Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Number
Study
Year
Level of Analysis
2003
2003
3
4
5
2000
2001
2003
Manufacturing plants
employee (sales and
insurance agents)
Plant and individual;
40 plants; 4374 workers
Semiconductor firms
firm (Indian)
6
7
8
2001
2000
2001
1996
Establishment
10
1996
11
12
2000
2000
Firm (Singapore)
13
14
15
Bartel
Bartel, Freeman, Ichniowski, & Kleiner
16
17
18
19
Batt
Batt, Colvin & Keefe
Bayo-Moriones & Huerta-Arribas
Becker & Huselid
2002
2002
2002
1996
20
21
22
23
1998
1999
1996
1999
Firm
Find this
Firm (apparel)
Fortune 100 firms
62
Batt
Sample
HPWS Indicator
operational performance
107
HRM Practices
215 sales;
perceived organizational
197 insurance agents support (HR practices) voluntary turnover
Quality, productivity
labor costs; ee outcomes
45-3622
HRM Systems
productivity, defects
23 fabs
Employment System
Org commitment
7
HR Practices
attitude to change;
teaming
job satisfaction
401
138
HRM Strategy
Perceived performance
110
Quality of work life
Stock Price
Quality, productivity
labor costs; ee outcomes
328 periods
Team program
sales, profitability,
customer satisfaction
2618 store months Incentive pay
Internally oriented
Successful implementation
HR Practices
of HPWS
105
3 branches
(63-150 ee's)
Find this
202
270
302
719
check
548 - 699
Find this
117-131 ee's (2 firms)
81
HRM Systems
Subjective assessment
foreign parent's satisfaction
w/performance
24
2002
Firm (manufacturing)
Chinese/Western joint
ventures & subsidiaries
25
26
1997
2000
Establishment
Private establishments
1621
1621
find this
HPWS
27
28
2001
2001
Private establishments
Review
1621
HR Practices
29
30
1999
1998
6
380
31
Firm
1031
32
2002
Firm (large)
1216
33
34
35
2000
2000
1995
101
4
46
36
1999
Establishment
8/14/2003
find
Performance
Measure
HR Strategy;
HRM practices
Org Design
Computer capital;
work practices
Computer investment;
work practices
HR practices;
leadership values
HR practices
HR Practices
Work practices
Effect
Main Effect? InteractionSize
Weak
NA
yes
Yes
Yes
Mixed
Yes
NA
NA
NA
Partial
NA
NA
na
No
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Weak SuppNA
Mixed
Yes
Find this
Mixed
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Find this
Yes
Mixed
NA
na
16-26% increase
deposits & loans
NA
Find this
Find this
Weak
9.3% sales/ee
46% lower TO;
16.3% sales grth
Partial
NA
NA
NA
NA
check
find out
$63K mkt value;
$4752 GRATE
Yes
Find this Find this
NA
NA
Yes
NA
Yes
NA
Productivity
Productivity
Productivity (Cobb-Douglas
Production Function)
Yes
Yes
Mixed
Yes
NA
If all HPWS, +20%
productivity
NA
yes
NA
NA
Industry leadership
Information technology
N
Yes
NA
Yes
Stock price
Yes
Mixed
market/book
Yes
NA
NA
NA
+$1 installed computer
capital->+$5 mkt value
+$1 computer
investment=> $10 mv
Yes
NA
Mixed
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Weak
Yes
NA
IPO
HR strategy
Strategy
Efficiency (labor costs &
productivity)
Number
60
61
HPWS Indicator
Hr Practices;
knowledge creatiion
Collins, Smith, & Stevens,
2001 High technology firms
78
Colvin, Batt & Katz
2001 establishment (telecom)
242
HR Practices
Conyon & Read
1998 Firm
139
HRM Practices
Profit sharing plans
Cormier, Magnan & St-Onge
2001 Bank SBU's
95 - 1148
perception of profit
sharing
Coyle-Shapiro, Morrow, Richardson & Dunn
2002 employee (Engineering)
141
D'Arcimoles
1997 Firms
61
HR Policies
Das, Handfield, Calantone & Shosh
2000 Manufacturing firms
290
Quality Management
Deery & Iverson
1999 Bank branches
460 banks; 1145 ees IR climate
Delaney
1997 find this
find this
find this
Delaney & Huselid
1996 Firm (34 industries)
590
HR practices
Delery & Doty
1996 Firm (banks)
101
HR practices
Delery, Gupta, Shaw, Jenkins, & Ganster
2000 Trucking Cos
379 HR Practices
Dunlop & Weil
1996 Business Units
42
Modular production
Work practices (TQM
teams)
Eriksson
2001 Firm (Denmark)
1605
Fernie & Metcalf
1995 find this
find this
find this
Fey & Bjorkman
2000 Subsidiaries (in Russia)
101
HRM practices
Fey, Bjorkman, & Pavlovskaya
2000 Firms (Russia)
101
HRM practices
Freeman, Kleiner, & Ostroff
1997 Firm
260
Employee Involvement
Fynes & Voss
2001 Manufacturing plants (Ireland)
200
Quality practices
Gant, Ichniowski, & Shaw
find this
find this
find this
find this
HR practices;
org citizenship
Gardner, Moynihan, & Wright
2002 Business Unit
40 (one firm)
219 orgs; 70,684
observations
Gerhart & Milkovich
1990 BU's and firms
Human capital
Gould-Williams
2003
HR practices;
effectiveness
Guest, Michie, Conway, Trenberth, McDonald 2001 Firm (mfg & service)
237
Guest & Pecci
1997
Partnership Organizations
54
partnership practices
62
2001
63
Guthrie
2001
Firms
64
65
Guthrie
Guthrie, Spell & Nyamori
1999
2002
66
1999
Firm (Israel)
67
2003
Firm (Israel)
68
69
2001
2001
Firms (UK)
Law firms
70
71
72
73
74
Hoque
Huang
Huang
Hunter & Hitt
Hunter & Lafkas
1999
2000
2001
Unpub
2003
75
76
Huselid
Huselid & Becker
1995
1995
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
8/14/2003
Study
Year
Level of Analysis
members of IPA
Hotels
Firms (Taiwan)
Firms (Taiwan)
Retail banks and branches
Bank branches
Firm
Firm
Sample
54
164
164
137 - 165
76
partnership practices
Performance
Measure
Sales growth
Manager Pay
Productivity
ROA
Org commitment;
trust in management
Firm performance
ROA, sales growth
productivity
find this
Perceived performance
Profitability
Quit rate
Lead time, profitability
yes
Mixed
Yes
Yes
find this
Yes
Yes
Mixed
Weak Support
na
na
NA
NA
Mixed
NA
Yes
NA
find this
find this
Weak SuppNA
Weak SuppNA
NA
NA
NA
Productivity
find this
Performance
Performance (subjective)
Productivity
Quality
find this
Yes
find this
Weak
Yes
Weak Support
Yes
find this
Mixed
find this
NA
NA
NA
NA
find this
NA
find this
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mixed
Yes
Yes
Yes
Mixed
NA
NA
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
find this
quality; profitability
Yes
NA
Org performance
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Mixed
NA
HR practices
Productivity; ee retention
HIWP
HIWP
Retention; productivity
performance
org perf perception;
market performance
indiv. HR Practices
HR practices and
fairness in promotion
102
SHRM(mkt. orientation
as mediator)
342
93 (252 observations) Human capital
Effect
Main Effect? InteractionSize
Org effectiveness
Subjective Performance
(sales growth, market share)
Firm performance
commitment; job satisfaction;
209
High commitment practiceproductivity, quality; perf.
Subjective firm performance
315
HRM Practices
Subjective firm performance
315
HRM Practices
35 branches (101 banksFlexibility; commitment productivity; sales
303
Work practices
Wages
Turnover, stock value
profitability
816
HRM Systems
628
HRM systems
Market value
NA
NA
yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Weak
Trng only
Yes
Yes
na
high HIWP= + $184K
productivity
Low HIWP= -$89K
high HIWP= + $184K
productivity
Low HIWP= -$89K
na
NA
NA
Partial
Yes
na
Yes
Mixed
NA
weak
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Mixed
Mixed
Yes
Weak
Yes
Yes
na
NA
NA
NA
NA
**********
NA
7% TO; $27K sales
Weak Supp$19K mv; $4K profits
NA
$38K - $73K market valu
Number
Study
Year
Level of Analysis
77
78
1996
1997
Firm
Firm
79
80
81
82
1997
1990
1999
1997
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
1999
1999
1983
1996
1999
2000
1996
2000
2001
1998
1998
2001
2003
1996
1999
2002
Firms
Business Unit
41 steel productions
36 steel production lines
individual (customers of
telecommunications co.)
First tier suppliers
Automotive plants
Establishment (mfg plants)
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Li
Lieberman, Lau & Williams
Liouville & Bayad
Lowe, Delbridge, & Oliver
MacDuffie
Martell & Carroll
Firm (Singapore)
Business unit
Firm
Restaurant chain
Firm (Finland)
218
548
HPWS Indicator
HRM Strategy
HRM Systems
293
176
2594 monthly periods
2190 line periods
HRM Effectiveness
HRM Systems
HRM Systems
HRM Systems
2491
57
18 (176 observations)
301-1301
customer satisfaction
HRM Practices
IR systems
Group participation
Financial performance
Subjective mfg. Performance
Quality and efficiency
Hours per unit of output
194
318-319
658 (195 public)
28
428
HR Practices
HRM Sophistication
Work life programs
EE attitudes & behaviors
Hr policies; HR bundles
Performance
Productivity
Productivity
Profitability
Subjective performance
726
1884
48
138
148
Innovation
Innovation Performance
Firm performance
Financial performance
HR configurations
MNEs (China)
296
Motor vehicle manufacturers
6
find this
find this
Plant
71
Establishment (auto assembly)
57
Business Units
115
2003
1990
1998
1997
1995
1995
1996
1997
Establishment
587
flexibility, teamwork
109
110
111
2001
2000
2000
Establishment
ROVA
individual
688-703
63
281
112
113
1998
2001
Firm
114
115
116
117
118
119
2003
2001
1996
Unpub
1998
find
120
121
122
8/14/2003
In Press firm
2002 Firm; BU; plant;field office
find
1997
2001
Firm (manufacturing)
Firm (manufacturing)
banks
Performance
Measure
Profitability, stock value
Profitability, stock value
Firm performance;
productivity
Productivity, firm value
Quality, productivity
Quality, productivity
HRM practices
HRM Practices
High involvement mgt
Org commitment
Employment modes
Employment modes/
flexibility
HIWP
higher pay, long-term
employment policy
Labor utilization
find this
HR Practices
HRM policies
Executive HRM practices
Firm (Danish)
Firm (Danish)
Mfg firms (Korean)
Firm (Korean manufacturing)
firm
Sample
148
249 - 457
487
HR practices
Organizational IQ
HRM practices
HRM practices
Firm performance
Performance
turnover, productivity,
profitability(ROA, sales/ee)
Productivity
find this
productivity
Production
Performance
Financial Performance
subjective financial
performance
ROS, ROVA, Growth
Employee commitment
Innovative activities:
R&D, new technology
Effect
Main Effect? InteractionSize
+1sd HPWS= +q14%
& GRATE + 13-28%
Yes
NA
Yes
NA
+1sd HPWS= $41000
sales $44K; MV: $9K;
cash flow $9673
Mixed
NA
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
NA
Na
Yes
Yes
NA
Mixed
Yes
Mixed
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
Weak
NA
Weak
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
No
Yes
na
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Mixed
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
find this
NA
Yes
NA
NA
find this
NA
mixed
NA
yes
Yes
Mixed
Yes
NA
NA
na
na
NA
Yes
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Find this
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Find this
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
mixed
NA
NA
na
Modest
Yes
Weak
No
Weak
Mixed
Yes
find this
Mixed
Yes
Mixed
Yes
Innovation activities
Firm performance
Find this
Efficiency, quality, time
Performance
Productivity; performance
Yes
Weak
Find this
Mixed
Yes
Yes
Productivity; performance
Productivity; performance
productiviey; turnover
Yes
Yes
Mixed
NA
Number
123
Study
Rogg, et al
Year
2001
Sample
351
124
Schuster
125
126
127
1997
1999
1998
Firm
Mfg Establishments (UK)
Firm (trucking)
1
118
141-148
128
2002
141; 379
129
130
131
132
133
Sheppeck
Sheppeck & Militello
Snell & Youndt
Spell, C.S.
Storey
1998
2000
1995
2001
2002
Firm
Theory piece
Firm
Employees
Middle sized companies
134
135
136
Takeuchi
Teo & Waters
Tier
2002
2002
find
Employees
White collar employees
Review
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
Tregaskis
Vandenberg, RIchardson & Eastman
Varma, Beatty, Schneier, & Ulrich
Voos
Way
Welbourne & Andrews
Welbourne & Cyr
West, Borrill, Dawson, Scully, Carter, Anelay,
West & Patterson
West, Patterson & Dawson
West, Patterson, Pillinger, & Nickell
Whiffield & Poole
Whitener
Wilkinson, Godfrey & Marchington
Wilmalasiri
Wood
1997
1999
1999
1987
2002
1996
1999
2002
1999
find
1999
1997
2001
1997
1995
1999
153
154
155
156
157
158
1998
1999
1998
1999
1996
2001
Petrochemical factories
Petrochemical factories
Firms
Find this
Establishment (mfg plants)
Firm (small and medium)
8/14/2003
find
Level of Analysis
Small business firms
2 (pilot studies)
106
102
139
314
HPWS Indicator
HR practices
Employee-centered
mgt (HR Index)
Employee-centered
mgt (HR Index)
ee involvement
HRM practices
Voluntary turnover;
HRM Investment
HRM practices;
mgt support for HRM
Firm
Firm
Firm
Bargaining units
Firm (small business)
IPO Firms
IPO Firms
269
109
NA
531 French;
879 U.K.
49 (3579 ee's)
39
343
446
82
360
Firm
Top management teams
Firm (manufacturing)
Review
Credit unions
establishment
1 publishing co.
Review
>100
42
81
NA
180 (1689 ee's)
9
151 employees
NA
HRM practices
Team processes
training
NA
HR practices
HR Practices
HRM Practices
NA
86
38
105
HR effectiveness
HR practices
HR practices
Find this
HR practices
HRM practices
Find this
97
74 (Chinese)
Performance
Measure
Customer satisfaction
Effect
Main Effect? InteractionSize
Yes
Yes
NA
Operating Income
Yes
NA
NA
Operating Income
ROS, ROA
Turnover
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
Org effectiveness
Yes
mixed
NA
Yes
Limited
Weak
mixed
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Employee development
Yes
Org effectiveness
Yes
Fin & operational perf
Yes
Yes
quality; productivity; labor cost
turnover; productivity
Mixed
Profitability, IPO price
Weak Support
Stock price growth
No
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mixed
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Productivity, performance
Yes
Productivity, performance
Yes
Innovation; firm performance
Yes
NA
NA
Org commitment
Yes
TQM
Non-empirical
Work performance
Yes
NA
NA
Perceived HR effectiveness
Financial performance
Mixed
Financial performance
Mixed
Sales/employee
Mixed
Find this
Find this
Perceived performance
Mixed
Firm performance
Mixed
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Find This
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Find this
NA
NA
Mixed
Yes
NA
No
NA
Yes
NA
Yes
NA
Find this Find this
Weak SuppFind this
Yes
NA