Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ON
SUBSURFACE SOIL INVESTIGATION
AND FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
SYRIAN METALS INDUSTRY
S M I ROLLING MILL
AT
ADRAA
DAMASCUS
JULY 2010
1 of 111
TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
0.0 PHOTOS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
19
22
25
38
108
110
2 of 111
The driller
3 of 111
4 of 111
1 - INTRODUCTION :
This report presents the results of the subsurface soil investigation
conducted at the proposed site of the Syrian metals industry S M I.-Rolling Mill
The project is a steel Billet manufacturing plant with a capacity of
630.000t/y of billets, the site is situated in Adraa Industrial City, near Damascus.
The objectives of the investigation are to determine in detail the soil
conditions at the proposed location of the buildings of the steel factory, and
based on these conditions come out by the investigation, we will recommend
the most suitable type of foundations .
2 - PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
The site of the factory is located near the head office of the adraa
industrial city .
There are a previous geotechnical report for the SMI, and this report is for the
Rolling Mill.
The surface of the ground of the factory is nearly flat.
3 - SCOPE OF WORK :
The characteristics of the subsurface soil of the site were determined
using the following data :
a - The results of 12 test borings which was driven to 15-20 meters
depth below ground level , including SPT .
b - A variety of laboratory tests .
c - Our experience in the subsurface conditions of the surrounding
area .
d- The previous Geotechnical reoprt for SMI
All field and laboratory data were analyzed and studied, in order to obtain
the most economical and more suitable foundation solutions .
5 of 111
4 - FIELD INVESTIGATION:
Over the period between 17/6/2010 to 21/6/2010 boring program was
performed on the project area which included 12 boreholes, from 1 to 12.
Three boreholes (1-5-8) were 20 m of depth below the ground surface and the
remaining were 15 m of depth.
4-1 The drilling process : Starting from existing base of
excavation, the drilling process was conducted using a heavy duty, three rotary
drilling machines with AW rods and NX casing , which are capable of driving a
4-inch cased hole .
4-2 Sampling : samples of soil were obtained at each change of
stratum and, 3 sampls from each borehole approximately .The sampling
operation is done by the chopping bit of the pipes ( dry sampling ) . The samples
were placed in plastic bags labeled with boring number , depth from which they
were taken and identification of the soil . The samples were transported to soil
testing laboratory in Damascus for visual inspection and testing . Where
undisturbed soil couldnt be recovered, disturbed samples of soil were recovered
from the boring.
4-3 Ground water observations: It was intended to observe the
free ground water elevation when it was encountered, to be measured for each
borehole at the end of boring and to be recorded on the log sheets . Generally for
the time being , the ground water wasnt encountered at a level of 20 m below
existing ground surface.
4-4 In-situ testing
SPT: During the drilling operations, Standard Penetration Tests were performed
and undisturbed and
encountered .The test was carried out by driving the standard split spoon
sampler , 18" in ( 45 cm ) in length and 35 mm ID by 50 mm OD , into the soil
6 of 111
and counting the blows required to a set of three spacings, 6 inches each . The
blows were imparted by a 140-lb ( 64 kg ) weight falling a distance of 30" in. (
76 cm ) onto the drill rod to which the spoon was attached . The number of
blows for the three 15 cm successive increments were recorded . The penetration
number , referred to as the penetration resistance N ,the values are recorded in
the logs of the boreholes.
During drilling operations of the boreholes, we contiued to observe the sides of
all boreholes, we found that it was standing vertically and no sides had collapsed
inside these boreholes; this ovbsrvation means that soil is cohesive.
5 - LABORATORY TESTING:
A large number of samples were tested in the laboratory to determine the
physical properties, the shear strength parametrs and the engineering
characteristics of the various soil strata as shown on laboratory sheets . For
foundations study purposes , the following tests were performed on the soil
samples to allow the determination of their physical and mechanical properties :
- water content
- natural unit weight
- liquid and plastic limits
- sieve analysis
- direct shear testing
- Consoldation test
- Swelling test
Undisturbed specimens were used in performing water content and unit
weight tests, while part of sample passing sieve No. 40 was utilized for liquid
and plastic limits , representative samples was utilized for sieve analysis and
undisturbed soil specimens were used to perform undrained and unconsolidated
shear box tests. and for consolidation tests. The results of all the above
mentioned tests are summarized in the following tables, sieve test curves are
7 of 111
resistance to drilling. its thickness was 1.5-3 m . and sometimes Rocky lime
clay. And its classification - CL - according to USC.
2- Yellowish Gray lime clay, with medium resistance to drilling. its
thickness was 1.5-4 m . And its classification CL-MH - according to USC.
3 Light yellowish brown lime clay, with medium resistance to
drilling, to the end of the depth of the boreholes. And its classification ML- CL
- according to USC.
During drilling operations no loss of boring water was recorded, which means
that no cavities were encountered.
Attached figures show log sheets, which contain the description of the
materials encountered within the depths of test borings , the soil layers , and the
results of the Standard Penetration Tests.
8 of 111
7 - ENGINEERING DESIGN:
7-1 Determination of foundation soil , its depth and type of
foundations : Our design will be based on the analysis of boreholes
stratification, samples description , SPT field testing, which showed that nearly
all tests reached the value N= 39 to the second layer, and the thierd layer,and
N= 50 for the first layer, and laboratory testing.
We interpret the difference between SPT value in the previous report and this
one is :the time which boreholes and SPT were done, in the previous report It
was in 12/2008 "winter" and in this report It was in 6/2010 "summer" and the
soil is so sensitiv to the water, it become harder when it is more dry.
The probable performance of the foundation materials must be judged with
respect to the inter-related properties of strength and settlement . The subsurface
materials upon which a structure may be founded must be able to support the
structure without a bearing failure, besides, the settlement of the structure, due
to densification of the materials beneath the foundation, mustn't be so great or
uneven as to cause damage to the structure .
the top arable layer was found only in Borehole No1, with 60cm
thickness , so it is recommended to adopt the first layer as a foundation soil
"Gray cohesive to stiff lime clay" , thus the geotechnical level of foundation will
be 1m at least below the existing level of soil, and will be on the stratum of Gray
cohesive lime clay co, with medium resistance to drilling, which is more suitable
to support the foundations of the building. And if some parts of the factory has
deep structral foundation level, so the second layer which is Yellowish Gray
lime clay, with medium resistance to drilling
is suitable
to support the
9 of 111
appendant report.
Case No.1: Single foundations:
We will calculate tow models:
Model 1: 4*6 m and Model 2: 2.5*2.5
7-2 Bearing capacity considerations : The bearing capacity of the first layer
for a single foundations is given by the following expression :
Qult=(1+0.3B/L)*C*Nc+(1+0.3B/L)**D*Nq+(1-0.3B/L)**B*N
Where:
Nc , Nq and N are the bearing capacity factors which depend on the angle of
internal friction.
C is the consistency of the soil which we suppose to be equal to 0.40kg/cm2
is the unit weight of the soil and we consider a value of 1.98 ton/m3.
Df is the depth of embedment of the single foundation below the surface of the
ground , and we consider 1 m .
B is the breadth of the single foundation of the structure.
L is the length of the single foundation of the structure.
This expression shows that the bearing capacity of a soil depends not only
on its engineering properties , but also on the shape and size of the footing , and
on its depth of embedment .
For an estimated average field value of internal friction angle we suppose
for the soil of foundation
Nc = 13.1
N = 1.4
10 of 111
where
S = calculated settlement in cm .
q = intensity of contact pressure .
B = breadth of the single foundation in cm.
11 of 111
Df = the depth of the foundation from the natural ground level not from the
recent ground level.
by substituting , we find :
S1 = 2-(2*1.98/10) 400 1 (1-0.35 0.35)/300 = 1.9 cm
S2 = 2-(2*1.98/10) 250 0.85 (1-0.35 0.35)/300 = 1 cm
The actual value of settlement is expected to be lower than the calculated
value, and it will occur mainly during the constrution period of the reinforced
concrete structural system of the building.
So it is assumed that the allowable soil pressures determined previously
will govern the design of the foundations .
7-4 Bearing capacity based on results of field standard
penetration tests : Nearly, all the results of SPT tests reached the value 39 for
the foundation layer, which match the above calculated value .
Case No.2: Mat foundations:
We will calculate tow models:
Mat1: 17*27 m and Mat2: 12.5*22
7-2 Bearing capacity considerations : The bearing capacity of the first layer
for a mat foundations is given by the following expression :
Qult=(1+0.3B/L)*C*Nc+(1+0.3B/L)**D*Nq+(1-0.3B/L)**B*N
Where:
Nc , Nq and N are the bearing capacity factors which depend on the angle of
internal friction.
C is the consistency of the soil which we suppose to be equal to 0.4kg/cm2
is the unit weight of the soil and we consider a value of 1.98 ton/m3.
12 of 111
Nc = 13.1
N = 1.4
13 of 111
where
S = calculated settlement in cm .
q = intensity of contact pressure .
B = breadth of the mat foundation
14 of 111
penetration tests : Nearly, all the results of SPT tests reached the value 39 for
the foundation layer, which match the above calculated value .
Case No.3: Strip foundations
We will calculate three models:
Strip1: B=1.5m
Strip2: B=2m
Strip3: B=3m
7-2 Bearing capacity considerations : The bearing capacity of the Second
layer for a Strip foundations is given by the following expression :
Qult=C*Nc+*D*Nq+*B*N
Where:
Nc , Nq and N are the bearing capacity factors which depend on the angle of
internal friction.
C is the consistency of the soil which we suppose to be equal to 0.4 Kg/cm2 .
is the unit weight of the soil and we consider a value of 1.98 ton/m3.
Df is the depth of embedment of the strip foundation below the surface of the
ground.
B is the breadth of the strip foundation of the structure.
this expression shows that the bearing capacity of a soil depends not only on its
engineering properties , but also on the shape and size of the footing , and on its
depth of embedment .
For an estimated average field value of internal friction angle we suppose
for the soil of foundation
Nc = 13.1
N = 1.4
15 of 111
where
S = calculated settlement in cm .
q = intensity of contact pressure .
B = breadth of the strip foundation in cm .
16 of 111
Iw = influence factor which equals for the strip foundation a value of 2.2.
Df = the depth of the foundation from the natural ground level not from the
recent ground level.
by substituting , we find :
S1 = (2-2*1.98/10) 150 2.2 (1-0.35 0.35)/300 = 1.5 cm
S2 = (2-2*1.98/10) 200 2.2 (1-0.35 0.35)/300 = 2 cm
S3 = (2-2*1.98/10) 300 2.2 (1-0.35 0.35)/300 = 3 cm
All the values are less than 8cm .ok
So it is assumed that the allowable soil pressures determined previously
will govern the design of the foundations .
7-4 Bearing capacity based on results of field standard
penetration tests : Nearly, all the results of SPT tests reached the value 39 for
the foundation layer, which match the above calculated value .
Case No.4: Piles
Where the load is too high and the settelment will be not allowable, we
can use reinforced concrete pile.
The following pages will introduce the design of a pile depending on
AllPile program , where we analysed a reinforced concrete pile:
Model 1: 12 m length and 90 cm diameter.
Ultimate Total Capacity = 2201.9- kN
Ultimate Skin Resistance = 1588.4- kN
Ultimate Tip Resistance = 613.5- kN
Settlement at ultimate load = 4.25- cm
Allowable Capacity = 1365.7- kN
F.S. for Tip = 2.0, for Skin = 1.5
Settlement at allowable load = 2.64- cm
Work Load = 1100.0- kN
F.S. for work load = 2.0
17 of 111
Uplift:
Ultimate Total Capacity = 1525.1- kN
Ultimate Skin Resistance = 1333.0- kN
Weight of Pile = 192.1- kN
Allowable Capacity = 858.6- kN
F.S. for skin = 2.0, for Weight = 1.0
Input Data:
Pile Length = 12- m
Pile diameter =90 cm
Vertical load at head: 1100- kN
Model 2: 15 m length and 90 cm diameter.
Downward:
Ultimate Total Capacity = 2858.2- kN
Ultimate Skin Resistance = 2139.3- kN
Ultimate Tip Resistance = 718.9- kN
Settlement at ultimate load = 4.30- cm
Allowable Capacity = 1785.6- kN
F.S. for Tip = 2.0, for Skin = 1.5
Settlement at allowable load = 2.69- cm
Work Load = 1400.0- kN
F.S. for work load = 2.0
Settlement at work load = 2.11- cm
Uplift:
Ultimate Total Capacity = 1986.9- kN
Ultimate Skin Resistance = 1746.8- kN
18 of 111
19 of 111
structural level , type and dimensions are different, therefore we studied three
cases, mat, strip and Pile and the results are tabulated in the next table:
Case
No.
Type of
foundation
Single
mat
strip
reinforced
concrete pile
Model
No.
Dimensions
depth of
foundation
Bearing
capacity
Settlement
mm
1
2
1
2
4*6m
2.5*2.5m
17*27m
12.5*22m
1m
1m
1m
1m
2kg/cm2
2kg/cm2
1,5 kg/cm2
1,7 kg/cm2
19
10
98
95
B=1.5
1m
2kg/cm2
15
B=2
1m
2kg/cm
B=3
1m
2kg/cm2
Diameter=90cm
L= 12m
110 Ton
21
Diameter=90cm
L= 15m
140 Ton
21
20 of 111
21 of 111
22 of 111
S M I- RM
PHYSICAL & MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES OF SOIL
30.828737
BORING
DEPTH OF SAMPLE.m
PROPERTY
19.561996
29.456284
14.918033
19.885926
19.14966
B2
B1
3-3.5
4.5-5
7.5-8
1-1.5
30.83%
19.56%
29.46%
4-4.5
20.468076
B3
23.295092
15.85545723
B4
21.40458015
20.15381582
B5
19.33277499
B6
11-11.5
1.5-2
7.5-8
3.5-4
4.5-5
13.5-14
4-4.5
7.5-8
14.92%
19.89%
19.15%
20.47%
23.30%
15.86%
21.40%
20.15%
19.33%
SYMBOL
UNIT
gr/cc
1.80
2.05
1.90
1.95
2.01
2.02
1.90
1.96
2.02
2.07
1.94
1.98
gr/cc
1.38
1.71
1.47
1.70
1.68
1.69
1.58
1.59
1.75
1.71
1.61
1.66
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
2.66
Gs
2.70
2.66
2.68
2.70
2.66
2.62
2.68
2.66
2.66
2.65
2.67
VOIDS RATIO
0.96
0.55
0.83
0.59
0.58
0.55
0.70
0.68
0.52
0.55
0.65
0.61
POROSITY
49.04%
35.68%
45.33%
37.09%
36.85%
35.35%
41.01%
40.34%
34.31%
35.55%
39.53%
37.70%
DEGREE OF SATURATION
Sr
86.49%
93.80%
95.22%
68.33%
90.65%
91.74%
78.90%
91.63%
80.76%
102.85%
82.33%
84.99%
15
15
13
0.54
0.56
0.66
0%
0%
0%
0%
Natural
ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION
submerged
17
17
17
Natural
COHESION
C
submerged
gravel
sand
clay
point load
consolidation
swelling pressure
LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
PLASTICITY INDEX
CLASSEFICATION
0.54
0%
0.60
2%
0%
0.35
0%
10%
1%
0%
0.44
0%
10%
8%
8%
7%
10%
29%
7%
5%
10%
24%
10%
3%
90%
94%
92%
93%
80%
70%
93%
95%
90%
76%
90%
97%
0.090
0.076
0.096
0.140
0.090
0.50
0.70
0.25
0.40
0.50
Kg\cm2
Cc
Qsw
Kg\cm2
LL
PL
PI
39%
47%
50%
41%
50%
42%
43%
50%
46%
48%
43%
47%
20%
25%
28%
22%
27%
24%
22%
28%
25%
27%
23%
28%
19%
22%
22%
19%
23%
18%
21%
22%
21%
21%
20%
19%
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
ML
CL
ML
1st Layer
2d layer
3th year
23 of 111
S M I- RM
20.31536487
BORING
DEPTH OF SAMPLE.m
PROPERTY
M
SYMBOL
19.38658357
25.08349446
B7
23.39314845
23.93804271
19.14965986
16.45334434
B9
B8
23.29509242
15.85545723
B10
21.40458015
22.61140975
B11
23.16258352
average
B12
1-1.5
7 -7.5
4-5
9.5-10
3.5-4
14-14.5
1-1.5
5-5.5
3.5-4
9.5-10
5.5-6
7.5-8
14.5-15
1st Layer
2d layer
3th year
UNIT
20.32%
19.39%
25.08%
23.39%
23.94%
19.15%
16.45%
23.30%
15.86%
21.40%
22.61%
23.16%
20.71%
20.79%
21.85%
gr/cc
2.13
2.05
1.96
1.95
1.91
1.96
2.04
2.08
1.93
1.99
1.96
1.98
1.98
1.97
1.99
gr/cc
1.77
1.71
1.57
1.58
1.54
1.64
1.75
1.69
1.67
1.64
1.60
1.61
1.65
1.63
1.63
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Gs
2.66
2.66
2.66
2.69
2.66
2.66
2.66
2.66
2.66
2.68
2.66
2.66
2.67
2.66
2.67
VOIDS RATIO
0.50
0.55
0.70
0.71
0.73
0.62
0.52
0.58
0.59
0.64
0.66
0.65
0.63
0.64
0.64
POROSITY
33.48%
35.59%
41.11%
41.37%
42.04%
38.22%
34.25%
36.65%
37.27%
38.93%
39.83%
39.46%
38.17%
38.76%
38.72%
DEGREE OF SATURATION
Sr
107.39%
93.34%
95.59%
89.17%
87.79%
82.33%
84.03%
107.11%
70.98%
90.00%
90.85%
94.51%
88.14%
86.72%
91.46%
18
16
15
0.59
Natural
ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION
submerged
20
16
27
14
16
Natural
COHESION
C
submerged
0.32
0.66
0.40
0.50
gravel
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
1%
sand
30%
3%
6%
11%
12%
18%
5%
12%
13%
16%
14%
13%
21%
10%
10%
30%
97%
94%
89%
88%
82%
95%
88%
87%
84%
86%
87%
69%
91%
89%
0.063
0.080
0.083
0.115
0.50
0.38
0.60
0.45
clay
point load
consolidation
swelling pressure
0.47
0.31
0.61
Kg\cm2
Cc
Qsw
Kg\cm2
LIQUID LIMIT
LL
41%
49%
51%
50%
40%
49%
38%
49%
50%
44%
50%
46%
43%
46%
47%
PLASTIC LIMIT
PL
23%
28%
28%
26%
24%
27%
21%
28%
27%
24%
26%
25%
24%
25%
26%
PLASTICITY INDEX
PI
18%
21%
23%
24%
16%
22%
17%
21%
23%
20%
24%
21%
19%
20%
21%
CL
ML
MH
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL-MH
CL-ML
CLASSEFICATION
1st Layer
2d layer
3th year
24 of 111
Borehole logs
25 of 111
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
1
DEPTH
20m
Date of test
21/6/2010
Depth
(m)
0.6 m
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
11
3.00
4.50
26 35 40
6.00
7.50
9.00
27 39 26
10.50
12.00
27 34 41
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
26 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
2
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
21/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
50 (6cm)
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
21 25 30
9.00
10.50
19 23 29
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
27 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
3
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
21/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
50 (10cm)
3.00
4.50
19 22 27
6.00
7.50
18 24 31
9.00
10.50
25 50(12cm)
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
28 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
4
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
20/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
3.00
4.50
Yellowish Gray lime clay (CL)
6.00
7.50
9.00
10.50
Light yellowish brown silty lime clay (ML)
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
29 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
5
DEPTH
20m
Date of test
23/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
42 50(7cm)
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
9.00
10.50
18 21 19
12.00
13.50
16 19 20
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
30 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
6
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
20/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
9.00
10.50
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
31 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
7
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
19/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
50 (7cm)
3.00
4.50
15 28 30
6.00
7.50
19 20 28
9.00
10.50
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
32 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
8
DEPTH
20m
Date of test
20/6/2010
Depth
(m)
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
1.50
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
9.00
10.50
22 28 33
Light yellowish brown lime clay (CL)
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
Light brown lime clay and flint gravel
19.50
33 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
9
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
23/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
50 (10cm)
3.00
4.50
17 23 29
6.00
7.50
19 21 30
9.00
10.50
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
34 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
10
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
19/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
50 (9cm)
3.00
Yellowish Gray lime clay (CL)
4.50
21 27 30
6.00
7.50
9.00
10.50
18 23 30
Light yellowish brown lime clay (CL)
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
35 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
11
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
19/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
35 50 (9cm)
3.00
4.50
24 21 18
6.00
7.50
9.00
10.50
16 19 21
Light yellowish brown lime clay (CL)
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
36 of 111
Notes
Borehole log
SMI
LOCATION
BORE HOLE No.
Adraa
12
DEPTH
15m
Date of test
21/6/2010
Depth
(m)
1.50
sample
BROJECT
S.P.T
(N)
25 27 47
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
29 20 23
9.00
10.50
12.00
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
37 of 111
Notes
38 of 111
Project:
SMI -RM
Boring No.
Depth m
Can No.
Wt of can =
Wt of wet soil +
can
NATURAL WATER
CONTENT%
3-3.5
12
16.68
86.48
75.42
18.83
4.5-5
23
20.21
92.82
80.94
19.56
7.5-8
15.56
80.56
65.77
29.46
1-1.5
16.58
93.69
83.68
14.92
11-11.5
26
17.17
94.94
82.04
19.89
1.5-2
12
16.38
86.44
75.18
19.15
7.5-8
10
17.23
75.91
65.94
20.47
3.5-4
34
20.38
97.76
83.14
23.30
4.5-5
20
14.52
93.07
82.32
15.86
10
13.5-14
40
16.90
96.42
82.40
21.40
11
4-4.5
16.72
77.65
67.43
20.15
12
7.5-8
19.63
105.12
91.27
19.33
Wt of sample
Wt of waxed
sample
Wt of Submerged
waxed sample
NATURAL UNIT
WEIGHT
Boring No.
Depth
Description
3-3.5
91.19
93.29
45.14
1.99
4.5-5
106.80
109.50
54.29
2.05
7.5-8
113.37
116.62
53.24
1.90
1-1.5
108.05
110.55
52.42
1.95
11-11.5
108.31
111.07
54.22
2.01
1.5-2
94.68
96.88
47.52
2.02
7.5-8
101.84
104.32
48.09
1.90
3.5-4
110.75
112.77
53.92
1.96
4.5-5
124.98
127.92
62.92
2.02
10
13.5-14
134.33
137.29
69.22
2.07
11
4-4.5
73.79
76.63
35.44
1.94
12
7.5-8
89.43
91.85
43.94
1.98
39 of 111
Project:
SMI -RM
Boring No.
Depth m
Can No.
Wt of can =
Wt of wet soil +
can
NATURAL WATER
CONTENT%
13
1-1.5
18.50
84.12
73.04
20.32
14
7 -7.5
18.71
91.50
79.68
19.39
15
4-5
16.92
88.08
73.81
25.08
16
9.5-10
90
15.57
91.21
76.87
23.39
17
3.5-4
43
15.28
68.09
57.89
23.94
18
14-14.5
23
16.38
86.44
75.18
19.15
19
10
1-1.5
56
14.46
70.87
62.90
16.45
20
10
5-5.5
20.38
97.76
83.14
23.30
21
11
3.5-4
14.52
93.07
82.32
15.86
22
11
9.5-10
23
16.90
96.42
82.40
21.40
23
12
5.5-6
19.64
90.35
77.31
22.61
24
12
7.5-8
18.40
90.29
76.77
23.16
Wt of sample
Wt of waxed
sample
Wt of Submerged
waxed sample
NATURAL UNIT
WEIGHT
Boring No.
Depth
Description
1-1.5
108.96
111.50
57.50
2.13
7 -7.5
106.80
109.50
54.29
2.05
4-5
105.67
107.85
51.50
1.96
9.5-10
107.12
107.60
52.02
1.95
3.5-4
85.62
87.89
40.56
1.91
14-14.5
94.68
96.88
46.08
1.96
10
1-1.5
107.08
109.58
54.23
2.04
10
5-5.5
97.26
99.22
50.23
2.08
11
3.5-4
124.98
127.92
60.00
1.93
10
11
9.5-10
134.33
137.29
66.40
1.99
11
12
5.5-6
104.56
106.14
51.10
1.96
12
12
7.5-8
107.38
109.42
53.01
1.98
40 of 111
Project
SMI-RM
11
Sample No.
3-3.5
7.5-8
1.5-2
7.5-8
13.5-14
9.5-10
50
50
50
50
50
50
Wt.Bottle+Water,W2,In g
336.7
640.6
640.6
645
637.6
639.6
Wt.Bottle+Water+Soil,W1,In g
368.21
672.00
671.54
676.40
668.80
671.00
20
20
20
20
20
20
0.9982
0.9982
0.9982
0.9982
0.9982
0.9982
2.70
2.68
2.62
2.68
2.65
2.68
Depth
Wt.Soil,Ws,In g
Temperature
Gs=
Gt.Ws
Ws-W1+W2
41 of 111
Project :
SMI- RM
B-1
DEPTH:3.5-4m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
97%
No. 20
0.85
96%
No. 40
0.42
95%
No. 60
0.25
95%
No. 100
0.15
92%
No. 200
0.075
90%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
42 of 111
10%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
90%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-1
DEPTH:4.5-5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
98%
No. 10
97%
No. 20
0.85
95%
No. 40
0.42
94%
No. 60
0.25
93%
No. 100
0.15
92%
No. 200
0.075
90%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
2%
Sand:
43 of 111
8%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
90%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-1
DEPTH:7.5-8m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
98%
No. 20
0.85
97%
No. 40
0.42
96%
No. 60
0.25
95%
No. 100
0.15
94%
No. 200
0.075
92%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
44 of 111
8%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
92%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-2
DEPTH:4.5-5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
98%
No. 60
0.25
95%
No. 100
0.15
94%
No. 200
0.075
93%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
45 of 111
7%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
93%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-2
DEPTH:11-11.5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
97%
No. 4
4.76
91%
No. 10
89%
No. 20
0.85
88%
No. 40
0.42
85%
No. 60
0.25
83%
No. 100
0.15
82%
No. 200
0.075
81%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
10%
Sand:
46 of 111
10%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
81%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-3
DEPTH:1.5-2m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
99%
No. 10
97%
No. 20
0.85
95%
No. 40
0.42
92%
No. 60
0.25
88%
No. 100
0.15
79%
No. 200
0.075
70%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
1%
Sand:
47 of 111
30%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
70%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-3
DEPTH:7.5-8m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
98%
No. 20
0.85
97%
No. 40
0.42
97%
No. 60
0.25
95%
No. 100
0.15
94%
No. 200
0.075
93%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
48 of 111
7%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
93%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-4
DEPTH:3.5-4m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
97%
No. 60
0.25
97%
No. 100
0.15
96%
No. 200
0.075
95%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
49 of 111
5%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
95%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-5
DEPTH:4.5-5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
93%
No. 60
0.25
92%
No. 100
0.15
91%
No. 200
0.075
90%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
50 of 111
10%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
90%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-5
DEPTH:13.5-14m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
86%
No. 20
0.85
81%
No. 40
0.42
78%
No. 60
0.25
78%
No. 100
0.15
77%
No. 200
0.075
76%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
51 of 111
24%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
76%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-6
DEPTH:4-4.5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
99%
No. 20
0.85
96%
No. 40
0.42
95%
No. 60
0.25
93%
No. 100
0.15
91%
No. 200
0.075
90%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
52 of 111
10%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
90%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-6
DEPTH:7.5-8m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
99%
No. 60
0.25
98%
No. 100
0.15
97%
No. 200
0.075
97%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
53 of 111
3%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
97%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-7
DEPTH:1-1.5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
82%
3/4''
19.1
80%
1/2"
12.7
70%
3/8''
9.5
65%
No. 4
4.76
60%
No. 10
54%
No. 20
0.85
48%
No. 40
0.42
39%
No. 60
0.25
39%
No. 100
0.15
37%
No. 200
0.075
30%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
40%
Sand:
54 of 111
31%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
30%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-7
DEPTH:7-7.5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
99%
No. 60
0.25
98%
No. 100
0.15
98%
No. 200
0.075
97%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
55 of 111
3%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
97%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-8
DEPTH:4-5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
99%
No. 20
0.85
99%
No. 40
0.42
97%
No. 60
0.25
97%
No. 100
0.15
95%
No. 200
0.075
94%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
56 of 111
6%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
94%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-8
DEPTH:9.5-10m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
96%
No. 60
0.25
94%
No. 100
0.15
92%
No. 200
0.075
89%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
57 of 111
11%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
89%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-9
DEPTH:3.5-4m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
96%
No. 20
0.85
95%
No. 40
0.42
94%
No. 60
0.25
93%
No. 100
0.15
90%
No. 200
0.075
88%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
58 of 111
12%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
88%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-9
DEPTH:14-14.5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
90%
No. 60
0.25
88%
No. 100
0.15
85%
No. 200
0.075
83%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
59 of 111
18%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
83%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-10
DEPTH:5-5.5m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
99%
No. 20
0.85
98%
No. 40
0.42
97%
No. 60
0.25
97%
No. 100
0.15
96%
No. 200
0.075
95%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
60 of 111
5%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
95%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-11
DEPTH:3.5-4m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
92%
No. 60
0.25
90%
No. 100
0.15
90%
No. 200
0.075
88%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
61 of 111
12%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
88%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-11
DEPTH:9.5-10m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
92%
No. 60
0.25
90%
No. 100
0.15
88%
No. 200
0.075
87%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
62 of 111
13%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
87%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-12
DEPTH:5.5-6m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
91%
No. 60
0.25
88%
No. 100
0.15
86%
No. 200
0.075
84%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
63 of 111
16%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
84%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-12
DEPTH:7.5-8m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
100%
No. 20
0.85
100%
No. 40
0.42
92%
No. 60
0.25
90%
No. 100
0.15
88%
No. 200
0.075
86%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
64 of 111
14%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
86%
Project :
SMI- RM
B-12
DEPTH:14.5-15m
Opening
Passing
2"
50.8
100%
1 1/2''
38.1
100%
1''
25.4
100%
3/4''
19.1
100%
1/2"
12.7
100%
3/8''
9.5
100%
No. 4
4.76
100%
No. 10
98%
No. 20
0.85
94%
No. 40
0.42
92%
No. 60
0.25
91%
No. 100
0.15
90%
No. 200
0.075
87%
SIEVE ANALYSIS
100%
90%
80%
70%
Percent finer %
no.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10
Gravel
Gravel:
Particle size mm
0.1
0.01
Sand
0%
Sand:
65 of 111
13%
Silt
Fines:
0.001
Clay
87%
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 1
DEPTH
3-3.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
11
15.30
20.34
14.43
17.25
23.24
40.62
32.43
33.31
21.89
34.80
27.37
28.86
6.59
14.46
12.94
11.61
1.35
5.82
5.06
4.45
20.49
40.25
39.10
38.33
15
23
34
Container No.
Number Of Blows
Moisture Content %
41
40
39
38
37
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
39.12
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
39.12
20.49
18.63
66 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 1
DEPTH
7.5-8m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
11
15.57
19.68
18.71
15.29
24.85
39.38
34.00
38.75
22.98
32.89
29.06
31.69
7.41
13.21
10.35
16.4
1.87
6.49
4.94
7.06
25.24
49.13
47.73
43.05
16
24
45
Container No.
Number Of Blows
51
50
Moisture Content %
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
47.29
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
47.29
25.24
22.05
67 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 2
DEPTH
1-1.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
34
15.50
15.13
14.44
19.60
27.08
34.00
34.35
36.40
24.59
27.72
27.60
30.96
9.09
12.59
13.16
11.36
2.49
6.28
6.75
5.44
27.39
49.88
51.29
47.89
25
13
33
Container No.
Number Of Blows
52
Moisture Content %
51
50
49
48
47
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
49.45
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
49.45
27.39
22.05
68 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 2
DEPTH
4-4.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
10
16.91
19.61
15.57
16.72
24.70
41.52
34.46
37.18
23.29
34.94
29.05
31.61
6.38
15.33
13.48
14.89
1.41
6.58
5.41
5.57
22.10
42.92
40.13
37.41
13
28
41
Container No.
Number Of Blows
44
Moisture Content %
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
40.55
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
40.55
22.10
18.45
69 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 2
DEPTH
11-11.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
15.55
15.28
14.42
19.63
27.01
34.19
34.33
36.40
24.59
27.72
27.65
30.90
9.04
12.44
13.23
11.27
2.42
6.47
6.68
5.5
26.77
52.01
50.49
48.80
11
20
38
Container No.
Number Of Blows
53
Moisture Content %
52
51
50
49
48
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
50.19
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
50.19
26.77
23.42
70 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 3
DEPTH
1.5-2 m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
10
16.93
15.60
16.40
17.22
27.03
35.00
37.48
43.95
25.04
28.95
31.29
36.57
8.11
13.35
14.89
19.35
1.99
6.05
6.19
7.38
24.54
45.32
41.57
38.14
11
28
43
Container No.
Number Of Blows
50
45
Moisture Content %
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
42.10
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
42.10
24.54
17.56
71 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 3
DEPTH
7.5-8m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
22
16.91
14.47
18.53
16.73
24.13
36.98
38.85
41.02
22.81
30.11
32.76
34.15
5.9
15.64
14.23
17.42
1.32
6.87
6.09
6.87
22.37
43.93
42.80
39.44
19
28
43
Container No.
Number Of Blows
45
Moisture Content %
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
42.98
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
42.98
22.37
20.61
72 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 4
DEPTH
3.5-4m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
15.53
15.13
14.44
19.60
27.09
34.00
34.35
36.40
24.59
27.72
27.65
30.90
9.06
12.59
13.21
11.3
2.5
6.28
6.7
5.5
27.59
49.88
50.72
48.67
20
15
37
Container No.
Moisture Content %
51
50
49
48
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
49.66
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
49.66
27.59
22.07
73 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 5
DEPTH
4.5-5 m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
13
11
15.55
17.22
18.73
15.24
24.13
34.71
38.95
36.81
22.39
29.11
32.63
30.24
6.84
11.89
13.9
15
1.74
5.6
6.32
6.57
25.44
47.10
45.47
43.80
18
26
35
Container No.
Number Of Blows
48
Moisture Content %
47
46
45
44
43
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
45.69
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
45.69
25.44
20.26
74 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 5
DEPTH
13.5-14m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
14.42
16.99
16.72
19.63
24.08
39.20
34.70
40.84
22.01
31.78
28.89
34.16
7.59
14.79
12.17
14.53
2.07
7.42
5.81
6.68
27.27
50.17
47.74
45.97
15
22
39
Container No.
Number Of Blows
51
Moisture Content %
50
49
48
47
46
45
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
47.98
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
47.98
27.27
20.71
75 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 6
DEPTH
4-4.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
10
16.36
14.47
19.63
15.59
27.75
38.39
34.18
33.25
25.60
31.08
29.84
28.17
9.24
16.61
10.21
12.58
2.15
7.31
4.34
5.08
23.27
44.01
42.51
40.38
18
27
49
Container No.
Number Of Blows
45
Moisture Content %
44
43
42
41
40
39
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
43.00
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
43.00
23.27
19.73
76 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 6
DEPTH
7.5-8m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
11
16.36
19.66
15.30
18.74
25.68
35.79
31.30
38.51
23.64
30.50
26.50
32.29
7.28
10.84
11.2
13.55
2.04
5.29
4.8
6.22
28.02
48.80
42.86
45.90
18
40
26
Container No.
Number Of Blows
50
49
Moisture Content %
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
46.59
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
46.59
28.02
18.57
77 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 7
DEPTH
1-1.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
17.24
16.91
16.77
16.42
26.09
39.12
37.10
40.13
24.41
32.50
31.21
33.69
7.17
15.59
14.44
17.27
1.68
6.62
5.89
6.44
23.43
42.46
40.79
37.29
14
24
49
Container No.
Number Of Blows
44
Moisture Content %
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
40.72
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
40.72
23.43
17.29
78 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 7
DEPTH
7-7.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
22
17.24
18.50
18.71
16.91
25.91
40.89
38.58
37.52
24.02
33.39
32.09
30.85
6.78
14.89
13.38
13.94
1.89
7.5
6.49
6.67
27.88
50.37
48.51
47.85
16
26
35
Container No.
Number Of Blows
Moisture Content %
51
50
49
48
47
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
48.98
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
48.98
27.88
21.11
79 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 8
DEPTH
4-5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
10
15.57
16.72
16.39
19.63
24.49
34.70
36.98
38.68
22.53
28.53
30.03
32.47
6.96
11.81
13.64
12.84
1.96
6.17
6.95
6.21
28.16
52.24
50.95
48.36
15
22
40
Container No.
Number Of Blows
53
Moisture Content %
52
51
50
49
48
47
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
50.60
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
50.60
28.16
22.44
80 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 8
DEPTH
9.5-10m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
20.38
15.28
17.24
14.44
27.60
41.92
38.16
35.68
26.09
32.84
31.24
28.94
5.71
17.56
14
14.5
1.51
9.08
6.92
6.74
26.44
51.71
49.43
46.48
17
24
44
Container No.
Number Of Blows
53
Moisture Content %
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
49.78
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
49.78
26.44
23.33
81 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 9
DEPTH
3.5-4m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
22
11
20.33
18.38
16.39
15.24
28.73
41.72
40.92
34.46
27.11
34.96
33.84
29.05
6.78
16.58
17.45
13.81
1.62
6.76
7.08
5.41
23.89
40.77
40.57
39.17
17
24
37
Container No.
Number Of Blows
Moisture Content %
42
41
40
39
38
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
40.25
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
40.25
23.89
16.36
82 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 9
DEPTH
14-14.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
20
32
23
13
15.80
15.13
14.44
19.50
27.00
34.00
34.35
36.40
24.59
27.72
27.65
30.90
8.79
12.59
13.21
11.4
2.41
6.28
6.7
5.5
27.42
49.88
50.72
48.25
21
11
35
Container No.
Number Of Blows
Moisture Content %
52
51
50
49
48
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
49.33
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
49.33
27.42
21.91
83 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 10
DEPTH
5-5.5m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
22
16.91
18.50
20.38
16.73
24.04
36.74
40.02
39.61
22.79
31.19
34.36
34.12
5.88
12.69
13.98
17.39
1.25
5.55
5.66
5.49
21.26
43.74
40.49
31.57
12
25
37
Container No.
Number Of Blows
50
45
Moisture Content %
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
38.07
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
38.07
21.26
16.81
84 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 11
DEPTH
3.5-4m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
10
12
56
87
15.50
15.14
14.45
19.69
27.10
34.10
34.35
36.40
24.59
27.72
27.90
30.90
9.09
12.58
13.45
11.21
2.51
6.38
6.45
5.5
27.61
50.72
47.96
49.06
13
32
25
Container No.
Number Of Blows
52
Moisture Content %
51
50
49
48
47
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
48.99
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
48.99
27.61
21.38
85 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 11
DEPTH
9.5-10m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
15.53
15.13
14.44
19.60
27.00
34.00
34.35
36.40
24.59
27.72
27.65
30.90
9.06
12.59
13.21
11.3
2.41
6.28
6.7
5.5
26.60
49.88
50.72
48.67
21
13
37
Container No.
Number Of Blows
Moisture Content %
52
51
50
49
48
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
49.64
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
49.64
26.60
23.04
86 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 12
DEPTH
5.5-6m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
10
14.44
17.24
16.98
15.58
22.91
38.65
40.39
35.28
21.30
32.21
33.47
29.16
6.86
14.97
16.49
13.58
1.61
6.44
6.92
6.12
23.47
43.02
41.96
45.07
27
41
17
Container No.
Number Of Blows
46
Moisture Content %
45
44
43
42
41
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
43.75
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
43.75
23.47
20.28
87 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 12
DEPTH
7.5-8m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
18
90
67
15.38
15.17
14.49
19.65
27.00
34.00
34.35
36.40
24.59
27.72
27.65
30.90
9.21
12.55
13.16
11.25
2.41
6.28
6.7
5.5
26.17
50.04
50.91
48.89
20
15
37
Container No.
Number Of Blows
Moisture Content %
52
51
50
49
48
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
49.85
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
49.85
26.17
23.69
88 of 111
100
Atterberg Limits
BROJECT
SMI-RM
LOCATION
draa
BH 12
DEPTH
15.00 m
Date of test
6/2010
Type Of Test
Plastic Limit
Liquid Limits
11
22
16.39
18.77
15.29
18.50
22.73
40.66
35.49
39.30
21.45
33.58
29.18
33.13
5.06
14.81
13.89
14.63
1.28
7.08
6.31
6.17
25.30
47.81
45.43
42.17
14
28
42
Container No.
Number Of Blows
49
Moisture Content %
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
1
Number Of Blows
10
20
25
45.69
30
40
50
60
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
45.69
25.30
20.39
89 of 111
100
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH1
DEPTH
3-3.5m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.88
0.67
0.5
0.97
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
17
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.54 Kg/cm2
90 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH2
DEPTH
4-4.5m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.75
0.68
0.5
0.84
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.60 Kg/cm2
91 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH 3
DEPTH
1.5-2m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0.68
0.5
0.81
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
17
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.35 Kg/cm2
92 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH 4
DEPTH
3.5-4m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.81
0.67
0.5
0.94
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
15
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.54 Kg/cm2
93 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH 5
DEPTH
4.5-5m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.83
0.68
0.5
0.94
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
15
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.56 Kg/cm2
94 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH 5
DEPTH
13.5-14m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.89
0.78
1.01
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
13
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.66 Kg/cm2
95 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH 6
DEPTH
7.5-8m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.76
0.58
0.5
0.88
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
17
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.44 Kg/cm2
96 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH7
DEPTH
1-1.5m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0.85
0.7
0.49
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
20
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.32 Kg/cm2
97 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH 8
DEPTH
4-5m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.78
0.61
0.5
0.9
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
16
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.47 Kg/cm2
98 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH9
DEPTH
3.5-4m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1.07
0.8
0.57
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
27
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.31 Kg/cm2
99 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH10
DEPTH
5-5.5m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.86
0.74
0.99
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
14
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.61 Kg/cm2
100 of 111
4.5
SMI-RM
LOCATION
Draa
BH12
DEPTH
15.00 m
Date of test
6/2010
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.94
0.81
1.1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
16
Cohesion C
3.5
Degree
0.66 Kg/cm2
101 of 111
4.5
SMI- RM
BORING No
N
E.Kg/Cm2
B1
273
d
depth
th 7.5-8m
758
Cc 0.0902
e%
0.900
0 800
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
0 400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0 000
0.000
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Kg/Cm2
Kgr/cm2
-1
102 of 111
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SMI- RM
BORING No
N
E.Kg/Cm2
Bh2
436
depth
d th 4.5m
45
Cc 0.076
e%
0.900
0 800
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
0 400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0 000
0.000
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Kg/Cm2
Kgr/cm2
-1
103 of 111
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SMI- RM
BORING No
N
E.Kg/Cm2
B3
354
d
depth
th 1.5-2m
152
Cc 0.0959
e%
0.900
0 800
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
0 400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0 000
0.000
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Kg/Cm2
Kgr/cm2
-1
104 of 111
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SMI- RM
BORING No
E.Kg/Cm2
B5
188
depth 14.5m
Cc 0.1453
e%
1 200
1.200
1.000
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.200
0.000
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Kg/Cm2
Kgr/cm2
-1
10
105 of 111
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
SMI- RM
BORING No
N
E.Kg/Cm2
B6
233
d
depth
th 4-4.5m
445
Cc 0.0897
e%
0.900
0 800
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
0 400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0 000
0.000
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Kg/Cm2
Kgr/cm2
-1
106 of 111
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SMI- RM
BORING No
E.Kg/Cm2
Bh7
300
depth 1-1.5m
Cc 0.063
e%
0.900
0.800
0.700
0.600
0 500
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Kg/Cm2
Kgr/cm2
-1
10
107 of 111
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Borehole Points
coordinate
108 of 111
Point
-238806.153
-60485.349
608.31
-238722.413
-60492.92
608.22
-238663.528
-60454.31
608.18
-238571.471
-60434.445
608.22
-238770.636
-60527.434
608.11
-238646.634
-60499.111
608.14
-238575.929
-60486.461
608.17
-238528.584
-60485.984
608.48
-238698.778
-60558.172
608.09
10
-238591.404
-60538.379
608.21
11
-238639.358
-60576.286
608.22
12
-238545.011
-60559.532
608.07
109 of 111
110 of 111
111 of 111