Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
226
METHODS
Study Group
The study included a selected group of 40 patients with
surgically proven CP (Tables 1 and 2). CP was defined
preoperatively as a scarred or fused pericardium causing
decreased ventricular and atrial distensibility and rightsided heart failure. The cause of CP was tubercular in 26
patients (65%), pyogenic in 2 (5%), radiation exposure in
2 (5%), and unknown in 10 (25%). The diagnostic evaluation of this group of patients included transthoracic
echocardiography (40 patients), transesophageal echocardiography (3), cardiac catheterization (30), computed
tomography (4), and magnetic resonance imaging (5). All
patients had clinical and echocardiographic evidence of
increased right-sided filling pressures. A dilated inferior
vena cava with spontaneous echocontrast and hepatic
Sengupta et al 227
Characteristic
Age, y, mean SD
Male, No.
IN sinus rhythm, No.
New York Heart Association functional
class, mean SD
Aorta, cm, mean SD
Left atrium, cm, mean SD
Left ventricle (end-diastole), cm, mean
SD
Left ventricle (systole), cm, mean
SD
Interventricular septum (diastole), cm,
mean SD
Posterior wall (diastole), cm, mean
SD
Ejection fraction, %, mean SD
Constrictive
pericarditis
(n 40)
Control
(n 35)
24 12
24
36
2.9 0.7
20 12
23
35
1
2.4 0.5
0.6 0.1
0.7 0.1
0.7 0.1
0.7 0.2
57 9
60 7
Characteristic
Constrictive
pericarditis
(n 40)
10.8
17.0
1.7
9.9
3.0
3.4
0.5
3.8
Control
(n 35)
11.9
15.7
1.7
9.9
1.8
4.6
0.6
1.8
4.6 3.1
8.9 2.6
8.1 3.3
4.6 1.1
5.0 1.0*
3.4 1.4*
7.6 3.0
12.7 4.8
3.2 2.4
7.9 2.3
11.9 4.7
6.9 2.8
Aa, Peak annular late diastolic velocity; Am, peak myocardial late diastolic
velocity; E, peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity; Ea, annular early
diastolic velocity; Em, peak myocardial early diastolic velocity; Sa, peak
annular systolic velocity in ejection; Sm, peak myocardial systolic velocity in
ejection.
*P .001.
P .01.
228 Sengupta et al
Mitral inflow
E, cm/s
A, cm/s
E/A
Pulmonary vein
S, cm/s
D, cm/s
Hepatic vein
SR, cm/s
SR/S
DR, cm/s
DR/D
Percentage
variation
Inspiration
Expiration
65.8 19.7
38.0 12.5
1.8 0.5
77.4 19.3
45.5 17.5
1.8 0.6
15.1 8.9
17.8 9.3
1.3 1.0
37.8 12.9
44.7 13.0
44.5 9.5
54.7 15.4
9.6 8.1
16.8 13.9
20.2
0.6
24.2
0.8
8.9
0.4
10.6
0.2
26.5
0.8
38.2
1.6
10.9
0.3
14.8
0.5
24.3
29.0
33.8
51.2
30.1
16.6
24.8
33.0
RESULTS
In control subjects, septal motion was low velocity;
the highest early diastolic velocity was 6.8 cm/s.
After the isovolumic relaxation wave, a biphasic
early diastolic filling wave occurred (Figure 2). This
was followed by a late diastolic wave. In diastole, the
posterior wall showed a small isovolumic relaxation
wave, followed by an early diastolic and late diastolic wave.
In CP, DTI identified abnormal septal motion in 33
patients (82.5%). A high-velocity polyphasic fluttering of the septum with peak velocity greater than
7 cm/s was seen in 29 patients (72.5%). This included a high-velocity (7 cm/s) early diastolic
biphasic motion that coincided with the early diastolic notching of the septum on M-mode tracing,
followed by multiple recoil waves (reverberations).
High-velocity early diastolic biphasic motion (7
cm/s) without recoil was seen in 4 other patients. In
the posterior wall, the early diastolic wave was
unaltered, whereas the late diastolic wave was reduced in 24 patients (60%) and absent in 7 (17.5%).
Tissue velocity imaging identified abnormalities in
septal or posterior wall motion in CP more frequently than M-mode or 2D echocardiography (33
vs 24 patients, P .003).
DTI also differentiated the pattern of abnormal
septal motion in CP from that in 16 of 20 patients
who had abnormal septal motion (M-mode/2D) of
different causes. Patients with a permanent pacemaker (VVI) had low-velocity septal fluttering (Figure 2, C). Patients with atrial septal defect had
DISCUSSION
CP is characterized by a morphologic abnormality
(thickened, nonpliable pericardium) and a physiologic abnormality (impaired diastolic filling). The
pattern of diastolic dysfunction specific for CP is
best identified by 2D echocardiography and Doppler
echocardiography, and in some cases, invasive hemodynamic recordings are needed.9 The LV chamber shows rapid early diastolic filling and rapid
expansion during early diastole, with a plateau
during the rest of diastole. The interventricular
septum shows two characteristic features: an abrupt
bouncing motion toward the LV during inspiration,
Sengupta et al 229
Figure 2 Comparison of pattern of septal motion in control case (A), VVI pacing (B), atrial septal defect (ASD)
(C), and constrictive pericarditis (CP) (D). Note lowvelocity motion in control cases (A) and VVI pacing (B).
ASD (C) shows paradoxical motion that lacks flutter pattern characteristically seen in CP. Patients with CP may
have paradoxical motion of septum over significant length.
Note, however, that pattern of paradoxical motion in CP
(D) differs from that in ASD by presence of multiple recoil
waves (arrows).
230 Sengupta et al
REFERENCES
1. Morgan JM, Raposo L, Clague JC, Chow WH, Oldershaw PJ.
Restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis: noninvasive distinction by digitized M-mode echocardiography.
Br Heart J 1989;61:29-37.
2. Trappe HJ, Herrmann G, Daniel WG, Frank G, Lichtlen PR.
Reduced diastolic left ventricular posterior wall motion in
patients with constrictive pericarditis: incidence, hemodynamic and clinical correlations. Int J Cardiol 1988;20:53-63.
3. Engel PJ, Fowler NO, Tei CW, Shah PM, Driedger HJ,
Shabetai R, et al. M-mode echocardiography in constrictive
pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:471-4.
4. Candell-Riera J, Garcia del Castillo H, Permanyer-Miralda G,
Soler-Soler J. Echocardiographic features of the interventricular septum in chronic constrictive pericarditis. Circulation
1978;57:1154-8.
5. Sengupta PP, Mohan JC, Pandian NG. Tissue Doppler echocardiography: principles and applications. Indian Heart J
2002;54:368-78.
6. Ha JW, Oh JK, Ommen SR, Ling LH, Tajik AJ. Diagnostic
value of mitral annular velocity for constrictive pericarditis in
the absence of respiratory variation in mitral inflow velocity.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:1468-71.
7. Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L, Ares M, Griffin BP, Thomas JD,
Klein AL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular dia-
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.