. (2004). High-involvement practices and
performance of french firms. International journal of human resources
management , 1408-1423.
Involvement - Definition. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 5, 2013, from Meriam Webster
Online Dictionary: http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/involvement
Lawler, E. E. (1999). Employee involvement makes a difference . The Journal
for Quality and Participation , 18-20.

LIR 858

Alsadeg 15

Mohrman, S. A., Lawler, E. E., & Ledford, G. E. (1996). Do employee

involvement and TQM programs work? The Journal for Quality and
Participation , 6-10.
National Labor Relations Act. (n.d.). Retrieved Dec 5, 2013, from National
Labor Relations Board: http://www.nlrb.gov/resources/national-laborrelations-act
Noah, T. (2010, Sep 12). The United States of Inequality - Why we can't
ignore growing income inequality . Retrieved Dec 5, 2013, from Slate:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_great_divergence/fe
atures/2010/the_united_states_of_inequality/the_great_divergence_and_th
e_death_of_organized_labor.html
Reshef, Y., Kizilos, M., Ledford, G. E., & Cohen, S. G. (1999). Employee
involvement programs: Should unions get involved? Journal of Labor
Research , 557-569.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013, Jan 24). TED: The Editor's Desk.
Retrieved Dec 5, 2013, from Bureau of Labor Statistics:
http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2013/ted_20130124.htm
What is employee involvement. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 5, 2013, from
Businessdictionary.com:
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/employee-involvement.html