Reservoir Properties Input

Based upon the Stanford SUPRI-HW results.

PROPRIETARY; Copyright Amoco Corporation 1998
Enter values only in shaded cells
Applicable only to horizontal oil wells located close to the gas-oil contact in anisotropic reservoirs.
Select unit set:
Geometry:
Total oil column thickness
Well depth below gas-oil contact
Length of well lateral
Width of reservoir perpendicular to well
Wellbore radius
Rock properties:
Porosity
Horizontal permeability
Vertical permeability
Fluid properties:
Initial oil volume factor (Bo)
Initial gas volume factor (Bg)
Initial solution gas-oil ratio (Rs)

Page 1

Reservoir Properties Input

Geometry:
Total oil column thickness
Well depth below gas-oil contact
Length of well lateral
Width of reservoir perpendicular to well
Wellbore radius

48
24
2400
7200
0.35

Rock properties:
Porosity
Horizontal permeability
Vertical permeability

0.23 fractional
460 md
23 md

Fluid properties:
Initial oil volume factor (Bo)
Initial gas volume factor (Bg)
Initial solution gas-oil ratio (Rs)
Oil density at standard conditions
Water density at standard conditions
Gas density at standard conditions
Reservoir oil viscosity
Reservoir gas viscosity
Total liquid production rate

1.343
0.778
0.739
51.54
62.43
0.04701
0.456
0.0255

ft
ft
ft
ft
ft

Bbl/STB
Bbl/MSCF
MSCF/STB
lb/SCF
lb/SCF
lb/SCF
cp
cp

2000 STB/day

Page 2

Relative Permeability Input

Relative Permeability Input Data

krg
0
0
0.005
0.013
0.021
0.032
0.058
0.1
0.105
0.13
0.15
0.18
0.24
0.27
0.34
0.45
0.55
0.7
0.9
1

Relative Permeability Fits

kro
1
0.95
0.77
0.71
0.65
0.61
0.52
0.37
0.36
0.28
0.24
0.18
0.12
0.09
0.054
0.034
0.017
0.009
0.001
0

1.2

Gas Data Normallized

Gas Fit
Oil Data Normallized

Oil Fit
Norm alized Relative Pe rm

sg (fractional)
0
0.02282
0.10267
0.12548
0.1483
0.17116
0.21675
0.27378
0.28519
0.31946
0.34223
0.37645
0.43349
0.46772
0.52475
0.57039
0.62742
0.68446
0.79854
0.859

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0

0.4

0.6

0.8

Sg Norm alize d

ang
ano
n

sgstar

0.141

0.2

###
###
20

sostar

0
1
0.026566
1
0.119523 0.973434
0.146077 0.880477
0.172643 0.853923

Page 3

rkgstar
0
0
0.005
0.013
0.021

rkostar
1
1
0.95
0.77
0.71

fg

fo
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###

sw num?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

1.2

Relative Permeability Input

0.199255
0.252328
0.318719
0.332002
0.371898
0.398405
0.438242
0.504645
0.544494
0.610885
0.664016
0.730407
0.79681
0.929616
1
#N/A

0.827357
0.032
0.65
0.800745
0.058
0.61
0.747672
0.1
0.52
0.681281
0.105
0.37
0.667998
0.13
0.36
0.628102
0.15
0.28
0.601595
0.18
0.24
0.561758
0.24
0.18
0.495355
0.27
0.12
0.455506
0.34
0.09
0.389115
0.45
0.054
0.335984
0.55
0.034
0.269593
0.7
0.017
0.20319
0.9
0.009
0.070384
1
0.001
0 #N/A
0 #N/A
#N/A
#N/A

Page 4

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
#N/A

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No

Recommended Simulation Grid

Simulation Grid Recommendation for Horizontal Oil Wells Subject to Gas Coning
Based upon the Stanford SUPRI Horizontal Well results.
PROPRIETARY; Copyright Amoco Corporation 1998
Applicable only to horizontal oil wells located close to the gas-oil contact in anisotropic reservoirs.

Computed grid refinements:

DX
DZ

### ft
### ft
Refine grid row beyond well
ends to a length of DX. Then
double the length of each
succeeding row up to the field
simulation grid size.

Top View of Refined Simulation Grid

Refine gridding
perpendicular to the
well trajectory as
follows: For the row
containing the well
completions and for
a row on either side
of the well, use a
width of DX. Then,
double succeeding
grid widths up to the
field simulation grid
size.

Well

Page 5

Recommended Simulation Grid

Side View of Refined Simulation Grid

Well

GOC
Refine layers
from GOC
through
horizontal well
to a thickness of
DZ.

Page 6

Predicted Coning Performance

Predicted Gas Coning Performance for Horizontal Oil Wells

Based upon the Stanford SUPRI Horizontal Well results.
PROPRIETARY; Copyright Amoco Corporation 1998
Applicable only to horizontal oil wells located close to gas-oil contact in anisotropic reservoirs.

### days

C u m O il P r o d u c tio n , M M Bb l

Oil Rate , Bbl/day

Computed gas breakthrough time:

Oil Rate vs. Time

2500

2000

Cum Oil vs. Time

1
0.9
0.8

1500

0.7
0.6

1000

0.5
0.4

500

0.3
0.2
0.1

0
0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Gas -Oil Ratio , M SC F/ST B

Tim e , Days

Gas-Oil Ratio vs. Time

0.80
0.70
0.60

Page 7

O il Re c o v e r y Fa c t o r , Fr a c t io n a l

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Tim e , Days

Oil Recovery Factor vs. Time

1
0.9

0.7

0.8

0.9

O il Re c o v e r y Fa c t o r , Fr a c t io n a l

Gas -Oil Ratio , M SC F/ST B

Predicted Coning Performance

Gas-Oil Ratio vs. Time

0.80
0.70

Oil Recovery Factor vs. Time

1
0.9

0.60

0.8

0.50

0.7

0.40

0.6
0.5

0.30

0.4

0.20

0.3

0.10

0.2
0.1

0.00
0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Tim e , Days

0
0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Tim e , Days

Page 8

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Predicted Coning Performance

dt

###

n_points

200

ovol

Time, Days

Oil Rate, Bbls/Day

2000
2000
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

Gas Cut
0
0
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

0
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

fmm
fhm
fom
fqm
fxm
fqxm
em

163.87

GOR Cum Oil, Bbls

0.74
0
0.74
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Page 9

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
Fractional Oil Recovery
0
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Predicted Coning Performance

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Page 10

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Predicted Coning Performance

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Page 11

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Predicted Coning Performance

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Page 12

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Predicted Coning Performance

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Page 13

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Predicted Coning Performance

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Page 14

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Predicted Coning Performance

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Page 15

###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Predicted Coning Performance

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

#MACRO?
#MACRO?
#MACRO?

###
###
###

###
###
###

###
###
###

Page 16

###
###
###

0.7

Predicted Coning Performance

0.8

0.9

Page 17

.7

Predicted Coning Performance

0.8

0.9

Page 18

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 19

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 20

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 21

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 22

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 23

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 24

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 25

Predicted Coning Performance

Page 26