Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 28 September 2014
Accepted 6 October 2014
Key words:
Esophageal atresia
Anastomotic stricture
Index
Prognostic tool
a b s t r a c t
Background: Anastomotic stricture is the most common complication following repair of esophageal atresia. An
Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture Index (EASI) based on the postoperative esophagram may identify patients
at high risk of stricture formation.
Methods: Digital images of early postoperative esophagrams of patients undergoing EA repair from 2005 to 2013
were assessed. Demographics and outcomes including dilations were prospectively collected. Upper (U-EASI)
and lower (L-EASI) pouch ratios were generated using stricture diameter divided by maximal respective
pouch diameter. Score performances were evaluated with area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) and
the Fisher's exact test for single and multiple (N3) dilatations. Interrater agreement was evaluated using the
intraclass correlation coefcient (ICC).
Results: Forty-ve patients had esophagrams analyzed; 28 (62%) required dilatation and 19 received N 3
(42%). U-EASI and L-EASI ratios ranged from 0.17 to 0.70, with L-EASI outperforming the U-EASI as follows:
L-EASI AUC: 0.66 for a single dilatation, 0.65 for N 3 dilatations; U-EASI AUC: 0.56 for a single dilatation, 0.67
for N3 dilatations. All patients with an L-EASI ratio of 0.30 (n = 8) required multiple esophageal dilatations,
p = 0.0006. The interrater ICC was 0.87.
Conclusion: The EASI is a simple, reproducible tool to predict the development and severity of anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia repair and can direct postoperative surveillance.
2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
and outcomes within and between institutions, and may aid in identifying patients at high risk of stricture formation with the potential to improve patient surveillance and inform parental counseling.
1. Methods
With IRB approval (11-267-PED), a single institution retrospective
review was conducted on all patients treated within our esophageal
atresia multidisciplinary clinic between 2005 and 2013. Patients were
included for analysis if they had an early postoperative esophagram
available on the Picture Archives and Communication System (PACS)
through Intelerad Distributed Radiology Solutions (Montreal, Canada).
Patients were excluded from analysis if they failed to undergo early
postoperative imaging, did not have an esophageal anastomosis
(H-type stula), or had inadequate imaging to create stricture index ratios. As part of routine follow-up, demographic information and characteristics of these patients were collected, including, gender, birth
weight, EA subtype and associated anomalies. Patient outcomes were
tracked, including survivorship, number of endoscopic dilatations performed, need for medical adjuncts during dilatations and the need for
reoperative surgery.
The EASI was generated after uoroscopic evaluation of the upper
gastrointestinal (GI) tract in the early postoperative period (postoperative days 510) using digital images that could be enlarged and
108
manipulated as needed to obtain ratios. Two pouch ratios were generated by using the narrowest stricture diameter well lled with contrast,
divided by the maximal upper and lower respective pouch diameter
for the upper (U-EASI) and lower (L-EASI). Anteroposterior and lateral
projections were averaged to obtain ratios with equal weight on each
view for the U-EASI and L-EASI as demonstrated in the following
equations, (Fig. 1):
UEASI :
Table 1
Demographic and outcome data for esophageal atresia patients included in the analysis.
Demographic data (n = 45)
Female gender, n (%)
Gestational age (median, range)
Birth weight (mean SD)
Atresia subtype
Type C, n (%)
Type D, n (%)
Type A, n (%)
Type B, n (%)
Outcome (n = 45)
Survival, n (%)
Length of stay (median, range)
Days of parenteral nutrition (median, range)
23 (51.1%)
38 weeks (2941)
3.12 kg 744.3 g
39 (87%)
3 (6.7%)
2 (4.4%)
1 (2.2%)
45 (100%)
14 days (8167)
7 days (3133)
2. Results
Of 72 patients EA patients evaluated over the study period, forty-ve
were ultimately included in the analysis. Four patients were excluded
because they had an H-type stula, 9 failed to undergo an early postoperative esophagram and 11 patients had early esophagrams that
predated their acquisition on digital media. Three patients had inadequate digital imagery for interpretation of EASI ratios. Demographic
More than half of EA patients who undergo surgical repair will develop signicant postoperative complications, with anastomotic stricture being the most common [3]. No reliable and widely-used tool has
been described to predict the development of AS after EA repair. The
predisposing factors for the formation of anastomotic stricture have
been identied as anastomotic leakage, anastomotic tension, increased
length of esophageal gap between the upper and lower pouch, suture
Fig. 1. Esophageal Atresia Stricture index (EASI) measurement. Note that the ratio is unitless and calculated automatically when measuring d/D, where d = stricture diameter
and D = diameter of esophageal pouch.
109
an anastomotic leak. Nambirajan et al [12] also used the upper pouch diameter, only as measured during contrast esophagram.
The EASI is a simpler formulation (d/D), and we considered both the
lower and upper pouches independently in our validation. Our data
demonstrates that the lower pouch stricture ratio, L-EASI, is superior
in determining the prognosis for an EA patient. An L-EASI of 0.30 is
highly correlated with requiring a course of dilatation. This dichotomization allows for identifying patients at increased risk of AS; surveillance and counseling can be tailored accordingly. The range for L-EASI
(0.170.7) was larger than that of the U-EASI (0.120.52). It was observed on the esophagrams that the upper pouch is consistently dilated,
likely caused by chronic obstruction in utero. The lower pouch therefore
provides a more accurate reection of the true esophageal diameter,
and should form the basis of the EASI. Should the EASI be 0.3, the family should be counseled about the high risk of AS and its signs, and a repeat esophagram could be done at the rst appearance of symptoms.
Early identication of an AS increases the likelihood of treating the stricture prior to the development of dense brosis [9]. Some may wish to
forfeit any repeat esophagram to reduce exposure to ionizing radiation
and proceed with esophagoscopy and dilatation under general anesthesia GA, but the risks of affecting neurocognitive developmental from repeat GA in infants have to be taken into consideration as well [13].
Anastomotic stricture after EA repair is common. The intent of EASI
is to create an easy, reproducible tool to predict the development and
severity of AS that pediatric surgeons and gastroenterologists can use
to identify patients at risk. Incorporation into current practice patterns
appears straightforward. Baird et al [3] proposed an algorithm for the
management of AS (Fig. 3), which has been modied to incorporate
the EASI evaluation during the postoperative esophagram. This tool
can guide the frequency of follow-up visits as well as the scheduling
of contrast studies or upper endoscopy to investigate symptoms. The
EASI can also be used in the future to correlate the severity of strictures
with the efcacy of various treatment methods (dilatation interval,
intralesional steroids, topical Mitomycin C, stents, etc.). The EASI may
also be used in the future to compare anastomotic techniques in patient
registries such as EUROCAT [14]. Ideally, it should be further evaluated
Table 2
Contingency table of Lower Esophageal Atresia Stricture Index (L-EASI) on the need for dilatation after esophageal atresia repair using 0.3 as a cut-point.
Table 3
Contingency table of Lower Esophageal Atresia Stricture (L-EAS) on the need for multiple
dilatations after esophageal atresia repair using 0.3 as a cut-point.
Stricture ratio
Needed dilatation
0.30
N0.30
Total
8
20
28
0
17
17
p = 0.02
Stricture ratio
N3 dilatations
3 dilatations
0.30
N0.30
Total
8
12
19
0
25
26
p = 0.0006
110
Fig. 3. An algorithm for management of esophageal anastomotic stricture adapted from by Baird et al. incorporating the Esophageal Atresia Stricture Index (EASI).