Sie sind auf Seite 1von 21

UNIT 40

COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES. DEFINITION AND


TYPOLOGY.
OUTLINE
1. INTRODUCTION.
1.1. Aims of the unit.
1.2. Notes on bibliography.
2. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR COMMUNICATION STRA
2.1. The origins and nature of the communication process.
2.2. Communication and language teaching.
2.3. A theory of communicative competence.
3. COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES: DEFINITION AND TYPOLOGY.
3.1. The concept of strategy.
3.2. Language learning strategies.
3.2.1.

Definition.

3.2.2.

Main factors on the choice of L2 learning strategies.

3.2.3.

Main problems in classifying strategie s.

3.2.4.

Typology.

3.3. Communication strategies.


3.3.1.

Definition.

3.3.2.

Typology.

4. EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING.

5. CONCLUSION.
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY.

1/21

1. INTRODUCTION.
1.1. Aims of the unit.
The main aim of Unit 40 is to define and establish a typology of communication strategies, that is,
the main strategies that come into force in the communication process. Our aim then is to link the
notions of strategies and communication and show their importance in society, and especially, in
the language teaching community within the framework of the Communicative Approach from its
origins to present-day studies. So, we shall divide our presentation in five main chapters.
Chapter 2 will offer a theoretical background for the notions of communication and strategies
and in order to do so, we shall trace back to (1) the origins of the communication process and (2) its
relationship with language teaching, which will establish a basis for (3) a theory of communicative
competence. It is at this point that we shall introduce the concept of communicative strategies since
they are included in the concept of language learning strategies as part of the notion of
communicative competence in foreign language learning and teaching.
With this background in mind, Chapter 3 is divided into three main sections so as to analyse first,
the concept of strategy, then the concept of language learning strategies and finally, the concept
of communication strategies in terms of definition and typology. So, this section provides (1) a
definit ion of the term strategy in terms of origins within a language learning background; (2) an
approach to language learning strategies in terms of (a) definition, by means of which we shall
review (i) the main factors influencing the choice of L2 learning strategies; and (ii) the main
problems in classifying strategies and (b) typology, based on the contributions of the most relevant
researchers in the field. Next, it is at this point that we shall meet (3) the concept of communication
strategies and we shall examine it in terms of (a) definition and (b) a typology, following again the
main figures in this field.
Chapter 4 will be devoted to present the main educational implications in language teaching
regarding communicative strategies, and Chapter 5 will offer a conclusion to broadly overview our
present study. Finally, Chapter 6 will include all the bibliographical references used to develop this
account of communicative strategies.

2/21

1.2. Notes on bibliography.


An influential introduction to the notion of communication is based on relevant works of Crystal,
Linguistics (1985) and Halliday, Explorations in the Functions of Language (1975). Moreover,
notes on the relationship between communication and language teaching are namely taken from
Howatt, A history of English Language teaching (1984); Widdowson, Teaching Language as
Communication (1978); and Larsen-Freeman & Long, An introduction to second language
acquisition research (1991). Comments on a theory of communicative competence so as to introduce
communicative strategies are namely drawn from Ellis, Understanding Second Language Acquisition
(1985); Richards, J., & Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (1992): and
Hymes, On communicative competence (1972).
Classic works on communicative strategies definition and typology, include Lessard-Clouston,
Michael, Language Learning Strategies: An Overview for L2 Teachers (1997); Hismanoglu,
Language Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching (2000); Faerch &
Kasper, Strategies in Interlanguage Communication (1983); Fedderholdt, Using Diaries to Develop
Language Learning Strategies (1997); Murphy, On Teaching Communicative Strategies in the
Classroom (2003); OMalley & Chamot , Learning strategies in second language acquisition
(1990); Oxford, Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know (1990); Wenden
& Rubin, Learner Strategies in Language Learning (1987); and still indispensable on this issue,
Tarone, Conscious Communication Strategies in Interlanguage: a Progress Report (1977) and
Tarone, Some thoughts on the notion of communication strategy (1983).

The background for educational implications is based on the theory of communicative competence
and communicative approaches to language teaching are provided by Canale, From Communicative
Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy (1983); Canale and Swain, Theoretical bases
of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing (1980); Hymes, On
communicative competence (1972); Hedge Tricia, Teaching and Learning in the Language
Classroom (2000); Bachman, Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing (1990); Krashen,
Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning (1981); Krashen & Terrell, The
Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom (1983); Richards & Platt, Longman

3/21

Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (1992); and Stern, Issues and Options in
Language Teaching (1992).
In addition, the most complete record of current publications within the educational framework is
provided by the guidelines in B.O.E. (2002); the Council of Europe, Modern Languages: Learning,
Teaching, Assessment. A Common European Framework of reference (1998); Hedge Tricia,
Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom (2000); and Stern, Issues and Options in
Language Teaching (1992). Moreover, we can find more information on The Internet TESL
Journal, Vol. VI, No. 8, August 2000.

2. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES.

Chapter 2 will offer a theoretical background for the notions of communication and strategies
and in order to do so, we shall trace back to (1) the origins of the communication process and (2) its
relationship with language teaching, which will establish a basis for (3) a theory of communicative
competence. It is at this point that we shall introduce the concept of communicative strategies since
they are included in the concept of language learning strategies as are part of the notion of
communicative competence in foreign language learning and teaching.

2.1. The origins and nature of the communication process.

From an anthropological perspective, the origins of communication are to be found in the very early
stages of life when there was a need for animals and humans to communicate basic structures of the
world and everyday life. Before language was developed, non-verbal codes were used by humans to
convey information by means of symbols, body gestures, and sounds, as it is represented in pictorial
art and burial sites. However, since prehistoric times the way of improving communication
preoccupied human beings as they had a need to express their thoughts with words. This non-verbal
code was to be developed into a highly elaborated signaling system, both spoken and written, which
became an essential tool of communication for human beings (Crystal, 1985).

4/21

Historically speaking, various attempts have been made to conceptualize the nature of
communication and to explore its relationship to human language regarding types, elements and
purposes. For several millennia many linguists and philosophers have approached the concept of
language from different domains of knowledge, such as philosophy, psychology, anthropology, and
sociology among others, in order to offer an account of the prominent features of human language
in opposition to other systems of communication.
According to Halliday (1975), language may be defined as an instrument of social interaction with a
clear communicative purpose. Among the most prominent design features of human language, an
auditory-vocal channel is to be highlighted in opposition to tactile, visual or other means of
communication. This feature allows human beings to be able to reproduce and produce an infinite
number of messages in any context of space and time thanks to the arbitrariness of language (to
combine sounds with no intrinsic meaning so as to form elements with meaning). Moreover, due to
a traditional transmission, language is transmitted from one generation to the next by a process of
teaching and learning. This feature is the aim of our next section which links communication and
language teaching in order to provide a meaningful framework to the notion of communicative
competence.

2.2. Communication and language teaching.

From a historical perspective, Howatt (1984) has demonstrated that many current issues in language
teaching are not particularly new. For instance, in the seventeenth century, the theologian Jan Amos
Komensky (1592-1670), Comenius, who was said to be the founder of didactics (the art of
teaching), already stated the reasons for learning a foreign language. He claims that through
language, we come to a closer understanding of the world since language refers to things in the
world . Upon this basis, he claims that for men to retrieve something of their old collective
wisdom, it is necessary for them to learn each others languages.
In the words of Widdowson (1978), these opportunities Comenius mentions to communicate with
others, have to do with the ability to communicate in a foreign language and the ability to interpret
and produce meaning. This is an important goal for language learners, especially for those who
need to fulfill roles as family members, community members, students, teachers, employers or
employees in an foreign language speaking environment. While there are many influential factors in

5/21

second language learning, as the learner characteristics such as age, personality, and intelligence,
the critical dimension in language learning is interaction with other speakers.
Similarly, in the words of Larsen-Freeman (1991), one learns to do by doing, since people learn to
walk by walking and they learn to drive by driving. Therefore, it makes sense, then, that people
learn to communicate by communicating, and similarly, those learners who engage in the regular
use of their second language and receive the greater quantity of input will most likely demonstrate a
greater ability to use their second language. Learners must actively work and practice extensively
on communicating to develop skills in communication.
It follows, then, that learners should be provided with as much speaking time as possible, both in
and out of the classroom. However, we should not forget that communicating successfully implies
not only a correct use of structure and form, but also to communicate intelligibly and appropriately
for students to achieve a successful interaction. This ability to communicate is the aim of our next
section where we will provide an approach to the notion of communicative competence within the
framework of language teaching.

2.3. A theory of communicative competence.

In this section, it is relevant to conceptualize first some key issues related to the concept of
communicative competence in order to fully understand the term and its relevance in foreign
langua ge teaching. Therefore, the concepts of proficiency, competence and performance will
be under revision as follows.
Within a language teaching theory, many approaches and theories stem from a fundamental
question which addresses the way of help ing students who are learning a second language in a
classroom setting, become proficient in that language. Another question arises, then, in relation to
what it means to be proficient in a language, and to what a learner has to know in terms of
grammar, vocabulary, sociolinguistic appropriateness, conventions of discourse, and cultural
understanding in order to use a language well enough for real world purpose.
Following Ellis (1985), we may define proficiency as the learners knowledge of the target language
viewed as linguistic competence or communicative competence. Common synonyms for the term
are expertise, ability, or competence within implications at a high level of skill, well-developed

6/21

knowledge, and polished performance. As we have seen, the term proficiency brings about the
notions of competence and performance which must be also reviewed.
These two notions of competence and performance are one of the main tenets in Chomskys theory
of transformational grammar (Richards & Rodgers, 2001). This distinc tion addresses competence as
the idealized native speakers underlying competence, referring to ones implicit or explicit
knowledge of the system of the language whereas performance addresses to an individual
performance, referring to ones actual production and comprehension of language in specific
instances of language use.
This fundamental distinction has been at the centre of discussions of many other researchers, and in
fact, it has been reviewed and evaluated since then from various theoretical perspectives. However,
in his work On communicative competence (1972), the American anthropologist Dell Hymes felt
that there are rules of language use that are neglected in Chomskys approach, as native speakers
know more than just grammatical competence. Hymes, with a tradition on sociolinguistics, had a
broader view of the term which included not only grammatical competence, but also sociolinguistic
and contextual competence.
For Hymes, the notion of communicative competence is the underlying knowledge a speaker has of
the rules of grammar including phonology, orthography, syntax, lexicon, and semantics, and the
rules for their use in socially appropriate circumstances. Therefore, we understand competence as
the knowledge of rules of grammar, and performance, they way the rules are used.
The verbal part of communicative competence comprises all the so-called four skills: listening,
reading, speaking and writing. It is important to highlight this, since there is a very common
misunderstanding that communicative competence only refers to the ability to speak. It is both
productive and receptive. All of us have developed communicative competence in our native
language, oral proficiency and later, possibly, written proficiency, since the acquisition of
communicative competence in a foreign or second language takes place on the basis of the fact that
we already have a native language. So we are dealing with the development of two systems that
interact.
The question of how learners process new information and what kind of strategies they employ to
understand, learn or remember the information has be en the primary concern in research for over
the last twenty years, with greater emphasis being put on learners and learning rather than on
teachers and teaching. Research has repeatedly shown that the conscious, tailored use of such
strategies is related to language achievement and proficiency. These strategies are called language

7/21

learning strategies whose typology will shed light on the concept of communication strategies,
since it is one of the three main types of language learning strategies.
3. COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES: DEFINITION AND TYPOLOGY.
With this background in mind, Chapter 3 aims at emphasizing the relevance of language learning
strategies in foreign language learning and teaching and, in particular, of communication strategies.
Then this section is divided into three sections so as to analyse first, the concept of strategy, then
the concept of language learning strategies and finally, the concept of communication strategies
in terms of definition and typology.
So, this section provides (1) a definition of the term strategy in terms of origins within a language
learning background; (2) an approach to language learning strategies in terms of (a) definition, by
means of which we shall review (i) the main factors influencing the choice of L2 learning strategies;
and (ii) the main problems in classifying strategies and (b) typology, based on the contributions of
the most relevant researchers in the field. Next, it is at this point that we shall meet (3) the concept
of communication strategies and we shall examine it in terms of (a) definition and (b) a typology,
following again the main figures in this field.

3.1. The concept of strategy.


As stated above, the interest, and therefore research, into the concept of strategies began in the
1960s when developments in cognitive pshychology stressed the importance of communication
strategies for foreign language learning and the teachers role in strategy training. The primary
concern was on identifying what good language learners report they do to learn a second or foreign
language, or, in some cases, are observed doing while learning a second or foreign language
(Rubin & Wenden, 1987:19).
In his study The Method of Inference in Foreign Language Study (1966), Aaron Carton made the
first attempt on learner strategies. After Carton, in 1971, other linguists such as Rubin (1975) started
doing research focussing on the strategies of successful learners and stated that, once identified,
such strategies could be made available to less successful learners. Rubin (1975) classified
strategies in terms of processes contributing directly or indirectly to language learning. Yet, how do
we define the concept of strategies?

8/21

Actually, the description of the term strategies must be linked to that of the communicative
approach and language learning strategies in the classroom setting. Communicative Language
Teaching theory holds that negotiating meaning is a key element in learning a foreign language and
hence, the ability to negotiate meaning is dependent upon ones ability to use communicative
strategies effectively.
In fact learning strategies are defined as specific actions, behaviors, steps, or techniques students
use, often consciously, to improve their progress in apprehending, internalizing, and using the
foreign or second language (L2). They may refer to conversation patterns, the use of gestures to
communicate when the words do not come to mind, the learning of words by breaking them down
into their components, using guesses when reading, and so on. So, strategies prove essential as the
tools for active, self-directed involvement needed for developing L2 communicative ability
(OMalley & Chamot, 1990). Here we are some other definitions of the term.

3.2. Language learning strategies.


3.2.1. Definition.

The term language learning strategy has been also defined as any sets of operations, steps, plans,
routines used by the learner to facilitate the obtaining sotrage, retrieval, and use of information
(Wenden & Rubin, 1987:19); intentional behavior and thoughts used by learners during learning so
as to better help them understand, learn, or remember new information (Richards & Platt,
1992:209); and a lso as an attempt to develop linguistic and sociolinguistic competence in the target
language (Faerch & Kasper, 1983:67).
According to Stern (1992:261), the concept of learning strategy is dependent on the assumption
that learners consciously engage in activities to achieve certain goals and learning strategies can be
regarded as broadly conceived intentional directions and learning techniques. Moreover, according
to Hismanoglu (2000), a ll language learners use language learning strategies either consciously or
unconsciously when processing new information and performing tasks in the language classroom.

9/21

3.2.2. Main factors on the choice of L2 learning strategies.


According to Oxford (1990), the choice of strategies used among students learning a second
language is influenced by several factors, such as motivation, gender, cultural background, attitudes
and beliefs, type of task, age and stage, learning style and finally, tolerance of ambiguity.

Regarding motivation, those students who are more motivated tend to use more strategies
than less motivated students. Also, the particular reason for studying, such as the
motivational orientation related to career field, is important in the choice of strategies.

Regarding gender, females are reported to use greater overall strategies than males in many
studies although sometimes surpassed females in the use of a particular strategy.

Regarding cultural background, certain cultures use special forms of memorization which
seem to be more prevalent among other cultures.

Attitudes and beliefs are reported to have a profound effect on the strategies learners
choose, with negative attitudes and beliefs often causing poor strategy use of lack of
strategies.

Regarding the type of task , their nature help determine the strategies naturally employed to
carry out the task.

With respect to age and stage , students of different ages and stages of L2 learning are said
to use different strategies, with some of them often being employed by older or more
advanced students.

Concerning the learning style , that is, the general approach to language learning, it often
determines the choice of L2 learning strategies. For instance, analytic -style students prefer
strategies such as contrastive analysis, rule-learning, and separating words and phrases,
while global students tend to use strategies to find meaning (guessing, scanning, predicting)
and to converse without knowing all the words (paraphrasing, gesturing).

Finally, regarding tolerance of ambiguity, students who are more tolerant are said to use
significantly different learning strategies in some instances than did students who are less
tolerant.

3.2.3. Main problems in classifying strategies.

10/ 21

Before offering a typology of language learning strategies, it is crucial to take into account the main
problems in classifying strategies since there are a wide range of typologies, almost two dozens
strategy classification systems. The existence of these distinct strategy typologies indicates a major
problem in the research area and therefore, a lack of a coherent, well accepted system for describing
these strategies. So, these systems have been divided into five main groups depending the variables
they are related to:
(1) successful language learners (Rubin, 1975);
(2) psychological functions (OMalley & Chamot, 1990);
(3) linguistically based systems dealing with guessing, language monitoring, formal and
functional practice or with communication strategies like paraphrasing or borrowing
(Tarone, 1983);
(4) separate language skills (Cohen, 1990);
(5) and finally, different styles or types of learners (Ellis, 198 5).

3.2.4. Typology.
Since language classroom is like a problem-solving environment in which language learners are
likely to face new input and difficult tasks given by their instructors, learners attempts to find que
quickest or easiest way to do what is required, that is, using language learning strategies is
inescapable. Language learning strategies language learners use during the act of processing the
new information and performing tasks have been identified and described by researchers, but still,
there is no generally agreed typology to follow.

The classification of Language Learning Strategies goes back to the figure of Selinker, who coined
the term communication strategy in 1972 in his account of the processes responsible for
interlanguage. Shortly after, in 1975 and later on in 1987, Joan Rubin classified the strategies of
language learning into direct and indirect (the former contribute directly to learning whereas the
latter contribute indirectly to the learning process).
Of course, this classification is not the only one and others followed. Thus, OMalley (1985)
divided learning strategies into three main categories: metacognitive, cognitive and socioaffective;
Oxford (1990) distinguished two main classes, direct and indirect, which were subdivided into six

11/ 21

groups: direct (memory, cognitive, compensation strategies) and indirect (metacognitive, affective
and social strategies); Stern (1992) also introduced his own classification (management and
planning, cognitive, communicative, interpersonal and affective strategies) but in the end, they all
reflect the same categorization of language learning strategies.

In fact, most of the attempts to classify language learning strategies reflect more or less the same
categorizations of language learning strategies without any radical changes. In what follows, we
shall shortly summarize how various researchers have categorized language learning strategies, thus
Rubin (1987), Oxford (1990), OMalley (1985) and Stern (1992). So, for our purposes, we shall
establish Rubins classification since he pionered much of the work in this field and also makes
direct reference to the concept of communication strategies.
Then, according to him (1987), there are three main types of strategies used by learners that
contribute directly or indirectly to language learning: learning strategies, social strategies and
communication strategies.
(1) Regarding learning strategies, there are two main types: cognitive le arning strategies and
metacognitive learning strategies.

The former refer to the the steps or operations used in learning or problem-solving that
require direct analysis, transformation, or synthesis of learning materials. Rubin
identified six main cognitive learning strategies contributing directly to language
learning (clarification, guessing, deductive reasoning, practice, memorization and
monitoring).

The latter are used to oversee, regulate or self-direct language learning and involve
various processes as planning, prioritising, setting goals, and self-management.

(2) Social strategies are those activities learners engage in which afford them opportunities to
be exposed to and practise their knowledge. Although this kind of strategies provide
exposure to the target language, they contribute indirectly to learning since they do no lead
directly to the obtaining storing, retrieving, and using of language (Rubin & Wenden,
1987: 23-27).

12/ 21

(3) Finally, communication strategies are less directly related to language learning sin ce they
focus on the process of participating in a conversation and getting meaning across what the
speaker intends to say. Communication strategies are used by speakers when faced with
some difficulty due to the fact that their communication ends outrun, their communication
means or when confronted with misunderstanding by a co-speaker (Rubin & Wenden,
1987). But how do other relevant figures define and classify communication strategies?

3.3. Communication strategie s.

3.3.1. Definition.
As seen, communication strategies have been defined as strategies employed when people
encounter a communication problem during conversation (Murphy, 2003). In addition, according
to Ellis (1985:164), communicative strategies are related to the cognitive component of procedural
knowledge, which comprises the various mental processes involved in internalizing and
automatizing new L2 knowledge (second language learning) and in using this knowledge in
conjunction with other knowledge sources to communicate in the L2. Communication strategies,
then, are the result of an initial failure to implement a production plan. Language use, therefore, is
characterized by both production and reception strategies, which operate when the learner utilizes
available resources easily and subconsciously (Ellis, 1985).
A mention to language learning strategies in our educational curricula is to be found within the
framework of the communicative approach to language teaching. So, since communication
strategies are components of communicative competence, it is necessary to define what
communicative competence is. The most well-known definition is Canale and Swains (1980) and
later Canales (1983) definition. According to these scholars, four different components make up
communicative competence: grammatical, discourse, sociolinguistic and strategic competence.

1. Grammatical competence.
Grammatical competence subsumes all knowledge of lexical items and of rules of
morphology, syntax, sentence-grammar semantics and phonology (Canale and

13/ 21

Swain,1980). It therefore refers to having control over the purely linguistic aspects of
the language code itself, regarding verbal and non-verbal codes. This corresponds to
Hymes grammatical aspect and includes knowledge of the lexicon, syntax,
morphology, phonology and semantics. Thus, it involves rules of formulations and
constraints for students to match sound and meaning; to form words and sentences
using vocabulary; to use language through spelling and pronunciation; and to handle
linguistic semantics.
2. Discourse competence.
For our purposes, discourse analysis is primarily concerned with the ways in which
individual sentences connect together to form a communicative message. One of its
main figures, Widdowson (1978) proposed a distinction between the concepts of use
and usage, where usage refers to the manifestation of the knowledge of a language
system and use means the realization of the language system as meaningful
communicative behavior. This competence addresses directly to the mastery of how to
combine grammatical forms and meanings to achieve a unified spoken or written text in
different genres (Canale and Swain 1980). By genre is meant the type of text to be
unified, thus, a scientific paper, an argumentative essay, and oral and written narrative
among others. For them, the unity of a text is achieved through cohesion in form and
coherence in meaning.
3. Sociolinguistic competence.
Sociolinguistic competence refers to the knowledge which the learner has to acquire of
the sociocultural rules of language. This type of knowledge requires an understanding
of the social context in which language is used: the roles of the participants, the
information they share, and the function of the interaction (Savignon 1983). Other
relevant figures in this field, such as Canale and Swain (1980) defined this competence
in terms of sociocultural rules of use, and rules of discourse. Regarding the rules of
discourse, it is defined in terms of the mastery of how to combine grammatical forms
and meanings (1980). When we deal with appropriateness of form, we refer to the
extent to which a given meaning is represented in both verbal and non-verbal form that
is proper in a given sociolinguistic context.
4. Strategic competence.

14/ 21

Finally we come to the fourth area of Communicative Competence. In the words of


Canale (1983), strategic competence is the verbal and nonverbal communication
strategies that may be called into action to compensate for breakdowns in
communication due to performance variables or due to insuffic ient competence.This is
quite a complex area but in a simplified way we can describe it as the type of
knowledge which we need to sustain communication with someone. This may be
achieved by paraphrase, circumlocution, repetition, hesistation, avoidance, guessing as
well as shifts in register and style. According to Canale and Swain (1980), strategic
competence is useful in various circumstances as for instance, the early stages of
second language learning where communicative competence can be present with uj st
strategic and socio-linguistic competence.

As we can see, the first two components reflect the use of the linguistic system whereas the last two
define the functional aspects of communication. Focusing on communication strategies, and
therefore, the strategic competence, this is seen as the capacity that relates language competence,
or knowledge of language, to the language users knowledge structures and the features of context
in which communication takes place. Strategic competence performs assessment, planning, and
execution functions in determining the most effective means of achieving a communicative goal
(Bachman, 1990).
So, as speakers compensate for breakdowns in communication using strategic competence, we shall
offer a typology of these communication strategies following that of Tarone (1977) and later on,
Tarone (1983).

3.3.2. Typology.
We may establish a common typology half-way between the contributions of Tarone (1983) and
Celce-Murcia et al. (1995:28). So the classification of communication strategies would be done into
five main subtypes: (1) achievement or compensatory strategies, (2) stalling or time-gaining
strategies, (3) avoidance, (4) self -monitoring strategies, and (5) interactional strategies. Thus:
1. Achivement or compensatory strategies, paraphrasing according to Tarone (1983), are
subdivided into

15/ 21

Approximation, as the use of a single target language vocabulary item or structure,


which the learners knows is not correct, but which shares enough semantic features
in common with the desired item to satisfy the speaker (i.e. scarf for a piece of
clothing you wear around your neck in winter, fish for carp).

Circumlocution, where the learner describes the characteristics or elemtns of the


objects or action instead of using the appropriate target language item or structure
(i.e. She is smoking something. I dont know what its name is).

Word coinage, where the learner makes up a new word in order to communicate a
desired concept (i.e. airball for balloon, vegetarianist).

Literal translation, by means of which the learner translates word for word from the
native language (i.e. I have eight years old).

Language switch, by means of which the learner uses the native language term
without bothering to translate (i.e. He sent the ball from the corner in the last
minute).

Appeal for assistance, by means of which the learnerasks for the correct form (i.e.
The bus was very ... -What is it? What called?).

Finally, mime, by means of which the learner uses non-verbal strategies in place of
a lexical item or action (i.e. frowning = angry).

2. Avoidance is subdivided into

Topic avoidance, in which the learner simply tries not to talk about concepts for
which the target language item or structure is not known.

Message abandonment, in which the learner begins to talk about a concept but is
unable to continue and stops in mid-utterance.

3. Time-gaining strategies are subdivided into

Fillers, hesitation devices and gambits (i.e. Well, actually, er, where was I?)

Self and other-repetition.

4. Self -monitoring strategies:

16/ 21

Self-initiated repair (i.e. Well, I mean...; that is, ...; that is to say...).

Self-rephrasing with over-elaboration (i.e. This is for students and pupils when you
are free at school).

5. Interactional strategies, which are subdivided into

Appeal for help, which can be direct (i.e. What do you call this?) or indirect (i.e. I
dont know the word in English).

Meaning negotiation strategies.

Indicators of misunderstanding requests, indicating repetition (i.e. Pardon? Or


Could you say that again, please?), clarification (i.e. What do you mean by...?),
confirmation (i.e. Did you say...?).

Expressions of non-understanding, such as verbal ones (i.e. Sorry, Im not sure I


understand) or non-verbal (i.e. raised eyebrows, blank look).

Interpretive summary (i.e. You mean this? / So what you are saying is this?).

Reponses (i.e. repetition, rephrasing, expansion, reduction, confirmation, rejection,


repair).

Comprehension check whether the interlocutor can follow you (i.e. Am I making
sense?), what you said was correct or grammatical (i.e. I said that?), the interlocutor
is listening (i.e. on the phone: Are you still there?) or whether the interlocutor can
hear you (i.e. Are you listening to me?/Can you hear me?).

4. EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING.


According to Hismanoglu (2000), since the amount of information to be processed by language
learners is high in language classroom, learners use different language learning strategies in
performing the tasks and processing the new input they face. Language learning strategies are good
indicators of how learners approach tasks or problems encountered during the process of language
learning. In other words, language learning strategies, while nonobservable or unconsciously used
in some cases, give language teachers valuable clues about how their students assess the situation,

17/ 21

plan, select appropriate skills so as to understand, learn, or remember new input presented in the
language classroom.
In addition, according to Fedderholdt (1997), the language learner capable of using a wide variety
of language learning strategies appropriately can improve his language skills in a better way.
Metacognitive strategies improve organization of learning time, self -monitoring, and selfevaluation. Cognitive strategies include using previous knowledge to help solve new problems.
Socioaffective strategies include asking native speakers to correct their pronunciation, or asking a
classmate to work together on a particular language problem. So, as we can see, developing skills
in these three areas, such as metacognitive, cognitive, and socioaffective can help the language
learner build up learner independence and autonomy whereby he can take control of his own
learning.
It is a fact that language learning strategie s contribute to the development of the communicative
competence of the students. In this study, we have seen how, being a broad concept, language
learning strategies are used to refer to all strategies foreign language learners use in learning the
target language and communication strategies are one type of language learning strategies. It
follows from this that language teachers aiming at developing the communicative competence of
the students and language learning should be familiar with language learning strategies. As Oxford
(1990) states, language learning strategies are especially important for language learning because
they are tools for active, self-directed movement, which is essential for developing communicative
competence.
Besides, adds Himanoglu (2000), developing the communicative competence of the students,
teachers who train students to use language learning strategies can help them become better
language learners. Helping students understand good language learning strategies and training them
to develop and use such good language learning strategies can be considered to be the appreciated
characteris tics of a good language teacher.
Research into the good language learning strategies revealed a number of positive strategies so that
such strategies could also be used by bad language learners trying to become more successful in
language learning. However, there is always the possibility that bad language learners can also use
the same good language learning strategies while becoming unsuccessful owing to some other
reasons. At this point, it should be strongly stressed that using the same good language learning

18/ 21

strategies does not guarantee that bad learners will also become successful in language learning
since other factors may also play role in success (Hismanoglu, 2000).

5. CONCLUSION.
As Hismanoglu (2000), claims language learning strategies, being specific actions, behaviors,
tactics, or techniques, facilitate the learning of the target language by the language learner. All
language learners, needless to say, use language learning strategies in the learning process. Since
the factors like age, gender, personality, motivation, self-concept, life-experience, learning style,
excitement, and anxiety, among others, affect the way in which language learners learn the target
language, it is not reasonable to support the idea that all language learners use the same good
language learning strategies or should be trained in using and developing the same strategies to
become successful learners.
As Lessard-Clouston (1997) mentions, studies to be done on language learning strategies and
strategy training should move beyond descriptive taxonomies of language learning strategies and
attempt to seek for answers to a wide range of questions, such as: What types of language learning
strategies appear to work best with what learners in which contexts? Does language learning
strategies or language learning strategies training transfer easily between L2 and FL contexts? What
is the role of language proficiency in language learning strategies use and training? How long does
it take to train specific learners in certain language learning strategies? How can one best assess and
measure success in language learning strategies use or training? Are certa in language learning
strategies learned more easily in classroom and non-classroom contexts? What language learning
strategies should be taught at different proficiency levels?
It can be expected that answers to the above mentioned and many other questions from research in a
variety of settings will pave the way for building the theory that seems necessary for more language
learning strategies work to be relevant to current L2 / FL teaching practice.

19/ 21

6. BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Bachman, L.F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
B.O.E. 2002. Consejera de Educacin y Cultura. Decreto N. 112/2002, de 13 de septiembre. Currculo de la Educacin
Secundaria Obligatoria en la Comunidad Autnoma de la Regin de Murcia.
B.O.E. 2002. Consejera de Educacin y Cultura. Decreto N. 113/2002, de 13 de septiembre. Currculo de Bachillerato en
la Comunidad Autnoma de la Regin de Murcia.
Brown, G. and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Canale, M., and M. Swain, 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and
testing. Applied Linguistics 1 (1).
Canale, M. 1983. From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy, in J. Richards and R.
Schmidt (eds.). Language and Communication. London, Longman.Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence. In J.
B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics, pp. 269-93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Council of Europe (1998) Modern Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. A Common European Framework of
reference.
Crystal, D. 1985. Linguistics. Harmondsworth, England. Penguin Books.
Ellis, R. 1985. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Faerch, C. and G. Kasper.1983. Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman.
Fedderholdt, Karen. 1997. Using Diaries to Develop Language Learning Strategies. On The Internet TESL Journal,
Vol. VI, No. 8, August 2000.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1975. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A. K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Longman.
Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom (OUP).
Hismanoglu, M. 2000. Language Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Hacettepe University,
Turkey.
Howatt, A. 1984. A history of English Language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Krashen, S. D. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. D., and T. D., Terrell. 1983. The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford:
Pergamon.
Larsen-Freeman, D. and M.H. Long. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York:
Longman.

Lessard-Clouston, Michael. 1997. Language Learning Strategies: An Overview for L2 Teachers on The Internet TESL
Journal, 2000.
Murphy, R. 2003. On Teaching Communicative Strategies in the Classroom. Paper for the Association for Language
Teaching. Matsuyama JALT Chapter.

OMalley, J.M., and A.U. Chamot. 1990. Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

20/ 21

Oxford, R. 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House
Publishers.
Richards, J. and J. Platt. 1992. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Essex: Longman.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. 1992. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Stern, H.H. 1992. Issues and Options in Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Tarone, E. 1977. Conscious Communication Strategies in Interlanguage: a Progress Report in H.D. Brown, A. Yorio,
and R.C. Crymes (eds.). in TESOL 77, Teaching and Learning ESL. Washington D.C.: TESOL, 194-203.
Tarone, E. 1983. Some thoughts on the notion of communication strategy in C. Faerch, and G. Kasper (eds.). Strategies
in Interlanguage Communication. New York: Longman.
Wenden, A. and J. Rubin.1987. Learner Strategies in Language Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Widdowson, H. G. 1978. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21/ 21

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen