Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Workshop assignments

Student submitting their individual work

ID #

Other Team members if a group process was


used.

ID #

Lecturers name: Mike Elkin


Qualification: EDSML
Unit number, title and code

Unit level QCF 4/5:

Unit Strategic Project Development &


Implementation
Assignment number : 1

Assignment title:

Hand out: Week/Day

Date for
feedback

Formative deadlines:
23:59 Tuesday 8th
December 2015

Student to complete:
Date submitted

Immediate
/by...

Comment:

Summative /
DEADLINE
week /Day

Date for feedback

Hand in
mechanism

Student to
complete:
Date submitted

Comment:

Student(S) comment on assignment in terms of engagement, relevance and difficulty.

Student declaration: I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and
research sources are fully acknowledged using the Harvard system
Student signature / Electronic.
Notes for Tutor and Learners: The assignment is likely to offer some specified opportunities for
Merit and Distinction.
Within the whole unit is necessary to cover the range of M1-M3 descriptors for a Merit award to be
made, but only when having completed all the basic pass criteria. For a distinction to be awarded,
distinction descriptors D1-3 have to be covered across the unit. The Distinction can only be
awarded if all the Pass and Merit criteria have been successfully passed. The indicative
characteristics show a generic performance and the context note breaks it down into applications
to the task and a specific performance allied to that contextualised task. Not all the Descriptors for
M or D will be covered in any one assignment. Merit and Distinction performances can be clustered
together for a particular task and may address single criterion or multiple criteria within reason.
See below for an example for Merit.
Tutors see link and pages 13-21 for extra details.
http://www.edexcel.com/migrationdocuments/BTEC%20Higher%20Nationals%20from
%202010/BTEC%20Higher%20National%20in%20Business%20Delivery%20Guide.pdf

LO
/ACs
covere
d

LO 1/AC
1.1-1.2

Descriptor
for Merit or
Distinction

Indicative characteristics

Context note / reference:


Put in the task number/Assessment criteria reference.
Describes specifically and without ambiguity what the
learner needs to do in order to meet the performance
criteria for Merit or Distinction ( Task performance and
level)

E.g. MERIT
1: Identify
and apply
strategies
to find
appropriate
solutions

E.g. Complex problems


with more than one
variable have been
explored

E.g. Task 1: LO 1-1.1 and 1.2. This is met by


carrying out in- depth interviews which contain
relevant questions based on knowledge of quality
systems. To gain a Merit, learners will show
exploration of the different degrees of role and
interrelationships between them in ensuring
quality for each function. Evaluation will show
bottle-necks and offer solutions.

Actual Assignment Details


Learni
ng
outco
mes
/ACs

Task
match /
assesse
d on this
assignm
ent

Assessment criteria covered in this assignment. Tutor to


complete and to write tasks assessment to cover Pass,
together Merit and Distinction where allocated. Include
resources as necessary.

LO 1 Be able to develop a project specification

P/ M/D Met?
Feedback

1.1 Analyse the factors that contribute to the process of project


selection.
1.2 Develop outline project specifications for the implementation
of a new product, service or process
1.3 Produce a specification for an agreed project to implement a
new product, service or process.

Identify a number of possible projects that you could


choose to plan and implement.
Discuss the factors which caused you to select them.
(1.1)
Write an outline specification for two of them and of
those, select one and develop a much more detailed
specification. (1.2, 1.3)

Learners can utilise this space to submitted written or other work.


Ensure referenced supporting evidence is included.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen