Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
of
medicine
clinical problem-solving
From the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension (A.T., E.W.S.), and
the Division of Nephrology (J.L.S.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens
Hospital, Boston. Address reprint requests
to Dr. Turchin at the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham
and Womens Hospital, 221 Longwood
Ave., Boston, MA 02115, or at aturchin@
partners.org.
N Engl J Med 2003;349:1465-9.
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society.
This patient presents with immediate problems of abnormal liver function and hyponatremia. I would initially approach the problem of hyponatremia and then attempt to
find connections to her relevant medical history.
Hyponatremia may occur with a high, low, or normal serum osmolality. High osmolality indicates the presence of excessive extracellular osmoles leading to the entry of
intracellular water into the extracellular fluid and the dilution of the sodium in the extracellular fluid. High glucose levels are a typical cause of this condition, and the patient
may be at particular risk for hyperglycemia if she is taking glucocorticoids. Unlike
glucose, solutes that enter cells, such as urea or ethanol, do not cause intracellular-toextracellular water shift and thus do not cause hyponatremia.
Hyponatremia with low serum osmolality may be observed in patients with hypovolemia, states involving low cardiac output, liver disease, the nephrotic syndrome,
or the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. Hypoadrenalism
or thyroid deficiency must also be considered. Psychogenic polydipsia can also result
in hypo-osmolal hyponatremia and can be distinguished from the above causes by low
urine osmolality and often on the basis of the history.
When the serum osmolality is normal, the first consideration should be pseudohyponatremia, an artifact of measurement that is most commonly caused by severe degrees
of hypertriglyceridemia or chylomicronemia or by severe paraproteinemia. Hyponatremia with normal osmolality can also occur when more than one disorder is present.
For example, hypothyroid-induced hypo-osmolality could be offset by hyperglycemia.
To begin with, I would like to know whether the review of the patients systems and
the physical examination suggest extracellular volume depletion or fluid overload
and whether she has any stigmata of chronic liver disease. Levels of blood glucose, urea,
and osmolality, as well as urine osmolality and urine sodium, should be measured.
www.nejm.org
october 9, 2003
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CTR on May 30, 2006 .
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
1465
The
The patient reported a number of symptoms consistent with the presence of hypothyroidism, including decreased energy, weight gain, constipation,
dry skin, and new-onset hoarseness. Her medications included tacrolimus, prednisone (40 mg per
day), mycophenolate mofetil, ursodiol, atovaquone,
acyclovir, and clarithromycin. She was afebrile. Her
blood pressure was 130/75 mm Hg, and her heart
rate 80 beats per minute. The patient appeared to
be clinically euvolemic. She spoke slowly, with a
coarse voice. The thyroid was not palpable. The
skin was dry and cool, and the nails were brittle.
The reflexes had a slowed relaxation phase. The
patient had scleral icterus and moon facies. There
was no ascites.
The serum osmolality was 294 mOsm per kilogram, the urine osmolality 434 mOsm per kilogram, and the urinary sodium level 62 mmol per liter. The thyrotropin level was 72 U per milliliter,
the serum total thyroxine level 0.6 g per deciliter
(7.7 nmol per liter), the blood urea nitrogen level
43 mg per deciliter (15.4 mmol per liter), the serum
creatinine level 1.4 mg per deciliter (123.8 mol per
liter), and the serum glucose level 85 mg per deciliter (4.7 mmol per liter). Levothyroxine treatment
was begun.
of
medicine
It is notable that although the patients serum osmolality as measured by the freezing-point depression
was 294 mOsm per kilogram, her calculated osmolality (determined as [2the urine sodium level] +
[the blood urea nitrogen level2.8]+[the serum
glucose level18]) was 268 mOsm per kilogram. In
the absence of hyperglycemia or azotemia that could
account for the osmolal gap (the difference between
the measured osmolality and the calculated osmolality) of 26 mOsm per kilogram, we must consider another explanation for the patients apparent
pseudohyponatremia. I would like to know whether
the blood sample was lipemic; a further laboratory
workup should include the measurement of total
serum protein and a lipid profile in order to rule
out hyperproteinemia and hypertriglyceridemia.
Although hypothyroidism can cause hyponatremia, in this case it is at most a minor contributor,
since the patient does not have low serum osmolality. I would not expect levothyroxine replacement
to improve her serum sodium levels.
These findings are diagnostic of pseudohyponatremia caused by severe hypercholesterolemia. Whereas the instruments for routine chemical analysis
typically use indirect potentiometry (involving the
dilution of samples) to measure sodium levels, in
this case, the equipment for measuring arterial
blood gases, which relies on direct potentiometry,
was used. This latter method confirmed that there
was a normal serum sodium concentration.
It is important to emphasize that the treatment
of hypo-osmolal hyponatremia is very different from
the treatment of pseudohyponatremia, and going
down the wrong management path may harm the
patient. Fluid restriction, which is typically used to
correct hypo-osmolal hyponatremia, could, in a patient like this one, increase the already elevated serum osmolality. This effect could, in turn, worsen a
state of hyperviscosity, if one were present, or impair the blood flow in the microcirculation and aggravate any underlying hypercoagulability.
To treat this patient successfully, it is important
The serum sodium level remained low. The to- to determine the source of the unusually high chotal serum protein level was 5.1 g per deciliter. No lesterol levels. Hypothyroidism or tacrolimus can
1466
www.nejm.org
october 9 , 2003
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CTR on May 30, 2006 .
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
clinical problem-solving
raise the cholesterol level, but not to this degree. Although the laboratory reported that most of the
cholesterol was in the form of LDL cholesterol,
the LDL cholesterol levels were not measured directly, but were calculated. The formula for the calculation of the LDL cholesterol level (total cholesterol levelHDL cholesterol levelVLDL cholesterol
level [the VLDL cholesterol level is usually calculated by dividing the fasting triglyceride level by 5])
assumes that the cholesterol consists solely of HDL,
LDL, and VLDL fractions. In a patient with liver disease, however, another form of cholesterol could be
present: lipoprotein X, which has been described
in patients with severe cholestasis, such as those
with primary biliary cirrhosis or, as in this case, with
chronic graft-versus-host disease. Lipoprotein X is
formed when there is reflux of unesterified cholesterol and phospholipids into the circulation from
the cholestatic biliary ducts; the particles of this
form of cholesterol are not soluble in plasma water
and thus increase the solid fraction of plasma.
A lipoprotein analysis should be performed. Because high levels of lipoprotein X could result in a
hyperviscosity syndrome, the patient should be examined carefully for signs of hyperviscosity, such as
dilated, segmented, and tortuous retinal veins, resulting in a sausage-link appearance. The serum
viscosity should be measured, and if it is found to
be high (>3 centipoise), prophylactic lipid apheresis should be considered.
I agree with the decision to initiate colestipol therapy (particularly given that liver dysfunction is a contraindication to the use of most other lipid-lowering agents); in the absence of higher serum viscosity,
the decision to withhold apheresis was reasonable.
Since cholestasis induced by graft-versus-host disease is the primary cause of the patients extreme
hypercholesterolemia, successful management of
graft-versus-host disease will be crucial in correcting the dyslipidemia.
www.nejm.org
october 9, 2003
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CTR on May 30, 2006 .
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
1467
The
of
medicine
centration should be remeasured by direct poten- failure, or end-stage liver failure unlikely. These findtiometry.
ings are, however, consistent with the syndrome of
inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone.
Given the acute worsening of hyponatremia while The pulmonary disease is the most likely cause, althe cholesterol levels were improving, a second though stress, nausea, or pain (if these are present)
workup was performed. As measured by direct po- could also play a part.
tentiometry, the serum sodium level was 128 mmol
per liter. The serum osmolality was 269 mOsm per The syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antikilogram, the serum glucose level was 104 mg per diuretic hormone, presumably caused by the lung
deciliter (5.8 mmol per liter), the blood urea nitro- infections, was diagnosed, and fluid intake was
gen level was 29 mg per deciliter (10.4 mmol per li- restricted to 1500 ml daily. The serum sodium level
ter), the serum creatinine level was 1.5 mg per deci- (as determined by direct potentiometry) and the
liter (132.6 mol per liter), the urine osmolality was serum osmolality normalized within several days.
335 mOsm per kilogram, and the urinary sodium
level was 44 mmol per liter. Oxygenation progrescommentary
sively decreased.
Hyponatremia remains a common problem in hosAlthough there is still an osmolal gap (now de- pitalized patients, with a prevalence of up to 12 percreased to 23 mOsm per kilogram), there is now also cent.1 As the discussant notes, appropriate managetrue hypo-osmolality. Combined with the inappro- ment depends on distinguishing between two main
priately high osmolality of the urine, this points to categories of processes leading to a low laboratory
high levels of vasopressin. The absence of clinical sodium value: hypo-osmolar (or true) hyponatresigns of dehydration and the presence of a relative- mia versus iso-osmolar or hyperosmolar hyponatrely high urinary sodium level (particularly if there is mia, or pseudohyponatremia.
no oliguria) and inappropriately high urinary osmoHypo-osmolar hyponatremia is a serious delality make intravascular depletion, congestive heart rangement of homeostasis and can lead to lifethreatening complications, such as seizures or alterations in mental status; it requires careful correction.
In contrast, pseudohyponatremia is not, in itself,
Normal Fraction
Increased Fraction
dangerous, and the primary treatment is for the unof Solid-Phase Particles
of Solid-Phase Particles
derlying cause (in this case, hypercholesterolemia).
There may be more than one cause, as in the case
described above.
Pseudohyponatremia secondary to hyperlipidemia was originally described in the 1950s,2 when
electrolytes were measured by flame photometry.
Water phase
With this technique, the serum sample is diluted beSolid phase
fore the actual measurement is obtained. Therefore,
if more than the normal fraction of serum (7 percent
Standard volume
by volume) consists of proteins or lipids, the degree
of diluent added
of dilution is underestimated, resulting in artificially low sodium levels (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Artificially Low Ion Levels as Determined by Dilution-Based Methods.
In the 1980s, flame photometry began to be used
Normally, serum contains 7 percent solids by volume. In order to reduce the
less frequently, as direct potentiometry became more
volume of blood needed for analysis, serum is frequently diluted before the
common.3 In direct potentiometry, undiluted serum
actual measurement is obtained. The same volume of diluent is always used;
samples are used to measure the transmembrane
the degree of dilution is estimated under the assumption that the serum conpotentials resulting from electrolyte gradients, and
tains 7 percent solid-phase particles. When the fraction of solid-phase particles
the measurement is therefore not dependent on the
is increased, the same amount of diluent results in a greater dilution, unbewater content of the sample. Consequently, a numknownst to the laboratory personnel (right side of figure). Consequently, the
calculation of an ion level with the use of a degree of dilution that is based on
ber of major medical textbooks state that pseudothe incorrect fraction of solid-phase particles will lead to an underestimate.
hyponatremia is rarely encountered with the use of
modern instruments.4-6 However, more than two
1468
www.nejm.org
october 9 , 2003
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CTR on May 30, 2006 .
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
clinical problem-solving
lipoprotein X, and the incubation of bile lipoproteins with serum or albumin in vitro leads to the appearance of lipoprotein-Xlike particles.12 Levels
of lipoprotein X can be as high as several thousand
milligrams per deciliter of cholesterol. Aside from
interfering with laboratory tests and, in extreme
cases, causing the hyperviscosity syndrome,13 high
levels of lipoprotein X are not known to lead to any
pathologic consequences.
A systematic approach to hyponatremia that is
based on the serum osmolality, such as that followed
by the discussant, can enable the clinician to avoid
errors in diagnosis and potentially harmful treatment. Deaths have followed the misdiagnosis of
pseudohyponatremia as true hyponatremia with aggressive attempts to increase the sodium level with
the use of fluid restriction and hypertonic saline resulting in severe dehydration and hypernatremia.14
A careful diagnostic evaluation with attention to basic physiologic principles and to findings that are
inconsistent with the presumed cause is crucial for
the effective management of this common problem.
We are indebted to Mary Paton of the College of American Pathologists for her help in obtaining data on the laboratory instruments used to measure sodium, to Dr. Donald Wiebe for his assistance in measuring lipoprotein X, and to Drs. Frederick Grant,
Robert J. Soiffer, and Elizabeth Rhee for their help in taking care of
the patient.
references
1. Croal BL, Blake AM, Johnston J, Glen
www.nejm.org
october 9, 2003
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CTR on May 30, 2006 .
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
1469
CORRECTION
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CTR on May 30, 2006 .
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
CORRECTION
Downloaded from www.nejm.org at ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CTR on May 30, 2006 .
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.