Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Centro de Tecnologia da Mobilidade, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Presidente Antnio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Numidis S.a.r.l., France
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 March 2015
Accepted 14 August 2015
Available online 1 September 2015
Keywords:
Down-sizing
Ethanol direct injection
Turbocharged
Down-speeding
Exhaust Gas Recirculation
a b s t r a c t
The paper presents a layout of a highly boosted Ethanol Direct Injected engine in order to explore the
limits of down-sizing for replacing high-displacement gasoline engines, which represents a powerful
means of reducing fuel consumption and engine-out emissions at reduced production costs. The
substitution of high-displacement engines (2.4- or 3.0-l) by a down-sized turbocharged Ethanol Direct
Injected engine is studied. This document describes the detailed layout of all engine hardware and in
particular, the cylinder head structure including the optimized intake and exhaust manifolds as well
as implemented direct injection injectors. The work continues with a presentation of the experimental
data obtained at the engine test rig. A series of experimental data is also presented for the down-sized
engine mounted in a car as a replacement for its original high-displacement engine. Substantial fuel
consumption gains are obtained as well as values of engine torque for the down-sized, down-speeded
prototype engine, which makes it possible to replace engines with much higher displacements. As a result
the maximum obtained efficiency of the 1.4 l prototype engine with twin-stage compressor reaches a
value of 3250 kPa brake pressure at 44% efficiency. The present work is a very new and different approach
compared to previous published studies on ethanol and down-sized engines due to the fact that the
Brazilian hydrated ethanol fuel (7% water content) has a major charge effect compared to North
American and European Gasoline and alcohol fuels (consult Table 1). This means that more aggressive
down-sizing, turbo-charging and mixture stratification approaches can be applied as the following
chapters will explain in detail.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The approach of combining highly boosted Ethanol Direct
Injected (EDI) engines with extreme down-sizing represents a
powerful means of reducing CO2 emissions as well as reducing
engine production costs. It makes it possible to replace highdisplacement gasoline (E0) or flex fuel (E22) engines with smaller
highly boosted engines running on bio-fuels such as hydrated ethanol in Brazil (E100) or in North America and Europe (E85). The
denomination Ex, where x can be a random number between 0
and 100 is currently used in the automotive terminology to indicate the fraction of ethanol blended into pure gasoline. Why use
alcohol fuels? The oxidation within the combustion chamber of
both a carbon and an alcohol-based fuel produces inevitably,
amongst other pollutants, CO2 in quantities proportional to the
Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 31 8642 3698.
E-mail address: baeta@demec.ufmg.br (J.G.C. Bata).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.041
0196-8904/ 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
859
Nomenclature
EDI
EXX
PFI
CO2
HC
NOX
CR
EGR
EPA
CFD
NCM
NS
ALE
SG
Trz
Ca
y
v
i
CA
VVT
ECU
FTP
NVH
SMD
PN
COP
DI
NA
RON
VEM
GDI
HCCI
Try
Dcylinder
x
u
w
n
TDC
k
IMEP
BMEP
L/D ratio
D10
ORNL
UFP
860
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
Table 1
Basic fuel properties. Source Petrobras (2011).
Gasoline
Density (kg/m3)
MON
RON
Carbon (%)
Hydrogen (%)
Oxygen (%)
Fuel formulation
Heat value (MJ/kg)
RVP (kPa)
Hydrous ethanol
E25 (H0)
(H30)
(H50)
(H80)
(H100)
748.2
85.1
97.3
73.3
13.7
13
CH22O0.13
38.92
55.9
754.9
88
>100
64.3
13.4
22.3
CH25O0.26
34.68
52.5
779.2
89.7
>100
59.5
13.3
27.2
CH27O0.34
31.84
47.2
797.7
91.6
>100
53.9
13.1
33
CH29O0.48
27.59
33
808.7
91.8
>100
50.7
13
36.3
CH30O0.53
24.76
15.4
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
Equivalence ratio
Gasoline
E100
Fig. 1. Laminar flame speed for gasoline and E100. [Source EPA].
1,5
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
861
Table 2
Baseline engine specifications.
Engine type
Stroke
Bore
Displacement
Compression ratio
Number of valves per cylinder
Fuel type
Injection system
Turbocharger over-boost
4 Cylinders4 stroke
84 mm
72 mm
1368 cc
9.3:1
4
Gasoline or ethanol
PFI
0.35 bar
862
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
Mixture preparaon
& Combuson
Characterizaon in
a Single Cylinder
Engine ( E100 PFI )
with baseline
Combuson
Chamber layout
New Combuson
chamber
opmizaon for DI
operaon in Single
Cylinder Engine
Numerical
Simulaon to
support intake
design
New combuson
chamber layout
characterizaon in
Single Cylinder
Engine for PFI
operaon
First Prototype
Engine calibraon in
a 2 Tons passenger
car vehicle
Calibraon of
modied PFI
mulcylinder
prototype engine
with a single Turbo
Second
Mulcylinder
Prototype Engine
calibraon with
E100 in DI mode
with a single Turbo
Second Mulcylinder
Prototype Engine
Calibraon with E100 in
DI mode with a TwinStage Turbo.
Try
p Dcylinder
4
ca
Pn
i1 wi xi
Pn 2
i1 xi
Trz
p Dcylinder
4
ca
Pn
i1 mi xi ui yi
P
n
2
2
i1 xi yi
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
863
Swirl/Tumble ratios
2
1,5
1
0,5
0
-0,5
-1
680
730
780
830
880
930
980
1030
1080
Crank Angle []
X Tumble
Y Tumble
Swirl
heads, the design of the intake valve seat was made to decrease
the seat thickness as much as permissible, according to robustness
criteria (Fig. 11). The layout of the roof profile of the heads was
non-symmetrical as the area around the intake valve seat had a
1.5 mm shrouding profile and that around the exhaust valve a
3.5 mm profile (Fig. 12).
Finally, to take better advantage of the new strong swirl flow
field, the spark plug position on the 8-valve head was repositioned
at 10.7 mm away from its original center position (Fig. 13).
This also procured space for the mounting of a direct fuel injector in a central position, which is well suited for the application of a
SG mixture preparation approach for the EDI system introduced
later.
5.1. Some comments on the 8-valve head performance
864
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
10.7 mm
6. Results from the different engine layouts
Cylinder
Head
Moving
Plane
1
kMAX kMIN
kMAX
Pisto
Fig. 14. Color map in moving in-cylinder plane. (For interpretation of the references
to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this
article.)
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
865
oscillates between 22 and 24. This behavior is not far from the
ideal behavior of a CA-window of 30 found in the works published
by MIT [34]. In this work is stated by J.B. Heywood, amongst others,
that if the peak efficiency for the 1090% burn ratio lies within the
30 CA-window then a regular well-controlled monotonically running combustion process will be the result. This is important
because if the imposed in-cylinder swirl flow field is tuned to dissipate in synchronization with the burn duration a maximum efficiency is achieved and thereby an increase in engine performance
and a decrease in fuel consumption. Fig. 22 shows the data
obtained by the MIT team.
7. Introduction of high-pressure DI injection
Fig. 16. In-cylinder k-distribution.
866
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
To get comparative information at equal torque and power conditions between data of the down-sized baseline engine and the
2.4-l NA-engine, both engines were mounted on the engine test
rig. Fig. 27a shows the performance of the baseline down-sized
and down-speeded engine equipped with a single stage turbocharger for comparison with the 2.4-l NA engine.
Fig. 27b shows the comparative performance of the 2.4-l
NA-engine under similar conditions. The data are obtained by
fuelling the 1.4-l engine with E100 and the 2.4-l NA-engine with
E22. The maximum power output is similar for both engines
(141 kW) with a corresponding torque around 180 N m and
200 N m, but the 1.4-l engine produces these values at 3800 RPM,
whereas for the 2.4-l engine the values are reached at 6000 RPM.
Fig. 27c shows the power performances of both engines in the
same graphic. It can be seen that the maximum power delivered
by the down-sized and down-speeded 1.4-l engine equipped with
the single-stage compressor (Fig. 20) is higher than its higher displacement counter parts at the same speed. The 2.4 l NA-engine is
originally mounted in the vehicle chosen for mounting of the
down-sized 1.4-l turbocharged engine. However, this same vehicle
is equally available with a 3.0-l NA V6 engine. As all three engines
mount in the same vehicle frame it is meaningful to compare the
down-sized engine to both high displacement engines. Comparison
with the 2.4-l engine shows a down-sizing capability of 42% by the
substitution with the 1.4-l engine. This same data for the 3.0-l
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
867
Fig. 22. Engine efficiency and burn duration versus lambda at 1500 rpm source
SAE 2006-01-0229.
The mounting of both the 1.4-l down-sized engine and the 2.4-l
NA engine in the same vehicle frame was made. For the downsized and down-speeded engine the gear ratios were adapted to
obtain a good drivability and the maximum possible gain in fuel
consumption. Also, the software in the ECU had to be adapted to
both advanced turbo control and the use of DI injector control,
allowing more than one injection per stroke (convenient for
stratified operation). The availability of both engines in the same
868
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
869
Table 3
Main vehicle parameters.
Mass M (kg)
Frontal area A (m2)
Drag coefficient Cd
Rolling tyre radius R (m)
Baseline transmission
Baseline transmission ratios
Optimize transmission
Optimize transmission ratios
Final drive ratio
1809
2694
0.368
0.36215
4-speed automatic
2.842/1.570/1.000/0.690
6-speed manual
3.909/2.118/1.361/0.978/0.756/0.622
4280
It was also seen that the inertia to reach very high BMEP values
at low-end torque during transient operation proved to be the
main factor that limits the maximum reachable BMEP. Finally
a very important point to commercialize this approach is to
comply with the NVH standards in spite of the obtained high
870
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
Table 4
Overall engine performances.
Engine type
35,2:
38,5:
36,1:
38,5:
43,5:
44,0:
195:
141:
106:
118:
141:
208:
16.9:
18,3:
19,5:
13,9:
11,6:
10,1:
[1132]
[1159]
[1710]
[2690]
[3230]
[3250]
(6200)
[5800]
[5750]
[3750]
[3750]
[5500]
[28,2]
[27,7]
[21,2]
[37,8]
[41,3]
[42,5]
10. Summary/conclusions
To enhance the combustion behavior of a 1.4-l down-sized turbocharged baseline engine running with hydrated pure ethanol
(E100) a study was made to compare the combustion behavior of
this engine to series produced high-displacement NA-engines.
The purpose of the study was to prove the possibility to substitute
these high-displacement engines by the down-sized turbocharged
EDI-engine.
J.G.C. Bata et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 105 (2015) 858871
[6] Pontoppidan M, Bonfiglioli S, Damasceno F, Montanari G. Mixture preparation
optimization by CFD of a flex-vehicle (gasoline/ethanol) intake system layout.
SAE-Brazil paper; 2004 No do Resumo 118.
[7] Pontoppidan M, Bonfiglioli S, Montanari, Ewald P. Description of technology
development methods used to implement ethanol mixture preparation
systems on both automotive and aviation SI-engines. In: Proceedings of XVI
ISAF-convention on alcohol fuels, Rio de Janeiro, Section: Infrastructure,
Consumption and Environment; November 2006.
[8] Beazley R. EBDI application of a high BMEP down-sized spark ignited engine.
Michigan congress DEER 2009. <http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/
pdfs/deer_2009/session5/deer09_beazley.pdf>.
[9] Boretti Alberto. Towards 40% efficiency with BMEP exceeding 30 bar in
directed injected, turbocharged, spark ignition ethanol engines. Energy Convers
Manage 2012;57:15466.
[10] Pollice G, Diana S, Giglio V, Iorio B, Rispoli N. Down-sizing of SI engines by
turbocharging. In: Proceeding of ESDA 200695215, Torino ASME Conference;
July 2006.
[11] Lake T, Stokes J, Murphy R, Osborne R, et al. Turbocharging concepts for downsized DI gasoline engines. SAE paper 2004-01-0036.
[12] Wirth M, Mayerhofer U, Piock WF, Fraidl GK. Turbocharging the DI gasoline
engine. SAE paper 2000-01-0251.
[13] Bayomi Nazih N, Abd El-Maksoud Rafea M. Two operating modes for
turbocharger system. Energy Convers Manage 2012;58:5965.
[14] Su Jianye, Xu Min, Li Tie, Gao Yi, Wang Jiasheng. Combined effects of cooled
EGR and a higher geometric compression ratio on thermal efficiency
improvement of a down-sized boosted spark-ignition directed-injection
engine. Energy Convers Manage 2014;78:6573.
[15] Chen Longhua, Li Tie, Yin Tao, Zheng Bin. A predictive model for knock onset in
spark-ignition engines with cooled EGR. Energy Convers Manage 2014;87:
94655.
[16] Bechtold RL. Alternative fuels guidebool. SAE International; 1997.
[17] Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. McGraw-Hill; 1988.
[18] Hou S, Schmidt DP. Interaction mechanisms between closely spaced sprays.
SAE Paper 2008-01-0946.
[19] Hung DLS, Zhu GG, Winkelman JR, Stuecken T, Schock H, Fedews A. A high
speed flow visualization study of fuel spray pattern effect on mixture
formation in a low pressure direct injection gasoline engine. SAE Paper
2007-01-1411.
[20] Mitroglou N, Nouri JM, Gavaises M, Arcoumanis. Spray structure generated by
multi-hole injectors for gasoline direct-injection engines. SAE Paper 2007-011417.
871